Why We Need Wingtip Warriors

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Concerned Canadian @ 10/29/2008 12:41:23 AM

    Obama advisor wants talks with terrorists

    The revelations about Obama's relationship with Khalidi follows a recent WND article quoting Israeli security officials who expressed "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group.

    Malley, a principal Obama foreign policy adviser, has penned numerous opinion articles, many of them co-written with a former adviser to the late Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat, petitioning for dialogue with Hamas and blasting Israel for numerous policies he says harm the Palestinian cause.


    Malley also previously penned a well-circulated New York Review of Books piece largely blaming Israel for the collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations at Camp David in 2000 when Arafat turned down a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and eastern sections of Jerusalem and instead returned to the Middle East to launch an intifada, or terrorist campaign, against the Jewish state.

    Malley's contentions have been strongly refuted by key participants at Camp David, including President Bill Clinton, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and primary U.S. envoy to the Middle East Dennis Ross, all of whom squarely blamed Arafat's refusal to make peace for the talks' failure.

  • Posted By: TruthForward @ 10/28/2008 7:10:36 PM

    Has anyone noticed that Obama seems to be catching up in Arizona? And he is doing better than expected in Texas. McCain may loose his home state.

  • Posted By: almeidaroger @ 10/28/2008 2:00:20 PM

    What is exactly 'constitutional overtime' and what if that really happens? Would it be like the Bush's been elected without having the majority of the votes?

  • Posted By: georgeburns @ 10/26/2008 11:06:57 PM

    TruthForward... can you post the link to the FoxNews Article?

    • Posted By: sissyt @ 10/27/2008 3:45:23 PM

      so is fox news really a news company. I thought they were just hacks. pretending to be journalist.

      • Posted By: Jose52 @ 10/28/2008 12:24:35 PM

        Sissy, your allegiance to your lib faith has blinded you to the facts of Obama's lies. May you enjoy paying more taxes or getting your cut (if you are one of the special few with the dem password). The issue is not Fox news, but the MSM that never truly researched these types of many questions of Obama's character and the American public is happy with an illusion. When Iran destroys Israel and your Prez says we can't support our treaty with Israel; then maybe you will understand you elected a total zero. If you want my money, come get it. Buy Glock, Mossberg, and Smith&Wesson stock, it will rebound!

  • Posted By: haynessemperfi @ 10/27/2008 11:24:40 PM

    Comment: C-SPAN THIRD PARTY DEBATE

    http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/includes/templates/library/flash_popup.php?pID=281952-1&clipStart=&clipStop=

    C-SPAN THIRD PARTY VP DEBATED NOVEMBER 2

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/27/2008 8:43:51 AM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

    2001 Chicago Public Citizen Radio Interview criticizing the Warren Court as not radical enough for not pursuing redistribution of wealth.

    Says that community organizing is for the purpose of assembling the political power to force redistribution of wealth.

    • Posted By: Nins @ 10/27/2008 5:27:44 PM

      NowfortheTruth asserts that the goal of community organizing is to "redistribute wealth."

      The real goal of community organizing is to assemble political power for those who historically have had none: the poor and minorities. Some community organizations exist to redress the fact that white banks have refused to loan money to black clients. If you want to call this "redistribution of wealth," go right ahead. The rest us will continue to call it racism.

      And when it comes to discussing "redistribution of wealth" and calling Obama a socialist, it is time for you to rethink that strategy. You might be stepping into a huge pile of dog doo-doo, Now fortheTruth.

      Did you see McCain on Meet the Press this Sunday? Tom Brokaw played two clips of when McCain was against the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. McCain sings the praises of "redistribution of wealth" and says "wealthy people can afford more taxes."

      When McCain opposed the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, he said that he was taking a "principled stance." But when Obama opposes these same tax cuts, McCain labels Obama as a "socialist." Nice double standard, John.

      The doo-doo gets deeper, Now for the Dog Stuff on my Hoof.

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/27/2008 5:27:12 PM

    Obama has 63 Nobel Laureates working on his policy team. They are developing a plan to push America back to the top. Who is responsible for McCain's planning? Americans would be shocked to find that Douglas Holtz-Eakin is the sole person responsible for planning McCain's policy for America's future. Holtz-Eakin is also McCain's economic advisor, filling two full time positions on McCain's team. How can one single man (an economist) be responsible for developing a viable technology plan for our future? Obama has an enormous pool of the most intelligent, talented men and women in America working for him. Soon, they will be working for US.

    And let's not forget that the McCain campaign spent more on Palin's makeup artist than it did on it's foreign policy advisor. When you pay your makeup artist DOUBLE what you pay your foreign policy advisor, it is time to start examining your PRIORITIES.

    You look just fine without makeup, John. And Sarah is young enough not to need any. So cut the crap, and start paying some good ECONOMIC ADVISORS so you can have a fiscal plan to present to America. We're in the middle of a huge global financial meltdown, and you are worried about hair and makeup? PLEASE start worrying about the middle class, John. Please.

  • Posted By: sissyt @ 10/27/2008 3:42:18 PM

    enough withthe redistribution of whealth phrase, if you people aren't savvy enough to figur out what OBAMA meant then your just as screwed up ast the rest. YOur all parroting John McCain and sarah "carabou barbie" Palin. Who ever wins you think america would be praying about that instead of hashing old words. Good god already. if obama were white you would not be having this issue. He was talking about tax codes not giving your money away, probably many of you don't have anymoney anyway. so read a paper and shut up already

  • Posted By: jupmod @ 10/27/2008 7:36:03 AM

    "Guess what libs: sometimes your candidate really does lose - and honestly."

    And guess what? What I have stated was the truth! I was there listening to the news in 2000, and they have stated they had toss out thousands of votes! The whole cad problems back them made some officials decided to toss out votes due to a voting system that was so confusing that some people couldn't tell if they had voted right or not.

    So go do your homework, since it was the truth regarding those votes. Gore could have won Florida.

  • Posted By: Northern Neighbor @ 10/27/2008 5:25:05 AM

    It is simply a disgrace that America should have come to this!

  • Posted By: edpeepers @ 10/27/2008 3:51:58 AM

    "18% of Americans trust lawyers completely"

    You're kidding me, right? I may have to change my views on gun control if there are THAT many insane people running around...

  • Posted By: freedomsandwich @ 10/27/2008 2:49:19 AM

    Leave it to a Republican to take the opportunity to throw some low blows at liberals when all that's really called for is a good lawyer joke.

  • Posted By: AlwaysInTheRight @ 10/27/2008 2:19:02 AM

    I love it: don't forget, even in the primaries, the Dems were threatening to sue each other. And let's not forget who asked the Supreme Court to adjudicate the last presidential contest: the Dems.

    Oh, and about all the votes being counted: sour grapes. Plenty of investigations, and not one resulted in any claim that Gore would have won.

    Guess what libs: sometimes your candidate really does lose - and honestly.

  • Posted By: georgeburns @ 10/26/2008 11:07:31 PM

    Hey Turth Forward.... can you post a link to your Foxnews article?

  • Posted By: jupmod @ 10/26/2008 7:49:53 PM

    Really? Does this mean that McCain might suddenly start sueing states that voted for Obama? Claiming voter fraud, etc.? I hope not. I know the 2000 election was close, but having thousands of lawyers at hand seems to be silly. I just want a clean and fair voting for all. I do not want to see votes casted out like what had happened in Florida 2000. Many said that if all votes were counted, Gore would have won 2000, but since they toss out many thousands of votes, Bush won easily and it was due to the Repub who was on his side anyway!

  • Posted By: TruthForward @ 10/26/2008 6:07:40 PM

    And what about McCain's Nazi and Latin death swad ties. Do a search, its well documented (its on foxnews.com also).
    the U.S. Council for World Freedom
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/07/mccain_and_the_us_council_for.html

    McCain has these ties. However, Obama has not exploited them because supposedly McCain has changed. That is integrity from Obama. McCain has no integrity.

    Yes We Can

  • Posted By: GregHere @ 10/25/2008 9:05:18 PM

    ..................................Bush won in year 2000 with Lawyers helping him to keep the numbers of Democratic Voters down and it worked for him then..............So watch McCain use the Lawyers to throw out votes that do not figure to be for him in Nov. 2008 in hopes that he can throw the election his way. McCain has exited the "Straight Talking Express" many weeks ago, why should he give us the facts and play by the rules????

  • Posted By: Nowforthetruth @ 10/25/2008 8:54:22 PM

    "Ohio officials are investigating whether government computer systems were illegally accessed to acquire personal information about "Joe the Plumber," The Columbus Dispatch reports.

    Public records requested by The Dispatch reveal information on Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher's driver's license or his sport-utility vehicle was pulled from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles database.

    Information on Wurzelbacher was obtained on Oct. 17 through an account used by the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency in Cleveland, The Dispatch reported records as showing.
    Access to such information from BMV computers is restricted to legitimate law enforcement and government business.

    The Dispatch reported that information on Wurzelbacher was accessed by accounts assigned to the office of Ohio Attorney General Nancy H. Rogers, the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency and the Toledo Police Department."

    http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/10/24/joe.html?sid=101

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse