The Case for Barack Obama

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/23/2008 7:08:00 PM

    Obama in this video, addressing his work with ACORN litigation relating to the community reinvestment act and the failure of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, as they relate to the current real estate and financial crisis, states that, and I quote:

    "Subprime lending started out as a good idea, helping Americans buy homes who previously could not afford to. Financial institutions created new financial instruments that could securitize these loans, slice them into finer and finer risk categories, and spread them out among investors and around the country, as well as around the world. In theory, this should have allowed mortgage lending to be less risky, and more diversified."

    He further states:

    ???"The original idea was a good one, which was, lets see if we can distribute risk more broadly, and make it easier to provide loans to people who otherwise might not be able to get one."

    Listen for yourself. You cannot dispute the mans on words recorded live:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related

    Obama in this second video is campaigning at a convention of Acorn and I believe two other "Community Activist" organizations. Ask if he will be their ally if he becomes President, Obama says, quote:

    ???Yes, but let me say that before I even get inaugurated, during the transition we are going to be calling all of you in to help us shape the agenda. We???re going to be having meetings all across the country with community organizations so that you have input into the agenda for the next presidency of the United States of America.

    See and hear it for yourself. Obama promised that Acorn and other groups like it will setting his agenda if elected:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vJcVgJhNaU
    See also: http://www.newsweek.com/id/164972
    Stating that Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act wasn't what caused the meltdown, and noting that "economists on both sides of the political spectrum have suggested that the act has probably made the crisis less severe than it might otherwise have been."
    See also:
    http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?threadid=808692&boardsparam=Page%3d2

    Below is a link to C-SPAN video clips of the Congressional hearings at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix Fannie and Freddie. See for yourself who said what.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
    See also
    http://www.newsweek.com/id/164732 from this web site. (oops!) stating that Freddie Mac was spending tax payer money to target Republicans in 2005 who were trying to regulate Fannie and Freddies fraud. Democrats were not targeted, as the were all in the tank with Fannie and Freddie to kill the regulations. Hear that, the article admits that Republicans were trying to regulate Freddie and Fannie, and Democrats were trying to stop it from happening as a means to facilitate the Community Reinvestment Act.

  • Posted By: Independant Voter @ 10/23/2008 6:36:45 PM

    It is time for real change in this country - someone who is smart and understands the economy. Obama has won me over with his intelligence and his knowledge - this is an easy choice!

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/23/2008 6:04:41 PM

    Three surveys -- from the Associated Press-GfK, George Washington University and an Investors Business Daily/TIPP poll - - show McCain closing the gap with Obama.

    The AP poll puts Obama at 44 percent to McCain's 43 percent, compared with a 7 percentage point advantage for Obama in their September survey. The GW Battleground poll showed Obama's edge at 2 points, down from 7 points in the middle of October, while the IDB/TIPP tracking survey has the margin for the Democrat narrowing to 1 point from 5 points at the start of the week.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aWRlkNLTILM8&refer=home


    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27324419/

    AP poll: Candidates running nearly even 10/22/08

    Neck-and-neck results are a departure from many recent national polls
    WASHINGTON - The presidential race tightened after the final debate, with John McCain gaining among whites and people earning less than $50,000, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll that shows McCain and Barack Obama essentially running even among likely voters in the election homestretch.

    The poll, which found Obama at 44 percent and McCain at 43 percent, supports what some Republicans and Democrats privately have said in recent days: that the race narrowed after the third debate as Republican-leaning voters drifted home to their party.

    • Posted By: Independant Voter @ 10/23/2008 6:35:39 PM

      These polls have all been DISCREDITED - one showed McCain with 78% of the 18-24 year old vote (yea - right!). The legitimate polls (ie mainstream - non-partisan) still show Barack Obama with a 10 -14% lead in most states.

  • Posted By: big_4 @ 10/21/2008 10:06:10 PM

    Dear Mr. Zakaria,

    With all due respect, the article that I just finished reading is crap.

    First off, let me ask: Does Zakaria's endorsement of Obama surprise anybody? Mr. Zakaria, you have been campaigning for Senator Obama for a year and a half now through your articles and public appearences. Anybody who cannot deduce that is delusional.

    And thats the word of the day: Delusion.

    The parade of delusion that is the campaign of Senator Obama grows more and more absurd and outrageous with every vague and biased article you write. You mention no numbers, no facts, no history, in any of your articles. They lack substance, much like the man who you claim to admire so much.

    American people, read the facts, not the spin. Go to the primary source. Go straight to the senate voting record of both Senators. You'll find that Obama votes with the far left 86% of the time. That is a fact. Google it.

    You'll find that Obama's only piece of major legislation over his three short years in congress is something called the Democratic Republic of the Congo Relief, Security, and And Democracy Protection Act. This act has nothing to do with 'change' or 'hope,' the vague principals that Obama touts. And neither do any other pieces of legislation backed by Senator Obama.

    You'll find that Obama opposed the surge, an operation which worked sucessfully in Iraq. He opposes a surge in Afgainistan. You were wrong on Iraq so why should we believe you on Afganistan?

    You'll find that Obama's 95% tax 'cut' isnt a cut at all--its a check. A check that the 45% of americans who already dont pay taxes would get. In his plan, not once does Obama say he will cut taxes. There is a difference between keeping more of the money you've earned and getting money that some one else has earned. When the later occurs, as i would in Obama's plan, there is no promise of a cut. You'll get your check--only your taxes will skyrocket.

    I'm sick and tired of being attacked for standing by a candidate who shares my values. Mr. Zakaria, your vague articles just fuel the uneducated ignorance that has insulted my beliefs in capitalism and free market. I strongly urge you to stop misleading the American people and resign on their behalf.

    Sincerely,
    Dylan

    • Posted By: epryor @ 10/22/2008 2:50:40 PM

      I strongly disagree with some of your statements. Obama, while in the U.S. senate has sponsored over 579 bills. Some of the ones that have passed (through a majority Repubilcan Senate and House) include the Obama/Feingold 2007 Ethics Reform Law and laws that keep nuclear arms out of the hands of terrorists. These were major pieces of legislation in which he walked across the aisle and worked with Chuck Hagel and Richard Lugar. He also sponsored the Homes for Heroes Act and SAVE Act. Don't mention the 820 bills he sponsored in the state senate in which he sponsored numerous bipartisan bills that passed.
      No one disagreed that the surge would provide security in Bagdad. The purpose of the surge was for political reconciliation between Sunni and Shia Muslims. Although our troops brought security, there was no reconciliation. In fact, the Iraqi legislature took a 3 month recess while our soldiers were fighting and dying. That just pissed me off! The only reason that it worked is because of the Sunni Awakening movement. If that movement falls apart there will be chaos in Iraq and our soldiers will be caught in the middle of it. The surge did not work because there was almost no reconciliation. The only reason some is occuring now is because we may leave them. Sen Obama does not oppose a surge in Afganistan, in fact he recommends 2-3 combat brigades be sent there. The Afganistan war has major security implications for our country. The Taliban and Al-Queda may topple the Pakistani government. If they do, then they might have access to nuclear arms and aim them at us and Isreal. Winning in Afganistan is much more important than winning Iraq. I am not even sure you can truly win an insurgency. They do not wear uniforms, so you don't know who to kill. Our Soldiers become sitting ducks because they do have uniforms, they do have bases. In other words, this is not a conventional war where you can claim victory by wiping out your enemy because you don't know where the enemy is. In fact, you shoud fight terrorism with the police with army backup if needed, but not just with an army. When we leave now or 100 years from now, the insurgency will come back. Democracy does not work for everyone.
      On tax policy, the present tax cuts unfairly give the rich deep tax cuts, while increasing the tax burden to the middle class. So Republicans take your money and give it to someone richer than you. I would rather the democrats give it to someone who is struggling, than the fat cats on Wall Street anyday. There has been a trend in this country where the rich are increasing their salaries, while the middle class and poor salaries remain stagnant. I don't mind using taxes to offset this. When the middle class does good that is good for everyone. It seems that when you take money away from the middle class and poor and give it to the rich it is called capitalism, but if you give it to the poor and middle class it is called socialism.

      • Posted By: big_4 @ 10/22/2008 9:46:09 PM

        You know, I agree with a lot of the things that you said to an extent. There is no legislation that you can pass, including the Nunn-Lugar Acts,that would keep nuclear weapons out ot the hands of terrorists--our legslative jurisdiction does not extend to our enemies.

        But I still hold to the fact that he has no record of truely making any "change." I will admit that I did short change his legislative accomplishments in my previous comment, but the way he has voted has been consistently liberal and partisan. And the act regarding the Dem. Rep. Of The Congo remains the only large bill that President Bush has singed into action.

        John McCain, on the other hand, has over the years been pushing for change. He reformed airport security laws. He created the 9/11 cdommission. He pushed for regulation of Fannie and Freddie. He HAS broken ranks with his party, at times, quite angrily. That is what we need right now--someone who rule from the center, not the far left.

        • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:50:23 PM

          Obama isn't "far left". Obama is a liberal but guess what? It's not a bad word anymore. Too bad for you.

          • Posted By: big_4 @ 10/23/2008 5:52:21 PM

            ? Obama is far left. When I talk about delusion, this is what I am referring to.

            http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/03/fact-check-does-obama-almost-always-vote-with-his-party/

            how does tht make you feel dumbass?

  • Posted By: patienttype @ 10/22/2008 3:05:57 AM

    In the most recent Newsweek Mr. Zakaria wrote a lengthy article about the economic crisis. He concludes that the last thing the economy needs are tax cuts for individual taxpayers. Yet, every time Obama speaks in public he promises 95 percent of the public a tax reduction.
    What is in the water? Mr. Zakaria is normally an astute observer. Now he and millions of Americans are ready to select an untested junior senator as president of the United States. Obama speaks well and reads a teleprompter with much greater skill than Senator McCain.
    Is everyone, Zakaria included, simply star struck?

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:44:42 PM

      Just ask Colin Powell. He had the most complete and cogent explanation of why Obama is the better choice that I've seen.

  • Posted By: patienttype @ 10/22/2008 3:14:21 AM

    Zakaria and much of America is lurching toward electing a junior senator with no significant credentials or accomplishments as president of the United States.
    Yes, Obama reads a teleprompter better than McCain and is a better public speaker...
    Without a record to assess Mr. Obama's abilities, we're relying on debates about health plans and tax plans that will never exist in reality and who has the best sound bites as a basis to choose the leader of our nation.
    I have no idea what has Zakaria, much of the media, and millions of American's so star struck.
    I'm concerned about the judgement of American voters. FIrst they elect and re elect George Bush, a night mare from the take no prisoners, far right wing of the Republican Party. Now they're veering toward a very far left Democrat. Can't we elect a qualified centrist? No wonder our standing in the world is diminishing.

    • Posted By: epryor @ 10/22/2008 12:34:49 PM

      I strongly disagree with some of your statements. Obama is qualified. He graduated from Columbia in political science and from Harvard law school, where he graduated in the top 10% of his class. He spent 10 years in the Illinois Senate and also as a Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago. Obama, while in the U.S. senate has sponsored over 579 bills. Some of the ones that have passed (through a majority Repubilcan Senate and House) include the Obama/Feingold 2007 Ethics Reform Law and laws that keep nuclear arms out of the hands of terrorists. These were major pieces of legislation in which he walked across the aisle and worked with Chuck Hagel and Richard Lugar. He also sponsored the Homes for Heroes Act and SAVE Act. Don't mention the 820 bills he sponsored in the state senate in which he sponsored numerous bipartisan bills that passed.

      • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:43:36 PM

        Yeah. The inexperienced canard didn't work for Hillary and it's not working for McCain. It might have had more bite if McCain hadn't nominated an airhead for VP.

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/22/2008 8:51:41 AM

    What Bin Ladin, Putin, Ahmadinejad, and others know from history, and Biden admits will be quickly tested if Obama wins:

    Cuba, Vietnam. Laos, Cambodia, Iran, Nicaragua, Somalia, Iraq. Let our friends, allies and the innocents die, by the millions if necessary. Just so long as they are not Americans. We are the Democratic Party, and for 50 years, from the Bay of Pigs to the Basra Highway and beyond, we have never met a fight we could not pressure our government to run away from, or friends and allies we could not abandon. It's the story of our generation. Only the French are more defeatist than we, but together America, we can change that and become number one. And its change we can believe in. Come on America, and vote Democrat. Together, we can re-live that pride we haven't felt since the 1970's. If we just blindly pull together, we really can make this like it is Jimmy Carter's lost second term. Yes we can!

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:42:20 PM

      Boring...do you even have a job? I guess copy and paste doesn't really take much time. Thankfully, your nonsense is easily dismissed by rational folks.

    • Posted By: sirhc @ 10/22/2008 10:17:18 AM

      WHAT YOU ARE SAYING WOULD BE TRUE IF.........

      1. AL QUEDA DID NOT JUST SUPPORTED JOHN MCCAIN. TO A POINT WHERE THEY ARE SAYING THEY WILL BOMB US BECAUSE THAT WILL GET MCCAIN ELECTED. THESE PEOPLE ARE EVIL BUT THEY'RE NOT IDIOTS. 15 OF THEM WITH BOX CUTTERS BROUGHT THIS COUNTRY TO IT'S KNEES. THEY KNOW A WEAK ECONOMY IS DESTROYING US AND MCCAIN WILL CONTINUE IT. THEY KNOW WE WERE IDIOTS FOR TAKING OUR EYES OFF THE BALL AND INVADING IRAQ SO NOW WE ARE SPREAD TO THIN. THE 1 CANDIDATE WHO IS MORE LIKELY TO DO THAT-JOHN MCCAIN. THEY JUST EXPLAINED IT ALMOST EXACTLY HOW I JUST DID.

      2. IF OSAMA BIN LADEN WASN'T STILL ALIVE TALKING TRASH. ON REPUBLICAN WATCH(WHITEHOUSE, CONGRESS AND EVEN SUPREME COURT) WE HAD A MAN KILL 3000+ AMERICANS, ON AMERICAN SOIL, IN ONE DAY. HE IS STILL ALIVE 7 YEARS LATER??!!! IF SOMEONE WOULD'VE TOLD YOU THAT IN 1999 YOU WOULD LAUGH AT THEM. BARACK IS THE ONLY ONE WHO SAID WE SHOULD GO AFTER BIN LADEN IN PAKISTAN AND WHAT HE GET FROM REPUBLICANS? "PAKISTAN IS OUR FRIEND, HE'S CLUELESS!" THEY ARE FRIENDS LIKE YOUR BEST FRIEND SLEEPING WITH YOUR WIFE. WITH FRIENDS LIKE THAT WHO NEEDS ENEMIES?

  • Posted By: BrotherB @ 10/22/2008 4:27:21 PM

    Only seven months until my subscription to Obamaweek is finished. This once-proud publication has shamed itself this election season. Should BHO be elected I wonder how Obamaweek will cover his administration? I will have to read about it in The Economist.

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:40:12 PM

      Snore. When the facts aren't on your side, you cry bias. Want some cheese with your whine?

  • Posted By: krohn2 @ 10/22/2008 5:06:16 PM

    FactCheck.Org is owned by the Annenberg group of Chicago! Talk about a conflict of interest! And Obama has been telling people on the trail to check out the site to verify his opponents claims. Funny, every time that he endorsed something, it turns out to be a part of his spin machine! Like he raised objections in the primaries when Indiana required photo I.D. to vote. He Protested that It took away people's right to vote! I
    knew then and there that he was up to no good! America, wake up from the MASS HYPNOSIS!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWTs1YyhFRg&feature=related

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:39:00 PM

      Annenberg's widow is a supporter of McCain. 'Nuff said.

    • Posted By: epryor @ 10/22/2008 7:21:46 PM

      That is not a conflict of interest. It's the truth and verified by more than just Factcheck.

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/22/2008 7:06:01 PM



    Who "Joe the plumber" may be is not the issue, though it's easy to see why the Dems want it to be. That's because the real issue is what Obama's comments to him revealed about Obama. In the exchange with "Joe the plumber" we find out that Obama really is as radical as his early political acquaintances, Davis, Ayers, Wright, etc., and that he is into the failed economic policy of wealth redistribution. Obama's tax and spending plans alone would be bad enough, but add Reid and Pelosi to the mix, with the three of them controlling both houses of Congress and the executive branch without any effective restraint, and you have something that should causes concern even among moderate Democrats.
    See Wall Street Journal: A Liberal Supermajority:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html

    And whether McCain won or lost the third debate is also not relevant. He succeeded in the first half hour to plant the seeds of a Reagan style wipeout. Reputable historians and economists overwhelmingly agree that the taxation imposed by Hoover and FDR, and the "stimulus" spending and public works programs of FDR, actually deepened and prolonged the Great Depression. It was the production demands of WWII that got the economy going again. And when the war was over, the economy promptly went into recession.

    See e.g. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/03/opinion/main4499465.shtml
    And
    http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx

    Point is, Obama's programs require him to tax, and his health care plan is a hidden tax on all business, large an small. In reality, it does not really matter who he taxes, those taxes are going to be passed through the economy. He has to tax, because it is they only way he can pay for his massive social engineering experiments. Any first year economics student knows that taxation is a tool used to contract an economy experiencing inflation, because it reduces demand by reducing the amount of money individuals and businesses have to spend. It is contractionary, which is exactly what you do not want to do when the problem is that the economy is contracting already into recession. Like Hoover and FDR, Obama's plans will only make it worse for longer.

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:37:47 PM

      Wow, your ability to copy and paste is sexy.

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/22/2008 7:06:11 PM

    See: http://www.newsweek.com/id/164972
    Stating that Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act wasn't what caused the meltdown, and noting that "economists on both sides of the political spectrum have suggested that the act has probably made the crisis less severe than it might otherwise have been." And also:
    http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/who_caused_the_economic_crisis.html
    Look and listen for yourself. Hear Obama in his own words discusses his links to both ACORN and the mortgage meltdown, and praises bundling and securitizing mortgages by banks as a means to float loans to the poor and spread the risk world wide. Never mind the link commentators point of view, just listen to what Obama says in his own words. A picture is worth a thousand words. Maybe more in the case of Obama comments in the last half of the first youtube link.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vJcVgJhNaU

    See also:
    http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?threadid=808692&boardsparam=Page%3d2

    Below is a link to C-SPAN video clips of the Congressional hearings at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix Fannie and Freddie. See for yourself who said what.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
    See also
    http://www.newsweek.com/id/164732 from this web site. (oops!) stating that Freddie Mac was spending tax payer money to target Republicans in 2005 who were trying to regulate Fannie and Freddies fraud. Democrats were not targeted, as the were all in the tank with Fannie and Freddie to kill the regulations. Hear that, the article admits that Republicans were trying to regulate, and Democrats were trying to stop it from happening as a means to facilitate the Community Reinvestment Act.

    The link below contains a purported list of the top 25 in Congress who got contributions from the folks at Fannie and Freddie. Obama is listed third, after Dodd and Kerry, even though Obama is just a junior Senator. Obama is followed next by Clinton. Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi are on the list as well.

    http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=16&artnum=1&issue=20080918

    And the link below describes how some Democrats in Congress tried to use the original version of the bailout bill to divert money eventually recovered to groups like ACORN, a group Obama has a long association with. See: Wall Street Journal

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122247015469280723.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:37:09 PM

      It's the deregulation, stupid.

  • Posted By: conservativevalues1 @ 10/23/2008 1:53:06 AM

    Let me make this as pithy as a I can:

    cut taxes / cut spending / KILL TERRORISTS = John McCain

    raise taxes / increase spending / NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS - Barry Obama

    Now choose wisely....

    Conservativevalues1

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:35:37 PM

      Let Obama languish in comfort in Pakistan = John McCain

      Send in troops to kill Bin Laden = Barack Obama

    • Posted By: Unbridled Truth @ 10/23/2008 2:25:52 AM

      Who is Barry Obama?

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/23/2008 8:58:01 AM

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27324419/

    AP poll: Candidates running nearly even 10/22/08

    Neck-and-neck results are a departure from many recent national polls
    WASHINGTON - The presidential race tightened after the final debate, with John McCain gaining among whites and people earning less than $50,000, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll that shows McCain and Barack Obama essentially running even among likely voters in the election homestretch.

    The poll, which found Obama at 44 percent and McCain at 43 percent, supports what some Republicans and Democrats privately have said in recent days: that the race narrowed after the third debate as Republican-leaning voters drifted home to their party.

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:34:38 PM

      The AP poll oversampled fundies. The average of reputable polls still have Obama up by high single digits or more.

  • Posted By: josemarti @ 10/23/2008 9:35:16 AM

    We have a clear choice before us. A hero or a zero. An American citizen or a "citizen of the world." Greatness or grandiosity. I have always been proud of my country or "I had never been proud of my country." Opportunity or redistribution. Americans are the most decent people on this earth or Americans are "bitter and cling to religion." God Bless America or "God Damn America." Americans know best or I know best. Truth or political correctness. We have a clear choice. How will you choose?

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:32:56 PM

      Old vs. young. Top of his class vs. near the bottom. Even tempered vs. erratic. Tax cuts for ordinary Americans vs. tax cuts for the extremely wealthy. Pro-choice vs. anti-choice. Hope vs. fear.

      Obama-Biden '08

  • Posted By: jenny25000 @ 10/23/2008 9:35:36 AM

    BARACK OBAMA IS JUST TELLING YOU WHAT WE WANT TO HEAR.... THAT'S ALL

    • Posted By: Johnsonium @ 10/23/2008 4:30:52 PM

      And what we want to hear is change. It's about time a candidate pays attention to what the constituents want.

  • Posted By: DianaRo @ 10/23/2008 4:24:54 PM

    "The Borgen Project has some good info on the cost of addressing global poverty.
    $30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.
    $540 billion: Annual U.S. Defense Budget."

  • Posted By: TruthForward @ 10/23/2008 2:08:05 PM

    Taxes:

    -Those making between $250,000 and $400,000 annually will have less than $1,500 increase in their taxes. (These people are not complaining. Joe is not one of these people.)

    -Those making more than $3 Million annually will pay only 23%.

    This will PAY FOR the tax cuts given to the middle class.
    This WILL NOT INCREASE THE DEFICIT!

    Calculate your taxcut: http://taxcut.barackobama.com/

    ...................

    McCain has a Santa Clause approach to tax cutting. He wants to make cuts, but has not identified how it will be paid for. This will never pass Congress.

    McCAIN'S TAX PLAN (or slogan) WILL WILL INCREASE THE DEFICIT!

    Get your specific McCain Tax info (if available)
    http://www.johnmccain.com/Issues/JobsforAmerica/taxes.htm
    McCain has slogans not plans.

  • Posted By: joeblow11 @ 10/23/2008 12:01:27 PM

    I'm sorry, but you're not a "maverick" if you've never held a job in the private sector and have spent the last 30 years warming a mahogany chair in an office paid for by Joe the Plumber. The only people that can be compared to are the old elites of the Communist party of the former USSR, who also whittled at self-congradulatory careers at the people's expense. You don't call them "mavericks"; they are called "Communists". John McCain has had his hand out to the taxpayer his entire life, yet Obama, a man who came from little and by his own effort (not his dad's or granddad's legacy) rose to the top, is called a "socialist". Get over yourself, John, you have been a leech on the ass of the country your entire life and it's time to tear you off.

  • Posted By: joeblow11 @ 10/23/2008 11:59:12 AM

    I'm sorry, but you're not a "maverick" if you've never held a job in the private sector and have spent the last 30 years warming a mahogany chair in an office paid for by Joe the Plumber. The only people that can be compared to are the old elites of the Communist party of the former USSR, who also whittled at self-congradulatory careers at the people's expense. You don't call them "mavericks"; they are called "Communists". John McCain has had his hand out to the taxpayer his entire life, yet Obama, a man who came from little and by his own effort (not his dad's or granddad's legacy) rose to the top, is called a "socialist". Get over yourself, John, you have been a leech on the ass of the country your entire life and it's time to tear you off.

  • Posted By: Richard_40 @ 10/21/2008 12:45:27 PM

    John McCain will do nothing with foriegn leaders what so ever. He will have a bunker mentality just like Bush. McCain just wants to warm a seat with his ass in oval office. If he is elected he will be a lame duck President just like Bush with an all democrat congress. Vote Barack Obama for the change we need. Vote Obama for new ideas this country needs. Obama has shown leadership to take on world leaders when crisis arise. The polls aren't moving for McCain, I believe the country has made it's mind up who will be the next President of the United States. Barack Obama. 13 days to go.

    • Posted By: crave @ 10/21/2008 2:04:17 PM

      Obama will do plenty with other country's. We will be living like them if he gets elected. Where do you think he got his money for school and traveling, he was not working back then and he sure did NOT have any student loans. Wake up, look to where he is getting his money from. Maybe you should move to an Arab country.
      God Bless America

      • Posted By: kshortSD @ 10/21/2008 3:27:40 PM

        Do you really think that McCain is somehow more "American" than Obama? If starting wars for false reasons, destroying our economy for fear of regulation, and legalizing discrimination are "American" values in your opinion, then I'm scared. The ignorant fools who voted for Bush TWICE and are panicking that McCain is going to lose need to accept the fact that THINGS NEED TO CHANGE. Bush's administration was the worst in the history of this country, and you better get over the fact that most voters aren't going to let it happen again.

        • Posted By: Unbridled Truth @ 10/23/2008 1:46:16 AM

          I am scared too. I am a first generation American. My grandfather is one of the people responsible for creating the war technology used to defeat Hitler. He emigrated to this country and brought the family over 58 years ago. My family entered this country legally and I was born an American. My father was a child during world war II and he lived with the reality of Hitler's bombs falling on his homeland. Both of my grandparents lost family to WWI. When my grandfather emigrated to this country, it was because he believed in the American Dream. I thank God that he is not alive today to see what has become of this country. I thank God that he is not alive today to see what the Bush Administration and Republican Corruption and Greed has done to this county and to his family. I grew up on 30 Acres of land. My father's favorite toy was his airplane. I learned how to fly an airplane before I leaned how to drive a car. I have more education than my father and I make less money than I did 8 years ago. According to the American Propaganda .... I should be living better than my father, but I am not. He is in his 70's today, and because the economy has become so bad .... he is still working. And I am no fool. I understand if things continue as they have for the past 8 years, I will never retire ..... and despite my upbringing, I never had the fund to own an airplane. Truth is, I'd rather have a boat, but our upper middle class family has been reduced to the working poor -- thanks to the Republican Rule.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse