The Case for Barack Obama

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Chronichead @ 10/20/2008 4:40:32 PM

    For those who include Barack's Arabic middle name in your posts:

    The only people who will respond to the fear-mongering you are attempting by mentioning that Barack's "Hussein" are the same ignorant, uncultured, and small-minded people who are already voting for McCain, so why not save yourself the time, and energy of having to type those extra 7 letters?

    • Posted By: Unbridled Truth @ 10/20/2008 8:36:22 PM

      I know this might sound a little self-aggrandizing but from what I have seen and read these past these past few months the only ones who support McCain are ignorant, uncultured, and small-minded people who don't give a rat's bottom about the well-being of the majority, or for that matter, the truth. I guess I am "old fashioned" and "idealistic" in my desire to have "representatives" who are honest and tell the TRUTH. 30 lashes with a wet banana for me for believing in the precepts of the US Constitution. I guess I should have known better.

  • Posted By: LadyBeryl @ 10/20/2008 8:31:54 PM

    Excellent commentary. Thanks so much for sharing your personal insight. Once Obama becomes our president, I pray that the racists will recognize the value of UNITY to solve our nation's problems. I pray they put aside their biases and embrace the joy of being on the correct side of history.

  • Posted By: The Dominican @ 10/20/2008 8:01:05 PM

    BIAS alter your judgement

  • Posted By: ArnBk8 @ 10/20/2008 3:05:23 PM

    CBCSBA You write, "The liberals want to take God out of everything our forefathers fought for. " Read your history, ignoramus. And, before that, the Constitution. The Founders suffered from the unity of God & State, & that's why the First (not 43rd) Amendment uncoupled the two. The Founders experienced the tyranny that resulted worldwide when the State established a particular view of God as official & recoiled from that.

    • Posted By: CBCSGA @ 10/20/2008 4:32:56 PM

      Nobody said which god in the Comment jerk. I don't care what religion you are, or if you have none. Like every other society I do not mind tradition if it does not hurt the people. Our politicians spend time trying to undo the Pledge, tell me I can't pray for our children's safety before a ballgame, etc. when it should be helping the needy (here and abroad), protecting our borders, and keeping our economy stable and healthy.

      • Posted By: ArnBk8 @ 10/20/2008 7:27:47 PM

        Nobody is interfering with your precious right to pray, CB, or The Pledge. Separation of Church & State means only that the government has no rights to MAKE me pray to your God or anyone's. Again, re-read the Constitution.

  • Posted By: vernbinion11 @ 10/20/2008 7:27:38 PM

    Your op-ed is excellently written, and makes a valid case for an Obama presidency, which is likely to occur due to his ability to run an effective and well funded campaign in addition to being a very gifted man. The American electorate, while being largely slightly right of center, has embraced him. While I don't discount that an Obama presidency may be a success, I am extremely doubtful, given the likely, highly left leaning congress he will inherit.

    Your piece concludes with a touching mention of your 9-year-old son, about whose future you are confident. However, you are ignoring some critical facts. According to the Congressional Budget Office estimates and actual recent history, government revenues have historically been 18 to 20% of GDP. These revenues have
    remained constant even after the Bush tax cuts. The Bush deficits are a result of higher than projected government spending above the 2000, and even post Bush tax cut 2003, CBO estimates. This fact is the real "failure of the Bush economic policies." Currently about half of government revenues are spent on the three main entitlement programs: Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. By the time your son is 50, these program expenditures are projected to double. In order for the United States to shoulder those costs, government revenues would have to increase to 38% of GDP, according to the CBO, in order for us to continue the activities we currently pursue, such as foreign aid and having the most powerful military in the world. To create those receipts, our economy would have to grow at a rate of 10% a year. This won't happen. So the other option would be to increase taxes, increase our national debt, and curtail the role we play in the world. Increasing taxes will reduce government revenues, reduce employment, lower incomes, and, in short, will result in our being a nation with a more European style economy and role in the world. The "American Dream" of our parent's generation will not be available to the generation that follows us. Only McCain stands willing to tackle these difficult and unpopular problems. When Bush proposed in 2005 that "all options were on the table" to overhaul social security, Nancy Pelosi is quoted as saying "Not no, but Hell no." This attitude will continue with the congress Senator Obama will partner with. If a nationalized health care program and other Obama proposed government spending are added to these current entitlement programs before they are reformed, the problem will only worsen.

  • Posted By: gumshooed @ 10/20/2008 6:22:18 PM

    Never have I heard Sen Obama speak ill of anyone nor his ads. He stays with the facts of his campaign and clearly defines what his policy is compared to Mccain's. Never has he mentioned her as being a Nazi-sympathizer but its good to know she is.

    • Posted By: lstm1 @ 10/20/2008 7:12:23 PM

      So if I understand your logic, you think its okay to claim that Palin is a nazi-sympathizer based on erroneous information, but you think its racist to claim that Obama is a Moslem (also based on erroneous information)? Strikes me that both sides are lying, but apparently you have some inside information which confirms that Palin loves Nazis and Obama never lies?

    • Posted By: lstm1 @ 10/20/2008 6:53:54 PM

      http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sparring_in_spanish.html

      Maybe you don't know Spanish? If you did know Spanish, then you would have seen these campaign ads by both Obama and McCain. As shown by Factcheck.org, both ads lied to the spanish-language audiences. In the case of Obama's ad, he not only lied by suggesting that McCain and Limbaugh saw eye-to-eye on immigration (which they clearly didn't), but it also took Limbaugh's comments (which referred to ex-pats living in Mexico, not about Mexicans living in the US) out of context. Can you really be so naive as to claim that Obama doesn't run negative ads?

    • Posted By: lstm1 @ 10/20/2008 6:48:18 PM

      http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2008/08/obama-camp-conn.html

      If you look at the link above, you'll see that Obama's spokesman referred to Palin as a nazi-sympathizer in the Miami Herald. Why? Because he mistakenly thought that she had supported Pat Buchanan (which she didn't) and Buchanan wrote about nazis, therefore Palin must be a nazi-sympathizer. Or so the logic goes from the Obama campaign. This was all because the Obama campaign thought that by associating Palin with nazis, she would be able to obtain the Jewish vote in Miami.

  • Posted By: CoffeeeeCandy @ 10/20/2008 4:57:29 PM

    What evidence supports that McCain will do a smashing good job in the ecomomic crisis? he is spilling the same ideal as Bush You are so blind as you were Blind when you voted for Bush 4 years ago

    • Posted By: Unbridled Truth @ 10/20/2008 7:09:54 PM

      Please read my post again. I am not supporting McCain. I think McCain is so dangerous that I will vote for Obama even thought I don't think democratic party is the answer to our problems. Furthermore, I did not not vote for Bush, EVER! And when I opposed invading Iraq, I was called a anti-American, Unpatriotic and a terroist lover. Yet, today, I am vindicated .... the justifications for that war as presented to the American people have proven to be a pack of lies. Even if those how attacked me for speaking my mind at the time, have yet to apologize. I was right then and I am right now. McCain and those who support him, his lies and his fear-mongering propaganda are dangerous to the unity and the future of this nation.

    • Posted By: Unbridled Truth @ 10/20/2008 6:35:14 PM

      To add to your post, Americans need to remember that McCain has been part of the system for the past 26 years, has supported the Bush Administration more than he has opposed it, had a close relationship with Gordon Liddy and was involved with the last mortgage scandal, the S&L crisis of the 80's and 90's. In fact, he took over 100K from Charles Keating who was convicted of 79 counts of fraud for his part in that mortgage crisis. And lets not forget one of his closest advisors and friends is none only than Phil Gramm, who made (with his wife as board member) millions on the Enron scandal and authored the bill that made credit-default-swaps, legal (one of the biggest contributers to the current economic crisis). Gramm also authored McCain's Economic Plan.

      McCain is one of the Elite who benefits from the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, and made money on the S & L crisis. He is, now, worth over 100 million dollars (compare that to Obama's 1 million, mostly from writing and selling books) and has more houses than he can even remember ( 7 of them, all worth over 1.5 million dollars each). Lets not forget, McCain, along with Obama, voted for the 700 Billion dollar bail out that effectively nationalizes (socializes) the financial industry. At least, Obama insisted on conditions that should benefit the average tax payer before casting his vote.

      I do, however, understand the support McCain gets from the ignorant who dream that they will ???someday??? have the opportunity to have such wealth. You can't deny them their dreams, even if it is a fairytale. Apparently, it would be unAmerican to dash their unrealistic dreams.

      Hopefully, on November 5th, we will find that the majority of Americans are honest, discerning and informed voters who will not vote for the oracle of lies, hate, division fear-mongering, and fascist propaganda. While I do not believe the Democratic party is not part of the problem, nor do I believe that they are not, often, more invested in partisan politics, earmarks and ruled by lobbyists and big business than they are invested in representing the majority who put them in office in the first place, I know that a vote for anyone other than Obama, in this election, is a vote for another 4-8 years of the lies, war, and the economic destruction of the middle class over the Oligarchy that has been ruling this nation for years. Under McCain, we will see nothing but the same crap we have seen during the past 8 years.

  • Posted By: ArnBk8 @ 10/20/2008 6:59:48 PM

    CBCSBA You write, "The liberals want to take God out of everything our forefathers fought for. " Read your history, ignoramus. And, before that, the Constitution. The Founders suffered from the unity of God & State, & that's why the First (not 43rd) Amendment uncoupled the two. The Founders experienced the tyranny that resulted worldwide when the State established a particular view of God as official & recoiled from that. Ever hear of the separation of Church & State, Mr. American-maybe-by-birth-only? Or maybe you think that applies to every other church but yours, whose definition of God should be the law of the land? What are you conserving, Mr. Proud-to-Call-Himself-a-Conservative? It's sure not the United States Constitution.

  • Posted By: J Rodrigues @ 10/20/2008 4:32:42 PM

    As an European, I can look at these elections in 2 ways: the selfish way and the neutral way.

    From a selfish p.o.v., I only care about the direct impact this well have in the rest of the world. And from that perspective, I see almost a tie: Obama will be much better for international political relations. McCain on the other hand is a better bet on international economical relations, being more for free-trade.

    From a neutral and wider p.o.v., and looking at this from the perspective on what's best for the US itself (from its economy to everything else, health care and education included) Obama is the best bet hands down. If you are not careful, the US may descend into a gradual downspiral of competitiveness, becoming the 20th century Brasil of the 21st century: a country less and less competitive (for thinking that it should compete on low taxes and wages, rather than R&D and a highly skilled workforce); a country more and more plagued with crime, appaling inequality and social tensions.

    Anyway... it's your choice.

    • Posted By: joe_mama @ 10/20/2008 6:06:06 PM

      Actually, England is the more appropriate comparison, but good point nonetheless.

      One thing, however: free trade is a negative this year, both candiates claim it costs American jobs (which, if you understand economics, is absurd). Free trade will remain on the table, but neither candidate will publicly endorse it.

      JM

      • Posted By: lstm1 @ 10/20/2008 6:38:52 PM

        Only one candidate wants to renegotiate NAFTA - Barack Obama. Only one candidate doesn't want to establish a free trade agreement with Colombia - Barack Obama. Therefore I don't see how free trade is a wash. Logic suggests that if you support free trade, you should support McCain.

    • Posted By: lstm1 @ 10/20/2008 6:06:02 PM

      Not sure I'm following your logic here. What evidence do you have that Obama would be better for education? Certainly the limited experience in this area suggests that he has been a total failure. Yes, he does want to follow the teachers unions and give them more money (and make sure they aren't held accountable for the poor education being provided). Obama strongly opposes giving parent's the choice of which school they can send their children to, a right which has been proven highly successful in European countries such as Belgium.

      As far as the US becoming less competitive, this is only likely to occur with attempts to protect out own industries. It is McCain who supports free trade; Obama who wants to empower unions and prevent trade with emerging economies such as those in Colombia. Obama wants to renegotiate NAFTA; not McCain.

      I have lived in Europe (UK) and currently live in Mexico. I've seen the many positive things that have occurred as a result of NAFTA. The thought that Obama would renegotiate NAFTA just to pander to his union supporters is, in my opinion, the most frightening prospect of all. How exactly would this make the US more competitive?

  • Posted By: teamdirtdogs @ 10/20/2008 5:37:40 PM

    I listened to Colin Powell's asking what was wrong with a Muslim American boy dreaming about becoming President one day and he put into words what represents the greatest part of America. As a first generation immigrant, this country has given me opportunities I did not have in my country of birth, and I want to believe that my child will have opportunities that will be unlimited by race, religion, gender. I've listened to negative remarks about Muslims, and though that is not my religion, I have many friends I love and respect who are, and I find the remarks ignorant and hurtful. Yet with all that we face as a nation, after what we've gone thru with 9/11, the frontrunner at this time is a man born to an African father, an American mother, who has a part-Asian half-sister, and that says a lot for the openness, the generosity, and the *positive* aspects of this great country and a political system that *does* give us all choices.

    • Posted By: joe_mama @ 10/20/2008 5:59:19 PM

      Of course, now the right wants to paint Colin Powell as an "Afro-centrist" or a political opportunist. These people do not represent America or American values and we need to take back control of the country from them so that EVERYBODY can dream.

      JM

  • Posted By: Concerned Canadian @ 10/18/2008 8:47:47 PM

    You know something Fareed.....I'd love to debate you but you're beneath my intelligence and I also don't associate myself with radical Muslims such as yourself so you should be very grateful you can breathe in the home of the brave and the land of the free.
    Let me tell you something.....your "friend" Obama has pretty thin skin and does not exercise restraint. He's demonstrated throughout the Democratic primaries and now in the general election he gets annoyed pretty easily at anything thats disparaging or truthful statements he can't defend thats directed at him. He personally takes on the grievance...not Presidential my friend....he gets rattled easily...thats not leadership.
    You think that a person who runs for President has to publicly ridicule an average American citizen who asked him a question that embarassed him ...now is that really necessary ? ...no...it shows insecurity and immaturity. I can go all night with thousands of incidents where Obama reduced himself to a person not worthy of the stature to be called a Commander-In-Chief.....so Fareed..I just have to say to you think before you talk , write or think because up until know anything you have done is just pure garbage and in the famous words of Bill O'Reilly.....you sir are a Pinhead !!

    • Posted By: Iconoblaster @ 10/20/2008 6:11:54 PM

      So this is what a bigot sounds like while he's foaming at the mouth.

  • Posted By: J Rodrigues @ 10/20/2008 4:21:07 PM

    "Most of the 'Rich' Europeans come here for their health care, because we have the best quality care in the world."

    LOL

    Well, I would be surprised if more than 0,01% of the Europeans went to the US for health care reasons.

    The fact is: top health care in the US is one of the finest in the world. There's no denying that.

    The second fact is: average health care in the US is appalling by European average standards. I know what I am talking about, since I know both systems well (and BTW there are significant differences within Europe).

    So if you are one of the wealthiest individuals anywhere in the world, yes, going to the US is probably a good choice (even though there are other developed nations where you will be very well served, too). But if you are not in the top 5% of the wealthiest people in the US or Europe, you will be much better off in Europe.

    And all this spending half as much in health care as in the US (note: private PLUS public spending altogether, as a nation). Not bad for a bunch of "Socialists" , huh?

    Honestly: get real. If you believe Europe is crowded with Socialist states, then you should really get out more often...

    • Posted By: quincyadams @ 10/20/2008 4:28:45 PM

      to think healthcare is cheaper or better in Europe or anywhere else is naive. You simply pay for it in your ridiculously high taxes and so when you actually need it , it may seem a small convenience to wait in line for it and pay some smaller amount. If the R&D for healthcare was paid for by those benefitting from from it and not just the US citizens there might be a bigger uproar about the costs globally...

      • Posted By: J Rodrigues @ 10/20/2008 4:45:31 PM

        "to think healthcare is cheaper or better in Europe or anywhere else is naive. You simply pay for it in your ridiculously high taxes "

        You obviously didn't read my comment thoroughly.

        Health care spending in Western Europe - that is, *private* (ie what you pay from your pocket) PLUS *public* (ie what the state pays, which comes from people's taxes) health care spending - is on average HALF as % of GDP of that in the US. This is a fact.

        There are several reasons for this, but one of them is clearly that having a significant chunk of that spending taken care by the state (yes, with collected taxes...) is *clearly* more efficient.

        It's a question of efficiency, above all. Ah: and by the way: in those "Socialist" European countries public spending on average only accounts for half to 2/3 of total health care spending. The image that Health Care is is a monopoly of the state is one of those typical stereotypes or mis-conceptions, usually bred in ignorance and idealized biases.

        • Posted By: Unbridled Truth @ 10/20/2008 6:01:15 PM

          You forgot to mention the capitalistic ideal that has effected the cost of health care. In the US, insurance companies have spent in excess of 500 billion dollars in compensation for the top 23 Health Insurance, Lab and Pharmaceutical Company CEO's during the past 5 years. The top CEO, according to Forbes Magazine, earned 297 million dollars in 5 year period while our premiums have increased exponentially, our wages have been cut and our jobs have disappeared, in that same time period. In 1440 the average CEO made 28 times the average worker. Today, the average CEO makes 292 times the average worker.

          I guess being a good American means supporting this kind of individual CEO compensation, even if it means 50 million Americans are priced out of the Health Insurance market, millions more are under insured and Nurse Assistants are paid, on average $7.00 per hour, and therefore can't afford health insurance themselves. Who cares if the majority are overpaying or suffering because they can not get basic health care?

          According to some definitions the UK and Canada are Socialist Nations because their health care systems are not based on profit for the minority. Funny, I live in Florida. The Canadians flock here annually to live in the US during the winter, but all of them make sure they go back before the deadline so they do not lose their health insurance benefits. Apparently, according to J. Rodriguez and those of the same opinion, the Canadians are really ignorant because they believe their health care system is superior to the American FOR PROFIT health care system that they return to Canada simply at the appointed time, simply so as not to lose their health care and retirement benefits. The fact that the infant mortality in the US is 29th among industrialized nations is apparently acceptable to many Americans, as long as it is health care is a commodity to be bought and sold to the highest bidder, and someone is getting rich off the needs and/or suffering of others.

          God Bless America, the Republican Party, the ultra rich and the fairy tale that the average American will ever ever achieve the American Dream. Capitalism, or rather excessive riches for the few, has become more important to our leaders than the Constitution and the majority of the American Citizenry.

          Thank J. Rodriguez and those of you that echo the sentiment posted, for reminding me that that the American Dream is a fairytale in the face of reality.

  • Posted By: krohn2 @ 10/20/2008 5:55:43 PM

    That's why I think it is a joke that Obama is getting a boost from this whole economic crisis. This guy is more slippery than Teflon Don! Nothing sticks! When you have unlimited resources from multi Billionaires like George soros that can buy the media for you, you can get away with murder because nobody will ever know about it! George Soros finally found a candidate that could be bought. A guy with no qualifications but with an excessive ego who actually thinks it's all about him when he is only a pawn in Soro's game to play God with the whole world and shape it to his whim! Do you know how the Obama camp is going to get more votes on election day? His task force is going to go into poor neighborhoods offering cigarettes, money and maybe even drugs to street thugs in exchange for their votes. Colin Powell is talking about his endorsement of Obama because of his "steadiness". When you are confident that the election is bought and payed for of course you are going to be "steady", whatever that means. He does not have to prove himself or do much work like he demonstrated in the last debate!

  • Posted By: josemarti @ 10/20/2008 5:55:14 PM

    Human All Too Human. How these liberals worship at the altar of the god they have dreamed up! Nietzsche will you also turn out to be the prophet of the 21st century?

  • Posted By: krohn2 @ 10/20/2008 5:54:21 PM

    http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_referralObject=3156733&maven_referralPlaylistId=&sRevUrl=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/

  • Posted By: jctaylor11 @ 10/20/2008 5:40:29 PM

    Actually, Joshua would not have been in favor of abortion or same-sex marriage, and would probably be considered a bigot by many of today's liberals...I understand the economy is a disaster right now, but I wish conservatives would not give up on these important issues. I agree that we do need a Joshua, but just don't believe that man is Obama. he is a great speaker, but I just can't agree with his underlying far far left liberal beliefs, sorry.

  • Posted By: dbarabin@yahoo.com @ 10/20/2008 5:36:54 PM

    Amen! John McCain is an honorable man. He should have been at least nominated for the Presidency in 2000. He was drummed out of the running by lies and innuendo. He loves America. His time is past. After eight years of decaying in the wilderness we need a Joshua to lead us in the right direction while asking for shared sacrifice. That Joshua is Barack Obama. He has the makings of a great President. I look forward o following his lead.

  • Posted By: SuzInKS @ 10/20/2008 5:34:27 PM

    Excellent job at making your case for supporting Obama. Fareed Zakaria is a very balanced journalist. I thought this was an extremely well written article. The negative, narrowing campaign we've seen McCain run has made me more cynical about politics. But its people like Fareed-looking at the future we want our children to have that is inclusive, innovative, and safe that makes me feel positive about the direction we are heading. BTW-GPS is a terrific program if you want to get a better understanding of our place in the world!

  • Posted By: SuzInKS @ 10/20/2008 5:34:11 PM

    Excellent job at making your case for supporting Obama. Fareed Zakaria is a very balanced journalist. I thought this was an extremely well written article. The negative, narrowing campaign we've seen McCain run has made me more cynical about politics. But its people like Fareed-looking at the future we want our children to have that is inclusive, innovative, and safe that makes me feel positive about the direction we are heading. BTW-GPS is a terrific program if you want to get a better understanding of our place in the world!

  • Posted By: jctaylor11 @ 10/20/2008 5:29:38 PM

    I'm not saying that I'm a huge McCain fan, but this article looses a lot of credibility when it says that neither of the candidates has any experience. All McCain has ever done is serve our country, and has TONS of experience in war and foreign affairs, which last time I checked was an issue that we are facing right now. I'm just tired of dumb reporters being so one sided - what ever happened to real journalism???

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse