The Palin Problem

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: davidkingnj @ 10/26/2008 6:05:14 PM

    The sheer thought that Governor Palin could further her political career makes my stomach turn. Populist and ideological politics are a recipe for disaster! Have we not tasted enough of this for the past eight years?

    Unfortunately, I had strongly considered voting for McCain (pre-Palin) and her nomination as VP just made me lose all interest and hope. I admired McCain for not being the far-right socially conservative politician, and then Sarah Palin happened... I think she happened in a "negative" way for a lot of independent voters, she speaks the same regurgitated garbage that we've heard time and time again from the GOP. In times of crisis, we need qualified folks to run our government, not some far-right GOP stunt woman who repeatedly rambles off topic on major issues. Someone should tell her that abortion bans, installing turrets at the borders, internment camps for gays and lesbians, and positive family values will NOT FIX OUR AILING ECONOMY!

    She may be the single reason that McCain may not win the vote, she is certainly the reason that McCain will not win my vote.

    Obama/Biden 2008

    • Posted By: oliveoyl @ 10/27/2008 1:01:28 AM

      Couldn't agree more - I was on the fence until Palin was brought on board. The threat of having her anywhere near the White House gave Obama my vote. Everyone talks about Palin revitalizing the Republican base - most of them were going to vote for the Republican candidate regardless of the VP pick. No way would they give their vote to a more conservative candidate with little hope of actually winning the White House - they know that's the same as giving Obama votes. All picking Plain did was make votes who were going to vote for McCain anyway happier (temporarily) and encourage just about everyone else to swing to Obama's camp. Ridiculous strategy.

  • Posted By: jcruzing77 @ 10/27/2008 12:50:25 AM

    Discusting, discusting, absolutely discusting reporting - and I am a Hispanic inmigrant from Central America and I'm amazed at the bias of this discusting magazine. I guess that to be a reporter or editor of a magazine like this you need about a "C" average in school and a socialist mentality since you can not make it on your own.

  • Posted By: caraprado @ 10/27/2008 12:14:28 AM

    The Way We Should See McCain and Palin From Now On:
    Maverick Personality Disorder: A New Diagnosis
    http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/10/maverick-personality-disorder.html

  • Posted By: benivarius @ 10/26/2008 7:53:45 PM

    Posted By: HolyRoller @ 10/26/2008 4:02:00 PM
    Comment: Looked at Hussein's Treasurer...It would seem that Obama campaign treasurer Martin Nesbitt has tax liens. As do his companies.....Multiple TAX LIENS....ACORN owes over $500,000 in back taxes....Hussein is a....CROOK and a LIAR....and his supporters are lemmings....about to jump off a cliff.....

    Allah Akbar Comrades...

    NOBAMA!!!

    Ok, does everybody see this? THIS IS WHAT NEEDS TO GO FROM THE REPUBLICAN PARTY! This kind of crap thinking and self-delusion is exactly why our party is losing this election. We have to mount a SMART, LOGICAL response to a challenge, not the mindlessly agressive stance of willful self delusion. This person knows that Obama isn't a Muslim, but still feels the need to imply it to satisfy that lame little inside place that still wishes we were on the grade school playground. We need critically thinking Republicans, not idiots. MODERATE CONSERVATIVES EVERYWHERE, OUR PARTY NEEDS TO RISE ABOVE THIS GARBAGE AND THINK OUR WAY INTO OFFICE!!!!!

    • Posted By: timeshadows @ 10/26/2008 11:37:50 PM

      I applaud you sir. I too believe we all need to rise abouve and put foth our best instaead of our worst.

  • Posted By: LIberal and proud @ 10/26/2008 9:15:51 PM

    You fail ro recognize that should Obama maintain the white house for the next 8 years, that right wing population will unjdoubtedly become even smaller than it is now. THe 17 year olds today will be the 25 year olds in 2008 and they are even less likely to see color, sexual orientation or any of the right wing platforms as anything that remotely speaks to them...case in point, Obama's rise in the year 2008. Ms. Palin represents a faction of a party that is small and shrinking, even if they are loud and angry, they are truly not representative of the population as a whole. In addition, one cannot ignore her nor her husbands history and their association with the anger ridden America hating preacher who wants to secede Alaska from the US and says hell is an iceberg compared to his hatred of the US. Remember, Obama and his campaign have let a lot of this go, they have been treading lightly and not bothered to attack her. But should she even think of running, again, there will be no bars hold and all will be subject to attack including her questionable abuses of power, her cronyism and her fanatical religous beliefs as well as her husbands contempt for the US...No chance she will ever be re-elected governor again...she will nbe mired down in investigations based on her spending as well as her abuse of power. Her political career will be over, but I am sure she will continue to do something with her new found celebrity...talk show host on the Pat Roberts show:)

    • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/26/2008 9:27:46 PM

      Lets see now what Histroy says about that. Carter was a what, oh, a one term president followed by how many terms Republican?

      • Posted By: Nins @ 10/26/2008 11:16:02 PM

        In your dreams, NFTT.

        Obama will serve 2 terms, and be followed by two more terms of Democrats.

  • Posted By: tiredoflies @ 10/26/2008 10:54:53 PM

    Palin is so self centered. If she canNOT win as part of the team, she will throw them under the bus for HER OWN SELF GAIN.

    What a stinking poor choice McCain made. I am sure he never considered the selfishness of this woman turning against the very team she is part of.

    This woman has FIRED ANYONE SHE HAS NOT LIKED.

    Now, get this:
    .
    SHE IS FIRING MCCAIN BECAUSE HE HAS NOT SERVED HER SELF INTEREST.

    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 10/26/2008 11:03:02 PM

      I really agree. It lends a lot more credence to the allegations against her about preferential firings - I didn't really believe them before. But Sarah Palin is busy trying to distance herself from the man who's *completely* responsible for giving her a place on the national stage, probably in hopes of a 2012 Presidential shot.

      To me, taking the man who gave you your chance, getting the fame, then throwing him to the wolves because you want the job he was going after is pretty self-serving. I've known a lot of people in corporate America who acted the same way, and they didn't really care about anyone but themselves. There's no loyalty there and a LOT of negativity. I don't think she's really done this yet - she hasn't really attacked McCain yet on any substantial level, and it's her right to disagree with him - but if she ever really goes after him, I'll be angry at her on McCain's behalf by proxy. He doesn't deserve that. Post-election will tell.

  • Posted By: RO in Reno @ 10/26/2008 11:02:27 PM

    Palin has stated she has nothing to lose; and perhaps that is true, it will be interesting to see if she is elected to a 2nd term as the Governor of Alaska. if not her future in politics is bleak.
    But she has a future with Fox "news"

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/26/2008 11:02:20 PM

    Taxation is and always has been a redistribution of wealth. Once you recognize that point, the question is, how are we going to spend the money we raise in taxes?

    For the past 8 years, our tax dollars have gone to killing civilians in Iraq and giving big payoffs to Halliburton (co-incidentally owned by the Cheney family). And since there wasn't enough in the treasury to do this in style, we borrowed money from communist China and ran up the national debt to pay for it.

    Like 80% of Americans, I am sick of this particular redistribution plan.

    Obama's plan reduces taxes on 95% of Americans. The other 5% of us (who make over $250,000 a year) can afford to pay an extra 3%. That extra 3% comes out to only $300 for every $10,000 they make above $250,000. It's not going to kill them. In fact, if you make over $250,000 a year, $300 probably doesn't mean much to you. The other source of increased revenue will be making corporations that ship jobs overseas pay a higher share of tax. Right now, these corporations pay a lower share than companies that keep their employees in the USA. No more incentives to hurt America. We all can agree with that.

    Obama promises to go through the Federal budget line by line and cut all the wasteful spending. He promises to have transparency, a website where you can go and actually see the real Federal budget, not the made for TV version you can access under Bush.

    Furthermore, Obama's economic plans will lead to a strong economy, an educated workforce, more American based jobs, affordable health care, and freedom from foreign oil. We will regain our position as a world leader, a nation that spreads democracy not with guns and threats, but with prosperity and diplomacy.

    How do I know this? I read Obama's Blueprint for Change. And I compared it to what McCain had to offer (more tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, more wars, a really inadequate health plan, and the stated intention of overturning Roe v. Wade). You really should visit the websites of both candidates and read their platforms.

    http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

    http://www.johnmccain.com/Issues/jobsforamerica/

  • Posted By: Jrmapu @ 10/26/2008 1:28:34 AM

    I already voted. I am very comfortable with my vote. We will have another 2 more years of democrats increasing our taxes and spending it foolishly on their socialist programs to make the rich richer. Then the economy will turn around after the next election because then the republicans can take control of the house and senate. They will give Obama the credit he is searching for by balancing the budget and leaving a surplus just like they did for Bill.

    • Posted By: Michael Lafferty @ 10/26/2008 1:18:30 PM

      Please try again. 'Socialist' programs do not benefit the rich. Republican control and rampant deregulation benefit the rich. It was in times of Republican control that the government grew and deficits ballooned. President Clinton was not left with a balanced budget or a surplus: the Clinton administration left the incoming Bush administration with one, which it quickly squandered with its pathetic, regressive tax 'relief' for millionaires. Tax relief that failed to produce a substantial number of jobs or economic stability, but instead created the opposite conditions while massively shifting wealth to the richest Americans. Your grasp of recent politics and history are both incorrect and pathetic.

      • Posted By: Jrmapu @ 10/26/2008 10:51:56 PM

        We will have another 2 more years of a depressive economy. America will wake up from the hangover and vote Republican. Socialist programs make people like me pay for them. Why? Because 1) I make less than 250K (the real people who are paying into the system) and 2) I am single. That alone makes me pay more.
        I am the population paying for these socialistic programs that benefit people who are not even US CITIZENS. Now the Dems want to give people who do not pay Social Security, our hard earned monies. That is not a lie. I work in local government and we have programs for immigrants to come here get monies and send them home to their mother countries. That is another reason our economy is in the toilet. This is all true. So don't even try to say otherwise. Its disgusting what I see yet I have to administer the injustice of all the hypocricy in the name of the federal government.

  • Posted By: trogers @ 10/26/2008 10:51:41 PM

    What happens to Gov. Palin? Well, Gov. Palin becomes the prime voice for the religious right which controls the Republican party and she continues the fight for their theocratic vision of society. She represents the belief that her religion and her God alone belongs in the schools, in the workplace and especially in the government. She espouses the idea that religion is the only source of and only reason for all intellectual achievement. She inevitably leads America to a society easily divided into those who know God's will as she does, and those who do not. The same kind of strict doctrine that drives radical Muslims to hate non-muslims: drives Gov. Palin and her followers to hate all other religions and races who will not submit to their version of the true religion. Gov. Palin will be the next messiah of the Republican evangelical wing. Oh, I forgot she is not a man; so she will have to be content to be the next messiah's helper. Are you watching Mr. Romney?

  • Posted By: albert_1 @ 10/26/2008 10:30:52 PM

    Sarah Palin "reinventing"? she would need much more than all the "good" in her to have a grasp of what the hell is actually happening. In line with this autor's though, next we will have reformers such as Homer Simpson, heroes like Peter Griffin and strong visioners such as Barbie and Ken.

    • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 10/26/2008 10:46:45 PM


      I don't want to dance on her political grave, from what I hear Dems thought Reagan running in 1980 was a joke and boy did it backfire! However, Palin is facing problems back in Alaska, has scared the bejesus out of independents and starred in a high number of interview bloopers, and there weren't THAT many interviews to begin with!

      What this article claims could have been said of John Edwards, who in '04 was a talent unused (let's forget for a moment his political career is over) and who could and did come back and managed to set poverty center stage during the primaries. Yet, while Edwards was a talent unused Sarah Palin is sinking her ticket! She is a joke and I reckon many republicans will admit to that when this is over.

  • Posted By: George from Westerville @ 10/26/2008 9:30:35 PM

    More pandering to this idea that Sarah Palin will be a force after this election. I think that is a ridiculous notion, she's going to be just a bizarre footnote in history, a source of jokes and ridicule until she is all but forgotten. Her 15 miutes of fame will be over soon, I doubt if she will even be re-elected as governor of Alaska, her many scandals will catch up with her and her right wing nutcase viewpoints have been exposed. She is a liability, not an asset, can't wait until this election is over, don't even want to hear her whiny, hate mongering rhetoric ever again.

    • Posted By: HAL--- @ 10/26/2008 10:39:46 PM

      She'll end up as a regular "political analyst" on FOX news, no doubt.

  • Posted By: pol.nut @ 10/26/2008 7:58:46 PM

    I think it would be downright silly for Republicans to blame Palin if McCain loses, or even blame McCain come to that. The truth is, the odds were always stacked heavily against him. To my mind, his losing is not really surprising at all. What is really astonishing is that he has managed to hang on to Obama's coat tails for so long.
    It speaks of a profound weakness in Obama, not McCain, that he hasn't run away with this election from day 1.
    One thing I do agree with. We, or the Republican party haven't seen the last of Sarah Palin, and we all better get used to more of her.

    • Posted By: benivarius @ 10/26/2008 8:04:06 PM

      OK, following that line of logic, would you please elaborate on a few things?

      1. What about Sarah Palin do you think makes her a capable and stable leader of our party?

      2. I agree that there was no way for this to be our year, but what about John McCain's campaign indicates to you that it was well run and successful?

      • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 10/26/2008 9:12:26 PM


        Oh ben, you said the magic word "logic", that's anathema to fundies. The fact is that people are now trying to save face; the news that broke this weekend is that there are leaks left and right in the McCain camp to get the blame away from them when this is over. The economy has played a part but some people want to absolve McCain of all guilt; it's not like his lack of message, erratic response to the Bail Out talks, his picking Palin without properly vetting her, his virulence in the trail (after vowing he wouldn't) and cranky demeanor during the debates didn't play a part. It's not only independents, staunch conservatives like Ken Adelman, David Frum and Peggy Noonan are turning on this ticket.

        Republicans must feel worse about the McCain campaign than we did about the Kerry campaign four years ago, and that's saying a lot! I personally don't want to browbeat anyone; it is a human tendency to protect their ego but I do call them on their bull. In the last eight years I've seen my wages fall and my health insurance disappear and a deficit which my daughter will have to pay for well into adulthood, that's just unacceptable to me. McCain isn't the answer, and when the tempers are no longer flared, most people will admit to that.

        Cheers!

        • Posted By: neos @ 10/26/2008 10:01:04 PM

          Well and temperately said.

      • Posted By: silverpa @ 10/26/2008 9:50:51 PM

        benvarius..I'm not sure if Gov Palin is ready to be the Republican Party Leader yet. If she could get 4 years as VP under McCain, then I think she would be there. The VP would be a great place for her to "season". The Media and a lot of the Lefties like to point out that she is but "a heartbeat" away...etc...but they seem so out of touch with the way things work in Wash DC. The Pres & VP are sourrounded with scores of advisors and staff. Neither The Pres or VP make decisions without consulting with all their advisors/staff and other experts! The Pres & VP do not sit on thrones...they actually do not have all that much power. Congress has to approve virtually everything they want to do...Like go to war with Iraq..Congress approved that. Congress has to approve the annual budgets...like the money going to the Iraq War. Congress is supposed to provide the oversight of Finance and Banking which they failed to do and now we have our problems. The Dems control Congress...the Dems are the Majority in Congress. The Dems chair the Finance & Banking Committees. Blame Bush if you want to..but your blame is misplaced!! And a vote for Obama is a vote for "more of the same". Ironic that his platform is "Change". He and Biden are what needs to be changed. Gov Palin is the new freash air that is needed. But I digress...Benvarius..Sarah is the embodiment of the American Spirit! She needs some seasoning, but she is an American. We seem to have lost all that our country was founded on....If Obama, Pelosi & Reid end up in power this time, we will move toward a new America. One leaning towards Socialism and a Welfare State. A recent comment I saw from a recent college graduate, said he couldn't find a job now, but if Obama is elected, he would stop looking because the Govt would take care of him and he wouldn't have to work!! Well, if Obama is elected, he will not be able to put into place any of his programs for a long time. We are too much in debt to foreign countries for the loans to get us out of our current problems. So the give away programs of the Dems will either get us further into debt or big business and the wealthy will be taxed to death tp provide for those less fortunate and jobs will wither away...and we becoame a welfare state dependant on the Govt for day to day living. Big Brother will be a reality.

    • Posted By: silverpa @ 10/26/2008 9:06:07 PM

      Good post pol.nut.:) I agree, if McCain does not win, we'll see/hear more from Sarah. I fully expect to see her as a Pres candidate in 2012. The Rep Party seems to have lost leadership. And even though I am a fan of Pres Bush, I think he dropped the ball in the last couple of years (since the Dem takeover of Congress) . He seems to have just lost his energy in dealing with "The Hill". So Sarah comes along as a breath of fresh air. I hope she will continue to rejuvenate the Republican Party...because if Obama, Pelosi & Reid, are in charge for the next four years, we'll want to get back to our American way of life in 2012. And Gov Palin will get us back on track I think.

  • Posted By: fpgonzo @ 10/26/2008 9:04:09 PM

    Being an Alaskan, I feel pretty confident that Palin is simply a flash in the pan, an eight-by-ten glossy, all form and no substance, lacking in intellect to do ANY heavy lifting...and she proved that repeatedly while blaming everyone but her low-double-digit IQ every time. I think she will definately run in 2012, but will fade early in the primaries because she simply doesn't have what it takes to make it in the big leagues.

    • Posted By: neos @ 10/26/2008 9:59:17 PM

      I hope you are wrong about Palin not surving the primaries in 2012. I hope the extreme rightwing thumpers and knuckledraggers force her nomination on the GOP. That will be the final nail in the coffin of the party of Bush.

  • Posted By: Mr.Independentvoter @ 10/26/2008 9:54:48 PM

    I am an independent. My motto is to vote for the person who I think is least likely to screw things up. So when Sarah Palin first showed up on the scene, my first reaction was, "Who!? My next was to do some research on this person. What I found was disturbing. I started reading ADN.com, which is the Alaska Daily News website. People, Troopergate is just the tip of the iceberg. There are reports that she used her office as Mayor to for her own personal gain, as well as accepting gifts while in office. She lied when at the Republican convention when claiming she said Thanks but no thanks to money for the bridge to nowhere. As we all now know, she kept the money and never gave it back. She gets asked the same tough question the other candidates get asked; but isn't it funny that she whines about being picked on. Of course she is the only one that can't answer the questions in an intelligent way, or avoids answering the questions all together.

    I could go on, but the point is this. Sara Palin has shown herself as the type of politician that will abuse her power and use it for personal gain. She can't handle the press because she lacks the substance, then tries hide her transparent lack of substance by whining. And any way you cut it, she has no busy ever being anywhere near the White House, except as a tourist.

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/26/2008 9:30:09 PM

    The Kennedy tax cut.

    http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1765.cfm

    About half way through the article.

    "President Kennedy proposed massive tax-rate reductions, which were passed by Congress and became law after he was assassinated. The 1964 tax cut reduced the top marginal personal income tax rate from 91 percent to 70 percent by 1965. The cut reduced lower-bracket rates as well. In the four years prior to the 1965 tax-rate cuts, federal government income tax revenue--adjusted for inflation--increased at an average annual rate of 2.1 percent, while total government income tax revenue (federal plus state and local) increased by 2.6 percent per year . In the four years following the tax cut, federal government income tax revenue increased by 8.6 percent annually and total government income tax revenue increased by 9.0 percent annually. Government income tax revenue not only increased in the years following the tax cut, it increased at a much faster rate.
    The Kennedy tax cut set the example that President Ronald Reagan would follow some 17 years later. By increasing incentives to work, produce, and invest, real GDP growth increased in the years following the tax cuts: More people worked, and the tax base expanded. Additionally, the expenditure side of the budget benefited as well because the unemployment rate was significantly reduced.
    Using the Congressional Budget Office's revenue forecasts (made with the full knowledge of the future tax cuts), revenues came in much higher than had been anticipated, even after the "cost""of the tax cut had been taken into account. Additionally, in 1965--one year following the tax cut--personal income tax revenue data exceeded expectations by the greatest amounts in the highest income classes.
    Testifying before Congress in 1977, Walter Heller, President Kenned''s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, summarized:
    What happened to the tax cut in 1965 is difficult to pin down, but insofar as we are able to isolate it, it did seem to have a tremendously stimulative effect, a multiplied effect on the economy. It was the major factor that led to our running a $3 billion surplus by the middle of 1965 before escalation in Vietnam struck us. It was a $12 billion tax cut, which would be about $33 or $34 billion in today's terms, and within one year the revenues into the Federal Treasury were already above what they had been before the tax cut.
    Did the tax cut pay for itself in increased revenues? I think the evidence is very strong that it did."

  • Posted By: Frustrated in Alaska @ 10/26/2008 9:22:01 PM

    After having witnessed the unbelievable intellectual inabilities of Palin throughout this election campaign, it befuddles me how anyone can continue to give her so much credit. Should she become the leading force of the Republican party, I'd say the Democrats pretty much have the U.S. government under their control for the forseeable future. Such a joke. And, yes, I am an Alaskan resident.

  • Posted By: Omaar @ 10/26/2008 9:17:39 PM

    This is what I do know about Sarah Palin ....

    The Alaskan EarMarks Queen, of the Frozen Tundra.

    She has no [Executive Experience]

    Her greatest contribution to Wasilla is the Hockey Rink she had erected and she Built the Hockey Rink before purchasing the land to build the road that leads to the Hockey Rink, she built the road on land, she Did Not purchase and now those same landowners whose land was used to lead to the Hockey Rink, now have her A!! in litigation....

    Big Note: For using the Land Owners land Without Purchasing the Land First !!

    The Town of Wasilla, population 9,000 or Less, was only 1 Million Dollar in Debt, when Palin took Office, When Palin left her office as Mayor of Wasilla, she left the Town of Wasilla with a 20-25 Million Dollars in DEBT !!!

    Sounds like Bush-Cheney in a Dress, she's like Bush in this regard....

    She's like Bush enetering office with Less Debt and leaving office in Greater Debt than Before !!!

    She's like Cheney when it comes to the [Hunting]...

    America will not get the allow her the Chance or Witness another Cheney Hunting Incident, in the Body of Sarah Palin .

    Todd Palin was an is Sarah Palin's Shadow Mayor and now Shadow Governor, with the Paper Trail to prove it too.

    Plain Lied about her turning down that Ketchikan "Bridge To Nowhere"

    She sure as hell, Never Returned the EarMarks Millions given for the Project, an used the Millions for other Projects.

    If she turned the Project Down, why did'nt she Return the Funding [EarMark Millions]

    Her Gas-Oil Pipeline, via a Canadian Gas-Oil Company, she claimed had been started in Alaska, during the GOP Convention, was a LIE and it Does Not Exist and is now in Litigation as I peck away !!!

    The Native Canadian Indians are also taking the Canadian Gas-Oil Company, Palin is using, are beig Dragged into court, based on these Native Canadian Indians taking them to court, because they REFUSE to have their Land used in this Gas-oil Venture.


    Palin is not a Feminist at all, based on her Husband Controling her Mayoral and Governorship. A feminist will stand on her own an not allow her Husband to Involve himself in her Business and on her Business Affairs.

    Palin and her Husband are AIP members and have their own Agenda's

    She has No National or International Experience, she's not well read or Educated and these are just a few facts about Sarah Palin, The EarMarks Queen of the Frozen Tundra.

    Troopergate Proves that McCain Gambled on this Wildcard Alaskan and like most [Maverick's]...

    McCain's A!! is feeling the Pain of Sarah Palin and he Deserves Every Bit of Grief he's recieving.

    He Gambled with the American People and you don't Gamble with America when it comes to the Economy An especially International and National Affiars, by presenting a Good Looking, Political Novice like Sarah Palin.

  • Posted By: ellieirish @ 10/26/2008 9:15:58 PM

    It's amazing to me the anti-Maverick atttitude that Palin the so-called Maverick has. She claims she'll investigate corruption and clean out Washington. But note that when she's on the opposite end of an investigation, she stalls, lies, denies, blockades, and cries political foul. What will her response be to the Washington elite she gets Mavericky on, if they use the tactics she is using; The stalling, lying and denying she utilizes against the Mavericks trying to expose her ethical and political hypocracy? I guess she thinks those she wants to attack will see the error of their ways and be way more cooperative. You betcha.

  • Posted By: tiredoflies @ 10/26/2008 9:08:31 PM

    From within the McCain Campaign

    A McCain source says she appears to be looking out for herself more than the McCain campaign.

    "She is a diva. She takes no advice from anyone," said this McCain adviser. "She does not have any relationships of trust with any of us, her family or anyone else.

    "Also, she is playing for her own future and sees herself as the next leader of the party.

    Remember: Divas trust only unto themselves, as they see themselves as the beginning and end of all wisdom."

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse