What Have We Created?!

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/26/2008 6:41:09 PM

    THE GREAT BUSH DEPRESSION
    I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.
    He perfectly predicted the current meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen next
    is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.
    The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide ,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch , Fanny and Freddy Mae ,AIG
    The government took them over because they are bankrupt. Even with the goverment nationalizing hundreds of billions of dollars in debt the stock market is crashing
    the credit markets are frozen and all of us may suffer beyond anything seen in generations
    McCain just like Bush " doesn't understand the economy".
    That not just my opinion its his own words. Not only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand how its been broken.
    It is no surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities use quantum mathematical models very few people understand.
    Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.
    Bush's economic advisor Phil Graham wrote the deregulation bill that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.
    Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury.
    No one in this country can afford for that to happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He was the last to know somthing was wrong. Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime. Check out this link to the truth http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
    It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be
    even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a budget surplus like Bush did but a crashing economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit. Most of it Bush created and it will take decades to pay it back.
    If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.
    When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.
    So why are the polls even close then ?
    Mccains team just said they no longer want to talk about the economy.Instead they would like to spend time talking about obama
    which means running the biggest smear campaign in history.
    They think they can just tell you lies and you wont be smart enough to see through it
    Let's teach him we are smarter than that
    Stand up and hold them accountable
    Bush isn't on the ballot this year but his policies are
    Elect Obama Biden 2008






    Check out this video of sarah palins interview and ask your self if she understands what she is talking about.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/26/2008 6:41:00 PM

    THE GREAT BUSH DEPRESSION
    I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.
    He perfectly predicted the current meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen next
    is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.
    The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide ,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch , Fanny and Freddy Mae ,AIG
    The government took them over because they are bankrupt. Even with the goverment nationalizing hundreds of billions of dollars in debt the stock market is crashing
    the credit markets are frozen and all of us may suffer beyond anything seen in generations
    McCain just like Bush " doesn't understand the economy".
    That not just my opinion its his own words. Not only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand how its been broken.
    It is no surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities use quantum mathematical models very few people understand.
    Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.
    Bush's economic advisor Phil Graham wrote the deregulation bill that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.
    Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury.
    No one in this country can afford for that to happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He was the last to know somthing was wrong. Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime. Check out this link to the truth http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
    It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be
    even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a budget surplus like Bush did but a crashing economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit. Most of it Bush created and it will take decades to pay it back.
    If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.
    When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.
    So why are the polls even close then ?
    Mccains team just said they no longer want to talk about the economy.Instead they would like to spend time talking about obama
    which means running the biggest smear campaign in history.
    They think they can just tell you lies and you wont be smart enough to see through it
    Let's teach him we are smarter than that
    Stand up and hold them accountable
    Bush isn't on the ballot this year but his policies are
    Elect Obama Biden 2008






    Check out this video of sarah palins interview and ask your self if she understands what she is talking about.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/26/2008 6:40:45 PM

    After 9/11, the US government started rounding up Muslims without cause and without due process of law, like we did to the Japanese Americans in WWII. The Bush administration called it's main internment camp Guantanamo Bay. While there are certainly many guilty terrorists held in Guantanamo, there are also many innocent American citizens who have been held illegally for years without even being charged with any crime. They have been tortured by our government. Some of them have died.

    Recently the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration in the matter of Guantanamo Bay. The Supreme Court Justices were NOT on the side of the terrorists. They were on the side of the Geneva Convention, that says you can not torture POWs, and on the side of US laws that state you can not imprison a person without charging them with a crime and bringing them to trial. I'm sure that like most Americans, the Justices who voted against the illegal, immoral doings at Guantanamo didn't feel sympathy for the terrorists. They felt sympathy for the laws of AMERICA, the land of the FREE, where even rat finks get a fair trial.

    Meanwhile, back in Iraq, the Bush administration is busy trying to build a smokescreen to hide the CRIMES they have committed. Those pesky weapons of mass destruction. Just think, the National Debt went up over 6 trillion dollars under Bush. More than 2 TRILLION of it went directly into the pockets of Halliburton, a corporation owned by the Cheney family. Halliburton is now a DUBAI corporation and therefore is not subject to US taxes. All that money they took out of the US Treasury is going into the coffers of a MUSLIM country.

    Did you hear about how the US government is being charged millions for Halliburton deliveries of sand into Iraq from Kuwait? Sand. Like there is a shortage of sand in Iraq? Another contractor shipped sand from Idaho to Iraq at our expense. Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz discusses these and other excesses of our current government's out of control spending in Iraq.

    Your grandchildren will be working like slaves to pay off this debt, so that the Bushes and Cheneys can live the high life in Dubai.

    Yeah, they're patriots, Bush&Co. They wear flag pins. And hide the money they stole from America in Dubai.

    And they want me to believe that Obama is a socialist. Right.

    In case you think McCain is any different than Bush, watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdJUCU1UH2w

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/26/2008 6:40:36 PM

    After 9/11, the US government started rounding up Muslims without cause and without due process of law, like we did to the Japanese Americans in WWII. The Bush administration called it's main internment camp Guantanamo Bay. While there are certainly many guilty terrorists held in Guantanamo, there are also many innocent American citizens who have been held illegally for years without even being charged with any crime. They have been tortured by our government. Some of them have died.

    Recently the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration in the matter of Guantanamo Bay. The Supreme Court Justices were NOT on the side of the terrorists. They were on the side of the Geneva Convention, that says you can not torture POWs, and on the side of US laws that state you can not imprison a person without charging them with a crime and bringing them to trial. I'm sure that like most Americans, the Justices who voted against the illegal, immoral doings at Guantanamo didn't feel sympathy for the terrorists. They felt sympathy for the laws of AMERICA, the land of the FREE, where even rat finks get a fair trial.

    Meanwhile, back in Iraq, the Bush administration is busy trying to build a smokescreen to hide the CRIMES they have committed. Those pesky weapons of mass destruction. Just think, the National Debt went up over 6 trillion dollars under Bush. More than 2 TRILLION of it went directly into the pockets of Halliburton, a corporation owned by the Cheney family. Halliburton is now a DUBAI corporation and therefore is not subject to US taxes. All that money they took out of the US Treasury is going into the coffers of a MUSLIM country.

    Did you hear about how the US government is being charged millions for Halliburton deliveries of sand into Iraq from Kuwait? Sand. Like there is a shortage of sand in Iraq? Another contractor shipped sand from Idaho to Iraq at our expense. Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz discusses these and other excesses of our current government's out of control spending in Iraq.

    Your grandchildren will be working like slaves to pay off this debt, so that the Bushes and Cheneys can live the high life in Dubai.

    Yeah, they're patriots, Bush&Co. They wear flag pins. And hide the money they stole from America in Dubai.

    And they want me to believe that Obama is a socialist. Right.

    In case you think McCain is any different than Bush, watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdJUCU1UH2w

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/26/2008 6:37:17 PM

    The Kennedy tax cut.

    http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1765.cfm

    About half way through the article.

    "President Kennedy proposed massive tax-rate reductions, which were passed by Congress and became law after he was assassinated. The 1964 tax cut reduced the top marginal personal income tax rate from 91 percent to 70 percent by 1965. The cut reduced lower-bracket rates as well. In the four years prior to the 1965 tax-rate cuts, federal government income tax revenue--adjusted for inflation--increased at an average annual rate of 2.1 percent, while total government income tax revenue (federal plus state and local) increased by 2.6 percent per year . In the four years following the tax cut, federal government income tax revenue increased by 8.6 percent annually and total government income tax revenue increased by 9.0 percent annually. Government income tax revenue not only increased in the years following the tax cut, it increased at a much faster rate.
    The Kennedy tax cut set the example that President Ronald Reagan would follow some 17 years later. By increasing incentives to work, produce, and invest, real GDP growth increased in the years following the tax cuts: More people worked, and the tax base expanded. Additionally, the expenditure side of the budget benefited as well because the unemployment rate was significantly reduced.
    Using the Congressional Budget Office's revenue forecasts (made with the full knowledge of the future tax cuts), revenues came in much higher than had been anticipated, even after the "cost""of the tax cut had been taken into account. Additionally, in 1965--one year following the tax cut--personal income tax revenue data exceeded expectations by the greatest amounts in the highest income classes.
    Testifying before Congress in 1977, Walter Heller, President Kenned''s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, summarized:
    What happened to the tax cut in 1965 is difficult to pin down, but insofar as we are able to isolate it, it did seem to have a tremendously stimulative effect, a multiplied effect on the economy. It was the major factor that led to our running a $3 billion surplus by the middle of 1965 before escalation in Vietnam struck us. It was a $12 billion tax cut, which would be about $33 or $34 billion in today's terms, and within one year the revenues into the Federal Treasury were already above what they had been before the tax cut.
    Did the tax cut pay for itself in increased revenues? I think the evidence is very strong that it did."

  • Posted By: MCGILL @ 10/26/2008 6:36:11 PM

    Let us hope that over the next week the kool aid drinkers come to their senses and realize that America is not a cult. The only actor that has been elected president was Ronald Regan and he was a true American.Obama is a Fraud and is not worthy of the office he seeks.Let us hope those who truly love this country vote for the country and those who have truly served the country McCain/Palin.

  • Posted By: ariziowa @ 10/26/2008 6:13:39 PM

    To Mr/ Ms ApprxAm - I am not quite sure what point you are trying to make. Please clarify. Thank you.

  • Posted By: TruthForward @ 10/26/2008 6:08:04 PM

    And what about McCain's Nazi and Latin death swad ties. Do a search, its well documented (its on foxnews.com also).
    the U.S. Council for World Freedom
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/07/mccain_and_the_us_council_for.html

    McCain has these ties. However, Obama has not exploited them because supposedly McCain has changed. That is integrity from Obama. McCain has no integrity.

    Yes We Can

  • Posted By: ApprxAm @ 10/26/2008 5:37:37 PM

    I'd like to know, program or not, McCain or Obama, when are we going to realize that taxes will have to be raised; period. The Repugz have screwed this country up so much, and I'm not just talking about Bush, Jr., but the Reaganites and there Chicago School Corporate Socialism. When CLinton gave away the store to Corpocracy, U.S.A., at least he balanced the budget. You repugz though it cute when Cheney brought us into an unfunded, unneccessary War and Gramm gave Carte Blanche to CitiGroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wall Street to treat the market like Las Vegas. So no matter Obama's philosophy, and I wished you asked that question 17-18 years ago, it can't be much worst than the current American paradigm. The United States has returned to Manorialism, not socialism as has been proported. The profits from tax payor pockets will benefit banks stock holders and not the people.

    • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/26/2008 6:00:40 PM

      See:

      The Laffer Curve: Past, Present, and Future:

      http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1765.cfm

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/26/2008 5:26:22 PM

    See Barney Franks comments on the news, including face the nation last week, stating that Democrats in Congress intend to greatly raise taxes and go on a spending spree.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1Mazjm_A5k

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGnSAlqjoU

    See http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/23617.html


    And again what was Frank saying at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. in 2005 to fix Fannie and Freddie.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

    "These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any kind of financial crisis, the more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."

    So which party is really the liar that soaked the American people?

    See also: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/08/politics/main2335631.shtml

  • Posted By: motorherz @ 10/26/2008 5:04:50 PM

    Yep, the more networking supportes the candidate has, the more evil he is. Wake up! Isn't it how Republicans were operating for quite a while?

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/26/2008 4:02:53 PM

    What do you really know about Obama's economic philosophy? Since he has never run a town, state or business, he has no record to look at. Oh, he has made lots of promises, but given that he broke his promise to be limited to public campaign funds, you cant put much faith in that, and there will be no means to keep those promises anyway.

    But you do know that Obama, along with his democratic buddies in Congress, personally and professionally advocated for a residential housing policy favoring forced sub-prime lending, which subsequently resulted in massive defaults and foreclosures, leading to your loss of significant equity value in your home, to the point that it destabilized your banks, which panicked the stock market, which wiped out your savings.

    Look and listen to Obama for yourself. Obama in this video, addressing his community activist work and his work representing ACORN in litigation against the banks and relating to the Community Reinvestment Act, and addressing the failure of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as those actions relate to the destruction of our economy by causing the current real estate and subsequent financial crisis, states that, and I quote:

    "Subprime lending started out as a good idea, helping Americans buy homes who previously could not afford to. Financial institutions created new financial instruments that could securitize these loans, slice them into finer and finer risk categories, and spread them out among investors and around the country, as well as around the world. In theory, this should have allowed mortgage lending to be less risky, and more diversified."

    Acknowledging the catastrophe, but as apologist for the Democrats, Obama then offers this justification.

    "The original idea was a good one, which was, lets see if we can distribute risk more broadly, and make it easier to provide loans to people who otherwise might not be able to get one."

    Yah, great idea. Economically unsound, but embraced by Obama. Listen for yourself. You cannot dispute the mans on words recorded live:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related

    Below is a link to C-SPAN video clips of the Congressional hearings at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix Fannie and Freddie. See for yourself who said what.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/26/2008 4:02:42 PM



    Obama's ill-conceived programs will require him to tax, and his health care plan alone is a substantial hidden tax on all business, large an small. In reality, it does not really matter who he taxes, those taxes are going to be passed through the economy. He has to tax, because it is they only way he can pay for his massive social engineering experiments. Any first year economics student knows that taxation is a tool used to contract an economy experiencing inflation, because it reduces demand by reducing the amount of money individuals and businesses have to spend. It is contractionary, which is exactly what you do not want to do when the problem is that the economy is contracting already into recession. Like Hoover and FDR, Obama's plans will only make it worse for longer.

    See e.g. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/03/opinion/main4499465.shtml
    And
    http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx

    How many full-time employees with benefits does a person with a $50,000 income personally employ? For most, none. How many does a person with $250,000 employ? One less under Obama???s tax plan, two less if you include Obama???s health plan.

  • Posted By: ajon1600 @ 10/26/2008 3:34:39 PM

    Sarah Palin makes Dan Quayle look like a Rhodes Scholar. I don't ever see America turning as far to the right as Sarah Palin seems to be. Let's face it, she lost the white women vote,, the white men, the independents, the hispanics, the over 50's, the African Americans, and a host of other Americans. The only votes she is probably still getting are the Rush Limbaugh devotees - and Obama was never going to get those anyway.

    Unless the Democrats have a complete collaspe in the next four years of the Obama Administraton, I don't think we will see a Republican run country again for an awful long time.

    Color and culture seems to mean less when it affects the pocket books and the kitchen tables. Notice how race has all but dissappeared during this campaign? There is a real reason for that... Louisiana is another prime example of how the country is changing and becoming less idealistic and more focused on issues.
    Who would have guessed several years ago that a southern icon state like Louisiana would elect a young man of Indian origin to be its gov?

    I Predict Hillary Clinton will finally get to design and implement her National Health Care Benefits program as her reward for supporting Obama... I also predict he will find a way to help her forgive some of the debt she has left over from her own campaign.

    Bill Clinton will be forgiven and embraced again by the Black Community - which is where he really wants to be.

    We are getting ready to witness the Democrats version of the Ronald Reagan political revolution and it's time.

    HURRY CHANGE IF YOU'RE COMING!!!

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/26/2008 1:43:55 PM

    There hasn't been a Democrat majority in Washington since 1965, and before that, 1933. It looks like we are about to see another such event take place. By November 5, 2008 both houses of Congress and the Presidency will be in Democratic hands.

    For those readers who can think for themselves, think back to 1965. Kennedy and the Civil Rights movement. A pivotal time in our history, one we can all be proud of. And 1933, when FDR gave us the New Deal and turned around the Great Depression. If you think about the past century, the only two times that we have had a liberal Democrat majority, America got STRONGER and BETTER.

    Obama '08

  • Posted By: sharenews @ 10/25/2008 8:18:11 PM

    neos, I would like to know what your response is to my post below cuz it is a fact (Posted By: sharenews @ 10/25/2008 7:50:43 PM)

    • Posted By: neos @ 10/25/2008 8:25:01 PM

      I wouldn't waste the time to read one of your posts. I used to and saw that they were consistently misleading, fabrications made all the more insidious because they always contained a small morsel of truth, a 'fact' that used used to bait the trap. You have proven yourself to be a liar.
      Love to talk but have to run. Need to go carve an upside 'M' on my face.

      • Posted By: sharenews @ 10/25/2008 8:33:36 PM


        Just like I thought. Typical ragging on me and never answering the question. Next?

        • Posted By: neos @ 10/25/2008 8:52:12 PM

          This victim complex you have is well deserved. You are the little boy who cried FOX, and now complain that you aren't taken seriously?? I have responded to a number of your fabrications and you continue to spin. Remember the military 'survey' you tried to pass off as a legitimate scientific poll? You saw that loriw, (OK, Not exactly a towering intellect, I'll admit) bought it com[pletely. Even after I took the effort to explain it to her she believed in St. Sharenews still. In fact she was spreading the lie herself on the blogs the very next day. Information is important. To deliberately misinform others for political gain is shameful. There are plenty of honest issues out there to honestly disagree about without resorting to fabrication.
          And what is it with you that you only run on a platform of hate? Never anything positive about McCain. Please don't tell me that you are one of those leftover pouting Ex-Hilliaryites....

          • Posted By: Nins @ 10/26/2008 1:39:59 PM

            Neos, you are correct. Sharenews is wrong for intentionally spreading misinformation. Lori does this also, and so does Nowforthetruth. They are following the GOP playbook. God, I hope that nasty poison doesn't get into their DNA! ;-}

          • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 10/25/2008 9:07:40 PM

            Neos, Sharenews is a bitter Hillary supporter. She cried and whined all through the primaries that Obama was stealing the nomination. It was embarassing.

            • Posted By: sharenews @ 10/25/2008 10:11:34 PM


              Pia, You are funny. Still using that old Hillary bitter thing with some of her supporters as an excuse as to why a lot of us wont vote for Obama? Time to move on . . Just face it. There will be people who will vote for McCain, like me, who just feel safer with McCain at the helm as POTUS. Period. Especially after that Joe Biden depiction of what is to come with Obama after 6 mos in the POTUS chair. Very scary. I can predict that SNL will definitely have a skit on that, and the whole Palin $150K wardrobe focus by the media which got more coverage than the Biden remark. Now THAT is plain scary. NoBama.

              McCain/Palin - 2008



              • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 10/26/2008 10:49:29 AM

                Sharenews, I have moved on..I have accepted the reality that Obama will be my president...you have not....you still live in your bitter, in denial and delusional state of mind. And you lie..daily..you smear..daily. It must suck to wake up and face yourself daily.

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 10/25/2008 8:50:38 PM

          Typical bitter and desperate sharenews because she continues to pick losers in this election. Can't pick a winner can you?

          • Posted By: sharenews @ 10/25/2008 10:15:41 PM


            I have been married to a wonderful husband for over 20 years . . . definitely picked a winner there!

            • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 10/26/2008 10:47:14 AM

              Sharenews, read my comments again....I posted that you continue to pick losers In This Election.

            • Posted By: dps1243 @ 10/26/2008 1:14:23 AM

              Not bad for someone thirty one years old. You must be from Alaska.

              • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 10/26/2008 10:46:09 AM

                So, you too remember sharenews posting she is thirty one. Good memory! For her to have been married for 22 years, she must have married when she was 9 years old.

              • Posted By: sharenews @ 10/26/2008 1:56:22 AM


                22 years to be exact Nov. 6th! ; - D

        • Posted By: kellyjean @ 10/25/2008 10:39:38 PM

          Good response!

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 10/25/2008 8:51:03 PM

        Second, neos!

  • Posted By: LisaB303 @ 10/26/2008 1:00:19 PM

    I am so tired of all the predictions. Mr. Fineman, you do not know, nor does anyone, how this is going to play out. I swear, some of you in the media lay in bed at night dreaming up new "worst case scenarios" that nobody else has thought of. Can't you at least let Obama win first? Must we start wringing our hands over future nonexistent problems?

  • Posted By: marieburns @ 10/26/2008 12:56:53 PM

    Howard is right. I'm an old leftie & would love to have the kind of responsible government Palin warns will take away all our freedoms & leave us prey to the rearing head of Putin, blah blah, but if Obama is as smart as we all think he is, he'll ignore us & govern from center-left, just as, say, Charlie Crist governs Florida from center-right. It's true that head-in-the-Foxhole viewers will never accept Obama or any progressive but the Democratic party can capture the allegiance of the better part of the country because the Republicans remain intent on pandering to delusional people & bigots. So, here's for a moderate, sensible agenda, even though I won't like all of it. RealityChex.com at http://www.realitychex.com

  • Posted By: givemeabr8 @ 10/26/2008 12:45:31 PM

    why not watch it and see. WIth all these "alledged" associations.. It' leaves me with questions. Some of it is true.. or Obama is "Murphy's son"--everything bad happens as could be..wrong place wrong time. .I am still undecided...I get so much from the Obama media..I figured I watch Fox and see if I get more info and then make my decidsions. Thanks for your info Cagirl2. Take care!

  • Posted By: CAgirl2 @ 10/26/2008 12:40:59 PM

    Hannity keeps pouring fuel on a fire of hatred and meanness. We need to come together, folks. Both candidates have said that they will "work across the aisle." Can Americans do that? Not from what I see here.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse