Why McCain Won

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: GregAugustaGA @ 10/27/2008 3:07:18 PM

    Now that's the far left elitist Jonathan Alter we have all come to know so well. Striking with the old preemptive strike that IF Obama loses it is ALL because of race and the racists that live among us. You are forgetting the moderate Democrats that have never supported Obama. Not because of race but because we find him too liberal, too inexperienced, have always questioned his assiciations and his paltry explainations since Reverend Wright, and so called "new kind of politics" mantra. I find this ironic from a man of Chicago where they invented dirty politics. There are many other reasons not to support Obama other than race alter. Nice preemptive try though.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 3:48:19 PM

      Not that bright - again.

      • Posted By: GregAugustaGA @ 10/27/2008 4:00:34 PM

        Please don't condemn yourself in that manner. But, that does seem to be all you have to say. As for "bringing" race and racist" up. It was Mr. Alter and you can't get more far left leaning liberal than him.

        • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:28:58 PM

          With every reply, you guys pretty much rest my case. Have you stopped to think that people who are "liberal", e.g. open-minded, free-thinking, peaceful, non-judgemental - like being that way? Hope is not a four-letter word angry blogger. Sorry.

          • Posted By: Dromara @ 10/27/2008 10:32:13 PM

            I believe you are to stupid to see the irony in your inane remarks.

            • Posted By: GregAugustaGA @ 10/28/2008 3:27:59 PM

              Thank you for proving my point beyond the shadow of a doubt. I find you guilty as charged of being judgemental, angry, closed minded, and vile in your expressions.

              • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/28/2008 3:59:17 PM

                And your warm words prove you are a man amongst men. An American treasure built on a foundation of understanding, fairness - and open-mindedness. A blessed man who is not angry, and loves humanity as he would love his own family.

                Those harsh words were just a disguise to throw of the angry Republicans.
                Please keep posting.

          • Posted By: pulpman0566 @ 10/28/2008 8:54:41 AM

            hahahahahah- liberals are open-minded. hahahahahahaha. That's hysterical. An open mind is an empty mind. You know who said that? A liberal! Yeah, ACORN is really open-minded by registeriing Mickey Mouse and a bunch of Dallas Cowboy players in Nevada of all places. So, let me get this straight. the party that championed the civil rights movement (the dems - real American dems) which had one person/one vote as its foundation is now, through ACORN, trying to undermine that very principal by registering people illegally. My, how "open minded" of you! And Murtha is sure "open-minded" by calling his own district racists and then apologizing by call them red-necks! Well done! And Ted Kenneddy (The Swimmah) is sure open-minded about wind farms - just not off the coast of Nantucket so his sailing isn't ruined. And Kerry was sure open-minded about the war in Iraq when he was "for it before he was against it". You libs are all a bunch of hypocritical phonies. But never mind that. The really hilarious thing is that the radical jihadists in this world would kill all the liberals first! hahahaha- so, go ahead. Be my guest. Be "open minded". What a bunch of clap-trap that is. In my next post I'll school you on how "open minded" Pelosi and Reid are.

            • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/28/2008 3:56:14 PM

              Pure genius on display:

              Posted By: pulpman0566 @ 10/28/2008 8:54:41 AM
              Comment: hahahahahah- liberals are open-minded. hahahahahahaha. That's hysterical. An open mind is an empty mind. You know who said that? A liberal! Yeah, ACORN is really open-minded by registeriing Mickey Mouse and a bunch of Dallas Cowboy players in Nevada of all places. So, let me get this straight. the party that championed the civil rights movement (the dems - real American dems) which had one person/one vote as its foundation is now, through ACORN, trying to undermine that very principal by registering people illegally. My, how "open minded" of you! And Murtha is sure "open-minded" by calling his own district racists and then apologizing by call them red-necks! Well done! And Ted Kenneddy (The Swimmah) is sure open-minded about wind farms - just not off the coast of Nantucket so his sailing isn't ruined. And Kerry was sure open-minded about the war in Iraq when he was "for it before he was against it". You libs are all a bunch of hypocritical phonies. But never mind that. The really hilarious thing is that the radical jihadists in this world would kill all the liberals first! hahahaha- so, go ahead. Be my guest. Be "open minded". What a bunch of clap-trap that is. In my next post I'll school you on how "open minded" Pelosi and Reid are.


              An open mind is an - open mind.
              You're not that bright.

          • Posted By: GregAugustaGA @ 10/28/2008 8:33:10 AM

            Non judgemental???? You MUST be kidding. You sis have solidified your ignorance and stupidity. The Obamanists are the most judgemental bunch I have witnessed in my 55 years on this earth. The lies, anger, venom, and total closed minded approach to everything. You are kidding right? Nobody can be that dumb and function in society.

    • Posted By: Young Hickory @ 10/27/2008 3:38:08 PM

      I don't think you are racist because you aren't voting for Obama, that just makes you stupid. I do think you are racist because you are from Augusta, Georgia. I am from Alabama and that place makes us look progressive.

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 3:47:46 PM

        Did you notice it's always the Reps defending themselves being racist - while simultaneously bringing race into the equation? Then saying "the liberals" brought it up? Isn't it the liberals who tend to be more progressive and less culturally limited? The one's who prefer not to bring "he not one of us" race into the equation? These guys are all - transparent.

        • Posted By: pulpman0566 @ 10/28/2008 9:05:07 AM

          AskPlus,

          You need to take a history lesson. The Democratic Party has cornered the market on racism. Are you friggin' kidding me? The Republican Party is the PARTY OF LINCOLN - you know, the dude who signed the Emancipation Proclamation. But, on to more modern day themes. Ever take a look at President Bush's cabinet? Notice any blacks? women? hispanics? I thought so. And, guess who said this -"President Bush has done more for Africa than any other president". That was Bob Geldof - not exactly a stalwart of conservative thinking. Oh, ever notice Bono traveling around with Paulson on African debt relief?

          The problem with you libs? You aren't comfortable enough in your own skin to, as MLK put it, judge a person by the content of his character and not by the color of his skin. I'm just guessin here but I'm pretty sure MLK meant that both ways.

          If a person is a scumbag he's a scumbag REGARDLESS of whether he's black, white, green, yellow, red, or any other color. That's the colorless society MLK dreamed of, worked for and died for. Take these to scumbag white supremists from Tennesse plotting to kill Obama. Both of them - scumbags. Ought to be tried by a jury of their peers and, if convicted beyond a reasonable doubt, sentenced to the full extent of the law up to and including capitol punishment. That's how it works!

        • Posted By: ConservativeWoman @ 10/27/2008 4:22:09 PM

          Criticizing opponents by calling them stupid is right out of the leftist playbook. How about countering with facts instead of baseless attacks?

          • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:31:06 PM

            Although I question some of the academics on this page, I did not call you stupid. I understand how you may have been raised and hope one day you will expand. But I doubt you're stupid.

  • Posted By: indi1216 @ 10/28/2008 3:48:01 PM

    stop this nonsense and vote for O bama already...All young voters go vote history of our life time.

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/28/2008 3:12:27 PM

    Obama has 63 Nobel Laureates working on his policy team. They are developing a plan to push America back to the top. Who is responsible for McCain's planning? Americans would be shocked to find that Douglas Holtz-Eakin is the sole person responsible for planning McCain's policy for America's future. Holtz-Eakin is also McCain's economic advisor, filling two full time positions on McCain's team. How can one single man (an economist) be responsible for developing a viable technology plan for our future? Obama has an enormous pool of the most intelligent, talented men and women in America working for him. Soon, they will be working for US.

    And let's not forget that the McCain campaign spent more on Palin's makeup artist than it did on it's foreign policy advisor. When you pay your makeup artist DOUBLE what you pay your foreign policy advisor, it is time to start examining your priorities.

    You look just fine without makeup, John. And Sarah is young enough not to need any. So cut the crap, and start paying some good ECONOMIC ADVISORS so you can have a fiscal plan to present to America. We're in the middle of a huge global financial meltdown, and you are worried about hair and makeup? PLEASE start worrying about the middle class, John. Please.

    • Posted By: Skallywag @ 10/28/2008 3:44:29 PM

      Oh stop with this spew already.

  • Posted By: Newsybopper @ 10/28/2008 3:39:01 PM

    If somehow this country falls for McCain/Palin hate and fear tatics, than God help this country. What would be the problem with a fillibuster free congress? We had the same thing for 6 years under Bush. They messed it up BIG time by putting us in two wars, and a crisis so big it is killing jobs and businesses as we speak.
    Why isn't everyone talking about what has happened already and so concerned about what might happen with the Democrats? Can we honestly get any worse off ? Why not let them try and if we don't like the results in 4 years we can vote them OUT! It's not like this is the END of free speech or our ability to VOTE! And if you are so worried, WHY aren't you thinking about what would happen under Sarah Palin? Talk about the Middle East "testing us"? Are you kidding? She couldn't even explain what "preconditions' are in her interview where "Daddy John" wouldn't let her be alone to interview for more than 5 minutes!! How is she possibly going to be able to talk with Leaders of other countries!! Remember, my friends, (as John always says) he IS 72 yrs. old, and looking like this has taken a REAL toll on him , AND he has serious cancer FOUR times!!
    If he does somehow get in....I for one will consider moving to one of the REAL "socialist" countries where Health and preventive care are FREE and they have escaped war with other countries for centuries. Why shouldn't we look at France where the common people revolt and the Govt. gives in. Why? Because it truly is run by the people.....FOR the people!! My feeling...if ALL the other democratic nations are doing it....why do WE feel it is soooooo terrible? Our way certainly hasn't worked!!!

  • Posted By: ariziowa @ 10/28/2008 3:03:27 PM

    Yes - "a brave new world". What nonsense. Well, of course, unless he is the "second coming"! He may even think that - yes, that is quite scary. I guess, what really ticks me off sometimes, is that Democrats blame everything on President Bush. I sprained my ankle yesterday - it's Bush's fault!

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/28/2008 3:38:25 PM

      Have you noticed the only party calling Obama the "second coming" is the Rep party? I'm just saying.

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/28/2008 3:12:08 PM

    Here's a video in which Obama discusses fiscal responsibility. Anyone who cares about the economy should see it.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d4a6RNhCUo

    On this web page, you can calculate the amount of your TAX RELIEF under Obama's plan (This tax calculator is for personal income, not for businesses. Remember that if you itemize, your tax cut will be higher than what the calculator shows. However, Obama's new 1040EZ allows people to get credit for some itemizations without having to fill out the long form and schedules.)

    http://taxcut.barackobama.com/

    You can get even more information on Obama's economic policies from the Blueprint for Change.

    http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

  • Posted By: Skallywag @ 10/28/2008 1:09:00 PM

    I sit here and read the various posts from so many of the camp followers. You deserve what you get. It's just very sad that you drag the rest of us down with you. You all support your candidate with pride and fully believe what your political party tells you. Pat yourselves on the head, give yourselves a bone and scratch behind your ears, good doggies. Not one of you can see the fact that both political parties want you to be bickering and griping at each other about the candidates. While you are fighting over the bone, they are sneaking away with the prize - control over what you will be able to do with your life. No matter who of these two were to win the election, it will be disaster for this country. The political parties have wanted it this way for the last 60 years. Both parties have the same philosophy - Keep the public bickering between each other and they won't be paying attention to what government really does. Proof - just look at the way the government says they want education to be good, but in reality don't do anything to really educate the people (educated people are dangerous to politicians. So many of you don't even know how our government is supposed to work. Listening to the campaign ads, you would think that whomever is elected will just go ahead and change things by making decrees about new rules and laws, It doesn't work that way folks....If American's are smart, NOBODY will vote for either BHO or MCC. But watch, on election day we will see how many millions of you are morons.

    • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/28/2008 2:17:59 PM

      That is a brilliant post. Now I know why the DNC and party elites snubbed Hillary. She threatened the government's "Brave New World."

  • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/27/2008 10:43:40 AM

    I have had it ! As a loyal democrat for 25 years, I have been trying to warm up to Obama all summer and fall. Concerns people have about Obama have to do with his limited national exposure, NOT his race. Obama is doing well in the polls becuase of the economic downturn, and the blame for that is going to the republicans. Every time I make a comment that is not completely in lock step with the most left wing liberal Obama supporters on this blog, I am accused of being racist, ignorant, narrow minded, etc., and those are the nicer comments. If you want to persuade moderates into voting for Obama STOP INSULTING THEM

    • Posted By: LDJ Alabama @ 10/27/2008 9:26:37 PM

      Hey News, by any chance are you BIPOLAR? You seem to always contradict yourself. Hmmm...

      • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/28/2008 2:15:33 PM

        There is absolutely no contradiction in my statements. Everything in the above paragraph is true, I merely don't follow the herd of the extreme left wing of my party. I don't know why the DNC and party elites passed over the best candidate we had in 40 years for a virtual unknown. Having areas of loyal dissodance with your own party is not bipolar, it shows broad based thinking.

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 12:51:32 PM

      Have you noticed the only one's talking about race are the Reps. You won't find many liberal opinions who even care about you - or desire to talk about race to angry, low-minded bloggers. You're type of behavior and limited views are not important. And you definitely aren't Dem.

      • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/27/2008 2:21:16 PM

        Actually tons of liberal responses accuse anyone who thinks differently than them of being a racist. You appear to be a narrow democrat. I am more broad based, and not locked into the super liberal bias that tossed Hillary out of the race. I am a proud democrat, but I'm not proud of judgemental dismissive democrats like you

        • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:21:53 PM

          That is the definition again of close-minded or - Rep. But, the "liberals" have noted that Reps keep calling them close-minded. It's a liberal trait right? Right? Or, is that a conservative trait? I'm confused.

          • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/27/2008 5:38:41 PM

            Both extremes are closed minded but in very different ways. Truthfully I can't tell which is worse. Moderate democrats like me usually get insulted by both

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/27/2008 4:31:59 PM

    Who is bested suited to lead in these difficult times? The two candidates have had to deal with both a major presidential level decision and a global crisis in the past couple months.

    We just witnessed as good a side by side crisis test as you could ask for. Both candidates had to respond to the global financial meltdown, which John's campaign manager Rick Davis called "the worst financial crisis in our nation's history." It was John McCain who was late to recognize what was happening and then couldn't figure out how to respond. He made a dramatic show of suspending his campaign because he knew he needed to seize the initiative politically, but then didn't seem to have any coherent position once he took charge. It doesn't inspire confidence when you say you're going to do something and then back down within days.

    On the critical matter of selecting a VP who would step into the Presidency in an emergency, John McCain gives us an unintelligent mediocrity without knowledge or experience in national and international issues. Palin clearly was chosen to fire up the religious right base, but she has little appeal to the vast swath of America. Obama's VP pick is Sentor Joe Biden, who clearly has foreign policy chops and could legitimately step into the Oval Office should the need arise.

    John's horrendous POW experience did nothing to prepare him for the job of president. A captive soldier must cope with a situation in which he has no control and can decide nothing. A President of the United States must make good decisions over and over again. Barack Obama has demonstrated the intelligence, calmness and good judgment we so desperately need in a leader for these troubled times. He has been tested repeatedly in this marathon campaign and he has risen to meet every challenge, sticking to his message of hope and change, and not falling into the low-life mud slinging we have seen from McCain.

    Obama has better judgement, better temperament, better manners and better ideas that John McCain. I'm a middle-aged white female Christian Republican, and I am voting for Barack Obama.

    • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/27/2008 5:25:03 PM

      I'm not a McCain supporter, but he doesn't do anything for political gain. The compassionate immigration bill he co-sponsored with Ted Kennedy in 2007 almost sank his campaign. Also, Obama NEEDED to put Hillary on the ticket, but rather than put our needs first, he didn't want to work hand in hand with someone he doesn't like. I thought the next president had to work hand in hand with people he didn;t like EVERY DAY. Thirdly, McCain is nothing short of a national hero for his POW service.
      Obama does everything for political expediency, he picked the wrong VP, and he has no military record.
      There are plenty of policy issues to criticize McCain on, but these three make Obama look just as bad

      • Posted By: Nins @ 10/27/2008 6:45:24 PM

        McCain's stance on immigration was nothing but political posing. He most definitely was angling for the Hispanic vote by supporting softer immigration laws. But you know what, Hispanics can read, and they found out that McCain's "support" for immigration was all hot air. Because on every immigration bill that was pro-immigrant, McCain either voted against it or refused to vote at all.

        To say that McCain never has done ANYTHING out of political expediency is ridiculous. His choice of Sarah Palin had "pander to the base" written all over it.

        Incidentally, I don't think it is totally wrong for McCain to do what is politically expedient. Sometimes, that is necessary for any politician. What I object to is you stating that McCain, the war hero, could NEVER stoop to such a thing. Get a grip.

        IS he a war hero? Sure, he suffered mightily, but he admits he didn't change course when the warning buzzer told him there was a missile on his tail. He got shot down because he was playing cowboy and didn't follow the rules. Not to mention the fact that McCain admits in his autobiography that he committed treason by collaborating with the enemy in Vietnam. After he returned to the US, he was so depressed about this that he nearly committed suicide. (Read it for yourself in his autobiography.)

        Again, I don't judge McCain for this. I think 98% of all prisoners would break under torture, and I don't hold him to a higher standard. And most POWs experience severe depression. However, I really can't think of him as a "war hero," given what he has said about himself and his conduct during the war.

        • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/28/2008 2:11:59 PM

          I am not a McCain proponent, I was merely pointing out that there are more influential ways to criticize him than by using those three issues. Some of what he does may turn out to be politically expedient, but that is never his motive. McCain didn't just support the immigration bill, he CO-WROTE it with Ted Kennedy, and it damn near ended his campaign. No, I don't need to get a grip, I have one.
          McCain is a war hero. I don't need to go back to the specifics of what exactly happened 35 or 40 years ago to know that, especially since so few detail are available about Obama's past.

    • Posted By: pulpman0566 @ 10/27/2008 4:36:11 PM

      ...and after you do so strike "Republican" and insert "Socialist". Hey, it's your vote, your wallet and, unfortunately, OUR security at stake but do what you feel is right. God Bless.

      • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/27/2008 5:47:37 PM

        You may not agree with Obama's plan to tax the wealthy and provide hand outs to those who pay no income taxes. However, to call him socialist really is a stretch. I don't agree with the hand out part of the plan, but his motivation for doing so is pure. He has stated his plan,it is what it is, and you can agree or not agree. But to call it socialism is a complete misnomer

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/27/2008 4:48:59 PM

        "Socialist" is a 50's and 60's negative political ploy - and real socialist can't stand a two-party system and would never vote for Obama. Socialist is on an outline created by the "last chance" brigade to be disseminated by the lower educated to the very intolerant, who want to make people more intolerant. Kind of like "he's not one of us". But you are a really good carrier. You and "now for the DOOF" should get a gold star.

  • Posted By: neocon @ 10/28/2008 9:11:06 AM

    Obama said, "The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society.

    "It's not that I want to punish your success," Obama explained. "I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they've got a chance for success too. My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody ... I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."
    Senator Obama's plan puts a gun at the heads of those earning over $500,000 and forces them to simply hand their earnings to those who have not earned it. Indeed, there is something very troubling about such a concept, and as Simpson also notes, if this weren't the government forcing those redistributions we would be filing extortion charges against the person holding the gun.

    • Posted By: News and Notes @ 10/28/2008 2:04:50 PM

      Once it hits mainstream that tape could be really devastating

  • Posted By: tiredoflies @ 10/28/2008 1:57:53 PM

    For eight years, Bush and the republicans have conditioned America to be afraid and live in fear. They are now playing Americans for all they can get out of that fear card.

    Fear and smear is how the republicans gain POWER and CONTROL OVER THE PEOPLE. LIES, DISTORTIONS AND EXAGGERATIONS are the tools they use to accomplish their purpose. This is what we are seeing right now.

    If they make it, once again when the election is over, all the peon voters will be cast to the wayside and power, money and indifference to the middle and lower class will reign once again. We will be stuck for four or eight more years of the past.

  • Posted By: ariziowa @ 10/28/2008 1:53:44 PM

    Yes, I love "hall of the mountain king"! Well, Barry has more money than God - and George Soros, is close to that. Yes, Barry is the Messiah!

  • Posted By: Boyd Waggoner @ 10/28/2008 1:03:20 PM

    The country NEEDS Obama to win, and put our people back to work.

    In the 3rd and last debate, the moderator (Bob Schieffer) outlined the recent economic plans of the two candidates. McCain???s economic proposal was new tax cuts for capital gains (primarily a tax cut for the wealthy) and Obama???s included tax breaks to CREATE JOBS, and public works to CREATE JOBS. Obama is focused on JOB CREATION.

    So it is no surprise that the cold hard truth, devoid of opinion, is that the Democratic Party Presidents ALWAYS create more jobs than Republican Party Presidents. A few examples:
    1. THE LAST 75 YEARS-12 Presidents in all-the six Democratic Presidents were the six BEST job creators, and the six Republican Presidents were the six WORST job creators
    2. THE LAST 60 YEARS-Democratic Presidents averaged 188,000 jobs monthly, and Republican Presidents averaged 89,000 monthly, a difference of 99,000 monthly. The Democrats averaged a job SURPLUS and the Republicans averaged a job DEFICIT in comparison with what is necessary for population growth (around 140,000 monthly).
    2. THE LAST 19 YEARS-BUSH-CLINTON-BUSH-Clinton averaged 237,000 jobs monthly, and each Bush averaged 54,000 monthly, a 4 to 1 advantage for the Democrat over the Republicans. The last tow Republican Presidents (Bush and Bush) have been the TWO WORST IN THE PAST 75 YEARS. Why would you expect McCain to be different?
    You can check these facts at www.waggonerpost.com, (including graphs) or from the ???horse???s mouth???, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Government.
    Are we gonna let the Republicans bamboozle us again? 7 times out of 7 times?

    • Posted By: Skallywag @ 10/28/2008 1:34:38 PM

      This country needs BHO (or MCC) about as much as we all need a bad case of the runs.

  • Posted By: Skallywag @ 10/28/2008 1:30:09 PM

    The election is held so close to Hallows Eve because it's so scary - the demons zombies and manufactured people that are presented to the public as candidates. Then what is even scarier, the blind faith followership that will actually vote for them. It's the scariest story ever told! The only thing that can keep these evil spirits at bay is the truth!

  • Posted By: NewsWkDickG @ 10/28/2008 12:48:48 PM

    If they can keep us concerned about problems of being too 'liberal', then they have us distracted and looking the wrong way. The drastic problems we now have are because of the greed and dishonesty of a few, because of our government's focus on benefit for Special Interests and a select few, because of our government's deceptive and irresponsible neglect of any concern for the majority, and with all of it being because of the power and pressure from a few, rationalized as ???conservative??? thinking. If it takes someone with a more ???liberal??? view to turn things around, then we better bring them on. We need to realize McCain and Palin simply don???t offer anything but more of the same. They talk of change but offer nothing specific, only empty rhetoric. What McCain does change is his position frequently. First he brags that he shares Bush???s philosophy and that he voted with Bush 90% of the time and in-between he says that he isn???t Bush, that Bush???s policies failed, that he is different and will provide change from Bush. We have actually seen him change multiple times almost each day as the economic crisis unfolded, always worried about political advantage instead of finding real answers. McCain is really not convincing as he is either unsure and tentative or impulsive and poorly thought out without any real answers and only criticizes Obama who in contrast does confidently present detailed plans. McCain vacillates between his need to convince his 'conservative' base and trying to manipulate the voters with the most likely result being that he would just provide more of the same; the same Bush-Cheney style failed 'conservative' policies that he has supported all along. We really can???t take more of the same, whatever you want to call it!

  • Posted By: 2967sophie @ 10/27/2008 8:59:34 PM

    The reason I am not voting for Obama is NOT the color of his skin. I disagree with every one of his policies. I believe that he will lead us into Socialism. I have scary news for you.......I have talked to numerous Democrats who are voting Republican for the very firs time in their lives. They all say that they could never vote for Obama. Keep that in mind as the election approaches.

    • Posted By: emp726 @ 10/28/2008 12:19:50 PM

      Lead us into Socialism? I have news for everyone who's so terrified of a supposedly American "socialist" future... WE ALREADY HAVE SOCIALISM IN THIS COUNTRY YOU IDIOT! What do you the police, fire, mail and public school systems are... They are socialist programs!! And now, under Bush and the republicans, we are socializing the banking system. And you're afraid that Obama and his supposed socialist tendacies?!?! Wake up!

  • Posted By: TGTTEO @ 10/28/2008 3:38:36 AM

    If Obama loses it will not be because of the color of his skin, it will more likely be because of the bigness of his mouth. There are many who love to hear him speak but there are more who do not. He comes across as an angry black man who has an axe to grind. His followers swoon over his every word, no different from any cult leaders who move their followers to die for them. Obama is a cold and calculated man. McCain disappoints before the election but if elected Obama will surely disappoint after election. With his very limited experience he sees the world and everything before him in black and white, everything is very simple. But talk is cheap. Promises will get him elected. But the mountain of problems he faces coupled with the in-fighting amongst the thousands of advisers and supporters who help him get to the White House will break him. After whipping up so much anger and hatred between hard core Democrats and hard core Republicans and with the financial crisis and economic downturn thrown in, Americans are in for years of hardship. And Obama will continue in the next 4 years blaming George W Bush for his inability to keep his promises while Americans continue to suffer.

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 10/28/2008 12:07:06 PM

      I have no idea how you could watch ANY of Obama's speeches and see anger. His speeches are focused on hope, empowerment of the middle class, reducing fear, and making positive changes by working together as Americans. McCain, on the other hand, has widely been criticized for coming across as harsh, angry, and eager to fight. His approach is what sealed the deal for an Obama presidency.

  • Posted By: sgarrisonNC @ 10/28/2008 11:38:22 AM

    This type of media bias INFURIATES me. I don't mean the "what if McCain wins (wink, wink)" topic. I mean the irresponsible assumption that permeates this entire article - that the only reason a white American of "common sense and decency" would vote for John McCain is that s/he is a bigot. How dare you! This election is not about a choice between a wonderful candidate and a woeful one. It is, as it has been my entire voting lifetime, a choice between the lesser of evils. There are many thinking citizens who have carefully considered both candidates and have chosen John McCain - because of their evaluation of his health care plan, his economic ideas (especially his plan to use some of the bailout money to directly rescue homeowners rather than Wall Street), his knowledge of international relations and his experience in national-level government. Do not condescend to smugly assume my decision is based on race solely because I have reached a different conclusion than you!

  • Posted By: sgarrisonNC @ 10/28/2008 11:31:45 AM

    This kind of journalism INFURIATES me. I don't mean the "what if McCain wins (wink, wink)" question. I mean the grossly inaccurate assumption that permeates the entire peace - that a white American of common sense and decency would not vote for McCain unless they are a bigot. How dare you! This election is not about a decision between a wonderful candidate and a woeful one. It is, as always in my lifetime, a choice between the lesser of two evils. There are many thinking citizens in this country who have looked at the two possibilities and reluctantly chosen John McCain, and their decisions are based on their evaluation of his health plan, his economic ideas (especially his plan to use part of the financial bailout to benefit homeowners rather than wall street), his knowledge of world affairs and his experience in our national government. That is the decision that I have reluctantly made.

  • Posted By: josemarti @ 10/28/2008 10:54:39 AM

    Germany again warns American voters. Martin Borman the mayor of Munich said today that Americans will face a hostile Europe should they fail to elect Mr. Obama. "Germans have always recognized the advantages of having a grandiose, thuggish, demagogue as their Leader. Should Americans fail to elect Mr. Obama they will reap the whirlwind. Germany will not stand idle"

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse