SPONSORED BY:

Journalists from NEWSWEEK and TheRoot.com discuss the future of the Repulican party if Barack Obama wins the presidential election.

INTERNATIONAL

A Case for Barack Hussein

An Obama presidency would change the way the Middle East sees America, argues the editor of a Moroccan newsmagazine

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

With the U.S. elections at hand, a victory by John McCain seems unlikely. All of my East Coast-educated American buddies would be angry and aggrieved if McCain managed to pull off an eleventh-hour upset. Being from the Middle East—which is to say, being no fan of George W. Bush—they would expect the same from me. How could I feel otherwise about McCain, who said, after a supporter accused Barack Obama of being an Arab, "No, he's a decent man."

Journalists from NEWSWEEK and TheRoot.com discuss the future of the Repulican party if Barack Obama wins the presidential election.

The truth is, most people from Morocco, where I live, haven't been following the horse race between McCain and Obama closely, and I think that's true of people elsewhere in the Middle East. If McCain wins, they will hardly notice. For them, it will be business as usual. What else would they expect from a people who not only elected W., but re-elected him? Along with my fellow Arab-Muslim citizens, I would just go on thinking that supreme power in the United States belongs to conservative WASP upper-class folks who know nothing about us yet pretend to reshape our future through friendly wars. I would shrug my shoulders, pray and move on—and blame myself for having believed in change, along with many Americans and polling institutions.

Change. What a magic word. That's what it would take—magic—for us to change the situation in which people from the Middle East have been stuck since 2003: between the Satan and the deep blue sea—between the Great Satan, who bombs and humiliates us for the sake of democracy, and the ground-winning Islamic fundamentalists who threaten to overwhelm us. (By the way, contrary to the world according to Fox News, the vast majority of us want nothing to do with these guys.)

I am a secularist journalist and longtime admirer of the values on which the United States was founded. I find the American Constitution (especially its First Amendment) so beautiful it can make me cry. Yet even so, I can't muster a good argument against those bearded guys who rail about "what America did to us." Under the George W. Bush presidency, an Arab-Islamic country was attacked for no valid reason. As a direct or indirect consequence, hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians were killed, and probably millions were wounded, in a tragic Catch-22 situation. American citizens didn't see many of the unbearable images of wailing mothers and angry mobs that have been broadcast every day for the past five years on Al-Jazeera and other pan-Arab channels. We did. How could we not be hypnotized by them? How could we not sympathize with them? Saddam Hussein was a vicious dictator, for sure. But the situation in Iraq and the Middle East is far worse since he was overthrown. That is largely because America's involvement in the region provided a splendid opportunity for hate groups to take root and prosper.  "God damn Bush's America" became a famous slogan.

On that point, to my great sorrow, I had to back the Islamists. Eventually, I tried to counter the brainwashing and press-ganging the Islamists inflicted on my people in the name of striking back against America. It was a difficult task, believe me. A few Americans wished me luck.

This is why it is so important for me that the face of the United States changes in this election. I mean dramatically—by a clear-cut Obama victory. It would be far tougher for the Islamists to point the finger at America if it were led by a man whose middle name is Hussein. Not that they won't try anyway. As long as U.S. troops are stationed in Iraq, they will continue to condemn. But U.S. troops will back off within 16 months, as Obama has promised. (I am hoping that's not just talk.) Then the credibility of those who do the damning will fade. The battle in Afghanistan may drag on; it may escalate. But this war, unlike the one in Iraq, didn't turn the average Arab-Muslim mad. The Taliban hosted Al Qaeda, which is guilty of attacking the United States on 9/11; America hit back, and still is. It sounds perfectly fair. (If only you could get a move on, that would be cool. I mean, it's been almost seven years now.) Getting the job done—cutting down Al Qaeda and catching bin Laden—would comes as a relief for everyone, Arabs included. In our part of the world, it would empower the secular among us, helping us reverse the Islamist curse.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: crysfortheworld @ 01/08/2009 10:39:57 AM

    I feel that by going to that school as a child has given him an advantage he has learned how to talk to other people of other an other faith with out insulting them. so just maybe he may be able to find a way to reach at least a diplomatic accord then just maybe we may have a few years of peace and compassion for our fellow humans on this planet we have to share.

  • Posted By: 40YearR @ 11/22/2008 1:11:34 AM



    greatmidwest, I wish I could do better because yours deserves it, but: wow

  • Posted By: 40YearR @ 11/22/2008 1:09:09 AM



    Oh, no....you....too...?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now