Long Live U.S. Imperialism

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: rube @ 11/01/2008 9:41:10 PM

    Tell me what Imperalist regime has worked? through in the past 6 years of American imperalism too!
    Even the so called great reagan/GOP cold war victory was a farce!

    Neo- conservatism is a dismal failure, all the proof is in your house equity, your bank accounts, your paycheck, it???s on Wallstreet, its on the shelves of your supermarket, its on the corner gas station, its in the loss of jobs and homes
    and on the streets and deserts of Iraq and Afghanistan.!

    It???s in the defiance of Pakistan, Russia, Venezuela and now China!

    We all know conservatives want to plug in the same theology the same ideology from yet another legislator that represents the betrayal, the greed and the duplicity that has buried us to this point!

    War are won or lost by the rightness and decency of the participants!
    As our nations history goes we have never lost a war when we were right but now we have lost wars because we were ideologically wrong! It???s not just about strength its about wisdom and justice.
    American qualities that have been inactive during the past seven plus years of conservative politics!
    American ideals that the GOP and neoconservatives have never able to grasp!


  • Posted By: Mossad @ 11/01/2008 11:54:27 AM

    What an amazing rationalization for endless war and the vastly excessive militarization of our country. It's time we stop invading and destroying other countries, while at the same time destroying our own economy. If you think the credit crisis is bad, wait till the chickens come home to roost on out ten-trillion dollar national debt and ballooning. It's only a matter of time before our aggressive worldwide imperialism backfires on us and causes us intense pain and loss. Sadly, like all good "liberal" news outlets, Newsweek views U.S. imperialism and militarism as some sort of virtue. What goes around, comes around. And we won't like it one little bit.

    • Posted By: Vypurr @ 11/01/2008 12:53:16 PM

      When we no longer defend ourselves against terrorism (as Clinton didn't) and simply toss UN resolutions in the trash as we will in Iran, (and why not, they were worthless with Iraq) who do you think will defend you against aggression? Surely you want Obama to sit on his ass as Clinton did and do nothing. Iran have its way regarding nukes, and if Russia sees fit to do so, it will park warheads in Venezuela and elsewhere. Or are you so very foolish to think nations like these will automatically "play nice" just because Obama is president? Hamas, Iran, Russia... they all want to see a young, inexperinced pacisfist as president, and it isn't because they want to "make nice."

      Obama's slick orator skills might get him elected, but they won't work with Iran and Russia.

      • Posted By: Nowforsomemoretruth @ 11/01/2008 7:15:34 PM

        Cuba, Vietnam. Laos, Cambodia, Iran, Nicaragua, Somalia, Iraq. Let our friends, allies and the innocents die, by the millions if necessary. Just so long as they are not Americans. We are the Democratic Party, and for 50 years, from the Bay of Pigs to the Basra Highway and beyond, we have never met a fight we could not pressure our government to run away from, or friends and allies we could not abandon. It's the story of our generation. Only the French are more defeatist than we, but together America, we can change that and become number one. And its change we can believe in. Come on America, and vote Democrat. Together, we can re-live that pride we haven't felt since the 1970's. If we just blindly pull together, we really can make this like it is Jimmy Carter's lost second term. Yes we can!

    • Posted By: Nowforsomemoretruth @ 11/01/2008 12:48:45 PM

      What do you really know about Obama's economic philosophy? Since he has never run a town, state or business, he has no record to look at. Oh, he has made lots of promises, but given that he broke his promise to be limited to public campaign funds, you cant put much faith in that, and there will be no means to keep those promises anyway.

      But you do know that Obama, along with his democratic buddies in Congress, personally and professionally advocated for a residential housing policy favoring forced sub-prime lending, which subsequently resulted in massive defaults and foreclosures, leading to your loss of significant equity value in your home, to the point that it destabilized your banks, which panicked the stock market, which wiped out your savings.

      Look and listen to Obama for yourself. Obama in this video, addressing his community activist work and his work representing ACORN in litigation against the banks and relating to the Community Reinvestment Act, and addressing the failure of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as those actions relate to the destruction of our economy by causing the current real estate and subsequent financial crisis, states that, and I quote:

      "Subprime lending started out as a good idea, helping Americans buy homes who previously could not afford to. Financial institutions created new financial instruments that could securitize these loans, slice them into finer and finer risk categories, and spread them out among investors and around the country, as well as around the world. In theory, this should have allowed mortgage lending to be less risky, and more diversified."

      Acknowledging the catastrophe, but as apologist for the Democrats, Obama then offers this justification.

      "The original idea was a good one, which was, lets see if we can distribute risk more broadly, and make it easier to provide loans to people who otherwise might not be able to get one."

      Yah, great idea. Economically unsound, but embraced by Obama. Listen for yourself. You cannot dispute the mans on words recorded live:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related

      Below is a link to C-SPAN video clips of the Congressional hearings at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix Fannie and Freddie. See for yourself who said what.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 11/01/2008 7:07:05 PM

    Sarah palin when asked about becoming vp responded

    "As for that VP talk all the time, I tell you, I still can't answer that question until somebody answers for me, 'what is it exactly that the VP does every day......"

    After she had been the nominee for around 2 months she was asked again and this time said

    [T]hey???re in charge of the U.S. Senate so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes that will make life better for Brandon and his family and his classroom.

    WRONG THE VP IS THERE TO STEP IN IF SOMTHING HAPPENS TO THE PRESIDENT ONLY THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH POLICY AND THEY DONT RUN THE SENATE!!
    If she doenst know what the vice pres or presidant does why would we give her the job

    Mccain has around a 40 percent chance because of his age in not being able to

    complete his term picking palin was about as smart as picking any other mrs Alaska contestant.

    Its not just that we disagree with her answers in alot of cases she doesnt understand basic questions
    like what is the bush doctrine, or what do you read.
    These are not gotcha questions!!!
    One of advisors recently said not only was she unqualified but said mccain picked her after 1 interview of about a hour
    and that even at mcdonalds you get 3 interviews.
    Members of her own campaign called her a diva and a whack job.
    They would know better then anyone else right now.

    So mccain gambled and he lost big. He ended up with a girl that cant answer questions that most of the people reading this can answer.
    at the same time mccain could never read this blog because he cant use a computer at all.
    I mean his wife has 100 million dollars get him classes or something.

    Am i crazy or do we want a computer literate president and a vp who can answer a least basic questions.
    If you read the rest of the articles on this site you would think the world is about to end
    So if thats the case these are the last 2 people you want running anything.
    let send them packing.

    ELECT OBAMA BIDEN NOW

  • Posted By: Holly Garfield @ 11/01/2008 4:37:58 PM

    Poster visitor repeatedly comments 'Comment: BS, BS, and more BS...........' with no other explanation. Would poster 'visitor' please explain your position as to why you make this comment repeatedly?

    Fundamental rule of disagreements: when person A and person B have a disagreement then person A is right about half of the time. Exception 1: If someone disagrees with me then I am always right. Exception 2: anyone who agrees with me is always right on the issue in agreement. No other exceptions.

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 11/01/2008 3:02:35 PM

    FUN QUOTES FROM PALIN
    I got all of these quotes off of google quotes
    You really couldn't make up this kind of stuff up if you wanted to
    This all part of the reason why so many important republicans have been saying she
    is a joke

    When asked about her foreign policy experience she said
    "As Putin rears his head," she said, referring to Russian prime Minister Vladimir Putin, "and comes into the airspace of the United States of America, where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border."
    TELLING THE TRUTH FOR A CHANGE SHE HAD THIS TO SAY ABOUT HER RUN FOR VP
    "It's time that normal Joe Six-Pack American is finally represented in the position of vice-presidency"
    WHEN ASKED TO NAME ONE SUPREME COURT DECISION AND NOT BEING ABLE TO SHE CAME UP WITH THIS ANSWER
    "I'm in that sense a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas"
    when asked again to name one decision she responded
    "Well, let's see. There's -- of course -- in the great history of America rulings there have been rulings"
    When asked about being a redneck she said
    "Someone called me a `redneck woman' once. You know what I said back? `Thank-you very much.'"
    when asked what promises she might not be able to keep
    "How long have I been at this, like five weeks? So there hasn't been a whole lot that I've promised, except to do what is right..."

    Talking to dobson about prayer she said
    "It is that intercession that is so needed and so greatly appreciated," Palin told Dobson. "And I can feel it too, Dr. Dobson. I can feel the power of prayer, and that strength that is provided through our prayer warriors across this nation."

    When asked about being a environmentalist she originally said
    "I'm not an Al Gore, doom-and-gloom environmentalist blaming the changes in our climate on human activity."
    when asked again later if she thought people had a impact on global warming
    "Show me where I have ever said that there's absolute proof that nothing that man has ever conducted or engaged in has had any effect or no effect on climate change,"
    asked about voting she said
    "I truly believe that the wisdom of the people will be rebuilt on [Election Day]. As they enter that voting booth, they will understand the stark contrast between the two tickets,"
    when asked how mccain did at his first debate
    "I just thought he was great, because the American people are angry, and John McCain is angry, too
    when asked about tina feys imitation of her she said
    "I watched it with the volume all the way down," Palin said. "I thought it was hilarious."

    IS SHE KIDDING IS THIS WHOLE THING A JOKE
    IS IT REALLY POSSIBLE SOMEONE COULD BE THIS CLUELESS
    SOMEONE THAT THINKS THEY COULD RUN THE COUTRY NOW LESS
    VOTE OBAMA BIDEN NOW AND SEND HER BACK TO ALASKA

  • Posted By: wendydk @ 11/01/2008 1:03:30 PM

    You think you know Sarah Palin and John McCain? Think again.

    SARAH PALIN

    Palin appointed friends and donors to key posts in Alaska, records show

    http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-palinrecords24-2008oct24,0,6683728.story

    Sarah Palin Linked to Second WITCH HUNTER

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/sarah-palin-linked-to-sec_b_137532.html

    Palin faces new ethics complaint over kids travel

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081030/ap_on_el_ge/palin_ethics_complaint_5;_ylt=AiD7P6Fxkk.LKh67DdqdA1Bh24cA

    Palins un-American activities

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/10/07/palins_unamerican/index.html

    Palin And The Alaska Independence Party

    http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/the_alaska_independence_party.php

    Alaskan Independence Party chairwoman Lynette Clark talks about why she doesnt identify herself as an American, and about her kindred spirit Sarah Palin.

    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/09/10/alaska_secession/index.html

    The pastor who clashed with Palin

    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/09/15/bess/index.html

    Troopergate Report Concludes Palin Abused Power, Full 263 Page report here

    http://download2.legis.state.ak.us/DOWNLOAD.pdf

    Mad Dog Palin: The full Story

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/23318320/mad_dog_palin

    JOHN MCCAIN

    Make-Believe Maverick

    http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain

    The Dark Side of John McCain

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/22/johnmccain.uselections2008

    The funniest part of all of this to me is that Palin will return to Alaska with her tail between her legs. She might try for a run in 2012, but Guiliani and Romney and whomever else vies for the Republican nomination will absolutely tear her apart. I can???t wait to see it.

    Report Abuse
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 11/01/2008 11:23:13 AM

    Here is the most comical quote from the above article; "According to everyone from Hamas to Maureen Dowd of The New York Times, the American Empire is over." Wow, there are a couple of unbiased sources! Hamas, a known terrorist organization, and Maureen Dowd, the most left-wing hack in all of American journalism!

    How can anyone who claims to be a professional cite these two as "sources" for anything, when they are both so obviously biased? Why not use Charles Manson as a "source" for his opinion on mass-murder?

    Newsweak gets more bizzare with each passing day.

    • Posted By: Nowforsomemoretruth @ 11/01/2008 12:49:23 PM

      Cuba, Vietnam. Laos, Cambodia, Iran, Nicaragua, Somalia, Iraq. Let our friends, allies and the innocents die, by the millions if necessary. Just so long as they are not Americans. We are the Democratic Party, and for 50 years, from the Bay of Pigs to the Basra Highway and beyond, we have never met a fight we could not pressure our government to run away from, or friends and allies we could not abandon. It's the story of our generation. Only the French are more defeatist than we, but together America, we can change that and become number one. And its change we can believe in. Come on America, and vote Democrat. Together, we can re-live that pride we haven't felt since the 1970's. If we just blindly pull together, we really can make this like it is Jimmy Carter's lost second term. Yes we can!

  • Posted By: Tea6 @ 11/01/2008 12:45:31 PM

    For the last 8 years we have had the Financial-Consulting-Free-Trade complex doing everything they can to hollow out Middle America. They did this knowing that large Asian and German export surpluses would have to be reinvested and flow through Wall Street. Good for the Wall Street money crowd, good for the McKinsey type consultants and bad for the rest of the USA. It is time to take our country back. Stop currency manipulation, end non-trade barriers and renegotiate one way trade agreements. Cheaper wages are probably the smallest cause of our current account deficit. We have had people with ideological free-trade blinders on making trade agreements with mercantilist governments and being taken to the cleaners every time. We need to separate foreign policy initiatives from trade and end the practice of giving one-way preferences to countries that agree to do some unrelated task for the US State Department.

  • Posted By: audie @ 10/31/2008 7:35:42 PM

    As someone who works often in hospitals and imaging centers, I am endlessly amazed at how our nation is willing to buy billion dollar weapons when there's a shortage of health care workers, at least 1/4 of the nation has no health insurance, our health care is rated 16th in the world (Germany is #1), and get this--yes, you are going to die, probably from a disease process, and the odds of your needing good health care vis a vis the military "protection" is about 10,000 to 1. Nature is sly--most do not realize this cruel trick until its too late, so we go on wasting our precious resources for military bragging rights. Note also our vaulted military's effectiveness is Irag. What a nutty country, soon to be a much poorer country albeit with the best weapons.

    • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 10/31/2008 10:03:16 PM

      Please go back to Germany, and don't let the door hit you on your a** on the way out,,,

      • Posted By: rexymeteorite @ 11/01/2008 4:17:18 AM

        Please go back to whatever cesspool you crawled out of, and dont come back.

        • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 11/01/2008 11:03:11 AM

          And you go with him to Germany, schnell, Herr Douchebag

  • Posted By: TZAZ @ 10/31/2008 6:21:12 PM

    The author obviously doe's not understand the definition of Imperial. Protecting your national interest in the world without territorial expansion is hardly imperialism. The author would do well in reading about Rome or Austria or Great Britain.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/01/2008 9:00:03 AM

      The Imperialsim argument is directed mainly at the Bush Presidency, and is innacurate, but a nice insult. Bush has disregarded treaties and engaged in behaviors not best suited to our long term interest.
      Unilaterally withdrawing from the world would be an equal and opposite stupid.
      We should, however, closely look at what we are doing with what, where and for whom, at what cost to us. We used to do this better. We used to have allies that we would consult with and a President that could think about consequences. Smart is looking better all of the time.

      • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 11/01/2008 11:02:20 AM

        TZAZ is right, and you are dead wrong. Newsweak throws around the word 'imperialism' in an inflammatory and knowingly incorrect way. But that is no surprise, as NW is run by left-wing zealots like yourself, to whom the truth clearly doesn't matter.

    • Posted By: visitor @ 11/01/2008 8:22:49 AM

      BS, BS, and more BS...........

    • Posted By: visitor @ 11/01/2008 8:19:55 AM

      BS, BS, and more BS...........

  • Posted By: monger @ 10/31/2008 7:27:24 PM

    Interesting thesis. Cop, actually the word police, stems from the Greek word 'politeia' meaning, state, administration, government. In other languages, the literal translation of their word into English is "keeper of order". It just might be that a Carter'esque America can serve the world well in keeping order. But I have my doubts that a neocon view of governing the world is doable, or desireable.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/01/2008 9:13:25 AM

      The Neo Cons have hurt us horribly. I am not however ready to just abandon in whole our military. Major changes need to be made, and burden sharing must replace unilateralism.
      I can see a 25% cut in defense spending and we still be the worlds top power, by orders of magnitude.
      If we mixed in a little diplomacy into the cake, and had others bring ingredients, we could get even more done cheaper. Right now, some facets of our defense, such as our Air Force's total lack of competence in handling and maintaining the nuclear component are a shadow of their former selves.
      We do need Strategic Air Command reformed and re activated.
      We had a silo fire that went undetected for 5 days because they thought it was a "wiring problem" That is totally unacceptable.
      It shows that the current Administration has been inept at maintaining the system, while it wrote huge checks to contractors, who by and large made off well and did not do the work. Knocking those mercenaries and contractors off the teat would pay for a lot of social programs and not hurt our nations defenses one bit.

      • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 11/01/2008 10:59:58 AM

        Here is a quiz for you, Mr. Leftie -
        What is the definition of Neo-Con?
        Can you tell me one factual thing about Halliburton?

        Get a grip. Your hysteria is comical.

  • Posted By: TZAZ @ 10/31/2008 10:07:19 PM

    I wish that there was some way to ship all you half assed American haters to other countries so you can be happy. Freedom has a price and it is not always cheap, cry babies.

    • Posted By: visitor @ 11/01/2008 8:21:08 AM

      BS, BS, and more BS...........

      • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 11/01/2008 10:58:07 AM

        And let's make this America-hater (visitor) the first we ship off...

    • Posted By: jimbo3800 @ 11/01/2008 10:57:11 AM

      Well said and right on the money...

    • Posted By: Holly Garfield @ 11/01/2008 7:22:55 AM

      I'm with you, TZAZ, on shipping the American haters off to another country. The trouble is that if we do that then we wouldn't be a free country anymore. So part of the price of freedom is that we have to put up with them.

      • Posted By: visitor @ 11/01/2008 8:20:54 AM

        BS, BS, and more BS...........

  • Posted By: Sultan Ahmed @ 11/01/2008 10:20:17 AM

    This is fact of the day,
    should admitt with open heart,
    United States is a greatest democracy in the world,
    it is a leading country and many countries trying to follow its sydtem,
    according to my considered opinion,America is a strongest sign of imperialism.


    But i am very afraid when I see that
    all people of the whole world see America and its policies with hate
    on the contrary,all the dictators,specially millitary dictators ,
    or other persons ,take over the power by force ,or through other means,
    loves with America and can not run without American shelter.


    On the American advice,
    policies are made,
    which confronted with popular will,
    and it is open secret that,
    dictators has been colecting money with both hands,
    but poor people of the rich governments has always been dprived
    of their legitimate fundamental rights,
    it mean, as i have come to the conclusion that,
    American state department care no poor people,
    it has concern with the rulers,
    who may carried out their policies,
    which are specially dinention goes not in favour of poor people,
    these are based on rulers 's benefits.


    Pages of the history are witness,
    united States, gave a unique support to Iranian king,
    disregarding the all Iranian people,
    and there revolution which put the American influence rooted out.


    The same policies has been adopted in regard to Pakistan,
    every dictator has been beloved of the United States,
    perhaps, here in Pakistan , blood or bloodless revolution is standing a side,
    and waiting the time.


    The world's greatest democracy The United States of America,
    should honoure democracy in the small countries,
    its policies must be beneficial for poor people not for dictators,
    because dictators,at last have to go,
    but people remained forever.





  • Posted By: smithjeffr @ 11/01/2008 9:18:51 AM

    Finally someone who gets it. The world, just like any city, needs a cop to maintain order. Like it or not, the US is that cop. There is no other country in the world with the might to take on the role. There may be a lot of consternation around the world of the US presence and it taking on this role, but I do not think that the other governments of the world want the US to pull out. They may not say it, but the other countries of the world appreciate the stability that the US brings by taking on this role.

    If the seventh fleet were to pull out of the far east it would not be long before the entire region destabilized. You would see China moving into Taiwan, which would make the Japanese very nervous. The Japanese would start building up there military in response and South Korea would start getting nervous. It would not be long before a minor incident caused that entire part of the world to erupt.

    Until there is someone else who can take on the role, we are stuck with it.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/01/2008 9:51:58 AM

      Yes, but the Cop has to have clean hands too. That has been why people are tossing around words like hegemon, empire, and worse at us.
      If my party fails to step up to it's responsibilities, and fails to engage in diplomacy, and fails to manage the budget, resources and people, we too will be removed from power.
      We should not abandon our role in the world, but should do it with consensus and collaboration.
      We also need to realize exactly how much <Expletive> kicking power we really have. We can make reasonable adjustments down in some areas, and reasonable adjustments up in others, like say, unmanned aerial vehicles, that can produce staggering cost savings, and force multiplication.
      We hardly need to maintain our surrent cost structure to maintain our force projection.

      • Posted By: smithjeffr @ 11/01/2008 10:19:03 AM

        Our current military is severely stretched right now. Many Navy ships are sailing without a full complement of personnel. We have been investing in force multiplying technologies for some time now, but they only go so far when it comes to reducing the need for traditional military. I agree that UAVs are a great technology and can reduce the need for manned aircraft in many situations. They have even been used to reduce the demand for extremely limited satelite intel assets. However, I am not sure that we can achieve the level of cuts that have been proposed (25%) by some. Unfortunately we are faced with many aging assets in our military inventory. These need to be replaced in order to maintain our needed force structure and capabilities. This is not an appropriate forum to go into specifics, but one well known example is the aerial refuling tankers that need to be replaced. Many of the existing aircraft are over 40 years old and under normal circumstances would not be allowed to fly. Exceptions have been made to keep them in the air because of the need.

        Our military has had major problems recruiting in recent years and as a result the services are below their planned strengths. This has been made apparent by the extended tours and stop loss orders, preventing some military personnel from retiring, that our military has been forced to endure. Cutting funding will only make this problem worse. The stories of soldiers not having body armor and riding in vehicles that do not have adequate armor has hurt recruitment. These conditions have been caused by budget cuts and, in the case of the inadequate armor, cost cutting decisions that have been made. We also need to start paying the lower ranks in our military a better wage. It is very sad when we have military families in this country that qualify for food stamps. We need to make sure that our military is one where people want to serve or we are in for some very tough times. I do not think anyone wants to see a return of the draft.

        Our military has been learning how to do more with less, I am just not sure how much less they can take.

  • Posted By: expatincebu @ 10/31/2008 7:23:06 PM

    Another sad pathetic article cheer leading America's militaristic society and championing American Fascism.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/01/2008 10:05:46 AM

      I don't know that it goes that far. I do however get the sentiment.
      If Cheney, Rice, Rumsfield, Tenet, Yoo, and other John Doe's and Jane Doe's as discovered, were hauled off before an international tribunal and handled like Nuremburg, I would not bat an eye.
      The last 8 years can be repudiated soundly on many fronts, but I would not wish to be tared throughout history for this Presidency. Nor am I ready to unilaterally disarm. I am not however, ready at all to wave the gun or the bloody shirt to get things done.
      I sure miss the PI bro.

  • Posted By: fuzzytruthseker @ 11/01/2008 9:55:29 AM

    It is incredible how much non-sequitur is contained in this opinion piece. From the unsubstantiated premise that " The problem with East Asia ... is that none of its countries trust each other", the author draws the conclusion that " on balance, the world would still be a much more dangerous place without America around". How the conclusion follows from a premise that is wrong in the first place, one wonders.

    Nobody -- and certainly not Fareed Zakaria -- is talking of "a world without America around". Fair enough, "the post-America world" was an unfortunate turn of phrase for Zakaria's book, but it's 'toxicity' is less than one-thousandth that of that other much-talked about study of 'grand strategy' of more than a decade ago, Fukuyama's "The End of History and the Last Man".

    Ken Ichi Omae is the one who has got it right -- we are now in a stage of history where the players that matter in 'grand strategy' are no longer nation-states but 'region-states'. The contours of a few emerging region-states have already more or less taken shape: Japan-India-South Korea will likely form one such region-state. Europe and North Africa will be a second region-state. In the Eurasian heartland, there wil continue, for quite some time to come, to be major tensions as Turkey, Iran and Pakistan form an alliance to bring under their influence by drawing away from Russian influence the key energy-resource- rich Central Asian states of Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan, or at least temper Russian domination of these nation-states. Meanwhile, the Middle-East proper will also continue for long years to come to be a variable-geometry region-state seeking to define itself and to decide alongside which nexus in this emerging multi-polar world it wishes to align itself in order to best serve its long-term interests. My hunch is that, for having tried to play smart-Alec with the Muslim world for so long by trying to establsih a 'Southern Caliphate' to counter the 'Northern Caliphate' of the Ottoman empire about a century ago, and having tried to use Muslim yearning for an illusionary 'golden age of Islam' to uproot its unsuspecting Mujahiddeens to fling them in the face of "Godless communism'' after the Soviets invaded Afghanistan in 1979, 'the West" will, to its total discomfiture, find its strategy backfire on it, with the Middle-East aligning itself with the Turkey/Iran and at least part of the Central Asian region-state. America will then have the uncontested hegemony (leadership, as the author reminds us) of the Western Hemisphere region-state.

    This, to me is the more likely scenario to the one already touted about a year ago concerning an Asian NATO to counterbalance the transatlantic NATO. However, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation is far from defunct; and NATO itself may yet, post-Bush, be brought back from its slide into terminal obsolescence.

  • Posted By: jduncan3321 @ 11/01/2008 8:49:47 AM

    Promising change is easy. Believing in change is naive. Delivering change is hard.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/01/2008 9:53:25 AM

      Change has always occured. Believe in it.
      Otherwise, a nice ditty.

  • Posted By: toolkien @ 11/01/2008 9:13:46 AM

    Wow.

    When Bush is the "cop" he's McHitler, and the Dems/Left use it as political baggage against him. Spending all this money that could be going for medical care for kiddies, etc etc.

    But now that the Dems are on the doorstep of the Presidency and a Super Majority, "the world STILL needs a cop".

    Whether the hot spot is Iraq or Kosovo or pretty much all of Africa, the US DOESN'T NEED to be the world's "cop". The world have been tearing itself apart for millenia, all we do by stepping in is make ourselves a ready made enemy in perpetuity (unless of course we actually erase one side in these century long death struggles - but that's genocide the last time I checked).

    I have said for the better part of a decade that there is little REAL difference between the two parties. The Dems still rattle the sabres and the Repubs pass the likes of Medicare Part D. Abortion, guns, and God OR Darwin are all that pretty much separate the two. And it is THOSE questions which devide people as if the rest weren't effectively the same. As it stands abortion ain't going anywhere, and people will have access to guns one way or another. So perhaps we should REALLY be worrying about spending hundreds of BILLIONS being the world's "cop" and Nation Building and our domestic woes of a $54 TRILLION accrual basis national debt, crumbling infrastructure, and fast disappearing individual rights.

    The time for 1984-ish rhetoric in this two party system needs to stop. We are in the brink of collapse, we have little to offer the Hottentots in their eternal struggle against the Tse-Tse's. The days of feel-goodism and State interventionism MUST come to a close. We are de facto bankrupt as a nation. We are a proverbial Red Giant, a Finance State that now produces very little. We have to STOP being the world's super bully and, yes, even when the Dems are in office.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/01/2008 9:32:15 AM

      As I remember just a few months ago, everyone in the world wanted us to jump into Darfur with both fet to stop a Genocide, while China pumped oil out, and other stood by and watched the slaughter.
      We don't have to be the world's cop, but there are times when we should get involved. In several places around the world, our presence is a good thing. In several others, it is a bad thing.
      While our military is very expensive, effective management of it and effective use of it can be done without impacting basic social services and infrastructure repair and development that are badly neded.
      As for our overall budget, one party could care less about health/roads etc. They are about profit and the top 1-2%

  • Posted By: thomasdj @ 11/01/2008 8:17:42 AM

    The oddsmaker comments on the strength of the Israeli lobby, and while it's somewhat tangential to this article, I have to agree. I am pro-Israel, but the Israeli lobby has reached a dangerous strength in the US. You can be pro-Israel and pro-Palestine at the same time, but the lobby won't allow for such even-handed thinking. The belligerent outcry against former President Carter -- particularly its assertion that Carter is antisemitic -- should be a cause for grave concern. We can have NO lobby, the Israeli lobby or otherwise, exercise the kind of control over US foreign policy that stifles open thought and debate. It is unfortunately true that making such comments requires incredible courage. A politician stands up to this lobby at his or her own peril.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/01/2008 9:25:05 AM

      I am pro-Israel too, but they have way overstepped their bounds in this Presidency. The Lawrence Franklin Espionage scandal has not been completely investigated, and full damage control implemented.
      The AIPAC/PNAC neo cons are all enemies of Democracy in America. Look up some of their membership rolls on the web, then look at the political campaigns, and you'll find all of them on one side of the street.

  • Posted By: nickesq @ 11/01/2008 1:42:36 AM

    Tzaz: Speaking of shipping people, I'd like to ship all the America spoilers off to some remote other world. This country has great potential but like a spoiled child often fails to live up to its potential and needs tough love. The world does not need a resource raider, turmoil creater, bully boy insisting on its own way, and control freak which is the role America has often played. Business should not rule America. We need to live up to our ideals most especially freedom and democracy.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/01/2008 9:22:18 AM

      Business has attempted to run things since colonial times. Only in our 43'd Presidency have they been so powerful. I feel that door closing, hard.
      I dislike certain aspects of the military industrial complex immensely.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse