Carolyn Kaster / AP
Satisfied? Now? Who are these people?
VIEWPOINT

It’s Just a Flesh Wound

The vast majority of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction of the country. So who are the 10 percent who think everything is A-OK?

 
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

The new NEWSWEEK poll shows that 86 percent of adult Americans are "dissatisfied with the way things are going" in this country. That is a shocking number, but what's even more incredible is that 10 percent of American citizens continue to be "satisfied." Consider the implication: more than 22 million men and women think the country is on the right track.


Who are these people? One in 10 Americans can't be repo men or Bush relatives. Satisfied? Now? Nobody's that Republican. Do these 10 percenters live in caves without TV, magazines, newspapers and the Internet—yet somehow still have a phone so that pollsters can reach them? And if you lived in a cave without HBO, would you really be "satisfied"?
The obvious guess is that the responders misunderstood the question. So maybe a few old ladies thought the nice NEWSWEEK pollster said, "Are you sad it's tied?" And they said,  "Yes," because they thought their guy had a big lead. If that's true, Gallup had the same problem: their poll found 9 percent were satisfied.

Meanwhile people are selling their gold teeth and losing their homes. Corporate behemoths like Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns—even Linens 'n Things—have been swallowed up or bitten the dust. EBay is laying people off, the Postal Service is talking about layoffs—and yet over 22 million people are satisfied with how things are going? I guess if you worked for Bed, Bath & Beyond, you'd be happy about the Linens 'n Things thing, but is that kind of schadenfreude good for America?

Maybe the people who are satisfied just can't admit to what's happening. Seriously, who could have predicted that giving out loans like Halloween candy to people with mini-salaries to buy mini-mansions—who then used their home equity to buy gas-guzzling Hummers—would ever backfire?

"Satisfied" is not a puny word. It's what you'd say after a great steak dinner or when your team wins the World Series. So perhaps these people are just eternal optimists, the type who make Norman Vincent Peale look like Sylvia Plath. We all have friends who say stuff like, "Turn that frown upside down," or mimic the woman from the movie "Office Space" who said, "Uh-oh, sounds like somebody's got a case of the Mun-days."

It's easy to keep bloviating about these mysterious 10 percenters from afar … which is why I've been doing it. But in these heady times, when mainstream journalism strides like a colossus across the American landscape, NEWSWEEK spared no expense or effort to get the real story—so I took the elevator downstairs, walked a block to the White House and talked to some tourists.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: ReefBreak @ 10/25/2008 12:28:46 PM

    Steve,

    I think you missed an important group of Bush supporters - as follows:

    In 1999 - when Bush was being selected by the 'powers that be' to run for president, oil was trading for ~$10 / bbl. It costs about $7
    to pump it out of the ground and transport it to a refinery here in the US. So profits were thin in the oil patch.

    Bush's financial backers said "We'll finance your run for the Whitehouse, but you've GOT TO GET THE PRICE OF OIL UP!"

    On that account, Bush has been the best in history at inflating that asset class. Just think in your life if you had an investment
    that increased by a factor of 10-15 times in 8 years - would you be happy? YOU BETCHA !

    Further, people of relatively modest means can own oil wells. There are many small drilling companies where you can put up $50,000 or more
    and own a share of a $3-5 million syndication of a small group of wells - usually 5 - 10.

    I have participated in these investments, and while i'm not a Bush supporter, I do think he has done a masterful job of increasing the
    price of crude oil.

    ReefBreak




    In

  • Posted By: Mark_W @ 10/20/2008 8:03:25 PM

    "Smarter": Which party held the House of Representatives and the Senate between 1994 and 2006? Which party had complete control by holding the White House, Senate, and House between 2000 and 2006? Hmmm... the same party that has appointed 7 of the 9 Supreme Court Justices?

    Sorry "Smarter", I'm just not willing to somehow blame this mess on the liberals this time. You may think I'm one of them, but I'm actually a relatively conservative Republican myself. I was delighted when the Republicans took over in 2000 -- thinking that we'd finally get back to an era of more limited government with reduced federal spending. Sadly, that was wrong. Once the Republicans got control, they went on a spending spree that would make a drunken Democrat blush -- and massively expanded the government.

    One thing is now clear: The Democrats love to spend money, the Republicans love to spend money. Maybe they spend on different things, but both love to spend that tax money. The Democrats tax now & spend, the Republicans borrow now and spend, depending on future tax increases to pay for it. Sad, sad, sad.

  • Posted By: bighappy @ 10/18/2008 5:37:46 PM

    Why not to be satisfied?
    I was very diissatisfied few years ago, when foolish people like crazy chased extremely overpriced houses and hired pens assured us that it is because US experiences shortage of houses. Why should I be unhappy now, when all those morons are out of business and foreclosed properties are more than affordable now?
    I was very dissatisfied when oil price was sky high, all those terrorists and leftist dictators got ptofit from it, and our liberals prevented from drilling our own oil. Now oil price is much lower and keeps going down, and even Obama made some drilling concessions.
    I was very dissatisfied that 4 and even 8 years ago americans new that Bush Jr was an idiot and still kepr nominating and electing him, because it was american traditions (envy to smarts?) to elect regular morons except desperate times. Now I an satisfied that at least in 4 years we will have smart President.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg