Jesus and Witches

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: cbt91 @ 10/29/2008 11:41:23 PM

    Was this considered real journalism? "Yeah, uh, let's not take her at her word and her own publlic comments, let's just build a straw man based on what we think she thinks and then poke fun at the wacky religulous people - some of whom actually believe what the Bible says!"

    What amazes me is that you got paid to write this irrelevant nonsense and "Newsweak" passes it off as some sort of hard-hitting expose. Why don;t you just admit you love and worship Obama so you can remove the pretense that you have any semblance of objectivity, OK?

    Or, should I look forward to a similar "expose" on Obama's faith background (Pfleger, Wright)? No? Didn't think so.

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 10/30/2008 9:42:29 AM

      Hey, don't blame Newsweek because your party picked a raving loon for VP.

  • Posted By: ecar @ 10/29/2008 4:17:41 PM

    Posted By: Louisianaconserv @ 10/29/2008 4:14:24 PM

    Comment: if she wears her religion on her sleeve, why are we just learning what her religion is?

    EXACTLY! She's got alot to hide

    • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/29/2008 4:24:52 PM

      The witch hunter performed a "religion cloaking ceremony" simultaneously with the witch-removal program.

      • Posted By: Louisianaconserv @ 10/29/2008 4:53:19 PM

        If that's the ridiculous way you want to look at it, then better her church rid me of witches if she is in office than Obama's church who will rid of us what is it? What does his church preach against... oh yeah, US, THIS COUNTRY. Still feel safer with Palin.

        No comment about why you like Obama, what is that he stands for that is appealing to you? Thought not.

        • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 10/30/2008 9:42:04 AM

          More crazed comments by crazed Reps. Crazy and desperate.

        • Posted By: elithian @ 10/29/2008 8:33:53 PM

          I will answer that. First, he is not Bush or Cheney. Second he is not Republican. Third he actually seems to care about people. I could go on but you do not want real answers. You are just feeling desparate because he is going to win and McCain is not. What I don't get is why anyone want McCain? He is certainly not all that special. He has been a screw up all along. Competence: bottom five of his class. Courage; shot don in two weeks. Marriage; adulterer who married a younger rich wife. Man of Priniciple: turned his back on all of his real life's work in the Senate to get nominated. Leader: read the former. I think I will look forward to the prosperity of the Obama Administration.

          • Posted By: Louisianaconserv @ 10/29/2008 8:45:57 PM

            So you like him because he is not Republican? Are you generalizing and saying that all republicans are bad? How "intolerant" of you.

    • Posted By: Louisianaconserv @ 10/29/2008 4:35:21 PM

      Apparently not nearly as much as Obama. At least no one at her church or she has dinners with, lives in the same neighborhood with, who babysits her kids is a known terrorist. And we all know they've been trying to find something bad in her past..... and for what? I thought you guys believe past associations and what church someone goes to is irrelevant.

      I can't argue with you guys anymore. There is fact, there is fiction and there is truth and lies. If you are not willing to look at these things, then no one can convince you. So whatever you are looking at to make your decisions must be fairies, unicorns, etc. cause I've seen NO facts to convince me that Obama cares AT ALL about the people of this country. If you take your responsibility as a voter in this country so lightly that you are willing to turn it over to someone with so many questionable people all around him, and no record of doing what's right for this economy, then God help us all. So many of you posting here are just angry at something, religion or something, i can't even figure it out, that you are refusing to listen to reason and will do anything to avoid voting republican just because of your anger. You are generalizing - not every republican is a christian, not every republican is rich. There are good people who are about this country on both sides - republican and democrats, but to piss our safety and freedoms away on someone with no proof of what he stands for, is grossly irresponsible. It is your prejudices that blind you, not any prejudices you claim the republicans or christians have made.

      • Posted By: AskPlus @ 10/29/2008 4:49:17 PM

        If you said what you said without bias, it may be in the neighborhood of almost 1/3 credible. But, you - like most of the extreme right - fail to raise the benefits of McCain and his campaign, and how you have "proof" that he does care. If lying, cheating, swift-boating and having no passable plans is caring - he should win. we're at the "steel kitchen sink session" of lies, and it seems that most around the world believe McCain is pretty awful, lost party support, and picked a wacko for VP.

  • Posted By: waynelaw78 @ 10/30/2008 9:32:00 AM

    AzraelDarkAngel - who decides what is "intrinsically good in itself" and helps "achieve harmony and balance?" What's the standard? If it's your standard, then all of us have our own standard that is equally valid.

  • Posted By: waynelaw78 @ 10/30/2008 9:29:23 AM

    I would be refreshing to see an article on religious beliefs written by someone who actually has some personal knowledge of the subject. the authors write that Palin's pastor delievered a sermon in which he referred to his congregation as " a chosen generation and a royal priesthood." Anyone with a smattering of familiarity with scripture, or the inclination to do a tiny amount of research would know that these words are not the pastor's, but are a quote from the Bible, written by the Apostle Peter, and apply to all Christians, not just Palin's congregation.

  • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 10/29/2008 11:54:55 AM

    It is unfortunate that this article was written with such a condescending and patronizing tone, because now people are reacting as if Christianity is on trial. It isn't, and it is unfortunate that folks feel the need to defend their belief in Christian doctrine because the journalists did such a poor and biased job of writing..

    What should have been the focus of this article is: will Sarah Palin's religious beliefs interfere with her ability to govern in an impartial way? I believed before I read the article that the answer was no, and I still believe it.

    I think that Obama, McCain, and Biden are all capable and willing to separate their religious beliefs from their decision making process and will be able to govern and lead in a fair and impartial way.

    I don't think Palin can keep her beliefs separate, and I further think she will actively promote an agenda that imposes her beliefs on others, and that is the line I draw - a person's religious beliefs are not supposed to infringe on my rights. I believe she would do that.

    I believe the other three candidates won't.

    • Posted By: revnaumann @ 10/30/2008 8:30:17 AM

      Help me understand how someone is not suppose to let some type of beleif system impact how they live. I'm surprised that you would think that the other politicuans would not let their beliefs guide the decisions they make. We all have beliefs whether they are based on the Bible or some other writings they are a belief. I myself for example have studied historical docunents from hundreds of years ago that fly in the face of guncontrol.

    • Posted By: bkpkr2@hotmail.com @ 10/29/2008 12:01:28 PM

      What makes you so sure that GOVERNOR Palin will not be able to separate her religious beliefs. What evidence do you have that makes it so easy for you to state that with such surety? Just curious. I've heard that quite a bit and I'm wondering why people so quickly state it as fact. Hmmm. She has been in politics awhile... let's prove that this is what she does/will do.

      • Posted By: paproudmom @ 10/29/2008 12:22:42 PM

        Because they are so judgemental of others who disagree with them. I have done research and nothing I have read would suggest that she opposed her personal beliefs on others. She does have the right to have them. This is something progressive don't believe although they will pretend they do.

        • Posted By: nimodahooligan @ 10/29/2008 1:43:49 PM

          sure shes not pushing her personal beliefs on others...but shes using her beliefs to make decisions for millions of people...that should not happen...it should be clear, concise, grounded thoughtout answers to our countries most pressing issues and questions...not reading scripture or speaking in toungues...if i wanted that i would move to iran...

      • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 10/29/2008 1:42:01 PM

        She believes that a woman does not have the right to make decisions about her own body, and her beliefs are based on her religion. And she is quite clear about advancing her agenda on abortion rights, as well as stem cell research and the morning after pill BASED STRICTLY ON HER RELIGIOUS BELIEFS!

        She also has talked about banning books and having creationism taught in schools.

        She can't separate her religious beliefs from her civic responsibilities, which are to uphold the laws and uphold the constitution.

        And if she is going to govern based on her religious beliefs, I don't want a woman who believes in the end of days in her lifetime to have access to nuclear weapons.

        Hope that answers your question.

  • Posted By: Juliajulia @ 10/29/2008 11:53:04 PM

    The only thing that really scares me about the Evangelicals is the ones that believe the end is near. I am afraid because they welcome it and may do all they can to cause it, or given the chance, will not do anything they can to stop a war they think will help bring the end of days.

    • Posted By: paproudmom @ 10/30/2008 8:27:58 AM

      I think you really are over reacting in fearing people who fear the end is near. Personally I do not have any idea when the end is coming. But I heard that you should live like it is because then you will act like a christian should. If that is the case then there is nothing to be afraid of. Image people wanting to act well and treat others with respect. What a great world.

  • Posted By: abey @ 10/30/2008 6:29:42 AM

    Community work for the upliftment of the poor & downtrodden falls within the intrest of Christ.- like what Obama did. Ditching a wonderful( GOD given ) wife for no reason or any reason does not fall within the intrest of Christ.- like what McCain did . . Ask Nelson Rockfeller , because he paid for it.
    So who is a better Christian ? & do not be a hypocrite ---- Christ really hates that.

    • Posted By: paproudmom @ 10/30/2008 8:21:29 AM

      I guess the destruction of innocent life would be not be Christ like. Many people who help with charities are with religiously based organizations. While you are right that some community organizations do good work, others like Acorn are not acting in a Christ like way. Encouraging people to feel they are owed everything is not Christ like. Anyone can cherry pick a few topics to make their points. Look at the whole picture and then decide. When doing so Christians may come up with different conclusions. Just make sure you are not comparing apples to oranges. Moral relativism is very common today but does not generally provide for well thought out positions.

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/30/2008 8:05:30 AM

    People on these bogs are fond of saying that the current economic meltdown was caused by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac underwriting bad mortgages. While Fannie and Freddie obviously are guilty of writing bad mortgages, and worse, guilty of lobbying Congress to allow them to do so with impunity, their actions are just a small piece of the puzzle when it comes to determining who (or what) caused the financial crisis we face today.

    In 1929 the stock market crash caused the banks to fail, because the banks were in bed with the stock market. Back then, banks owned investment houses, so when the stock market fell, the banks fell too. This triggered the Great Depression. So in 1933 the Congress wrote laws that regulated banking, making it illegal for banks to own investment companies, mortgage guaranty companies or insurance companies. The idea was to keep key industries separated by a fire wall, so that if one industry failed the whole economy would not go down in flames.

    But the Republicans under Bush deregulated the banking industry. Senator Phil Gramm wrote legislation (the Gramm Rudman Act, the Gramm Leach Biley Act, etc.) that stripped away the regulations in the financial and insurance industies. He pushed them through the Republican Congress and they were signed into law by Geo. W. Bush. John McCain voted in favor. Everybody said how great it is to deregulate and create free markets.

    Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch each gave over a million dollars to Senator Gramm's re-election campaign.

    The economic collapse that happened later was a direct result of the deregulation, and here's how: the banks wrote bad mortgages, then bundled the mortgages into investment vehicles that they sold all over the world, and they even got firms like AIG to insure the investments. It was all a house of cards.

    If there had been no deregulation, sure we would have had a bunch of bad mortgages, and the mortgage guaranty and real estate industries would have suffered, but there would not have been a global financial meltdown, since the problem would have been contained in one sector of the economy. You can thank Geo W. Bush, Sen. Phil Gramm and Sen John McCain for the meltdown, since they were strong proponents of deregulation.

    Furthermore, although Fannie and Freddie are now holding the bulk of these bad mortgages, Fannie and Freddie did not originally write most of these mortgages. They bought them after the fact, bundled by banks/investment companies. Fannie and Freddie got screwed by the Wall Street fat cats. And so did you, if you pay taxes.

    What is Phil Gramm doing today? He works as a lobbyist in Washington, trying to make it legal for the Swiss bank he represents to sell Death Bonds in the United States. Nice guy, Phil Gramm. Incidentally, John McCain has said that he wants to appoint Phil Gramm as Treasury Secretary. Some people just can't learn from their mistakes.

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/30/2008 8:05:21 AM

    People on these bogs are fond of saying that the current economic meltdown was caused by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac underwriting bad mortgages. While Fannie and Freddie obviously are guilty of writing bad mortgages, and worse, guilty of lobbying Congress to allow them to do so with impunity, their actions are just a small piece of the puzzle when it comes to determining who (or what) caused the financial crisis we face today.

    In 1929 the stock market crash caused the banks to fail, because the banks were in bed with the stock market. Back then, banks owned investment houses, so when the stock market fell, the banks fell too. This triggered the Great Depression. So in 1933 the Congress wrote laws that regulated banking, making it illegal for banks to own investment companies, mortgage guaranty companies or insurance companies. The idea was to keep key industries separated by a fire wall, so that if one industry failed the whole economy would not go down in flames.

    But the Republicans under Bush deregulated the banking industry. Senator Phil Gramm wrote legislation (the Gramm Rudman Act, the Gramm Leach Biley Act, etc.) that stripped away the regulations in the financial and insurance industies. He pushed them through the Republican Congress and they were signed into law by Geo. W. Bush. John McCain voted in favor. Everybody said how great it is to deregulate and create free markets.

    Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch each gave over a million dollars to Senator Gramm's re-election campaign.

    The economic collapse that happened later was a direct result of the deregulation, and here's how: the banks wrote bad mortgages, then bundled the mortgages into investment vehicles that they sold all over the world, and they even got firms like AIG to insure the investments. It was all a house of cards.

    If there had been no deregulation, sure we would have had a bunch of bad mortgages, and the mortgage guaranty and real estate industries would have suffered, but there would not have been a global financial meltdown, since the problem would have been contained in one sector of the economy. You can thank Geo W. Bush, Sen. Phil Gramm and Sen John McCain for the meltdown, since they were strong proponents of deregulation.

    Furthermore, although Fannie and Freddie are now holding the bulk of these bad mortgages, Fannie and Freddie did not originally write most of these mortgages. They bought them after the fact, bundled by banks/investment companies. Fannie and Freddie got screwed by the Wall Street fat cats. And so did you, if you pay taxes.

    What is Phil Gramm doing today? He works as a lobbyist in Washington, trying to make it legal for the Swiss bank he represents to sell Death Bonds in the United States. Nice guy, Phil Gramm. Incidentally, John McCain has said that he wants to appoint Phil Gramm as Treasury Secretary. Some people just can't learn from their mistakes.

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/30/2008 8:05:09 AM

    fter 9/11, the US government started rounding up Muslims without cause and without due process of law, like we did to the Japanese Americans in WWII. The Bush administration called it's main internment camp Guantanamo Bay. While there are certainly many guilty terrorists held in Guantanamo, there are also many innocent American citizens who have been held illegally for years without even being charged with any crime. They have been tortured by our government. Some of them have died.

    Recently the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration in the matter of Guantanamo Bay. The Supreme Court Justices were NOT on the side of the terrorists. They were on the side of the Geneva Convention, that says you can not torture POWs, and on the side of US laws that state you can not imprison a person without charging them with a crime and bringing them to trial. I'm sure that like most Americans, the Justices who voted against the illegal, immoral doings at Guantanamo didn't feel sympathy for the terrorists. They felt sympathy for the laws of AMERICA, the land of the FREE, where even rat finks get a fair trial.

    Meanwhile, back in Iraq, the Bush administration is busy trying to build a smokescreen to hide the CRIMES they have committed. Those pesky weapons of mass destruction. Just think, the National Debt went up over 6 trillion dollars under Bush. More than 2 TRILLION of it went directly into the pockets of Halliburton, a corporation owned by the Cheney family. Halliburton is now a DUBAI corporation and therefore is not subject to US taxes. All that money they took out of the US Treasury is going into the coffers of a MUSLIM country.

    Did you hear about how the US government is being charged millions for Halliburton deliveries of sand into Iraq from Kuwait? Sand. Like there is a shortage of sand in Iraq? Another contractor shipped sand from Idaho to Iraq at our expense. Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz discusses these and other excesses of our current government's out of control spending in Iraq.

    Your grandchildren will be working like slaves to pay off this debt, so that the Bushes and Cheneys can live the high life in Dubai.

    Yeah, they're patriots, Bush&Co. They wear flag pins. And hide the money they stole from America in Dubai.

    And they want me to believe that Obama is a socialist. Right.

    In case you think McCain is any different than Bush, watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdJUCU1UH2w

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/30/2008 8:04:59 AM

    fter 9/11, the US government started rounding up Muslims without cause and without due process of law, like we did to the Japanese Americans in WWII. The Bush administration called it's main internment camp Guantanamo Bay. While there are certainly many guilty terrorists held in Guantanamo, there are also many innocent American citizens who have been held illegally for years without even being charged with any crime. They have been tortured by our government. Some of them have died.

    Recently the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration in the matter of Guantanamo Bay. The Supreme Court Justices were NOT on the side of the terrorists. They were on the side of the Geneva Convention, that says you can not torture POWs, and on the side of US laws that state you can not imprison a person without charging them with a crime and bringing them to trial. I'm sure that like most Americans, the Justices who voted against the illegal, immoral doings at Guantanamo didn't feel sympathy for the terrorists. They felt sympathy for the laws of AMERICA, the land of the FREE, where even rat finks get a fair trial.

    Meanwhile, back in Iraq, the Bush administration is busy trying to build a smokescreen to hide the CRIMES they have committed. Those pesky weapons of mass destruction. Just think, the National Debt went up over 6 trillion dollars under Bush. More than 2 TRILLION of it went directly into the pockets of Halliburton, a corporation owned by the Cheney family. Halliburton is now a DUBAI corporation and therefore is not subject to US taxes. All that money they took out of the US Treasury is going into the coffers of a MUSLIM country.

    Did you hear about how the US government is being charged millions for Halliburton deliveries of sand into Iraq from Kuwait? Sand. Like there is a shortage of sand in Iraq? Another contractor shipped sand from Idaho to Iraq at our expense. Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz discusses these and other excesses of our current government's out of control spending in Iraq.

    Your grandchildren will be working like slaves to pay off this debt, so that the Bushes and Cheneys can live the high life in Dubai.

    Yeah, they're patriots, Bush&Co. They wear flag pins. And hide the money they stole from America in Dubai.

    And they want me to believe that Obama is a socialist. Right.

    In case you think McCain is any different than Bush, watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdJUCU1UH2w

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/30/2008 8:04:38 AM

    THE GREAT BUSH DEPRESSION
    I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.
    He perfectly predicted the current meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen next
    is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.
    The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide ,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch , Fanny and Freddy Mae ,AIG
    The government took them over because they are bankrupt. Even with the goverment nationalizing hundreds of billions of dollars in debt the stock market is crashing
    the credit markets are frozen and all of us may suffer beyond anything seen in generations
    McCain just like Bush " doesn't understand the economy".
    That not just my opinion its his own words. Not only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand how its been broken.
    It is no surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities use quantum mathematical models very few people understand.
    Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.
    Bush's economic advisor Phil Graham wrote the deregulation bill that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.
    Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury.
    No one in this country can afford for that to happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He was the last to know somthing was wrong. Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime. Check out this link to the truth http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
    It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be
    even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a budget surplus like Bush did but a crashing economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit. Most of it Bush created and it will take decades to pay it back.
    If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.
    When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.
    So why are the polls even close then ?
    Mccains team just said they no longer want to talk about the economy.Instead they would like to spend time talking about obama
    which means running the biggest smear campaign in history.
    They think they can just tell you lies and you wont be smart enough to see through it
    Let's teach him we are smarter than that
    Stand up and hold them accountable
    Bush isn't on the ballot this year but his policies are
    Elect Obama Biden 2008






    Check out this video of sarah palins interview and ask your self if she understands what she is talking about.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 10/30/2008 8:04:27 AM

    THE GREAT BUSH DEPRESSION
    I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.
    He perfectly predicted the current meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen next
    is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.
    The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide ,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch , Fanny and Freddy Mae ,AIG
    The government took them over because they are bankrupt. Even with the goverment nationalizing hundreds of billions of dollars in debt the stock market is crashing
    the credit markets are frozen and all of us may suffer beyond anything seen in generations
    McCain just like Bush " doesn't understand the economy".
    That not just my opinion its his own words. Not only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand how its been broken.
    It is no surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities use quantum mathematical models very few people understand.
    Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.
    Bush's economic advisor Phil Graham wrote the deregulation bill that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.
    Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury.
    No one in this country can afford for that to happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He was the last to know somthing was wrong. Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime. Check out this link to the truth http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
    It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be
    even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a budget surplus like Bush did but a crashing economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit. Most of it Bush created and it will take decades to pay it back.
    If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.
    When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.
    So why are the polls even close then ?
    Mccains team just said they no longer want to talk about the economy.Instead they would like to spend time talking about obama
    which means running the biggest smear campaign in history.
    They think they can just tell you lies and you wont be smart enough to see through it
    Let's teach him we are smarter than that
    Stand up and hold them accountable
    Bush isn't on the ballot this year but his policies are
    Elect Obama Biden 2008






    Check out this video of sarah palins interview and ask your self if she understands what she is talking about.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ

  • Posted By: youwannaname @ 10/30/2008 6:17:49 AM

    Religious extremists are always proclaiming war in the name of God- no wonder he never shows up- they are always breeding the idea of prejudice of others- and they almost always create war and misery- these all seem to have terrorist leanings- it doesnt matter what religion you are talking about- when your veiws become extreme they are always unhealthy

  • Posted By: AzraelDarkAngel540 @ 10/29/2008 5:57:14 PM

    Your White Christ was an ordinary human being albeit a good one but not a God... And he was strung out on a cross not to save mankind (oh how touching!) but because he was seen as a criminal.. If he was truly guilty or innocent is beyond me but the fact is that as Nietzsche said "God is dead!"

    Sarah Palin would do well not to use something which has no base ato back her up...

    • Posted By: tumordoctor @ 10/29/2008 7:03:44 PM

      Well, actually it's Nietzsche that's dead. And one day you will be too. You'd better hope that you're both right.

      • Posted By: elithian @ 10/29/2008 10:25:07 PM

        So, just how long has N been dead. Perhaps he is not really dead; maybe he is in Hell or something. Ever think about that? What really appens after death? What is eternity. Where is it? Why is it. You really should think this through because you looking kind of foolish out there

        • Posted By: AzraelDarkAngel540 @ 10/30/2008 4:20:14 AM

          I am searching for this Truth... I am just dissatisfied and far from convinced with the versions bible-beaters come up with...

      • Posted By: AzraelDarkAngel540 @ 10/29/2008 7:48:43 PM

        Well Jesus died too and he's still dead buddy... No ones knows what happens after death, no one, you can all fling your bible at me but there is no hard evidence that it is true, it is a self-contradictory text written by humans and not handed down by God... divine inspiration my foot! Holy Spirit? The only spirit that is holy is found in a bottle...

        • Posted By: NPeters @ 10/29/2008 9:17:48 PM

          Correct me if I'm wrong Mr. Dark Angel but wasn't Azrael a smurf or hang out with smurf's?

          • Posted By: elithian @ 10/29/2008 10:21:18 PM

            Azrael is actually the name of a Demon associated with Lucifer and the fallen angels in hell. HmBem, so there you are. Been missing you but see you soon.
            Your Friend
            Death

            • Posted By: AzraelDarkAngel540 @ 10/30/2008 4:18:54 AM

              A misconception. Azrael is as FlyingScot so aptly put, couldn't have put it better myself...

              The reason I took up the nickname of Azrael is because according to legend he was an Outcast, just as I am in my own country for not being Roman Catholic..

            • Posted By: FlyingScot @ 10/29/2008 11:09:54 PM

              Azrael is the Islamic Archangel of Death. It is an English form of the Arabic name Azra'il (??????????????) or Azra'eil (????????????), the name traditionally attributed to the angel of death in Islam and some Hebrew lore.[1] The Qur'an never uses this name, referring instead to Malaikat al-Maut (which translates directly as angels of death; not one angel). Since it is mentioned in neither the Qur'an nor Hadith, it is not part of the religion. It is thought by some to be legendary or adapted from other religions. It is also spelled Izrail, Izrael, Azrail, Ezraeil, Azraille, Azryel, or Ozryel. Chambers English dictionary uses the spelling Azrael. The name literally means Whom God Helps.[1]

            • Posted By: FlyingScot @ 10/29/2008 11:08:55 PM

              Azrael is the Islamic Archangel of Death. It is an English form of the Arabic name Azra'il (??????????????) or Azra'eil (????????????), the name traditionally attributed to the angel of death in Islam and some Hebrew lore.[1] The Qur'an never uses this name, referring instead to Malaikat al-Maut (which translates directly as angels of death; not one angel). Since it is mentioned in neither the Qur'an nor Hadith, it is not part of the religion. It is thought by some to be legendary or adapted from other religions. It is also spelled Izrail, Izrael, Azrail, Ezraeil, Azraille, Azryel, or Ozryel. Chambers English dictionary uses the spelling Azrael. The name literally means Whom God Helps.[1]

          • Posted By: AzraelDarkAngel540 @ 10/30/2008 4:16:59 AM

            well hate to disappoint you NPeters but you're wrong... Did I spoil your day?

  • Posted By: Vivi @ 10/30/2008 4:02:25 AM

    HEY! This article forum is an especially personal and very nasty one, so I'm warning you in advance.

    I will give you the synopsis and you can decide whether to wander into this hate-swamp or not.

    The article is about Palin, yet from the very first post it became about Obama and his religion.

    On the defensive, without missing a beat, neocons began clamoring about how newsweek could dare write about Palin's religion (which we all know she injects into every political stump speech anyway), when NOTHING, they scream, has been written about Obama's religion.

    On this very site, for those who aren't just feigning ignorance, is a cover story all about Obama and his spiritual/ religious beliefs.

    I have mentioned this to the swarms of posters claiming Obama is a "proven Muslim," not one seemed to care much for the facts (I guess wild conspiracies theories are less fun with facts in the mix). I think most if not all these people know Obama is a Christian or realize that it makes no difference- Muslims are not bad people.

    Then, the religious fervor broke out, and squabbling began over the existence of God and the threat posed by modern "witchcraft," the pentecostal church was jilted by mainstream protestants, naturally, Obama's stance against outlawing abortion was used as evidence to somehow prove he was a Muslim(?) (who are actually waay more socially conservative than Christians anyway), Lefties called Palin a nut case freak and witch hunter, Righties -well- they pulled out the Rev. Wright card they'd been itching to use, slandered all Muslims as a vile people, and dismissed Africans as holding on to primitive tribal beliefs in witchdoctors ans such. Palin was praised as a true Christian for opposing abortion (not actually a Christian platform, but no one cares), and then called a secessionist, Obama was accused some more of being a "fake" Christian and/or "closet" Muslim, the separation of church and state was fought over, and a few insightful comments even snuck in.

    If I haven't scared you away, I implore you to do your due diligence and educate yourself, research a thought before you claim it is fact, take all these heated posts with a handful(!) of salt, ignore ALL CAPS FLARE POSTS, and try not to be a douche bag.

  • Posted By: Concerned Canadian @ 10/29/2008 11:29:13 PM

    600 trillion dollars later ....Barack Hussein Obama still can't beat McCain who's running his campaign from the back of his pickup truck...Obama is just "plastic".

    • Posted By: snchen12 @ 10/30/2008 2:33:46 AM

      he's a media facade, like a fairy tale movie. yeah, let's vote for "happily ever after"!

  • Posted By: bluebloodedLV @ 10/29/2008 7:11:02 PM

    I cannot believe the hypocrites on this blog. You say journalism is dead and that no one will ask any questions in search of truth. Then when they ask about Palins crackpot witch ceremony you get all pissed off. CRY BABIES. You all sound totally ridiculous talking out of both sides of your mouth! Unbelievable. You can bring up Rev. Wright and act like he gave the same sermon day in and day out for 20 years, which no one has been able to prove that Obama was even there for the "God Damn America" comments that Wright said. Then FINALLY after weeks of this video being out, we ask about this BS witch ceremony it's "oh, leave poor Sarah alone." We can PROVE she was there voluntarily. The dems and liberals haven't been throwing a fit about this but you all STILL bring up Rev. Wright, a topic that is OLD NEWS. If we're supposed to ignore this Palin ceremony, then you need to give it up with Rev. Wright.

    This group of ignorant, narrow minded freaks that the republican party has diminished to is seriously embarrassing and disgusting. How do you hypocrites sleep at night?

    • Posted By: benkrapf @ 10/30/2008 2:15:09 AM

      Rush Limbaugh's oxycontin helps.

  • Posted By: scooterbug @ 10/29/2008 7:16:07 PM

    Mega Buck churches financing the GOP??? McCain has spent about $80-85M on his campaign versus, Obama's 1/2 bilion....so tell me where is that money coming from????Obama of course keeps that a secret too.
    Everyone that has a job is already paying taxes and redistributing their income...enough is enough...Obama wants working people to give even more and more. The doesn't count the benefits of grants, scholarships etc etc, that goes to minorites, and paid by whites...enough is enough. The recent tax cut will be allowed to expire, which means a tax increase for everyone that is working. Get it through your head Dems, Obama isn't even qualified to be president. 5 months as a Senator?? O really???

    • Posted By: snchen12 @ 10/29/2008 10:11:44 PM

      this is an example of Obama's use of people's money. He takes it ALL and uses it on himself. Good thing I didn't give money to him. He wasted his Obama-cult followers' money on his ostentatious DNC stage, his private jet trips, his thousands of TV ads (meant for brainwashing), the insignia "President" (not "candidate") on his leather seat on his private jet, and who knows what else. This guy is all about himself. Hope you guys see that before it's too late! Obama is seriously very CULTISH.

      • Posted By: benkrapf @ 10/30/2008 2:14:32 AM

        He is a politician.

        McCain has poor character. Which is worse?

      • Posted By: Pia1981 @ 10/29/2008 10:25:53 PM

        You are seriously ridiculous.

  • Posted By: dunklertod @ 10/29/2008 10:38:39 AM

    And Obama is a Muslim extremist. i dont see any news articles on that....

    • Posted By: Vivi @ 10/30/2008 2:11:29 AM

      They're right after the articles about McCain's evil twin, if you get to the articles about Batboy, you've gone to far.

      Astounding ignorance. I'll keep an eye out for your shame.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse