Why It’s Time for a ‘Green New Deal’

i am looking for a green project

Humanity shall have practically free transportation tapping into the eternal gravitational force. Please see the channel www.youtube.com/atrilab.
Newton and Climate Change
Newton is a unique scientist whose work remains relevant to humanity after centuries and even for space age travel. He is said to have born on 25 Dec 1642 as per Roman calendar, but Europe reset the date to Jan 4th, 1643 as per Gregorian calendar later on.

Let me share a secret unused by us for the last 300 years. His theories on gravity can help us meet the energy needs of humanity to transport people and goods. Using the approach outlined below transportation is possible at speeds of 210 mph from city to city. Retooled cars/trucks on gravity-powered roads allow for transportation without fossil fuels and transport cargo from any point to any point at 60-mph. Existing metro rail can be powered by gravity doing away the electrical traction.

Detailed specification in US Patent application number: 12184151 dated 07/31/2008 provides more information regarding the "Gravity Powered Rail, Road and Runways transportation systems".
(www.atrilab.com)
The existing roads and rail infrastructure can be primarily powered by gravity attaining speeds of 60 mph.


The implications are gravitational force can provide in case of USA:
1. 360 KMPH rail based intercity transportation saving 87% of electrical energy
2. Urban metros, even existing ones can save 97% of electrical energy
3. Cargo can be moved from any point to any point in USA with gravity power, saving 97% of energy from fossil fuels
4. USA can stop importing 8m barrels of oil daily and stop 3.5b tons of carbon emissions per annum


The projects for USA would need investment of $450 billion, but no subsidy from the government, because they generate 30 to 40% cash surpluses. They generate also close to one million jobs. Eternal free gravity force can kick start projects in all the states for transportation infrastructure to be futuristic, totally powered by gravitational force. Within four years, we can complete the commercial implementation and get benefits, without any need for waiting for research to be completed.

We need a paradigm shift in transportation scene with "green" energy from Newton's gravity and the game changer solution is ready for implementation.

Problems in USA and the world in my opinion that mass-media and world most influential persons have Al Gore vision about Global Warming. It is far from scientific. Our discussion will read one or two persons. The same "Newsweek" will not published my full article about Economy, Energy and Global Warming despite as I think As Christopher Dickey as Tracy McNicoll repeat the same mistakes of Al Gore that carbon dioxide is only one player in the Nature.

1. Clouds reflect huge parts of solar energy back to space: thick clouds-75-90%, thin clouds-30-50%;
2. Forests contain much more carbon than does grass and they also absorb more sunlight and produce more water vapor, which affect cloud formation.
3. Water vapor is one of the lightest gases and has tendency to go up to cloud level. Water has another properties it takes a lot of energy to evaporate water. Evaporation of water will cool air temperature. Despite that water vapor is greenhouse gas, it tendency to go up bring them on cloud level, where distances between molecules bigger and heat in form of infrared radiation will go to space more easily than on ground level. No others greenhouse gases have these properties. Of course, reduction of carbon dioxide in the air will cool the Earth. Water vapor will also cool the Earth. We need increase evaporation of water. It is significantly cheaper then efforts to reduce greenhouse gases.
4. Sun is the best source of energy to evaporate water from growing trees. Water evaporates from surface of oceans, seas, rivers, and lakes. It also evaporates from land, grass, leaves of trees. If tree grows on some area surfaces of all its leaves will be many times bigger than area where it grows. It mean that evaporation of water in this case will be the biggest and not only will cool the air of the Earth but also produce the cheapest, really ???green??? source of energy, which can be used in any time during hundreds of years.
5. White fresh snow reflects to space 75-95% of Sun radiation. White cars, houses, roads will do the same.
6. Energy of the wind thanks to convection bring heavy carbon dioxide molecules on top level, where infrared radiation also more easely escapes to space. Energy of the wind evaporates water from any surfaces on the ground. It is also evaporates water vapor from fog, clouds and droplets of rain in all atmosphere. These processes cool the air and the best tools in fighting global warming.

Al Gore suggestion that only carbon dioxide reduction will cool the air of Earth is true only in situation when we completely forget about property of water vapor and role of wind in cooling air of the Earth. We need to respect Al Gore for bringing attention to global warming problems and at the same time correct his solutions.

I agree a great time to take people's mind's off of Wall St. and onto Main St. with a new focus on clean energy. Government subsidies would go far in this regard.
Christopher Thaens
Tampa Bay, Florida

Ordinary citizens will fix global warming when they fully understand the problem and the available cures. The globe is covered with a thin layer of atmosphere a few miles thick. That layer of air weighs about the same as a layer of water over 30 feet deep. In other words, the atmosphere is a relatively thin layer. Our atmosphere contains a small percentage of carbon dioxide. In 1950, the atmosphere contained 280 parts of carbon dioxide gas for every one million parts of air. However, by 2000, the CO2 level had risen above 360 ppm and the rate of increase has been accelerating.
The problem of global warming is caused by the increase in carbon dioxide in our atmosphere causing an excessive greenhouse effect. Global warming is occurring because we have increased the quantity of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The actual thickness of CO2 in our atmosphere is miniscule in physical terms.
Carbon dioxide is composed of one atom of carbon combined with two atoms of oxygen. The thickness of carbon that is causing the erratic climatic changes throughout the world is tiny. However, despite the miniscule quantity of carbon, removal is essential for mankind. Otherwise, the deleterious effects of global warming will increase. Worldwide temperatures will rise even more rapidly over time. Temperatures will continue to rise for centuries and ocean water temperatures will increase. Climates will become destabilized and unpredictable. These issues among many other environmental concerns are discussed in detail in the hard-hitting environmental forum www.onebiosphere That forum holds no punches and levels criticism against environmental groups where they are failing due to political power plays and caving into power plays and financial interests at the expense of the deteriorating envrionment.

Ordinary citizens will fix global warming when they fully understand the problem and the available cures. The globe is covered with a thin layer of atmosphere a few miles thick. These issues are discussed in detail in an environmental forum www.onebiosphere.com This website presents objective views and is not afraid to take on environmental groups to expose their weaknesses
. However, by 2000, the CO2 level had risen above 360 ppm and the rate of increase has been accelerating.
The problem of global warming is caused by the increase in carbon dioxide in our atmosphere causing an excessive greenhouse effect. Global warming is occurring because we have increased the quantity of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The actual thickness of CO2 in our atmosphere is miniscule in physical terms.
Carbon dioxide is composed of one atom of carbon combined with two atoms of oxygen. The thickness of carbon that is causing the erratic climatic changes throughout the world is tiny. However, despite the miniscule quantity of carbon, removal is essential for mankind. Otherwise, the deleterious effects of global warming will increase. Worldwide temperatures will rise even more rapidly over time. Temperatures will continue to rise for centuries and ocean water temperatures will increase. Climates will become destabilized and unpredictable.

Clearly, all our economic efforts must be directed to public works projects for renewable energy systems, with the exception of biofuels. The more we invest here, the value our country accumulates. It reduces our dependence on fossil fuels that create greenhouse gasses to reduce global warming. It stops us from sending money to countries that want to cause us harm. It keeps our money in the US and helps revive our economy. If we can get homeowners to install residential solar/wind systems that will dramatically reduce their family???s energy expenditures, they will have more money to help pay for social security and healthcare. This is the gift that keeps on giving.

Along with some solar farms, wind farms, and yes, some nuclear power plants, perhaps they should open solar panel and residential wind turbine factories. I think they need to open mines to supply the materials for the solar panels. If we can dramatically increase the availability of these products, the price should become more affordable.

Frankly, I feel those stimulus checks do nothing more than increase the budget deficit and send money to China for wide-screen TVs.

In the exchange with "Joe the plumber" Obama unintentionally revealed that he really is as radical as his early political mentors and acquaintances, Davis, Ayers, Wright, Khalidi etc., (gee, there sure seem to be a lot of them) and that he is into the failed economic policy of wealth redistribution. Now there is absolute proof. In 2001, Obama, the "community organizer" turned legislator, said in an interview:

"And I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was that the civil rights movement became so court-focused, I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and organizing activities on the ground that are able to bring about the coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that,"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview.

Obama's tax and spending plans alone would be bad enough, but add Reid and Pelosi to the mix, with the three of them controlling both houses of Congress and the executive branch without any effective restraint, and you have something that should causes concern even among moderate Democrats.
See Wall Street Journal: A Liberal Supermajority:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html

Indeed, some democrats are publically saying as much. See Barney Franks comments on the news, including face the nation last week, stating essentially that Democrats in Congress intend to greatly raise taxes and go on a spending spree.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1Mazjm_A5k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGnSAlqjoU

See http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/23617.html

Obama's ill-conceived programs will require him to tax, and his health care plan alone is a substantial hidden tax on all business, large an small. In reality, it does not really matter who he taxes, those taxes are going to be passed through the economy. He has to tax, because it is they only way he can pay for his massive social engineering experiments. Any first year economics student knows that taxation is a tool used to contract an economy experiencing inflation, because it reduces demand by reducing the amount of money individuals and businesses have to spend. It is contractionary, which is exactly what you do not want to do when the problem is that the economy is contracting already into recession. Like Hoover and FDR, Obama's plans will only make it worse for longer.

See e.g. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/10/03/opinion/main4499465.shtml
And
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx


The democrats failed social engineering policies in the housing market are what brought us to ruin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314&feature=related
Even Bill Clinton says so. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsynspIqAoE
Obama and a supermajority of Democrats simply is not the change we need, nor is it change we can afford.

This moronic scumbag Samuel J. Wurzelbacher "Joe the Plumber" had his AZ driver license suspended

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/128323

Wurzelbacher, who lived in Mesa in 2000 and had an Arizona driver's license, had his driver's license suspended by the Arizona Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Division on May 4, 2000, following a nonpayment of a court-imposed fine for civil traffic violations, according to court records.

...owes nearly $1,200 in back taxes, according to public records, still owes more than $700 to the Mesa court system.

Records show he was cited for failure to stop at a red light and for failure to provide proof of insurance on Feb. 9, 2000, in a black Dodge truck at the intersection of Dobson and Baseline roads in Mesa.

After failing to pay his original fine of $627.50 issued in March 2000, his license was suspended and the fine was handed over to a collection agency along with a 16 percent surcharge. The now-resident of Holland, Ohio, still owes $727.90 to the Mesa Municipal Court, according to court records.

Hopefully the collection agency will break both of his legs so he'll never be able to walk nor work ever again. This typical Republican scumbag deserves it.

Thanks for this refreshing look at how world leaders are looking at global warming solutions as a powerful way to rejuvenate the global economy with clean energy. On the domestic front, there is ample <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/paltman/clean_energy_just_the_stimulat.html/">evidence</a> that green investments coupled with a strong global warming policy would create millions of jobs in the United States.

Well, like I always believe, now it's not the time to discuss who has done more and who has not taken the action yet. It's time to take action from ourselves! Like Obama always emphazies, we can make a difference if we do it together. - chavy @ www.waystosaveenergy.net

Well, like I always believe, now it's not the time to discuss who has done more and who has not taken the action yet. It's time to take action from ourselves! Like Obama always emphazies, we can make a difference if we do it together.

Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005),
What does redistributive mean. Well, remember that it was the liberal Left-Wing Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court that brought us this little jewel, holding that the government could take your real property, like your home, not for public use like a road or school, but to give to another private individual, such as a political contributor or other party hack or interest group.
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another to further economic development. The case arose from the condemnation by New London, Connecticut, of privately owned real property so that it could be used as part of a comprehensive redevelopment plan. The Court held in a 5-4 decision that the general benefits a community enjoyed from economic growth qualified such redevelopment plans as a permissible "public use" under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the majority opinion; he was joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer
The decision was widely criticized by American politicians and the general public. Many members of the general public viewed the outcome as a gross violation of property rights and as a misinterpretation of the Fifth Amendment, the consequence of which would be to benefit large corporations at the expense of individual homeowners and local communities. Some in the legal profession construe the public's outrage as being directed not at the interpretation of legal principles involved in the case, but at the broad moral principles of the general outcome.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

Honestly, looking at McCain and Obama objectively (without any party affiliation or any racism) I really can't see why anybody would vote for McCain. Obama has offered a much more coherent plan to get America out of the economic disaster we are in.

Right now, most people are anxious about the economy, fearing the worst but hoping for the best.

Reality check: within 18 months YOU could be standing in a bread line. That's how bad it really is. And Obama will work actively to prevent this short term, as well as make us strong again long term. As much as I like McCain and admire his patriotism, he really is not up for the job, not now with the global markets falling apart.


Obama's economic plan can be found at:

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/economy/index.php

Here's an excellent video about the economy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d4a6RNhCUo

To all of the conservatives out there who think that Obama is a flaming liberal, I would like to remind you of what he did when he was elected President of the Harvard Law Review. The Law Review President gets to name ten individuals to write articles for the Review, and these ten people get to control the content of the publication. All of the minorities and the liberals thought they finally had it made, that Obama would appoint ten left wing editors. Instead, Obama appointed three conservatives, three liberals and four moderates. That year the Law Review was critically acclaimed as the best run and best written Harvard publication in decades.

So when he wins in November, conservatives don't have to freak out. Obama is a centrist and will appoint a balanced cabinet full of active people who will really get things done. Kind of like the way our multi-cultural society is supposed to be. And exactly what we need in this time of economic crisis.

Whoo boy. I'm going to have to post a response to this. This needs some serious thinking about and discussion.