'Health' of the Mother

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: KeepinItReal @ 10/17/2008 7:44:43 PM

    If a person does not feel as though they can give a child a decent life, maybe they should consider making the choice of not having sex until they are in the position to deal with the possible outcome. Go without sex? Are you nuts? Reminds me of the SNL skit with Steve Martin "Don't Buy What You Can't Afford." We can't expect people to use common sense!

    And I think I will go to an abortion clinic and ask these questions: 1. Do you know that sex can result in pregnancy? 2. Do you use birth control? 3. Do you value life? 4. When are you planning to have sex again?

    According to Planned Parenthood more than 1 out of 3 American women have an abortion by the time they are 45 years old. Other resources state that approximately 1% are attributed to health reasons, rape, or incest. When did we obtain these cold, callous values?

    And, why don't we pro-lifers mind our own business? Because we are the only ones that unborn children have advocating for them!!!!!

    • Posted By: SomeChick1234 @ 10/18/2008 12:07:35 AM

      I love your posts!

  • Posted By: Kristenn @ 10/17/2008 12:15:54 PM

    I am suprised anyone is suprised that anti-abortionists don't care about the life of the mother. They never have, women die every day in the United States giving birth. The anti-abortionist never talk about that, or that all kinds of pregnancies, such as eptopic, kill both the mother and the unborn child. These people are not pro-life, they want to force other people do to what they want with no regard for the consequences. So do not be suprised when the health of another person doesn't matter to them, just vote to make sure they are never in postions of power to do more harm.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 12:24:24 PM

      At what point does a "fetus" become a child??? When does the "fetus" become a human being???

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: Luridmoon @ 10/18/2008 12:04:40 AM

        At what point will u ever stop writing??
        NOGOD!!!

      • Posted By: Kristenn @ 10/17/2008 12:33:36 PM

        You will not like this answere, but a fetus becomes a human being when it can live outside the mother's womb. Prior to that it is a fetus with the potential to become a human being. Which would be why fetus's from miscarrages have never been given formal burials, only babies that lived outside the womb have.

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 12:41:35 PM

          No I don't agree, but thanks for answering....Have you ever looked at an ultasound??? These are BABIES...I'm sure you don't like it...but...that is what they are, in my view...I have a question...

          If an pregnant woman, is the victim of a violent crime...and...the unborn dies as a result of it....should the perpetrator be charged with murder or manslaughter??? If so...WHY??

          NOBAMA!!!

          • Posted By: Kristenn @ 10/17/2008 12:54:29 PM

            I've looked at lots of ultra sounds, it is still the potential for life, not life. And the way a pregnecy is terminated voluntarly, involuntarly or violently doesn't change the fact that the potential for a person was ended not the death of a person. So the criminal should be convicted of the violent crime against the mother.

            • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 1:01:24 PM

              The heart is beating...the child feels pain...the child has brain waves...AND...with todays technology, could survive very early...OUTSIDE the womb.....


              You are in a deep ditch...just confess....you don't think killing a human being is a very big deal

              NOBAMA!!!

              • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/17/2008 5:55:08 PM

                It's not a child. No amount of foolishness on your part can make it so.

            • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 1:03:35 PM

              Charged with WHAT....assault??? Then they would be required to take some anger mgmt. classes...That is YOUR opinion???

              I take it...you think criminals a cool dudes....are you a gangsta????

              NOBAMA!!!

              • Posted By: momnotmrs @ 10/17/2008 2:06:09 PM

                All right, Pops. Nurse isn't supposed to let any of the inmates use the computers! Besides, you need to calm down before you see the nice doctor again.

            • Posted By: mom2four @ 10/17/2008 1:04:47 PM

              Kristn, it sounds like you've been tragically deluded.

        • Posted By: mom2four @ 10/17/2008 12:49:18 PM

          Oh, Kristen, I would love to tell you about my 16 month old "fetus" who died and was given a formal burial. Your comment is ignorant and offensive. My child was a wonderful part of my life for each of those weeks I was able to know her, see her in ultrasounds, get used to her sleeping positions and love of kicking, and feel her first movements the day before my body could no longer sustain the pregnancy. Don't tell me my child was somehow not real. Don't try to force me to believe that your opinion about the beginning of life is anything more than a thoughtless opinion you happen to hold.

          • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 10/17/2008 12:57:40 PM

            Did you mean 6 month as you typed 16 month?

            • Posted By: Kristenn @ 10/17/2008 1:07:14 PM

              I am going to guess you made a typo since humans do not gestate for 16 months and if you mean 6 months the child was able to breath outside your body and would explain the funeral. I would be suprised to discover you currently have a living child that you interact with on a daily basis. The relationship with a person who can respond to you is far different then the relationship you have with the hope, dream and expectation of a life growing inside you, both are important but they are different. And by the way my experiences are not your experiences do not presume thoughtlessness.

              • Posted By: mom2four @ 10/17/2008 5:05:23 PM

                In fact, I have four living children that I interact with on a daily basis. Of course a relationship is not the same with an unborn child as it is with a newborn, just as my relationship with my 18 month old is not the same as it is with my 14 year old. That wouldn't make me right in neglecting my youngest because our relationship was different though, so I don't at all understand you thought process of the comparison.

                • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/17/2008 5:54:14 PM

                  Do you even read the posts you respond to?

            • Posted By: mom2four @ 10/17/2008 5:14:57 PM

              Also, I would never assume that someone who chose an abortion were a bad person. I would hope they were simply uninformed about the decision they are making to kill a baby. I would hope the choice were not made for the sake of convenience, out of fear, or because the person didn't feel like accepting responsibility for the life inside of her. I would hope that she would be educated about all of her options and give the life of the child as much respect as she gives herself. In the case of rape and incest, which are dispicable realities, some women choose to maintain their pregnancies and continue to be blessed in knowing the child is theirs or happily adopted into a loving family. So, I also wouldn't want you to assume that women aren't strong enough or smart enough to make educated decisions, even in the face of adversity. btw, my own abortion was in the wake of a rape and i regret every moment of allowing others to persuade my decision to end my child's life. How do you expect a 12 year old child to handle that emotional burden for a lifetime if you assume she can't handle 9 months of pregnancy?

            • Posted By: mom2four @ 10/17/2008 1:06:36 PM

              correction, i did mean weeks - 4 months

          • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/17/2008 5:53:27 PM

            You were pregnant for 16 months? I don't get it.

          • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 10/17/2008 1:03:44 PM

            mom2four,

            I am truly sorry for your loss. I do not ever attempt to force my views on any other woman, and I ask the same. You wished to have a baby and if your child had survived it would have been a wonderful thing for you. Please understand that your experiences, hopes and dreams about having children are not necessarily mine.

            Under McCain/Palin worst scenario, a 12 year old child is raped by a family member or any man, in your opinion should this little girl be forced to endure 9 months of carrying this monsters child? There has to be a grey area. My body is my responsibility therefore it should remain my choice whether or not I give birth.

            Every girl or woman who decides to terminate a pregnancy is not someone of low moral fiber, they are not all tramps. Things happen. My body my choice that is one of the reasons that I could never ever vote for people such as McCain/Palin.

            • Posted By: mom2four @ 10/17/2008 4:37:56 PM

              I just don't see it as "your body" alone. I see it as your body with life inside. Here's the kicker - I've had an abortion. I know what it's like to be pushed through Planned Parenthood, scared to death, given no information about the procedure, not been allowed to see the ultrasound they were performing, given anti-anxiety medication to calm me down so they could explain why abortion was the right choice for me. In the end, it was my choice and I'm not grateful for having had the opportunity. Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you SHOULD.
              There are valid points on both sides of this issue. We shouldn't forget about the rights of a woman; we shouldn't ignore the rights of the unborn; we shouldn't enter into sexual relationships believing it wouldn't be fair to us if we got pregnant; and we shouldn't pretend this is a black and white issue.

              • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/17/2008 5:52:54 PM

                Don't like abortion, don't have one. Or, in your case, another one.

        • Posted By: EE7011 @ 10/17/2008 12:43:26 PM

          To add to your reply. The relationship is technically parasitic, because the fetus is living off the mother.

          • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 12:50:42 PM

            Parasitic???...You make them sound like an Obama Supporter...aka...obamamohammed

            NOBAMA!!!

            • Posted By: ThePrairiePrankster @ 10/17/2008 1:52:01 PM

              The only parasite I see is you, HolyRoller.

  • Posted By: lofaho @ 10/18/2008 12:01:32 AM

    Only if the woman is already pregnant.from previous intercourse. If she is not pregnant and has not ovulated, then it will delay ovulation

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 11:01:43 AM

    HUSSEIN TO ALLOW UNRESTICTED MURDER OF THE INNOCENTS........

    He promised at a Planned Parenthood event in July 2007 that ""he first thing" he will do as president -- his top priority for the nation -- is sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which would erase every federal and state restriction on abortion, no matter how modest. His TOP PRIORITY, again, is to re-legalize partial birth abortion under all circumstances, abolish all laws on informed consent and parental notification, and eliminate all state restrictions on taxpayer funding of abortions.

    Like it or not...the "Freedom of Choice Act" is exactly as stated above.....

    Huusein is willing to MURDER babies to gain loons vote. SICK...SICK...SICK...

    NOBAMA!!!

    • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 11:41:41 AM

      Really? Yay Obama for spreading freedom and de,ocracy and leaving the bible at home. Seperation of church and state is the best thing ever!!

      • Posted By: jochebed1 @ 10/18/2008 12:00:38 AM

        every comment you say, makes you look like a fool and especially this one.

    • Posted By: TJ21 @ 10/17/2008 11:22:57 AM

      loons? I think you should quit your job, go to a hospital everyday and tell expecting mothers that it is not up to their doctor but up to politicians whether or not they survive. Tell the Dr. that going to medical school was pointless and that their digression is meaningless.
      Explain to me why republicans want government to stay out of peoples lives when it comes to retirement and financial issues but they want to tell women what to do with their bodies? How is that logical?

      • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/17/2008 11:34:36 AM

        What percentage of babies a murdered daily...because the mothers physical well being was in danger??? VERY FEW...Ya'll just ENJOY killing the innocents. Makes you fell like "god". Very much like Serial Killers...which in essence you are.

        NOBAMA!!!

        • Posted By: TJ21 @ 10/17/2008 11:51:09 AM

          Exactly, I don't know how many, do you? Very few is still some. It has to be an option. Again, I understand there are people that abuse the system, but you and I can't make that decision. It has to be case by case. If a dr believes it is justifiable, how can you or I argue it. By banning it completely, you are saying that 100% of the time, the health of the mother justification is a lie. 100% of the time.

        • Posted By: Trishalish @ 10/17/2008 11:42:42 AM

          If have sex on birth control is killing babies then my hubby and I commited a holocaust this morning.

  • Posted By: zookeeper @ 10/17/2008 11:21:27 PM

    I am 38 years old and the mother of five. When I was 30, and three months pregnant with our third child, I found out I had leukemia. My first thought was for the health of my baby. I didn't even want to have a bone marrow biopsy if it were going to hurt the baby. Thankfully, it was a chronic form, not acute: treatment with chemo could wait until right after I delivered. But there were other concerns--bleeding to death during labor, for one. And then there was the fact that the kind of leukemia I had was typically found in men, aged 54 and older. My hematologist did some research and was unable to find any record of another woman having been pregnant with this type of leukemia. Despite the unknowns, I would never have considered an abortion. Three years later, after adopting child number 4, we were surprised to find out I was pregnant. We had been using birth control and thought we were done at four children. My husband had even made an appointment for a vasectomy. When I was five months pregnant, and continually sick, we found out the leukemia had returned. My new OBGYN (we had moved to another state) asked me if I wanted to have an abortion. I told her I wouldn't even consider it, and I was mortified thinking that other pregnant women with the same disease would choose to abort their children (understandably, out of fear and panic) because their doctors hadn't taken time to research the risks/odds and tell them that, in all likelihood, they and their babies would be fine. The week I was due to deliver by c-section, I had a placental abruption (something my hematologists later said had nothing to do with the leukemia). The baby and I almost died. A full hour went by between the time we called 911 and the time we arrived at the hospital. I lost so much blood! I was in and out of consciousness and truly believed I was dying--and I felt perfect peace... no regrets. From the time we arrived outside the hospital to the time the baby was removed from my womb, only 10 MINUTES went by--IT TAKES LONGER TO DO A PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION THAN IT DOES TO JUST DELIVER THE BABY!!!! Everything happened so quickly that I was afraid they were going to cut me open before I was completely under, but I was having a hard time communicating my concern because I was so weak and out of it. As the anesthesia took affect, my last thought was for my baby. I thought I was going to wake up to some very bad news. Praise God our son lived and is perfectly healthy (after he was born they told us he might have brain damage or cerebral palsy from having been oxygen deprived). My high risk pregnancy doctors were/are some of the best known in the country--the kind who do heart surgery on babies still in the womb. The doctor on call the night of the placental abruption later said; "Women from all over the country are referred to me. And in my entire career, your situation was one of the two most serious I've ever encountered." They referred to o

    • Posted By: Ebles @ 10/18/2008 12:00:09 AM

      Thank goodness for people like you and I'm happy you are around to tell your story! If only we had more like you.

  • Posted By: lutheranwoman @ 10/17/2008 11:59:10 PM

    Technically, the morning after pill is still abortion because it prevents a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus.

  • Posted By: wisemanjo @ 10/17/2008 11:22:46 PM

    To BAXCY: Giving a "rat's ass" is hardly fair to the rat. Why is it always the rat who has to sacrifice his ass when it comes to important issues? The rat is an innocent little creature, created by God and has rights too, ya know.Did anyone ask the rat if he would mind if we killed him for a little thing we call an opinion? What's that?? I can't hear you? OH IT"S BECAUSE THE RAT DOESN"T HAVE A VOICE. I think you should apologize to the rat and the rats before him who laid their asses down for the preposterus notion that an unborn chlld has rights. I mean if he has to take it up the ass I guess the unborn child with no voice is gonna have to take the hit as well. All's fair in the animal kingdom; only the strong survive
    "

    • Posted By: hfc2834 @ 10/17/2008 11:56:33 PM

      Now go thank your mother that she chose to bring you into the world.

  • Posted By: wisemanjo @ 10/17/2008 11:49:50 PM

    Interestingly, when a mother loses her fetus/baby at the hands of another; it is called manslaughter and murder (Scott Peterson). But when a mother has an abortion, it's called reproductive rights. Ronald Reagan once said, "Abortion only benefits people outside of the womb".

  • Posted By: lutheranwoman @ 10/17/2008 11:46:40 PM

    It would be interesting to know how many of the people on here who claim to be Christians have seen the inside of a church within the last year. That aside, I know tonight when I go to bed I will be praying for God's protection for all the unborn babies in the world, for the mother's who have had an abortion who seek forgiveness and to know the love & peace in Jesus, and for the Holy Spirit to work in the hearts of all the unbeliever's and pro-death people .

  • Posted By: goodlifeforus @ 10/17/2008 11:37:44 PM

    The point that has been missed is a woman's right to choose her own destiny is simply her own choice. Let God have his the reckoning for these women- I'm sure many of whom have considered him in their choice. An abortion isn't something that any woman wants. Life can be very complicated and few of us ever make all the right choices all the time. But it is not up to us to judge. If you really want to care about the life of another human- work at making your community better so that there are fewer abortions and fewer unwanted children. That is the way God wants us to use our individual power. Make good.

  • Posted By: lofaho @ 10/17/2008 11:36:27 PM

    I as a Christian personally don't believe in slavery, rape, or incest.... but I can't impose my beliefs on anyone else because God gives us the choice to do as we feel and he will judge us in the end. I think everyone should be able to have a choice...What we have to do is get rid of the need for unwanted violence against the individual and then we won't need to worry about slavery, rape or incest.For this reason, I don't think the government should interfere

  • Posted By: Lilith40 @ 10/17/2008 8:01:53 PM

    A woman's reproductive life is not something that should be under the control of the courts nor religious groups. It is that woman's business and her partner's regardless of her (or theirs) reasons.. Period.
    FYI How can abortion be murder if that perjorative term is not accurate. A fetus that cannot live on it's own, is not technically alive nor is a a fetus a "man" nor "woman" nor even a "baby" or "child" because it 's development. It's a potential and not an actual. It is a fetus. Period.


    Hyperemotionalisms and loaded terms don't make it an accurate statement.

    • Posted By: blake55 @ 10/17/2008 8:16:30 PM

      If that makes you feel better. The pro-choice movement uses the same rhetoric as the pro-slavery movement back before emancipation. Hey these aren't really people, its a fetus, its my property. Why dont you try not sleeping with men you wouldnt want to have a child with. Oh, but that's your choice to sleep with losers i suppose.

      • Posted By: IRegretNothing @ 10/17/2008 10:17:44 PM

        Wow.
        Ok, gotta speak up here. I had an abortion when I got pregnant with my then soon-to-be husband. Problem was, though I desperately wanted a baby, he was no where near ready to be a father, and we were no where near ready financially. Though we loved each other and wanted to be parents some day, it was not the right time. To go through with it was the MOST heart-wrenchingly painful thing I have ever experienced. But in MY religous beliefs I felt firm that I was freeing that child-spirit to be born some other time to someone who was ready for it. It was my decision and I made peace with it. I'm a mom now, and I can't express enough the joy I've experienced. I am glad I waited.
        We are human. Everyone makes mistakes. No one has the right to judge who deserves to control her reproduction. As a matter of fact, humans have used herbs for abortions for centuries. It's not a new thing. A pregnant rabbit's will absorb the fetuses back into her own body if the food sources are insufficient to support the litter. I wish we humans had that option.

        • Posted By: SomeChick1234 @ 10/17/2008 11:29:34 PM

          Are you telling me that you could not have prevented getting pregnant in the first place and therefore you had no options and abortion was your only one and if it was taken away that equates to you having NO control over reproduction????? Your logic is faulty. The truth is difficult to face, but face it you must. I am, indeed, Yoda.

    • Posted By: KeepinItReal @ 10/17/2008 8:07:06 PM

      If this helps you sleep at night.

      Abortion stops a beating heart. There is life...then it is gone.

  • Posted By: kakama @ 10/17/2008 8:04:15 PM

    What in the world is going on here? Pro-lifers, dont jus thalk the talk, walk the walk. How about all the Pro-lifers commit (on national tv) to adopting three children into their homes no matter the circustances of the children. With that kind of support there would be no need for abortion! Just get pregnant and drop the baby off at one of your houses. In fact, why dont we start a national registre of your names and see how many people apply.
    Tha fact of the matter is I'd rather see a women choose to have an abortion than have the child and the child is abused by some form or another.

    • Posted By: lmgctg @ 10/17/2008 8:35:16 PM

      Please...you'd rather kill a child in utero than abuse it out of utero? What exactly makes it so black-and-white for you? You're basically saying that if a woman doesn't have an abortion, the child is destined to be abused after its born. Not that you're making nonsensical, sweeping generalizations or anything. What...the mother just can't keep herself from beating her unwanted baby? What????? Again--pro-choicers--what is the deal with taking personal responsibility?? When exactly do you all plan on growing up?

      • Posted By: artemis8 @ 10/17/2008 8:47:26 PM

        why is it the mother who is beating her child? also, many adopted children are abused. anyway, you seem to be missing the point. if you want to talk sweeping generalizations take a look at your own statement. you are claiming that women who have abortions are not taking responsibility. not all women who become pregnant are sex fiends running around sleeping with men without birth control, getting knocked up, and having abortions as a form of birth control. when do you plan on getting a brain?

        • Posted By: SomeChick1234 @ 10/17/2008 11:23:08 PM

          There are lots of children abused by their natural parents. Abuse is irrelevant to this argument.

    • Posted By: blake55 @ 10/17/2008 8:30:47 PM

      By that logic we should do 'mercy' killings of all children who are being abused.

    • Posted By: lildiamond @ 10/17/2008 8:14:17 PM

      I agree wholeheartedly with this comment. Too many people say they are "PRO LIFE", but all this means is that they care about the fetus being born. However, once the child is alive, then to hell with helping an unwed mother feed, clothe or get health insurance.
      As this comment says "Walk the Walk" Pro-Lifers!! Don't have any biological children, as there are many children in foster care who also need a home...
      And before people say they would NEVER support abortion...I day don't judge those when you have never been in their shoes!

    • Posted By: KeepinItReal @ 10/17/2008 8:12:10 PM

      I'd rather see women not get pregnant if they are not ready to have a child.

  • Posted By: wolfganger @ 10/17/2008 11:03:07 PM

    Air quotes do not suggest a "total lack of regard" for a woman's health. It was simply another way of expressing his diapproval of stretching the meaning of "health" to excuse unnecessary abortions. Such inflamatory reactions are only a twist of a left biased perspective, no less than the lipstick and pig thing blown up by the conservatives. When will we stop reacting without thinking? Such a waste of words and time.

    • Posted By: Twister52 @ 10/17/2008 11:22:25 PM

      So airquotes are offensive now to the "liberated women"?!?!

      Wolfganger, please, don't try to explain reality to radical liberals. It only confuses them when reason and logic are used.

  • Posted By: swmn99 @ 10/17/2008 11:20:48 PM

    From my point of view, being pro-choice doesn't mean I support abortion. I only think abortion would be acceptable in the event of rape, incest, or the endangerment of the life of the mother. All other cases are unacceptable. Mental heath is not an acceptable reason. Now that my position is established, let me tell you why as a God fearing Christian. God gave us free will to make our decisions as we see fit. God is the only one who is truly right and able to judge us. Were are not to judge one another. I support "Choice" because I believe God gives us the "Choice" to do as we feel. It may not be right, but that is why Jesus was sent to die for our sins. We humans are not perfect and cannot attempt to be. For this reason, I am able to be pro-choice and let God judge those who have abortions. I don't think having an abortion is an easy decision (no matter how it is portrayed on tv), and people have to live with the consequences. I also do not think myself, being a man, has the absolute right to tell a woman she cannot do that because I cannot possibly be in her shoes. I also do not think the government shoud outlaw abortions across the board, because it will still happen because some people choose to do this. Even Sarah Palin said her daughter "chose" to have her baby. The key word is Choice, and we all have one. Let God judge us in the end. I also want to point to another topic. Obama does not support abortions. What he supports is the "choice". He does not want the "choice" to go away. After the third debate, he really cemented home a point that no one seems to be talking about. It is called unwanted pregnancies. If we can find a way to get rid of unwanted pregnancies through education, abstinence, and contraceptives, then we won't have to worry about abortions, because if there isn't an unwanted pregnancy, then there is no reason to have an abortion. People have pre-marital sex all the time. It goes against the "church", but not everybody is religous. I disagree with the Catholic Church about their sex education of abstinence only and no use of contraceptives. They are just burying their head in the sand on the issue of pre-marital sex. It is out there and it isn't going away, so let's get together and do something about it.

  • Posted By: hfc2834 @ 10/17/2008 11:19:44 PM

    Why is it called a fetus when a woman chooses an abortion and called an unborn child when someone kills a pregnant woman? Why do people who support life call themselves Pro-life and people who support abortion not call themselves Pro-death instead of making it sound like there really is a choice that is going to be made? So, where's the men in all of this? If the woman you love chooses to terminate your child, then it's okay? Maybe after the first abortion, a woman should be sterilized, therefore keeping her from making that choice again. And, the offending male - sterilize him too....then he can't go around impregnating women. Men don't seem to take any responsiblity for any of these "choices" When we adopted our daughter, people constantly said "How can a mother give up her child?" My answer was always "How can a mother kill her child? Wasn't adoption a better choice?"

  • Posted By: ishagrace2 @ 10/17/2008 8:27:17 PM

    I believe in a woman's right to CHOOSE! Even Sarah Palin admitted that her pregnant teenaged daughter "CHOSE" to have her baby. Many women CHOOSE NOT to have abortions, and that is their right, just as it is the right of other women to CHOOSE to HAVE an abortion, and NO ONE has the right to tell another woman what to do with her body. To FORCE a rape victim to carry a pregnancy to term is downright cruel. Even then, some women CHOOSE to do just that. The point is that it is their CHOICE!
    To suggest that a woman's health or even life is ok to risk for an unborn child is insane. People, this is America, where we should be able to have our own choices, not be subjected to the demands and opinions of others who wish to force their will upon others.

    • Posted By: SomeChick1234 @ 10/17/2008 11:17:45 PM

      Absolutely! The only fetuses we should protect are the fetuses who have given up their parasitic nature and find their own means of gustation.

  • Posted By: kathie2ark @ 10/17/2008 11:15:19 PM

    When is someone going to start telling the truth? Every four years we go through this, the right uses abortion as a moral spear and the left uses Roe to extort women into voting their way. The truth is, Roe is not going to be overturned without a Constitutional amendment, and in 30 years of working in the medical field I have never seen nor heard of a so-called later-term abortion. Abortion implies killng the fetus. To terminate a pregnancy with a viable fetus is called induction of labor, and short of infanticide which is illegal, any baby born breathing would be taken to the NICU regardless of the mother's wishes. Enough of this outrageous pandering and distortion. Shame on you, you should know better.

  • Posted By: Trottwood @ 10/17/2008 6:36:35 PM

    shorty22, you are ABSOLUTELY right. Do WHATEVER you want to your body.
    Abortion, however, is not killing the woman. It is killing another entirely different body(the baby's body).
    That's not ok. It's not religious- it's common sense.

    • Posted By: shorty22 @ 10/17/2008 7:04:43 PM

      If it is in my body its still my choice... I decide thats how great this country it is our own individual choice. we dont have to agree. If you want a country where one religion decides the laws, and what is right and wrong... go elswhere. Diversity is waht makes this nation so great.

  • Posted By: *Straighttalker* @ 10/17/2008 11:14:58 PM

    What McCain was obviously trying to imply is that "health" is used to include almost anything by abortionists. And FYI Obama is extremely liberal about abortion, do your research. He wants to grant "abortion on demand" to teenagers, without their parents knowledge! Evil. Heck, I think most politicians are crooks. But I could only imagine what other moral boundaries a person would cross who is okay with innocent babies being killed.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse