Crushed by the Elephant

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: ADELFAPINEDA @ 10/16/2008 10:47:08 AM

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30122043&l=0510b&id=1130236838
    OBAMA PROXIMO PRESIDENTE NORTEAMERICANO. , TRANSFORMACIÓN SOCIAL-CULTURAL. Su gobierno se implementara políticas en los valores: del respeto a la vida, la libertad, la solidaridad, la tolerancia, los derechos humanos. su programa de gobierno EL DESARROLLO, el desarrollo económico, industrial, empresarial- Energético, y el desarrollo aplicado a la reducción de LA POBREZA, Desarrollo Agrario-rural-cultural, entramado de medidas, tecnologías para la sostenibilidad con educación para la sostenibilidad. DESARROLLO CULTURAL, REFORMA IMIGRGATORIA 1ADELFA PINEDA TRANSPARENCIA Y ÉTICA: Por el Desarrollo del País; Dignidad Publica, 1

  • Posted By: ADELFAPINEDA @ 10/16/2008 10:37:13 AM

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30122043&l=0510b&id=1130236838
    OBAMA PROXIMO PRESIDENTE NORTEAMERICANO. , TRANSFORMACIÓN SOCIAL-CULTURAL. Su gobierno se implementara políticas en los valores: del respeto a la vida, la libertad, la solidaridad, la tolerancia, los derechos humanos. su programa de gobierno EL DESARROLLO, el desarrollo económico, industrial, empresarial- Energético, y el desarrollo aplicado a la reducción de LA POBREZA, Agrario-rural-cultural, entramado de medidas, tecnologías para la sostenibilidad con educación para la sostenibilidad. DESARROLLO CULTURAL, REFORMA IMIGRGATORIA 1ADELFA PINEDA TRANSPARENCIA Y ÉTICA: Por el Desarrollo del País; Dignidad Publica, 1

  • Posted By: billtill @ 10/14/2008 9:57:28 AM

    About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh , had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years earlier:

    'A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government.'
    'A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.'
    'From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.'

    'The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years'

    'During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the following sequence:

    1. from bondage to spiritual faith;
    2. from spiritual faith to great courage;
    3. from courage to liberty;
    4. from liberty to abundance;
    5. from abundance to complacency;
    6. from complacency to apathy;
    7. from apathy to dependence;
    8. from dependence back into bondage'

    Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 Presidential election:

    Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29
    Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans: 2,427,000
    Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million Republicans: 143 million
    Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats: 13.2 Republicans: 2.1

    Professor Olson adds: 'In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of this great country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare...' Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the 'complacency and apathy' phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the 'governmental dependency' phase.

    If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal's and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

    If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message. If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.

    WE LIVE IN THE LAND OF THE FREE,
    ONLY BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 3:54:35 PM

      Wow. You are intent on spamming every thread with your nonsense.

      • Posted By: star3 @ 10/14/2008 9:50:20 PM

        Whats the matter, Johnson---the truth too hard on you? Tsk, Tsk, run to papa Obama, he will "fix" everything for you---everything that ISN'T broken---YET, but then, you are allergic to truth---it hurts your ears, so I will let you find out
        for yourself.

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/15/2008 2:12:00 AM

          It has nothing to do with this article. This guy has posted the same BS on every Newsweek article.

          • Posted By: star3 @ 10/15/2008 11:17:11 PM

            I am beginning to think there is something to be said for having a king or queen instead of a president, at least, they don't have all this fussing going on because everybody is upset about a particular candidate, or party; no, they are busy having a party, watching us behave like idiots. Politics is a dirty business, regardless of which party you belong to, so all we can do is go with the one we feel will be most likely to do the better job. I, sometimes feel like Dorthy in the "Wizard of Oz"---I don't think we are in sync anymore, and I want to go home---where ever that may be. Sighhh...

          • Posted By: star3 @ 10/15/2008 10:25:20 PM

            O.K., fair enough; I have promised to check things out for myself from now on instead of responding to post that may or may not be true, we should all do that, of both parties. Thanks for the warning.

    • Posted By: star3 @ 10/14/2008 9:43:06 PM

      Bill, excellent post! Lets hope enough of us have learned from past history to prevent this scenario from happening again, but from the way things are shaping up, it seems too many people would rather follow the voice that promises to give them things instead of their working to earn them, and by the time they realize they have been dupped with empty promises, it will be too late. Anyway, good post, Bill!

      • Posted By: injustonepost @ 10/15/2008 1:40:38 PM

        I am bewildered by some of my fellow conservatives at what they consider to be thought provoking http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/tyler.asp. I thought I smelled a rat when I noticed that Professor Olsen (a real person) taught at Hemline University School of Law. Hemline? It turns out that Professor Olson did not do the research, there are inaccuracies in the research, and Alexander Tyler is not the correct person. Read the Snopes.com article for a fuller explanation.

        • Posted By: star3 @ 10/15/2008 10:20:09 PM

          Thank you, I will, and you are correct, we should all, of both sides, check things out for ourselves before accepting at face value things that are posted as fact. Good point, and point taken.

      • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/15/2008 2:11:22 AM

        Don't encourage off-topic posts.

  • Posted By: Bacalove @ 10/15/2008 12:11:15 PM

    You cannot put New wine into old bottles!

    Why is McCain being Deceitful about the fact that William Ayers' educational foundation was funded by Republicans, not Democrats, Republicans, who are now endorsing him?

    The Annenbergs who are Republicans, Bankrolled William Ayers with $50 million dollars. However, Walter and Leonore Annenberg weren???t just giving money to the educational foundation started by William Ayers, they were also giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Republican National Committee and various other Republican groups, as well as to a whole host of Republican candidates, including the following:

    George W. Bush $4000 - Mitt Romney $5000
    Strom Thurmond $1000 - Fred Thompson $500
    Rick Santorum $3000

    There are questions that are not being asked or answered such as --why would billionaire Republican philanthropists give millions of dollars to a program that was started by William Ayers, if he is such a scary figure and unrepentant? Why would George W., Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson and all those other Republicans accept money from the people who were funding this William Ayers-associated group? And, why won???t McCain discuss these connections between the Republican Party and Ayers?"

    Recently, McCain campaign put out a press release bragging about the fact that Leonore Annenberg has endorsed him for president. The very Leonore Annenberg who bankrolled William Ayers with millions of dollars is now backing McCain!

    Lastly, Republican Arnold Weber who served on the board of the CAC with Barack, who worked with William Ayers in the 90???s, has also donated at least $1000 to the McCain campaign. So you see, McCain is accepting money from associates of William Ayers, and so far has not given the money back. Why won't McCain come clean about these facts? Why is he being deceitful about this?

    http://www.republicansforobama.org/?q=node/3027

    • Posted By: star3 @ 10/15/2008 11:08:52 PM

      Barclove---Wanna bet? Jesus did when he turned water into wine, he probably used the same bottles. But I know what you mean, just couldn't resist...

  • Posted By: trazer222 @ 10/13/2008 10:16:00 PM

    He is an American hero who faught bravely for his country, always saluted the flag, and is a true American. Joe Biden eats at restaurants that closed 20 years ago and says as such he is in touch with the American people. Obama, cocaine user and friend of unrepented terrorists, wants to take money from the hard working American and give it to those who crazily invested in an overheated housing market. Shame on him!

    • Posted By: sirhc @ 10/14/2008 7:10:36 AM

      MCCAIN IS A HERO WHO HAS DECIDED TO SELL HIS SOUL TO KARL ROVE FOR THE PRESIDENCY. WHY IS WHERE BIDEN EATS A ISSUE? BECAUSE YOU GUYS CANNOT WIN ON THE ISSUES. BUSH WAS ALSO A COCAINE USER AND A COMPLETE DRUNK-AND THAT'S NOT TOO LONG AGO. HECK-HE ACTS LIKE IT NOW. OBAMA IS FRIEND'S WITH TERRORIST? HOW ABOUT RONALD REAGN BEING FRIENDS AND SHAKING HANDS WITH SADDAM AND HELPING SADDAM COME INTO POWER IN IRAQ?

      HOW ABOUT GEORGE BUSH BEING SO CLOSE TO THE BIN LADEN FAMILY THAT HIS NICK NAME IS "BUSH BIN LADEN."-CAN YOU HAVE A WORSE ASSOCIATION THAN OSAMA BIN LADEN?

      BY THE WAY-THE PICK OF SARAK QUAYLIN IS SO RIDICULOUS THAT IT'S REALLY INCOMPREHENSIBLE-WHAT A AIRHEAD

      • Posted By: star3 @ 10/14/2008 11:52:20 PM

        Do you know one of the books Obama reads is "America After The Fall." Somehow, i don't think the writer is refering to the season of the year; it was written by a Muslim author. It had better be a work of fiction, unless he wants the title of his next book to be: "The Tale Of Massacred Muslims".

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/15/2008 2:13:50 AM

          I suppose a good American would read Camus' "The Stranger". After all, the protaganist killed an Arab for no apparent reason.

          • Posted By: star3 @ 10/15/2008 10:41:08 PM

            Johnson, I will have to check on that one, as I am not familiar with it, but to kill anyone without just cause is wrong, so I would never condon that, but you have to admit we have reason to be suspicious of Muslims, since, the terrorist claim to be of that religion; thats human nature, fair or not. I see Muslims quite often when I am out shopping, and even a few who are employed in some of the stores, and I have no particular feeling about them one way or the other, just as they always seem polite enough to me, but there is an air of uncertainty surrounding them, so you can't blame people who aren't quite sure where they stand on this touchy issue.

  • Posted By: jjkk @ 10/14/2008 2:59:18 AM

    Here's an enlightened voter; Evax @ 10/13/2008 4:36:09 PM

    Comment: List of Palin's crimes = TRAP AN INNOCENT HUMAN SOUL IN A LIFELONG JAIL BY INTENTIONALLY BRINGING A DOWN' SYNDROME TO THE WORLD. STIR KKK EMOTIONS ON THE STUMPS"
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------

    How can you possibly talk about the KKK when your words are despicable. Just as bad as alter's DISABLED INFANT. What could possibly possess you to think something like this let alone post it in a public forum where it will live on forever? and then you talk about losing the campaign? What is wrong with you?

    • Posted By: star3 @ 10/14/2008 11:26:36 PM

      Ohh boy...here we go---the pretzel syndrom---twisting things in an attempt to make it look like its ALL the Republicans who are in the wrong, bur we are WAY too smart for your poisoned pretzels, so feed them to your brood of hungry little pigs who will swallow anything that appears to be in their favor. Ho Hum....G'night, don't let the elephants sneak into your dreams, now, you know we have bigh feet---and even bigger brains. Do try to grow one yourself.

      • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/15/2008 2:12:43 AM

        All Republicans aren't in the wrong, just most of them.

        • Posted By: star3 @ 10/15/2008 10:30:39 PM

          Thank you, Johnson, and not all Democrats are liberal, but the libs seem to have gained a strong hold in the party. Thats one reason, amonge oithers, that I changed parties. We need to stop accusing & abusing each other, and show respect for our differences, and try to disagree like mature Americans.

    • Posted By: Evax @ 10/14/2008 10:44:20 AM

      Palin's supporters yelled "treason; kill him; terrorist; Arab; etc." during recent campaign events. Although Palin did not cover her lipstick with a white mask, she created the climate and the conditions for fostering viscous attacks against decent Americans. Palin's abuse of power as a governor adds additional crimes to her cirme list. Palin will be remembered as human trash in American history. I respected McCain's integrity and courage as a POW in Vietnam. To demonstrate that he has not lost these qualities, McCain has to nix Palin immediately, at any costs.

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/15/2008 5:48:14 PM

    To all of the conservatives out there who think that Obama is a flaming liberal, I would like to remind you of what he did when he was elected President of the Harvard Law Review. The Law Review President gets to name ten individuals to write articles for the Review, and these ten people also get to control the content of the publication. All of the minorities and the liberals thought they finally had it made, that Obama would appoint ten left wing editors. Instead, Obama appointed three conservatives, three liberals and four moderates. That year the Law Review was critically acclaimed as the best run and best written Harvard publication in decades.

    So when he wins in November, don't freak out. Obama is a centrist and will appoint a balanced cabinet full of active people who will really get things done. Kind of like the way our multi-cultural society is supposed to be.

  • Posted By: Bluto123 @ 10/11/2008 5:32:22 PM

    Sorry Jonathan but you have it wrong, McCain was never the conservatives nominee, there were much better conservative candidates, such as Romney, or Fred Thompson which was my choice. McCain was broke, out of it, and heading back to Arizona until the democrats filled the all of you can vote primaries in New Hampshire and all the others. They all knew he was the weakest candidate, and that's why he is there. The only problem Obama has is why is McCain so close in the polls, and he isn't blowing McCain out of the water. It's because just like every other poll in a presidential election, people lie, or they just don't know who they will vote for, and they just blurt out a name. It was that way with Mondale, Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry, who were all ahead in every poll, and got blown out in the only poll that counts.
    So don't count the republicans out just yet. I don't think that we are dead yet, but the sentiment of that angry man in Wisconsin is when are WE going to fight back, when are WE going to use the tactics that the democrats have such a talent for. It's not just defeat the other guy, when it comes to the democrats, it decimate them, get them out of the way, destroy your opponent so that he will never come back. The republicans are just too polite, they don't mix it up enough, just like the angry man from Wisconsin said, "go after them, go get em". That is the sentiment of most rank and file republicans right now. We are tired of a kinder gentler, compassionate conservatism. We want a lot of partisanship, not a little.
    The independents like a good row too, they're independent for a reason, and it is because neither party will go to the lengths to raise their devotion to one or the other. I'm sure there are plenty of disgruntled ex-republicans that are independents now because they don't think the party is doing enough fighting back. Please excuse my grammar, and/or sentence structure I'm not a writer, but I hope I can get a point or two across. The elephant was basically walking away from McCain rather than crushing him until he picked Sarah Palin. That got everyone's attention in a hurry, and the elephant did an about face.

    • Posted By: NJ-BJ @ 10/15/2008 12:54:01 PM

      Unfortunately my African American paranoia makes me ask the question whether the angry man in Wisconsin is THINKING "How can WE be in the position of being beaten by a BLACK liberal." How dare the American public prefer a Black man?!!!" I know, I know; I'm just being paranoid. After 55+ years in this country thoughts like these are still necessary for me to survive. Better to be paranoid than to be surprised by reality.

    • Posted By: jarcher1 @ 10/11/2008 8:25:01 PM

      Ahhh, so the Democrats mounted their own operation chaos then. First I've heard about it, what reference will you provide for this jewel of information?. Republican's are too polite. ROTFLMAO. You and your buds be sure and stick to your course of obstructionism, it will finish the RepubliCON brand for sure. The country has big problems and the moment, due chiefly to RepubliCON fiscal philosophy from Reagan onwards. So if you want to help in the reconstruction, fine, there's a seat at the table for you, if not sit down and shut up. The country can ill afford 20% of the population throwing a temper tantrum for 8 years like they did after 1992, we have very large and very real problems this time around.

    • Posted By: simonanunhappydem @ 10/11/2008 5:56:59 PM

      Saying that Gore and Kerry lost at the poll that counts show utter ignorance to the facts. Gore won at the polls but lost at a politically motivated supreme court that ignored the will of the people. Same for Kerry if you correct for the clearly proven republican cheating in Ohio. The only thing I agree with is that republicans can not be counted out yet in this election: they will try to cheat and lie again to stay in power.

    • Posted By: OhioGal @ 10/11/2008 5:49:03 PM

      Bush has been neither compassionate or conservative. A true conservative would be fiscally responsible and not run up massive budget deficits. A true conservative wouldn't have started the drug prescription program for the elderly (isn't that socialism?). A true conservative wouldn't have started an unnecessary war but would have finished the war in Afghanistan. As for compassion, I can't say that I've seen that either.

  • Posted By: JWadle @ 10/15/2008 12:45:43 PM

    Mr. Alter:

    Congratulations on an excellent analysis of John McCain's failure to leverage his valid history as a maverick among Republicans.

    In my view as an Obama supporter, I am glad that he (McCain) took the tack that he did. Obama's lack of experience is a legitimate concern and would have been hard to overcome in the face of well-run campaign by the "old" McCain of 2000.

    Ironically, just as it is surprising and disappointing to see McCain succomb to his advisors' Rovian campaign plan, I believe we will all be surprised by what President Obama becomes once in office. I expect we will see a significant move toward a broadening middle by an effective uniter. Obama has the wisdom to judge what is doable and what will work. I think we will all be very pleasanly surprised.

    - John Wadle

  • Posted By: emmarcee @ 10/11/2008 5:05:15 PM

    Who played the financial markets to crash down for Obama's favor? THE TIMING WAS VERY CRITICAL. Right when Mccain was in the lead. How many "international " investors were involved? who is bent to make Barack Husein Obama the POTUS? fIRST THEY PLAYED THE energy crisis. WE beat them. Then they withdrew their holdings and support for our fianancial system. "AMERICA had it coming". WE entertained all these back stabbers who were more than ready to pull the money away from wall street market. All so legally. Govt had to step in to stop the short sale of uSA. YOu liberals who play with antiamerican terrorist coutries, we will let you know you also hold the other end of this stick.

    • Posted By: NJ-BJ @ 10/15/2008 12:43:35 PM

      If it is that easy to "PLAY THE FINANCIAL MARKETS..." why would anyone with that power need Obama? If they wanted to bring the country down, as I suppose you are alluding to, just crash the markets.
      If you want to crash an airplane while you could hypnotize the pilot and make him crash it, just use a gun or a bomb.

      Your may want to think through your conspiracy theories a little more before letting them out for air....

    • Posted By: getAgripUSA @ 10/12/2008 1:30:14 PM

      Anybody for a dose of rampant fear and hate. This guys got plenty.

    • Posted By: hexagon_sun @ 10/11/2008 7:46:28 PM

      What you just said has less credibility than that of 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and Loch Ness Monster "witnesses" put together. Way to show us all how smart you guys are.

    • Posted By: LL-star @ 10/11/2008 6:13:56 PM

      Posted By: emmarcee @ 10/11/2008 5:05:15 PM
      Comment: Who played the financial markets to crash down for Obama's favor? THE TIMING WAS VERY CRITICAL. Right when Mccain was in the lead.

      I think it was GOD.

  • Posted By: Domenic @ 10/15/2008 12:24:52 PM

    Dear Mr. Alter,

    I'm finding this article five days late; so much has happened since you wrote it. Yet, you have said so much so well here. Thank you for doing so.

    I'm there when you share your thoughts with "us" on MSNBC. I believe that "the rotting corpse of his party," which is "a dying Elephant," may signal a dramatic shift in American politics. You've called it.

    Only a landslide of historic proportions will make a big difference because it will signal a major shift in American thinking. A win for Obama will still be a win, yes, but for him or us to do what has to be done, the change will have to be large. Dramatic. Resounding. Think FDR in 1932. He swept into office in 1933 with One Hundred days that Shook the World and changed American politics and daily life for the next generation, indeed, for all future generations. I'd say, he saved Capitalism by introducing intelligent, social Reforms.

    I wonder if you believe, as I do, that Obama will have to do likewise. It may be too soon to "talk" about it (measuring the drapes in the White House), but not too soon to "think" about it.

    There is a dichotomy in the human mind that expresses itself in everything that we think and do. Left, right. Up, down. Left brain, right brain. Hence, the competing progressive vs. conservative politics and political "philosophies" that the mantra of "Change" describes. Today, "Change" may signal that we are living through what historians will one day describe as a major shift in American thinking, no doubt brought about by negative (financial, war) vs. positive (Internet, youth) forces. The balance may have tipped. If this is indeed what is happening, it will not be apparent to "us fish in the bowl" unless the glass breaks.

    If Democrats do not win the White House AND both Houses of Congress with historic majorities (whatever they might be), an Obama in the White House will nonetheless make a big difference, but the county will continue divided too closely to "make" my thesis. Yet, you have noted the first step:



    But the free-market party of Reagan is dead (thanks to the financial crisis) and the resentment party of Nixon (in the form of the ugly attacks unleashed by McCain and Sarah Palin) may find that its best days are behind it. Where is the party of McCain? The man who survived five and a half years as a Vietnam POW and a thousand political battles is being crushed by a dying elephant.


    I look forward to hearing your thoughts on MSNBC.

    Domenic Corsaro
    _________________________________________
    Domenic Corsaro
    Philadelphia, PA

    "Someone has to talk Bush out of the tree." - Evan Thomas, Newsweek (Hardball, MSNBC).
    Reply

    Forward

  • Posted By: Domenic @ 10/15/2008 12:24:11 PM

    Dear Mr. Alter,

    I'm finding this article five days late; so much has happened since you wrote it. Yet, you have said so much so well here. Thank you for doing so.

    I'm there when you share your thoughts with "us" on MSNBC. I believe that "the rotting corpse of his party," which is "a dying Elephant," may signal a dramatic shift in American politics. You've called it.

    Only a landslide of historic proportions will make a big difference because it will signal a major shift in American thinking. A win for Obama will still be a win, yes, but for him or us to do what has to be done, the change will have to be large. Dramatic. Resounding. Think FDR in 1932. He swept into office in 1933 with One Hundred days that Shook the World and changed American politics and daily life for the next generation, indeed, for all future generations. I'd say, he saved Capitalism by introducing intelligent, social Reforms.

    I wonder if you believe, as I do, that Obama will have to do likewise. It may be too soon to "talk" about it (measuring the drapes in the White House), but not too soon to "think" about it.

    There is a dichotomy in the human mind that expresses itself in everything that we think and do. Left, right. Up, down. Left brain, right brain. Hence, the competing progressive vs. conservative politics and political "philosophies" that the mantra of "Change" describes. Today, "Change" may signal that we are living through what historians will one day describe as a major shift in American thinking, no doubt brought about by negative (financial, war) vs. positive (Internet, youth) forces. The balance may have tipped. If this is indeed what is happening, it will not be apparent to "us fish in the bowl" unless the glass breaks.

    If Democrats do not win the White House AND both Houses of Congress with historic majorities (whatever they might be), an Obama in the White House will nonetheless make a big difference, but the county will continue divided too closely to "make" my thesis. Yet, you have noted the first step:



    But the free-market party of Reagan is dead (thanks to the financial crisis) and the resentment party of Nixon (in the form of the ugly attacks unleashed by McCain and Sarah Palin) may find that its best days are behind it. Where is the party of McCain? The man who survived five and a half years as a Vietnam POW and a thousand political battles is being crushed by a dying elephant.


    I look forward to hearing your thoughts on MSNBC.

    Domenic Corsaro
    _________________________________________
    Domenic Corsaro
    Philadelphia, PA

    "Someone has to talk Bush out of the tree." - Evan Thomas, Newsweek (Hardball, MSNBC).
    Reply

    Forward

  • Posted By: obared4444 @ 10/15/2008 11:46:31 AM

    Abridging freedom of speech in the guise of a noble cause and setting an agenda that will esconse " the moneylendings into a higher rate of receivable inerest is exactly where Obama's policies are going to lead
    us. While tighter credit may be unavoidable in the short term if McCain is elected, it will not be the only channel for investment. We are embarking on a course for more fatuous and vain than what the "self-seekers" of finance got us into if Obama is elected. I'd like to add that FDR had a resume that was more
    than a career in acadamia, community organizing and a law firm gig that was no more than showing up at the office.

  • Posted By: summerfun @ 10/15/2008 10:34:03 AM

    I am an Independent who loved McCain in 2000 but his selection of Palin shows poor judgment. Not only is she not qualified but she has poor judgment. What mother encourages her child to have a child and on top of it get married to a High School drop out. If she doesn't believe in abortion than she have the baby given up for adoption. Children having children is almost a form of child abuse. Furthermore as a Catholic birth control is the same as abortion. The pill and IUD prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus. Per Palin and the Catholic church birth control is murder. Why isn't this ever talked about by the media? You are all to afraid to investigate "Right to Life's" goal of outlawing abortion and birth control.

  • Posted By: thehappyamerican @ 10/13/2008 2:44:39 PM

    Obama is in "control" of HIS CAMPAIGN? His campaign is all about getting a President in the White House sympathetic to ACORN and other 60's radical Communist wannabes!
    The goal of these groups in association of community organizers ,is to take over a major political party like the weathermen (ACORN,today) took over the Students for a Democratic Society in 1969. They DNC is the target and Obama is a PRODUCT!
    And a flawed one! Like Newsweek!

    • Posted By: star3 @ 10/13/2008 8:18:47 PM

      Happy American, agree with your post, and while McCain may not meet everybody;s expectations of what a "Maverick" is, he has mellowed some.perhaps, but he is still a maverick at heart, and once a maverick, always a maverick, so he will have some strong ideas, I know, which he will put into place once he is, officially, our president. The left will always try to twist things in their favor, but we are smart people here on the right, so we can see through that facade.

      • Posted By: marksgershenson @ 10/13/2008 11:39:52 PM

        The article repigs do not want you to see

        http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain/page/1

        • Posted By: star3 @ 10/14/2008 10:14:53 PM

          Mark, Mark, Mark---Rolling Stone?! Get Real!

          • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/15/2008 2:17:32 AM

            The truth is the truth. If you can't rebut the facts, then eschew the source.

    • Posted By: jjkk @ 10/14/2008 3:06:25 AM

      The DNC selected him back in 2006 and then moved up the SC primary (not MI & FL) so obama could get the black vote behind him. The DNC is also helping obama fight a law suit filed by PHILIP BERG alleging that Obama is not an American citizen and that his birth certificate is a fraud. I'm not saying it holds credence but it's out there. And Berg is a lawyer who is also a Democrat. Suit filed 8-21-08. go to you tube and look up "I invented the Internet October surprise. it was on the viral video site as well.

      • Posted By: jjkk @ 10/14/2008 3:27:12 AM

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA6_k3NtXZs
        October Surprise by Illuminatitv

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 3:59:05 PM

          http://www.fightthesmears.com

  • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/13/2008 10:11:49 AM

    Sarah Palin is a traitor to America and to her party.

    Palins un-American activities
    http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/10/07/palins_unamerican/index.html

    Alaskan Independence Party chairwoman Lynette Clark talks about why she does not identify herself as an American, and about her kindred spirit Sarah Palin.
    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/09/10/alaska_secession/index.html

    The pastor who clashed with Palin
    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/09/15/bess/index.html

    Troopergate Report Concludes Palin Abused Power. Full 263 Page report here???
    http://download2.legis.state.ak.us/DOWNLOAD.pdf

    Palins Attack On Obamas Patriotism Legitimizes Questions About her Association With Group Founded By America-Hating Secessionist
    http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/palins_attack_on_obamas_patrio.php

    Palin And The Alaska Independence Party
    http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/the_alaska_independence_party.php

    • Posted By: star3 @ 10/14/2008 11:35:06 PM

      Wendy, unless you can back up the utterings from your humming bird mouth & your mocking bird ass, are you even aware that those kinds of remarks can get you sued for slander? Sarah Palin has plenty of false aligations she could sue for if she chooses to, including the trashy movie being made with some fly by night amature actress, so watch it.

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 10/13/2008 3:55:04 PM

    Yikes. More of that ''rotting corpse''again. [which we have heard no fewer than seven times in the last two months,all used by liberal and leftwinged hacks to describe the GOP].

    Not on a bet. The reason why the GOP survives is due to Alters last paragraph noting that the candidate must stand ''with his party'',as the anti-Maverick. As Obama has a 96% trackrecord of doing so,all he can do with a Democrat majority is to create a kick in the American brainpan by a jackass,rather than they being ''crushed by an elephant''. Thus will the GOP minority be counted upon to battle Democrat excess when it arises.
    Consider that FDR-like,we were promised a ''new era in government'',''a draining of the swamp'' and ''new accountability'' with the accession of the Democrat majority in Congress.
    We got nothing. Earmarks continue to be kept secret. Political corruption has reached the highest pinnacles of committee chairmanships with investigations being launched against Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd by a federal grand jury in California getting to the bottom of the COUNTRYWIDE contributions to the mortgage disaster,another one underway with the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee Charlie Rangel,a House coverup of a sordid sex affair and blackmail mess aimed at of all people,Florida Democrat Tim Mahoney,who ran his ''Faith and Family''campaign on the back of the man he replaced..... GOP Rep. Mark Foley.
    Lobbyists by the thousands are crawling all over K St. Reid and Pelosi have proven themselves to be among the worst congressional leaders in the last century,totally unable to keep party discipline,unable to even govern. Alter blindly ignores the patent fact that the ''greedheads''eminate from his own party,in total and complete thrall to the FANNIE,FREDDIE,INDYMAC,LEHMAN,MBNA,and big firm moneymen,who ably helped to create this disaster.[Neither Alter nor NEWSWEAK at large have spent a single ounce of ink registering the news-worthy facts that relate to Barney Franks,Artur Davis',Maxine Waters,Chris Dodds,Barack Obamas,William Clays,Jesse Jackson Jrs,Jan Scharkowskies,or Sheila Jackson Lees direct involvement with FANNIE and FREDDIE].
    Thus does Alter perform an ultimately useless act in his one-sided quest to get his man in. He ignores the great fall of the Democrat party of FDRs,day,invoking him as a panecea,a band-aid on a brain tumor,now affecting his party. Make no mistake. The liberalism of Roosevelt can in no way be compared to the post-Vietnam creature it has become. Alter looks to the ''New-New Deal''. What he [and all of us ] will get,is a thing that will lead to a further erosion of American faith,power,economic strength[as even Howard Fineman now worries over],and geo-political capability.

    • Posted By: sirhc @ 10/13/2008 6:09:28 PM

      YOU FORGET A FEW CONVENIENT FACTS

      1. THE REPUBLICANS HAVE RAN THE COUNTRY SINCE THE YEAR 2000. YOU GUYS POLITICS IS DYING BECAUSE TO QUOTE GEORGE H. BUSH-"THE TRICKLE DOWN THEORY IS VODOO ECONOMICS" HE SAID THAT IN RONALD REAGAN'S FACE AND HE WAS 1000% CORRECT. WHY ELSE WOULD A HALF BLACK JUNIOR SENATOR WITH A FOREIGN NAME BE BEATING THE HELL OUT OF A WAR HERO DURING A TIME OF WAR IN THE POLLS? PEOPLE WANT THEIR MONEY RIGHT AND MCCAIN IS ECONOMICALLY AS IGNORANT AS BUSH................MAYBE MORE SO.

      2. FORGET BUSH DIDN'T VETO 1-NOT ^*#^)%&^ 1 RIDICULOUS SPENDING BILL FROM THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESS FROM 2001-2002? BILLS SO RIDICULOUS THAT THE LIBERAL WING OF THE DEMOCRATS WERE SAYNG WTF?

      3. 4 BILLION A WEEK IN A WAR THAT "REPUBLICANS" LIED US INTO

      4. BUSH GIVING TAX BREAKS "TO" COMPANIES IF THEY OUTSOURCED. WONDER WHY EVERYTIME YOU CALL ABOUT YOUR FINANCES, CABLE,....ETC AND HEAR A VOICE FROM INDIA FOR THE LAST 5 YEARS?-THAT'S WHY

      5. THE TOP 4 REPUBLICANS IN THE COUNTRY-BUSH, CHENEY, BERNANKE, PAULSON CREATED AND PUSH A 700 BILLION SOCIALIST BILL DOWN EVERYONE'S THROATS.

      REPUBLICANS HAD THEIR CHANCES-YOU BLEW IT. TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR ACTIONS.

      • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 10/14/2008 4:10:31 PM

        Eh? How does it figure that the Republicans control the Legislative Branch from which all spending derives? You are behind the times here Mr.All Caps.

        You forget that your ''ridiculous spending bills''were not only supported by Democrats,but they helped WRITE the bills! [Kennedys 2001 Education Bill and the 2002 Farm Bill with Kent Conrad, the bloat of which was only exceeded by the 2007 Farm Bill in what have been identified as one of the best times for farmers in the last century[due primarily to rising corn costs,which are being turned into Ethanol],which was pushed by the Democrats.

        There remains no evidence extant that this nation was ''lied''into a war in Iraq. The precise same platforms that existed in 2003 were also a portion of the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act,then embraced by a majority of Democrats.

        Bush gave ''tax breaks''to everyone. Not merely the ''outsourced''and if you wish to see how bad it is actually going to get,just wait until an all-Democrat show chucks TAFT-HARTLEY,in payback to their union masters,ups mining royalties, and completes the ruination of this economy.

        Which would have never been ''pushed''had it not been for REPUBLICANS in the House![as Alter himself observes in the above article].

        Republicans did indeed ''blow it''. The Democrats,are taking a bad scene and making it even worse however,thus the break between FDRs day and this one is plain to see.

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 4:55:27 PM

          "There remains no evidence extant that this nation was ''lied''into a war in Iraq."

          Denial ain't just a river in Egypt. There is tons of evidence. Why don't you read "
          The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" by Vincent Bugliosi and educate yourself.

          • Posted By: star3 @ 10/14/2008 10:12:19 PM

            LOL LOL LOL! Vincent Bugliosi!! LOL! LOL! Yeah...like everyone just waits in line for his version of "truth". Give it up, everyone knows Obama is one of the biggest liberals to ever hit the scene, and only tail wagging, tounge lapping morons follow him, so let them follow him right into the pits of hades, but we will pray for you to come to your senses before its too late. Pure love has never harmed anyone, but putrid hatred does.

          • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 10/14/2008 7:49:28 PM

            A screed by the partisan Bugliosi? No thanks. Had you found anything,you,[and he],would have already proferred it in no fewer than four separate investigations dealing with pre-war intelligence and the al Qaeda threat in Iraq[or lack thereof] in the following:

            The 9/11 Commission Report www.9/11commission.gov

            The Senate Select Committee on Iraq Pre War Intelligence 2004 www.senate.gov

            The Senate Select Committee on Iraq Pre-War Intelligence 2006 www.senate.gov

            Pre-War Intelligence Assessments About Postwar Iraq 2007 www.senate.gov

            And the Democrat-led Phase II of the Senate Select Committee on Iraq Pre War Intelligence. www.senate.gov

            ...Yet in no place in any of these tome-sized PDF files does it ever say that Bush deliberately ''lied''to get us into Iraq. This is a matter or partisan opinion. It has not been shown to be an indisputable fact.


            Oh. And Roosevelt was inaugurated President in March of 1933 and began his first term from that moment. Not ''1934''.....deary.

            • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 8:54:02 PM

              A real investigation hasn't been conducted. Unfortunately, the Democrats have sat on their hands on this one due to their promise not to impeach prior to the 2006 drubbing they handed the Republicans. Hopefully, after Obama takes office some real investigation can go on. Thankfully, Bush will be a private citizen at that point and thus will have no shield against prosecution for his crimes.

              If you don't like Bugliosi's book, which is very good, there are lots more that go into detail how intelligence was twisted, distorted and abused in order to get us into war. This is not rocket science. It's been documented over and over again.

              By the way, the question that the press should be asking both candidates is this "Will you pardon George W. Bush and Dick Cheney?" I would love to see McCain's answer to that one.

  • Posted By: star3 @ 10/14/2008 9:35:41 PM

    The elephant has not crushed anyone, but the Jackass sure has dumped a load of ***!

  • Posted By: pasesseson @ 10/11/2008 4:32:59 PM

    Good article. McCain is weak, but not just in failing to control the party and the choice of his running mate. He is weak because he does not really know who HE is. Every time he asks, Who is the real Obama? I see right into the core of his heart, an organ once brave and now so covetous of the Presidency that instead of being the maverick he claims to be (not true, by any stretch) and standing his ground, he stands in a hole his essential weakness has dug for him. He has gone from hero to zero in my book. And, what is more, I do fea for his mental health as evidenced by classic PTSD symptoms and flashbacks as evidenced by his 'my fellow prisoners' statement last week rather than 'my fellow americans.' Poor boy. As for Pail, or Beyond thePalin as she is known - weak weak weak and laughable, except that she is dangerous, too.

    a patriot

    • Posted By: Pallisor @ 10/12/2008 11:51:40 AM

      Your pathetic post is a good reflection of your pathetic opinion.

      • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 5:22:30 PM

        Brilliant retort. You are an even more pathetic debater than McCain, and that's saying something.

    • Posted By: getAgripUSA @ 10/12/2008 1:37:58 PM

      hmmmmm at least he wont vote McCain....

    • Posted By: le114424 @ 10/11/2008 5:18:36 PM

      You see right into his heart? Please do not post that sort of drivel as it embarrasses all of us!

  • Posted By: pasesseson @ 10/11/2008 4:36:07 PM

    good article. good analysis. but it does not go far enough. mccain's real weakness is his covetousness of the presidency at any cost. he asks, Who is Obama? but the truth is, the man does not know who HE is. He shifts left foot and right foot like he's standing outside the men's room - and he is, the room for real men who know who they are, are proud of it, and will not be budged by opinions, political manipulators, handlers, or even the party bosses. mccain has gone from hereo to zero - and that is what his weakness in the face of the booses of the elephant party are.

    • Posted By: Pallisor @ 10/12/2008 11:52:44 AM

      The "booses" in the republican party don't control McCain.

      • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/14/2008 5:21:47 PM

        The Palin pick says otherwise.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse