An interesting trend is to read the comments on these sort of articles and youtube videos. There is an incredible support for Obama. (this comment being one of them!)
An interesting trend is to read the comments on these sort of articles and youtube videos. There is an incredible support for Obama. (this comment being one of them!)
A teacher in Elmira , New York , who is a McCain supporter, asked her 4th grade class, "How many of you are McCain fans?" Not really knowing what a McCain fan is, but wanting to be liked by the teacher, all the kids raised their hands, except for Little Johnny. The teacher asked Little Johnny why he has decided to be different.
Little Johnny said, "Because I'm not a McCain fan." The teacher asked, "Why aren't you a McCain fan?" Johnny said, "Because I'm a Democrat. "The teacher asked him why he's a Democrat. Little Johnny answered, "Well, my Mom's a Democrat and my Dad's a Democrat, so I'm a Democrat." Annoyed by this answer, the teacher asked, "If your mom was a moron and your dad was an idiot, what would that make you?" With a big smile, Little Johnny replied, "That would make me a McCain fan."
I believe that the public has shown that we much prefer Obama's campaign. Barack Obama has continued to be calm, collected, honest, and knowledgeable - shall I go on? He has continued to talk about the issues while McCain's campaign has continued the mud-slinging and smear campaign. McCain has become a grumpy, dottering old man with his little attack dog Palin by his side. I believe Sarah's drool has clouded her already clouded brain. I'll take Barack's CHANGE CAMPAIGN any day over McCain & Palin's dodging the issuing and smear tactics.
Let's see, he campaigns just like Rove, uses his tactics, lies and distorts the truth. Hum, what the hell else are we supposed to think? He's Rove Jr.
Well, as a liberal, I certainly hope that other GOP candidates hire Mr.Schmidt in the future.
watching these post degenerate over the last few weeks has been lock step with Mr. Mccain's slow slide.. sorry gop supporters try to take the next 4 1/2 years in stride huh
HolyRoller, JoseMarti and similar posters: Do me, yourself and the GOP Party a favor: Put just half the effort that you put into bashing Obama and the Democrats into praising the real values of the Republican Party and it's ticket if you want to get McCain elected. All of this peurile and acrimonious name calling, smearing and outright antagonization is not helping our cause, makes the conservative base look childish, unintelligent, frightened and self serving. It turns off Independent voters and so basically serves the Dem's interests.
Now we know who the person is behind the "madness" ....Schmidt may have got away with the previous elections, but not this one...It's an uphill battle that cannot excuse the failures already with the McCain camp , the false ads and McCains zero dignity. You cannot repair these open wounds.... It's all clear that all of you will do 'anything' to win this election - even if it costs your soul.
http://politicaladattacks.blogspot.com/
Thank you for this article. I am an Obama supporter and there is a tendency to forget that real human beings are on all sides. I voted for President Bush in 2000 and 2004 on idealogy but this time I'm voting purely on issues. I admire Senator McCain but the "maverick" title ceased reigning true when he selected the political team that smeared him in 2000 and picked probably the least qualified Republican in the country for VP. I, along with many others believe that had he run the campaign he ran in 2000, he would probably be ahead because of lingering questions about Senator Obama. I hope there are others on Senator McCain's team who are taking stock and rethinking some of their tactics but in the event there are not, it's nice to read another side of Steve Schmidt.
Regardless if this campaign...on both sides...has turned into an exercise in fingerpointing, we MUST remember the issues. Those issues aren't all about our economy. The man who ends up in the White House will have to deal with the huge issues surrounding foreign policy, homeland security, military strategy in Iraq and Afghanistan, issues with Iran, etc.. That is where John McCain shines. That is the man who has the knowledge and years of experience to deal with the hard issues facing us all. Make no mistake...Obama is not ready for the White House where foreign policy is concerned, and that should be a big red flag to every voter in the United States! In the next 4 years, our President will not only be dealing with our country's economic issues, but he WILL have to make some strategic decisions that will affect people, worldwide. Obama is not that man...he is not ready to lead our country, nor to be the most powerful leader in the world. McCain has my vote, and I'm working hard to get all those around me to vote the same.
Kathleen5. It's the 21st century. No longer about 'experience'. The new currency is capacity to lead.
Better organisation improving knowledge management, including brainstorming ideas. Then the terrorists will not get us anymore. We'll be back in the lead. Learn to rely blazing new trails and not - EXPERIENCE.
To keep America at the bleeding edge of society, we need to lead again NOT; 'My Friends i shall put an end to earmarks'. ...guess who voted for it 'that one'.
I have tried to keep the idea as succinct as possible. Do let me know if you miss any nuances. I'm quite happy to elaborate.
Imagine you bein a person of color in the 50's and 60's and being asked to wait for your rigths? Could you have waited? It was not by the GOP that blacks got their rights, How patriotic of Mr.Schmidt, to tell gays to wait, how can you be a gay Republican when your own party is trying to destroy every thing you stand for? As evidence of the Raging bigotry of most of the GOP (Mr.Schmidt ) Hep Karl Rove use gays as a wedge in the last election, and the hateful speeches of Sarah Palin are nothing new, same tactics use in 2004, And we are supposed to trust these people , the ones that gave us W? cHENEY? tOM dELAY, nEWT? please, go sell your crazies someplace else.lastlast election.
Imagine if you were a black person in the 5o's and 60's and you had to wait for your rights? How deceitful and cowardly to ask gay supporters to wait, Don't gay republicans get it that their party wants none of them? That party is as we can clearly see from the event of McCain with all the hateful and way false advertising that Schmidt,Rove,Palin, Cheney and their like are killing the GOP, THE PARTY OF LINCOLN, HOW PATHETIC AND SAD.
I would question the right of anyone to distort facts (or engage in Perception Management)
to the detriment of the United States of America and it's citizens - as well as bringing harm
to the World. Winning is not an option in the path to becomming the President of the USA.
Qualifications - current qualifications shaped by experience and manifested by judgment -
are.
I would question the right of anyone to distort facts (or engage in Perception Management)
to the detriment of the United States of America and it's citizens - as well as bringing harm
to the World. Winning is not an option in the path to becomming the President of the USA.
Qualifications - current qualifications shaped by experience and manifested by judgment -
are.
I would question the right of anyone to distort facts (or engage in Perception Management)
to the detriment of the United States of America and it's citizens - as well as bringing harm
to the World. Winning is not an option in the path to becomming the President of the USA.
Qualifications - current qualifications shaped by experience and manifested by judgment -
are.
I should have clarified my point: like we should believe anything she says about Schmidt -- because all she's trying to do is absolve McCain from any wrong-doing and obvious hate-mongering he has APPROVED in this election. She's trying to give him an out... poor McCain. Perhaps she really misses that tire swing?
http://girlsgone.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/talking-points-memo-swinging-on-the-tire/
Barf. This reporter, one Holly Bailey, once spent an afternoon drinking white wine and swinging on a tire (then falling off visibly drunk) at McCain's Sedona ranch. Yeah, like we should believe anything she says about the GOP slimer's campaign.
http://girlsgone.wordpress.com/2008/09/20/holly-bailey-in-search-of-the-real-cindy-mccain-newsweek-politics-campaign-2008-newsweekcom/
So, Schmidt doesn't like being thought of as Rove? Then he should stop acting like him. That McCain's campaign has sunk so low that it brings out the worst in Americans speaks volumes about the character of the candidate and the campaign managers.
I just want to be sure I understand you correctly. If McCain had been hanging out and doing stuff with KKK guys over the last 15 years or so, it would NOT be an issue for you or Obama's campaign, right? Just want to make sure we're on the same page. So if Obama got upset about it, he'd be playing dirty, right?
whocaresanymore2008, I think you're comparing apples to oranges. Obama and Ayers served on an education reform board together - a board that was selected by a Republican head of the Annenberg Foundation. Are you accusing all of the Republicans and Democrats other than Obama sitting on the board of also "palling around with a terrorist?" Obama never selected Ayers as a member of the board and Ayers is not an advisor to the Obama campaign. And considering the fact that Ayers committed his acts more than 40 years ago, I still don't see how his actions are relevant to Obama and why Obama should be held responsible for Ayers' actions. McCain has also been around shady people in his past, but I don't think McCain should be held responsible for those actions as well. And if you're going to talk about the KKK issue, if McCain simply knew a former klansman through sitting on a board with him, I wouldn't care. I would care if McCain wore that hood right along with him, however. The guilt by association is petty and irrelevant.
Like I said, McCain/Palin/Schmidt have brought out the worst in people.
Can we please talk about real issues? This year I'm switching from voting Republican like I always have and I am now going to vote Obama. Why? Because crazies have taken over the Republican party. The Democratic party used to be the party of crazies, but it's as though Bush has somehow stolen the party that my family believed held the ideals of America and turned that party into trash.
Obama is not muslim, is not a terrorist, is not a socialist and not a communist. He is not advocating wealth redistribution. We have a national debt from hell (a deferred tax brought on by the past Republican presidents... yes we can admit to our mistakes). And if we don't pay it now then our children will even more so.
So guess what. The poor can't pay more. The middle class can't pay much more. The rich spend money to find every loophole they can so they don't have to pay taxes. So if fixing America means having to have those that benefit the most off of Lady Liberty give a little more back, then so be it! we need to fix our national debt before the country gets in any more debt to China. Or else we WILL be a communist country and we can then only blame ourselves.
And the rich guy keeps you in a job. When Obama takes over (God help us). there won't be any job for you to keep.
jfmccann: The idea that the rich give people jobs is a bit of a ludicrous statement given the state of the economy. Unemployment is higher than 6%, and considering that they are operating under Republican tax cuts, there's no excuse. That's the same "trickle-down" effect the Republicans keep harping about. Did you ever stop to think that if the middle-class had more disposable income they would be more likely to go out and actually spend it? Businesses make money when people go out to eat, buy clothes and gifts, and solicit services. Clearly the rich are not carrying the economy. Most businesses will simply capitalize on higher income and won't hire more people if it isn't warranted. Take the oil companies as an example. With all the record profits they've received (tax cuts or not), you would think they would spend their earnings to maybe hire more workers or explore for more oil. What did they do? Go out and bought back their stock, thereby reducing the number of outstanding stock and driving up the price, purely to satisfy their stockholders by making them richer. What was your argument about rich people giving jobs again?
um... I think the rich as a group pay the majority of taxes in this country.. so maybe that's not such a swell idea to increase their burden. The reason they're rich is mostly because they're smart and they probably will find even better ways to avoid the taxes, so it will probably even hurt us more in the long run.
I am a registered Republican, but I came out of the primaries as an Undecided Voter. Then the Republican Party selected the dangerously unqualified and ruthlessly ambitious Sarah Palin as their VP nominee and I became a Decided Voter, for Barack Obama. I live in Ohio, so I requested an early ballot to give me time to research some of the local races. However, after hearing one too many of the ???pallin??? around with terrorists??? lies, I picked up my ballot and voted a straight Democratic ticket. I know that is not an intelligent way to vote, but I don???t know any other way to send the message to the Republican Party ??? if this is the best you can do, you will not get another vote from me!
I may vote a straight Democratic ticket as well for the first time in my life too. I hate to give Congressional Democrats that much power - I think a lot of them are awful too - but my Democratic Senators are good, and somehow this tide of nativism and hatred and ignorance of people who are different has to *stop*.
This whole "kill him" thing at a public rally - that's too far. Way too far. It's good that the Secret Service is investigating - hopefully they have something, *anything* to go on - and it's inexcusable for these people to claim patriotism while inciting violence on their countrymen in the town square.
Though it's all very quintessentially, historically American, I suppose. The Irish-nativist conflicts of the 1850's and 1860's in New York, Tammany Hall, etc...and even further, back to the days of Jefferson. I liked one of the other articles' descriptions of the 1780's era attack ads, something about the streets running wild with criminals and et cetera.
1760 or 2008, a moral panic is a moral panic, and a sadly effective example of the darker side of populism in any era.
I can see your point in a way. The audience name calling. But you say your Democratic Reps are decent? So this crisis wasn't caused by greedy Democrats? And a few bad Republican's too? I see. Is understandable how many feel about the dirty steps of being a politician running for Pres. But to say that Democrats that are running the show are decent. Both parties have some rats that need to be trapped. Bailout? Hope you didn't forget that......... Sorry, not trying to undermind you, just saying how I feel.
So you're dumb enough to think obama has plenty of experience?? God help this country of ours, before it is no longer ours.
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss