History of the ‘S’ Bomb

To all those who have supported the constant killing of the unborn, entitlements for those who don???t deserve them, for assisting undocumented illegals, to corrupted politicians, sanctuary cities, to USDA agents forcing the implantation of chips into the livestock herds of America, to those pushing social security numbers and locater chips on newborns, to thieves who forced an unconstitutional income tax on ???sovereign??? American workers, for the loss of privacy, the restraint of second amendment natural rights, to BATFE master search and arrest warrants, to SWAT teams and Taser Thugs in every hamlet in the land, to all of the homosexual rights fanatics and bullies who use their perverted lifestyles to intimidate my grandchildren in school and in the parks, to drug dealers who employ minority kids in Obama???s south Chicago neighborhoods, and the young men and women in our military who are now mercenaries trained to rove our streets when the first shots are fired and produce body counts similar to the ones in Iraq, you have become my potential enemy.

Obama represents a culture of extreme left wing liberals, with an agenda to reshape the American way of life. He has adopted a Niccolò Machiavelli."The Prince" attitude, justifying any means to achieve the end he desires. His represented positions, with respect to several critical issues, are not consistent with his historical stances, actions, or associations. He is a deceiver of the first class, with a golden mouth with which to fool the people, spewing out what ever will tickle their ears. This man is no patriot, he???s not even un-American, he???s anti-American. Beware Americans, what you see, is not what you???ll get.

The likely dangers of an Obama presidency ought to be obvious by now. Despite the man???s cool and personable veneer, he is a dangerous leftist who seeks to redistribute wealth, further expand government, and promote a divisive multiculturalism.

Barack Obama???s contempt for the U.S. Constitution ought to have been clear anyway, but a recently revealed 2001 interview makes it clear that he doesn???t much care for the document, as it does not authorize the radical redistributionism he favors.

To put it bluntly, Barack Obama does not really identify with the United States of America. Oh sure, he wants to be president of it, but he sees the presidency as his vehicle to transform the nation (and maybe the world). In other words, Obama sees the U.S.A. as a stage upon which to work his magic

Barrack Obama, is by far the most bigoted and racist individual in predominate American politics, today. He has a storied history of a deep hatred of white people, and a propensity to associate with radical black leaders. He and his wife are in essence, the poster children for the new wave of activist to rise up the poor oppressed blacks of this country, to positions of prominence. He has been groomed and supported by a consortium of radical left wing groups and individuals in Chicago, for the past twenty five years, expressly for this cause.

Comment: C-SPAN THIRD PARTY DEBATE

http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/includes/templates/library/flash_popup.php?pID=281952-1&clipStart=&clipStop=

C-SPAN THIRD PARTY VP DEBATED NOVEMBER 2

TECHRESMGT: Let's not try to get too smart here. An epithet is simply an adjective, generally used for negative characterizations. Common today we use the word epithet to describe words and phrases meant to demean and defame, and they do not necessarily have to be true. I'm most certain that the word "socialist", as it is being thrown around by the GOP and it's sponge-brained constituents is not being used in a positive manner. Please note: In the previous sentence the tern "sponge-brained" was used as an epithet. This will conclude today's English lesson.

Journalists really should consult a good dictionary before they start making statements that educated people will 'see right through'. This story uses the word 'epithet' to infer the usage of the word 'socialism' is undeserved and akin to a slur. Here is the dictionary definition of epithet: any word or phrase applied to a person or thing to describe an actual or attributed quality. An ACTUAL or attributed quality. I guess it's true, thanks for the info! The Obama Administration wants to introduce pure socialism into the American way of life. Bad plan, people.

The Ku Klutz Klan, David Duke University, Weekley Standard,American Enterprise Institute, American Nazi Pary, Kristol,Rupert Murdoch, Wolfowitz, Jonah Goldberg, Frum, Hannity, Fixed News, Heinrich Himmler, Saxby Chambliss,---- PROUDLY ENDORSES , " JOHN McCAIN

Obama in this video is campaigning at a convention of Acorn and I believe two other Community Activist's organizations. Ask if he will be their ally if he becomes President and pledge to meet with leaders of Acorn and the others present at the convention in his first year, Obama says, quote:

"Yes, but let me say that before I even get inaugurated, during the transition, we are going to be calling all of you in to help us shape the agenda."

See and hear it for yourself. Obama has promised that Acorn and other groups like it will a part of his transition and setting his agenda if elected:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vJcVgJhNaU

See Barney Franks comments on the news, including face the nation last week, stating that Democrats in Congress intend to greatly raise taxes and go on a spending spree.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1Mazjm_A5k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGnSAlqjoU

See http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/23617.html


And again what was Frank saying at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix Fannie and Freddie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

"These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis, the more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."

So who really is the liar that soaked the American people?

See also: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/08/politics/main2335631.shtml

In the exchange with "Joe the plumber" we found out that Obama really is as radical as his early political acquaintances, Davis, Ayers, Wright, etc., and that he is into the failed economic policy of wealth redistribution. Obama's tax and spending plans alone would be bad enough, but add Reid and Pelosi to the mix, with the three of them controlling both houses of Congress and the executive branch without any effective restraint, and you have something that should causes concern even among moderate Democrats.
See Wall Street Journal: A Liberal Supermajority:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html

Their failed policies are what brought us to ruin. Even Bill Clinton says so. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsynspIqAoE
Obama and a supermajority of Democrats simply is not the change we need, nor is it change we can afford.

Obama's programs require him to tax, and his health care plan alone is a substantial hidden tax on all business, large an small. In reality, it does not really matter who he taxes, those taxes are going to be passed through the economy. He has to tax, because it is they only way he can pay for his massive social engineering experiments. Any first year economics student knows that taxation is a tool used to contract an economy experiencing inflation, because it reduces demand by reducing the amount of money individuals and businesses have to spend. It is contractionary, which is exactly what you do not want to do when the problem is that the economy is contracting already into recession. Like Hoover and FDR, Obama's plans will only make it worse for longer.
See e.g. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/03/opinion/main4499465.shtml
And
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx

WE ARE ALREADY CONTROLLED BY "THE GOVERNMENT" MCCAIN IS THE ANSWER, TRANSLATES TO....

ANY OLE WHITE MALE AND ANY UNDER EDUCATED WHITE FEMALE WILL DO....

JUST KEEP THE WHITE HOUSE WHITE, BY ANY AND ALL MEANS.

MCCAIN WILL RAISE YOUR TAXES AND THE FEDERAL, STATE, CITY & COUNTY GOVERNEMENTS....

ALREADY TELL YOUR DUMB ASS WHAT TO DO AND YOUR ASS HAD BETTER DO AS THE FEDERAL, STATE, CITY & COUNTY GOVERNMENTS TELL YOU WHAT TO DO....

OR FACE THE DAMN CONSEQUENCES.

WHETHER ITS OBAMA OR MCCAIN...

THE GOVERNMENTS ABOVE, WILL TELL YOUR LAME ASS, WHAT TO DO....

GOT IT...GOOD...GREAT !!!

NOW TAKE THOSE RNC [SCARE TACTICS ] BACK TO FOX NEWS, SEAN HANNITY, RUSH LIMBAUGH, UGLY GRETA VAN STERSEN AND CRYSTAL METH-HEROIN ADDICT ANN COULTER AND TELL THEM OMAAR SENT YOU THIS MESSAGE.

WHETHER ITS OBAMA OR MCCAIN, THE GOVERNMENT WILL TELL YOU WHAT TO DO NOW AS IT HAS IN THE PAST, AS WELL AS THE FUTURE.....

YOU REPUBLICANS ARE JUST SCARED TO DEATH OF A [BI-RACIAL MAN] AND HIS FAMILY AS THE 1ST FAMILY OF AMERICA.

I WISHED YOU RACIST FELT THIS WAY ABOUT THE CURRENT 1ST FAMILY....

BUT WE KNOW THE SCORE..

RACISM IS ALIVE AN WELL, DYING A HARD DEATH, BUT STILL VERY MUCH ALIVE.

ASHLEY TODD, IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF SUCH RACE HATE AN THE EXTREMES IN WHICH SHE WENT TO DERAIL OBAMA, TO NO AVAIL....


OBAMA CAN NOW PUT PENNSYLVANIA IN THE WIN COLUMN...THATS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN RACE BAITING HAPPENS TO M VERY EVIL PEOPLE, IT OFTENTIMES WORKS AGAINST THE RACE MONGER.

NOTE: THIS GOVERNMENT'S 2 WARS ARE NOT FINANCED BY THE USA, BUT BY STILL VERY ...

[COMMUNIST SOCIALIST- RED CHINA]

QUESTION: IS PRESIDENT BUSH A [SOCIALIST ] ?


BECAUSE IF WE ARE THIS TRULY MONEY POWER, A TRUE WORLD POWER, WHY ARE WE NOT FINANCING OUR 2 WARS, OURSESELVES, WITH OUR OWN MONEY ?

THATS WHAT [INDEPENDENT COUNTRIES] DO OR WHY ARE WE NOT BORROWING MONEY FROM OUR ALLIED NATIONS, OPPOSED TO A STILL VERY [COMMUNIST-SOCIALIST COUNTRY] LIKE [RED CHINA] ....HMMM

-----------------------------------------------------------

WOULD'NT THAT MAKE THE US GOVERNMENT [SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST] ALSO AND THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION [SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST] AS WELL...

THIS [SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST] ACT MUST BE A TITLE OR TAG OF CONVENIENCE OR IS INTERCHANGEABLE, DEPENDING ON WHOSE USING IT TO HIS OR HER NATION'S ADVANTAGE....

I'M STUMPED

I BELIEVE WE LIVE IN A ...

MILITARY RAN, CAPITALIST, SOCIALIST, SOME WHAT RELIGOUSLY TOLERANT COUNTRY.....

--------------------------------------------

IF THATS WHAT SOME OF YOU CALL [DEMOCRACY] SO BE IT.

See also
http://www.newsweek.com/id/164732 from this web site. (oops!) stating that Freddie Mac was spending tax payer money to target Republicans in 2005 who were trying to regulate Fannie and Freddies fraud. Democrats were not targeted, as the were all in the tank with Fannie and Freddie to kill the regulations. Hear that, the article admits that Republicans were trying to regulate Freddie and Fannie, and Democrats were trying to stop it from happening as a means to facilitate the Community Reinvestment Act.

See also: http://www.newsweek.com/id/164972
Stating that Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act wasn't what caused the meltdown, and noting that "economists on both sides of the political spectrum have suggested that the act has probably made the crisis less severe than it might otherwise have been."

In the exchange with "Joe the plumber" we find out that Obama really is as radical as his early political acquaintances, Davis, Ayers, Wright, etc., and that he is into the failed economic policy of wealth redistribution. Obama's tax and spending plans alone would be bad enough, but add Reid and Pelosi to the mix, with the three of them controlling both houses of Congress and the executive branch without any effective restraint, and you have something that should causes concern even among moderate Democrats.
See Wall Street Journal: A Liberal Supermajority:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html

Their failed policies are what brought us to ruin. Even Bill Clinton says so. Obama and a supermajority of Democrats simply is not the change we need, nor is it change we can afford.

"A former Newsweek reporter admitted in an article this week that he has no objectivity and imagined disabling Rudy Giuliani so he wouldn't run in the presidential primary race last year.
Michael Hastings wrote in GQ magazine that he had a "recurring fantasy" that he could somehow stop the former New York City mayor in his tracks.
"I quickly realized Rudy was a maniac. I had a recurring fantasy in which I took him out during a press conference (it was nonlethal, just something that put him out of commission for a year or so), saving America from the horror of a President Giuliani. If that sounds like I had some trouble being 'objective,' I did. Objectivity is a fallacy," he said."

http://men.style.com/gq/features/full?id=content_7484&pageNum=2

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/55_say_media_bias_bigger_problem_than_campaign_cash

55% Say Media Bias Bigger Problem Than Campaign Cash

http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2008/cyb20080819.asp

Pew Research finds Media Credibility Plummets, Just 30% Believe 'Most Trusted' CNN

Dear Ben, while I can appreciate your imagination in making up this story, it has nothing to do with what Obama is talking about. First of all,

Taxation is and always has been a redistribution of wealth. Once you recognize that point, the question is, how are we going to spend the money we raise in taxes?

For the past 8 years, our tax dollars have gone to killing civilians in Iraq and giving big payoffs to Halliburton (co-incidentally owned by the Cheney family). And since there wasn't enough in the treasury to do this in style, we borrowed money from communist China and ran up the national debt to pay for it.

Like 80% of Americans, I am sick of this particular redistribution plan.

Obama's plan reduces taxes on 98% of Americans. The other 2% of us (who make over $250,000 a year) can afford to pay an extra 3%. That extra 3% comes out to only $300 for every $10,000 they make above $250,000. It's not going to kill them. In fact, if you make over $250,000 a year, $300 probably doesn't mean much to you. The other source of increased revenue will be making corporations that ship jobs overseas pay a higher share of tax. Right now, these corporations pay a lower share than companies that keep their employees in the USA. No more incentives to hurt America. We all can agree with that.

Obama promises to go through the Federal budget line by line and cut all the wasteful spending. He promises to have transparency, a website where you can go and actually see the real Federal budget, not the made for TV version you can access under Bush.

Furthermore, Obama's economic plans will lead to a strong economy, an educated workforce, more American based jobs, affordable health care, and freedom from foreign oil. We will regain our position as a world leader, a nation that spreads democracy not with guns and threats, but with prosperity and diplomacy.

How do I know this? I read Obama's Blueprint for Change. And I compared it to what McCain had to offer (more tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, more wars, a really inadequate health plan, and the stated intention of overturning Roe v. Wade). You really should visit the websites of both candidates and read their platforms.

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

http://www.johnmccain.com/Issues/jobsforamerica/