SPONSORED BY:

Projections of Power

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

He needs to make an equally forceful and honest case for new energy initiatives. It's welcome news that oil prices have dropped dramatically: this offers relief to consumers and may help contain inflationary pressures. But there's the danger of allowing the urgency of the quest for alternative sources of energy to wane. Americans have to begin to match actions with words about pursuing more energy-efficient lifestyles, while investing heavily in the new technologies that will gradually decrease their dependence on foreign oil. Many of those changes and investments will encounter political resistance, but the new president can't afford to backpedal on them. America's standing in the world will depend as much on maintaining a healthy economy with truly modern energy strategies as it will on keeping up its military strength.

The nexus between energy and foreign policy is particularly visible in the West's dealings with Russia. As oil prices soared, so did Russian assertiveness on the world scene—and anger over perceived offenses such as the possibility of further NATO expansion and the missile-shield deal with Poland and the Czech Republic. Then there was the conflict with Georgia. Of course plenty of factors were at work here, but the fact that Russia felt emboldened by its new wealth was certainly one of them.

Declining oil prices, coupled with a much more dramatic drop in Russia's stock market than anywhere in the West, brought home the point that this new wealth is built on a shaky foundation. Too much of this wealth has been squandered by the super rich, instead of using it to rebuild the country's infrastructure and a more diversified economy, less dependent on commodity prices. If bold new moves by the new American government begin to change the long-term energy outlook, Russia will need to rethink its priorities at home and abroad. At that point, the benefits of cooperation rather than confrontation should become much more apparent to both sides.

Russia's relations with its neighbors and the West feature constant replays of the tired arguments about NATO expansion and the war in Georgia, full of mutual recriminations. The challenge for a new U.S. administration is to break out of this no-win situation, and look for ways to engage Russia with the U.S. and its allies to produce win-win situations. This doesn't mean turning a blind eye to Washington's differences over such issues as the Kremlin's reversion to authoritarian politics at home or attempts to intimidate its neighbors, but it does mean looking for common ground where it is in both our interests to do so.

The most promising area for a dramatic new breakthrough could involve the biggest legacy of the cold war: both sides' huge arsenals of nuclear weapons. Four American elder statesmen—former secretaries of state Henry Kissinger and George Shultz, former secretary of state William Perry and former senator Sam Nunn—have been advocating a nuclear "zero option"—the abolition of all nuclear weapons. Once seen as a purely utopian vision, this has stimulated a growing debate about massive cutbacks, which was the focus of a major EastWest Institute conference at the United Nations on Oct. 24. "Such initiatives deserve greater

support," U.N. Secretary-general Ban Ki-moon told the gathering. He also urged all nations to seek an international convention on nuclear weapons backed by a strong verification system or to pursue separate agreements.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: lovejusticepeace @ 11/06/2008 11:42:25 AM

    Nuns raped in broad daylight in front of policemen in Orissa.
    Doctors pulled out of policevan and slaughtered by MaharashtraNavnirmanSena (MNS) during the recent riots in Kalyan ,Mumbai.
    The head of state , PrimeMinister Manmohan Singh is not invited to the Beijing Olympics but someone else
    namely Sonia Gandhi who is just a party president .
    Is India a powerless superpower?
    Is India a leaderless ,leading country of the world ?
    c.c.Newsweek ,IndianExpress ,NewYorkTimes , Times of India , etc.

  • Posted By: ObamaYesWeCan @ 11/04/2008 6:47:59 PM

    WITH INSURMOUNTABLE LEADS IN ALL THE POLLS, THE QUESTION IS NO LONGER WHO WILL WIN, BUT HOW BIG OF A LANDSLIDE OBAMA WILL WIN BY: 90%? 80%? 70%? HENCE, IT CAN ALREADY BE DECLARED THAT OUR SAVIOR, BARACK OBAMA, HAS WON AND WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF OUR NEW OBAMACA NATION.

    THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR SUPPORT AND DEDICATION. WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY SMITED THE UNBELIEVERS AND OPENED THE ONE AND ONLY GATE TO HEAVEN. GOD BLESS US, GOD BLESS US ALL.

    THE ONLY THING LEFT IS FOR MCCAIN TO DROP DEAD OR CONCEDE ALREADY. WE HAVE WON FOR THE GOOD OF THE WHOLE WORLD!

  • Posted By: Lee Holmes @ 11/04/2008 3:51:49 PM

    It is important in the extreme to observe that these calls for ''sacrifice''eminate from those who will sacrifice the least. Whether Francophiliac hacks like Nagorski ,or NEWSWEAK scribblers such as Darman[who actually has a NEWSWEAK video on the subject of ''sacrifice''], their jobs,even if torpedoed by the increasingly untenable NEWSWEAK [whose position in the Washington Post group ownership of the uniquely liberal rag is failing as we write], will be assured in some other media venue. SLATE perhaps,MOTHER JONES,or similar leftleaning mouthpiece.
    VD Hansons opposite number over at JONES,as it happens,is leftwinger Kevin Drum,who writes today of this ''sacrifice'' fearing its more lasting implications. If it is seen by Americans that they are the ones suffering,and they have merely replaced one set of ''plutocrats'' or ''aristocrats'' with another,who continue to live fat on our dime,rank with the corruption we are already seeing in Washington under the end of the second year of Democrat leadership,these will rebel,and we will go through yet another series of ''toss the bums out''all over again.
    It becomes important to acknowlage that the successes of the Clinton administration in the domestic sector were those of a split government,with both sides having to practice compromise. The all-GOP show wrecked this,and there is no reason not to believe that an all-Democrat show will not wreck it further. Indeed as admitted to last week on C-SPAN by Rhode Island liberal socialist Sen.Sheldon Whitehouse,''there are no plans to work with the Republican minority'' in the new administration and congress.
    This will be a catastrophe in waiting,for all of America. There will be no ''national healing'' or ''reconciliation''. the lines on both sides of the fence will harden,and little will get done that will ultimately benefit Americans who were not a portion of the ''buy now pay later'' group so glibly advanced by the above writer.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

Newsweek on Digg