Why McCain Won

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: lsssjss @ 10/27/2008 4:26:59 PM

    I'm just gald that we don't have to put with the McCain/Palin lies for much longer!

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:34:32 PM

      8 days of these liars left.
      And their angry mob.

  • Posted By: NickEWI @ 10/27/2008 2:16:40 PM

    I cannot believe the slant you gave this. So if McCain pulls off a win it???s because of racism? What about because the media was totally in favor of Obama and did not give him the treatment they even gave ???Joe the Plumber??? or the treatment of a prescription drug problem of Cindy McCain.

    If you can explain all this I would be more then willing to change my vote for Obama. Luckily I realize there is no way you can do this.

    Why don???t we go into the racial bias of over 90% African-Americans voting for Obama, and normally voting 75-88%$ for Democrats. Reverend Wright and the way he preached and Obama there all of those years, but never heard the hatred.

    I for one am disgusted by this kind of ignorance. I fully believe the media is ignorant and cannot wait for the traditional Print Media to die. Next to fall will be the media that does not report both sides of the issues in the TV studios. Kudos to the reporter in Florida for daring to ask Joe Biden real questions.

    • Posted By: GregAugustaGA @ 10/27/2008 4:04:22 PM

      Nick, If you haven't noticed journalism as we knew it has died during this campaing. You won't find fairness, impartiality, balance, or honesty on either side.

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:32:00 PM

        Especially yours.

  • Posted By: jenndes @ 10/27/2008 3:18:13 PM

    It's so incredibly obvious that nearly every corner of media is on the Obama-agenda and unable to actually report objectively. To epouse that only those who fail to read and educate themselves about the candidates will vote for McCain is not only ludicrous but incredibly egotistical on your part. Who died and made you the All-Knowing of who the educated should be voting for? Coming from someone with a Masters degree, working in the non-profit field and living in NY, with a strong belief that voters should inform themselves on more than listening to and reading short-sighted, slanted media sources, I can hardly wait to vote for McCain on 11/4 - even if almost every media source tells me he doesn't stand a chance. I believe in Democracy - not Socialism and being told how I should vote if I consider myself an "intelligent" person.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 3:44:53 PM

      Reading your post, it looks like the media is spot on.

      • Posted By: busby @ 10/27/2008 4:04:26 PM

        All you can do is attack someone's intelligence who doesn't agree with you. Since you know none of these people, who is close minded and stupid

        • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:26:30 PM

          I really would not call it attacking intelligence would you?

  • Posted By: pulpman0566 @ 10/27/2008 4:24:39 PM

    Oh, and I almost forgot! I'd like to thank you, Mr. Alter, for so completely demonstrating YOUR and, by extension, Newsweak's racism!!! Well played!! Idiots.

  • Posted By: onthefence1 @ 10/27/2008 2:50:00 PM

    To attribute the possibility of an Obama win to race is racist. The simple fact of the matter is that Obama is the least experienced candidate to ever run for presidency since those who penned the constitution and fought for the independence of our nation participated personally. One can hardly blame our founding fathers for having little experience running a new government, but one can hardly overlook the precarious situation that the Democratic Party and fawning press have placed our nation in by promoting one with so little experience in a time of such need. With anti Bush sentiment and eight times the funding of McCain who stuck to principal in accepting public financing, Obama might become our nation???s president. If he does it will be due in large part to racism, slanted journalism and corrupt financing. If McCain wins, it will not be due to race and those who espouse such ludicrous ideas are divisive.

    • Posted By: lockwoodlady @ 10/27/2008 4:22:23 PM

      I'm appalled that you'd say if Obama wins it's because of race, slanted journalism and corrupt finances. Did it ever occur to you that many of us see the value in his vision, his policies and his leadership? Please, show a little respect!

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 3:52:17 PM

      I wonder who you think would be the racists here? Is it the minorities who are the racist, or the majority?Hint. Either answer is wrong. But good luck, your post pretty much defined you. Maybe not as racist - but extremely intolerant.

    • Posted By: cferns1530 @ 10/27/2008 3:10:53 PM

      Moan all you want about Obama. If McCain is so experienced for all his years in the Senate, why is he losing to an inexperienced Obama. Is it because-

      1) McCain has kept pushing for more deregulation and Bush's policies which have got your beloved U.S in a financial, housing mess including Iraq.
      2)He admitted himself he did'nt know much about economics until he suspended his campaign.
      3)He selected bimbo Palin to woo the '18 million cracks' she spoke about.
      4)Was pro-abortion until he was against it in 2000 cos he needed Republican support.
      5)He is using the same Rovian smear tactics to oust Obama which were used by him and the Republican Party of Bush.
      Or
      6)He is plainly not smarter than Obama on answering question and keeps repeating words like 'Maverick' or 'Reform' or 'Drill' to even make a point.

      Personally i think he needs his medication because he seems very AGITATED lately and has been messing up like he did in Western PA.

    • Posted By: Young Hickory @ 10/27/2008 3:08:08 PM

      For your info, "on the fence" is a a figure of speech used to describe someone who is neutral not something that you do for your own sexual pleasure. You are obvious not neutral so keep your sexual habits to yourself.

  • Posted By: ErinRenee @ 10/27/2008 1:01:40 PM

    Since when has it become a crime to be prosperous in this country? I am not for Obama, not because of his race, but because I do not share his policy views. I have heard some of my democrat friends and when we get into it about tax policies, the basic answer I get from them why it's ok to tax more for people who make more, is basically this: "They have enough money already. They need to pay more."
    That comment to me is so aggrevating, mostly because it is usually said with this huge sense of entitlement. I don't understand how you can accept money from the government that came from someone's hard earned paycheck. What's even more aggrevating is that when I give my reason in that I don't want to collect from someone elses money that they worked for, and some even put themselves through years of schooling for, that I just want to keep more of the money that I worked for myself, I get a filthy look like I am stupid and ignorant for saying so. I am so tired of people expecting this government to take care of us like some small, pathetic child. I don't make above $250k a year, but I tell you this, I don't want someone elses money, I just want more of my own. That is a part of why I am not for Obama's run. So, does that make me racist when I cast my ballot for McCain??? The media has lost any shred of integrity and I no longer watch the news as much as I wish I could. I cannot stand this liberal elite society forcing it's opinions and ridicules down my throat. CNN included. I'm done.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 1:11:07 PM

      See. Same thing. Crazy argument based on their own insecurities. "I'm not a racist dammit..."

      • Posted By: ErinRenee @ 10/27/2008 2:17:51 PM

        Please explain in further detail. Thanks.

        • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:11:56 PM

          If I have to explain - you won't get it.

  • Posted By: scpurdue @ 10/27/2008 1:01:53 PM

    Thats a pretty ignorant way of explaining the scenario. You (Alter) seem to be attributing your projected outcome mostly to race and racism and you do so in a very biased way. I would answer this like Ben Stein answered Charles Barkley on Larry King when Charles commented that if Obama loses the election it would be due to racism: Probably 5% of whites will vote McCain based on race while 95% of blacks will vote for Obama simply because he is a Democrat and a black man.

    As a white man I find it offensive that you have to degrade this to a matter of race. I, as well as most whites, have no problem with a black man as president, I do have a problem with misguided or misinformed voters; a president should be elected on the ability to govern so I do share your (again Alter's) view on that matter. My own personal opinion is that both candidates are sub par in that their platforms exist to pull in votes and not be entirely for the benefit of the country.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 1:08:52 PM

      See. It's just the over-hyped who feel the need to bring race into it - like you. At the same time you guys always say someone else brought race into it. Sorry you're so offended. You shouldn't be.

      • Posted By: neeka @ 10/27/2008 2:35:04 PM

        The article is what brought race into it not this reader's comments which are just a reaction to the article.

        • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:11:00 PM

          The article exacerbated it. The bloggers use the false generalization that Dem feel Reps are bigoted because they will not vote for Obama. That is untrue. And if you've followed this site for any period of time - you would know this. Minorities have voted between 92-97 percent for Dems since 1964. The Dems and Reps are "old boys clubs" and I have voted for both - depending on who I thought was the least "the man" "the institution," less judgemental, and for humanity. Don't get me wrong - that was mostly Dems.

  • Posted By: life2go @ 10/27/2008 1:32:48 PM

    I started out this election process (over a year ago) really liking alot of the things I heard about Obama and a lot of what I saw. But it has been him and only him and his actions that turned me away (not his color). Three things really did it for me.

    1. Him going overseas with all his rallies over there, talking to them. Absolutely turned me off. I could understand going and meeting the other politicians, but the huge rallies he held....made me feel like he was going more for a WORLD LEADER position rather than running for the American Presidency.

    2. REMOVING THE AMERICAN FLAG...HE DOESN'T NEED A SYMBOL. IF HE IS RUNNING TO BE MY PRESIDENT THEN THE AMERICAN FLAG IS HIS SYMBOL. There are people out there who seems to think that the American Flag represent all kinds of bad things and ill feelings, if that is how they feel then they can leave. The American Flag represents alot, and some of our history isn't great, but if you don't feel that you still live in the best country with all our freedoms (aleast while we still have them) and that you aren't proud of our flag....THEN GET THE HECK OUT AND LEAVE. And if you are running to be my COMMANDER IN CHIEF, then you better damn well, respect and have no problems with displaying it WITH PRIDE.

    3. And this isn't necessarily him personally, but the whole thing. I am sick and tired of having the race card shoved down my throat....and not sure how I will stomach 4 years, if that is what it comes down to.

    I'm tired that I keep getting told that somehow Reverend Wrights, Bill Ayers, etc... are somehow acceptable. That I am suppose to accept that Rev. Wrights hateful, racist and mean words and attitude are okay and understandable, that I have to understand where he is coming from....WRONG...AIN'T BUYING INTO IT. Mean and hateful is just plain mean and hateful and it is never acceptable from ANYONE FOR ANY REASON.

    Bill Ayers again, hateful and yes, by our definition now a terrorist. One that still doesn't feel bad for what he did and wished he'd done more. Somehow I'm suppose to ignore these facts and that Obama has had numerouse questionable "friendships, working partners" with more than just 1 or 2, not sure what to call them. And then he wants to claim IGNORANCE of their beliefs and thoughts...especially after 20 years...again..NOT BUYING IT.

    These are a few of the reasons why I have already voted for McCain/Palin.

    I'll take the Veteren POW and a hockey mom over 2 MORE LAWYERS running this government...Thank you.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 2:08:24 PM

      You are such a liar. you guys are amusing with the: "I liked Obama, but since fact-check proved the bad things said about him were untrue, I'm going to believe it anyway and vote for McCain, but please don't call me racist"

      You guys are great.

      • Posted By: life2go @ 10/27/2008 2:33:17 PM

        A liar really.....what did I say that was a lie? That I started out liking Obama...TRUTH. What bad things did I say about him that were untrue. He did remove the flag (and how I felt about it, is my right....not what someone else is telling me), he did do rallies (okay lets call them speeches)overseas (still doesn't change how I felt about them) and he has been friends/ associates with questionable people. At first I even respected how he dealt with Rev. Wright, I understood his comment that he was like family and that you don't just up and turn your back on family. Goodness knows we all have skeletons and people we love that do questionable actions, that we don't agree with. Wouldn't necessarily want the world looking at my life through a microscope. Where he lost me was thinking that I was dumb enough to think that in over 20 years of their relationship that HE NEVER KNEW THAT SIDE OF HIM. And that somehow I was suppose to be UNDERSTANDING and ACCEPT where his hateful, raciats and mean comments were coming from. Like I said before, that kind of behavior is never acceptable, from anyone..anytime. NO EXCUSES.

        And I'm not a racist, but the fact that you just called me one AGAIN just goes to prove my point AGAIN and proves me right....you can't say anything about my issues EXCEPT CALL ME A RACIST!!

        Are you not capable of intellectual debate or are you just able to regurgitate what has been feed to you over the last year or so?

        Debate me on the issues I brought up. Tell me your points, tell me where I'm a liar and what point you seem to think I am wrong on. Take a moment, and have an individual thought of your own. HAVE THE 'AUDACITY' TO BE AN INDIVIDUAL!!!!

        • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:04:54 PM

          And I'm not a racist, but the fact that you just called me one AGAIN just goes to prove my point AGAIN and proves me right....you can't say anything about my issues EXCEPT CALL ME A RACIST!!

          Where?
          Don't get me wrong - I think with that amount of sensitivity and false-blogging you probably are, but I did not post it.

        • Posted By: life2go @ 10/27/2008 2:39:05 PM

          COME ON ASKPLUS.... I see your are all about, making short little one liners on others posts, is that all you are capable of....?

          • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:02:45 PM

            No. I have some pretty in-depth ones also. But for the extremely out of touch, I just do a little post-laugh for the smears. You'll note how I respond to you. Seems you guys are a little hard and angry - for no real reason. Not worth lots of time blogging with the unreasonable. Look up five inches. You claimed I called you a bigot when I did not. I laughed at you guys saying you're being called bigots. Period. You don't reason - so you're pretty useless as a blogger. And if you had some common sense, you would take a look at who I "one-line". Bloggers like sharenews, icyeyes, morgan8000 - are just a little off the side of the cliff. What do you think of your - party bloggers? Are they correct in their assessments?

        • Posted By: summer4077 @ 10/27/2008 3:31:30 PM

          You're very right...you didn't lie about anything, just stated your opinions which everyone is entitled to.
          America is the most powerful country on earth--still, even though we are on shaky ground. The leader of this country is very influential around the world and largely affects the global opinion of us. Global opinion of Americans is not good right now, but Obama could change that. He would be a symbol to the world that America is getting back to her progressive values that have always been a beacon of hope and leadership in a harsh world. The world is in a global recession right now and is looking for leadership...that is Obama. So while global opinion isn't going to choose our President, it really is something to be considered. Personally, when I saw the rallies in foreign countries, I was so hopeful for the future. I was proud that they saw an eloquent, intelligent, compassionate man representing America instead of the terror-invoking, bumbling, joke of a President we have now.
          As far as the American flag thing...it's not important to me. Wearing a flag pin doesn't make you any more patriotic than anyone else. It's your actions that show patriotism, not flag waving. So that was never an issue for me, especially considering many of Obama's shirts, bumper stickers, etc DO have the american flag on them. Obama loves his country--his ability to examine its flaws and think of solutions to improve live for the average citizen shows this perfectly.

    • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/27/2008 2:13:02 PM

      That;s true. Obama Biden is like a think tank

  • Posted By: gene08 @ 10/27/2008 2:01:12 PM

    I think your article is not accurate. Do not underestimate the Puma's. The Hillary supporters who are now voting for McCain because Obama stole the primaries.

    • Posted By: not-fooled-by-slick-talking-charlatans @ 10/27/2008 3:06:04 PM

      Please do not bestow yourself as being the voice of Hillary supporters. I personally do not know a single person who would have preferred Clinton as a candidate that would vote for McCain. Such an idea would imply that those who would vote for Sen. Clinton would be voting based on gender instead of based on principles. Since Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama's policy ideas are far more similar than compared to McClain's policy ideas, voting for Obama is a natural choice.

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 3:54:50 PM

        Neither do I. That's why I assume they are lying. All of them.

  • Posted By: NickEWI @ 10/27/2008 2:18:00 PM

    I cannot believe the slant you gave this. So if McCain pulls off a win it???s because of racism? What about because the media was totally in favor of Obama and did not give him the treatment they even gave ???Joe the Plumber??? or the treatment of a prescription drug problem of Cindy McCain.

    If you can explain all this I would be more then willing to change my vote for Obama. Luckily I realize there is no way you can do this.

    Why don???t we go into the racial bias of over 90% African-Americans voting for Obama, and normally voting 75-88%$ for Democrats. Reverend Wright and the way he preached and Obama there all of those years, but never heard the hatred.

    I for one am disgusted by this kind of ignorance. I fully believe the media is ignorant and cannot wait for the traditional Print Media to die. Next to fall will be the media that does not report both sides of the issues in the TV studios. Kudos to the reporter in Florida for daring to ask Joe Biden real questions.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 3:53:22 PM

      Did you notice it's always the Reps defending themselves being racist - while simultaneously bringing race into the equation? Then saying "the liberals" brought it up? Isn't it the liberals who tend to be more progressive and less culturally limited? The one's who prefer not to bring "he not one of us" race into the equation? These guys are all - transparent.

  • Posted By: ConservativeWoman @ 10/27/2008 3:05:55 PM

    How about I won't be voting for Obama because I don't agree with his policies? Or does it mean that on a subconscious level I am a racist? Or am I just one of those LIVs? Seriously, Mr. Alter, you must know that if it weren't for all those doctors' and dentists' offices, no one would even see Newsweek and that doesn't bode well for you. Just think what an Obama presidency will do to the medical profession, between taxing the daylights out of high earners and implementing socialized medicine. Oh happy day.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 3:49:38 PM

      Did you notice it's always the Reps defending themselves being racist - while simultaneously bringing race into the equation? Then saying "the liberals" brought it up? Isn't it the liberals who tend to be more progressive and less culturally limited? The one's who prefer not to bring "he not one of us" race into the equation? These guys are all - transparent.

  • Posted By: jenndes @ 10/27/2008 3:17:08 PM

    It's so incredibly obvious that nearly every corner of media is on the Obama-agenda and unable to actually report objectively. To epouse that only those who fail to read and educate themselves about the candidates will vote for McCain is not only ludicrous but incredibly egotistical on your part. Who died and made you the All-Knowing of who the educated should be voting for? Coming from someone with a Masters degree, working in the non-profit field and living in NY, with a strong belief that voters should inform themselves on more than listening to and reading short-sighted, slanted media sources, I can hardly wait to vote for McCain on 11/4 - even if almost every media source tells me he doesn't stand a chance. I believe in Democracy - not Socialism and being told how I should vote if I consider myself an "intelligent" person.

  • Posted By: onthefence1 @ 10/27/2008 2:49:24 PM

    To attribute the possibility of an Obama win to race is racist. The simple fact of the matter is that Obama is the least experienced candidate to ever run for presidency since those who penned the constitution and fought for the independence of our nation participated personally. One can hardly blame our founding fathers for having little experience running a new government, but one can hardly overlook the precarious situation that the Democratic Party and fawning press have placed our nation in by promoting one with so little experience in a time of such need. With anti Bush sentiment and eight times the funding of McCain who stuck to principal in accepting public financing, Obama might become our nation???s president. If he does it will be due in large part to racism, slanted journalism and corrupt financing. If McCain wins, it will not be due to race and those who espouse such ludicrous ideas are divisive.

  • Posted By: cferns1530 @ 10/27/2008 2:41:14 PM

    McCain is a joke as much as his speech and VP nomination is. I tired to listen to his last speech for any signs of his policies and all he did was attack Obama and punctuate his speech every few seconds with 'My Friends'. He's said about anything and everything possible to patronize Americans but continued to negate Obama by sowing doubt. SAD.
    What is funny though is his big F**K UP in West Penn. With all the booing the crowd just went silent like 'What the hell did he say?" Priceless!

  • Posted By: ErinRenee @ 10/27/2008 2:22:43 PM

    Since when has it become a crime to be prosperous in this country? I am not for Obama, not because of his race, but because I do not share his policy views. I have heard some of my democrat friends and when we get into it about tax policies, the basic answer I get from them why it's ok to tax more for people who make more, is basically this: "They have enough money already. They need to pay more."
    That comment to me is so aggrevating, mostly because it is usually said with this huge sense of entitlement. I don't understand how you can accept money from the government that came from someone's hard earned paycheck. What's even more aggrevating is that when I give my reason in that I don't want to collect from someone elses money that they worked for, and some even put themselves through years of schooling for, that I just want to keep more of the money that I worked for myself, I get a filthy look like I am stupid and ignorant for saying so. I am so tired of people expecting this government to take care of us like some small, pathetic child. I don't make above $250k a year, but I tell you this, I don't want someone elses money, I just want more of my own. That is a part of why I am not for Obama's run. So, does that make me racist when I cast my ballot for McCain??? The media has lost any shred of integrity and I no longer watch the news as much as I wish I could. I cannot stand this liberal elite society forcing it's opinions and ridicules down my throat. CNN included. I'm done.

    • Posted By: Young Hickory @ 10/27/2008 2:40:50 PM

      Please don't drive on the public roads if you don't want any of other people's money because I guarantee you that your tax contribution alone would not build that road. Again, I reiterate, since you don't want any help, please don't use public roads or libraries or hospitals or airports. In fact, please just leave the country period.

  • Posted By: Kboogie @ 10/27/2008 2:31:17 PM

    During the 2000 campaign, on MSNBC's "Hardball", a young woman asked McCain why her father, a doctor, should be "penalized" by being in a huge tax bracket. McCain replied that "wealthy people can afford more", and that, "the very wealthy, because they can afford tax lawyers and all kinds of loopholes, really don't pay nearly as much as you think they do." The exchange continued:

    Young woman: Are we getting closer and closer to, like, socialism and stuff?. . .
    McCain: Here's what I really believe: That when you reach a certain level of comfort, there's nothing wrong with paying somewhat more.

    WOW!!!! I think McCain has forgotten his old beliefs. Sounds a little like...........hmmmm.........SOCIALISM!!

    What a joke this guy is!!

  • Posted By: zenoreo @ 10/27/2008 1:30:56 PM

    Time FOR SOME STRAIGHT TALK!!
    Okay, I'm a Republican by ideology. In fact, I???m a rare breed of Republican ??? I???m highly educated, smart, insightful, successful and very cultured.
    I???m QUESTIONING that out of all great GOP leaders in our party, the BEST CHOICE was McCain ? And Palin?
    McCain is an OLD fool that does not seem to be in his right mind. McCain cannot even keep his own set of lies straight, or even seem to know where or what he is doing at present !
    And for his judgment, just one word ??? Palin!
    Come on, Palin !
    Palin is a train wreck; SPIN any which way you want she is a HUGH mistake!
    Palin is an embarrassment to professional women, the state of Alaska, the GOP and to America.
    Is this the BEST my party can do?
    WHO EVER is running the show at the GOP, needs his/her head examined?
    AND FOR THE RECORD G.W.Bush is much more qualified to be president than McCain or Palin !
    Bush was just a little stupid, and that???s not a crime in America, because if being stupid was a crime then 93% of people in America should be locked up !
    One final word, I cannot believe that the GOP has become so BADLY misguided that the ONLY SUPPORTERS we really have are the WACKOS and FREAKS !
    Only a couple of years ago, those were the types of people we called Democrats, and NOW there are Republicans ??? the losers of society !
    Colin Powell, my apologies, I was anger at you, but NOW I understand you !

    • Posted By: NickEWI @ 10/27/2008 2:21:44 PM

      You are no Republican. You are spewing the Liberal view. First Not all Republicans are Whacs just as all LIberals are not UnAmerican.

  • Posted By: 4astrongamerica @ 10/27/2008 2:21:31 PM

    I am encouraged in my support for McCain after reading the posts today. It seems as though there are more of you out there that are willing to really examine the candidates' records, their proposed policies and reject the idea that we should all blindly vote for Obama because he gives a good speech. I am glad to see that conservatives and moderates are finally beginning to stand up against the notion that we are racist, haters or divisive if we choose to vote for a candidate that supports our beliefs.

  • Posted By: dtharter @ 10/27/2008 2:13:02 PM

    Thanks for the scary Halloween story.

    I think your assessment of Virginia is not particularly accurate, because it leaves out where I live in southeastern Virginia. True, the Norfolk/Portsmouth/Virginia Beach area is somewhat conservative, but many of the people here you would expect to vote for McCain are going Obama; some because of Obama's sensibility, some because of McCain's lack thereof.

    There isn't the fear of brown-skinned people here that you might expect. The African-American population in this region is largely polite, church-going, and hard-working. Of course there are exceptions, but they are relatively few and far between. Many white people in this region have a modest respect for their brown-skinned brothers and sisters, all past history aside.

    The military population here also hurts the Republican ticket. The Republicans have been irresponsible about and ungrateful to their military during these last eight years. Our men and women of the armed forces are fighting without adequate protection and with no exit strategy. McCain made his statement about "another fifty years, another hundred years." It has reflected badly.

    Virginia has been going bluer and bluer in past years. I believe this year will be no exception. Our once solid red Commonwealth has elected two consecutive popular blue governors, one blue Senator, and another prospective blue Senator (former governor Mark Warner) is leading in the polls. I think this election will see Virginia going solid blue.

  • Posted By: ThinkFirstThenVote @ 10/27/2008 12:38:05 AM

    Let's not overlook the fact that Republicans are suing to throw out thousands of votes in Lake County, that they shortened hours for voting in democratic counties in Florida, that it's been demonstrated on Fox and CNN and in the documentary "Hacking Democracy" that votes can be flipped as is already happening in 3 states.

    After encouraging a new generation (and re-inspiring an older generation) to believe again--this election will be stolen. And the puppetmasters of our current corrupt administration will continue their string pulling.

    James Dobson and Stephen Strang (who wrote a vile e-mail to his readership insinuating that if Barack Obama were elected boy scouts wouldn't be able to sleep safely in their tents--like any of the molesters of Boy Scouts have been deterred by the fact that there have been Republican presidents for 30 of the last 40 years) will claim victory.

    And Rupert Murdoch and the ruling class will toast Sean (Goebbels) Hannity and Rush Limbaugh and all those e-mail strategists for a job well done.

    • Posted By: billysid57 @ 10/27/2008 12:52:00 AM

      No worries, ACORN will more than make up the difference!

      • Posted By: rapidron @ 10/27/2008 1:57:15 AM

        You know they investigated ACRON and didn't find anything. What am I saying--of course you heard that and are ignoring it. choosing to be an ignorant tool.

        P.S. McCain ENDORSED ACORN BEFORE BE STARTED THE FEAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST IT--LOL!!!

        • Posted By: billysid57 @ 10/27/2008 2:23:50 AM

          OH REALLY I THINK YOU'RE A TOOL TOO -- ROTFL!!! :)

          Now I have to to take a shower to get your dreck off me.

          • Posted By: rapidron @ 10/27/2008 2:43:52 AM

            I love how your posts show how lacking in intelligent discourse you are. Why don't you go read about this election and come back with something actually substantial and that makes sense--or at least let's you make an argument of some kind. And yes, not knowing what you're talking about and allowing others to manipulate you with fear and hate makes you a tool.

            • Posted By: billysid57 @ 10/27/2008 2:57:23 AM

              Oh really, ACRON??? or did you mean ACORN? aha, you misspelled something so that makes you uninformed and a complete tool too, right?

              • Posted By: LDJ Alabama @ 10/27/2008 12:21:57 PM

                Good one billysid57! Touche'!

                • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 2:11:26 PM

                  Actually, it was not a good one. It was attacking the messenger and not the topic - again.

        • Posted By: 4astrongamerica @ 10/27/2008 12:04:52 PM

          Are you kidding? They have found plenty and there are still ongoing investigations as there are of them in every election. Investigations in 14 states and counting. There have already been ACORN employees that have been sent to prison for the same kind of voter fraud that is taking place now.

        • Posted By: dianal @ 10/27/2008 7:37:55 AM

          Oh, you mean the dogs looked for the poop in the yard and barked that there was none? I'm so impressed! But, what is that stink then?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse