Jesus and Witches

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/29/2008 12:26:04 PM

    The Book of Revelations has been around for almost 2,000 years. During these 2000 years, the end of the world has been predicted based on Revelations at least 10,000 times. Every single believer who ever said that believed it to be true with all their heart. However, it never was true.

    I read the Bible frequently, and I find Revelations fascinating. But the popular notion of it is no more than a mental technicolor video game that people play in their heads. Good exercise for the imagination, but not very pertinent to the meaning of the text.

    Possibly (just possibly, because all interpretations of the Bible are just interpretations), Revelations is a metaphor for how each individual should "clean house" in their soul and purify themselves enough so that they can see God's presence here on earth. The "end of the world" might just be a metaphor for the end of the worldly ego.

    The reason that Revelations comes at the end of the New Testamtent is because churches have argued over whether or not it even belongs in the bible at all. It was written 100 years after Christ died. Martin Luther considered Revelations to be "neither apostolic nor prophetic" and said that "Christ is neither taught nor known in it." No-one is even sure who wrote Revelations, there are three known possible authors, all going by the name of John, none of whom is the apostle John..

    For Christians who actually read the Bible, it is clear that the Word of the Lord is what matters. Christ is not quoted in Revelations. Any Christian who uses Revelations to cast aspersions on people who have different religious beliefs is clearly not hearing the teachings of Jesus.

    • Posted By: paproudmom @ 10/29/2008 2:55:26 PM

      Curious, I never see Jesus in your posts.

    • Posted By: Naples823 @ 10/29/2008 12:36:10 PM

      Excellent post Nins. It's refreshing to hear from someone who has actually taken the time to study & theorize this book that so many just take as matter of fact. It is points like yours that hopefully will open some of these closed minds.

      • Posted By: LDJ Alabama @ 10/29/2008 1:22:18 PM

        Naples823, Nins comments are straight from BO headquarters. Great talking points huh? Wright from the script! LOL!

  • Posted By: Nins @ 10/29/2008 12:26:18 PM

    Even committed Republicans who support McCain are asking themselves if they really would take the risk of putting our country into Sarah Palin's hands. Many prominent Republicans, including Colin Powell, have said that Palin is not prepared to be Vice President. Being VP requires a depth of knowledge on national and international issues. Palin is ignorant of these matters. Being President requires great intelligence and a clear-eyed world view, one untainted by religious fanaticism. Look at the mess we got with the under-qualified Dubya, and even he seems smarter and less fanatical than Palin. McCain is 72 years old, with high cholesterol and high blood pressure; his father and grandfather each died of heart attacks at age 72. McCain's Vice President HAS to be ready to lead. And by lead, I am not referring to a full speed charge into Armageddon.

    For those of you who don't know, Palin belongs to a fundamentalist church that believes the end of the world is near: that war, financial distress and famine will kill off the sinful non-believers, and that when this holocaust occurs all good Christians will be taking refuge in Alaska. Furthermore, her church conducts witch hunts -- they actually use prayer to locate "witches" in their community, then publicly brand them as witches, and hold them responsible for everything that goes wrong in town. (Honestly, I think the long winters must be getting to their minds.) You can go on YouTube and watch videos of Palin participating during sermons like this. She stands on the altar facing the members. The congregation stands with outstretched hands, trancelike, speaking in tounges while the priest prays to "keep Sarah safe from all forms of witchcraft."

    Could you REALLY feel comfortable knowing that a woman who holds these beliefs would have the power to declare war and deploy nuclear missiles?

    • Posted By: paproudmom @ 10/29/2008 12:38:10 PM

      I don't know of any committed republicans who feel the way your describe. I do know a committed democrat who will not be voting for Obama.

      • Posted By: elithian @ 10/29/2008 12:58:14 PM

        Apparently you don't get around much. there are many committed Republicans who don''t think Palin was a wise or good choice. As for you being a committed Democrat; well, you are not! Otherwise you would support the team that will bring our ideals into reality.

        • Posted By: paproudmom @ 10/29/2008 2:54:07 PM

          You obviously can't read I said I do know not I am a democrat.

  • Posted By: wcwjarhead @ 10/29/2008 12:33:15 PM

    First I think Lisa and Andrew should invest in a dictionary and look up the meaning of the work rebuke. It means to express strong disaprovall. So the rest of your article is mostly a fiction by liberal writers who don't know what they are talking about. The editor should have recognized this blatant failure in the English language and rebuked these writers- probably out of a job. Go bak to English 101 and begin again.

    • Posted By: elithian @ 10/29/2008 12:53:55 PM

      Please learn how to spell back

      • Posted By: Millions of Reasons 2 @ 10/29/2008 2:52:55 PM

        Elithian- Dude, that's pretty funny!

      • Posted By: JJMizzou @ 10/29/2008 1:38:04 PM

        When you're argument shifts to spelling, it just shows you don't have much of an argument. I know the truth is tough elithean, but when your paycheck is getting taxed out the wazoo if Obama is elected, you will except it. Especially when you find out you're money went to the drug dealer next door in a check from the government. Isn't socialism great!

  • Posted By: dedeursu @ 10/29/2008 2:51:18 PM

    from your article: The man behind her is praying loudly, relentlessly and with an intensity rarely seen in America's mainstream churches.

    my comment: Guess you haven't been to many mainline churches lately. Which ones do you consider mainline?

  • Posted By: dedeursu @ 10/29/2008 2:49:55 PM

    quote from your article: The man behind her is praying loudly, relentlessly and with an intensity rarely seen in America's mainstream churches.

    Guess you haven't been to many of America's mainline churches lately. Which ones do you consider "mainline"?
    which ones you refer to as "mainline"?

  • Posted By: Millions of Reasons 2 @ 10/29/2008 12:26:44 PM

    Truth: let's take a look at a real record of poor judgement. Obama is not just affiliated with pastors who fervently pray for protection, he associates himself with radicals who proclaim the most vitriolic hatefulness.
    For a more objective look at Obama's inability to make good decision, or any decision at all, please take the time to see OBAMA's VOTING RECORD on HIS OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT WEBPAGE: http://obama.senate.gov/votes/

    What will you find?
    * Approximately 28 Instances of him gibing a NEA vote
    * Approximately 47 Instances of him giving a YEA vote
    * Approximately 140 [One Hundred Forty] Instances of him NOT VOTING

    We can all agree that is a more important measure of judgment, or lack thereof.

    • Posted By: elithian @ 10/29/2008 12:36:03 PM

      So, why haven't you posted McCain's voting record? Are you afraid of what you will find? How about his personal record of adultry and divorce of an honest wife? was it for the money?, the sex, both? How about his association with the bad deals in the eighties. His flip flopping on the issues to get nominated? His sell out to big business and his protection of the wealthy at the expense of the middle class

      • Posted By: Millions of Reasons 2 @ 10/29/2008 1:00:04 PM

        Enjoy: http://mccain.senate.gov/public/

        • Posted By: elithian @ 10/29/2008 1:33:37 PM

          I guess you do not want to repeat the errors of judgement so you send me to the source. Very good propaganda; the average reader is far to lazy for their own research so you feed them what you want them to know and leave out the rest but say, "It's there for you to read" knowing they won't.

          Well I did.

          McCain has been on so many sides of so many issues it is hard to keep track, What is worse than that, he abandoned his core beliefs and the issues he championed to get nominated. He remains a sell out. What can we truly expect of him as he is now obligated to be someone he is not. he would have been better served top have lost with integrity.

          • Posted By: Millions of Reasons 2 @ 10/29/2008 2:48:11 PM

            Elithian, you are having an interesting dialectical debate with yourself, full of diabolical conspiracies and agendas. Simply stated, you seem intelligent enough to do your own research, I do not count on laziness or misinformation; that is why I included the source URL, detailing Obama's overwhelming reluctance to make a decision or put his name stamp on a position. Interestingly, when he does make decisions he often times must rescind them because he usually is trying to appease what he thinks the masses want him to say, until they say he is wrong (but though this is factual, I will try to stay away from further conjecture, considering I do not have time to give all sources here). I will say, You have quite convincingly argued that McCain regularly has shown up and has taken a stance by doing that precious thing he was sent to the Senate to do...VOTE, LEAD, and TRY TO DO THE RIGHT THING WHEN A DECISION IS REQUIRED; you're right. You see, it's about leading.
            Without researching the entirety of the bills and all facts presented therein, I cannot speak to abandonment of core values; decisions & strategies adjust when facts change, yet speaking to a compromise on core values requires a full understanding of his core values and how each bill relates to them. Yet, as you have explained, he did take a stance on the issues,...leadership requires making tough decisions.
            I give some credit to Obama though, he at least decides to show up to say he's there --- "PRESENT"

  • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/29/2008 2:48:01 PM

    Mad Dog Palin: The scariest thing about John McCain's running mate isn't how unqualified she is - it's what her candidacy says about America

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/23318320/mad_dog_palin

  • Posted By: Freemasion33 @ 10/29/2008 1:30:30 PM

    all you guys that are blaming the liberal media should do some research, last i checked cbs, nbc, msnbc, and fox are all majority owned and supported by the republican party. This is also true of pretty much every mainstream media news paper and magazine out there. Its amazing the amount of ignorance displayed here. This entire election all these news outlets have done nothing but bash obama, who I might add is not even Muslim. He did not attend rev. wrights church at all, was 4yrs old when his family knew him as an acquaintance, and who obviously doesn???t hate America. Unlike palin who has been documented saying more hateful things about America then obama has, which he hasn???t said any. This has nothing to do with race, and everything to do with personal character, qualifications, and political views. Religion should have no part in government, and should be entirely personal. Every body should keep their beliefs to themselves, learn to have an open mind, and stop judging people based on things you have no idea about. Obama and biden have done nothing but address, issues and go over plans of action that will boost the economy, and help the average person like me and you. McCain palin, well they have done nothing but avoid answering questions, state falsities that attack character, and make hasty decisions based on outside interests.

    • Posted By: 4astrongamerica @ 10/29/2008 2:48:00 PM

      You need to get your facts straight. It is no accident that the media has been so biased against Republicans during this election. For people like you to mislead people to defend it is pathetic. The facts are that NBC has an controlling interest (82%) in MSNBC. NBC is owned by parent company GE, whose CEO is Jeffrey Immelt who, although once considerated a moderate Republican, has in recent years come to be widely regarded as a "liberal darling." CBS & their parent company Viacom's chairman and chief executive, Sumner Redstone, is a self-described "liberal Democrat" and a prolific donor to Democratic campaigns. Of the company's 13 board members, eight contribute primarily to Democratic candidates and party committees. Two other members of the board, Joseph Califano and William Cohen, held cabinet posts under Democratic presidents.

      Does this sound like a Republican based media outlets to anyone?

    • Posted By: Louisianaconserv @ 10/29/2008 2:36:38 PM

      You mention qualifications. What qualifications does Obama have that impress you? What has he done in his political career that you like? When I read the bills he has voted for and against and the many many even didn't even vote, I only see raising taxes, voting against medical aid for babies who survive abortion, and against financial support for our troops already in a war zone. What do you like about his record?

    • Posted By: Louisianaconserv @ 10/29/2008 2:33:30 PM

      Who said he did not attend Rev Wrights church? Obama didn't even say that. He admits to attending church there.

  • Posted By: 40YearR @ 10/29/2008 2:46:01 PM

    Certitude and fervor that a faith is the correct one gave us the Inquisition, as only one example. Religious 'faith' gave us witch hunts in America.

    Then the Founding Fathers banned religion from government.

  • Posted By: LDJ Alabama @ 10/29/2008 1:36:51 PM

    This gal lies more than a Chicago, ILL Politician! There's no shame to your game is there Nins?

    Posted By: Nins @ 10/29/2008 11:49:37 AM
    Comment: Actually, Alabama, I am a conservative Christian Republican. I am sickened by how far Bush and Rove have gone from the true ideals of the Grand Old Party. And face it, Obama is a far better candidate than McCain. If Romney had gotten the nomination, or even Huckabee, I would still be voting Republican.
    _______________

    My response: YEAH RIGHT! Wink, wink!

    • Posted By: paproudmom @ 10/29/2008 2:44:42 PM

      Agreed and there are more like her. They usually call everybody else liars. Don't be deceived.

  • Posted By: wordsmith @ 10/29/2008 2:44:21 PM

    [[Posted By: mab22 @ 10/29/2008 7:47:59 AM:
    Comment: "Have you never been to a church? DO YOUR RESEARCH IDIOT!!! ... What a moron you are to write this article without having attended a church service prior to slamming Palin ???There are many issues this election that need coverage ??? this is what we get from the media! Imbeciles!"]
    Your say the journalist is guilty of making unfounded judgments without being informed on the subject. You go on to castigate that journalist for the article without sufficient knowledge of the religion and its practices. You then proceed to lump all Christian religions into one neat little package as understood by you in the gospel of mab22.
    I am reminded of a ubiquitous catch phrase turned sales gimmick, WWJD. My question, however, goes a little further and asks you to dig a little deeper ??? not into your pockets as every organized church would do, but into your spirit and your soul. And I ask you, WWJT? What would Jesus THINK of someone who preaches kindness and sensitivity to one while viciously attacking another? Did He not tell us, "Turn the other cheek?" Did He not try to teach His followers to turn away from insult and offense and offer, instead of anger and retribution, compassion and understanding and love? Christianity is not just a banner for the self-righteous to drape themselves in. It is not a platform by which to elevate one's self higher than his fellow man. Neither is it a yardstick by which to measure others to be certain they are 'good enough' to be in our company.
    Christianity is a guide book with which we test ourselves and attempt to shape ourselves into something as close to the model as we possibly can. It is the set of rules through which we are given to judge ourselves, not others.
    Through the ages, men have been manipulating the words of the Bible to conform to their own politically motivated needs. Hence the multiplicity of versions of the Bible. And, not to offend anyone but, Wesley, Calvin, Luther, etc. all had disagreements with their established church and broke away, starting their own religions! Even the king of England had a falling out with his church and his pope when the pope refused to grant Henry VIII a divorce from his first wife. In order to retain control of the crown, the church eventually relented and granted an annulment. But, when Hal decided he wanted to dispose of another marriage and the church adamantly refused to back down a second time, he merely formed his own church and his own religion. One which, apparently, allowed murder as an acceptable form of dissolving a marriage.
    So where exactly among all of your hateful anger and name-calling, mab22, is the reflection of, not what Christians believe but, instead, what the Christ instructed us to believe and how the Christ taught us to behave? Organized religion has destroyed religion.
    A good man would not lie, but a less than good man would. So if he tells you of his faith in the Lord ... can

  • Posted By: Falalalala08 @ 10/29/2008 2:22:00 PM

    Talk about mocking God and others' personal beliefs, how about this article mocking Christians? Even if you're not a member of the Assembly of God beliefs? And how come we only hear about Palin's religious beliefs but nothing about Obama's? Atleast Palin's beliefs come from a source: the Bible, rather than Obama's which come from 'popular' 'feel-good' 'make everyone happy' christianity.

    I've never heard anything so biased in my life. Mainstream media--there you go.

    And if Obama doesn't win... well, since the media told us differently (which may be a lie)everyone will blame it on race since nobody would obviously vote for someone who has beliefs which go against the grain... right?

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/29/2008 2:31:00 PM

      You far right, Evangelical, puritanical folk sure do know your stuff. How can I join up to judge every one harshly - except me of course.

      • Posted By: paproudmom @ 10/29/2008 2:42:23 PM

        Seems you don't have to join. You are already there.

  • Posted By: wendydk @ 10/29/2008 2:39:06 PM

    Mad Dog Palin: The scariest thing about John McCain's running mate isn't how unqualified she is - it's what her candidacy says about America.

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/23318320/mad_dog_palin

  • Posted By: wordsmith @ 10/29/2008 2:33:56 PM

    [Posted By: mrsortafixit @ 10/29/2008 7:49:34 AM:
    Comment: It has always stuck me about the anti choise people....you never care about the baby after birth. Is it that you just want more to brainwash and to grow up to be sacrificed as soldiers in your crusades. The laws of our great nation are designed to give everyone the right to choose thier life path. I do not like abortion, but I do not have the right to tell a women what she can do or not do."]

    [Posted By: baybay @ 10/29/2008 7:53:33 AM:
    Comment: "NO, BECAUSE IT IS **NOT** A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHETHER OR NOT TO MURDER HER OWN CHILD. "ABORTION" & "PRO-CHOICE" ARE THE SAME THING! The Bible says "You shall not murder." PERIOD."]
    The laws of our great nation are a dichotomy. The government has continually struggled to do what's right while trying to appease everyone. There is a lesson to be learned from Abraham Lincoln's observation that "You can fool all of the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." You might extrapolate from that another dictum by which to live??? "You can't please everyone," ??? But that hasn't stopped congress from trying. We have laws that back up those laws from the mountain. Among those is one which states, essentially, "Thou shalt not kill." But then, in a twisted effort to please everyone congress equivocates on that law and thoughtfully adds a codicil which, in essence, says, "except in certain cases." You can't have it both ways???but that hasn't stopped them from trying.
    Obama, recognizes that you can make all the rules and laws you want to but people will still behave in a manner which seems to be in their own best interests most of the time, especially when you are dealing with young people or those with limited life experience. When questioned about his stand on abortion, he stated that he, personally, was opposed to it. But he was sworn to uphold the laws of the land, even those of which he did not approve, with which he did not agree. And those laws included Roe v. Wade. That is why he continually stresses the need for prevention rather than abortion. If you can avoid the pregnancy in the first place, you eliminate the desire and/or need for the abortion in the second place. Perhaps it's because I, and many others, have been supporting this approach for years that I see it as the logical and rational approach to the problem of unwanted pregnancies in this country. Or maybe it really is the best approach. ["Duh" moment warning:] Instill a higher sense of self in young men and women. Teach them to respect themselves and others ??? ALL others ??? Teach them the difference between love and lust and how to separate the two. And, yes, teach them how to avoid unwanted pregnancies through birth control. Reduce the number of teenagers getting pregnant and you will reduce the number of

  • Posted By: wordsmith @ 10/29/2008 2:32:21 PM

    [Posted By: BigDwane @ 10/29/2008 7:52:14 AM:
    Comment: "It's about time someone covered the spiritual warfare side. The apostle Paul speaks of the spiritual war waging by speaking of putting on the armor of God. If more folks recognized the danger, they would be do the same as Governor Palin."]
    Paul may not be the best to quote on this particular forum. He was a known misogynist and also preached that women were not only subservient to men but were, in all ways, inferior to men. So, BigDwane, if you have ever benefited from the hard work, intelligence, or skills of a woman, don't lean too heavily on the apostle Paul as your guiding source.


    [Posted By: Palin Supporters Do Not Know Their Own Bible @ 10/29/2008 7:51:02 AM:
    Comment: "Jeremiah indicates, it was usually the false prophets who identified their own government's activity with the will of God. It was the false prophets in 1 Kings 22 who said that their leaders were doing God's will in going to war. The true prophets like Amos were critical of political policies that supported the rich at the expense of the poor. ??? The author of Revelation was critical of an imperial power that had invaded the Middle East from the west and tortured and executed the founder of his movement. People who think that the USA has a special plan from God in its own invasion of the Middle East for the profit of the rich are rather selective in their use of their own Bible."]
    And during WWII, while the US splattered "In God We Trust on every bit of currency paying for the Allied version of the war, Axis military sported military regalia including belt buckles and other accoutrements with the legend "Gott mit us" or "God With Us". And, of course, during the Crusades, the Christians went into battle with the confidence that God was on their side, and proceeded to slaughter tens of thousands of innocent people whose greatest crime was that they called God "Allah".
    [Posted by: grams @ 10/29/2008 7:49:48 AM:
    Comment: "Wow..this is the first itme I've read a "blog" I am so surprised at how "hateful" everyone becomes. What happened to debate? Yes, express your views and respect the opposing views of others."
    Thanks, grams. I've been beating that drum for years! They don't seem to care, really. Some of these posters, under the protection of anonymity, release all of their personal, and totally unrelated, angst into these blogs. Their personal hatefulness which they are unable to vent in our so-called civilized society is released here attacking people they are confident they will never meet and to whom they will never have to defend their vitriolic rambles.

  • Posted By: lou7don @ 10/29/2008 2:32:11 PM

    Comment: I admire all your ethics, beliefs, Religion, and sprituality. I hope you can say the same for me. I respect and honour all beliefs and Religions. But very few lack the respect and positive view of my Sprituality and Religion. I practice Paganism (The Old Religion), as old as mankind itself. We believe in prayer and all Sacredness. All energy is positive or negative, it is what we make of it. So be it, I am a Pagan, I study Enochian Magic, and my religion is Wicca which in the old Anglo-Saxon word meaning Wise. My people do not recieve there Dogma from books or political influences. My people recieve our spirituality from our heart, love and all that exist, which is sacred. Such as the earth, the universe, all polarity such as day and night for such is nature, and most of all from The Supreme. I respect your beliefs and I honor them. and I pray that with an open mind you can respect, and honor mine. It was my pleasure and great honor to have written to all, no matter what judgement you may have upon me or my people. May the Supreme Bless you, and yours. Please do not act with Religious Dogma passed on by your beliefs towards mine. If you do I can only pray that one day we may all get along as one people without prejudice and hatred due to religion, politics, race, ethnicity, our sexual preference or anything that makes no difference between the color of our blood. May blessings befall all even during these troublesome times. I wish to add one more comment, I am not a zealot, just a man that believes that one day we can all become one race that can be benevolent and human.

  • Posted By: Seingalt @ 10/29/2008 11:24:49 AM

    This mass delusion called religion can be either innocuous (Presbyterians, Episcopalians, etc) or actively malicious (Islamism, Pentecostalism, fundamentalists of any stripe) but it all comes down to believing in imaginary friends. Most of us put that behind us when we were 4 or 5. To take direction of you life from an invisible friend is the very definition of insanity.

    • Posted By: elithian @ 10/29/2008 11:29:59 AM

      You are invisible so I choose to ignore you

      • Posted By: stephy0926 @ 10/29/2008 11:36:46 AM

        you can chose to ignore what ppl say but you cannot ignore the feeling, God is not an imaginary friend and It's that you have no thanks for the person who created you. I invite you to experience a life changing encounter with God where the holy spirit moves you and knocks you off your feet. God Bless You!

        • Posted By: Seingalt @ 10/29/2008 2:30:13 PM

          Person? Is God a person? Isn't this comment heresy and blasphemy by the accepted standards of the Christian church?

    • Posted By: communismisgreat @ 10/29/2008 11:42:55 AM

      I love these strawman arguments that atheists seem so fond of. Maybe some 4 or 5 year olds do, but most adult believers don't have an understanding of God as an "imaginary friend." Try again.

  • Posted By: 40YearR @ 10/29/2008 2:29:51 PM

    Certitude and fervor that a faith is the correct one gave us the Inquisition, as only one example. Religious 'faith' gave us witch hunts in America.

    Then the Founding Fathers banned religion from government.


  • Posted By: Alegria7 @ 10/29/2008 2:23:33 PM

    Wendydk and AzraelDarkAngel540, my response to the Author: I beg you to reconsider your account of "what is rarely seen in America churches today" - that is unless you rarely step into one. The scene you describe in Palin???s video is seen over and over again in my church and every Christian Spirit-filled Church across this nation. I am terribly disappointed with White's comment about how "The Assembly of God is more charismatic, very evangelical. Wasilla Bible is a very conservative church and therefore it's comfortable for politicians to be there and be part of it." Jesus was not always comfortable in his work for God to bring truth to this world on the Cross! And nor is the Holy Spirit so shy in changing a heart, and moving us to know God (view of a Christian). I highly doubt that Palin???s attendance of Wasilla Bible has anything to do with leaving because AG is too charismatic or evangelic. You would have questioned matters of her faith (providing your description of the video) if she had stayed at AG, just the same as you are now questioning her motive for attending WB. "Left-wing observers cite the clip as evidence that Palin is a right-wing Christian nut who believes in witches and exorcisms and, most probably, in crazy end-times scenarios. The right repeats its mantra about Palin's Bible-based values..." Author, whether you quote someone or not, I discern that clearly you have stated YOUR opinion on this matter in your text. I don???t know WHO took the poll on the percentage of Americans that believe in witches. EVERY TRUE Christian knows that witchcraft exists, as the Bible adresses it. Drugs, Divination, horoscopes, fortune telling, mediums, Ouija boards etc. is all witchcraft. It???s in our primetime TV shows/Blockbuster movies! I can hardly understand your reason for this "educated article" being you barely provide information about WHAT witchcraft is considered to be for the uneducated reader, instead of scaring them half to death with your uneducated debate. Christ, by the way MANY times in the Bible cast out demonic spirits from people. A strong belief in Christians and even those who are not- whom have observed the truth of ATLEAST good and evil forces in this world. Funny, that even non-Christians see Christ as at least a ???moral teacher???. I am less frightened by someone who confesses their faith, than someone (like Obama) who does not confess all his true beliefs. INEVITABLY, all wars are fought on matters of right/wrong -good vs. evil- and RELIGION. And our final wars WILL be about the latter, which of course is what the Bible tells us. Maybe you should look into Revelations, last book of the Bible. It is, of course the only book that predicted the Jews reclaiming Israel, having taken place in 1950???s ???Just one of the key ingredients in the Biblical recipe for Christ???s return. If you had any idea about what is going on in Israel, you would see how Revelations consistently line

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/29/2008 2:28:52 PM

      Absolutely. Witches and witch hunters rule. Excuse me I have to go brush my unicorn.

  • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/29/2008 2:26:57 PM

    Palin believes in witches and warlocks.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse