6-Pack Palin = The Axis of Evil
Decent people run in fear and loathing from her vile and dangerous combination of ME FIRST; dishonesty; abuse of power and hate tactics.
Palin is the reincarnation of Hitler
6-Pack Palin = The Axis of Evil
Decent people run in fear and loathing from her vile and dangerous combination of ME FIRST; dishonesty; abuse of power and hate tactics.
Palin is the reincarnation of Hitler
That is the dumbest post in the history of Newsweak (which is really saying something).
You are a complete, blithering idiot.
Voter rally attendance in Albuquerque, New Mexico on Saturday 10/25
As per the Albuquerque Journal:
Obama: 45,000
McCain: Less than 1000
P.S. How in the name of God does Elisabeth Hasselback lend even a REMOTE air of credibility to McCain's campaign?!?!?! For godsake, she's ELISABETH HASSELBACK!!!! IS THAT THE BEST OUR PARTY CAN DO AT THIS TIME OF CRISIS!?!?!?!??! THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT!!!! WE NEED TO MAKE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY THE PARTY OF SMART PEOPLE, NOT MINDLESS AUTOMATONS WHO ARE SWAYED BY PRETTY BLONDE HAIR, AND IT'S INSULTING THAT THAT'S HOW SHALLOW MY PARTY THINKS I AM!!!!! PLEASE, INTELLIGENT CONSERVATIVES OUT THERE, JOIN THE FIGHT TO RECLAIM CRITICAL THINKING AND INTELLIGENT THOUGHT FOR OUR PARTY, BECAUSE THROUGH THAT WE WILL ALWAYS WIN!!!!!
It was really bad.
I guess what I'm trying to say, is that when Reagan was president he talked to us like intelligent human beings and presented real, substantive arguments to us that would stand up under scrutiny. Why is it, then, that today's Republican party has so little respect for our thinking skills that it puts an idiot like Sarah Palin up in front of us because they think we are shallow enough to vote for a candidate because she's cute? That's really insulting.
Mark my words, we need to take our party back from the Fundamentalists and make this the party of intelligent thought and modern times, because ultimately those people don't support the Republican party. They support their crazy fundamentalist churches, and they only vote Republican because our leaders pander to their whack-job agenda simply to garner their votes, while simultaneously forcing the rest of us to put up with candidates who reflect that craziness in order to support OUR economic beliefs. Should it really have to be that way? Should we moderate conservatives really have to shoo in crazy religious nonsense simply to stimulate the economy? And besides, those people will turn their backs on us the very first second that we mention evolution or the earth being more that 6000 years old, and I know for a fact that there are a LOT of Republicans out there who think that's insane. How scary is that? So please, please, smart, moderate conservatives, get out there and work for changing our party into something better that what it's become.
The only 'Palin Problem' is the problem she is making for the Obama Democrats. Countless Hillary Dems are switching their affections to Palin!
And every one of these votes AGAINST Obama is a vote FOR McCain/Palin. How many hundreds of thousands of these does it take to swing an election?
I do believe you're living in a dream world. For every one vote Palin might-- might-- draw from the Democratic side, she's sending at least 10 from the Republican side the other way. The woman is a liability-- not only to her own ticket, but to American politics in general.
I disagree. Sarah Palin is a representation of many American women and for you to discard her as uneducated and stupid is a big mistake. There is a reason why she breathed life into the McCain campaign. You and many democrats are seriously underestimating her and Joe Plumber. Your elitist views are not felt everywhere. I am educated as is my husband and we both like what she represents, although I don't agree with all of her platforms. Politics as usual is what is dividing this country. I want a new approach and to say that Sarah Palin can't handle it is a mistake. Obama is even more untested in politics than even Palin and I don't hear you speaking about that. Or if he is involved, it's usually a "present" vote instead of a yes or no. He also walks away from anything that might taint his campaign, so it looks to me like he is trying to be a President more than standing up for what he actually believes in. Present doesn't cut it.
A representation of many American women? God forbid. I hope most American women do not use their job positions to wage a personal vendetta against someone they dislike. I hope most American women do not blatantly lie about what they have supported, and continue to lie even when exposed. I doubt most of us bring our husbands to our jobs and allow them to participate. I doubt most of us take money from the taxpayers to ferry our children around the country and pay for luxurious hotel rooms when they have not been invited to a formal business function. I have to work for 6 YEARS to earn the amount of money the RNC spent on fancy clothes for Palin to wear, as she put if, for "3 days". Nice of her to then state she would give them away to charity. This woman does not represent ME!
In your dreams ! Women in general are far smarter than you give us credit for.
Switching from an intelligent Woman like Hillary to an airhead like Palin is not a given.
Women with any brains vote for the issues not skirts..
That argument may have held water the day after the GOP convention, but the luster has worn off, and the vast majority of "Clinton Dems" have returned to the Obama fold. Sorry, try again.
Well,we know enough about Darman that he called Romney ''buff and handsome'' at any rate,as we saw in NEWSWEAK some months ago,bringing forth the usual sturm und drang handwringing among the lefty portion of the Internet.
See Barney Franks comments on the news, including face the nation last week, stating that Democrats in Congress intend to greatly raise taxes and go on a spending spree.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1Mazjm_A5k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGnSAlqjoU
See http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/23617.html
And again what was Frank saying at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. in 2005 to fix Fannie and Freddie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
"These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis, the more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."
So which party is really the liar that soaked the American people?
See also: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/08/politics/main2335631.shtml
The problem the republican have is that the party has gone too far right. Thus, leaving moderates with no home base but the democratic party. With the country centered between left and right, Palin can only appeal to the base, the far right. For Pailin to prosper in 2012, she'll have to include independents and moderates. With her ideology and lack of understanding of the issues, her role will be just a poster girl.
McCain's NOT going to lose.
McCain became a loser when he chose Palin as his running mate.
Sarah Palin is a mom of 5, a soon to be grandmother, and loves to hunt. She is the Governor of a state of 600,000 and was the Mayor of a town of 6000. She hired a lobbyist to bring in earmarks over 28 million dollars, and as Governor has requested more earmarks than any other state per ca pita.
She is tough. When the news media keeps telling everyone that she did not sell the state jet on ebay, or that she was not always against the bridge to nowhere, she sticks to her scripts. In the face of truth, she is able to repeat her stomp speech and not change a thing. Not many politicians can say that.
She stood up to Charlie Gibson in her interview and said, "Yes, I am ready to be president." She is ready. How many people can say they are ready to be president. Why do the liberals want to ask her questions about her past or what she believes in? This is not fair. She has a right to be VP without explaining herself. Katie Couric should be ashamed of using gotcha politics. Who watches SNL ? They should do a skit on Obama not taxing anyone over 65 that makes under $50,000 a year.
She also stated that she did not blink when McCain asked her to be VP. This is proof that she is a patriot. She will take on Russia, and go to war if necessary to protect our great US of A. She is ready to be VP and even President.
McCain knew it after meeting with her twice that she was his soul mate. McCain's gut told him- now that is the kind of guy that I want leading the country. A man that tosses reason and logic out of the window and goes with his gut. Unlike that wimp Obama; who wants to talk or use diplomacy first.
Proven by all of the things I have listed. Who cares about The Bush Doctrine? She is a mother of 5, not a baby killer. She looks like the girl next door, and has a comprehensive energy plan that includes only drilling. She will not drill in Indiana, Ohio or Michigan, but there will be lots of jobs in Alaska- America's Last Frontier.
Uh...actually, no, she doesn't get to be VP without explaining herself.
Running for national office means you don't have to explain your family, your private religous beliefs, or your wardrobe choices, but it sure does mean you are expected to explain your political views, your education, your experience and your record.
Just because she explains herself poorly doesn't mean she gets a free pass.
Why then,would such questions,put to Biden by a Florida reporter and which he refused to answer,result in the Obama campaign sending a threatening letter [a now -common occurance with the Obama camp as utilized by their chief hatchet man Robert Bauer],that eliminated the television channel from conducting any more interviews with the Obama ticket?
How do you square such threats with a free and open discussion of a political candidates strengths or weaknesses? How would you respond if this was the McCain camp pulling such stunts? Even though CNN has already apologized for blatant ''journalistic dishonesty''regarding an interview last week between CNN reporter Drew Griffen and Sarah Palin,did the McCain camp make such threats as Obamas did to CNN even before it belatedly offered its mea culpa?
Obviously,the stench of hypocrisy becomes pervasive. Then too,does thus augur police state tactics to be used against percieved ''enemies''of an Obama administration? Will the feared theory of a ''police state''under a Bush, become a reality under an Obama?
Soulmate, you might want to check with the staff on the plane about that. He picked her to lure the democratic women voters that were for Hilliary Clinton. Unfortunately, that did not happen. She is a cancer on the Republican party"s reputation. She wouldn't know the truth if it knocked on her door. Please, the people who support her obviously don't really think about the consequences. I'm terrified!
so am I
Its not the wardrobe per but what it represents. They brought in as stylist immediately and the next thing we know she starts to resemble Cindy McCain in style. In such hard economic times, to see a super rich heiress wife wearing an outfit to the convention valued at a third of a million dollars followed by Sara following in her foot steps, well it just seems to align with the bogus Joe the Plumber myth. He is not a plumber, owes taxes, and lost his drivers license due to unpaid fines. Some might think that not finishing a plumber apprenticeship is no big deal but plumbers deal with our home gas lines so its a safety issue to ensure they are licensed so he should not even be in that role if not licensed. Both issues just show the hypocrasy of "we are just working folks" but given the chance they jump at a wardrobe from Saks.
Bingo!
Why should women "aspire" to be like Palin? Being educated and professional does not have to include dishonest and greedy. Today she is whining about everyone picking on her! If you don't want people talking about your "borrowed" clothes then SHUT UP! She can't talk about foreigh policy, taxes, healthcare, or economics because she doesn't have credible knowledge to share so she continue to babble about herself. She claims the media is sexist. Why is she babbleing about taking her broom and mop to Washington to clean house~ Who is being sexist? Does she want to be the VP or the housekeeper? She is certainly qualified to be the housekeeper, maybe she should resubmit her resume'
Thank you for your well-thought-out and entertaining comment! You are spot-on.
I disagree. When the smoke clears,and Palin is sent packing back to Alaska,those who installed the Expected One,will have won a Pyhrric victory,for this has already had the effect of setting back feminism and the ''impartial''power of the Fourth Estate for a generation and more.
Feminism,already having taken a hit in the Clinton years for his unfortunate ''bimbo eruptions'' and still Standing By Their Man [The great political cartoonist OLIPHANT,placed the leaders of NOW and the Feminist Majority in monkey-like ''Hear No,See No,Speak No Evil ''poses in most of Americas newspapers of note],will be gutted after their treatment of Palin.
Obviously any depiction of a Hillary,Nancy Pelosi,Eleanor Holmes-Norton,or a Michelle Obama as a ''Caribou Barbie''[ ''Chicago Moll'', ''DC Diva'',or ''Frisco Frump''],would be villified as ''hateful and intolerant'' by liberals as it appeared in an obscure rightwinged blog or even a FOX,let alone an MSM creature of note such as NEWSWEAK.
And forget any more adherence to being able to actually levy charges of ''hate and intolerance'' in the future. So much of it has been generated in this election that both of the words have lost all currency and will cease to be effective. The media will be the last people on earth who should advance such charges in an Obama presidency,and of course his supporters,after all that has been already seen and heard,especially regarding Palin,will be dismissed by Americans as mere hypocrites.
''You may find,that having...is not the same thing as wanting''
Leonard Nimoy [Spock],STAR TREK ''The Amok Time''.1967.
Obama's ill-conceived programs will require him to tax, and his health care plan alone is a substantial hidden tax on all business, large an small. In reality, it does not really matter who he taxes, those taxes are going to be passed through the economy. He has to tax, because it is they only way he can pay for his massive social engineering experiments. Any first year economics student knows that taxation is a tool used to contract an economy experiencing inflation, because it reduces demand by reducing the amount of money individuals and businesses have to spend. It is contractionary, which is exactly what you do not want to do when the problem is that the economy is contracting already into recession. Like Hoover and FDR, Obama's plans will only make it worse for longer.
See e.g. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/03/opinion/main4499465.shtml
And
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx
How many full-time employees with benefits does a person with a $50,000 income personally employ? For most, none. How many does a person with $250,000 employ? One less under Obama???s tax plan, two less if you include Obama???s health plan.
None of this matters. America is in a financial meltdown, and we want a clean slate. That doesn't include McCain and his doubling down on Bush's economic polices.
Palin 2024!
What do you really know about Obama's economic philosophy? Since he has never run a town, state or business, he has no record to look at. Oh, he has made lots of promises, but given that he broke his promise to be limited to public campaign funds, you cant put much faith in that, and there will be no means to keep those promises anyway.
But you do know that Obama, along with his democratic buddies in Congress, personally and professionally advocated for a residential housing policy favoring forced sub-prime lending, which subsequently resulted in massive defaults and foreclosures, leading to your loss of significant equity value in your home, to the point that it destabilized your banks, which panicked the stock market, which wiped out your savings.
Look and listen to Obama for yourself. Obama in this video, addressing his community activist work and his work representing ACORN in litigation against the banks and relating to the Community Reinvestment Act, and addressing the failure of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as those actions relate to the destruction of our economy by causing the current real estate and subsequent financial crisis, states that, and I quote:
"Subprime lending started out as a good idea, helping Americans buy homes who previously could not afford to. Financial institutions created new financial instruments that could securitize these loans, slice them into finer and finer risk categories, and spread them out among investors and around the country, as well as around the world. In theory, this should have allowed mortgage lending to be less risky, and more diversified."
Acknowledging the catastrophe, but as apologist for the Democrats, Obama then offers this justification.
"The original idea was a good one, which was, lets see if we can distribute risk more broadly, and make it easier to provide loans to people who otherwise might not be able to get one."
Yah, great idea. Economically unsound, but embraced by Obama. Listen for yourself. You cannot dispute the mans on words recorded live:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related
Below is a link to C-SPAN video clips of the Congressional hearings at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix Fannie and Freddie. See for yourself who said what.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
America saw McCain make a fool of himself during the economic fallout. Canceling his run for President, stating that he will not debate until it's resolved, leaving to do the debate before it was resolved, bragging that he fixed the problem before it failed, and finally signed a bill that included earmarks.
WillieBoy: [in response to previous,now buried far below]:
Obama can still lose even by ''winning''. This is a central thesis of articles by University of Fresno[Calif.] professor of classical Greek history Victor Davis Hanson ,and science-fiction author Jerry Pournelle. In ''losing'',Obama ties himself to the tenets shared by the Democrat parties leftwing.[it is important in the extreme to observe that the MSM will in no way,shape or form,comment on this coming reality. The work for now,is to focus on Palins wardrobe,insert sneering sexist labels of a ''Caribou Barbie'',and speak as little as possible on the growing scandals within the congresional Democrat majority].
Even though the media in the forms of TIME,NEWSWEAK[an especially egregious offender],CNN and MSNBC as well as the main networks,have striven to ignore or never mention the socialist aspects of the new Obama America,too much is getting out.
The ''51-49''[which we will explore in a post response]. The repeal of major labour provisions of the TAFT-HARTLEY Act. The imposition of the ''Fairness Doctrine''. the elimination of American private 401[k] plans[the providers of which employ hundreds of thousands of American workers],to be replaced by a government-mandated scheme. The imposition of windfall taxes on American energy providers,thus,as in the 1970s,only assisting and enriching Arab oil sheikhs,while crippling American workers in this vital area. Union hegemony over the workplace. Imposition of the Goreian ''carbon tax''which is already failing in the EU as we speak creating massive labor and consumer disruption. More regulatory schemes,leading to increased government control of private enterprise.
These are all facts. They are platforms advanced by the most ideological among the Democrat Partys ruling lawmakers,and thus,they are not based in grounded economic,social,or geo-political sense.
Thus if Obama leads from this side of the spectrum,he will ''lose''even by ''winning''[As Clinton,to his consternation observed when the on-the-outs GOP,still smarting from Watergate and Iran-Contra,suddenly seized control of both houses of Congress making an effective charge that the Congress was becoming too leftwinged,which Americans will no more abide than they did when it was under rightist control by the GOP].
''51-49''.
This device was ushered into play by the leftwinged majority of the California state legislature in 2004. As California goes,as they say,so does the nation,especially as the device is wielded by the House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi,who represents San Francisco,and her pal George Miller,across the Bay in Martinez,who sits as Chairman of the powerful House Education and Labor Committee.
What occurs is both simple and convoluted all at once. The moment that a small company hits 50 employees,the state mandates that when a 51st employee is added to the company rolls, a gigantic host of state regulations kicks in requiring,much as we have seen with SARBANES-OXLEY,a full 10% of a companies work force weeding through and carrying out regulatory practice to ensure that the workplace is adhering to state law,at this point,a thing less of ''law''and more of gigantic bureaucracy. Their only purpose in life is to act as in-house[or company] regulating proxies for the government.
Obviously,this device is a job-killer. Companies are fleeing California in droves,moving to neighboring Oregon,Nevada,and Arizona to seek less regulatory climes. The key area of Socialism,as Benito Mussolini observed,[dwelt in greater detail in this weekends article by Dr. Jerry Pournelle],was to place regulatory practice into the hands of the State to such a degree that it would hold sole hegemony over the affairs of private enterprise. Workers would become bureaucrats in their own right,serving the interests of the State. In this case,Italian fascisti would be merely replaced by government-sponsored unions,causing ever more rack and ruin among the abilities of Americans to keep and hold jobs.[so bad in fact,that Enzo Ferrari threw up his hands in disgust and closed down his plants for ''the duration'',keenly awaiting Mussolinis overthrow and the end of the war].
In this climate then,Washington will grow expodentially,becoming a giant hive of regulatory and bureaucratic activity,its machinery greased and oiled by the efforts of the common American worker and the burdans placed upon the company he or she serves.
Whether the ''trains run on time''or not is besides the point. The Socialist ideal is that all share[literally in Obamas case],not simply ''wealth''but misery as well. This is Karl Marx' great leavener realized. It will be incremental. And it will not be immediately felt. It will the presented as a fait accompli nonetheless.This remains a thing unseen by those who are blinded by the light of a ''messiah''.
www.jerrypournelle.com:''The View From Chaos Manor:Capitalism,Socialism,and Distributism'' Oct.24,2008.
I think it would be America loss for not electing Palin to be the Vice President of this Great Country
All we have heard the the two candidates running for President promises that they probable wont keep.
But, here we have someone who could make a difference in America. Not ones who are in the Senate
with the good old boys, but someone who would really listen to the people and make the CORRECT
changes for America. On Sarah clothing sounds like a lot of nothing. Sarah Palin you are the
right person for the President of the United State.
I'll take a pass at abusive Palin. The AIP is simply unpatriotic. She supports it and Todd was a member for seven years - that is not in dispute. AIP founder Joe Vogler is recorded as saying "The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government. And I won't be buried under their damn flag. I'll be buried in Dawson. And when Alaska is an independent nation they can bring my bones home."
You can hear him here (tape 18) http://uaf-db.uaf.edu/jukebox/yuch/htm/jvog.htm
or at the end of this short video entitled Sarah Palin Pallin Around with Secessionists. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eniG9l_7its
He is also quoted on the AIP website ( http://www.akip.org ) with the following, "I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her d@mned institutions." http://www.akip.org/introduction.html
who would want Biden to be president, are you serious I would want Sarah over Biden
Yeah Sarah as 5 kids and brings 2 of them on stage and when she goes to other public events. How can you not vote for a mother who would use her kids to get votes.
I do not care if Sarah Palin has $150K wardrobe. If she would have worn her own "humble" average joe clothes, the media would have made fun of her walmart shoes. The girl can't win with the media, but she has won over America and her life resonates well with the hard-working men and women of this country. Get over it and get out and vote!
So you don't mind that she routinely uses other people's money for her personal benefit? That's the real issue.
Let her 'life' resonate on a talk show. We're speaking of the next potential president (no guarantees McCain will make it through four years). Can you honestly justify allowing this women to have that kind of power?
What did Abdullah's Greek Temple cost??? Seen MicHELLes $500 lunch tab??? What did the investigations on Joe the Plumber cost??? How about the $$$ to keep Tony Rezko quiet??? Or Joe O'Bidens bribes???
NOBAMA!!!
"Barack Obama's campaign killed all interviews with a Florida TV station after Sen. Joe Biden, the Democratic vice presidential nominee, faced tough and critical questions from a reporter at the Orlando station, the Orlando Sentinel reported. In a communication which serves to put all other media on notice that an Obama administration will exercise media blackmail in response to tough questioning, the Obama camp killed a WFTV interview with Biden's wife Jill, according to an Orlando Sentinel blog.
"This cancellation is non-negotiable, and further opportunities for your station to interview with this campaign are unlikely, at best for the duration of the remaining days until the election," wrote Laura K. McGinnis, Central Florida communications director for the Obama campaign, according to the Sentinel.
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2008/10/obama-campaign.html
See the interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQXcImQfubM
No one complained when Hannity ask Palin what was her favorite color. why should biden complain?
Hannity talks to her as if she is a 4 year old, and she follows his lead.
Cutting to the chase- If Palin were that political savvy, smart, intune- she would not have been tethered to such a tight leesh, she would not have bombed in interviews- regardless of HOW the questions were asked, she would be ABLE to CLEARLY state what she is about- not just trash talking the others, not talk in circles back peddling half the time- AND so would her supporters; they would not have not driven the "physical image" card, they would have released her credentials, schooling, successes, trials and tribulations, and she would have more "A-Lister(s)" support. (does anyone REALLY remember what or who Elisabeth Hasselbeck does/is, who is Jow Blow again- the guy frustrated "I cannot get l a i d guy"...besides being the one that shot Rosie down...) If she was THAT God-fearing why was she NOT watching what her daughter was doing, she would not be playing the succession card and the republican card against each other. Even more simplistic she would not be acting like a scorned, shot down beauty contestant, the "I'LL SHOW YOU" gig. Unfortunately, because of Females like her (real) Women get labled as such...Take a midol Palin and just deal.
I NEED TO PROOF READ MORE... ::hangs head in fake shame::
Cutting to the chase-If Palin were that politically savvy, smart, in tune, she would not have been tethered to such a tight leash. She would not have bombed in interviews- regardless of HOW the questions were asked, she would be ABLE to CLEARLY state what she is about; not just resorting to trash talking the others, nor talk in circles back peddling half the time- AND so would her supporters. Her party would not have driven the "physical image" card, they would have released her credentials, and schooling, successes, trials and tribulations, and she would have more ???A-Lister" support. (does anyone REALLY remember what or who Elisabeth Hasselbeck does/is,...besides being the one that shot Rosie down, OR who is Joe Blow again- besides the I do not pay taxes, tickets, become a licensed contractor (if he screws up the customer pays in other words) "I cannot get l a i d guy"...) If Palin were THAT God-fearing, why was she NOT watching what her daughter was doing? She would not be playing the succession card and the republican card against each other. Even more simplistic she would not be acting like a scorned, shot down beauty contestant, the "I'LL SHOW YOU" gig. Unfortunately, because of Females like her (real) Women get labeled as such...Take a Midol Palin and just deal.
Paragraphs would make a nice start.
Why one should always proof-read. ::gigle-smirk::
Cutting to the chase-If Palin were that politically savvy, smart, in tune, she would not have been tethered to such a tight leash. She would not have bombed in interviews- regardless of HOW the questions were asked, she would be ABLE to CLEARLY state what she is about; not just resorting to trash talking the others, nor talk in circles back peddling half the time- AND so would her supporters. Her party would not have driven the "physical image" card, they would have released her credentials, and schooling, successes, trials and tribulations, and she would have more ???A-Lister" support. (does anyone REALLY remember what or who Elisabeth Hasselbeck does/is,...besides being the one that shot Rosie down, OR who is Joe Blow again- besides the I do not pay taxes, tickets, become a licensed contractor (if he screws up the customer pays in other words) "I cannot get l a i d guy"...) If Palin were THAT God-fearing, why was she NOT watching what her daughter was doing? She would not be playing the succession card and the republican card against each other. Even more simplistic she would not be acting like a scorned, shot down beauty contestant, the "I'LL SHOW YOU" gig. Unfortunately, because of Females like her (real) Women get labeled as such...Take a Midol Palin and just deal.
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss