The Bin Laden Factor

Amazing, that this article covers every conceivable eventuality but the most obvious game changer of all. Bin Laden is caught or killed between now and the election. Better yet ............ the military has already caught Bin Laden and has him stashed somewhere. Bush flies in, and is filmed killing BL in hand to hand fight. He turns to the camera and says ..... "that's for the American people, and for the next president of the United States, John McCain." Bush redeems his entire 8 years and hands the torch to the next Republican president and says "finish the job for me John."

Palin all excited about being 'in charge' of the senate. Plans on initiating a loyalty check to see what senators need firing.

McCain said clearly about Bin Laden: I KNOW HOW TO GET HIM.

If he really knows, how come he has NOT told Bush and the rest of this country?

If he knows, it is despicable that he is keeping it to himself.

If he does NOT know, then IT IS A BALD FACE LIE to simply pander for votes.

Is this what McCain calls putting country first? Or is this just putting John McCain first?

Another question. Since I vote Democratic and don't live in one of Palin's 'pro-American' parts of the country, do i have to take down my American flag?

If I contribute the maximum of $2,300 to the McCain ticket, then Sarah can buy a new pair of shoes. Where do i sign up?

I'd like to see coverage of this.

Obama's membership within the 'New Party' is disturbing as even Green Party members attacked the DSA and New Party as nothing more than a fringe group. The New Party had hoped to implement Socialist Rule in the United States and was established to counteract the influence of a Democratic Party that they viewed as too moderate and too centered. Now it seems that nearly 10 years after the socialist party fell apart, their strategy of upward growth has reached the White House. Obama's ties to the DSA's New Party is beyond just an association it is outright membership, as clearly defined by the parties August 1996 newsletter, in an outright Socialist organization.

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2008/10/senator-obama-signed-contract-with.html

See: http://www.newsweek.com/id/164972
Stating that Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act wasn't what caused the meltdown, and noting that "economists on both sides of the political spectrum have suggested that the act has probably made the crisis less severe than it might otherwise have been." And also:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/who_caused_the_economic_crisis.html
Look and listen for yourself. Hear Obama in his own words discusses his links to both ACORN and the mortgage meltdown, and praises bundling and securitizing mortgages by banks as a means to float loans to the poor and spread the risk world wide. Never mind the link commentators point of view, just listen to what Obama says in his own words. A picture is worth a thousand words. Maybe more in the case of Obama comments in the last half of the first youtube link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vJcVgJhNaU

See also:
http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?threadid=808692&boardsparam=Page%3d2

Below is a link to C-SPAN video clips of the Congressional hearings at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix Fannie and Freddie. See for yourself who said what.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
See also
http://www.newsweek.com/id/164732 from this web site. (oops!) stating that Freddie Mac was spending tax payer money to target Republicans in 2005 who were trying to regulate Fannie and Freddies fraud. Democrats were not targeted, as the were all in the tank with Fannie and Freddie to kill the regulations. Hear that, the article admits that Republicans were trying to regulate, and Democrats were trying to stop it from happening as a means to facilitate the Community Reinvestment Act.

The link below contains a purported list of the top 25 in Congress who got contributions from the folks at Fannie and Freddie. Obama is listed third, after Dodd and Kerry, even though Obama is just a junior Senator. Obama is followed next by Clinton. Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi are on the list as well.

http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=16&artnum=1&issue=20080918

And the link below describes how some Democrats in Congress tried to use the original version of the bailout bill to divert money eventually recovered to groups like ACORN, a group Obama has a long association with. See: Wall Street Journal

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122247015469280723.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Who "Joe the plumber" may be is not the issue, though it's easy to see why the Dems want it to be. That's because the real issue is what Obama's comments to him revealed about Obama. In the exchange with "Joe the plumber" we find out that Obama really is as radical as his early political acquaintances, Davis, Ayers, Wright, etc., and that he is into the failed economic policy of wealth redistribution. Obama's tax and spending plans alone would be bad enough, but add Reid and Pelosi to the mix, with the three of them controlling both houses of Congress and the executive branch without any effective restraint, and you have something that should causes concern even among moderate Democrats.
See Wall Street Journal: A Liberal Supermajority:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html

And whether McCain won or lost the third debate is also not relevant. He succeeded in the first half hour to plant the seeds of a Reagan style wipeout. Reputable historians and economists overwhelmingly agree that the taxation imposed by Hoover and FDR, and the "stimulus" spending and public works programs of FDR, actually deepened and prolonged the Great Depression. It was the production demands of WWII that got the economy going again. And when the war was over, the economy promptly went into recession.

See e.g. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/03/opinion/main4499465.shtml
And
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx

Point is, Obama's programs require him to tax, and his health care plan is a hidden tax on all business, large an small. In reality, it does not really matter who he taxes, those taxes are going to be passed through the economy. He has to tax, because it is they only way he can pay for his massive social engineering experiments. Any first year economics student knows that taxation is a tool used to contract an economy experiencing inflation, because it reduces demand by reducing the amount of money individuals and businesses have to spend. It is contractionary, which is exactly what you do not want to do when the problem is that the economy is contracting already into recession. Like Hoover and FDR, Obama's plans will only make it worse for longer.

October 22, 2008
National Tracking Polls
Posted by KYLE TRYGSTAD | E-Mail This | Permalink | Email Author
This is where the national daily tracking polls stand as of today:

Rasmussen: Obama 51 (+1), McCain 45 (-1)
Hotline/FD: Obama 47 (nc), McCain 42 (+1)
GWU/Battleground: Obama 49 (+1), McCain 47 (nc)
Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby: Obama 52 (+2), McCain 42 (nc)
ABC News/Wash. Post: Obama 54 (+1), McCain 43 (-1)
IBD/TIPP: Obama 46 (-1), McCain 42 (+1)
Gallup (Expanded LV model*): Obama 52 (nc), McCain 44 (+2)
Gallup (Traditional LV model*): Obama 50 (-1), McCain 45 (+1)
(change since yesterday)

*Gallup's "Traditional" and "Expanded" Likely Voter models are weighted at 50%, so that the survey only counts once in the RCP National Average.

Obama leads by 7.0 points in the RCP National Average

Electoral Map
John McCain 157 / Barack Obama 286 / Toss-up 95

I love this country!!!!!! What a great time to be an American!!!!!!

Surely it's time to stop perpetrating this nonsense about the Spanish 2004 elections. The reason the Socialists won is that a large number of Spanish voters overturned the likely outcome of the election because the conservative Popular Party were caught out in a blatant lie. For their own electoral purposes they insisted during the three days leading up to the election that the outrage was committed by the Basque terrorist group ETA, not by an Islamist terror group. The voters threw out the Popular Party for attempting to manipulate the election. A perceptive electorate and, perhaps, a lesson for any Americans who are interested in the truth.

Surely it's time to stop perpetrating this nonsense about the Spanish 2004 elections. The reason the Socialists won is that a large number of Spanish voters overturned the likely outcome of the election because the conservative Popular Party were caught out in a blatant lie. For their own electoral purposes they insisted during the three days leading up to the election that the outrage was committed by the Basque terrorist group ETA. This was untrue and they were duly punished at the polls. A lesso, hopefully, for the Americans.

JJ, Barcelona

Hello fellow Americans. "C'mon people now, smile on your brother everybody get together try to love one another right now." Awwwww if only we could try but thanks to Karl Rove and his separate and defeat tactics we'll never pass that way again. Bin Laden??? JOHN if you know how to get him would you please tell the president or is it nanny nanny boo boo I'm not telling you unless you vote for me.

It is surprising that you actually believe that there is still a terrorist out there who will attack the U.S. Isn't it safe to say that after eight years of killing anything that moves in the Middle East, that most so-called terrorists are dead if not busy.