'Health' of the Mother

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: whichwitch @ 10/18/2008 12:45:22 AM

    having watching a cousin suffer through the final 5 1/2 months of a pregnacy that was doomed to end in an infant funeral due to a condition that left the "infant" with no brain or brain stem at all; in other words that left this 'unborn' with no life expectancy once was it was separated from it's host womb ( yeah---Mother)---in fact with not even enough brsin stem to even allow it to breathe, but that the circumstances of-- where she lived--- to force her to carry to full term and then birth what would never be anything more than a pre-known still-birth, THAT I found so cruel, as to be beyond belief. It took 5 years for that poor woman to even contemplate risking another pregnancy. To this day she still harbors feelings that she's to blame.
    I'd rather blame any system thst fordes a woman to carrry any pregnacy to that length in the name of being " Pro-Life" It makes it seem that all w woman are is walking womb factories.

    • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/18/2008 2:02:18 AM

      Obama says it is better to go inside the womb, puncture it's skull, and suck it's brain out, or if it lives, just let it die and don't help it.

      • Posted By: ProMomOf6 @ 10/18/2008 5:39:12 PM

        Ji, Johnson, I find your posts unsavory. You go into detail to try to shock us with the procedure. Let me shock you with one that happened to my best friend. 15 years old, top of the class, bright nad beautiful and dead. She was being raped repeatedly by her father but couldn't tell anyone because he was a well repsected man and no one would have believed her. She tried to tell her mother, her mother struck her and called her every foul name in the book. My beautiful and bright friend killed herself rather than admit her shameful state. Pregnant by her own father. How's that for shocking. She may have been the one with the cure for cancer, or a Mozart or a world leader. Because of a grown mans selfish need to rape his own child, her life ended rather than admit what had been happening to her. Is that a better scenario to you?

  • Posted By: DoubleEzy @ 10/17/2008 10:50:24 AM

    nimodahooligan, you are right on! We need to make a distinction between Pro-Life and Pro-Birth. If the repubs want to take away safe, legal access to contraception and abortion, they better dawn well be willing to pay more taxes (or defer defense spending) so that those children are taken care of. The right's refusal to do so indicates that misogyny is the underlying driver, NOT the welfare of children

    • Posted By: nort @ 10/18/2008 5:31:27 PM

      And the loads of spelling mistakes are very telling... no offence...(and English is my third language ,not even first)

    • Posted By: paproudmom @ 10/17/2008 11:13:27 AM

      I'd much rather pay taxes to support life than all those wasteful pork barrel spending projects Obama requested daily.

      • Posted By: Luridmoon @ 10/17/2008 6:19:34 PM

        Hey, have you read any of Sarah Palin's proposals lately? Give me a break! It amazes me how some people are so blind. "don't point the finger when you have three pointed right back at you"

      • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 2:04:44 PM

        WHat about all the one John McCain voted for are you ok with those ones?

  • Posted By: wisemanjo @ 10/17/2008 11:38:49 PM

    Posted By: wisemanjo @ 10/17/2008 11:22:46 PM
    Comment: To BAXCY: Giving a "rat's ass" is hardly fair to the rat. Why is it always the rat who has to sacrifice his ass when it comes to important issues? The rat is an innocent little creature, created by God and has rights too, ya know.Did anyone ask the rat if he would mind if we killed him for a little thing we call an opinion? What's that?? I can't hear you? OH IT"S BECAUSE THE RAT DOESN"T HAVE A VOICE. I think you should apologize to the rat and the rats before him who laid their asses down for the preposterus notion that an unborn chlld has rights. I mean if he has to take it up the ass I guess the unborn child with no voice is gonna have to take the hit as well. All's fair in the animal kingdom; only the strong survive




    Posted By: baxcy @ 10/17/2008 9:44:57 PM
    Comment: I find it very curious that people who are such staunch pro-lifers who have such strong opinons about abortion at even the earliest of stages, never give a rats ass about animal rights. Most prolifers will expend tremendous amounts of energy in hatred and action towards anything antiabortion to save even the smallest mass of human cells but wouldn't lift a finger to stand up for animals who suffer daily in unimaginable ways.

    • Posted By: artemis8 @ 10/18/2008 12:58:56 AM

      wow...that was really a dumb comment, wisemanjo.

      • Posted By: hojo81 @ 10/18/2008 10:15:22 AM

        If pro-lifers didn't need to worry about protecting babies we could move on to helping animals. But we must prioritize.

        • Posted By: ProMomOf6 @ 10/18/2008 5:25:37 PM

          Oh, so you protect them. And let me ask this...do you pay for them? Medical fees, clothing,food, yanno the day to day things that everyone needs. Now how about therapy because a young mother was forced to give birth to a child she couldn't care for, or couldn't bear the sight of because the child was concieved in violence?

  • Posted By: Twister52 @ 10/17/2008 11:35:46 PM

    ANY woman, repeat, ANY woman ANYWHERE and ANYTIME, that chooses to have an abortion where the REAL reason is primarily "convenience" instead of when her health is in dire risk will one day stand before God and be judged for her selfishness. Men who participated in the process of creation only to selfishly walk away will also be held accountable. It won't be a pretty sight for women or men who put themselves in this situation. Consider yourself warned. Don't believe me? Go ask God yourself but be prepared to listen to what He has to say on the matter or, with your desire to ignore what He says, the Heavens and the knowledge they possess will be closed to you.

    It saddens me tremendously that people choose to be so incredibly shortsighted and offended over anything good and decent like John McCain's "evil" airquotes and his accompanying remark. On the other hand, my heart is encouraged when I read some of the posts below that prove that not everyone in America is stupid and without faith in God and their need to exercise personal responsibility.

    May God bless America and all those who truly love her.

    • Posted By: benkrapf @ 10/18/2008 3:31:43 AM

      What if she doesn't believe in your god?

      • Posted By: hojo81 @ 10/18/2008 10:17:03 AM

        That won't make Him go away.

        • Posted By: ghostmasseur @ 10/18/2008 10:41:52 AM

          Believing in your god does not make him real for anyone but you either.

          • Posted By: ProMomOf6 @ 10/18/2008 5:22:08 PM

            Well said ghost, well said.

  • Posted By: familia @ 10/18/2008 2:02:38 AM

    Folks, how far are you willing to take this "right to choose" justification? Let's go back to the 1860's. Maybe the abolitionists shouldn't have fought to outlaw slavery because it was denying their "right to choose" to own slaves? Would you agree with that today? Hopefully not, and yet back then they definitely felt it was a property rights issue. Would those opposed to slavery back then have said (like many of you) that they "personally are opposed" to slavery but "who am I" to tell them what to do? And yet, thankfully , Abe Lincoln and others saw the EVIL of slavery and opposed it. And most of us today are thankful that they imposed their will against that evil. So should it be with abortion. Sure some will disagree. But evil is evil. It must be stopped. ALL laws involve the imposing of morality. These are babies being killed. 50 million since 1973. Does that not bother anyone anymore?

    Or to look at it another way....why stop with killing babies in the womb....why not allow it in the 1st few years of life? After all, many moms get depressed after the birth of a child (the "health" exception). Many have to halt their careers to care for their children. Why not allow the killing of these children as well if it's causing inconvenience to the mother??? I'm being a bit facetious, but it's a legtitimate question....how far will this line of thinking go? The baby is being forgotten about in all of this. That's the goal of the pro-abortion radicals....just focus on the "woman's right'" aspect and ignore the baby (call it "fetus" to impersonalize it). But we all know better if we're honest. It's a life. That's why the other side avoids talking about it. That's why pro-abortion politicians like Obama and Clinton want to keep abortion rare....yet they want to keep it to appease their radical pro-abortion supporters who fill their campaigns with Millions of $$ because they make so much profit off of abortion. It's blood money and one day they'll give account.
    God is calling this nation back to Himself. I pray it happens soon.

    • Posted By: ProMomOf6 @ 10/18/2008 4:55:30 PM

      Then pray to your "god" because it's your belief, not mine. Andd to think I am the one that loves everyone and thinks that we all have the right to believe how we wish. Isn't there something about that in the bible? Yanno, the dusty book that ONE MAN decided which texts should be included and now we are finding about so many other "lost books" It was written by men. Period. Only in this book is there so many inconstistancies. Atone point it says "An eye for an eye" and yet "turn the other cheek" is in the same book. Go figgure. I don't choose to cram my beliefs down anyones throat and I don't appreciate anyone else doing it to me.
      Now as to the ludicris statement about killing children up in the first years. Only someone totally oblivious to the tide rising over their shoes would go that far. Know the argument is lost do we? Go read your book a little more and educate yourself about what's in it's pages. You need it.

  • Posted By: IAmommy @ 10/17/2008 3:22:44 PM

    Ok, i have to say something because this is just too much between these two.
    HolyRoller, just stop, please. You are making yourself sound crazy & fanatic & giving a bad name to those of us christians who are not this zealous in spreading our opinions. I am sure that is not the type of person you really are.
    Trishalish, same goes. You are coming across as an ice-cold b@$%! for lack of a better term. I'm sure you are not a cold & unfeeling person, but you are not helping your cause coming across as vehemently as you are.
    The way you two are going back & forth with each other & other people make you sound like a couple of high school girls that have nothing better to do than be instigators. It's not becoming of either one of you, as I'm sure that you are educated people to have the strong views that you do.

    • Posted By: dsqard @ 10/17/2008 3:27:36 PM

      Iamommy Holyroller is pretty much known on these blogs as an intolerant bigot and pretty much ignored.

      • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 4:37:43 PM

        You wish....HolyRoller has so many followers...I could start a fan club....BTW...Gallup has the election @ 2 pts among likely voters....Hussein is slip-sliding away........

        Allah Akbar Ya'll

        NOBAMA!!!

        • Posted By: Luridmoon @ 10/18/2008 4:20:11 PM

          Yes, amy followers who will follow you to the pits of self loathing and mental atrophy

        • Posted By: nimodahooligan @ 10/17/2008 4:42:57 PM

          you are the most vile disgusting stereotypical fat ignorant american ive ever had the displeasure of bumping into on the internet much less in person... go eat mr. bush's ass for awhile you rascist pig. i hear the KKK is accepting applicants you twit...y'all...

          how many teeth do you still have???

  • Posted By: wisemanjo @ 10/18/2008 12:25:16 AM

    No one knows the potential of the person being housed in the womb. If Beethoven's parents had available the technology to tell them he would be born both blind and deaf, do you think they would have had an abortion? Probably. And at the advice of their doctor and so many others who would just want to spare poor Ludwig the pain of living a horrible life; it would be better to just put him out of his misery now. And the world would never hear some of the greatest music known to man.

    If Martin Luther King's mother had the choice to give birth to another hungry mouth, living in poverty, struggling to be accepted just because of his skin color, do you think she would have an abortion? Possibly. Why bother bringing another life into this world when you know he will be gunned down by an assasin's bullet anyway? Then there would never have been the civil rights movement.

    Out of the 40 million abortions since Roe v Wade, how much greatness have we stolen from society? Perhaps one of them had the cure for cancer. Perhaps one of them could solve world hunger. Perhaps one of them could bring peace to the Middle East. Or Perhaps one of them could have written that one song you just had to have played on your wedding day. One thing is certain: we will never know.

    • Posted By: Hawayana @ 10/18/2008 4:20:00 PM

      wise comment. thank you!

  • Posted By: Proudpagan @ 10/17/2008 3:13:33 PM

    It's really simple. If you don't have a uterus; it's none of your business. If you do have a uterus; your uterus is your business, but nobody else's is.

    • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 3:19:56 PM

      You can have your uterous, just don't make unwanted babies. If you purposely get pregnant without using any prevention, then the baby becomes the responsiblity of a caring, sane society. Otherwise, have your uterous sewn up or have an operation to prevent you from getting pregnant. Take responsibility for your mistakes. Don't blame other people for your ignorant, self-serving, self-centered actions.

      • Posted By: dsqard @ 10/17/2008 3:43:33 PM

        You can have your penis, just don't make unwanted babies. If you purposely cause a pregnancy without using any prevention, then the baby becomes the responsiblity of a caring, sane society. Otherwise, have your penis sewn up or have an operation to prevent you from causing a pregnancy. Take responsibility for your mistakes. Don't blame other people for your ignorant, self-serving, self-centered actions.
        See it works both ways!!!

        • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 3:46:52 PM

          I do use preventions so I don't cause an unwanted baby so some uncaring idiot can get an abortion. Only trash would put themselves in that situation. The only exceptions are rape and incest.

          • Posted By: dsqard @ 10/17/2008 3:53:37 PM

            So you have had a vasectomy? That is the only 100% way that a man can be sure that he will not cause an unwanted pregnancy.

            • Posted By: mom2four @ 10/17/2008 4:21:43 PM

              Uuummm... do I need to mention that a vascectomy is only 98% effective? The only way to be 100% protected from pregnancy is to not have sex. It's unfortunate that we don't have more reliability in birth control, for those who want to use it, but just maybe not so unfortunatel that a child should lose it's life because of the accident. I'll adopt your unwanted baby. I've adopted three already. Do you think that would change someone's mind or are there people choosing abortion because pregnancy and birth would be inconvenient? We know the answer to that of course, it's a rhetorical question...

              • Posted By: Luridmoon @ 10/18/2008 4:14:44 PM

                Please post your phone number and email address so any prenant girl who doesnt want her deformed fetus can contact you.

            • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 3:58:22 PM

              I think with my brain, not the head of my penis.

              • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 4:19:35 PM

                I didn't think impetant men could get anyone pregnant, so you shouldn't even talk.

                • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 7:00:46 PM

                  I wouldn't screw you with Obama's penis!!

                  • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 8:00:59 PM

                    You mean you couldn't.. that's why your impotent, I wouldn't even consider you a man :)

              • Posted By: dsqard @ 10/17/2008 4:03:40 PM

                So that is a no

    • Posted By: dsqard @ 10/17/2008 3:17:41 PM

      AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 3:27:06 PM

        Another Socialist point of view as well as a murderers'!

        • Posted By: nimodahooligan @ 10/17/2008 4:30:21 PM

          hey......i have a secret....democracy and capitolism arent working so great either....shhhhh....dont tell anyone... the economy might collapse all around you....

      • Posted By: dsqard @ 10/17/2008 3:25:05 PM

        That's AMEN to proudpagan not jimmy jones

  • Posted By: MrsDi @ 10/17/2008 11:18:39 AM

    hr - so you are willing to kill and injure women.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 11:24:50 AM

      No I am not...your comment is SOOOO typical of the lack of values left....I am stating that abortion should be a RARE instance...not a form of birth-control....Unrestricted, encouraged, and illegal abortions for the underage...IS INFANTICIDE....but you call it CHOICE...SICK

      Sanger and Planned Parenthood's STATED ORIGINAL PURPOSE...was to rid America of African-American babies...a practice they continue today...all the while denying the fact....they will earmark donations specifically for killing ethnic groups...it is a proven and tape recorded FACT.

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: TheVigil @ 10/17/2008 11:28:32 AM

        How particularly did you want to accomplish this through policy? I'm not even being sarcastic here, Roller - if you would allow the rare abortion, what are the criteria? If that's *really* what you want, then regardless of whether or not we agree on the punishment levels or anything else, we have something in common. In fact, I'd say you have more in common with us than you think. None of us WANTS to see an abortion happen, ever.

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 11:47:03 AM

          Virgil...you are WRONG...unrestricted killing of babies is inhuman and WRONG...to defend that position is akin to defense of the Holocaust...when would I give a woman the "right"??..when her life is truly at risk, which is seldom....cases of PROVEN violent rape (many like that accusation when it was NOT the case) or incest. Abortions would drop +90%. It is mainly used as birth-control...and...you know this is true.

          The "mental" health issue is SICK...killing a baby is not a form of therapy.

          NOBAMA!!!

          • Posted By: TheVigil @ 10/18/2008 4:08:22 PM

            In most of the cases I've heard about, it's always a difficult decision for the mother to get an abortion or not, involving a lot of emotional stress. I think your notion that the majority of abortions are casual decisions whereby a woman aborts her fetus as casually as going to the store to buy condoms is based on your own emotion rather than on fact.

            In any case an abortion is an invasive and expensive procedure costing at least a few hundred dollars.

            There are indeed some women who don't feel anything about their aborted babies. I believe it's rare. There are women who bear the child live and then stuff it in a trash can too.

  • Posted By: GeorginaKlanica @ 10/17/2008 10:49:46 AM

    What about pregnancies caused by rape and incest? Mother's health isn't the only issue.

    • Posted By: bojack27 @ 10/17/2008 11:25:06 AM

      There are 1.3 million abortions performed in the country annually and of that 1.3 million less than 1% are performed for rape, incest and any other complications. So that is 13,000 abortions performed for the above combined reasons. Now the other reasons for abortion have nothing to do with a woman's health issue and are mostly used as a means of contraception, revenge, carelessness,.....etc... NOT a Woman's Health

      • Posted By: Luridmoon @ 10/17/2008 6:12:10 PM

        most abortions are NOT due to carelesness, but in fact, due to the viability of the fetus, or lack thereof, actually. Most aborted fetuses are deformed and/or retarded. Lots of families cannot afford to care for them, and/or have the belief that termination would be a better fate than forcing a child to live in such a condition to satisfy their own selfish feelings or thoughts. These children will never grow to have a fufilled life, such as dating or anything else, for that matter. And what about the quality of life of the parents? How would you liek to have to change a 50 year old's diaper when your 80, and doing it everyday until you drop dead? And who will care for them then??

        • Posted By: lutheranwoman @ 10/18/2008 12:20:30 AM

          How does letting a physically or mentally disabled baby live make the parents selfish? If anything, it shows complete selfLESSness because they are willing to put their childs life before their own convenience.

          • Posted By: Luridmoon @ 10/18/2008 3:50:55 PM

            No, they aew being selfish becasue their desire to have a baby outweighs the suffering and utterly limited life that they are bringing forth. That is selfishness to the highest degree!

            • Posted By: Luridmoon @ 10/18/2008 3:52:27 PM

              please excuse the typos

  • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 2:32:44 PM

    It has never, and never will be, anyone's right to kill another human. You are sick in the mind just like Obama. He voted against saving a baby's life that was born alive from a botched abortion. He also voted not to ban partial birth abortion where the doctor holds the baby by the feet, reaches into the womb, punctures the baby's skull, and sucks out the brain. Aren't you glad that you were allowed to live? Obama wants to practice Hitler's ideas. Please don't vote for him. He has Socialist ideas. Even the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said today that he was happy to see the end of capitalism in America. Wake up America and see through Obama's smoke screen.

    • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 2:40:25 PM

      Wow not one word you said was even close to any sort of truth. Way to spread the disease man.

      • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 2:48:37 PM

        Do your research dumbo. Only call a person a liar when you can present the evidence supporting your accusations.

        • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 4:37:10 PM

          Look buddy most people watched the debates and can do research on their own. Peopl ehave stated the facts here multiple time and you obviously choose to ignor them because you need to feel sanctified in your radical religious beliefs. I'm sorry you are so insecure about your religion but making things up and spewing hatered won't make you fairytales true.

          • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 7:11:14 PM

            The truth always hurts, doesn't it??

            • Posted By: Luridmoon @ 10/18/2008 3:48:04 PM

              The TRUTH is your religion is based of the gnostic SECT that worshipped a solar deity based on astrology. Your Jesus represents the age of Pisces, timed from 0 AD til 2150, then we enter the age of Aquarius. Why do you think the fish symbol is so closely related to the Jesus personage? And please, do not ramble on about the story of Jesus feeding people with two fish (symbol of pisces) and bread (the house of bread is also a grouping of stars in astrology). Any ones who researches the truth will know that story is purely astrological.

            • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 9:32:35 PM

              What are you talking? You wouldn't know truth if it flew up your butt. YOu just believe fanatical stories because you knowwithout them you wouldn't have any substance in your life. You'd might actually have to like people

    • Posted By: ArJay5000 @ 10/18/2008 6:27:26 AM

      Jimbo: It has never, and never will be, anyone's right to kill another human.

      Enter Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld. They have murdered more children in this unjust war that will be proplonged with a McCain victory.

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 10/17/2008 2:42:31 PM

      Wow...just...wow. If anything, you're more like Hitler than Obama. The same intolerant views and spewing of hate filled lies.

      • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 2:48:01 PM

        Do your research dumbo. Only call a person a liar when you can present the evidence supporting your accusations.

        • Posted By: dsqard @ 10/17/2008 2:54:16 PM

          Illinois law has long stated that if an abortion is performed when the fetus is deemed to be viable, the doctor must:

          Choose the method of abortion least likely to harm the fetus.


          Have in attendance a second doctor who can immediately take over care of the child if it's born alive.


          Use every available means to keep any born-alive child living and healthy.
          To do otherwise constitutes a Class 3 felony, which carries a sentence of two to five years in prison. That's been the law in Illinois since 1975, two years before Jessen was born. What Obama voted against was legislation that would have extended the law's protection to any aborted fetus that shows any sign of life, even if doctors are certain that it cannot survive.

          A review of the literature shows that fetuses are generally considered viable ??? that is, capable of surviving outside the womb ??? after 26 weeks, and sometimes even earlier. Fetuses older than 28 weeks have a good average survival rate, and one 2006 study puts the odds at 90 percent or higher. Illinois law does not specify exactly when viability occurs, but at 29-and-a-half weeks, Jessen would not have been a close call.

          Groups like BornAliveTruth.org say laws like the one that applied in Illinois leave discretion to the physician. As the anti-abortion group puts it, they cover fetuses who "are considered viable ??? by the very doctor aborting them." That's a fact, and reasonable people might agree or disagree on the merits of relying on a physician's discretion. But for Jessen to claim that she "wouldn't be here" without the legislation Obama opposed is false. Jessen's life would have been protected under Illinois law with or without any of the "born alive" bills Obama opposed in 2001, 2002 and 2003.

          For the record, Obama says he would have supported "born alive" legislation in Illinois if framed in a way that did not pose a threat to abortion rights granted by the Supreme Court in its Roe v. Wade decision.

          • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 2:59:35 PM

            In other words Obama voted against saving a baby's life!! That's what I said, stupid!!

            • Posted By: dsqard @ 10/17/2008 3:16:20 PM

              He voted against a bill that infringed on Roe V. Wade. Can you READ???? As you can see there has been a law in IL since 1975 that protects a baby that is born alive during an abortion. That law was not rescinded and is still in place to this day STUPID.

              • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 3:33:44 PM

                He voted to kill babies rather than change Roe vs Wade, idiot. You never commit murder in America under any circumstance.

                • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/17/2008 5:25:17 PM

                  No he didn't. A fetus isn't a baby.

                  • Posted By: nwsjnkie @ 10/18/2008 3:08:27 AM

                    A fetus is a child. A child that's on a train is still a child. A child that's in the womb is still a child. A child that breathes through a ventilator is still a child. Ac child that takes nourishment through the mother is still a child. A mentally handicapped child is still a child. A mentally maturing child is still a child. What creates a child? It has a mother and a father. Does a fetus have a mother and a father? Yes.

                  • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 7:09:38 PM

                    These were live babies, idiot.

            • Posted By: summer4077 @ 10/17/2008 3:15:12 PM

              Wow. You really are quite the simpleton. There was already a law in place to care for babies born alive during abortion. Obama didn't vote against that law; it was in existence long before his tenure as a state senator. THERE WAS ALREADY A LAW IN PLACE. What don't you get?

              • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 3:35:19 PM

                You are right and he voted against it. What is wrong with you idiots. Pull your head out of Obama's a$$ and smeel the roses. They smell much better.

                • Posted By: summer4077 @ 10/17/2008 3:47:21 PM

                  He didn't vote against the law in place, IT WAS ALREADY IN PLACE. He voted against a NEW law. A NEW one!

                  • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 3:52:23 PM

                    Yes, to allow living babies to die!

                    • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 4:25:11 PM

                      They aren't living if they haven't been born, Try to act like the christian you say you are, by not being prejudice of othe rreligions and races. At least I don't like any religions, am not partial to anyone.

                      • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 7:10:25 PM

                        These were born, dumbass!

                        • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 9:30:55 PM

                          It's called the hypocratic oath buy a science book.

          • Posted By: blake55 @ 10/17/2008 10:33:34 PM

            The method of abortion least likely to harm the fetus. Am I reading this right?

        • Posted By: summer4077 @ 10/17/2008 3:13:18 PM

          I have done my research. Suggesting that Obama wants to wipe out an entire religion is ridiculous.

          • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 3:32:18 PM

            I didn't say anything about wiping out a religion. He just wants to convert everyone to Islam.

            • Posted By: summer4077 @ 10/17/2008 3:46:25 PM

              Wow. I'm not going to try to reason with you because you obviously have no grasp on reality. Go back to your Bush shrine and say some prayers.

              • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 3:51:24 PM

                Bush has been in office 8 years and I am still a Christian, and even Obama can't change that.

                • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 4:23:27 PM

                  No body wants to, it's your right to be as ignorant as you want :)

                  • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 7:09:00 PM

                    So you are either an Atheist or a Muslim. That's okay with me.

                    • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 8:05:37 PM

                      Agnostic I'm open to admit there is something but that I don't think anyone knows or is right about what it is and even if I did belive in something particular I don't like organized religion, it's a cult and they brainwash you. Baaa baaa for the masses, I live a good life and I don't need reigion to feel sanctimonious about it.

            • Posted By: nimodahooligan @ 10/17/2008 5:01:26 PM

              EXCUSE ME....JIM SMALL JOHNSON...maybe you missed the big fiasco about Obamas PREACHER, AT HIS CHURCH....LET ME SPELL THAT OUT...

              C-as in cat
              H-as in holy
              U-as in uterus
              C-as in castrate
              H-as in you are Hitler

              Obama has never set foot in a mosque...stop being a idiot, your making my head hurt

              • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/17/2008 7:07:32 PM

                Obama admitted his Islamic faith!!

              • Posted By: nimodahooligan @ 10/17/2008 5:04:27 PM

                damn, i was in a rush and forgot the...

                R- as in your Racsist...

            • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 4:22:55 PM

              WHat's wrong with Islam? The Islamic haven't done anything the Christians haven't?

  • Posted By: insideofme@hotmail.com @ 10/17/2008 7:32:04 PM

    obama is a baby killer. If he wants women kill their babies, why he did not kill his own? What is the difference?
    Lots a women hate him for that reason . I will preffer to kill a grown up person, that i little baby that can not deffend themselves. He is a cower. God should punish him.he is muslin, he does no care to kill.
    he does not care to kill or not to kill.

    • Posted By: freedomgirl @ 10/17/2008 7:49:23 PM

      God should punish Obama for being a fabric? Maybe He should punish you for being ignorant. This is not about God. It is about America and freedom and choice. Don't forget about the seperation of church and state (they taught it in the second grade, if you made it that far.)

      • Posted By: jochebed1 @ 10/17/2008 10:38:39 PM

        God IS invovled in everything and He will judge every thought, word, and action that we say.

        • Posted By: ghostmasseur @ 10/18/2008 3:15:09 PM

          That is your OPINION and belef, not a universal fact.

          You may have created your god in your mind but that entity has no power or authority over me because he does not exist outside of your mind. He does not exist for me therefore he has no say, rights or authority over me. He is a non-entity and of no worth to me. It is fine that you give him authority over you but you canot give him authority over others unless they choose to let him have such.

    • Posted By: angstandvexed @ 10/17/2008 9:15:42 PM

      Obama is a Christian, get your information straight. Second, Obama never said that he wants women to kill their babies. All he wants is for women to have that choice, if they ever need it. Third if you are so against abortion, why don't you help form a fund , or a group, to support women who want to make a different choice.

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/18/2008 12:31:24 PM

    Karl Rove and the GOP are shamelessly exploiting the Christian faith. For me, this is a main reason not to vote Republican this year, just as big as the war and the economy.

    I am a Catholic and I strongly believe in the separation of Church and State. I am very concerned about McCain's stated intention of appointing more religious right judges to the Supreme Court with the goal of overturning Roe v, Wade. McCain discusses this goal on his website, and even mentioned it in the last debate.

    Even though I personally don't think abortion is acceptable, I do think that reproductive rights are civil rights. Ask the women in China whose second children have been taken away how much they would like to control their reproductive rights. Or the Mormon teenagers who were forced into "marriages" below the age of consent. Without reproductive rights, life can become very dismal indeed.

    Right now, five of the nine Supreme Court Justices are Catholic. We have a CATHOLIC MAJORITY in the Supreme Court. Four of these Justices (Scalia, Alito, Thomas and Roberts) have consistently voted a conservative anti-abortion ticket. The fifth Catholic Justice (Kennedy) is a moderate, who sometimes votes in favor of abortion rights, sometimes against. Justice Stevens, a liberal on abortion, is 88 years old. Justice Ginsburg, another liberal on abortion, is 75. Kennedy, the centrist Catholic, is 72. Chances are good, given their ages, that at least one of them will die or retire during the term of the next President. And if our next President is McCain, presto-chango, we suddenly have a Supreme Court that is controlled by conservative Catholics.

    Even though I am a Catholic who is against abortion, I can see the dangers of the highest court in the land interpreting the law through narrow eyes. This can't be good for America. Why not let the Protestants, the Jews or the Baptists control the Supreme Court? That sounds pretty ridiculous, doesn't it? Or how about the Buddhists (they might actually be more impartial). Perhaps we should hand over the Supreme Court to a Muslim majority? That would make us all scream, wouldn't it? Having a conservative Catholic majority is just as bad, if you stop to think about it.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/18/2008 1:49:32 PM

      Q. What do you call a Conservite Christian Republican, who supports Hussein Obama???

      A. A LYING NINNY!!!!!

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: Nins @ 10/18/2008 2:52:36 PM

        It's interesting that instead of discussing the issues I raised and defending the ideas and the honor of your candidate, you resort to name calling to try and devalue what I have written. Maybe you can't find enough good to say about McCain/Palin, but you really should try, because the independent and undecided voters are going to look at your comments and think "How lame."

  • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/18/2008 1:33:35 PM

    Obama's view of the future of America - Socialism which is the next step to Communism!! He admitted to Joe the Plumber than he wanted to spread the wealth! He said that he wanted to make everyone equal! Is America ready for Socialism? The Iranian president, Ahmadinejad, said today that he is glad to see the end to capitalism in America!! Are you glad?????
    ====================================================================================================


    Under socialism a ruling class of intellectuals, bureaucrats and social planners decide what people want or what is good for society and then use the coercive power of the State to regulate, tax, and redistribute the wealth of those who work for a living. In other words, socialism is a form of legalized theft.

    The morality of socialism can be summed-up in two words: envy and self-sacrifice. Envy is the desire to not only possess another's wealth but also the desire to see another's wealth lowered to the level of one's own. Socialism's teaching on self-sacrifice was nicely summarized by two of its greatest defenders, Hermann Goering and Bennito Mussolini. The highest principle of Nazism (National Socialism), said Goering, is: "Common good comes before private good." Fascism, said
    Mussolini, is "a life in which the individual, through the sacrifice of his own private interests??realizes that completely spiritual existence in which his value as a man lies."

    Socialism is the social system which institutionalizes envy and self-sacrifice: It is the social system which uses compulsion and the organized violence of the State to expropriate wealth from the producer class for its redistribution to the parasitical class.

    Despite the intellectuals' psychotic hatred of capitalism, it is the only moral and just social system.

    Capitalism is the only moral system because it requires human beings to deal with one another as traders--that is, as free moral agents trading and selling goods and services on the basis of mutual consent.

    Capitalism is the only just system because the sole criterion that determines the value of thing exchanged is the free, voluntary, universal judgement of the consumer. Coercion and fraud are anathema to the free-market system.

    It is both moral and just because the degree to which man rises or falls in society is determined by the degree to which he uses his mind. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one's birth or station in life.

    Yes, there are winners and losers in capitalism. The winners are those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal, responsible, disciplined, and efficient. The losers are those who are shiftless, lazy, imprudent, extravagant, negligent, impractical, and inefficient. [What about the role of luck­ being in the right place at the right time or the wrong place at the wrong time? R. R. Pope}

    • Posted By: Nins @ 10/18/2008 2:51:07 PM

      Jim Johnson, no matter how many times people tell you that Obama is against socialism, you keep posting these blogs that accuse Obama of socialism and communism. It is not true and you know it. You are just trying to smear Obama and make people afraid.

      In his book Audacity of Hope, Obama writes at length about the FAILURE of SOCIALISM and the failure of communism. He enthusiastically states that American democracy is the greatest political system on earth. Obama is not a socialist, and he does not admire socialism.

      You need to recognize that all democracies socialize certain functions: police, fire fighting, military, roads, public schools, sewers, water. This is for the greater good and we all accept it. It does not make us socialists.

      To you, Jim, and to all of the conservatives out there who think that Obama is a flaming liberal, I would like to remind you of what he did when he was elected President of the Harvard Law Review. The Law Review President gets to name ten individuals to write articles for the Review, and these ten people also get to control the content of the publication. All of the minorities and the liberals thought they finally had it made, that Obama would appoint ten left wing editors. Instead, Obama appointed three conservatives, three liberals and four moderates. That year the Law Review was critically acclaimed as the best run and best written Harvard publication in decades.

      So when he wins in November, conservatives don't have to freak out. Obama is a centrist and will appoint a balanced cabinet full of active people who will really get things done. Kind of like the way our multi-cultural society is supposed to be. And exactly what we need in this time of economic crisis.

  • Posted By: Jim Johnson @ 10/18/2008 1:33:11 PM

    Everyone of voting age should read these two books written by Obama, 'Dreams of My Father' and 'Audacity of Hope'. Don't buy them, get them from the library before they are removed from the shelves.

    From 'Dreams of My Father', "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."

    From 'Dreams of My Father', "'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race."

    From 'Dreams of My Father', "There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white."

    From 'Dreams of My Father', "It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names."

    From 'Dreams of My Father', "I never emulate WHITE men and BROWN men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself , the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela."

    And FINALLY the Most Damning one of ALL of them!!!

    From 'Audacity of Hope', "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

    • Posted By: Nins @ 10/18/2008 2:50:39 PM

      Jim, as usual you are trying to twist a fact to make it mean something different.

      Your quotes from Obama's books are more or less accurate, but they are taken completely out of context. In Dreams from my Father, Obama writes at length about how he went through an adolescent period of rebellion and identity crisis. He spent some time identifying with his black heritage and feeling how victimized blacks have been. If you read the whole book, you will see how he realized that it was immature for him to stay stuck in these feelings. He realized that he needed to do something constructive, rather than complain about other people being destructive. And he needed to see both sides of the story, both black and white, since he is both black and white. Actually, Jim, you could take a lesson from that and learn how to be more objective.

      You quote from Audacity of Hope is taken from a speech Obama gave after 9/11. He said that if the US government starts rounding up Muslims without cause and without giving them due process of law, that he would stand up for the Muslims rather than just watch our government put them in prison camps like we did to the Japanese Americans in WWII. In fact, the Bush administration created it's own internment camp and called it Guantanamo Bay. While there are certainly many guilty terrorists held in Guantanamo, there are also many innocent American citizens who have been held illegally for years without even being charged with any crime. They have been tortured by our government. Some of them have died.

      Recently the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration in the matter of Guantanamo Bay. The Supreme Court Justices were NOT on the side of the terrorists. They were on the side of the Geneva Convention, that says you can not torture POWs, and on the side of US laws that state you can not imprison a person without charging them with a crime and bringing them to trial. I'm sure that like most Americans, the Justices who voted against the illegal, immoral doings at Guantanamo did not feel sympathy for the terrorists. They felt sympathy for the laws of AMERICA, the land of the FREE, where even rat finks get a fair trial.

      One of the things that makes America GREAT is Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press. Your blog implies that if McCain wins the Presidency, Obama's books will be banned from public libraries. Heaven helps us! If this is true, it would be one heck of a reason to vote against McCain. Come to think of it, Sarah Palin tried to ban books from the Wasilla Public Library, and fired the Head Librarian when she refused to comply. Maybe it is true.

      God save us from small minded people like you, Jim Johnson.

  • Posted By: GregHere @ 10/18/2008 6:18:02 AM

    ............................................McCain at 72 is in the last stages of his shot at being President and he is loosing in the polls so he has moved in Full Desperation Mode. to throw as much sleaze and wild charges at Obama in hopes of getting in the White House. "Maverick" McCain has alot of wild ideas that his Campaign has him giving us but mostly McCain is a substandard candidate that has some knowledge of Military Affairs that he has used to his advantage since his release from being a POW. "Maverick" McCain has rode the Military Guy Role for all these years to keep himself in office...................the only problem now is that America is not interested in Military War Making.....America now is interested in Economic Recovery and needs a good steady leader, not a Unpredictable Flake!!!!!!

    • Posted By: zillamutt @ 10/18/2008 2:36:26 PM

      it's too bad that both candidates are unpredictable flakes, so either way we lose.

  • Posted By: zillamutt @ 10/18/2008 1:50:23 PM

    For the most part, our government has the mentality to only make laws in the extreme. I agree that no matter which way they decide, there will be extremist on either side.
    I think that most people will agree with me that there are some reasons for abortions, but on the other hand I believe that they should not be easy and should never be used as birth control. If you think you have the right to choose- then you made a bad decision already-

  • Posted By: kteitel @ 10/18/2008 1:45:56 PM

    I think the tragedy here is that others would CHOOSE to inflict their beliefs on each other. The real victim is America. You cannot legislate morality. It just isn't possible. Presuming there is a God, it goes without saying he speaks differently to everyone, bible or not. Look how many faiths claim they are the "One true way". Devil's deception? Maybe its YOUR religion that is the deception. If there is one thing I've learned in life its that if God wishes to speak to me, he does so. He doesn't need you to ram morality down my throat. If he wants me to do something, he tells me, and when I do poorly, I know, and likewise I suffer the consequences of my behavior. As do you, even if you don't recognize it.
    It is for these solid, provable, and highly zealous reasons I am Pro-Choice. God alone knows my heart, and God alone can judge me.
    I likewise don't believe in handguns, and will never own one. But I will NOT take away your right to own one.
    As a side thought, I find it very amusing that so many pro-lifers support the death penalty. Anyone care to explain that to me?

  • Posted By: krask5 @ 10/18/2008 12:51:05 PM

    I'm a mother of 3 beautiful children and couldn't imagine my life without them. However, having my children was my choice. I strongly believe in a womans right to choose. Pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion. If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one, be glad you have a choice. We live in America, support our Freedoms! I don't believe in handguns, I don't own one, but I won't take away your right too if you choose.
    We live in America, support our Freedoms! I don't believe in owning handguns, but I
    I don't

  • Posted By: krask5 @ 10/18/2008 12:42:41 PM

    I'm a mother of 3 beautiful children and couldn't imagine my life without them. However, having my children was my choice. I strongly believe in a womans right to choose. Pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion. If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one, be glad you have a choice. We live in America, support our Freedoms! I don't believe in handguns, I don't own one, but I won't take away your right too if you choose.
    We live in America, support our Freedoms! I don't believe in owning handguns, but I
    I don't

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse