A World of Hurt

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

However, some experts believe there are differences that may keep overseas markets from falling quite as far as Americans' home values. While countries like the U.K. did experience some subprime lending, the practice of giving mortgages to less credit-worthy buyers never reached the proportions overseas as it did in the United States. That means other countries likely won't experience the level of foreclosures that America has seen. And while European countries did experience a building boom as home prices shot up during the early 2000s, no country went as wild over new houses and condos as America did. As a result, overseas markets aren't suffering the vast glut of never-lived-in houses sitting vacant on the market, which is making it hard to sell existing homes in many U.S. markets.

That doesn't mean that overseas real-estate markets are insulated from a painful price decline, however. Howard Archer, chief U.K and Eurozone economist at Global Insight, predicts that home prices in the U.K. will fall 16 percent in 2008 and another 15 percent next year. Home prices there won't bottom out until late 2010, Archer says, and when they do, they'll be 33 percent below the peak they reached in mid-2007.

Indeed, for all the talk about the unprecedented nature of the U.S. housing meltdown, when experts like Loungani look at the numbers in the context of global housing cycles, our recent experience seems slightly less remarkable. Loungani says that based on the IMF's review of housing cycles going back several decades, the average country sees home prices escalate by 45 percent during booms (which last, on average, about 6 years), and then sees prices decline about 25 percent during busts, which last an average of four years. For people anxiously awaiting the bottom of this painful U.S. housing bust, those numbers may be encouraging. Says Loungani: "The U.S. is approaching the fourth year and has had cumulative declines getting close to 25 percent, [and] we're trying to make the point that based on historical experience, the U.S. should be bottoming out mid-next year."

But the IMF research also contains some unpleasant findings about the way housing busts usually ripple across economies. IMF economists looked at how recessions played out across a host of countries, and one of the things they explored was the way in which a housing bust tended to exacerbate an economic downturn, particularly when it comes to unemployment. Simply put, during recessions that coincide with housing downturn, many more people tend to find themselves without a job. With U.S. unemployment already at 6.1 percent and the economy undergoing an evident slowdown due to the credit crisis and plummeting consumer confidence, our economic pain may continue even when America's housing woes reach their nadir.

Daniel Mcginn Is A National Correspondent At Newsweek And The Author Of "House Lust: Americas Obsession With Our Homes"

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: halbhh @ 01/19/2009 12:48:19 PM

    "...based on the IMF's review of housing cycles going back several decades, the average country sees home prices escalate by 45 percent during booms (which last, on average, about 6 years), and then sees prices decline about 25 percent during busts..."

    So....since our house price rise was *more* than 45%.....

    Our bust will be more than -25%.

  • Posted By: Nowforsomemoretruth @ 11/03/2008 10:30:35 PM

    In the exchange with "Joe the plumber" Obama unintentionally revealed that he really is as radical as his early political mentors and acquaintances, Davis, Ayers, Wright, Khalidi etc., (gee, there sure seem to be a lot of them) and that he is into the failed economic policy of wealth redistribution. Now there is absolute proof. In 2001, Obama, the "community organizer" turned legislator, said in an interview:

    "And I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was that the civil rights movement became so court-focused, I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and organizing activities on the ground that are able to bring about the coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that,"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

    2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview.

    Obama's tax and spending plans alone would be bad enough, but add Reid and Pelosi to the mix, with the three of them controlling both houses of Congress and the executive branch without any effective restraint, and you have something that should causes concern even among moderate Democrats.
    See Wall Street Journal: A Liberal Supermajority:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html

    Indeed, some democrats are publically saying as much. See Barney Franks comments on the news, including face the nation last week, stating essentially that Democrats in Congress intend to greatly raise taxes and go on a spending spree.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1Mazjm_A5k

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGnSAlqjoU

    See http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/23617.html

    Obama's ill-conceived programs will require him to tax, and his health care plan alone is a substantial hidden tax on all business, large an small. In reality, it does not really matter who he taxes, those taxes are going to be passed through the economy. He has to tax, because it is they only way he can pay for his massive social engineering experiments. Any first year economics student knows that taxation is a tool used to contract an economy experiencing inflation, because it reduces demand by reducing the amount of money individuals and businesses have to spend. It is contractionary, which is exactly what you do not want to do when the problem is that the economy is contracting already into recession. Like Hoover and FDR, Obama's plans will only make it worse for longer.

    See e.g. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/03/opinion/main4499465.shtml
    And
    http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx


    The democrats failed social engineering policies in the housing market are what brought us to ruin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related
    Even Bill Clinton says so. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsynspIqAoE
    Obama and a supermajority of Democrats simply is not the change we need, nor is it change we can afford.

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/27/2008 8:18:39 AM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

    2001 Chicago Public Citizen Radio Interview criticizing the Warren Court as not radical enough for not pursuing redistribution of wealth.

    Says that community organizing is for the purpose of assembling the political power to force redistribution of wealth.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.


 
 
PHOTOS
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.