History of the ‘S’ Bomb

Please, find out for yourself, what it is that Obama has subscribed to for the past 20 years. It???s not a matter of the ranting of Rev. Wright, but rather the doctrine, teachings and political implications of the theology.
Look into the teachings of James Cone and Cornel West, and how they accepted and integrated the principals of Carl Marx into Black Theology.
Black Liberation Theology is a makeover of the Marxist Liberation Theology that came from the Marxist party in Cuba after the revolution in the sixties, to offset the influence of the Catholic Church over the majority of the citizenry of that country.
This theology is at the heart of the historical beliefs and associations of Barrack Obama.
My conclusion is that this man is a Marxist Socialist, and has a hidden agenda, that is disguised by campaign rhetoric designed to fool the people.
I would rather you came to your own well informed conclusions. I hope you will consider the theological proclamation for the ???Redistribution of Wealth??? and the denouncing of all Zionist influence in this country and of the state of Israel.

Obama represents a culture of extreme left wing liberals, with an agenda to reshape the American way of life. He has adopted a Niccolò Machiavelli."The Prince" attitude, justifying any means to achieve the end he desires. His represented positions, with respect to several critical issues, are not consistent with his historical stances, actions, or associations. He is a deceiver of the first class, with a golden mouth with which to fool the people, spewing out what ever will tickle their ears. This man is no patriot, he???s not even un-American, he???s anti-American. Beware Americans, what you see, is not what you???ll get.

SOMEBODY FORGOT WHO HELPED BIN LADEN WITH THE RUSSIANS?

Obama is no patriot. He's not even un-American. He's anti-American.
The Black Liberation Theology he has subscribed to for over twenty years, bids the destruction of virtually every American Ideal that is responsible for making this country the greatest force for good, the world has ever known. It is his allegiance to this theology, that prevented him from wearing a flag pin, saluting the flag, and caused him to turn his back on the flag, when the National Anthem was played. He's a traitor.

Take a moment, Google this name, Dr. Khalid Abdullah Tario Al-Mansour. Check out the connections. This is beyond belief. Truly fascinating.

To demonstrate the connection of Obama to various radicals, especially his ties to Bill Aires, further investigation into whom, by what means and for what reason, sponsored his enrollment at Harvard (Khalid Al-Mansour). The record will illustrate that his further education was part of a grooming campaign, initiated by this radical group. The connections all fit the pattern. The actions all fit the pattern. This guy is exactly what he has been groomed to be under the tutelage of Ayers, Farrakhan, Wright, and others. His true purpose; deceive the American public by a "change" rhetoric that morphs into what ever is politically expedient. He has been tremendously successful at persuading the far left wing of the Democratic Party, into believing that he is simply liberal like them. With this support and the very negative feelings with respect to the Bush administration, a large faction of voters, has had the wool pulled over their eyes. Fact is he is a radical with a secret agenda that is bent on the destruction of virtually all the values most Americans hold very dear. If elected, the destruction he will level on our democracy will be greater then ten thousand of Mr. Ayer???s bombs, wreak more havoc that ten million of Mr. Farrakhan???s militant Black Muslims, and loose a demonic force greater than even Mr. Wright might imagine.

In almost every case, people associated with a particular faith or denomination of that faith, do so because they are comfortable with its tenants and teachings, and how it impacts their lives.
Please, find out for yourself, what it is that Obama has subscribed to for the past 20 years. It???s not a matter of the ranting of Rev. Wright, but rather the doctrine, teachings and political implications of the theology.
Look into the teachings of James Cone and Cornel West, and how they accepted and integrated the principals of Carl Marx into Black Theology.
Black Liberation Theology is a makeover of the Marxist Liberation Theology that came from the Marxist party in Cuba after the revolution in the sixties, to offset the influence of the Catholic Church over the majority of the citizenry of that country.
This theology is at the heart of the historical beliefs and associations of Barrack Obama.
My conclusion is that this man is a Marxist Socialist, and has a hidden agenda, that is disguised by campaign rhetoric designed to fool the people.
I would rather you came to your own well informed conclusions. I hope you will consider the theological proclamation for the ???Redistribution of Wealth??? and the denouncing of all Zionist influence in this country and of the state of Israel.

Just look at who's calling this out; Barry Goldwater; and he said it to Johnson indicating that JFK was a weak man??? Goes to show you how the GOP actually think, and it's certainly not for the dare I say, REAL, American people!! MCCain talks about welfare, and as usual he is playing on words; as it says in the Constitution that certain things are done for the welfare of the American people. As usual, he will twist and turn anything to try and win!! And the bit about an all Dem gov is only bull. The Court, as we all know, is most Repub and will be for years to come. Also, please don't forget that it was an all GOP gov under Bush until the congressional of '06; but the Senate is still GOP in the majority!! Lies, lies, lies, is all MCCain knows!!!!!!!!

Ah...so now everyone on the red and blue teams are talking about 'socialism' again. Fantastic. So let's get down to the nitty-gritty:

Almost ALL of you are socialists of a degree.

Don't believe me? Chances are if you're a republican / "conservative", you want more of our tax dollars to go to law enforcement, the military, and the "securing of our borders, language and culture" Those tax dollars come from everyone, even those who may not agree with those policies. Perhaps you're against gay marriage, even though gays/lesbians still have to pay taxes that go to the running of the bureaucracies that handle state marriage licenses (the only legal marriage documents in the US).

That would be forced wealth redistribution,... a.k.a 'Socialism' as we seem to be defining it for this article.

If you're a Democrat / "liberal", then chances are good that you "wide-sweeping social reform" where the government "takes care of people" and everyone has a "right" to healthcare, even though that requires others who may not want State-run healthcare to pay for it. Perhaps you also want to ensure that [X] programs are taught in public schools, even though it may fly in face of the religious beliefs of certain families, and they would rather not see their taxes go to such programs.

That's also forced wealth redistribution.

So it seems like the only *real* difference here, is which bureaucrats/programs you wish to force your fellow Americans to pay for. So *is* there really a difference between the Red Teams and Blue teams, and are *you* not by your very own definitions.....

A SOCIALIST! (Dun-dun-dunnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn)

Observations:
Apparently no Republican has ever needed any kind of government assistance.
Apparently Republicans hold all of the jobs in this country because to listen to them all Dems (and only Dems)are standing in welfare and unemployment lines.
Apparently there are no Republicans without health insurance and they all are able to pay for their health care.
Apparently none of them give a hoot about our environment because only Dems are (in their words) "tree huggers".
Apparently not one Repbulican has ever been faced with making a choice about an unwanted pregnancy. Of the hundreds of thousands of abortions performed legally in this country, apparently not one of those women were Rebulican. While I personally do not believe in abortion, I support choice wholeheartedly. Why do the Republicans throw the Pro-choice / Pro-Life issue up every chance they get. We have had a Republican administration 20 out of the past 28 years. If they truly were Pro-Life they had ample opportunity to change things.

in line