The View From ‘Nowhere’

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: Sweet Pea 1 @ 10/25/2008 7:06:17 PM

    I would've said 'build the bridge, until I read the comments sent by other readers. I have to say, that since Alaska has so few people, a ferry sounds more practical. They aren't obsolete, (many placces still use ferry),
    and the cost of upkeep to a bridge (due the extreme weather conditions in Alaska), cpuld be enormous.
    Carol Harris, Georgia

    • Posted By: xnavyproud @ 10/25/2008 7:24:39 PM

      Oh, come on. She is married to a 1/4 indiginous native. Does that sound racist to you? There has never been a Republican slave owner. If memory of history serves, we are the party that freed the slaves. We believe in individual rights and responsibilities. Democrats want to tax us and give the money away. They heard the story of Robin Hood one to many times as children,

      • Posted By: DANHAAN27 @ 10/25/2008 7:37:51 PM

        LEARN YOUR HISTORY, AS AMATTER OF FACT JOHN MCCAINS FAMILY OWNED SLAVES FOR SO LONG THEY TOKE THE MCCAIN NAME AND THERE DESENDENTS STILL LIVE TODAY

        • Posted By: akresident @ 10/26/2008 4:47:13 AM

          Do you truely believe that we are only the sum of our forefathers and as such we are unable to grow as individuals? We all have history in our families. Let us not split hairs and draw conclusions based on the acts of te men and women who came before us many years pryor to our conception.

        • Posted By: xnavyproud @ 10/25/2008 8:37:25 PM

          Ignorance is bliss. The Republican party was formed in 1854 in Ripon, Wisconsin. The party was formed to end slavery and to open up land for homesteading. Our first candidate for president was John C. Fremont, who lost to Buchanan. The next candidate was Abraham Lincoln, who switched from the Whig Party and became a Republican. Basically, the Republican was formed because the Democrats wanted to extend slavery into Kansas and Nebraska. The Civil war was fought between the Democrats and the Grand Army of the Republic. After the Civil War, the Republicans started calling themselves the GOP (Grand Old Party) as a way of connecting the Republicans to the Grand Army of the Republic. Where were you indoctrinated into Marxism that you know nothing of history.

          • Posted By: abbankhead @ 10/25/2008 11:25:11 PM

            I am not sure this is the true reason the GOP was formed. Lincoln's choice to free the slaves was not because he saw something wrong with slavery but because the party felt they needed to do that for political reasons. If that was such a good thing, what happened in TX and the freedom of the slaves there? They didn't know for 2-3 years later. I am just trying to understand the whole thing.

    • Posted By: JPAL @ 10/25/2008 7:22:05 PM

      I lived in Ketchikan for 3 years, 1993-1996, and only had to use the airport once. I have to admit that I loved the idea of taking the ferry to the airport but I can certainly understand the need for weekly travelers to have a quicker way in and out of the town. That being said, I've read several logical ways to pay for the bridge just in the 10 mins I took reading these posts. How about a combination of Alaska tax dollars, a lower dividend check (for one or two years, I know, god forbid), local business contributions (National Bank of Alaska for one), tourism dollars and all that "end of the year fallout $$" to get the bridge built. No one is going to fund this project alone so stop complainig and get it done! Ever heard of compromise? Good luck Ketchikan!

  • Posted By: Mad_Taxpayer @ 10/25/2008 7:08:30 PM

    The economy is in shambles and a town of 14,000 should get a bridge to an airport in the middle of nowhere? If Alaska needs the bridge let them build it not me. Use some of thier oil/NG revenue and not my taxpayer $$.

    • Posted By: akresident @ 10/25/2008 9:25:49 PM

      the economy is in shambles because of your choices of who is in the white house not just the president but all of the senate and house alaska has but two electoral votes so don't blame us for the economy being in a shambles and I will gladly give back your tax dollars when you and the IRS give mine back we pay all of the taxes you do plus fuel surcharges, and since i live in juneau which is the capital of this great state when an avalanche took out our supply line for our electricity from snettisham our electric bills went from 80-100 dollars a month to 4-700 dollars a month pay that on top of your taxes every month A gallon of milf is $4 here but as much as $12 in other places do not pretend it is our fault for the state of the economy. And for welfare there are fewer people on welfare in the state than there are in most cities down south.

      • Posted By: Mad_Taxpayer @ 10/25/2008 10:03:04 PM

        I don't think my post blames anyone in Alaska, the white house, or anyone period for the state of the economy. My statement is that there are much better ways to spend $400 million than a bridge to bumblefluck. By the way, gallon of MILF? LOL

        • Posted By: akresident @ 10/26/2008 4:41:44 AM

          It's milk, is that the only thing you can pick on. Oh ya and it's Gravina not bumblefritz or whatever.

  • Posted By: GeneJB45 @ 10/26/2008 2:22:52 AM

    comment left by dmitri @ 10/26/2008 2:04:40 AM you stated about California paying more than most states and then went on to talk about Red and Blue states. The last time we equated colors to our states it was the Blue and the Gray states and we were in a Civil War! I for one am sick of the high and mighty attitude of some Californians who think they are better than the rest of the country!!! If you don't want to be part of the greater whole that makes up this country then move!!! Then again a major earthquake, mudslide, or fire hits and you're out looking for those same government entitlements paid by the rest of the country too! Get your head out of the clouds or is it your rear and get real!!!!

    • Posted By: dmitri @ 10/26/2008 4:21:04 AM

      First of all, I am not a Californian (in fact, Californians get on my nerves sometimes, too). My point was simly that it is ironic that Alaskans, who highly tout independence, would be looking to DC to pay for something like this, when the state is awash in cash. And that people who are always being accused of seeking "handouts" (that would be those nasty liberal Californias that get on both our nerves) actually pay far more in taxes than the state and its inhabitants receive in return.

      I also don't recall suggesting I wanted California to leave the union (as a non-Californian, that would really be against my self-interest, since I get some of their tax money). In fact, I believe it is Gov. Palin's husband who has been "palling around with successionists".

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/25/2008 5:30:55 PM

    People on these bogs are fond of saying that the current economic meltdown was caused by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac underwriting bad mortgages. While Fannie and Freddie obviously are guilty of writing bad mortgages, and worse, guilty of lobbying Congress to allow them to do so with impunity, their actions are just a small piece of the puzzle when it comes to determining who (or what) caused the financial crisis we face today.

    In 1929 the stock market crash caused the banks to fail, because the banks were in bed with the stock market. Back then, banks owned investment houses, so when the stock market fell, the banks fell too. This triggered the Great Depression. So in 1933 the Congress wrote laws that regulated banking, making it illegal for banks to own investment companies, mortgage guaranty companies or insurance companies. The idea was to keep key industries separated by a fire wall, so that if one industry failed the whole economy would not go down in flames.

    But the Republicans under Bush deregulated the banking industry. Senator Phil Gramm wrote legislation (the Gramm Rudman Act, the Gramm Leach Biley Act, etc.) that stripped away the regulations in the financial and insurance industies. He pushed them through the Republican Congress and they were signed into law by Geo. W. Bush. John McCain voted in favor. Everybody said how great it is to deregulate and create free markets.

    Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch each gave over a million dollars to Senator Gramm's re-election campaign.

    The economic collapse that happened later was a direct result of the deregulation, and here's how: the banks wrote bad mortgages, then bundled the mortgages into investment vehicles that they sold all over the world, and they even got firms like AIG to insure the investments. It was all a house of cards.

    If there had been no deregulation, sure we would have had a bunch of bad mortgages, and the mortgage guaranty and real estate industries would have suffered, but there would not have been a global financial meltdown, since the problem would have been contained in one sector of the economy. You can thank Geo W. Bush, Sen. Phil Gramm and Sen John McCain for the meltdown, since they were strong proponents of deregulation.

    Furthermore, although Fannie and Freddie are now holding the bulk of these bad mortgages, Fannie and Freddie did not originally write most of these mortgages. They bought them after the fact, bundled by banks/investment companies. Fannie and Freddie got screwed by the Wall Street fat cats. And so did you, if you pay taxes.

    What is Phil Gramm doing today? He works as a lobbyist in Washington, trying to make it legal for the Swiss bank he represents to sell Death Bonds in the United States. Nice guy, Phil Gramm. Incidentally, John McCain has said that he wants to appoint Phil Gramm as Treasury Secretary. Some people just can't learn from their mistakes.

    • Posted By: Beargirl @ 10/25/2008 5:51:57 PM

      Do you have a lisp or do you think you have to post the same propaganda several times because you are insececure?

      By the way Mr. Vote Now, is ACORN paying you, or are you just a cool aide drinker?

      • Posted By: ChiChocko @ 10/26/2008 4:08:54 AM

        Pres. Clinton signed it in to Law

  • Posted By: Ron406 @ 10/26/2008 3:53:21 AM

    NiqueD: By your comments about everyone should be paying their own way...I would have to assume you would not want the interstate highway system that built most of those bridges you are compalining about that need to be fixed.... OK is not exactly on the main line of garden spots for city life. OK has taken WAY more than its share of Federal money when it suited them to do so... This bridge is necessary for safety and last I checked OK was once in the frontier... The only difference is AK is still on the frontier.... IKf you were cutoff from an airport or highway more often than not you would be screaming to high heaven why you had not been helped so you could drive your car or truck to get to a hospital or a place of safety. Your main problem is you see everything in black and white... us versus them.... Remember something... the last time that was the choice we had a civil war....Just because you do not agree with a persons politics does not mean you can vilify others you do not agree with and then bitch when it is also done to you. Their is always three sides to any argument.... yours... theirs and the truth.

  • Posted By: Ed in CT @ 10/26/2008 3:48:18 AM

    Tired of Obama and allhis savage friends?
    I'm so sick of hearing about Obongo this, Obongo that.
    Are you too tired of hearing about the media's new "boy"?
    If so, visit C H l M P O U T . C O M

  • Posted By: todd nadrich @ 10/25/2008 7:22:28 PM

    Shut the airport down, problem solved.

    • Posted By: iluvtherain @ 10/25/2008 7:33:57 PM

      Yes, thanks,closing the airport, that would be so helpful! I live here, and am not in favor of the bridge. The cost is too high, but I am getting so irritated reading all these posts, by people who no absolutely Nothing about Nowhere!

      • Posted By: akresident @ 10/26/2008 3:09:19 AM

        Yes thank you for that, I would love it if the airport was shut down because then when I wanted to see my family Icould just swim from Juneau to Ketchikan, or take my water car. I don't need to visit the pople I love and of course they don't need to come to Juneau and visit me. I love riding the ferry for 18 hours or 3 days if you get the one with all the stops and spending all my time with people that smell is always a good time. I love spending 6 days on the ferry and 1 day with my family. So thank you for your comment. I don't want to be the bearer of bad news but that's a long, long trip I don't think anyone wants t take. Can you imagine the trip to Seattle on the Ferry so that you could receive chemo. I mean forget about my sad little 3 days in good health. I hate the ferry and would not be happy without an airport the alternative is horrifying.

    • Posted By: z4t4 @ 10/25/2008 7:31:23 PM

      What a Novel Idea...NEWSWEEK and 3/5 of the Others on here can't see that....Leave States alone! NEWSWEEK IS A BUCH OF JERKOFF writers TRYING to Bid for that NUMBER ONE BEST SELLER on the OBAMA TIMES list..

      • Posted By: Wolf Wolfman @ 10/25/2008 7:34:20 PM

        I won't be posting here anymore.

  • Posted By: TruthfullyYours @ 10/26/2008 2:57:02 AM

    Wow, another way for the media to highlight an individual slamming Sarah Palin right before elections. Somehow I get the feeling this article is less about a bridge and more about a political agenda.

  • Posted By: marmotyma @ 10/26/2008 2:48:47 AM

    I am from Anchorage, and even I didn't really understand the whole situation. I appreciate hearing a perspective from someone who the situation actually effects. I am beginning to realize that everything I hear concerning politics is often the same as a kindergarten game of telephone, no one hears exactly what the next person said, and if they do, they intentionally try to change it for the next person.

  • Posted By: marmotyma @ 10/26/2008 2:48:02 AM

    I am from Anchorage, and even I didn't really understand the whole situation. I appreciate hearing a perspective from someone who the situation actually effects. I am beginning to realize that everything I hear concerning politics is often the same as a kindergarten game of telephone, no one hears exactly what the next person said, and if they do, they intentionally try to change it for the next person.

  • Posted By: ChiChocko @ 10/26/2008 2:28:54 AM

    To the person saying Ketchikan need a baggage handling system..Wait for Hussien to be elected and becomes the first democrat *Herbert Hover* You will see signs that say CCC and NRA and WPA (thats short for Whistle, Piss, and Argure) Eight guys leaning on shovel handles watching 2 do the work.. The WPA will be responsible for you baggage system, and if your lucky it may work as good as the one at DIA. In Kenyan language thats $ spreading the Wealth around $ Hussein will hold class's on "How to balance the Bags on you head while walking from the Ferry to the airport. Thats called from the "Bottom UP Economy" All you have to do is look South to MMMX and Prosperity flourishes, They just want to come to LAX just to spend that
    bottem up money. When on a Geological survey I found a Volcanic Pipe near your area. Get a bridge and I will come up and we can open it up. How's that for Bottom Up? We can borrow some of Hussein CCC workers to man the shovels. While we assume the WPA rolls.

    • Posted By: firetheprincipal @ 10/26/2008 2:41:07 AM

      (CNN) -- Vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin likes to portray herself as an average American working mother.
      But how many typical moms get $150,000 worth of merchandise from stylish stores and have strangers pay for it?

      This week's revelation about the purchases was just one more surprise in the fast rise and apparent fall of the Republican Party's sudden superstar.

      Remember, it was only two months ago that Palin was just the popular governor of Alaska, still an obscure figure in American politics. That changed in late August when John McCain chose her as his running mate.

      Within days, she was generating the biggest excitement the McCain campaign had ever enjoyed, captivating the Republican Party, swelling the crowds at its rallies and drawing media coverage that overshadowed the Democrats.

      One McCain advisor told me then that one of the practical problems she discovered as she criss-crossed the country was that she didn't bring enough clothes.

      It seems her family didn't have enough clothes either, because suddenly there was some serious shopping.

      A single visit to the fashionable department store Neiman Marcus cost more than $75,000, but that was only half of the total. The bills ultimately went to the Republican Party, which means that although they probably didn't know it, party donors paid for them.

      Palin's problems go beyond clothes, though, to her very candidacy. In recent days, prominent Republicans, from former Secretary of State Colin Powell to Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan, have publicly criticized her lack of experience.

      Ordinary Americans agree. An NBC/Wall Street Journal poll found that in early September, when Palin was just starting out as a candidate, 47 percent of voters had a positive opinion of her, compared to 27 percent who felt negatively.

      Now 47 percent have negative feelings, compared with 38 percent who feel positively.

      And the new poll found that concern about Palin's qualifications is voters' top concern about McCain, ahead of every other issue in the election.

      Voting day is less than two weeks away and most polls suggest that Barack Obama is headed for victory. The surprise is that Palin went from being McCain's best asset to his biggest problem. And the Republicans don't have much time, or an obvious way, to fix it.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse