The Money Man

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

. Greenspan heartily endorsed Bernanke as his successor in 2006—just before the markets turned. Since then, to a startling degree, Bernanke has quietly repudiated the laissez-faire approach of Greenspan. The former Fed chief, whose mantra was that the market was doing fine assessing the risk of "derivatives" on its own, declined to write even marginal regulations for mortgage lending for 14 years despite the 1994 congressional mandate to do so. But Bernanke, in July 2008—far too late to make a difference in the subprime scandal—announced a new "Regulation Z," which finally created some common-sense lending rules such as forbidding mortgages without sufficient documentation. Bernanke is tending toward the conclusion that the Fed is going to have to deal with bubbles before they go on too long. He's still leery of using interest rates to "pop" bubbles, just as Greenspan once shied away from containing "irrational exuberance." But Bernanke believes regulation and oversight will have to be rethought in a major way. The key, he knows, is not to overdo it as in Japan—another economy he has studied closely.

Bernanke does, however, share some qualities with Greenspan. Both were child prodigies at math—"Ben was in first grade for two weeks, and the teacher said he doesn't belong here and put him in second grade," says his Uncle Mort—and both are musicians. Both men are conservative acolytes of arch-free-marketer Milton Friedman. But there the similarities end. While Greenspan leans toward libertarianism—the idea that markets work fine on their own, and government should keep out—Bernanke made his grade at Princeton teaching and studying the greatest market failure of modern times. (Bernanke always loved history as a kid, but he gravitated toward economics—and his study of the Depression—because it was about real people rather than kings and queens.)

Asked how he's managed to stay calmly at the center of the whirlwind all these weeks—with his life's work on the line—Bernanke just shrugs. He still manages to spend some Clark Kent time with his wife, Anna, doing the New York Times crossword puzzle together and watching favorite shows like "House." (Bernanke jokes that as an economist, he's appalled at all the money Dr. House spends in ordering MRIs.) Even so, the Fed chief knows he's not going to have much leisure time in the months ahead. Paulson will almost certainly depart with the new administration. Bernanke—whose term runs until 2010—will have to make his case all over again with a new Congress next January. A lot is riding on his success in doing that. Both the Fed and the Treasury—and by implication the American taxpayer—have gained the kind of authority over the U.S. economy that no one would have dreamed of a few months ago. As a man who began as a small-town boy from Dillon, S.C., says Braddy, Bernanke "understands Main Street as well as he does Wall Street." He will need to make heroic efforts to save both in the years ahead.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/27/2008 8:17:55 AM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

    2001 Chicago Public Citizen Radio Interview criticizing the Warren Court as not radical enough for not pursuing redistribution of wealth.

    Says that community organizing is for the purpose of assembling the political power to force redistribution of wealth.

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/26/2008 9:35:29 PM

    The Kennedy tax cut.

    http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1765.cfm

    About half way through the article.

    "President Kennedy proposed massive tax-rate reductions, which were passed by Congress and became law after he was assassinated. The 1964 tax cut reduced the top marginal personal income tax rate from 91 percent to 70 percent by 1965. The cut reduced lower-bracket rates as well. In the four years prior to the 1965 tax-rate cuts, federal government income tax revenue--adjusted for inflation--increased at an average annual rate of 2.1 percent, while total government income tax revenue (federal plus state and local) increased by 2.6 percent per year . In the four years following the tax cut, federal government income tax revenue increased by 8.6 percent annually and total government income tax revenue increased by 9.0 percent annually. Government income tax revenue not only increased in the years following the tax cut, it increased at a much faster rate.
    The Kennedy tax cut set the example that President Ronald Reagan would follow some 17 years later. By increasing incentives to work, produce, and invest, real GDP growth increased in the years following the tax cuts: More people worked, and the tax base expanded. Additionally, the expenditure side of the budget benefited as well because the unemployment rate was significantly reduced.
    Using the Congressional Budget Office's revenue forecasts (made with the full knowledge of the future tax cuts), revenues came in much higher than had been anticipated, even after the "cost""of the tax cut had been taken into account. Additionally, in 1965--one year following the tax cut--personal income tax revenue data exceeded expectations by the greatest amounts in the highest income classes.
    Testifying before Congress in 1977, Walter Heller, President Kenned''s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, summarized:
    What happened to the tax cut in 1965 is difficult to pin down, but insofar as we are able to isolate it, it did seem to have a tremendously stimulative effect, a multiplied effect on the economy. It was the major factor that led to our running a $3 billion surplus by the middle of 1965 before escalation in Vietnam struck us. It was a $12 billion tax cut, which would be about $33 or $34 billion in today's terms, and within one year the revenues into the Federal Treasury were already above what they had been before the tax cut.
    Did the tax cut pay for itself in increased revenues? I think the evidence is very strong that it did."

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/23/2008 6:59:15 PM

    Obama in this video, addressing his work with ACORN litigation relating to the community reinvestment act and the failure of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, as they relate to the current real estate and financial crisis, states that, and I quote:

    "Subprime lending started out as a good idea, helping Americans buy homes who previously could not afford to. Financial institutions created new financial instruments that could securitize these loans, slice them into finer and finer risk categories, and spread them out among investors and around the country, as well as around the world. In theory, this should have allowed mortgage lending to be less risky, and more diversified."

    He further states:

    ???"The original idea was a good one, which was, lets see if we can distribute risk more broadly, and make it easier to provide loans to people who otherwise might not be able to get one."

    Listen for yourself. You cannot dispute the mans on words recorded live:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related

    Obama in this second video is campaigning at a convention of Acorn and I believe two other "Community Activist" organizations. Ask if he will be their ally if he becomes President, Obama says, quote:

    ???Yes, but let me say that before I even get inaugurated, during the transition we are going to be calling all of you in to help us shape the agenda. We???re going to be having meetings all across the country with community organizations so that you have input into the agenda for the next presidency of the United States of America.

    See and hear it for yourself. Obama promised that Acorn and other groups like it will setting his agenda if elected:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vJcVgJhNaU
    See also: http://www.newsweek.com/id/164972
    Stating that Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act wasn't what caused the meltdown, and noting that "economists on both sides of the political spectrum have suggested that the act has probably made the crisis less severe than it might otherwise have been."
    See also:
    http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?threadid=808692&boardsparam=Page%3d2

    Below is a link to C-SPAN video clips of the Congressional hearings at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix Fannie and Freddie. See for yourself who said what.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
    See also
    http://www.newsweek.com/id/164732 from this web site. (oops!) stating that Freddie Mac was spending tax payer money to target Republicans in 2005 who were trying to regulate Fannie and Freddies fraud. Democrats were not targeted, as the were all in the tank with Fannie and Freddie to kill the regulations. Hear that, the article admits that Republicans were trying to regulate Freddie and Fannie, and Democrats were trying to stop it from happening as a means to facilitate the Community Reinvestment Act.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.


 
 
PHOTOS
What About Us?
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.