SCIENCE

Why We Believe

Belief in the paranormal reflects normal brain activity carried to an extreme.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: GetGhostGear.com @ 11/05/2009 9:53:24 PM

    Nice work Sharon,

    When I started reading the article I thought it was going to be another believer, fluff piece. By the end I was happy to see an alternative perspective start to come through. In my research into the paranormal, I always take the stance that I don't believe in anything but possibility. I was in over 20 different states last year alone researching and investigating reports of paranormal phenomena. Two times last year I investigated reports of vampires (I take an objective but open minded approach to any reported mystery). Some of your visitors might enjoy reading all about my crazy real life supernatural adventures in my free Legend Trippers Journal (http://www.w-files.com/legendtrippersjournal.html).

    For those of you who are a bit more scientifically minded, I just released some level headed scientific method op eds on www.GetGhostGear.com with links right on the home page.

    Keep up the good work!
    Noah Voss

  • Posted By: believer88 @ 10/31/2008 2:30:16 PM

    The article talks about alien abduction as if it only happens when people are sleeping and therefore is all in one's head. People have been wide awake and had experiences w/aliens. Some people have scars to prove it, but the most compelling for me is when a person gets radiation poisoning when there is no other explanation for it. Also, there is a huge amount of solid, empirical, scientific data proving the existence of alien craft, if not the aliens themselves.

    Concerning ghosts, 2 yrs ago my brother died. His son called me early in the morning to tell me. Since none of the family lived near my brother, we did not have a funeral, and he was cremated a day or two later. His two children and I decided to go to Ohio at the end of the week to clean out his apartment and to have a memorial service. So the morning he died, I got up and decided to go to work. As I was getting ready for work, I happened to turn toward a wall and I saw my brother emerge from the wall. I only saw him from the waist up but I almost didn't recognize him because he looked different than I had ever seen him. His face looked different and his head was lowered, though he looked right at me. I was especially struck by the position of his head because my btother never stood that way. I was happy I saw him, but later and even to this day, it creeps me out to look at that wall. It wasn't until the weekend that I found out from his son, who had visited him fairly often, how the disease he had had affected his appearance. He showed me a picture that looked almost exactly like what I had seen the morning he died and told me that he had lost control of many of his muscles so that he could no longer hold his head up. He would stick out his chest and put his chin on it to hold his head up. This explained a lot about the vision I had. I could not have made up this vision because I hadn't seen my brother in several years and didn't know what he looked like just before he died. Besides the fact that the experience seemed very real, this evidence convinced me that I really did see him, which in turn, has been a source of great comfort to me.

    • Posted By: alandhay @ 11/17/2008 9:16:30 AM

      A source of comfort? In what way?

      You can't be 100% certain that you definately did not see any photographs of your brother, or were party to overhearing a whispered conversation, even subconsciously that would predispose you to interpreting wht you saw in the way that you did.

  • Posted By: Zeninnnnnnnn @ 11/11/2008 6:52:24 AM

    Very interesting indeed. I don't know why people decide to get all uppity about this. I mean it's not very groundbreaking. The mind is a powerful thing. I mean, if I'm in my room and the closet is open. If I were to have a dream about someone being in the closet and wake up, rather then check the closet, out of fear I go back to bed. I know there isn't anything in the closet, however I'm still frightened to check.

    This brought me back to when I was a child and had watched some sort of special about Alien abduction or some sort. When I went to bed last night I had fallen asleep with my hand pressing into my eyes. Which often blurs your vision for a moment when you wake up. And I woke up in the middle of the night and I could have sworn that there was an alien of some sort standing in front of my door. Needless to say, I turned towards the wall and promptly shut my eyes, hoping for either a quick death/ return to sleep.

    Obviously there was no alien/apparition and it was simply my hand pressing into my eyeballs for a moment, but because I had watched something on aliens, I believed I had seen one. My mind had made it real. And when I told my friends, I didn't care what they said. I had seen what I had seen. They didn't believe me, but they didn't have to, I knew the truth.

    I just remembered that and how I had figured that out a few years later, and I thought it was interesting to say the least. Mind of matter I suppose. Or in this case rational thought.

    Also, laughing at the people who have personal vendetta's against the writers/articles and believe that this is the worst thing to grace Newsweek ever. Just because someone has a different viewpoint doesn't mean it's right, and doesn't mean you have to listen.

  • Posted By: Zeninnnnnnnn @ 11/11/2008 6:50:55 AM

    Very interesting indeed. I don't know why people decide to get all uppity about this. I mean it's not very groundbreaking. The mind is a powerful thing. I mean, if I'm in my room and the closet is open. If I were to have a dream about someone being in the closet and wake up, rather then check the closet, out of fear I go back to bed. I know there isn't anything in the closet, however I'm still frightened to check.

    This brought me back to when I was a child and had watched some sort of special about Alien abduction or some sort. When I went to bed last night I had fallen asleep with my hand pressing into my eyes. Which often blurs your vision for a moment when you wake up. And I woke up in the middle of the night and I could have sworn that there was an alien of some sort standing in front of my door. Needless to say, I turned towards the wall and promptly shut my eyes, hoping for either a quick death/ return to sleep.

    Obviously there was no alien/apparition and it was simply my hand pressing into my eyeballs for a moment, but because I had watched something on aliens, I believed I had seen one. My mind had made it real. And when I told my friends, I didn't care what they said. I had seen what I had seen. They didn't believe me, but they didn't have to, I knew the truth.

    I just remembered that and how I had figured that out a few years later, and I thought it was interesting to say the least. Mind of matter I suppose. Or in this case rational thought.

    Also, laughing at the people who have personal vendetta's against the writers/articles and believe that this is the worst thing to grace Newsweek ever. Just because someone has a different viewpoint doesn't mean it's right, and doesn't mean you have to listen.

  • Posted By: S Betty @ 11/08/2008 9:10:50 PM

    Sharon Begley is grossly ignorant of the serious research being done on the paranormal, and Newsweek should be embarassed for unleashing her. She quoted Michael Shermer four times in her article, and Shermer, a materialist who reduces all reality to matter in motion, including events inside our brains, is the most notorious debunker of all things spiritual in the English-speaking world. Shermer is not a credible scientist with an open mind, but an illiberal idealogue who refuses to take at face value the claims of thousands of normal, healthy people tht point with force to a strange world that he is afraid to face. And Begley comes across as someone just like him. And so does Newsweek with its loyal but foolish declaration. Instead of reading Shermer, she should get acquainted with the ground-breaking research on reincarnation by Ian Stevenson, or the eye-opening (and eye-popping!) books on spirit attachment by psychiatrists like Louise Ireland-Frey, or the latest research on the near-death experience by dozens of physicians all over the world. As for ghosts and poltergeists, no psychical researcher is dumb enough to say they don't exist. The only question for them is what their nature is. Begley often does good work, but in this particular article she was out of her league. Worse than that, she left readers with the impression that if they were smart, they would be as narrow-minded as she iand Shermer are. That kind of mind set leads quickly to nihilism -- a cruel legacy for a writer to leave behind her.

  • Posted By: Jack R D @ 11/07/2008 11:14:03 AM

    Shortly after graduating from college, I agreed to house-sit a friends home and take care of her two dogs for the weekend. She was taking her two kids to Sea World for the weekend. Before leaving she gave me a tour of the house and instructions on feeding the dogs. One of her last instructions concerned the bedroom I was going to sleep in. She told me to leave the door open. When I asked why she told me "the ghost" does not like it closed. It makes him mad." Being a rational college graduate, I thought nothing more about this. He simply attributed it to her being superstitious.

    After eating dinner, feeding the dogs and watching TV I went to bad. I closed the door as much out of habit as anything else. Some where around 1 - 2 in the morning, I was awakened by a pounding on the bedroom door. I thought it must be my friend and that I had somehow locked the door. I called out to "wait a minute" and started to get up. Then I heard the sound of something crashing to the floor. I stepped out into the hallway and called out for my friend. No response. As I walked down the hallway I could see a plant that had been on a coffee table in the middle of the living room on the floor. I went through the family room and called in my friends husky. I was concerned I had a burgler in the house.

    While holding the husky's collar I checked the front door. It was locked. I looked outside for cars. Only the neighbors cars were around. All of the windows in the house were closed and locked.

    The husky and I then went back to the living room. I bent down to look at the plant on the floor. When I did, I saw my breath in front of me. The area around the coffee table was very cold. It was summer and my friend did not have air conditioning. I took the husky forward through the living room and towards the laundry room. The husky halted, started growling, appeared to be staring at something and the hair on its back was up.
    I did not see anything.

    I have no idea what I experienced. Sure my friend planted a thought in my head about the "ghost" but I did not believe in ghosts. My friend did not say anything about the pounding on the door, the plant being knocked off the table or anything about "cold spots". I was questioning my own imagination through this whole event, until the husky growled. I do not know why it growled. I never saw what it "saw". All I know is that something happened. Something I did not create. Something I did not imagine and the only living creatures in the house at the time were me and the husky.

    Go figure.

  • Posted By: Jack R D @ 11/07/2008 10:58:26 AM

    Shortly after graduating for college, I agreed to house sit a friends home and take care of her two dogs for a weekend.

  • Posted By: chieromancer@hotmail.com @ 11/05/2008 2:29:22 PM

    This article is deeply insulting to people who have had paranormal experiences, past live memories, or just simply have an open mind.

    The truth is, there is some much evidence to support things like reincarnation, only the most hardened of skeptics can dismiss it.

    Just because something can't be "proven" scientifically doesn't mean it's not real. It just means the science to prove it just doesn't exist yet.


  • Posted By: vmthomas @ 10/31/2008 2:00:45 PM

    Albert Einstein believed in God. 'Nuff said.

    • Posted By: crochater @ 10/31/2008 2:41:10 PM

      and yet mother theresa didnt in her last years......

      • Posted By: alandhay @ 11/03/2008 12:01:33 PM

        Actually she didn't believe in God throughout most of her adult life, as her letters published last year attest., although she did remain under the cycnical and cruel mind control of the vatican...

  • Posted By: oldefarte @ 10/31/2008 2:06:06 PM

    Thanks, Joercdd.

    Here's why I read this article: You see, I have a quandary. I'm at best agnostic and likely an atheist (having rejected "faith" as a basis for belief when I was in second grade). I've been an engineer, a military officer, a lawyer, and an intel officer, all jobs which require a degree of rationalism and a dedication to making decisions based on information, not intuition or belief. Indeed, so pronounced were those tendencies that, as an intel officer, my nickname (not self-chosen) was "Spock", for the hyper-rational character on "Star Trek".

    AND YET, I live in a haunted house. Oh, it's not just noises and stuff, it's full blown apparitions - visual, audible, tactile. The experience of these things have been shared (and validated) by numerous other persons (incl. those who had no cause to expect any such experiences and were not "predisposed" to run into a ghost by prior knowledge), by our pet dog (which once followed one of the ghosts across the living room, trying to sniff it, unsuccessfully), and even by our security system. These are not fleeting manifestations, either - not tricks of light or a brief "eerie sensation".

    SO, the question is, WHY THE H**L AM I EXPERIENCING THIS STUFF? My wife and I are so resistant to "supernatural" explanations that we actually endured these things for six months before we finally admitted (after one particularly compelling and shared experience) to each other that we'd been experiencing these things since we moved in.

    Unfortunately, the world seems divided into dedicated believers, who will, without even coming to the house, happily endorse my experiences based on their own belief system, and hard core skeptics who are willing, also without examining the evidence, to assert that none of this is happening. So I greatly appreciate your comments - all we can do is to fairly evaluate the evidence without preconceptions and hope to arrive at some explanation. At the moment, I have none, but, perhaps, someday, I will. Until then, all I can do is accept that I am experiencing things in which I do not, rationally and intellectually, believe and hope to reconcile the conflict that induces.

    • Posted By: alandhay @ 11/03/2008 11:57:52 AM

      Sounds like it would be a trivial matter to capture some of these events on camera? Stills or video? Why not invite a double-blind experiment to take place on your house to verify these events?

    • Posted By: Airnancy @ 10/31/2008 2:33:42 PM

      I too live in a haunted house. Sounds, things being moved, full body apparitions toys being played with. They've even set off our smoke detectors. Our dogs react to things we can't see. I am, however a Christian. To me, ghosts are contrary to the belief that you go heaven when you die. So we're in similar situations even though our beliefs are quite different.

      • Posted By: oldefarte @ 10/31/2008 3:04:02 PM

        My wife is a devout Christian and, for that reason, she rejected these "experiences" as fervently as I did, from my rationalist/atheist background (and, no, we try not to discuss religion at the dinner table). However, when we both experience the exact same phenomenon, albeit from different points/perspectives, it becomes hard to gainsay the experience. I don't know what our dog's "belief system" is, but when she, too, experiences and reacts to the same things we do (e.g., following and trying to sniff a "ghost" that we're watching walk across the living room), I have some cause to believe that it is not an idiosyncratic projection of an "internal perception" on my part. To believe that, I'd have to believe in canine ESP, which is an explanation harder to swallow than the possibility of "ghosts" (be they of whatever nature).

        I make no claims for the phenomenon save that I and others have experienced it in mutually reinforcing/validating manners. To me, that presents an intriguing possibility for exploration. Denying it is as asinine and unsustainable a response as accepting it without question. I live in the Pac. NW, and I don't believe in Sasquatch, but I would hope, if, during one of my forays into the woods, some big, hairy apeman came into my camp and ate the contents of my pack in front of me, I'd at least be moved to explore the issue a bit further.

        As to the gentleman above who asserts that the willingness to believe in ghosts is indicative of low I.Q., let me say that I'm quite willing to match my score against his. I believe in what I see, which is different than seeing what I believe.

        • Posted By: Mabullma @ 10/31/2008 3:40:18 PM

          I hate to bust your bubble but IQ tells one thing about a person: their academic achievement. This is only one part of a person. So in reality you could have a very high IQ and still be a complete idiot.

        • Posted By: Airnancy @ 10/31/2008 3:29:57 PM

          My son has also seen "scaries" in our house. He usually sees them right before an unexplainable event takes place. He's 4 1/2 now and hasn't mentioned seeing them in a while. Perhaps only his fresh mind and senses could. That sort of contradicts the idea that our older brains look to find patterns, see Jesus in a potato chip, complete the unseen lines in the trangle. Part of me would love to see what the "scaries" looked like. Another part of me is afraid to find out! We don't plan to move at this point, but that could change our minds. Maybe my daughter who is still too young to vocalize things will see her own version of "scaries." We'll have to wait to find out!

      • Posted By: Joercdd @ 10/31/2008 2:43:55 PM

        Ghost don't fit in a Christian worldview to my knowledge but spirits (demons) do so, as a Christian, strange phenomena like that doesn't necessarily contradict your worldview.

        • Posted By: Airnancy @ 10/31/2008 3:33:19 PM

          In that case, our "demon" appears to be a young girl. We've heard her laugh, cry and sing in our house. She also likes to play with toys. It truly makes no sense, because someone so young and innocent who has passed away shouldn't be lingering here on earth.

  • Posted By: janet_sh @ 10/31/2008 4:02:16 PM

    So for all of you that believe in ghost sightings, then why is it that you don't report seeing the spirits of simpler animals such as insects? Why is there this bias to see mostly humans?

    • Posted By: oldefarte @ 10/31/2008 4:32:16 PM

      Actually, for over a year, I had to try to convince my granddaughter that "Boppie" (i.e., her name for me) did NOT have a "monkey" in the house, because one of the apparitions is an apelike, gargoyle-looking thing. I had experienced it but never told anyone until the day she came into the living room, showing a welt on her arm and exclaiming that "the monkey pinched me". She also described it to a "t", despite the fact that she had no notion that any such thing existed. Her belief in "Boppie's monkey" was absolute, because, as a child of 3, she had no reason to disbelieve that Boppie had a monkey in the house. Another apparition (also seen by my granddaughter, tho', for obvious reasons, we never discuss any of these things with her) is a "black dog". So, no, no "human bias" or "inhuman bias" or however you want to characterize it. AND, at this point, I'm leaving the board because all I can offer is the assertion that I've seen what I've seen. I have no answers, no explanations, barely even conjectures. I won't convince those disinclined to believe and I won't dissuade those inclined to believe. This much I can say, tho' - to a frog, a table is invisible, because a frog's eyes and its brain's ocular functions are designed to detect movement. A stationary object like a table simply doesn't exist for the frog, except when the frog bumps into it. I'm willing to accept that, at some level, I'm just a frog and these things are my quasi-invisible table into which I'm occasionally bumping. One does wonder if frogs ever have philosophical discussions about tables...

      • Posted By: alandhay @ 11/03/2008 11:28:14 AM

        I'm not going to attempt to offer up possible explanations for the monkey / black dog anecdote as I would probably need to make some assumptions...

        However, I agree that the idea that we share the limited view on the universe analogous to the frogs perception of the table, and the concept of whether frogs might have philosophical discussions about tables did give me pause for thought, but only a short one...

        Although the table is invisible to the frog, its existence could be verified by frog scientists since there would easily be several empircal tests which could be established to test for the existence of a table, and these test would be repeatable and verifiable...

    • Posted By: ArcticWitness @ 10/31/2008 4:15:43 PM

      janet_sh you need t do your homework. There are many cases that involve apparitions of dogs, cats, even ghostly chickens.

      • Posted By: janet_sh @ 10/31/2008 4:22:49 PM

        If you read my question I explicitly state "mostly humans"

        It's interesting how people report seeing apparitions of an animal they are familiar with. Your experience with the world biases you to see apparations that you are most likely familiar with. For instance, take someone who has never heard of or seen a dog (including real life, pictures, and descriptions). Chances are that if they report seeing a ghost, it probably won't be a dog. Your mind is shaped by experiences that you encounter in your life and these may in turn bias you to see specific "ghosts" or objects.

        • Posted By: ArcticWitness @ 10/31/2008 6:38:58 PM

          Janet, you are wrong again.
          Let me fill you in here, as I have been studing, investigating and documenting paranormal experiences for over 15 years. If someone who had never seen a dog, ever, saw a ghostly apparition of one, of course they wouldn't describe a dog. 1) They would be terrified at seeing a creature of unknown species and substance, a four legged hairy monster would be your description. Not all apparitions are seen clearly. They may have witnessed two legs instead of four, ect. I don't have time today to explain all I know and the evidence I currently have of paranormal, that can't be easily explained away, such as apparition photographs with negitives. (NOT ORBS) Clear EVPS, answering questions that were asked by investigators. If you dig deeper you will find there is great evidence of things, no scientist or skeptic can explain away. I hold some of that evidence that had the guys at skeptic magazine stumped. (Soon to be published in book form) It just goes to show the difference between people like me and you. I actually try to find the answers, not just blurt them out from hearsay and what you've been told by wishie-washie writers, who want to make waves to make a buck.

          • Posted By: ArcticWitness @ 10/31/2008 6:42:41 PM

            Actually most cases, the person who witnesses the apparitions, cannot identify who they were seeing. The apparition is a "stranger" they have never seen before.

    • Posted By: thekidman @ 10/31/2008 4:05:23 PM

      No soul! obviously or else you would pick up EVP's of cats and dogs and not just people.

      • Posted By: Tamara317 @ 10/31/2008 4:39:22 PM

        actually, I have a pretty weird story. My mom has had weird things going on around her for awhile, so the paranormal investigators came over and brought all of there equipment. My mom has never owned an animal in her life (keep in mind when they do the investigation all TV's, Radios, etc. need to be off). The only sound in the entire place was people talking. On the EVP recording there were 3 instances of a kitten meowing. Most people didn't beleive it until they heard it. It was very weird.

      • Posted By: Tamara317 @ 10/31/2008 4:34:34 PM

        Actually, I have a very odd story. my moms house is haunted, Well I wouldn't say her house it seems o follow her. We had the paranormal investigators come over with all of their equipment and everything. My mom has never owned an animal in her life, th TV and radio were not on there was nothing but these people talking. There were 3 recorded kitten meows on the EVP recorder. Very weird

      • Posted By: janet_sh @ 10/31/2008 4:16:11 PM

        So there is evidence then that these simpler animals have no soul. I'd love to know where you came up with this one. Insects are also animals so I don't see why they would not have a soul seeing as how other animals apparently have souls.



        !

  • Posted By: Cheryl M @ 10/31/2008 4:28:13 PM

    How do you explain two individuals in the same room who see the same entity without any previous discussion or experience? My daughter was sleeping next to me one night as I dreamed of a man standing at the foot of the bed watching us sleep. She woke me up to tell me that there was a man standing at the foot of our bed. When I asked her what he looked like, she described the same man I had been dreaming about. My husband searched the entire house from top to bottom and found all of the doors and windows locked with no strangers lurking about. Another of my daughters shared a similar experience with her husband just last week when they both awoke to find a stranger watching them sleep in an upstairs apartment of a completely different house in another town. The shared vision disappeared when her husband leapt out of bed and attacked the apparition only to strike thin air. Would these shared experiences be classified as "mass hysteria"?

    • Posted By: alandhay @ 11/03/2008 11:17:38 AM

      The power of suggestion, especially when relating to dreams and recalled dreams is a powerful and convincing force indeed. How can you be 100% certain that your recollection is not tainted by the description your daughter gave - given that you cannot, by definition, rely on the fallibility of human senses and memory...

      In any case, even if you and your daughter DID see a man standing at the foot of your bed... my reaction to that is that either you were mistaken, or the phenomenon would remain unexplained. Unexplained, though, does NOT mean supernatural...

  • Posted By: crazyhorse888 @ 11/03/2008 2:43:41 AM

    Ms. Springen: I am instructed and informed by the report that the brain operates both with "reality" and "illusion" using the same structures. I have looked a many DSM IV diagnoses and observed that many DX are "merely" hypertrophic forms of ordinary activities or consciousnesses. Thanks... AP

  • Posted By: Sorenthia @ 11/01/2008 8:57:01 PM

    Bill Nye, the harmless children's edu-tainer known as "The Science Guy," managed to offend a select group of adults in Waco, Texas at a presentation, when he suggested that the moon does not emit light, but instead reflects the light of the sun.

    As even most elementary-school graduates know, the moon reflects the light of the sun but produces no light of its own.

    But don't tell that to the good people of Waco, who were "visibly angered by what some perceived as irreverence," according to the Waco Tribune.

    Nye was in town to participate in McLennan Community College's Distinguished Lecture Series. He gave two lectures on such unfunny and adult topics as global warming, Mars exploration, and energy consumption.

    But nothing got people as riled as when he brought up Genesis 1:16, which reads: "God made two great lights -- the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars."

    The lesser light, he pointed out, is not a light at all, but only a reflector.

    At this point, several people in the audience stormed out in fury. One woman yelled "We believe in God!" and left with three children, thus ensuring that people across America would read about the incident and conclude that Waco is as nutty as they'd always suspected.

    This story originally appeared in the Waco Tribune, but the newspaper has mysteriously pulled its story from the online version, presumably to avoid further embarassment.

  • Posted By: ObamaYesWeCan @ 11/01/2008 8:42:54 PM

    This moronic scumbag Samuel J. Wurzelbacher "Joe the Plumber" had his AZ driver license suspended

    http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/128323

    Wurzelbacher, who lived in Mesa in 2000 and had an Arizona driver's license, had his driver's license suspended by the Arizona Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Division on May 4, 2000, following a nonpayment of a court-imposed fine for civil traffic violations, according to court records.

    ...owes nearly $1,200 in back taxes, according to public records, still owes more than $700 to the Mesa court system.

    Records show he was cited for failure to stop at a red light and for failure to provide proof of insurance on Feb. 9, 2000, in a black Dodge truck at the intersection of Dobson and Baseline roads in Mesa.

    After failing to pay his original fine of $627.50 issued in March 2000, his license was suspended and the fine was handed over to a collection agency along with a 16 percent surcharge. The now-resident of Holland, Ohio, still owes $727.90 to the Mesa Municipal Court, according to court records.


    Hopefully the collection agency will break both of his legs so he'll never be able to walk nor work ever again. This typical Republican scumbag deserves it.

  • Posted By: Talla @ 11/01/2008 7:14:24 PM

    Sharon Begley writes, speaking of Randi, Shermer, the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, et al, "Too bad that as they fight the good fight for rationality, their most powerful opponent is nothing less than the human brain." Too bad Ms Begley apparently hasn't read either Dr. Elizabeth Mayer's book, Extraordinary Knowing, or the 2007, 800-page tome, Extended Mind, which reviews and assesses more than 120 years of scientific evidence supporting the rational belief "that the materialistic consensus which undergirds practically all of current mainstream psychology, neuroscience and philosophy of mind is fundamentally flawed." No, not all belief in the paranormal is based on brain activity activity carried to an extreme, but may also be grounded in an open, scientific mind.

  • Posted By: Talla @ 11/01/2008 7:14:03 PM

    Sharon Begley writes, speaking of Randi, Shermer, the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, et al, "Too bad that as they fight the good fight for rationality, their most powerful opponent is nothing less than the human brain." Too bad Ms Begley apparently hasn't read either Dr. Elizabeth Mayer's book, Extraordinary Knowing, or the 2007, 800-page tome, Extended Mind, which reviews and assesses more than 120 years of scientific evidence supporting the rational belief "that the materialistic consensus which undergirds practically all of current mainstream psychology, neuroscience and philosophy of mind is fundamentally flawed." No, not all belief in the paranormal is based on brain activity activity carried to an extreme, but may also be grounded in an open, scientific mind.

  • Posted By: shadrow @ 11/01/2008 4:01:35 PM

    Why is it that when ever someone is "believed" to be the reincarnation of a passed life that the poor reanimated spirit is always someone famous? Kinda makes me glad that in my passed life I was but a poor chamber pot / spit-tunecleaner. Ahhh... no were but UP baby... no were but UP!

  • Posted By: shadrow @ 11/01/2008 3:58:22 PM

    Why is it that when ever someone is "believed" to be the reincarnation of a passed life that the poor reanimated spirit is always someone famous? Kinda makes me glad that in my passed life I was but a poor chamber pot / spit-tunecleaner. Ahhh... no were but UP baby... no were but UP!

  • Posted By: lesothobob @ 11/01/2008 10:12:20 AM

    Hey, this article shows that we are wired to believe. So, I just happen to believe that God put that in us. We are hardwired to search for something to fill the void. Many choose to believe that which is not truth because it satisfies them. How much better to believe that which is ultimate truth and therefore ultimate life. I liked the part where research says this even evident at age two. Belief is a foundation of society.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse