My eyes are sore from rolling, sigh. Regulation was in place ... so new regulation is the solution? So, when the next Republican adminsitration takes office, new compliant persons will again be placed at the head of regulatory agencies and the same thing will happen. It was interesting that none of the Nobelees mentioned the problem with our government - it was essentially held hostage by Frist in the Senate and Delay in the House. Our representatives didn't even have a chance to vote on practical solutions because bills that would not directly pump money into the Republican machine and supporters were never allowed to come up to vote. If we're a democracy, why does Congress have rules that disenfrancise our representatives? My third (and final) eye-rolling trajectory toward despair and hopelessness, is that all the Nobelers consider fixing the banks to save us from doom. I believe this is a cannard - wasn't economics based on commerce the opposing idea of economics based on property? There is reason to believe both premises are flawed. So why don't economists dream up new thought paradigms for economics? ... maybe they are not really thinkers but rather pols in disguise. A greater portion of the American population is much smarter today then in the past. I say we should gradually franchise the knowledge available in the general population to steer the country.









Discuss