SPONSORED BY:

Going After Bin Laden

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

What happened after that?
The afternoon of Dec. 11, 2001, elements of both Ali and his subordinate warlord attacked hilltop 2685, the strongpoint for Al Qaeda's defenses where we believe bin Laden was held up. They overran Al Qaeda up there and when it was over that evening the subordinate was up there, not Ali. That night, negotiations began with an Al Qaeda lieutenant about surrendering. When my guys showed up the next morning, they learned that the mujahedin were not going to move forward or let us move forward because they had told Al Qaeda that they would negotiate for a ceasefire and surrender. [The ceasefire] basically allowed, if not bin Laden himself, certainly his fighters the ability to reload and reposition.

When did you catch up with him again?
On Dec. 14, we heard a real-time voice from bin Laden. He apologized to his fighters for getting them into this mess and allowed them to surrender. The next day, our guys up in the mountains spotted roughly 50 Al Qaeda fighters moving into a cave. The mujahedin allies up there said they spotted a tall man in a camouflage jacket. We put two and two together. There were five cave openings in the mountain they went into, and we struck all openings for about two and a half hours.

Months later, a group of American and Canadian forces returned to Afghanistan to figure out what happened to bin Laden. What did they find?
That was later in July of 2002. A team of the 101st Airborne, some Canadian engineers and a U.S. forensic team moved in the mountains with some mujahedin. They went to specific locations that were targeted from the air and tried to dig through the rubble to do DNA sampling on the various bodies. They went to the location where we bombed for two and a half hours, but the terrain is so daunting that it was hard to bring heavy equipment or enough explosives to open those caves. They made an attempt but had to give up and never entered the caves in question. What they did do was move around the battlefield to all the [Al Qaeda] graves. They removed the remains, took DNA samplings, reburied them and departed. They found no evidence that he was buried there.

What do you think happened to him?
I think after the night of the 11th he started to see the writing on the wall, and his own personal survival became more important than the jihad. We think he started moving to the east toward the main valley that goes into Pakistan. At some point, we're pretty sure he was wounded through bomb shrapnel in his shoulder, which has been discussed in custodial interviews at Guantánamo Bay by other fighters that were at Tora Bora. We think he received medical attention at a local village and we're pretty sure he was put into a vehicle and moved south across the border into Pakistan somewhere between the 17th and 19th of December 2001.

How do you think the world would have been different if your team had killed him?
I personally think that had we gotten bin Laden, early widespread extremist ideology would not have taken root as it has. The fact that he was able to dodge the only remaining superpower in the world and get out of there gave him a lot of credence and increased his ability to motivate any fence sitters that might want to support him. It was a significant loss that we didn't get him.

What would happen if the United States takes him out now?
I think it could potentially stop Al Qaeda Central. I think it will stop any desires to plan and execute another 9/11. I don't think it will end terrorism by Islamic extremists.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: jbz7879 @ 02/26/2009 12:31:12 PM

    this is a very subjective analysis hardly any objective evidence if he was even there in tora bora -looks like a totally misconceived misadventure with personal speculations about what was happenning
    rather a mishap asv the entire afghan -pak-iraq operation has been with trillions wasted to create a bankrupt economy -

  • Posted By: Combat Goldfish @ 11/05/2008 3:18:09 PM

    You don't have to convince someone to go to war if they've already swore and signed the dotted line. More troops may or may not work, however, we're not really doing anything to speed up the processes of bringing this part of history to an end.

  • Posted By: Trooper101st @ 11/03/2008 8:17:53 AM

    Do not understand why Army Rangers, or other QRF's from XVIII Airborne Corps were not rushed to the battlefield. Some units are supposed to be in the air within 18 hours. Why weren't they used? Operation Anaconda did not achieve its objectives, LZ's were hot with AQ/T-ban, they had the high ground, our intel was bad. There is a need for light, small UAV's at platoon and even sqaud level. It would be nice to know wats on the other side of the ridge, and it would help prevent ambush. Thank God for the Carl Gustav, also known as RAAWS, it was critical in taking out bunkers and killing hadji's in caves. The DoD should concentrate on this war, not on one that may never happen. Some parts of the FCS are good for today, the rest should be put on the back burner. We will be fighting these kinds of battles for the next 10 yrs.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now