The View From ‘Nowhere’

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: abbankhead @ 10/25/2008 8:56:55 PM

    Ok so Palin had clothes for the campaign but why did the family have to have new clothes? What happened to cutting funds when you can $150,000.00 is more than my house and many others that are military families that are in foreclosure or filing for bankrupcy. I am school teacher, special education to be exact, and I will never make that much in a teaching year. And as for her knowing alot about special ed services for families with special needs children, she is using her child to make brownie points with parents with special needs children. Their lives are not to be played with campaign promises she knows can not be met or made light of. I love my students about as much as their parents do. I have taught pre-k through 12 grade and their are parents that exploit their kids to make a buck and I see this in Palin. What next... a promise to nowhere for special ed parents?

    • Posted By: itshouldbeaboutallofus @ 10/25/2008 9:16:17 PM

      ""Their lives are not to be played with campaign promises she knows can not be met or made light of.
      I have taught pre-k through 12 grade and their are parents that exploit their kids to make a buck and I see this in Palin. What next... a promise to nowhere for special ed parents?""

      I so agree with you, no life should be exploited.... especially those needed protection...

      Just curious tho, isn't this special needs child of Palin's REALLY her grandchild... the childtof her minor daughter... concieved as a result of rape, the one she would not consent to have an abortion because she is a vowed prolife candidate. Is this another one of her lies? ? ? OR is this just another one of her exploitations of this child amongst many others.

      • Posted By: Beargirl @ 10/25/2008 11:15:53 PM

        I mean real sick liberal crap.

      • Posted By: xnavyproud @ 10/25/2008 10:04:43 PM

        You should have stayed with the pre-schoolers if you can't decide the proper uses of the words their and there. How are you with Das Kapital?

        • Posted By: abbankhead @ 10/25/2008 11:15:53 PM

          That's not needed, people make typos all the time on blogs. Don't be petty. We were having a decent conversation.

          • Posted By: xnavyproud @ 10/26/2008 12:20:51 AM

            I'm sorry! The posting that Trig is Sarah's grand-son has been proven as impossible. Down syndrome is a problem with older parents. Life experiences alter one's DNA. It is one of the possibilities when older folks have a baby.

            • Posted By: abbankhead @ 10/26/2008 7:52:17 PM

              I agree, I don't believe the baby is her grandson either. Lies are out there on all the canidates. You have some pretty good answers and comments. Thanks for posting.

      • Posted By: Beargirl @ 10/25/2008 11:14:26 PM

        liberal crap

    • Posted By: Beargirl @ 10/25/2008 11:13:22 PM

      liberal crap

      • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 10:08:58 PM

        Beargirl, you are a Godsend.

    • Posted By: xnavyproud @ 10/25/2008 10:00:08 PM

      The money for those clothes was donated by us Republicans. Much of Obama's money came from foreigners (which is Illegal). Obama's victory party is going to cost $2,000,000 in Grant Park, Chicago, Illinois. Do you feel bad about that?

      • Posted By: abbankhead @ 10/25/2008 10:46:33 PM

        Where each campaign gets there donations is if-y at times. But if the price is 2million for Obama how much for McCain's? I hate to see anyone spend crazy money on anything. But you have to admit, it will be a major victory if Obama wins. It would deserve to have party to end all parties. Just as it would be for McCain Palin. I live a basic American life and I like you know the hardships of the military family during times like this. I just made my mind up recently for the election. I was all for McCain in 2000 and had Hilary won I would be voting for him now. But I take objection when he stated he was not going to run a negative campaign during the primaries and change his tune once Obama won. What changed to make him go negative so quickly? And let's not talk about Ms Palin and how she thinks she is the ticket leader.

        • Posted By: xnavyproud @ 10/26/2008 12:04:10 AM

          Obama said that he wouldn't run a negative campaign, but he is. He hasn't released very much of his background. He's a pig in a poke, I tell you. Obama also said that he would take public funding like McCain did, but he didn't. He is constantly changing. His word is worthless. He is the "Scar" in "Lion King". The best part of his winning will be what he does to the economy. Us country folk that know how to survive will do just fine. The coastal areas of the country are in for a real bad time.

      • Posted By: Beargirl @ 10/25/2008 11:13:49 PM

        amen

  • Posted By: KTN96 @ 10/26/2008 9:53:07 PM

    It's about time Ketchikan steps up and sets the story straight!

  • Posted By: CR46 @ 10/25/2008 9:49:58 PM

    Where is your bridge??? Ask your Governor Palin, the money was sent to Alaska for the bridge and not returned. What did the bridge money get spent on???? More clothes for Palin?????

    • Posted By: Beargirl @ 10/25/2008 10:59:18 PM

      liberal crap

      • Posted By: angelica915 @ 10/25/2008 11:19:29 PM

        No, Just the truth. Ask her what she did with the $230,000,00 she received for that "Bridge to Nowhere"?

        • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 9:36:48 PM

          The money went to the Alaska Department of Transportation.

        • Posted By: Beargirl @ 10/25/2008 11:59:06 PM

          Stuttering again!

      • Posted By: angelica915 @ 10/25/2008 11:19:54 PM

        No, Just the truth. Ask her what she did with the $230,000,00 she received for that "Bridge to Nowhere"?

  • Posted By: AKgrandma @ 10/25/2008 10:05:14 PM

    Haven't any of you people who live in the lower 48 ever heard of Google Earth??? Take a "trip" to Southeast Alaska and see for yourself what the country is like. There is no flat land in southeast; water and mountains. The islands are just the tops of partially submerged mountains. They had to flatten out part of Gravina Island to make an airport. You don't have to go to Alaska to see this. That's what computers are for. Google Earth is free, for G-d's sake!

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 7:16:25 PM

      Suggest that you would have more dignity without G_d's name. It's totally unnecessary and useless.

  • Posted By: Athenasmom @ 10/25/2008 10:07:11 PM

    I have lived in Ketchikan for 15 years. So I know first hand the importance of that bridge. Our town dies in the winter. All of the tourist shops close and get boarded up,which make up the majority of our downtown. Having that bridge would allow growth for more local businesses that just dont cater to tourists and would help the unemployment problem that comes with winter. And maybe in th future we could put a few businesses on Pennock Island,which is the island that is between Gravina and Revilla which Ketchikan is located. All of you can be outraged by this,but until you come and live here, you will never understand the huge difference that bridge would make for our community.

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 7:13:09 PM

      Then do what you have to do. Contacting Stevens, Murkowski, and Young would be a start. You have to take it from there. Lots of Luck!

  • Posted By: Alaskantoo @ 10/25/2008 10:17:07 PM

    The government IS responsble to maintain and build the infrastructure of the country. That is why there are highways that span the entire country. We pay taxes to build and maintain that infrastructure. If the country believes there are better ways to spend the country's money, so be it. But there have been many government projects to build and maintain the countries infrastructure. Some of you seem to think you have the ability to pay for maintenance of the bridges and highways in your area without federal dollars. Freethinker79, I sure hope you appreciate all the federal taxes paid by us in Alaska that have helped pay for your highways, airports, and other public access ways. Too bad you can't see how Alaska should recieve the same benefits you enjoy. by the way, I have never heard anyone in Alaska call people in the lower 48 "scum". We tend to be pretty tough and individualistic, but we also should get our share of the tax benefits the lower 48 has received for hundreds of years now.

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 6:09:41 PM

      Tell Ted Stevens, Lisa Murkowski, and Don Young, or all of them. That's how it works.

    • Posted By: bgerard2 @ 10/25/2008 10:29:24 PM

      Where Alaskantoo does it empower our FEDERAL GOVERNMENT to "build the infrastructure of the country?". Remember the 10th Amendment? "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
      Build your own bloody bridges! It's time to STOP socialism not embrace it further with the likes of Obama!

      • Posted By: Beargirl @ 10/25/2008 10:50:42 PM

        Amen

        • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 11:04:57 AM

          I like the way you think.

      • Posted By: Alaskantoo @ 10/25/2008 10:55:36 PM

        Its okay with me as long as EVERYONE including your community has to build all their own bridges and roads etc.. Just make sure you turn down those federal tax dollars when they come your way and open up your wallets to help pay for all the infrastructure in your area. Also I guess that would mean paying for those portions of the interstate highways that run through your state. Do you think perhaps there may be a good reason for the Federal government to be involved in the countries infrastructure? Whether or not its in the constitution do you really believe there isnt' a need for a national plan?

        If all states could be run like a free market business, then Alaska would probably be charging you a lot more for our oil.

        • Posted By: bgerard2 @ 10/26/2008 4:25:45 AM

          I am against all unconstitutional abuses and blob like expansions of our out of control and ever increasing in scope of a Federal government INCLUDING my own community and state. And as far as Alaska charging me (I am a Texan) more for "your oil" - hardly. We have our own and we also refine the bulk of our nation's petrochemical supplies along with Louisiana our sister state. Meanwhile we get treated like the armpit of the country. Nuclear waste dumps, garbage dumps for other states with blatant cases of NIMBYism (Not In My Backyard!), Our nation's Strategic Oil Reserve in our saltdomes near fragile coastal environments and estuaries that can leak, the pollution that we suffer from refining all of the gas for the rest of the country, busybody's wanting to interfere with our freedoms, liberties and beliefs such as firearms ownershipe and the death penality. Verbal jabs and smears constantly, especially from the left-wing liberals that we are all "bubbas" and dumbasses down here. And the fact contrary to what some other Einstein posted about Southern states "all getting like 6x back from what they pay in for federal tax dollars" we actually receive more like .37 cents for every dollar that we pay in. Socialism is just that - socialism and I firmly believe in the vision that our forefathers had for our country and our constitution. Obvsiously from your comments you think that it's just another set of rules made to be broken. And that's the beginning of the end for this once great republic. When people don't grasp the true equation at hand....

  • Posted By: morgan brown @ 10/25/2008 10:22:22 PM

    Instead of sending oil revenues collected by the state back to the residents of Alaska, why don't they use that money to build their own bridge?

    • Posted By: Alaskantoo @ 10/25/2008 10:43:36 PM

      You don't understand. Alaska does get a portion of the oil monies through taxing of the oil companies, but Alaska is not allowed to sell the oil to the highest bidders. The oil and the TransAlaskan pipeline are considered essential parts of the US infrastructure. It is a crucial supply of the countries oil.

      If you truly believe everything should be paid for locally without federal funding, then Alaska should be allowed to sell its resources to whom ever it wants to sell them. This would likely mean we would sell the oil to other countries willing to pay more for the oil, or would certainly mean you would have to pay more for your refined gasoline. If we were truly able to run our own state like a country or in a free market, I believe you would be in a world of hurt where you live and in Alaska we would become even a richer state than we are now.

      In addition, Alaskans pay federal income tax as well. You have received federal dollars for your infrastructure needs both for local projects and state run projects. Yet you seem to think Alaska shouldn't recieve funding. Are you saying that Alaska doesn't deserve a share of the federal taxes everyone else receives?

      • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 6:06:41 PM

        Tell Ted Stevens, Lisa Murkowski, or Don Young. Tell all of them if you like. That's the way it works. You are part of the problem.

  • Posted By: RosieMuffysticks@msn.com @ 10/25/2008 10:23:31 PM

    I lived in Ketchikan for six years. A bridge to Gravina would be a good idea. It is still a good idea. Sarah Palin as anything -- not a good idea!

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 6:02:12 PM

      You sound like a "spread the wealth" type.

    • Posted By: Beargirl @ 10/25/2008 10:47:57 PM

      Liberal crap.

  • Posted By: AKtoAZ @ 10/25/2008 10:31:15 PM

    It's nice to see that someone has finally come out and told more people about the "Bridge to No Where." Having grown up and lived in Ketchikan for 20 years, I know first hand how valuable the bridge would be for the community. No longer would people have to wait for a ferry every half an hour to get to the airport. No more would the few people that have chosen to live on Gravina have to suffer the weather conditions in their boats just to get their groceries. Most people do not realize that Ketchikan is classified as rain forest and has an annual rainfall averaging 13 feet a year. Ketchikan is a beautiful place to visit, but would be a much nicer place to live with the advantages of the bridge.

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 6:00:30 PM

      The bridge to nowhere is NOT a priority. The ferry is fine. Consider a helicopter shuttle or something else.

  • Posted By: wke235 @ 10/25/2008 10:37:15 PM

    It is still a Bridge to Nowhere. Look at all the aging bridges and road infrastructure we have elsewhere in the country. There are hundreds of bridges in need of rehabs or replacement, that are servicing 100's of Millions of commuters yearly in this country. And yet this mayor thinks it's important we spend huge piles of taxpayer money for a pitiful community of 14,000. I want my tax money spent on the major bridges and roads that support the major aspects of the US economy, not some rinky-dink area out where the Caribou outnumber to people.

    • Posted By: akresident @ 10/26/2008 2:27:36 AM

      What makes the 14,000 less important than the 100' of millions?!!! No caribou in Ketchikan, buy a globe Dumb a$$

      • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 5:57:29 PM

        You are nasty and disrespectful. I suggest that the bridge to nowhere is not a priority. A ferry is fine. Consider a helicopter shuttle or something else.

  • Posted By: coldweatherman @ 10/25/2008 10:49:51 PM

    Ketchikan is a very sociable,town that has citizens who are doing their best with what they have been given.
    The people are very friendly to visitors and love to talk to tourists.
    But let's turn the picture around-- what if this was San Francisco or New York and you had to take a ferry to work or to the airport just because your "governor" didn't need it so "they" opposed the bill?
    We, my wife and I, were there in August on our Honeymoon and we wandered around town, went into several stores, and never heard a store employee telling anyone they coouldn't help them find what they were looking for. And we had over 1300 ( that's one thousand three hundred Mr AK rider). and we were just one of FIVE cruise ships there at the same time. So if YOU haven't been there, don't talk like you know what you're talking about.
    Proud Army Veteran and PROUD AMERICAN.

    • Posted By: AK-rider @ 10/26/2008 12:00:16 AM

      You are a True American. I was merely proving a point that not everyone has the time to sit down and write out a "written to perfection" comment. I'm not one of those people that burns others because of their grammar or spelling, I just really don't like it when others do it, and find it comical when they themselves are guilty, lol.
      I love Ketchikan, it's beautiful, the people are friendly ( as are all Alaskans ), and the salmon fishing is worth the drive/fly/boat ride. I do believe that the residents of the town need that bridge. I don't believe that the OTHER bridge on that bill was necessary. The second bridge on that bill was the reason Palin killed it. And, yes, the state of Alaska did keep the money, to repair the roads in the rest of the state. I don't know if you realize this or not, but Alaska is sitting on the top of the pacific ring of fire. A huge fault line that runs between two tectonic plates. Earthquakes hit hard in the interior as well as south-east, and our roads get punnished by perma-frost ( Layers of ice in the ground that freeze and thaw anually ) that causes our asphalt roads to heave and crack. 90% of the roads in the community I live in are unpaved dirt, that only get bladed over with a road grader once a year, if we're lucky. In the winter, we don't put salt on our roads, because it is a danger to wildlife, and it would contaminate the groundwater that flows in to the residents' private water wells. So we have to fund plow trucks, gravel trucks, fuel to put in the equipment, money to purchase the gravel, pay the employees who do the work, ect. ect. And being as our winters are nine months long, it gets expensive. Leaving our schools underfunded, our police forces under-staffed, and many of the residential areas in the Tananna Valley out of fire service. Meaning if your house catches on fire, they don't put it out. I do know Alaska, and I love it here. I would never live anywhere else. The people are friendly, and the land is un-touched. Your neighbor will drive over to your house to jump start your car, and not worry that you're going to rob him. You can say "Hi" to people you don't know, and they give a pleasant greating, instead of a dirty look. As far as the lower 48, I don't think they understand what it's like to be a province and not a state. Outside animal rights activists can regulate our game laws, but we can't have access to the money promised at our statehood for infrastructure? We can't sell OUR oil on an open market, because it's under Federal management? Alaska has a small population because of a lack of infrastructure. Alaska gets it's funding through earmarks BECAUSE we have no voice in congress or senate. We get walked on by liberal democratic states that are overpopulated, and they graciously relieve us of our oil at a price mandated by them. Let us handle ALL of our issues, if you don't want to help with a few of them.

      • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 5:52:42 PM

        Your two Senators: Ted Stevens and Lisa Murkowski
        Your represenative: Don Young
        You ARE represented.

  • Posted By: leapingovergiants @ 10/25/2008 10:54:06 PM

    Financial crisis was caused by people spending more on credit than they could repay.

    Coming from a small town in a narrow valley, I know about the expansion problem. It's a pain in the rear.

    And i response to the "Build your own bloody bridges!" comment from bgerardz: small towns can't afford to build multimillion bridges across deep channels, you fool. And if you are so smart, why didn't you go back a reread your comment before you posted it? In the first sentence, did you mean, "WE'RE Alaskan, too."?! You must be part of that group that wants Alaska to become an independent nation!! I think we should stick you guys on an island together and see how you get along, and it all works out.

    • Posted By: bgerard2 @ 10/26/2008 4:13:36 AM

      Dear numbnutts: aka leapingovergiants

      In response to your "small towns can't afford to build multimillion bridges across deep channels, you fool".

      Since you are such a genius, I will issue you the same challenge. SHOW ME (or any of us) just WHERE in the constitution of the United States does it empower the Federal government to rob people of their money in their "voluntary income tax system" (that isn't so voluntary, just try not paying it) and redistribute the wealth like they have been doing INCLUDING building bridges for podunk towns across deep channels. And also just what did our founding fathers mean exactly when they penned the 10th Amendment? Do you have nary a clue?

      Sorry Charlie, you smell like Tuna but you are certainly not Starkist...

      • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 5:30:59 PM

        Very, very, very good. Sock it to 'em.

  • Posted By: forgotenman @ 10/25/2008 10:54:43 PM

    Bayfield and Lapointe Wisconsin are seperated by three miles of Lake Superior. Bayfield on the mainland and Lapointe on Madeline Island. Lapointe has an airport, Bayfield does not. The economy and growth potential of both communities would be greatly enhanced with a bridge spanning between them, making them one community. With the Mayor of Ketchikan's logic we need a bridge also here in Wisconsin. Pork barrell us!

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 5:28:12 PM

      I love it! I absolutely love it. I salute you.

  • Posted By: bedford08 @ 10/25/2008 10:57:06 PM

    I traveled to Ketchikan in 2006. The new mayor seems to forget that all of that publicity over the bridge, sure brought a lot of visitors to Ketchikan. Ketchikan has as many as three cruise ships at on time docked at the port. This city lives off of tourist and publicity. If the new mayor does not all the attention on Ketchikan, he can tell the ships and tourist not to come there. See how popular he is with that move. This is just another Palin bashing artical, by people who only wish they were as popular as she is is. The funny thing is that so many of us respect and like Gov. Palin. Funny how MSN and others don't print much about Biden and his near daily blunders. Ketchican may not have it's bridge to nowhere, but Obama has to bridge the gaps in Biden's speaches.

    • Posted By: akresident @ 10/26/2008 1:41:20 AM

      Bedfordo8; I'm sure the people in Ketchikan wouldn't mind if you tourists left, 90% of the tourist shops in Ketchikan are owned by people who live outside of Ketcikan and only come to make money in the summer off the tourism industry. This used to be a nice little logging town, with a pulp mill, and a thriving logging industry until tourists like you decided that the TONGASS was too small and special to cut down the trees. The Tongass is huge by the way and needs thinning. Ketchikan doesn't need tourist as much as you think they do. The residents are year around, do you think they support their families on summer tourist money WHATEVER!!!! IDIOT!!!!! People live here, this is not a town that rolls up the streets after the tourists leave in the fall. THIS IS NOT DISNEYLAND, WE DO NOT CLOSE THE DOORS AND SHUT OFF THE LIGHTS TO THE PARK AFTER ALL THE PATRONS LEAVE AT NIGHT. CAN YOU HEAR YOURSELF DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, FOR CRYING OUT LOUD LEAVE CREEK STREET AND SEE THE REST OF THE TOWN DOLLY DOESN'T WANT YOU AT HER HOUSE EITHER.

      • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 5:26:35 PM

        Get a grip on yourself.

  • Posted By: _Liberal_Killer_ @ 10/25/2008 11:05:27 PM

    this is liberal crap at its best. to check legitemacy, just read the end note: Kiffer is the NEWLY elected mayor of Ketchikan.

    • Posted By: angelica915 @ 10/25/2008 11:24:41 PM

      Ask your Governor what she did with the $230,000,00 she received for that "Bridge to Nowhere"?
      No Liberal crap to cloud up your pea brain, just ask her what she did with the money, I think that is easy to do, you only have 600,000 people in your state, and I'm sure not all of them are clogging up the phone lines.

      • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 5:11:46 PM

        The Alaska Department of Transportation got it. Got It?

  • Posted By: bobomack @ 10/25/2008 11:13:36 PM

    This is another side of the story the media forgot to look into. Instead they've been mezmorized by Palin and being VP. This chick is a terrorist to her own state and is fast learning to live of the taxpayers, just like a career politition. To be honest, when her and Mccain lose, I wouldn't give a plum nickel for her political future.!!!

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 5:09:42 PM

      The "GREAT ONE" has spoken. Please bow down to him.

  • Posted By: connorp3 @ 10/25/2008 11:20:14 PM

    i agree with wolf wolfman. except the obama osama comment. as much as i dislike obama i have to say that's obviously not true, though by the sound of his name you wouldn't know it. but i'm sure how we got to this but;
    obama is socialist. or communist if you will. look at his veiws. spread the wealth. that's the start of all communist systems. it is a good idea, but never ever works out. it simply doesn't work. and it's certainly not suitable for the united states of america. people, not working, making money off of their laziness and inabillity to lift a finger for him/herself and him/her's family. it's ridiculous. that's what will happen. one man goes to work, works a 57 hour week. (i know a man like this) and one day, may make just as much as the lazy, ignorant man who refuses to pay his child support nor his bills. doesn't work, doesn't do anything, but still makes money for his LAZINESS. it's ludacrious. if barack hussein obama is elected as president i don't know what will happen. other than a huge decrease in our nations work force, because they don't need to because they'll be getting money for not working!!??? ridiculous! obviously nothing will get done. lazy people. nothing being done to increase the potential of our nation. also how does barack have any experience to do this job? on xm radio a host asked "give me one thing barack obama has done in his career to qualify himself to be the president?" out of everyone that called in (obviously only obama supporters called in) not one had an answer. "change change change. he's gonna change this he's gonna change that." but not a single person could say what he has done. he simply has a huge lack of experience. not to say the palin doesn't. but still. thankyou, connor

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 4:54:09 PM

      Obama's friend Bill Ayers bombed the Pentagon. Look it up. Osama's friends ran an airplane into the Pentagon. Look it up.

  • Posted By: RNorth954 @ 10/25/2008 11:42:58 PM

    Wow! Eloquently stated! The "bridge to nowhere" is simply to correct the governments' placement of the airport on a seperate Island. It is merely the completion of a project started decades ago. A project that was "tweaked" after groundbreaking leaving the once whole project broken into segments or installments. The bridge was simply to be the next phase toward original project completion.

    Mayor Kiffer, I think you should be given your bridge! Gov't needs to honor the completion of the agreed upon original project proposal... Take it to the mattresses. Best regards, R North in Fort Lauderdale, FL

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 4:45:47 PM

      You sound like another "spread the wealth" type.

    • Posted By: davidehenriksen @ 10/25/2008 11:45:19 PM

      I agree with the mayor, the system failed his town and became the butt of national jokes so someone could score unwarranted political points. But the thing I don't understand (other than why the issue of Obama was associated with the issue of a bridge) is why it's socialism (and automatically bad) for taxes collected from the "wealthy" to be distributed to the "poor", but when the taxes collected from the $40,000 a year I make as a public school teacher is transfered to some large corporation run by a bunch of incompetent/border line criminals, that is supposed to be OK. The whole point of taxes is to redistribute income, for the benefit of society as a whole, not for the benefit of a few. A bridge connecting a town with its airport is probably just as worthwhile as say, rebuilding a country with several billion dollars in the bank earned from the sale of oil on the world market. But like I said, I am just a public school teacher and not considered very bright by a large segment of the American public.

  • Posted By: bluskygrl @ 10/25/2008 11:44:23 PM

    Discuss something more important than a bridge like safety or the economy?? Did you not read what this bridge means to this small town. My family and I once had the priviilege of calling this "small town" home, and the birth place of one of my children, while my husband served in the military. That bridge you belittle signifies something much greater than the smirk you gave. Ketchian is a survivor despite the loss of its two largest industries over the past twenty years. You can divide issues and people along party lines, but this little town has an amazing population whose people has stuck it out and stuck together despite the continued broken promises and lack of funding. You have to ask yourself why the mayor and long time resident of a small town in a huge state feels strongly enough to speak out against the current government, when intuitively it would rather tout its strengths on a worldwide stage. Sure tells me its time to think hard about whether or not we want that for the country?

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 4:43:42 PM

      You sound like a "spread the wealth" type to me.

  • Posted By: colorodan @ 10/25/2008 11:45:43 PM

    Any tourist who has started or finished a visit to Alaska in Ketchican -- as I did some years ago -- understands why the bridge was needed for both local users and visitors. Juneau has a bridge connecting it to Douglas Island across the channel, and there's no airport there, just neighborhoods and the small businesses that go with them. It's too bad that Sarah Palin felt a need to distort this story for political ends, and at the expense of a respectable Alaska community. She was far more generous with federal dollars to her own home town, before the nation was paying attention. I hope that, if and when Ketchican finds the means to expand, Mayor Kiffer demonstrates better sense and vision than his governor did in Wasilla.

    • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/26/2008 4:41:02 PM

      Palin won. You lost. Get over it.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse