The First Disaster Of The Internet Age

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

At the same time, in making information free, the Internet has buried us in data, keeping most people from seeing the building credit storm. Rather than turning the world into a global village of empowered investors, the resulting data fog helped some Wall Street wiseguys hijack the global economy as easily as playing videogames—with instant messages and trillions of dollars in complex derivatives.

The dotcom crash of 2000 and 2001 may have involved Internet stocks, but the underlying cause was old-fashioned "irrational exuberance" (at least Green-span got that one right). It was a kind of adolescence period for the Internet. Now, by contrast, we are in the midst of the first financial crisis of the mature Internet age—a crisis caused in large part by the tightly coupled technologies that now undergird the financial system and our society as a whole.

The fiasco raises important questions about how to regulate financial markets. If information is freely available, does that mean the onus is no longer on Wall Streeters to tell the rest of us what's going on? What role do regulators play in keeping tabs on all these complex financial shenanigans?

The Internet has made it possible for anybody with an online brokerage account and a broadband connection to become a global investor, but with that freedom has come a great responsibility: to know what you're doing without relying on government oversight. And in a world where our ability to trade exotic financial instruments vastly exceeds our ability to understand and value them, that is a very dangerous thing indeed. It behooves us to pause and take a look at the forces that led us here, and what we might do to prevent another occurrence.

The information was out there, and this problem had been building for years, so why did no one notice? Part of the problem is that the relevant data, while available on the Web, is spread around in a zillion places. You can go to Yahoo Finance to check the recent share price of Wal-Mart, its market capitalization and its current sales. There is no one free place where you can do the same thing across subprime mortgages, asset-backed securities, credit swaps and all the other arcana inherent in taking the temperature of modern global markets. Instead, you have to wander from site to site, sort of like building a jigsaw puzzle from disguised pieces strewn around an entire city. It is part treasure hunt and part puzzle-building.

That's not the end of the problems. Information about financial time bombs, like derivatives, is veiled in acronyms that make you want to gouge your eyes out. (Consider two different measures of the performance of mortgage securities: ABX.HE.AA.06-2 and ABX.HE.AA.06-1—such lovely and lyrical names!) There is an entire language required to understand this new generation of financial technologies, from credit default swaps to collateralized debt obligations to residential mortgage-backed securities, not to mention the corresponding three- and four-letter abbreviations. There's also data on current account deficits and yield spreads. Most people, faced with this tsunami of data, do the only rational thing: they give up.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
NEWSWEEK's 20/10
NEWSWEEK's 20/10

Our decade-in-review project recalls the highs and lows of the last 10 years.

Obama's Promises
Obama's Promises

Is the new president fulfilling his campaign pledges? Or falling short?

The Decade in 7 Minutes
The Decade in 7 Minutes

Video: A fast-paced review of the best and worst moments. Don't blink.

Accidental Celebrities
Accidental Celebrities

From Levi Johnston to Elian Gonzalez, these people never expected to be in the spotlight.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: koppany varga @ 12/06/2008 12:30:42 PM

    http://koppanyvarga.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/financial-system-fix-it-with-empowering/


    How to fix the financial system by introducing radical openness?

    Poor Alan Greenspan - he seems to be the dumbest person on the planet. To trust that the Internet would make the financial markets safer and more transparent? What a naïve idea!

    Yet, he is right. The Internet is capable to make the world safer. It can bring more transparency, but can't chase away the shadow of secrets alone. And that is exactly why he is wrong trusting the Internet to do the job alone.

    However, strengthening the regulatory structure, introducing tons of new legislation, setting up new monitoring agencies is the wrong answer to our problems. It does nothing more than slowing the economy even more down.

    Is there a way out?
    Yes, and Paul Kedrosky is very close in this article. He suggests, we should have some more light on the scene. We need a financial dashboard, and access to the IMs between the traders. That is right. But we need much more.


    Radical openness

    What we really need is wiping out alltogether the secrets in the financial system. You can not build a healthy industry on secrets. It only helps to hide incompetency, hybris and greed.

    So what next?

    Obligate the financial service providers to make ALL relevant information generally available, real-time. Things like the IMs (even better: send them on twitter); all data they give to rating firms, auditors and state agencies; minutes of board meetings (even broadcast them online); all background studies and calculations.

    While legislation takes some time, this policy can be introduced instantly at companies bailed out.

    This would lower the barriers of entry into the industry of analyzing and rating financial products. Empowering startups to proliferate in this field will - in turn - change the behaviour also the incumbent players. And this would reinstate trust and sincerity in the financial system. Funny words? Yes, and this one shows again, how ill our system really is in its present form.

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/27/2008 9:16:24 AM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

    Hear Obama in 2001 Chicago Public Citizen Radio Interview criticizing the Warren Court as not radical enough for not pursuing redistribution of wealth.

    Obama Says that community organizing is for the purpose of assembling the political power to force redistribution of wealth.

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/26/2008 9:39:35 PM

    The Kennedy tax cut.

    http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1765.cfm

    About half way through the article.

    "President Kennedy proposed massive tax-rate reductions, which were passed by Congress and became law after he was assassinated. The 1964 tax cut reduced the top marginal personal income tax rate from 91 percent to 70 percent by 1965. The cut reduced lower-bracket rates as well. In the four years prior to the 1965 tax-rate cuts, federal government income tax revenue--adjusted for inflation--increased at an average annual rate of 2.1 percent, while total government income tax revenue (federal plus state and local) increased by 2.6 percent per year . In the four years following the tax cut, federal government income tax revenue increased by 8.6 percent annually and total government income tax revenue increased by 9.0 percent annually. Government income tax revenue not only increased in the years following the tax cut, it increased at a much faster rate.
    The Kennedy tax cut set the example that President Ronald Reagan would follow some 17 years later. By increasing incentives to work, produce, and invest, real GDP growth increased in the years following the tax cuts: More people worked, and the tax base expanded. Additionally, the expenditure side of the budget benefited as well because the unemployment rate was significantly reduced.
    Using the Congressional Budget Office's revenue forecasts (made with the full knowledge of the future tax cuts), revenues came in much higher than had been anticipated, even after the "cost""of the tax cut had been taken into account. Additionally, in 1965--one year following the tax cut--personal income tax revenue data exceeded expectations by the greatest amounts in the highest income classes.
    Testifying before Congress in 1977, Walter Heller, President Kenned''s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, summarized:
    What happened to the tax cut in 1965 is difficult to pin down, but insofar as we are able to isolate it, it did seem to have a tremendously stimulative effect, a multiplied effect on the economy. It was the major factor that led to our running a $3 billion surplus by the middle of 1965 before escalation in Vietnam struck us. It was a $12 billion tax cut, which would be about $33 or $34 billion in today's terms, and within one year the revenues into the Federal Treasury were already above what they had been before the tax cut.
    Did the tax cut pay for itself in increased revenues? I think the evidence is very strong that it did."

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 
PHOTOS
What About Us?
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.