A Darker Future For Us

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 11/01/2008 9:19:18 PM

    PALIN GOT PUNKED PART 2
    When Audette refers to Canadian singer Steph Carse as Canada's prime minister, Palin replies: "Well, he's doing fine and yeah, when you come into a position underestimated it gives you an opportunity to prove the pundits and the critics wrong. You work that much harder." Canada's prime minister is Stephen Harper.
    Palin praises Sarkozy throughout the call and also mentions his wife Carla Bruni, a model-turned-songwriter.
    "You know, I look forward to working with you and getting to meet you personally and your beautiful wife," Palin says. "Oh my goodness, you've added a lot of energy to your country with that beautiful family of yours."
    The Sarkozy impersonator tells Palin his wife is "so hot in bed" and then informs her that Bruni has written a song for her about Joe the Plumber entitled "De rouge a levre sur un cochon" ??? which translates as "Lipstick on a Pig."
    Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama derided his Republican challenger John McCain's call for change in Washington as "lipstick on a pig," days after Palin made a lipstick joke at the Republican convention. The McCain-Palin campaign then released an ad implying Obama was calling Palin a pig with that remark.
    The caller asks Palin if Joe the Plumber is her husband and adds: "We have the equivalent of Joe the Plumber in France. It's called Marcel, the guy with bread under his armpit."
    He also tells the Alaska governor that he loved the "documentary" made about her and referred to a pornographic film with a Palin look-alike made by Hustler founder Larry Flynt.
    She answers tentatively, "Ohh, good, thank you, yes."
    The callers then reveal the prank and identify themselves and their radio station.
    "Ohhh, have we been pranked?" Palin asks. "And what radio station

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 11/01/2008 9:18:58 PM

    PALIN GOT PUNKED PART 1
    Sarah Palin unwittingly took a prank call Saturday from a Canadian comedian posing as French President Nicolas Sarkozy and telling her she would make a good president someday.
    "Maybe in eight years," replies a laughing Palin.
    The Republican vice presidential nominee discusses politics, the perils of hunting with Vice President Dick Cheney, and Sarkozy's "beautiful wife," in a recording of the call released Saturday and set to air Monday on a Quebec radio station.
    Palin campaign spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt confirmed she had received the prank call.
    "Governor Palin was mildly amused to learn that she had joined the ranks of heads of state, including President Sarkozy and other celebrities, in being targeted by these pranksters. C'est la vie," she said.
    The call was made by a well-known Montreal comedy duo Marc-Antoine Audette and Sebastien Trudel. Known as the Masked Avengers, the two are notorious for prank calls to celebrities and heads of state.
    Audette, posing as Sarkozy, speaks in an exaggerated French accent and drops ample hints that the conversation is a joke. But Palin seemingly does not pick up on them.
    He tells Palin one of his favorite pastimes is hunting, also a passion of the 44-year-old Alaska governor.
    "I just love killing those animals. Mmm, mmm, take away life, that is so fun," the fake Sarkozy says.
    He proposes they go hunting together by helicopter, something he says he has never done.
    "Well, I think we could have a lot of fun together while we're getting work done," Palin counters. "We can kill two birds with one stone that way."
    The comedian jokes that they shouldn't bring Cheney along on the hunt, referring to the 2006 incident in which the vice-president shot and injured a friend while hunting quail.
    "I'll be a careful shot," responds Palin.
    Playing off the governor's much-mocked comment in an early television interview that she had insights into foreign policy because "you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska," the caller tells her: "You know we have a lot in common also, because ... from my house I can see Belgium."
    She replies: "Well, see, we're right next door to different countries that we all need to be working with, yes."

  • Posted By: Nowforsomemoretruth @ 11/01/2008 7:38:45 PM

    Perhaps, thanks mainly to the Democrats and people like Obama. Obama, along with his democratic buddies in Congress, personally and professionally advocated for a residential housing policy favoring forced sub-prime lending, which subsequently resulted in massive defaults and foreclosures, leading to your loss of significant equity value in your home, to the point that it destabilized your banks, which panicked the stock market, which wiped out your savings.

    Look and listen to Obama for yourself. Obama in this video, addressing his community activist work and his work representing ACORN in litigation against the banks and relating to the Community Reinvestment Act, and addressing the failure of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as those actions relate to the destruction of our economy by causing the current real estate and subsequent financial crisis, states that, and I quote:

    "Subprime lending started out as a good idea, helping Americans buy homes who previously could not afford to. Financial institutions created new financial instruments that could securitize these loans, slice them into finer and finer risk categories, and spread them out among investors and around the country, as well as around the world. In theory, this should have allowed mortgage lending to be less risky, and more diversified."

    Acknowledging the catastrophe, but as apologist for the Democrats, Obama then offers this justification.

    "The original idea was a good one, which was, lets see if we can distribute risk more broadly, and make it easier to provide loans to people who otherwise might not be able to get one."

    Yah, great idea. Economically unsound, but embraced by Obama. Listen for yourself. You cannot dispute the mans on words recorded live:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related

    Below is a link to C-SPAN video clips of the Congressional hearings at roughly the time McCains attempt at S.190. to fix Fannie and Freddie. See for yourself who said what.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

    • Posted By: max in fl @ 11/01/2008 8:50:08 PM

      Nowforsomemorestretchs

      The Statement
      In a campaign speech Wednesday, October 8, in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain questioned Democratic opponent Sen. Barack Obama's foresight on the role of the troubled subprime lending sector in the recent financial crisis. "As recently as September of last year, he said that subprime loans had been ??? quote ??? 'a good idea,' " McCain said.

      Get the facts!


      The Facts
      McCain is citing a statement Obama made during a September 17, 2007, speech in New York. While the words he quotes are technically accurate, McCain is taking them out of context from a statement that actually was criticizing abuses in the subprime sector.

      "Subprime lending started off as a good idea ??? helping Americans buy homes who couldn't previously afford them ??? ," Obama said. "But as certain lenders and brokers began to see how much money could be made, they began to lower their standards. Some appraisers began inflating their estimates to get the deals done. Some borrowers started claiming income they didn't have just to qualify for the loans and some were engaging in irresponsible speculation. But many borrowers were tricked into glossing over the fine print."

      The Verdict: Misleading.
      Obama did say subprime lending "started off as a good idea," but he was criticizing abuses in the sector. Based on his statements, he did not think they were a good idea last September, as McCain suggests
      http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/08/fact-check-did-obama-say-subprime-loans-a-good-idea/

      You stretched Baracks comment with this EXACT blog in eight headlines in newsweek... desparate.

    • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 11/01/2008 8:16:06 PM

      It is ridiculous for nowforsometruth or anyone else to claim that the Community Reinvestment Act caused the mortgage crisis.

      Bankers lent money to people with lower credit ratings for one reason and one reason only: because they expected to make money. Lenders believed that housing equity would continue to rise, and completely expected to make their money back on any foreclosed properties. Lenders were more than willing to float risky loans, encourage speculators, and accept inflated property appraisals, because they expected to MAKE MONEY.

      It was not borrowers who repackaged the mortgages by inventing credit default swaps, nor was it borrowers who were more than happy to slap inflated credit ratings on those same credit default swaps. Lenders did all those things, not the borrowers, and they did it to protect themselves and their investments, to insulate themselves and hide their greed and bad judgement.

      But make no mistake - lenders were more than happy to comply with the Community Reinvestment Act - nobody was coerced into lending a dime.

      It is convenient to blame minorities and people with less than stellar credit for the subprime mess - a typical 'blame the victim' mentality that absolves the real villians of any responsibility, a subtle argument that has racist and classist undertones.

      The American tax code is set up to reward homeowners. The Community Reinvestment Act was designed to help more people gain access to those rewards, a way for government to promote stability and the creation of assets for a group of people who otherwise would have had no opportunity to engage in the American Dream. The lenders subverted these goals by encouraging bad business practices and speculation, the real reasons for the sub-prime mortgage crisis.

      Lenders could have figured out ways to comply without using adjustable rate mortgages that were by their nature designed to work only on the flawed theory of ever-rising equity.

      Blaming the democrats and the Community Reinvestment Act for the behavior of greedy lenders and irresponsible credit agencies may be convenient, but it is a total misrepresentation of the truth.

  • Posted By: ObamaYesWeCan @ 11/01/2008 8:40:43 PM

    This moronic scumbag Samuel J. Wurzelbacher "Joe the Plumber" had his AZ driver license suspended

    http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/128323

    Wurzelbacher, who lived in Mesa in 2000 and had an Arizona driver's license, had his driver's license suspended by the Arizona Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Division on May 4, 2000, following a nonpayment of a court-imposed fine for civil traffic violations, according to court records.

    ...owes nearly $1,200 in back taxes, according to public records, still owes more than $700 to the Mesa court system.

    Records show he was cited for failure to stop at a red light and for failure to provide proof of insurance on Feb. 9, 2000, in a black Dodge truck at the intersection of Dobson and Baseline roads in Mesa.

    After failing to pay his original fine of $627.50 issued in March 2000, his license was suspended and the fine was handed over to a collection agency along with a 16 percent surcharge. The now-resident of Holland, Ohio, still owes $727.90 to the Mesa Municipal Court, according to court records.


    Hopefully the collection agency will break both of his legs so he'll never be able to walk nor work ever again. This typical Republican scumbag deserves it.

  • Posted By: wendydk @ 11/01/2008 6:56:19 PM

    What is most troubling in todays political climate is the promotion of hatred as a philosophy. The emergence of an ultraconservative dogma relies increasingly on the encouragement of mass hostility aimed at one group in particular - Americans with progressive political views. Liberals are spoken of with the kind of dripping contempt and virulent hostility that used to be associated with racism and sectarian religious strife. Liberals are viewed not fellow Americans citizens concerned with the future of their country, but as ideological enemies that need to be destroyed - and eaten if possible. This view is fundamentally anti-American.

    This right-wing sect manifests a complete lack of empathy toward other Americans whom it defines as its ideological enemies. Its core beliefs are absolutely impervious to reason and are unleashing ugly and violent impulses. What makes their zeal so dangerous for our country is their willingness to do serious damage to our precious American Democracy in their quest for absolute power.

    -The Assault on Reason (2007)

    SOUND FAMILIAR? IT DOES TO ME AND I AM SICK OF IT. IF YOU ARE TOO, VOTE OBAMA/BIDEN ???08

    • Posted By: Nowforsomemoretruth @ 11/01/2008 7:36:02 PM

      From this little diatribe, we learn much more about the writer than we do about people on the Right.

      • Posted By: wendydk @ 11/01/2008 7:54:43 PM

        Oh, and I must be getting under your skin for you to say a little something in your own words! Hooorah!

        • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 11/01/2008 8:37:09 PM

          It's ok, wendydk - nowforsometruth goes by the time-honored philosophy: "I cut-and-paste, therefore, I am." Leave him alone, and he will go home, wagging his tail behind him.

      • Posted By: wendydk @ 11/01/2008 7:53:29 PM

        Diatribe? It's a quote from a book, in case you missed that part!

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 11/01/2008 7:00:57 PM

    Sarah palin when asked about becoming vp responded

    "As for that VP talk all the time, I tell you, I still can't answer that question until somebody answers for me, 'what is it exactly that the VP does every day......"

    After she had been the nominee for around 2 months she was asked again and this time said

    [T]hey???re in charge of the U.S. Senate so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes that will make life better for Brandon and his family and his classroom.

    WRONG THE VP IS THERE TO STEP IN IF SOMTHING HAPPENS TO THE PRESIDENT ONLY THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH POLICY AND THEY DONT RUN THE SENATE!!
    If she doenst know what the vice pres or presidant does why would we give her the job

    Mccain has around a 40 percent chance because of his age in not being able to

    complete his term picking palin was about as smart as picking any other mrs Alaska contestant.

    Its not just that we disagree with her answers in alot of cases she doesnt understand basic questions
    like what is the bush doctrine, or what do you read.
    These are not gotcha questions!!!
    One of advisors recently said not only was she unqualified but said mccain picked her after 1 interview of about a hour
    and that even at mcdonalds you get 3 interviews.
    Members of her own campaign called her a diva and a whack job.
    They would know better then anyone else right now.

    So mccain gambled and he lost big. He ended up with a girl that cant answer questions that most of the people reading this can answer.
    at the same time mccain could never read this blog because he cant use a computer at all.
    I mean his wife has 100 million dollars get him classes or something.

    Am i crazy or do we want a computer literate president and a vp who can answer a least basic questions.
    If you read the rest of the articles on this site you would think the world is about to end
    So if thats the case these are the last 2 people you want running anything.
    let send them packing.

    ELECT OBAMA BIDEN NOW

  • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 11/01/2008 6:54:37 PM

    Mr. Samuleson makes a coherent argument for belt tightening, but he misses a few important points.

    "Economic growth has anchored our national self-esteem; slower growth suggests a grumpier and more contentious America." Grumpier and more contentious would seem to be a given - so many people are scared, angry and confused by the economic events of the last few months and so many fear the worst is yet to come.

    "Unfortunately, slower growth seems probable. " Slower growth isn't what people are afraid of - going backwards is what they fear. For many, too many, the economic "boom" of the last few years never materialized; even before gas prices hit the roof, a hefty percentage of people were struggling to make ends meet. Talk of new cars, vacations, big television sets - out of reach for many.

    Too many of our young people are 22 and already struggling under the burden of large college loans, too many of our elderly can't cover their medical costs, too many of our working poor are working 2 and 3 jobs and still falling behind.

    For these folks, there was never any affluence to lose.

    For too many, getting ahead won't be the concern: not drowning will be the concern.

  • Posted By: Nowforsomemoretruth @ 11/01/2008 6:45:34 PM

    First among those threats is Obama and the Democrats. In the exchange with "Joe the plumber" Obama unintentionally revealed that he really is as radical as his early political acquaintances, Davis, Ayers, Wright, etc., (gee, there sure seem to be a lot of them) and that he is into the failed economic policy of wealth redistribution. Now there is absolute proof. In 2001, Obama, the "community organizer" turned legislator, said in an interview:

    "And I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was that the civil rights movement became so court-focused, I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and organizing activities on the ground that are able to bring about the coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that,"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

    2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview.

    Obama's tax and spending plans alone would be bad enough, but add Reid and Pelosi to the mix, with the three of them controlling both houses of Congress and the executive branch without any effective restraint, and you have something that should causes concern even among moderate Democrats.
    See Wall Street Journal: A Liberal Supermajority:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html

    Indeed, some democrats are publically saying as much. See Barney Franks comments on the news, including face the nation last week, stating essentially that Democrats in Congress intend to greatly raise taxes and go on a spending spree.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1Mazjm_A5k

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGnSAlqjoU

    See http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/23617.html

    Obama's ill-conceived programs will require him to tax, and his health care plan alone is a substantial hidden tax on all business, large an small. In reality, it does not really matter who he taxes, those taxes are going to be passed through the economy. He has to tax, because it is they only way he can pay for his massive social engineering experiments. Any first year economics student knows that taxation is a tool used to contract an economy experiencing inflation, because it reduces demand by reducing the amount of money individuals and businesses have to spend. It is contractionary, which is exactly what you do not want to do when the problem is that the economy is contracting already into recession. Like Hoover and FDR, Obama's plans will only make it worse for longer.

    See e.g. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/03/opinion/main4499465.shtml
    And
    http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx


    The democrats failed social engineering policies are what brought us to ruin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related
    Even Bill Clinton says so. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsynspIqAoE
    Obama and a supermajority of Democrats simply is not the change we need, nor is it change we can a

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 11/01/2008 6:33:53 PM

    FUN QUOTES FROM PALIN
    I got all of these quotes off of google quotes
    You really couldn't make up this kind of stuff up if you wanted to
    This all part of the reason why so many important republicans have been saying she
    is a joke

    When asked about her foreign policy experience she said
    "As Putin rears his head," she said, referring to Russian prime Minister Vladimir Putin, "and comes into the airspace of the United States of America, where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border."
    TELLING THE TRUTH FOR A CHANGE SHE HAD THIS TO SAY ABOUT HER RUN FOR VP
    "It's time that normal Joe Six-Pack American is finally represented in the position of vice-presidency"
    WHEN ASKED TO NAME ONE SUPREME COURT DECISION AND NOT BEING ABLE TO SHE CAME UP WITH THIS ANSWER
    "I'm in that sense a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas"
    when asked again to name one decision she responded
    "Well, let's see. There's -- of course -- in the great history of America rulings there have been rulings"
    When asked about being a redneck she said
    "Someone called me a `redneck woman' once. You know what I said back? `Thank-you very much.'"
    when asked what promises she might not be able to keep
    "How long have I been at this, like five weeks? So there hasn't been a whole lot that I've promised, except to do what is right..."

    Talking to dobson about prayer she said
    "It is that intercession that is so needed and so greatly appreciated," Palin told Dobson. "And I can feel it too, Dr. Dobson. I can feel the power of prayer, and that strength that is provided through our prayer warriors across this nation."

    When asked about being a environmentalist she originally said
    "I'm not an Al Gore, doom-and-gloom environmentalist blaming the changes in our climate on human activity."
    when asked again later if she thought people had a impact on global warming
    "Show me where I have ever said that there's absolute proof that nothing that man has ever conducted or engaged in has had any effect or no effect on climate change,"
    asked about voting she said
    "I truly believe that the wisdom of the people will be rebuilt on [Election Day]. As they enter that voting booth, they will understand the stark contrast between the two tickets,"
    when asked how mccain did at his first debate
    "I just thought he was great, because the American people are angry, and John McCain is angry, too
    when asked about tina feys imitation of her she said
    "I watched it with the volume all the way down," Palin said. "I thought it was hilarious."

    IS SHE KIDDING IS THIS WHOLE THING A JOKE
    IS IT REALLY POSSIBLE SOMEONE COULD BE THIS CLUELESS
    SOMEONE THAT THINKS THEY COULD RUN THE COUTRY NOW LESS
    VOTE OBAMA BIDEN NOW AND SEND HER BACK TO ALASKA

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 11/01/2008 6:33:03 PM

    Comment: After 9/11, the US government started rounding up Muslims without cause and without due process of law, like we did to the Japanese Americans in WWII. The Bush administration called it's main internment camp Guantanamo Bay. While there are certainly many guilty terrorists held in Guantanamo, there are also many innocent American citizens who have been held illegally for years without even being charged with any crime. They have been tortured by our government. Some of them have died.

    Recently the Supreme Court ruled against the Bush administration in the matter of Guantanamo Bay. The Supreme Court Justices were NOT on the side of the terrorists. They were on the side of the Geneva Convention, that says you can not torture POWs, and on the side of US laws that state you can not imprison a person without charging them with a crime and bringing them to trial. I'm sure that like most Americans, the Justices who voted against the illegal, immoral doings at Guantanamo didn't feel sympathy for the terrorists. They felt sympathy for the laws of AMERICA, the land of the FREE, where even rat finks get a fair trial.

    Meanwhile, back in Iraq, the Bush administration is busy trying to build a smokescreen to hide the CRIMES they have committed. Those pesky weapons of mass destruction. Just think, the National Debt went up over 6 trillion dollars under Bush. More than 2 TRILLION of it went directly into the pockets of Halliburton, a corporation owned by the Cheney family. Halliburton is now a DUBAI corporation and therefore is not subject to US taxes. All that money they took out of the US Treasury is going into the coffers of a MUSLIM country.

    Did you hear about how the US government is being charged millions for Halliburton deliveries of sand into Iraq from Kuwait? Sand. Like there is a shortage of sand in Iraq? Another contractor shipped sand from Idaho to Iraq at our expense. Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz discusses these and other excesses of our current government's out of control spending in Iraq.

    Your grandchildren will be working like slaves to pay off this debt, so that the Bushes and Cheneys can live the high life in Dubai.

    Yeah, they're patriots, Bush&Co. They wear flag pins. And hide the money they stole from America in Dubai.

    And they want me to believe that Obama is a socialist. Right.

    In case you think McCain is any different than Bush, watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdJUCU1UH2w

  • Posted By: Vote Now @ 11/01/2008 6:32:43 PM

    THE GREAT BUSH DEPRESSION
    I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly.
    He perfectly predicted the current meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen next
    is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.
    The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide ,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch , Fanny and Freddy Mae ,AIG
    The government took them over because they are bankrupt. Even with the goverment nationalizing hundreds of billions of dollars in debt the stock market is crashing
    the credit markets are frozen and all of us may suffer beyond anything seen in generations
    McCain just like Bush " doesn't understand the economy".
    That not just my opinion its his own words. Not only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand how its been broken.
    It is no surprise that he doesn't. The people that make up these securities use quantum mathematical models very few people understand.
    Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.
    Bush's economic advisor Phil Graham wrote the deregulation bill that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.
    Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain's economic policy.He is also McCain's choice for the next secretary of the treasury.
    No one in this country can afford for that to happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He was the last to know somthing was wrong. Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime. Check out this link to the truth http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
    It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be
    even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a budget surplus like Bush did but a crashing economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit. Most of it Bush created and it will take decades to pay it back.
    If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.
    When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.
    So why are the polls even close then ?
    Mccains team just said they no longer want to talk about the economy.Instead they would like to spend time talking about obama
    which means running the biggest smear campaign in history.
    They think they can just tell you lies and you wont be smart enough to see through it
    Let's teach him we are smarter than that
    Stand up and hold them accountable
    Bush isn't on the ballot this year but his policies are
    Elect Obama Biden 2008






    Check out this video of sarah palins interview and ask your self if she understands what she is talking about.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r36Xc0GG4iQ

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse