Stomping Through A Medical Minefield

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: nooogetta @ 10/30/2008 12:09:31 PM

    Paul Offit says ???Since the late 1990s, many studies have shown that the rates of autism are the same in vaccinated and unvaccinated children.??? That???s interesting, because a great many parents have been screaming for years to have that study done, but the CDC has been saying there aren???t enough unvaccinated people to do it.

    Mr. Offit???s given you his anecdotal stories about the crazy parents who will stop at nothing when it comes to silencing those who don???t agree with them, even going so far as to threaten Mr. Offit with death. Well here???s a story about the crazy pro-vaccination zealots who???ll stop at nothing to silence those who disagree with them. Today Show editors write ???What do you think? Is there room for discussion????

    I wouldn???t think so, but then I was threatened with arrest when I was standing with my husband outside of an Autism Speaks benefit concert, politely asking people if they would like a flyer with some factual information about vaccine safety. When I refused to leave the public sidewalk, two Cleveland police cars came, summoned there at the request of the benefit organizers. The chief of police was eventually called and he told me that I was within my rights to be on a public sidewalk disseminating information???not something that I needed to be told but the thugs who refuse to acknowledge the damage that???s been done by this vaccine program were unaware of it and apparently they are pretty used to getting their way.

    I???ve been lied to and about by the Cleveland chapter president of Autism Speaks, who denied publicly that an arrest attempt was made even though witnesses were present. I???ve been banned from political chat rooms simply for saying the word ???thimerosal???. I???ve been told by countless nameless faceless people who???ve all profitted from the administration of flu vaccines that vaccines are safe now because the mercury???s been removed, which is a lie as anyone can see simply by looking at the FDA???s website. And so that is why, when I asked for information from the CDC regarding the percentage of flu vaccines being administered with the same old toxic levels of mercury in them, I wanted to know who was giving me that information. Although they asked for my name, no one at the CDC phone lines will give out their names because, as they will tell you, ???there are crazy people out there.??? It???s not as though it matters much though. No one with the CDC is ever able to give out any real nformation about anything.

    No one there can be held accountable for a thing, just as no one with the pharmaceutical companies can be held accountable.

    I???ve yet to receive any death threats from anyone. But then, the vaccine patent holders have the government health officials, the pharmaceutical companies, and the main stream media behind them, so I guess I???m not too surprised that they???re willing to draw the line at SOME thuggish behavior.

    Robin Nemeth

  • Posted By: badshots @ 10/30/2008 11:55:40 AM

    I have heard Dr. Offit's claim of threats for many years. I believe his claims of threats are exaggerated as his claims that tens of thousands of vaccines that could be handled at one time or that there is scientific research that proves vaccines are safe.
    Vaccine injuried children and their parents are the victims of Dr. Offit's attacks and the policies he promotes.
    When my child has been sick and crying in the middle of the night I have often wondered if the people who knowingly did this to him can sleep at night. Thank you, Mrs. Offit I won't have to wonder anymore.
    Is the guilt your husband does not have keeping you awake?

  • Posted By: concerned scientist @ 10/29/2008 9:16:24 PM

    We shouldn't confuse scientific fact with belief. The scientific method is as follows: make an observation; form a hypothesis (explanation); if your hypothesis is true, what is then true about the observation; test the hypothesis and analyze results. All of the hysteria surrounding autism hits the first three, but ignores the step of proof. You are doing a disservice to your children believing in something that has not been proven. Either test and prove the relationship or find out what actually does cause autism so it can be treated/prevented.

    • Posted By: sdtech @ 10/29/2008 9:56:30 PM

      You have the proverbial cart in front of the horse. The first three steps and the fourth, proof of safety, are yet to be done. Four million children are born each year in the US and are at risk of thimerosal and or other vaccination injury. Mercury was banned for use in paint by the USEPA in 1990. And yet still there are trillions of atoms of mercury, a known neurotoxin, injected in the bloodsteams of children and pregnant women as *trace* levels of thimerosal, 25 nanograms per 0.5ml of vaccine. The doctors, nurses, scientists, and federal watchdog agencies are the ones doing a disservice to our children. The scientific fact of safety of mercury in vaccines has not been proven. These children are the guinea pigs.

      • Posted By: concerned scientist @ 10/29/2008 10:26:25 PM

        The scientific method at work: Your observation is that kids of the same age as those who need vaccinations are of the age that autism get diagnosed. Your hypothesis is that vaccinations cause autism. You then stop vaccinating children without any testing and scientific proof. Real life effects of yours and other adults' actions: infants and children die of measles and pertussis (fact). Don't let anger trump logic.

        • Posted By: sdtech @ 10/30/2008 3:29:04 AM

          This discussion is about mercury in shots. It is not about MMR shots. The current scientific proof is that mercury is a neurotoxin. It kills brain cells. That proof screams a hypothesis that it is harmful to pregnant women and children when put into their bloodstreams. The analysis of data in the first half of the Verstraeten study of over 100,000 kids found a correlation. Linear regression of that data gives increasing risk of autism and other neurological disorders with increasing dosage of Thimerosal. And yet mercury is still in vaccines as Thimerosal. Parents have a right to know that it is in flu vaccines. They also have a right to ask for mercury free vaccines.

  • Posted By: mpasquini @ 10/26/2008 5:21:57 PM

    The heart of the matter is that GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT MANDATE VACCINES. Government has no right to say people have to put something in their bodies, NO MATTER WHAT.

    In addition, kudos to the mainstream media for setting up a straw man of a minority of those who write death threats. What is this exact percentage of the whole, who mostly just passionately oppose vaccines?

    Last, it will ALWAYS be a common sense matter that mercury should not be injected into an infant, bypassing the skin barrier.

    • Posted By: emilyinfresno @ 10/29/2008 11:09:57 PM

      I agree that the government shouldn't mandate vaccines regardless of their safety. However, schools and daycares should be able to bar unvaccinated individuals as they are a threat to the rest of the children. I think that's fair.

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 5:33:37 PM

      I guess that would be OK with me IF the government were not also expected to pay for health care , special education and long term care for all the people who would be ill and disabled from vaccine preventable diseases. I don't want my child going to school with an unvaccinated kid, even though she has had her shots. We all know there are varying degrees of immunity and that immunity wanes over time. I don't want her dying from meningitis at age 11 - like one of my students!! becase we planned the booster shot at age 12. I don't want my first grandchild to be born dead because a unvaccinated kid gave my pregant daugher rubella. Unvaccinated people are a menance to society. Go live in a colony together and do not ever come into normal society.. none of those little trips to Switzerland that brought measles to 14 unrelated kids (plus a few siblings) in LA last year.

  • Posted By: sdtech @ 10/26/2008 2:53:13 AM

    Ms. Clark:

    Please reconsider your criticism of those families that question vaccine safety and have a healthy fear of mercury, one of the most toxic elements in our universe.

    As to your flat earth comment, please remember that Galileo was tried and persecuted for helping to put that to rest over 400 years ago. He is a considered by some to be the father of modern science with his approach of question, observe, measure, and prove.

    And today we question the role of vaccines in autism, and we observe that Thimerosal goes into bloodstreams of children and pregnant women, and we have proof that mercury is a neurotoxin (it destroys brain tissue), and we have the measurement in Thimerosal of 49 percent mercury by weight. Thus each person on this nearly round earth has the right to know about and question its use in vaccines. It has not been proven safe.

    And over this weekend while we post on this site, there will be 140 children diagnosed with autism based on the 1 in 150 statistics given by CDC. So it is an issue of both good science and moral duty that we question and consider all evidence of harm and try to stop this horrendous epidemic on our most precious resource our children.

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 5:42:51 PM

      Why do you not care about the horrendous epidemics like flu, polio, diptheria and pertissis (whooping cough). Unlike th eflu of today, teh Spanish Flu pandemic, worldwide, killed mostly healthy young adults. Mercury has not been in pediatric vaccines for YEARS so it is long past time to update your arguments. Instead of being pranoid about the fear that has never been proven (despite huge amounts of research) re: vaccine-related autism; look at the very real and very proven epidemics that caused millions of childhood deaths before vaccines were developed.

    • Posted By: colinml @ 10/26/2008 7:39:01 PM

      But Galileo had proof.

      • Posted By: sdtech @ 10/27/2008 3:54:19 AM

        Please read Geier and Geier, Response to Comments by JR Mann, Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2003 at http://www.ebmonline.org/cgi/reprint/228/9/993.pdf .

  • Posted By: jafaires@hotmail.com @ 10/26/2008 5:36:54 PM

    I have three boys. My oldest son is autistic. I hold a bachelor's degree in Marine Biology. I took care of many babies and young children for many years before I became a mother. I say this to let you know that I knew what normal development looked like. The only major difference in what I did while pregnant or raising my sons is how I had them vaccinated. My oldest was vaccinated according to schedule. After his sixth month set of vaccines, I began to notice a decline in his development, he was no longer truly progressing. By eleven months he was participating in our district's Early Intervention program. Eight years later, he's at the level of a two year old. As it is, he only progressed from six months to two years developmentally through two years of ABA therapy. With his brothers, I delayed all vaccinations until they were 18 months old and developing on target. Then I let the doctor give them one vaccination at a time until they had had one of each without a reaction. Then I let them get back on the recommended schedule. By the time they hit Pre School, there were all caught up with the kids who had been immunized from birth. From what I have seen in the autism community, it is a MIRACLE that neither of my other boys are autistic. As it is, not to be bragging, it's just the truth, my non-autistic sons are at least a year ahead of their peers in school. My autistic son is clever in his own ways (you should see him problem solve to get something he wants). Point is that I don't think I just got genetically lucky, that I sincerely believe that my autistic son became that way because his immune system couldn't handle the onslaught. As for vaccinations being around for a long time without so much autism, well, back then kids weren't given as many nor as young. Children get the Hepatitis B vaccine within an hour from birth! Also, children who may have been autistic weren't classified as such, only as mentally retarded and shunted off to asylums to live. Until doctors can conclusively point to what causes autism, I don't know how they can be so confident to rule vaccinations out. I can't wait until the scientific community develops a genetic screening for autism and I can find out if all my boys or just the one carry the autism gene(s). I'd also like to know if any studies are being done with families like mine that have managed to avoid a repeat of autism.

    • Posted By: 9mmshort @ 10/26/2008 6:14:21 PM

      You claim an "avoidance of autism" but that is only in your own mind. Millions of kids get the vaccines and progress just the way your kids did. There has been no thermosil in CA for over ten years and the autism rate keeps climbing. And, all of the vaccines a child gets by the age of five contain less particulates over all that used to be in one polio vaccine. People cannot accept that autism rears its ugly head at the same stage of life that kids are receiving vaccines.What exactly do you do as a marine biologist? Have you ever had your mercury level checked? Let me take a wild guess on your oldest son. Light to red hair, blue eyes, pale to light complexion? And your point about the percentage of risk is totally off base. Your kids chances of being autistic WAS the same as everyone else's. ( 1 in 150) You say this is your opinion?? That's just what it is. And that's if they do have the vaccinations. And you can't compare that to the chances of getting a desease which you claim will put them in the hospital. These deseases kill. We have become complacent in that the medical establishment that all these people blame have made huge leapsin keeping people healthy.

      • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 5:28:27 PM

        I personally have had close to 50 immunizations, many of them for foreign travel. I had 12 measles and combo measles/mups rubella shots as a kid growing up in NY in the 1960's. I have my original vaccine record and we got a measles shot nearly every year. I did not know one single kid with autism and only a few with any form of mental retardation.. and even one of those was anethesia reaction during a surgery. Vaccines were actually LESS safe when we were growing up- live virus polio vaccine on a sugar cube, the DTaP was not yet the safer acellular type. Kids today actually get fewr shots than in the 1960's and 1970's. In my work as a pedi nurse I see kids coming from Mexico and Central America who have had 8, 10 or 12 live polio shots, live bacteria TB vaccination (BCG) and measles shots starting at age 9 or 10 mos yet they have a very, very low rate of autism.So how did we all turn out OK? (becasue .. autism is not caused by having a lot of shots!)

      • Posted By: jafaires@hotmail.com @ 10/26/2008 7:03:42 PM

        I'm going to copy my reply to another response because it addresses your issues too. My point about being a marine biologist was that I am knowledgeable about scientific processes, how the body functions, etc. I'm not an English major with no clue about the body and how it works. This will also be my last post as I need to get back to my son.

        If you read my post you would understand that I do not blame thermisol. I believe that children with autism have problems with their immune systems or have immature immune systems. When they are overwhelmed (Hep B, Diptheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Hib, Polio, Rotavirus, and Pneumococcal) with an onslaught of antibodies, these children prone to autism do not react as "normal" children do. As for recreational drug use, well, that's not my case. I, nor my husband, my parents or in-laws (whether or not you believe me), ever did recreational drugs, smoked or drank alcohol. So, that theory does not hold water in my case, or in the case of many other families I know. As for each of my sons having the same chance (1 in 150) as any other child, that is not entirely true. There is a genetic component. I know many families with multiple children with autism. So, they do have a higher chance than any other kid. If you look at the statistics, children in general have a 1 in 150 chance of being autistic. If you are a boy, your chances are actually 1 in 66. Once you have 1 autistic child the chances of a second depending on what you read can be anywhere from 3-8 percent, to up to 75 percent. Kennedy Krieger says its 30 percent. Some people think maternal and paternal age are a factor-the older the higher the chances for autism. In our case that wasn't the factor, my husband was 21 and I was 23 when I got pregnant. So, my second and third sons had at least a 3% (more likely 30% but maybe 75%) chance of being autistic compared to a 0.00017% chance of getting the measles. So delaying vaccinations was a smart choice for my sons. Evaluate your risk and make an informed decision.

        • Posted By: rpearlston @ 10/26/2008 8:52:58 PM

          You've made your point all right - but the point that you made is about breastfeeding instead of bottle feeding.

  • Posted By: risitodeplata @ 10/26/2008 5:58:13 PM

    The last poster calculations look convincing, but if people started opting out of vaccines the amount of kids who caught the diseases would go up greatly. This would completly change the amount of kids who get the diseases. Also I am sure this poster isn't old enough to remember as very few are what happened before routine vaccinations. The amount of sick childen and the amount who DIED. I have 6 kids all who have been vaccinated on schedule. Just doing my family geneology I note that in the early 1900 and 1800's virtually every family had atleast 1 or more children who died before 5 and most of these were before 1 year old. Why because there were no vaccinations. It is amazing when you look at the amount of infants who died in previous generations. Vaccinations are an all or nothing proposition. If not enough kids get them it won't stop large outbreaks. The few who get autism even if it is related are a small percent compared to the amount who used to die or have lifelong disabilities from the diseases they caught.

    • Posted By: jafaires@hotmail.com @ 10/26/2008 6:27:50 PM

      As I stated before, I don't think we should totally avoid vaccinations. The ideal situation would be if they could screen for autism before pumping kids full of antibodies. Those at risk (1 in 150 - higher if you're a boy, lower if you are a girl) could then begin vaccinations at a later date. I realize that many young children did die of disease back in the early 1900s and 1800s, but that was also before the days of good hygiene and understanding of how diseases were spread, antibiotics and other medical inventions. Right now UNICEF and partners have established Global Handwashing Day (October 15th) to teach everyone, especially children in developing nations, the importance of washing their hands with soap and water. "According to the official site turning handwashing with soap before eating and after using the toilet into an ingrained habit was projected to save more lives than any single vaccine or medical intervention, cutting deaths from diarrhea by almost half and deaths from acute respiratory infections by one-quarter." Who knows how many other diseases it will help to reduce also? Even though none of my friends have suffered from not being vaccinated, I do know several adults, including my friends parents, who have suffered from contracting polio. Although physically disabled, they can still provide for themselves and sustain families.

      • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 5:18:18 PM

        Unfortunately, autism symptoms do not show up until at least 6 mos and often around 12-18 mos. By then the child has been exposed to the disease. Handwashing does not help with repiratory secretion disease such as pertussis. Adult caregivers are the reservoirs of disease, which kills and disables babies. Many viral disease have a prodromoal phase wherein one is highly contagious but has not yet started to feel symptoms, so isolating 'sick' people also is not practivcle. Would you keep your child away from all humans except vaccinated parents and siblings until age 18 mos? Several posters on this thread also said their child started autistic symtoms at age 2.

  • Posted By: jesusluvme @ 10/26/2008 6:23:13 PM

    For those of you who believe that vaccines and mercury cause autism - how do you then explain the fact that autism is on the rise when mercury/thimerosol has NOT been in vaccines in 10 years? It looks as though you are searching for a scapegoat to explain autism occurring in your children. Did it ever occur to any of you that previous recreational drug use could be a cause of the rise in autism? Autism rates have risen steadily since the 60s and MANY, if not most, of us experimented in our teen years with recreational drugs. I believe there is a plausible connection between past drug use and the rise in autism. The genetic effects/changes from drugs can be long-term in sperm and eggs. It only stands to reason that this is a distinct possible cause for the rise in autism.

    • Posted By: jafaires@hotmail.com @ 10/26/2008 6:50:53 PM

      If you read my post you would understand that I do not blame thermisol. I believe that children with autism have problems with their immune systems or have immature immune systems. When they are overwhelmed (Hep B, Diptheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Hib, Polio, Rotavirus, and Pneumococcal) with an onslaught of antibodies, these children prone to autism do not react as "normal" children do. As for recreational drug use, well, that's not my case. I, nor my husband, my parents or in-laws (whether or not you believe me), ever did recreational drugs, smoked or drank alcohol. So, that theory does not hold water in my case, or in the case of many other families I know. As for each of my sons having the same chance (1 in 150) as any other child, that is not entirely true. There is a genetic component. I know many families with multiple children with autism. So, they do have a higher chance than any other kid. If you look at the statistics, children in general have a 1 in 150 chance of being autistic. If you are a boy, your chances are actually 1 in 66. Once you have 1 autistic child the chances of a second depending on what you read can be anywhere from 3-8 percent, to up to 75 percent. Kennedy Krieger says its 30 percent. Some people think maternal and paternal age are a factor-the older the higher the chances for autism. In our case that wasn't the factor, my husband was 21 and I was 23 when I got pregnant. So, my second and third sons had at least a 3% (more likely 30% but maybe 75%) chance of being autistic compared to a 0.00017% chance of getting the measles. So delaying vaccinations was a smart choice for my sons. Evaluate your risk and make an informed decision.

      • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 5:12:01 PM

        And why is it that your children have such a low chance of getting measles? Because millions of other parents had their kids vaccinated! So you could take advantage of them. I guess it is OK for those parents to (in your opinion) risk their children developing autism, in order to protect your kids from measles? hmmm

    • Posted By: blogster99 @ 10/26/2008 8:30:47 PM

      Please state your source that no mercury is in any in vaccines. Im not riding your propaganda driven gravy train until you lay the facts out on the table. We all have a very big table waiting for your documented proof or links verifying anything in regards to this issue. Oh.. .BTW... is it in flu shots that are being marketed to even children now every year?

      • Posted By: miraidebbie @ 10/27/2008 3:01:08 AM

        Only flu vaccines that come in multidose vials contain mercury as a preservative.

      • Posted By: dls1975 @ 10/26/2008 10:56:31 PM

        Since 2001, with the exception of some influenza (flu) vaccines, thimerosal is not used as a preservative in routinely recommended childhood vaccines. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal.htm
        FYI: The flu vaccine needs to be given every year because it mutates (unlike other viruses) and therefore each years vaccine needs to cover for the predicted strain.

  • Posted By: Eosine @ 10/26/2008 11:44:30 PM

    The people who claim vaccines cause autism need to explain why 4x more boys get it than girls. Look to genetics. Boys only get one x chromosome. If that x chromosome doesn't have other genes to dominate over the "autism" genes (the way girls do with their other x chromosome), then they get genes expressed that lead to a complex matrix of anomalies that lead to autism. This happens whether they get vaccinated or not. Stopping vaccines will never stop autism. Let's get on with the real issues and stop villifying the people that SAVE LIVES with preventative measures.

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 5:05:35 PM

      Great post! Aspberger's is especially linked to genetics. Perhaps there is a bad combo of genetics and envrio hazards but when you think of how many children used to die every year from vaccine-preventable diseases, it is a miracle of modern medicine we can now expect our kids to reach adulthood- unlike my mom who saw childhood friends die or be crippled from polio. Sad thing is, nonvaccinating parents get a free hide from the fact over 90% of other kids are immunized. That creates a "herd immunity" that limits th outbreaks so that the unvaccinated kids stay somewhat safe- because other, more responsible parents were willing to take the very small risk for the much greater benefit

  • Posted By: emilys @ 10/27/2008 12:36:51 AM

    I wonder why all the people out there who vaccinate their kids are worried about the small few who may choose not to on the ???recommended??? schedule? If everyone that wants to start vaccinating their child as infant does so, then great, you are covered; you do not have a thing to worry about. At this point, the only children at risk of measles and such are the ones whose parents choose to delay their schedule. So what do you have to fear?

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 4:59:23 PM

      Because there is always a segment of the population that can't be vaccinated: babies under 2 mos of age, those on chemotherapy or with other health conditions (ie, HIV and other immune issues can't get live vaccines). Others who were vaccinated may not have gotten a full respsone. Those people need to be protected! In fact babies under 2 mos of age are the most likely to die from pertussis (whooping cough) Also, there is a economic cost to society. When a baby with pertussis or meningitis suffers lifelong brain damage, who picks up the cost of special education and lifelong special care? The parents expenditures are only a small part. It is expensive to trace and control outbreaks of communicable diesease, like happened in LA from a nonvaccinating family who brought measles here from Switzerland and infected a dozen other kids. A whooping cough outbreak shut down a school in the East Bay (CA) last spring. Weren't those families affected?

  • Posted By: pcuce @ 10/28/2008 3:15:50 PM

    Dr. Offit's point of view is not unbiased, furthermore he thinks there is no adverse effects concerning vaccines at all, simple logic says otherwise, and finally why the rise in not only autism, but juvenile diabetes, and more, what has changed in the last 30 years, answer: 15 times the vaccines required, at a much earlier age because in their own words "it is easier for the medical profession" In my humble opinion they have not conclusively made a case for absolute safety, and the American public does not trust their government over the obscene profits at stake, to make a decision that truly serves the public, and I for one can not blame them.

  • Posted By: gottaluvit58 @ 10/27/2008 12:46:01 AM

    I haven't read the book, but unless the author is proposing some theories, I don't see the point. Likewise, if the parents are all stuck on the vaccination theory, I think they are doing themselves a big disservice. The MMR vaccine timing coincides with the introduction of solid foods. We know that foods can have drug-like properties. The number of molecules that enter the bloodstream from food far outnumbers those from vaccinations. Has anyone investigated wheat gluten? This is ubiquitous in bakery products. Why is it in our food? Isn't this the same substance that made many pets ill last year? What are the health effects from this chemical? These are the kinds of things we should be focusing on. Wasting all of this time worrying about vaccines, which have such proven benefits, is very perplexing.

    The real failing though is that everyone in society is expected to be vaccinated but there is absolutely no education about vaccinations in schools. Not until I took a course in immunology did I understand them. I don't think any parent should have their children vaccinated unless they understand how the immune system and vaccinations work. Then they will embrace them.

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 3:06:51 PM

      No, wheat gluten is not what made pets sick. It was the contamination of perfectly halthy wheat gluten with a chemical called melamine, a nitrogen-based byproduct of plastic manufacture. It is (unethically) added to foods to make the protein content appear higher since those tests measure nitrogen content. You are also quite wrong about the timing of intro of solid foods and MMR vaccine. Intro of solid foods to infants is 4-6 mos old- usually a rice based cereal and bananas followed by other grains (esp barley) and other fruits (apples, peaches). The MMR vaccine is not licensed for use in the US until minimum age 1 year and recommended is 15 mos. Some practitienrs give it at 18 mos since here is a lower incidence of measles, mumps and rubella versus other dieases, which vaccines are given prioirity at the 12-15 month range. Some people do have a true allergy to wheat gluten and follow a wehat-free diet but the majority of people of Western European descent have no trouble with it.

  • Posted By: useyournoggin @ 10/27/2008 8:29:35 AM

    Get away from autism for a minute and look at the health of our kids in general. With all of the protection from disease that our kids are offered via vaccination AND considering the fact that we spend more money, per capita, on healthcare than any other country in the world, we should have the HEALTHIEST kids in the world. Would you expect anything less from our amazing doctors? Yet just this year we sank even further and the World Health Organization ranked the U.S. 29th in infant mortality. Therefore, if you want your newborn child to increase the chance they will survive past his/her first birthday you can choose 28 other countries to live in and have a greater chance. Amazing. We are doing something to our babies that is hurting them more than helping them. Wait, I know, it is putting them to sleep on their bellies. Dumb, dumb parent. If you want to improve cardiovascular function you need to STRESS the heart, if you want bones to be stronger you need to STRESS them with weight bearing exercise, if you want to improve respiratory function you need to STRESS the lungs to watch them improve. The same holds true for the immune system. If you want your kids to be healthier you need to stress the immune system and let them get sick. Unfortunately common sense in health care is not that common. Silly doctors, when you start keeping our kids healthy with your methods that is when I will subject my kids to your "treatments."

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 2:17:32 PM

      Your comments make some good points. We do think that newly increased asthma rates may be linked to having a too CLEAN early environment that did not challenge the immune system sufficiently in infancy. However there is one deadly problem with your theory- when we "stress" the child with natural disease, there is no way for the parent to limit the stress to a healthy but nondeadly level. Pertussis kills babies. Tetanus kills. Varicella meningitis causes permanent brain damage. Polio kills and cripples. How do you know your kid is going to have a nice mild case of chickenpox and not a horrible case that results in permanent brain damage from viral meningitis? How do you know your child will not acquire polio from a recent immigrant, or from the wild (common in the 1950's) and be left with just a little limp instad of an iron lung? Will he get pertussis at age 8 and get over it after three months of no sleep and puking up all his food, or will he get it at age 8 weeks- and die? It is like playing Russian Roulette with your child's life. Vaccines, on the other hand, ARE a controlled way to stress- or provoke- the immune repsonse. That is exactly how they are designed; to provoke a repsonse in a controlled and limited way, unlike the ravages of uncontrolled natural diesease.

  • Posted By: realistically.minded @ 10/27/2008 11:28:38 AM

    This is a very heart-breaking and intriguing topic, one that I, admittedly, don't know much about. Has anyone ever seen studies done on populations of children whose cultures/families don't use any sort of medicine (i.e. Christian Scientists)? What is the autism (suspected or confirmed) incidence rate in these communities?

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 2:05:01 PM

      There has been some research done, but often these same families do not send their children to public schools (often home-school) and do not go to the standard Western-medicine pediatric visits and specialists, so the children go unrecognized as having autism. They are just cared for quietly at home. They stay in the community and not the outside world where symptoms would be obvious. It is not until the child goes into the public school system or has an active, knowledgeable pediatrician that a child is evaluated for autism. Also, with evidence that autism has a genetic compenent (esp in Aspbergers'), looking at small, closely related (inter-marrying) population may not offer much evidence as they may be a group that does not share the gene. It is interesting to note outbreaks of measles and even polio among unvaccinated Mennonite populations in the mid west.

  • Posted By: gemmahb @ 10/27/2008 11:52:59 AM

    okay i thought i would let you know about what happened in England in an area known as Kirklees i forfet the proper spelling but it is where my sister lives. in the year 1999 a new vaccine for measles mumps and rubella came on the market and kirklees was the first area to use it. that year my sisters son (1of 4 in the end) was one of the first to recieve it. that year autism rose over 300% for that area and the vaccine was imediatly removed from the market and that child 1 of 4 sons was the only one to get autism. it was removed due to the high levels of mercury.

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 1:59:42 PM

      If you start with a small group, then only a few extra cases looks like a 300% rise. It's like saying average life expectancy is 50 years because one subject died a week after birth and one lived to 100. Publicity about autism may have simply lead country practitioners and previously unaware parents to have their patients/children assessed and diagnosed. In fact when we go back to state mental hospitals we can see many adults who, if diagnosed today, would have been called autistic children, but in their time were simply labelled "mentally retarded" or mentally ill. What about all the children who were vaccinated and did *not* develop autism? There have been huge studies in the US and britian that have utterly disproven any link between autism and the MMR vaccine. While I am sorry for your sister's difficulty, an anecdote about one family does not weigh against the huge mass of research that has been done on this subject for the last five to ten years.

  • Posted By: liz p @ 10/27/2008 1:12:47 PM

    Forget whether or not vaccination contributes to Autism...Vaccination is a medical treatment. As such, one should be properly informed of the risks and benefits. Since this treatment involves administration of a pharmaceutical product, one should be provided the entire product insert and ample time to research ingredients and adverse events. Only after fully understanding the risks and benefits, as they apply to this particular individual, should administration be performed. Further, in the event more than one product is to be administered, at the same time, not only should every product's information be provided, but also germaine research regarding concommitant administration should be provided; if no safety information is available for concommitant administration,then these products should not be given at the same time! Also, every recipient should be provided a snapshot of the history of the diseases to be prevented, including a graphic of prevalence from the early 1900's to current, percentage of individuals exposed to a disease who would contract the disease if ot vaccinated, percentage of individuals who contract the disease who would likely have negative life-long impact as a result of contracting the disease, the percentage of individuals who cotract the disease and die of said disease, and the percentage of individuals who contract said disease and die of a complication but not the disease itself. People should be informed that the "protection" offered by a vacine is not guaranteed and the percentage of those who are vaccinated who do not acquire immunity, and also that said immunity is transient. Because of the transience of vaccine-mediated immunity, they should be provided with a window of likely immunity. Finally, they should be provided a clear picture of the symptoms of the disease targeted by the vaccine, as well provide the percentage of people who contract the disease then have lifelong immunity for that disease. Then, and only then, is informed consent possible.

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 1:50:53 PM

      Enter Your CommentIt already is Federal law to provide parents with a standardized Vaccine Information Sheet listing the expected benefit and the better known side effects. As to the rest of the information, this sounds like a four part lecture series for medical stduents. As a practical matter, it would be impossible to convey all of this information to every parent at a variety of literacy levels, ability to comprehend, and foreign languages. Do you know how busty pediatric clinics are? Shouls we putr aside seeing sick kids in ordr to spend all the time on an incredible extensive information fest? Keep in mind that the vast majority of kids who get shots suffer no adverse effect at all; and even those who have soem side effect are very mild- swelling, low fever for a day or so (tha tactually just demonstrates the immune repsonse is functioing, so it is a good sign). Parents who are motivated to gain a much higher level of awareness re :persistence of immunity, or lack of adequate immune repsonse have the internet to research on their own. It would be impossible to impose this standard on vaccines- and such a degree of information is not required for any otehr medical treatment, including chemotherapy and surgeries. And BTW- it's a falsehood tha tpeople who contract a disease have lifelong immunity. Consider post-polio syndrome and shingles. Consider that chickenpox disease "lifelong immunity" most likely did not arise from a single infection but was constantly "boosted" by frequent re-exposure throughout the childhood years- which secondary cases were mild enough or asymptomatic enough not to be recognized as chickenpox.. So, it is not surprise that vaccines also have to be boosted!

  • Posted By: garyrose66 @ 10/27/2008 1:53:36 PM

    Those who automatically connect vaccines with onset of autism seem to avoid considering the vast unknown weight of environmental toxins that have strong known impacts on the reproductive systems and neurodevelopment . Take flame retardant chemicals (like PDBE) unused thirty years ago and now ubiquitous, by law. Laws designed to prevent smokers from immolating themselves in bed have resulted in everyone being subjected to exposure to these under-tested chemicals They wrap and swaddle babies from the day they are born, in blankets, cribs, mattresses. They are invisible and are persistent. They accumulate in mothers milk. More facts: On average, dust in California homes contains 10 times the PBDEs found in dust from other states and 200 times the amount in houses in Europe, according to a new study from the Silent Spring Institute. Worse, Californians have twice the level of this fire retardant in their blood as do people in other states. A recent research report by the nonprofit Environmental Working Group showed that American toddlers have, on average, a level of fire retardant in their bodies that is three times higher than that found in their mothers. In dozens of animal studies, these fire retardants also have been shown to harm reproduction and scramble brain development. Studies are underway to determine if PBDEs are contributing to increases in autism, hyperactivity, birth defects, infertility, diabetes and obesity in people. Don't just obsess on vaccines!

    • Posted By: suziweav @ 10/28/2008 1:41:37 PM

      Great post! There are many environmental chemicals to which children are exposed that were not present 25 years ago. Excellent, well researched point.

  • Posted By: garyrose66 @ 10/27/2008 1:36:51 PM

    Those who automatically connect vaccines with onset of autism seem to avoid considering the vast unknown weight of environmental toxins that have strong known impacts on the reproductive systems and neurodevelopment . Take flame retardant chemicals (like PDBE) unused thirty years ago and now ubiquitous, by law. Laws designed to prevent smokers from immolating themselves in bed have resulted in everyone being subjected to exposure to these under-tested chemicals They wrap and swaddle babies from the day they are born, in blankets, cribs, mattresses. They are invisible and are persistent. They accumulate in mothers milk. More facts: On average, dust in California homes contains 10 times the PBDEs found in dust from other states and 200 times the amount in houses in Europe, according to a new study from the Silent Spring Institute. Worse, Californians have twice the level of this fire retardant in their blood as do people in other states. A recent research report by the nonprofit Environmental Working Group showed that American toddlers have, on average, a level of fire retardant in their bodies that is three times higher than that found in their mothers. In dozens of animal studies, these fire retardants also have been shown to harm reproduction and scramble brain development. Studies are underway to determine if PBDEs are contributing to increases in autism, hyperactivity, birth defects, infertility, diabetes and obesity in people. Don't just obsess on vaccines!

  • Posted By: garyrose66 @ 10/27/2008 1:36:33 PM

    Those who automatically connect vaccines with onset of autism seem to avoid considering the vast unknown weight of environmental toxins that have strong known impacts on the reproductive systems and neurodevelopment . Take flame retardant chemicals (like PDBE) unused thirty years ago and now ubiquitous, by law. Laws designed to prevent smokers from immolating themselves in bed have resulted in everyone being subjected to exposure to these under-tested chemicals They wrap and swaddle babies from the day they are born, in blankets, cribs, mattresses. They are invisible and are persistent. They accumulate in mothers milk. More facts: On average, dust in California homes contains 10 times the PBDEs found in dust from other states and 200 times the amount in houses in Europe, according to a new study from the Silent Spring Institute. Worse, Californians have twice the level of this fire retardant in their blood as do people in other states. A recent research report by the nonprofit Environmental Working Group showed that American toddlers have, on average, a level of fire retardant in their bodies that is three times higher than that found in their mothers. In dozens of animal studies, these fire retardants also have been shown to harm reproduction and scramble brain development. Studies are underway to determine if PBDEs are contributing to increases in autism, hyperactivity, birth defects, infertility, diabetes and obesity in people. Don't just obsess on vaccines!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse