We Say We Want A Revolution

This is part of an organized effort to convince McCain supporters that he cannot win the election. Get out and vote - that is the only way to make sure that socialism doesn't come to America!

The bible is a cute story, nothing more. It has no place in politics or anywhere there are thinking rational people attempting to decide important issues, keep it in the nightstand where it belongs.

Thankfully, this will be a landslide. Itll be a nice trend to actually have someone who cares about the people of this country instead of making the top 1% just a little richer. Screw these Washington old-timers that think their rein will never end. McCain...your Mc-done!

"I give you points for censoring yourself for Newsweek." Well, unless the editor did it for you.

An enlarged Democratic party is a wolf in sheep's clothing for the "Progressive" Democrats. You think NY Dems act like Montana, or even Iowa Dems, for example? You self righteous "progressives" call these people DINOS. I don't argue that the Republican party didn't implode, but don't think that the majority of the people are "going for" Obama, they are punishing the Republicans. I give you points for censoring yourself for Newsweek.

REUTERS NEWS LATE SUNDAY POLL .....

OBAMA'S LEAD IS NOW LESS THAN 5% OVER MCCAIN ....THE OBAMA SHOW IS OVER !!

Yes, you might be right, But then again, maybe New York, California and other more liberal areas of the country may go big for Obama and the center will in the end, vote for McCain. Do not be suprised if Obama wins the popular vote by 5% but loses the electoral college. Its sorta like the eastern establishmemt thinking that the Yankees and Red Sox are the only teams in baseball, but then waking up to see that neither is in the World Series. This may actually happen in the election!

Where will you be on election night? Will Obama's thugs and the threat of riots affect your decision?
Posted by TOTA on Sunday, October 26, 2008 10:50:46 PM
Last week we were introduced to the fact that Obama's thugs are turning America into a banana republic - they are intent on silencing their critics.
A Florida TV station has been 'cut off' from the Obama campaign because a courageous news-reader read some tough questions to Biden, and didn't back down when he lied in response to every question. How dare she question The Overlord through one of his stooges? Where are her kneepads?
Do you see the outrage with which some criticisms of The Overlord are met? This is the mark of a totalitarian mindset. Think of how Bush has been abused for years, and has borne it with dignity. Not The Overlord. He's sacred - to think otherwise is naked racism.
Already, almost every criticism of The Overlord is met with the response, "racist", and he has yet to assume power over us. His thugs gleefully damage private property to silence critics (think about your car and your willingness to display a McCain/Palin bumper sticker. I would bet it depends a lot on where you live). Several hundred thousand Obama supporters are gathering for a 'victory' party in Chicago. If victory is not at hand, will they quietly go to bed? Not likely - the AP reports that police departments across the country are bracing for riots. Chicago is a hotbed of radicalism. Get ready for some grim times - even if they win, we may see riots. The Overlord is a thug, and he's awoken the rest of the thugs. 'Pretty words' may spill from his mouth, but some of the effluence of a sewer pipe smells sweet.

From this election forward, America will be held hostage by Obama's thugs in every election in which he plays a part. He may even be able to gin up his thugs enough to riot even when he's not involved. The Overlord is the most radical, dangerous, and divisive person ever to reach the national stage.
If Obama were anywhere near the center of the political spectrum, the election would have been over long ago. Instead, he shows every sign of being a marxist, so he repels tens of millions of tradition-minded Americans. He wants to turn the society inside out, so the reacion is visceral. But hate his ideas as we may, we still respect democracy. We're not going to be rioting on election night. We're going to be in our homes ready to protect our families, if necessary, from Obama's thugs.

Think about it: Obama's brownshirts are going to restrict the freedom of movement of millions of Americans on election day. Never before have they had to worry about where they are going to be that night. No longer. Welcome to Obama's America.

TOTA (www.tota.blogtownhall.com)

I sure hope they can bring down Chambliss in Georgia and of course will be voting toward making that happen. His campaign really was a low point in Rovian politics. I will also be voting against my House member, who's a medical doctor without any useful proposals on health care. Just more band-aids to protect profits of pharmaceuticals and insurance companies. (A good test on those, BTW, is to ask if anyone with a pre-existing condition or affordability problems in addition to access problems would be helped. No tax credit is going to do anything for you if you get rejected on pre-existing conditions). My Congressman also made a show of voting against the bailout, even with no real counterproposals of his own. Georgia is one of the worst states in the country on gerrymandered districts, which is why it has sent the likes of Cynthia McKinney, Bob Barr and Newt Gingrich to Congress. Districts are drawn to protect incumbents and you get people who are way over to the left or the right.

The Kennedy tax cut.

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/bg1765.cfm

About half way through the article.

"President Kennedy proposed massive tax-rate reductions, which were passed by Congress and became law after he was assassinated. The 1964 tax cut reduced the top marginal personal income tax rate from 91 percent to 70 percent by 1965. The cut reduced lower-bracket rates as well. In the four years prior to the 1965 tax-rate cuts, federal government income tax revenue--adjusted for inflation--increased at an average annual rate of 2.1 percent, while total government income tax revenue (federal plus state and local) increased by 2.6 percent per year . In the four years following the tax cut, federal government income tax revenue increased by 8.6 percent annually and total government income tax revenue increased by 9.0 percent annually. Government income tax revenue not only increased in the years following the tax cut, it increased at a much faster rate.
The Kennedy tax cut set the example that President Ronald Reagan would follow some 17 years later. By increasing incentives to work, produce, and invest, real GDP growth increased in the years following the tax cuts: More people worked, and the tax base expanded. Additionally, the expenditure side of the budget benefited as well because the unemployment rate was significantly reduced.
Using the Congressional Budget Office's revenue forecasts (made with the full knowledge of the future tax cuts), revenues came in much higher than had been anticipated, even after the "cost""of the tax cut had been taken into account. Additionally, in 1965--one year following the tax cut--personal income tax revenue data exceeded expectations by the greatest amounts in the highest income classes.
Testifying before Congress in 1977, Walter Heller, President Kenned''s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, summarized:
What happened to the tax cut in 1965 is difficult to pin down, but insofar as we are able to isolate it, it did seem to have a tremendously stimulative effect, a multiplied effect on the economy. It was the major factor that led to our running a $3 billion surplus by the middle of 1965 before escalation in Vietnam struck us. It was a $12 billion tax cut, which would be about $33 or $34 billion in today's terms, and within one year the revenues into the Federal Treasury were already above what they had been before the tax cut.
Did the tax cut pay for itself in increased revenues? I think the evidence is very strong that it did."

This is real simple economics. How many full-time employees with benefits does a person with a $50,000 income personally employ? For most, none. How many does a person with $250,000 employ? One less under Obama's tax plan, two less if you include Obam's health plan.

cm, you surely JEST, blacks REPRESENT CRACK!!!!!! Only in you dreams do blacks not equal crack.....it's an epedimic in YOUR HOODS....It's responsible for you black on black crime, it's responsible for the 11 and 12 year old babies showing up at abortion clinics across our nation....IGNORANCE is no excuse....McCain '08