Will My Marriage Last?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: wisterley @ 11/02/2008 8:25:35 AM

    Congratulations. However, you'll find that your marriage, even if it's allowed to stand, will mean little in practical terms. I married my partner of 35 years 5 years ago. We have made our lives together for almost 40 years. We still cant file a joint tax return or inherit each other's pension. We went to Canada to marry. Our governor here in New York has declared our marriage to be legal. All I've got s far is a $6 reduction in our auto insurance.
    It's shocking and saddening to read the foul slanders and lies adopted by the pro 8 zealots. If such language were used against any other segment of the population there would be an outcry. So what is really a struggle to claim our civil rights has been turned into a fantasy about children. I am almost at the point where I don't care any more if same-sex marriage becomes legal or not. I'm not sure I want to join the larger community in a country where such ignorance and vitriol is the currency of public debate.
    Marriage is a civil institution. Couples marry in a church under license from the state. That two men, or two women, should marry each other threatens no one. To pretend that it does is, at best, a lie.
    Good luck to you. May your marriage bring you joy.

    • Posted By: Suttonhoo @ 11/02/2008 6:10:10 PM

      No wonder you are disappointed. The purpose of marriage is not to get a deduction on your auto insurance, and it has nothing to do with your right to inherit. Government takes an interest in the marriage institution because it is the best way to bring up and to nurture the next generation of citizens. That is why society has such a strong interest in protecting it from becoming merely a legal recognition of a close relationship between two consenting adults.

    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 11/02/2008 10:35:47 AM

      By the way, the medical notification goes to the "next of kin", which for gays and lesbians whose families disapprove of their actions, is not likely to produce a lot of positivity.

      You can get around all of this with the appropriate forms, but the forms have significant delays in processing compared to traditional marriage forms ("separate but equal" never really is) and so it's still not close to fair.

    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 11/02/2008 10:34:07 AM

      The biggest reason that gay marriage is a big deal is because paramedics can't let a civil partner ride in an ambulance or be admitted to a hospital room without hobbling documentation in a medical emergency. If the partner knows significant details about the other partner's condition, this is potentially life-threatening.

      My guess is that within ten years or so, exactly this is going to happen in a banned-gay-marriage state and that there's going to be a massive and controversial trial that will tear all this open again no matter what passes in three days.

  • Posted By: RELODEN @ 11/02/2008 5:12:29 PM

    If marriage is so freakin' holy then divorce should be outlawed. Why aren't we voting to do THAT?

  • Posted By: joe 6pack @ 11/02/2008 12:31:15 PM

    The Democrat party promotes gay marriage in the party platform, therefore, the Democrat party is gay for gay marriage.

    VOTING FOR A DEMOCRAT IS GAY

    DON'T BE GAY

    Unless you want to see more of this depravity.

    • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 11/02/2008 2:54:22 PM

      Well then call me Happy! I voted for Obama Saturday!

      Have a nice day Bigot!

      • Posted By: joe 6pack @ 11/02/2008 3:03:30 PM

        Disapproval of depravity does not a bigot make. And protecting oneself and family from the consiquences of said depravity is not unfair discrimination.

  • Posted By: joe 6pack @ 11/01/2008 8:42:55 PM

    Thank you Democrats for being gay for gay marriage

    VOTING FOR A DEMOCRAT IS GAY


    DON'T BE GAY


    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 11/02/2008 10:26:51 AM

      Thanks for being enough of a homophobe to illustrate your position in language that fails to impress in the least.

      • Posted By: joe 6pack @ 11/02/2008 12:27:44 PM

        Homosexuality is a sick depraved sexual perversion. Nothing homophobic in pointing out that the Democrat party loves this depravity. It's just a fact. Check out thier party platform if you don't believe me.

        VOTING FOR A DEMOCRAT IS GAY.

        DON'T BE GAY.


  • Posted By: refaz @ 11/01/2008 6:47:23 PM

    Abused spouses, abused children, high divorce rates, multiple marriages, co-habitation, out-of-wedlock births - yup, many of us heterosexuals are doing a great job of upholding the sanctity of marriage and family.

    • Posted By: ernestt @ 11/01/2008 8:23:03 PM

      Lemme see, the failings of heterosexual relationships are not an excuse to say that same sex marriage should be okay and legal.

      With regards to the political statements of over zealous supporters of Obama and Palin, the gay couple in West Hollywood wanted to have "fun" during Halloween with their effigy of Palin by hanging her. Some example of "nonviolent". It finally took some days before some gay representatives in their local community convinced the couple to take it down because it would give the predominantly gay neighborhood a bad image. Also, a man with an effigy started to hang an effigy of "Chad" on a pole on the back of his pick up in front of their home if the couple wouldn't take Palin down. There was no out cry from the gay community to force the gay couple to take it down.

      The Obama incident with the Latina woman was a one day incident. She made her statement with her Halloween decorations and made a public statement as to why she did it in opposition to the values that Obama stood for. It was her way of demonstrating her political opposition.

      By the way, if Obama get elected, he had better get used to seeing and viewing images of him a black person hanging and being burned in effigy over seas. The foreign protestors do it regularly to white politicians and have what is seemed like a greater freedom of expression to express their displeasure than the good ole USA. Our black secretary of state, Rice had effigy of her self hung up in the past.

      • Posted By: ghostmasseur @ 11/02/2008 10:24:02 AM

        Errnest, most of actually the foreign country protestors do NOT have more rights to freedom of expression thatn those in the US. IF they burned effigies of thier own leaders they would mosst likely be slaughtered or tortured. "Freedom of Expression" is only alllowed in those countries when the expression is aligned with what the leadership thinks.

        I found the hanging Palin to be in bad taste, but it was a perfect example of how ownderful our rights to freedom of expression operate. Personally I would have preferred a mural of a wolf shooting down a plane with a rifle toting Palin with a LAWS rocket as a form of protest to the obscene practice of hunting wolves from planes. I believe in the right to arm bears. (And I am not an opponent of responsible gun ownership or of responsible hunting.)

        I can all but assure you that Obama is far to intelligent to take offense at what foriegn nationals do, just as Rice is too intelligent to take offense at the burning of her effigy.

      • Posted By: ghostmasseur @ 11/02/2008 10:15:36 AM

        "Lemme see, the failings of heterosexual relationships are not an excuse to say that same sex marriage should be okay and legal."

        Actually they do show that many of the arguments that same-sex marraige will somehow cuase harm to society or that idiiotic argument that it will somehow harm the "institution of marraige" are invalid.

        No one has shown one valid reason why sme-sex marriage will harm said instiution or harm society. The argument that children need both parents is not valid since the preponderence of single parentts children living healthy lives and growing up to be successful and productive members of society shows that argument to be a lie as well. Also it leaves ot the simple fact that many children of gays and lesbians (both single parents and couples) DO have opposite sex influential people in their lives. The most imporatnt thing that a child can have in their life is a loving caring parent. and having two loving and caring parents (regardless of gender) is even better. The only trauama that children of same-sex parents experience is caused by outsiders who do nto have the humanity, deceny or intelligence to keep their views to themselves and insit on attacking gays and lesbians, as well as passing said hatred and actions prediliction to their chidlren thereby creating a new generation of mental misfits. Now I am not saying that all people who oppose same-sex marriage engage in such activity or teach their children to be hatemongers. In fact I would ventrue that the majority of same-sex marraige opponents are appalled by the actions of those peole who do engage in such actions, but there are enough out there who do to cause harm to the children of same-sex couples and gay or lesbian single parents. .

    • Posted By: HAL--- @ 11/02/2008 10:17:13 AM

      The same can be said of gay couples.

  • Posted By: Twister52 @ 10/31/2008 12:22:48 AM

    To the author: Dude, you're thinking is whacked.

    The practice of homosexuality is a SIN. Eventually you will see that. The masses can whine all they want about how to not allow homosexual marriage is repressive, isn't "fair", hurts their feelings or whatever. But one thing the pro-gay crowd is missing is the fact that right and wrong, good and bad, truth vs. fantasy, is not decided by popular vote or by emotion or even what might make sense to people. It is decided by God and ONLY by God.

    And nowhere....NOWHERE!.....in scriptures ancient or modern has God EVER said that the practice of homosexual desires is morally acceptable.

    May God bless all those who love Him and who aren't afraid to call a spade a spade.

    • Posted By: HAL--- @ 10/31/2008 12:40:38 AM

      It's not too late. Abandon the gay lifestyle. That doesn't mean you have to become a practicing heterosexual...but you can not continue practicing homosexuality. How can you expect God to bless you when you go against his word? Gay love is not a love from God.

      Leviticus 18:22: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."

      Romans 1:26-27: "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet."

      • Posted By: slaxx @ 10/31/2008 1:35:27 AM

        Comment: wow Hal and Twister..is that all you two have? the bible? i thought jesus dies for our sins? by the way, with your hate-filled speech, you're committing sins that are much worse than loving someone of the same sex.

        in case you forgot:

        "Love your neighbor as yourself."
        "Judge not, lest ye be judged."
        "Whatsoever you do to the least of your brothers, you do unto me."
        "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God."

        you're not following Jesus's teachings, but the words of men who has their own agendas. do you really know why the bible is against male homosexuality and masterbation? because they lived at a time when they thought that sperm was all that was needed for procreation; they didn't understand the role of the egg. therefore, masterbation and sodomy was seen as a waste fo life.

        also, the bile says nothing about lesbianism, so lesbianism isn't a sin.

        • Posted By: HAL--- @ 10/31/2008 2:14:19 AM

          No one said anything about "hate." As for Jesus dying for our sins...it only works if you repent. it's not a -get out of jail free- card. And you missed my quote on lesbianism. Read a little before making a stupid comment next time.

          • Posted By: ghostmasseur @ 10/31/2008 5:34:57 PM

            Religion is irrelevant to the law, as is your god.

            Your god has no authority or power over me. (Of course I am heterosexual but he still is of no consequence to me.)

            • Posted By: HAL--- @ 11/02/2008 12:49:00 AM

              ...and your point is?

      • Posted By: Kyon @ 11/01/2008 1:16:45 AM

        I will start following th word of God when you bring me absolute and irrefutable evidence of his existence. No unexplained phenomena, not a book, no mere coincedences; irrefutable proof.

    • Posted By: slaxx @ 10/31/2008 1:44:17 AM

      hey dude, if you're against gay marriage, don't marry another man. if you think homosexuality's a sin, then don't practice it. it's that simple. mind your business and get a life.

      • Posted By: ernestt @ 11/01/2008 4:59:37 AM

        Easy for you to say!!! Why don't the supporters get out of the school system and stop indoctrinating our kids that your life style is "normal". Why does the schools have to be in my kid's face about your life style??? Get the gay indoctrination out of the schools and then I can agree with you about leaing you alone with your "marriage" don't mess with my kids.

    • Posted By: vstillwell @ 10/31/2008 12:26:50 PM

      Because you say it's so then it must be, right? Don't force your beliefs on someone else you small minded twit.

      • Posted By: Andrew Delo @ 11/01/2008 2:52:37 AM

        You're a spade, you half-wit.
        If you want to talk about what God wants, please show me the fax He sent you saying what He wants.
        Otherwise, you know just about as well as you know what the Bible says.
        p,s,,,,,it is illegal for this decision to be made on religious grounds.
        :)

    • Posted By: TheVigil @ 10/31/2008 11:34:20 AM

      "It is decided by God and ONLY by God."

      My conception of God diverges rather steadily from yours.

      Do you believe that I have the right to understand my God in a different way than you do? If not, do you think that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment should be repealed?

      I can't get an answer to this.

    • Posted By: Red Meat Democrat @ 10/31/2008 8:59:28 AM

      No one has ever proved that the bible is the word of god. For that matter no one has ever proved that there is a god.

  • Posted By: CAskeeter @ 11/01/2008 2:42:56 AM

    To deny two people the right to marry is unconscionable and unforgivable. You worship a false God if you believe otherwise and we don't deserve to be recognized as a civilized nation or a society with decent moral values. I'm sorry, but your interpretation of religious beliefs does not give you or anyone else the right to treat one citizen of our country or even visitor to it with any less rights than any other. To do so, pushes us back to barbaric times when people were punished even to the death for not believing in a prevaling doctrine, religious or otherwise. So,I voted against this ludicrous repeal of a California law because it violates the constitutional rights of a segment of our citizenry. I am not gay, nor do I necessarily personally endorse the gay lifestyle, but that doesn't matter. What I do value above everything is the constitution of these United States and the rights to personal liberty that guarantees. To deny someone these, as is the case currently in 47 of the States, is a disgraceful and pathetic hypocrisy and blatantly illegal.

    • Posted By: ernestt @ 11/01/2008 4:28:11 PM

      What kind of rediculous nonsense reasoning is this???? There are all kinds of regulation in the marriage situation. The most common one is are you still married and if you are is the divorce finalized. Now why do you think they have this question or restriction? Two people still love each other. Maybe the divorce wasn't finalized yet but it probably will be. Does it make any difference if I have two wives or two husbands? Why shouldn't it be legalized? Why are those that want two hubbies or two wives prosecuted? So what if there are kids involved? You show your pathetic hypocrisy and disgrace when you deny these types of relationships.

      • Posted By: rogerhall @ 11/01/2008 8:50:22 PM

        What a terrible burden it must be to be the only sane person on the planet, and to be unable to find anyone else worthy of respect. </snark>

  • Posted By: middle of the road @ 11/01/2008 12:15:50 AM

    If one strongly follows a faith that sanctifies only the marriage of man and woman, then it is understandable that one would fight for that belief as well. If there was a movement to allow adults to marry children would it be wrong that many in a community or country would aggressive fight against that? Psychologically, it is obvious that homosexuality is as engrained in individuals as is heterosexuality. But biologically, there is no question that homosexuality defies the natural order of things. Procreation is a most fundamental instinct and purpose in all creatures, human or otherwise. Homosexuality while socially and psychologically acceptable to some, is religiously and biologically repulsive to others. It is an aberration that bypasses the natural order of things. When a gay couple can naturally consumate their marriage with an offspring, then I will be among those who are willing to accept homosexuality as normal human behavior.

    • Posted By: jtaustin @ 11/01/2008 6:48:19 PM

      middle of the rode - you wrote "When a gay couple can naturally consummate their marriage with an offspring, then I will be among those who are willing to accept homosexuality as normal human behavior."

      So, following your logic: you believe that infertile heterosexuals should also be denied the right to marry?

    • Posted By: rogerhall @ 11/01/2008 12:20:47 AM

      The natural order of things includes homosexuality in all mammals. It has been conserved in our genetics for millennia. There is a zoo in northern Europe exhibiting 115 species of animals living in homosexual relationships. I'm sure that's not what you were taught, but that is "the natural order of things".

      Besides, we don't require fertility tests before marriage, do we? Children are not guaranteed from marriage, and many childless couples live happy, fulfilling lives.

      This is just another bogus argument for this particular brand of fascism.

  • Posted By: RandyHiggins @ 11/01/2008 6:14:57 PM

    People who are responsible and productive members of society always bear the burden of the misguided and cavalier. When the West Hollywood window dressers decided that the best thing they could do was hang an effigy of Sarah Palin they threw away the good will that has been developed by others. When Gavin Newsome rants, "...whether you like it or not.." he sends a chill down the spines of people who want to feel like it's safe to raise children in California. Parents don't want to have 'the talk' with small children about why they don't have permission to attend their teacher's wedding.

    Is it painful when some don't get the recognition they want? Is it painful when some may not feel affirmed by society? Is it painful to see people who are hurt by their neighbors? In all cases yes. But, a parent finds it more painful to see children reject the principles and values that they are teaching. Parents are being muzzled and sidelined, while flamboyant displays of 'rights' are raised by strangers.

  • Posted By: ObamaYesWeCan @ 11/01/2008 5:27:16 PM

    This moronic scumbag Samuel J. Wurzelbacher "Joe the Plumber" had his AZ driver license suspended

    http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/128323

    Wurzelbacher, who lived in Mesa in 2000 and had an Arizona driver's license, had his driver's license suspended by the Arizona Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Division on May 4, 2000, following a nonpayment of a court-imposed fine for civil traffic violations, according to court records.

    ...owes nearly $1,200 in back taxes, according to public records, still owes more than $700 to the Mesa court system.

    Records show he was cited for failure to stop at a red light and for failure to provide proof of insurance on Feb. 9, 2000, in a black Dodge truck at the intersection of Dobson and Baseline roads in Mesa.

    After failing to pay his original fine of $627.50 issued in March 2000, his license was suspended and the fine was handed over to a collection agency along with a 16 percent surcharge. The now-resident of Holland, Ohio, still owes $727.90 to the Mesa Municipal Court, according to court records.


    Hopefully the collection agency will break both of his legs so he'll never be able to walk nor work ever again. This typical Republican scumbag deserves it.

  • Posted By: Vypurr @ 11/01/2008 2:32:04 PM

    The opponents of Proposition 8 shouldn't worry. Even if the measure is passes, a federal court will very likely overturn the election as they did with Prop. 187... simply negate the voice of the people of California and gay marriage will be allowed.

    • Posted By: ghostmasseur @ 11/01/2008 5:24:54 PM

      Vypurr,

      "simply negate the voice of the people of California and gay marriage will be allowed."

      And the court would be correct and justified to negate the unconstitutional action by the people in the EXACT SAME WAY that the Supreme Court in the Loving case justly realized that the voice of the people of Virginia was invalid in its desire to prevent interracial marriages.

      Just because the people want something does not make them correct or justifed under the US Constitution.

  • Posted By: zivo24 @ 11/01/2008 1:48:07 AM

    It strikes me that no one sees the incredibly hypocritical irony of the very verbiage of same-sex marriage bans in relation to the intent to "defend the santity of marriage".

    "One man, one woman".

    So, the way to defend the santity of marriage is to enact a law that states that what two people have between their legs is more important than what they have in their hearts?

    Penis? Check.

    Vagina? Check.

    Ok, you can get married. No, it doesn't matter if you love or even like each other or really see this union lasting. You passed the genitalia test. That's all that really matters.

    I would just like to know when we are going to figure out that if we are ever, as a nation, are ever to fulfill the ideals of freedom, justicve and equality that make us the greatest nation on earth..that voting on each other's rights to be treated fairly and equally under the law is unacceptable!

    My civil and constitutional rights are not your's to give or take..and visa versa.

    Even if Prop 8 passes, this won't be the last word. Not even close. Gay Americans and the families and friends who love them will never stop fighting for equality.

    I'm a Coloradan and worked on the No on 2 campaign back in 1992. Amendment 2 was a law backed by many of the same names and groups as Prop 8. It denied gay Coloradans legal recourse if they were fired or denied public accommodations based on their sexual orientation. It was ruled unconstiutional by the US Supreme Court because it "fenced out" a specific segment of people and denied them the same rights as others. Same sex marriage bans will eventually meet the same fate.

    Lastly, I would like to leave you with a story about a man named Ralph Carr, who was the republican governor of Colorado when Pearl Harbor was attacked.

    He was the only political leader who to speak out against the injustice of interning Americans of Japanese ancestry.

    His stand at a time when anti-Japanese sentiment was profound was not popular and it cost him his job.

    But today, he is remembered as a wise and courageous man who knew that discrimination didn't just hurt the people it was directed at.

    "He sacrificed his political career to bravely confront the often dark side of human nature. "If you harm them, you must harm me. I was brought up in a small town where I knew the shame and dishonor of race hatred. I grew to despise it because it threatened the happiness of you and you and you." Carr's selfless devotion to all Americans, while destroying his hopes for a senate seat, did in the end become extolled as, "a small voice but a strong voice."

    We all need to be more like Ralph Carr.








    We need more leaders like Ralph Carr.

    • Posted By: ernestt @ 11/01/2008 5:07:34 PM

      Let me see.....my civil rights are not your's to give or take and vise versa..... So......if I hold a religious first amendment beilef that exposing my children in school to the indoctrination that is forced not optional and no parental notification is wrong......where does stand on gay marriage......

      The gay agenda has been in print and is no secret.... to change America's culturally to accept fully their lifestyle....whether through stealth or playing the minority victim or daring people to brutalize them so they can be a poster child of intolerance or bigotry any thing to get what they want.... Unfortunately, they have the resource advantages (no kids) to support.....They have softened up the media.....Yes, it was in 1987 when I was first exposed to the gay lifestyle in your face. My children and I were eating supper and watching a sitcom together......There were two teenage boys kissing in front on the screen....I yelled to my son to give me the remote......The following day, I yanked out the cable box and got my refund.....Yes, the media has softened up the population to be exploited by the gay activitist to get equality for their life style.....Soon push came to shove for the domestic partnership.....Gays said that marriages wouln NOT be threatened. Backers of Prop 22 wasn't so sure....Then local officials began last year to agitate for marriages at city hall.......We had a weak governor who just punted the issue to the courts for more delay.....and the rest is history....NO the gays are not satisfied with NO of PROP 8, their agenda is one of domination and intolerance of any and all who oppose their lifestyle agenda. Look at Canada, and look at Massachusettes.

      NO this is not just an issue of gay rights agenda, this is one of religious freedom......your belief system is at stake.....if it is in conflict with the gay rights agenda---you will lose each and every time.......hands down...So.....as long as there is organized religion and people of religious beliefs, people of faith will continue to do battle on what they perceive as immoral regardless of the legality of gay marriage.....Don't forget, what is granted by the government can be taken back and denied......

  • Posted By: zivo24 @ 11/01/2008 1:48:22 AM


    And just one more thing...To Sheebe...

    You keep saying that you don't want your grandchildren "to learn it in grade school".

    Learn WHAT?

    That gay people exist?

    Let's forget for a second that they are going to see gay people in everyday life anyway...on TV, in the movies, in real life...

    Do you believe that knowing about gay people is going to make them gay?

    Do you believe that you son "turned" gay from finding out about gay people?

    I don't believe you do.]

    So what are you afraid of them learning? Have you not read that the head of education in California has said that the Prop 8 ads that try to scare people by saying that their kids will be taught about homosexulity if it doesn't pass is baloney? If not, go back and read the above article again.

    And if you really love your son..which I believe you do..you should HOPE that kids grow up learning that gay people are their equals. It would quite a few of those children that you're worried about the pain and torment that most gay people..your son included, I'm sure..endured, from others, during their journey to self-acceptance.

    • Posted By: ernestt @ 11/01/2008 4:49:59 PM

      Perhaps you fail to consider the morals and the religious beliefs of family, parents, and children. Just because the gay lifestyle is all around us doesn't mean it has to be in your face..... Listening to another political figure on Prop 8 education department is like listening to a uses car salesman..... Of course he is going to agree to the party line of the gay agenda if he wants to keep his job.....

      It is the gay agenda lifestyle that wants no not merely wants but actually seeks to indoctrinate without parental opt out or notification kindergarten children that it is okay, it is not wrong. It is diametrically in oppositon to what a majority of parents believe in. It is turning what is the beliefs of parents in the right belief system and turning it upside down with out the parent's notification. I have view the two segments of the instructors video that public school teachers are using in their training..... No, it is the video version of MAO's little red book......

  • Posted By: liberaltms @ 11/01/2008 1:55:35 AM

    Those who would deny homosexuals equal rights are simply wrong-headed and mean-spirited. Christians who say that gay weddings are wrong argue that marriage is "sacred." Will divorce be the next target of religious extremists? What about other personal aspects of our lives? Do Christians follow every single tenet of their faith or do they simply pick and chose those which they deem worthy of their support or objects of their scorn? I am neither homosexual nor religious, but to those who would deny basic rights to gay folks because they are labeled "sinners," I say, "Let he among you who is without sin cast the first stone." To those whose empathy and human vision is impaired by the timber in your own eye, I say, "Judge not lest ye be judged." As someone who will celebrate my 43rd wedding anniversary this month, I offer another rule: "Live and let live."

    • Posted By: ernestt @ 11/01/2008 4:41:11 PM

      What a typical liberal!!! You conveniently forget the part following casting the first stone..... No, Jesus didn't say live and let live...... He said go and SIN no more...... The part about the beam in the eye...... Jesus said take PERSONAL responsibilitiy..... Liberals conveniently skirt the responsibilities of the Christian life and indulge in the feely touchy parts of love in Christianity......

  • Posted By: bigandsexy @ 11/01/2008 2:42:18 AM

    Homosexuality is a sin, but so is divorce. I am a Christian but I am tired of how the church and religious right are persecuting gay people. The Bible says to take the plank out of your own eye before trying to get the splinter out of your neighbor's eye. Until we as heterosexualy start respecting marriage, how can we say that allowing gay couples to marry will cause the destruction of historical marriage? I will pray for and love everyone regardless of their sexual orientation and until I am perfect I will not judge or try to force my moral beliefs on anyone.

    • Posted By: ernestt @ 11/01/2008 4:35:15 PM

      Yes we shouldn't take the splinter out of another person's eye but you are like many Christians who feel we should just let love cover a multitude of sins but fail, forget, or conveniently ignore the continuing words of Jesus.....Go and sin no more..... You ignore the watchman's duty to warn of significant sin to those who are entrapped in this life style......

  • Posted By: jstark99 @ 10/30/2008 7:34:31 PM

    The anatomy of the male and female human body will forever stand as a silent witness against 'gay marriages'.

    • Posted By: rogerhall @ 11/01/2008 2:19:05 PM

      I am often bemused by the right-wing focus on gentials.

      "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

    • Posted By: Andrew Delo @ 11/01/2008 3:05:31 AM

      You're a silent idiot.

  • Posted By: HAL--- @ 11/01/2008 12:27:46 PM

    www.ProtectMarriage.com

  • Posted By: HAL--- @ 11/01/2008 12:23:04 PM

    http://www.narth.com/docs/whitehead.html

  • Posted By: rogerhall @ 10/31/2008 11:51:09 PM

    Good luck brother, and please continue to testify regardless of the outcome.

    My wife and I are offended that anyone would think that your marriage could somehow affect ours. IMHO, anyone who whines about the sanctity of marriage shows a real lack of commitment to their own.

    • Posted By: thedon @ 11/01/2008 12:01:23 AM

      rogerhall. Please humor me and let me into your strange logic of how my concern about the sanctity of marriage shows lack of commitment to my own marriage?

      • Posted By: rogerhall @ 11/01/2008 12:06:42 AM

        My marriage is sacred to me. Why would I ever let anything you say or do come between us?

        How could you let anything affect your marriage?

        If someone else's marriage affects your own - then you never really had the proper commitment in the first place, did you?

        • Posted By: thedon @ 11/01/2008 12:46:03 AM

          Ah. OK. I guess we should put this discussion to rest. You are reading things into what I wrote that are a giant leap. Please don't do that. What I am saying is that marriage is a man and woman. It would be like me saying that even though I am hispanic, I would like to be a Native American, and to have everyone else recognize me as that. It's that presumptive, preposterous, and arrogant. Yes, gay marriage doesn't affect my heterosexual marriage at all - only makes it stronger.

          • Posted By: rogerhall @ 11/01/2008 12:54:59 AM

            IMHO, it is like me being Hispanic, and you insisting that I claim to be a Native American instead.

            BTW, I didn't actually read what you wrote. I responded to the general argument regarding "the sanctity of marriage". *Divorce* is damaging to the sanctity of marriage. Not marriage, regardless of who is marrying.

            BTW, if marriage is sacred, and only sacred, then the government has no business sanctioning it in the first place. Clearly then, it isn't sacred. It is a legal arrangement, and should be available to everyone equally.

            • Posted By: thedon @ 11/01/2008 3:41:12 AM

              rogerhall. You speak of the sanctity of marriage - and really you are just referring to whether people behave well or not. That's NOTHING to do with foundational sanctity of marriage. Marriage is sanctified because God designed it and gave it to the world. But here we will probably come to the heart of the matter why we (and most other people on these postings) can never see eye-to-eye: different and opposite world-views. I know a God who has SPECIFICALLY revealed Himself through the Bible. You either have your own version of God, or no version at all. I don't know how you can trust your own version, any more than I would trust mine without the Bible. You trust your world-view just because it feels right, or you can "see" it? Yikes.

              The bottom line is, from God's mouth Himself, "The fear (knowledge) of God is the beginning of wisdom." As you can infer, if you don't start there then you ain't got much. I don't say any of this condescendingly to you or anyone else. I try to have God's heart for people who don't know Him. So my desire is that you would know your Maker, the one true God. As a song writer has said, "You're going to find out that He's the way, no matter which way you choose. But I pray you find out by His love for you."

              P.S. I know. Abuse forthcoming from those offended that I had the gall to suggest that there IS universal truth . . .

              P.S.S. Think about it. And go to www.juststopandthink.com

              • Posted By: rogerhall @ 11/01/2008 12:04:01 PM

                Re: juststopandthink.com

                Nice rock intro. Isn???t it funny how Christian producers love 12-string guitars?

                The one actor in this fifteen minute movie is talking about love. He explains the love God had to punish his own son instead of punishing the rest of us for our shortcomings, because he loves us so much he would rather have a fair and just opportunity to be with us rather than punish us.

                "When I look at myself I know I???ve broken a lot of these commands"

                The speaker continues to express his own love for nature and existence, but makes a special point of how he loves his daughters. The epiphany he has is to think about making the same sacrifice God did.

                "Think about the person you love the most in this world being nailed to a cross."

                It is powerful to think of your own child being crucified. Every (normal) parent would figuratively die (if not literally).

                However, the script still misses the reason someone's child would be nailed to the cross: to forgive those who are imperfect, and to offer love to those who may yet reject it.

                "Jesus said if you really knew me, you would obey my commands."

                Mark 12:28-31
                And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all?
                And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
                And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.
                And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. THERE IS NONE OTHER COMMANDMENT GREATER THAN THESE.

                (Emphasis mine. And Jesus???.)

              • Posted By: rogerhall @ 11/01/2008 9:56:24 AM

                Actually, I am talking about the sanctity of each *individual* marriage, while you seem to think there is some Universal Marriage to which we all belong. I am also talking about a secular sanctity; and it has nothing to do with a lack of understanding of God.

                It is also in respect to Caesar, who decrees that an establishment of religion is inappropriate. There is no *sacred* marriage in the public square. *Sacred* things happen in church, not the courthouse.

                As for *sacred* sources, and without anymore condescension myself than you have shown, I suggest that you grab a modern invention called a ???topical index???, which is a handy tool that reorganizes the bible by topic. Count and compare the number of verses which say *anything* about ???homosexuality???, ???perversion???, and ???sodomy??? (and any other topic you think relevant) with the number of verses which specifically talk about ???love??? (and just those that SPECIFICALLY talk about love).

                Allow me to preview what you will find: there are a handful of verses about the former (which are mostly located in the Old Testament). There are reams of verses in the New Testament about loving, and dontcha know, not a single one of them says love is based on fear.

                Incidentally, unless/until we have technology available to forcefully remap a person???s brain, everyone has always had their own version of everything, including God. That???s the way people work. To suggest that any two people interpret either scripture or life in the same fashion is wishful thinking. To suggest that it is the other person???s interpretation that is wrong is ??? unwise.

                But in either case, you are correct that it all boils down to good behavior.

                What else is there? Intentions?

      • Posted By: rogerhall @ 11/01/2008 12:10:20 AM

        Marriage isn't a commitment to the planet or the community or the church or an ideal.

        It's a commitment to another. No one can break the bond but you.

        Everything is is fascism.

        • Posted By: rogerhall @ 11/01/2008 12:11:03 AM

          Everything *else* is fascism.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse