I hear that Obama is going to do an old "illusionist" trick.......He's going to pull off his mask and reveal to the nation that he is white.
I hear that Obama is going to do an old "illusionist" trick.......He's going to pull off his mask and reveal to the nation that he is white.
Senator Obama is not taking anything for granted, and neither will he take the office nor the American people for granted. His current status has been honorably and hard won. This nation is ready for CHANGE in the strongest ways, and Senator Obama has the greatest chance to encourage that bipartisan cooperation so vital to eliminating the "bi" and replacing it with nonpartisan efforts for the country.
not taking anything for granted..the fool all ready has a presidential seal sign and all ready made a presidental speach in Europe...granted I'd say thats arrogance to the millioneteh degree
Posted By: Morgan2008 @ 10/24/2008 5:21:44 AM
Comment: Apparently you don't know what independently wealthy means...it means her income this year was approximately $6 million and her assets are estimated to be approximately $100 million. She does not need to lean on anyone else unless she wants toouldn't you then consider yourself to be independently wealthy. As far as your personal experience regarding John McCain.. that's heresay to me. I don't know whether it is true or not. I happen to be quite familiar with John McCain's record in the U.S. Senate and that is what I am relying on...not your personal story. John McCain's record is superior to Barack Obama's and that is what I am relying on...not some heresay. NOBAMA!!!!! NOBAMA!!!!! NOBAMA!!!!!
Yes if count making money passively off of inherited wealth then she is independently. But, personally I tend to have more respect for people who have had to completely earn their way in life...you know the ones who start at the bottom and know what it feels like to work to the top. And with regard to your comment about my personal experience, I have nothing to gain from lying and it is unfortunate that you seem so angry as to not listen to a fellow citizen to at least consider an additional experience especially when it came to trying to have issues addressed in the state he currently represents. But like anything, that choice remains yours and that is the beauty of this being a free country.
Just what we need in the whitehouse is another rich out of touch first lady, and a VP that thinks its ok to treat her whole family to trips and 150k in clothes. The worst part is, their so out of touch, they see nothing wrong with this spending spree. I couldnt spend 150k on clothes if I tried. I cant imagine what a person buys for that kind of money!
@Morgan2008
You have got to be kidding me when you state that Cindy McCain is independently wealthy?!?! She is an heiress as in she inherited all that money from her family! In no way did she on her own earn that fortune she has. And as for ego, McCain is my Senator and he has a reputation of not seeing his constituents unless it is to his benefit. I know this first hand as I was sent to D.C specifically to represent the people of my state and he did not have time for me for a meeting at his convenience and passed me off on an aide instead. He knew I was a constituent too and a disabled one too I guess my issues despite him representing me were not important enough for his blessed ego.
Apparently you don't know what independently wealthy means...it means her income this year was approximately $6 million and her assets are estimated to be approximately $100 million. She does not need to lean on anyone else unless she wants to do so. If you get lucky enough to win $250 million in the powerball, wouldn't you then consider yourself to be independently wealthy. As far as your personal experience regarding John McCain.. that's heresay to me. I don't know whether it is true or not. I happen to be quite familiar with John McCain's record in the U.S. Senate and that is what I am relying on...not your personal story. John McCain's record is superior to Barack Obama's and that is what I am relying on...not some heresay. NOBAMA!!!!! NOBAMA!!!!! NOBAMA!!!!!
@Morgan2008
Cindy McCain is not Independently wealthy! She is an heiress....as in she inherited all that wealth from her family and did nothing on her own to earn it from scratch!
Obama is doing what he feels is right for the nation, he is vying change for the better and will do what it takes by using his money wisely and maintaining his focus in order to keep his promise to the people. McClame cannot match that. He is in a destructive mode - he believes he's still in POW position in his attempt to make Obama "vanish from the face of the earth" and he's dragging the lot of Republicans along with him in the process. McLame's strategy isn't working. He's dreaming in colour which means he is not sleeping at all because he's too busy searching in his mind as to how else he can bring on damage. His ego has cratered a humungous hole and he's going to have to climb out of it on his own. "Me First" is clearly McLame's ego motto because he is not listening to anybody who tells him he is on the wrong path of delivery. So much for his philosophy of "Country First".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_a8-YDogNN4 enough said on folks after the election
draw yer own conclusion but do V O T E
Loriw,
Don't you feel awkward and self-conscious defending an indefensible position? There is so much factual data swirling around McCain proving him to be a liar, a petulant cheat, and an angry troll. What attracts you to him? Is it his judgement and temper? Seriously.
McCain is desperate. This is his last hurrah. After this, he will start acknowledging his age, and I think he's genuinely afraid of growing old. He's stuck in the past socially and politically, and he constantly surrounds himself with the same type and age of woman.
I honestly feel bad for Cindy. She leads a loveless marriage and probably hasn't slept with her husband in years.
And so benkrapf speaks from the position of logic... Daring. In these times, very daring. And yet admirable
Behind the Fall of USA Economy:
Administration Reason
Recent months have seen a torrent of troubling economic news, and last week was no exception. The continuing sub-prime mortgage crisis pushed one of America's largest investment banks to the brink of insolvency, saved only by a government-facilitated buyout. ? This what they???re trying to imply .
Fannie and Freddie made loans for unqualified poor people (I can???t definitely buy this as a fact). But your conclusion, that this was the main reason for the subprime mortgage crisis to unfold?.
What about to Digest This
Does this policy for the Wealthy using this flaws by letting themselves to owns the 5,6,7,8,9,10,20 houses or maybe building?Since the Weathy aslo getting the most benefit in huge TAX credits,Does this Capitalism ways for the rich making money, which that demands in market when things are good, Does that contributes the phony house prices up?
This a major conclusion that caused this financial problems in first place not the poor American, that caused the subprime mortgage crisis to unfold, when you even offered them the plus with FIX the interest rate loan flat,which means very particuliarly attractive for the wealthy capitalism.
Republican capitalism does not hold to a simple math scrutiny.
By the right conscience of the Government should provides the opportunity evenly for ALL American to achive their own Dreams????
By introduce only for the FIRST TIME to be a proud homeowners?
A place they can called ???Home??? by offering them the affordable price or maybe subsidised some of the loans.Does this a ???SIN??? for the government to provides for the first timer unqualified poor American a easier loan to let them his owned home????
How many subprime mortgages are out there? I read that about 1 million people were to go through foreclosure this year. Let???s be generous and say that 2 million people will foreclosure this year due to subprime mortgage. Median price on a house is $250,000. Let???s say that it???s $2,000.00 per month mortgage payments. So, 2 million X $2,000.00 is $4 billion a month. So you are trying to say that entire world economy is collapsed because some poor people couldnt pay 4 billion a months. Bill Gates single handedly could handle this bill for a year.
Rushs and Joe???s logic does not hold the water. Give me the break for this All Republican political motivated economical lies policy.
obama states higher taxes to small business and the middle class is going to happen under his presidency.Biden states international crises under obama administration.Reverend Wright,Father Flager,William Ayres do we really need this crap? Vote McCain/Palin vote for America.
Vote for McCain and corporate socialism, you mean.
obama is surrounded by corruption,drugs,crime,terrorist and flag burning anti Americans.What ever happened to electing honesty and integrity?McCAIN IS THE CLEAR CHOICE.
For people on crack...
McCain is a traitor in his own words:
http://mycommonsensepolitics.com
Bob...:D
After the election we can all sit back an watch the video seen here first
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_a8-YDogNN4
This tells it all on the Palin / McCain reactions
Just One Man???s Opinion
People, I really don't care who you vote for, it is your choice and your right, I respect that, but by the same token you should also respect my choice, you have to give respect to get respect.
While I agree that all of this bickering between party followers must end for the greater good, you should know a few things about the candidate you choose, after all, they are going to govern all of us for the next four years.
Know this; I am sure you have seen it yourselves. A great number of people, especially the candidates, are doing and saying some of the same things seemingly oblivious to what all of this is doing to this country and how it makes this country look to all others.
Other nations are watching this election almost, if not closer, than we ourselves apparently are. Do some actual research before choosing and then vote for your guy or gal, but don't force that choice onto others.
Some of us are making a mockery of our election system and everything it stands for. Some of us don't seem to understand that when we support those who only seek to divide us in order to gain a monetary profit, we are voting for and supporting people who care nothing about this country, let alone any of us.
Some of us just don't get it at all, if John McCain was to win this election, America would truly lose in more ways than anyone can now imagine, because we would simply be giving power right back to those who have only abused it against all of us for the past eight years.
Some of us just don't understand that a John McCain win will send a clear message to those who believe that prosperity should only be a right of the top 5% of this nation and that they have an additional right to get richer at the expense of the remaining 95% of this country.
Some of us don't understand that the 95% of this nation getting screwed are sick of it and are doing all that they can to prevent its continuation. Some of us don't seem to actually get the results of the last eight years of Republican rule or what that rule has done to this country internally and externally.
Just look around you; is anybody you know better off than they were eight years ago? Are you? Is the country?
With our economy in shambles, people losing their homes, most of our jobs sent elsewhere in the world and with this nation no longer respected globally by any nation, when are we all going to say ENOUGH? If not right now, when?
No, some of them don't understand how we can now believe in hope and that those who have run this country into the ground over the last eight years have clearly shown us by the results of their rule, they truly believe that the needs of the few, clearly outweighs the needs of the many.
Now tell me, is that putting ???country first??? or ???profits first????
Very well said sir.
After watching debates, McCain shows symtoms of Post Tramatic Stress Disorder. Being a POW for 5 years, he could not help but have it. does not need stress of POUS. Does not have temperment for job. Under stress does not do well. He shows underlying rage all the time. Not 100% for Obama, but 100% against McCain. He scares the crap out of me.
Because McCain admits to his cheating and his ex says it is ok, not a moral issue? Very interesting, especially for someone who touts family values. Not MY values. Crashing 3 planes is not a very good pilot. If not for his father, he would not have stayed in Navy. He admitted he never applied himself to his pilot training, would rather party. Just another privileged brat who bluffed his way through life.
No, No, No, loriw, you should be the moral compass for your children and grandchildren. Just make sure you never did drugs, or if you did, you encourage them not to. Lets take responsibility for our own, and put it off on someone else.
Watch the crowds at McCain/Palin rallies on this video:
http://www.youtube.com/user/bravenewfilms
Then ask yourself seriously: "Do I want this to be my America?"
Afterwards, watch this political video with Andy Griffith, Opie and the Fonz. It's a blast from the past.
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/cc65ed650d
"Press Releases
AJC Strongly Condemns Rev. Jesse Jackson???s Comment on American Jews
October 14, 2008 - New York - The American Jewish Committee (AJC) has condemned the Rev. Jesse Jackson's statement about "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades."
"Rev. Jackson's remarks, which appeared in an interview with the journalist Amir Taheri in today's New York Post, echo classic anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about Jewish power," said AJC Executive Director David A. Harris. "This statement, regrettably, is not the first troubling comment by Rev. Jackson regarding Israel, Zionism and the Jewish people.
Arguing as a private citizen that an Obama administration could bring significant change to U.S. foreign policy, Jackson was quoted as saying that "Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades" would lose much of their influence should Senator Obama be elected president."
http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=ijITI2PHKoG&b=849241&ct=6107743
And people are upset about what some in the crowd are saying at Palin events? Isn't this the same Democrat leader who once called New York "Hymietown" ?
Jesse's comments concerning Barack's campaign has as much relevance as your comments would have.
In the early evening of Friday, December 15, 2000, with Christmas break only hours away, the U.S. Senate rushed to pass an essential, 11,000-page government reauthorization bill. In what one legal textbook would later call ???a stunning departure from normal legislative practice,??? the Senate tacked on a complex, 262-page amendment at the urging of Texas Sen. Phil Gramm.
There was little debate on the floor. According to the Congressional Record, Gramm promised that the amendment???also known as the Commodity Futures Modernization Act???along with other landmark legislation he had authored, would usher in a new era for the U.S. financial services industry.
???The work of this Congress will be seen as a watershed where we turned away from an outmoded Depression-era approach to financial regulation and adopted a framework that will position our financial services industry to be world leaders into the new century,??? Gramm said.
Watershed indeed. With the U.S. economy now battered by a tsunami of mortgage foreclosures, the $30-billion Bear Stearns Companies bailout and spiking food and energy prices, many congressional leaders and Wall Street analysts are questioning the wisdom of the radical deregulation launched by Gramm???s legislative package. Financial wizard Warren Buffett has labeled the risky new investment instruments Gramm unleashed ???financial weapons of mass destruction.??? They have fed the subprime mortgage crisis like an accelerant. While his distracted peers probably finalized their Christmas gift lists, Gramm created what Wall Street analysts now refer to as the ???shadow banking system,??? an industry that operates outside any government oversight, but, as witnessed by the Bear Stearns debacle, requiring rescue by taxpayers to avert a national economic catastrophe.
http://www.texasobserver.org/article.php?aid=2767
See: http://www.newsweek.com/id/164972
Stating that Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act wasn't what caused the meltdown, and noting that "economists on both sides of the political spectrum have suggested that the act has probably made the crisis less severe than it might otherwise have been." And also:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/who_caused_the_economic_crisis.html
Nowforthetruth
History..
The Glass-Steagall Act was enacted after the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing banking crisis and Great Depression. On the day it was signed, along with the National Industrial Recovery Act and other measures, President Franklin D. Roosevelt called the package "the most important and far-reaching legislation ever enacted by the American Congress."
The idea behind Glass-Steagall, named for the two lawmakers who wrote it, was that confidence in America's financial house could best be restored if bankers and brokers stayed in separate rooms. Such a separation, it was thought, achieved two purposes.
First, it would reduce the potential conflicts of interest between investment banking and commercial banking that were thought to have contributed to the speculative frenzy in the stock markets. Under the 1933 Banking Act, commercial banks could receive no more than 10 percent of their income from the securities markets, a limit so restrictive that most simply abandoned business on Wall Street.
Second, it would provide a safe harbor for the money of ordinary Americans by enabling them to put their money in accounts that were protected by deposit insurance and insulated from more speculative investments like stocks. (The 1933 act also established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which now insures bank deposits up to $100,000.)
http://partners.nytimes.com/library/financial/102399banks-congress.html
Nowforthetruth
The bills were introduced in the U.S. Senate by Phil Gramm (R-Texas) and in the U.S. House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa). The third lawmaker associated with the bill was Rep. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. (R-Va), Chairman of the House Commerce Committee from 1995 to 2001. [2] On May 6, 1999, the Senate passed the bills by a 54-44 vote along party lines (53 Republicans and one Democrat in favor; 44 Democrats opposed).[3] On July 20, the House passed a different version of the bill on an uncontested and uncounted voice vote. When the two chambers could not agree on a joint version of the bill, the House voted on July 30 by a vote of 241-132 (R 58-131; D 182-1) to instruct its negotiators to work for a law that ensured that consumers enjoyed medical and financial privacy and also "robust competition and equal and non-discriminatory access to financial services and economic opportunities in their communities" (i.e. protection against exclusionary redlining) [4] [5] The bill then moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. Democrats agreed to support the bill after Republicans agreed to strengthen provisions of the anti-redlining Community Reinvestment Act and address certain privacy concerns; the conference committee then finished its work by the beginning of November.[4] [6] On November 4, the final bill resolving the differences was passed by the Senate 90-8 [7] and by the House 362-57.[8] This legislation was signed into law by Democratic President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999.[9]
Democrats supported provisions of the anti-redlining Community Reinvestment Act and address certain privacy concerns not the Gramm's dereguation act that started the ball rolling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss