SPONSORED BY:

Dear Mr. President

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Update: After this story was published, we received a response from a seventh Nobel-winning economist, who had been traveling and was therefore initially unable to contribute his essay.

Sir Clive W.J. Granger was awarded the Nobel Prize in 2003 for his work on economic time series. Born in Wales, he has been a professor of economics at the University of California, San Diego since 1974.
Most economic recessions can only be broken by a change in opinion or attitude by the majority of the participants such as investors, buyers, or speculators. Any major figure, particularly a president, could influence the thinking of "investors" at certain critical moments. Such a change has to involve a new idea that sounds sensible and has wide acceptance. The $700 billion bail-out proposed by Congress did not pass the simple acceptance tests, but the "British" suggestion introduced by British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is performing well and getting wide attention.

The next president could state, for example, that his administration is implementing something like the British proposal, which clearly makes some common sense [even if unclear economics] and is being introduced by several other countries. The cost is less than previous schemes and is designed to be reversible in four or five years if successful. The money is going exactly where it is most needed! Should the Brown plan be widely accepted and acted on, we will still all face a few weeks or possibly even months of uncertainty before the world's economies get back on a sound trajectory.

Concerning [worries that] government spending would be too great: it would be less than continuing the Iraq war for a few years and much less than going to war with Iran, which is so casually debated. The costs should certainly be kept watch over and publicized.

Placing funds directly into banks also sounds like a plausible proposal. If it does not work we will have to survive a few more uncomfortable weeks before another plausible idea arises.
Finally, in my opinion, the new president should concentrate his energies on getting workers back to work and strengthening inustry, once the credit markets are working well.

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Fremord @ 11/12/2008 7:44:14 AM

    The second thing I would do is to give a tax credit for health care ( in addition to the mortgage interest deduction) to anyone paying a mortgage, for so long as they continue to pay the mortgage, again, another step toward universal health care for another segment, plus gives huge incentive to NOT file bankruptcy..

    I would also defer or eliminate taxes on the interest banks earn on mortgages, so long as the interest rate was under 6%; this would encourage those predatory lenders to wise up and perhaps encourage investors to buy those mortgages at new rates

  • Posted By: Fremord @ 11/12/2008 7:06:42 AM

    What I would do: Bail out GM; HOW? implement John Mc Cain's idea; take over the GM health care costs by giving all auto workers a $10,000 health care credit and abrogating the auto co's contracts to provide such care; instant cash bail out plus a start on universal health care. something we want to do anyway.

  • Posted By: Nowforsomemoretruth @ 11/01/2008 10:34:06 PM

    The problem with Obama is a simple one. One association does not a radical make. But in Obama's case, the list of left-wing radical mentors and associates is seemingly endless, (Davis, Ayers, Wright, Khalidi , etc., etc.) with a new revelation practically every day. With that, a picture begins to emerge, and that picture is that Obama is as steeped, not in just left-wing political thought, but in radical left-wing and race ideology, to the same extent that Pat Robertson was steeped in the ideology of the radical Religious Right. I would not have voted for Pat Robertson for dog catcher, and for similar reasons, I will not vote for Obama.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
PHOTOS
What About Us?
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.