Please, PLEASE run Palin in 2012. LOL.
Please, PLEASE run Palin in 2012. LOL.
Palin: Lets just get some more expense forms.
Turnout : The Diversed Demographic an how obama brought them all Together.
by DemFromCT
Wed Nov 05, 2008 at 05:13:54 PM PST
The kids really are alright. And not just the kids showed up.
First Read links to the voter-eligible population expert, Michael McDonald from George Mason University, who notes that the turnout percentage is awesome:
Provided the number stands, the turnout rate for yesterday's election was the highest in 100 years, according to the estimate from turnout guru Dr. Michael McDonald at George Mason University. Almost 137 million (136,631,825) went to the polls -- 64.1% of the voting-eligible population. 1960 saw 63.7% of the populace go out to vote; In 1908, 65.7% voted. It was, of course, the most people ever to go to the polls topping 2004's 122 million. That's 12% increase from 2004.
For those wondering why the current total vote in the presidential adds up to approximately 117 million, note that it's going to climb. There is still a ton of vote missing on the West coast.
However, it's not clear how big the total will be.
Curtis Gans, director of the nonpartisan Committee for the Study of the American Electorate at American University and dean of turnout experts, said his early numbers show 2008 to be about equal to or better than 1964, but not higher than 1960. He said it looks like total votes, once absentees are tallied (which could take a day or so), will be "somewhere between 134 and 135 million."
That's still the highest turnout in 40 years percentage wise (it was 60.1 of the voter-eligible population in 2004, and you have to go back to 1968 to get a figure that's at least 60%.)
From Prof. McDonald (more complete data here):
1960 63.8
1964 62.8
1968 62.5
1972 56.2
1976 54.8
1980 54.2
1984 55.2
1988 52.8
1992 58.1
1996 51.7
2000 54.2
2004 60.1
We commented this morning on the changing demographics ( less fewer whites.) In 2000, the exit polls put whites at 81%.
Maybe McCain's campaign would have worked better in 2000. Maybe what thwarted it was this:
There is a chance that American turnout will match or surpass the 1960 turnout, and if it does, that will mean approximately 136 million people voted. That raw number will be the most people who have ever voted in an American election.
Welcome to the 21st Century.
The Sarah Palin Disastor !!!
By DemFromCT
Thu Nov 06, 2008 at 04:36:13 AM PST
One of the delightful things about poll watching is the chance to delve into the internals and see what Americans think. Not what the agenda-driven pundits tell you Americans think, but what they really think. For example, America is a center-right country the way New England is a center-right region. You know New England. That would be the place where there are no Republican House members.
How did that happen? Sarah Palin. Oh, not Sarah herself. She wasn't running against Jim Himes in CT-04, or Chris Murphy in CT-05 or Joe Courtney in CT-02 (don't call him Landslide Joe any more. While he won his first race in 2006 by 83 votes, he won his second on Tuesday by over 100,000.) But every Republican represented the party that supported George W.Bush and his even more ignorant, vindictive and petty replacement.
Here's some exit poll information that needs to be fully understood:
The Palin supporters need to understand that the country (60% of the country) in blow-out landslide numbers say "NO WAY". It doesn't matter how invested her supporters are. The public decided Palin was a bigger drag on the McCain candidacy than George Bush, the President with the 20% approval rating. An exaggeration? Not at all.
An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll in October showed she had become a bigger drag on McCain than President Bush, with voters citing her qualifications as their primary concern.
A CNN poll released last weekend showed Palin's unfavorable ratings were twice as high as when McCain picked her, and 57 percent of Americans believed she didn't have the personal qualities a president needed.
The interesting thing is that the American public's opinion is so negative even before the long knives come out.
All of this is occurring with the backdrop of an impending civil war in the GOP as the party starts to implode. Sarah is the candidate of the Buchanan brigades and cultural conservatives. It doesn't matter how ignorant she is (Africa is a country), how resistant to improving herself (refuses prep for Katie Couric so Sarah can be Sarah), how venal ($150K on clothes for her herself and family) and how poorly prepared for governance (see Sarkozy "interview"). The real issue?
Sarah Palin had better stay in Alaska...
She had better Produce that [Alaskan-Candian Gas Pipeline] that she Falsely Claimed was already under Contruction, when there has been no piece of Pipeline laid on that project and the Canadian Gas Company are not bound to building this Gas Pipeline and the Native Canadian indian are also Blocking this Agreement, based on it going through their land . .
Not to mention, there's a Big Oil Corporation who is currently Building a Gas & Oil Pipeline in Alaska, while Palin waits on Canadian Litigation, revolving around the Canadian Litigation and the Native Canadian indian Land Dispute, revolving around their land and this proposed agreement with Palin & Canadian Company.
Palin had better get that [Gas Pipeline Project] going before she ever thinks of going for Any Political Position, because if she does not bring this [Gas Pipeline Project] Fruition, her A!! will be Exposed even moreso as a Liar, Fraud and Fake, that she currently is.
Plain had better not [Pardon] Ted Stevens, because if she does...
Her Fragile & Sensitive Political Career will have the Stake Driven it's Red Heart, regarding National Politics, such as Congress Woman or Senator.
I have the Suspicion She will [Pardon Stevens] based on what he knows about her via the Various Earmark Millions and the Jack Abramoff, Stevens & Sarah and Todd Palin Connection.
Her career will then be OVER in Politics as far as running for President or Vice President.
Look for 1. PiYush [Bobby] Jindal, 2. Tim Pawlenty, 3. Charlie [Closeted-Down Low] Crist and 4. Mike [Arkansas Baptist] Huckabee as the Next [Bleeding Bloody Red Republicans] to take a shot at the White House !!!
Sarah Palin will Not, I Repeat...Will Not be a Factor in 2012
If she does Not [Pardon Stevens] maybe a run for a 2nd Term as Governor and Cheerleader for the Republican Party, thats it !!!
Her Political tactics work well up their in the yukon, but does not bode well in the [Lower 48]
The Undisputed .......Truth
About Palin
I think Sarah Palin will still be in the political arena moving forward. With all the hatred being spewed about her you can tell she is a threat to the Democrats in the future, whether she run in 2012 or 2016(at which time she will still be relatively young, in her early 50s in 2016). If the GOP is smart they will wait until 2016 when she will have the rest of her Governor experience and what I believe will become Senate experience within the coming years. Here is what Rasmussen said about Governor Palin:
RASMUSSEN REPORTS.com
69% of GOP Voters Say Palin Helped McCain
Friday, November 07, 2008 Email to a FriendAdvertisement
Sixty-nine percent (69%) of Republican voters say Alaska Governor Sarah Palin helped John McCain???s bid for the presidency, even as news reports surface that some McCain staffers think she was a liability.
Only 20% of GOP voters say Palin hurt the party???s ticket, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Six percent (6%) say she had no impact, and five percent (5%) are undecided.
Ninety-one percent (91%) of Republicans have a favorable view of Palin, including 65% who say their view is Very Favorable. Only eight percent (8%) have an unfavorable view of her, including three percent (3%) Very Unfavorable.
When asked to choose among some of the GOP???s top names for their choice for the party???s 2012 presidential nominee, 64% say Palin. The next closest contenders are two former governors and unsuccessful challengers for the presidential nomination this year -- Mike Huckabee of Arkansas with 12% support and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts with 11%.
Three other sitting governors ??? Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, Charlie Crist of Florida and Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota ??? all pull low single-digit support.
These findings echo a survey earlier this week which found that Republicans were happier with their vice presidential candidate than with their presidential nominee. Seventy-one percent (71%) said McCain made the right choice by picking Palin as his running mate, while only 65% said the party picked the right nominee for president.
"sharenews": It's contempt, not hatred.
Oh, okay. Let's go with the term contempt. . . and that makes those spewing contempt much more respectable in these blogs. All that Gov. Palin did was accept to run for VP and it has been non stop ridicule every since. . . . I have never seen anything like it. . . which makes me think that she is and will be all the more a force to be reconded with down the road in politics. Guess we will see. . .
contempt Definition
con·tempt (k??n tempt???)
noun
the feeling or attitude of one who looks down on somebody or something as being low, mean, or unworthy; scorn
the condition of being despised or scorned
"sharenews"; I understand your concern. I do believe she has earned my contempt. It started when I learned that she had taken all the earmarked funds for the Bridge to Nowhere, after repeatedly bragging that she had told Congress "no thanks." There were others, but the capper for me has been how yesterday she spent so much time whining that all she had ever asked for was a diet Dr. Pepper, saying that she never wanted those clothes, when it is impossible for me to believe that the strong maverick she claims to be could have been forced or manipulated into accepting in excess of $150k of clothes. Either she is a lying hypocrit or a dolt.
The money that was to be used for the bridge instead went towards transportation needs . As for flip flopping on for the bridge and against the bridge and spinning half truths. . . Obama has been doing the same all through his campaigning. In some cases he was talking out of both sides of his mouth simultaneously. They are, after all, politions. As for the clothes. . . they just showed up for her per request by McCains campaign handlers. She was presented with these to upgrade her look to fit the prestigeous position she was in and rejected a good portion of the wardrobe that went back with price tags on them. If those are your contempt reasons well so be it. I dont think I had you in mind when I said spew hatred in my original post cuz I dont remember ever seeing your blogs during the summer and later. It is moreso those bloggers that dont state their points and nor support them with facts and then go on to personally attack the blogger for posting it.
.
IN MY OPINION: WAS IT PALIN WHO ENERGIZED THE REPUBLICAN BASE? OR COULD ANYONE OF THE BETTER QUALIFIED REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS, SUCH HUCKABEE, HAVE CREATED THE SAME EFFECT. WHY DID MCCAIN CHOOSE PALIN?
I BELIEVE THAT EVEN GOV. RICK PERRY OF TEXAS WOULD HAVE ELECTRIFIED THE REPUBLICAN BASE MORE SO THAN PALIN. BUT MACCAIN WAS SHOOTING FOR THE 18 MILLION VOTERS THAT HILLARY GOT WHICH INCLUDED A LOT OF WOMEN. HE PRESUMED THAT MOST OF THE WOMEN VOTERS THAT VOTED IN THE DEMO PRIMARY WOULD FOLLOW PALIN. THE MAC COMMITTED POLITICAL ASSUMASIDE BY PRESUMPTION.
THE TRICK WAS TO INFLATE PALINS REPUTATION AND IMAGE BY CLAIMING THAT SHE HAD EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE AS MAYOR OF LITTLE WASILLA AND 20 MONTHS A GOV. OF LITTLE ALASKA. IN REALITY, THIS AMOUNT AND KIND OF EXERIENCE WAS NOT ENOUGH TO QUALIFY HER TO WIN ANY POSTION IN THE MAJOR NATIONAL POLITICAL SCENARIO. PALINS PERFORMANCE DURING THE PROFESSIONAL INTERVIEWS DID NOT LIVE UP TO THE INFLATED REPUTATION AND IMAGE SHE WAS PORTRAYED AS IN THE PRO-REPUBLICAN MEDIA AND BY THE REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST.
PALIN RAN OUT OF IMPORTANT AND RELEVANT THING S TO TALK ABOUT AT THE ACCEPTANCE SPEECH DURING THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION. SHE PICKED UP A BAD HABIT OF BASHING OBAMA AS BEING A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER AND MOCKING ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL STRATEGIES THAT WIN ELECTIONS IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS.
THIS IS WHAT THE MAC AND PALIN DID PREDOMINANTLY ALL THROUGH THE CAMPAIGN: THEY USED MOCKERY, INSULT, AND LIES. THEY WERE JABBING AT OBAMAS REPUTATION AND JUDGEMENT HOPING THAT THE AMERICAN VOTERS WOULD HANG HIM UP TO DRY, BUT IT BACKFIRED???..THEY SERE THE ONES WHO WERE HANGED OUT TO DRY ON ELECTION DAY.
PALIN WAS NOT COGNIZANT OF THE FACT THAT THE AMERICAN VOTERS WANTED TO CHANGE THE POLITICAL PARTY IN CHARGE OF RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT WHICH WAS HER PARTY, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. ANOTHER THING THAT SHE DID NOT DID NOT REALIZE, IS THAT OBAMAS CAMPAIGN WAS ALSO PART OF A POWERFUL MOVEMENT AND SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION LONG OVERDUE. (REMEMBER THE SLOGANS: SI SE PUEDY , YES WE CAN, AND I HAVE A DREAM?) THAT IS ONE OF THE REASONS PALIN AND THE MAC LOOKED LIKE THEY WERE SPITTIN AGAINST THE WIND.
IF REPUBLICANS NOMINATE PALIN TO RUN FOR PRESDENT IN 2012, IT WOULD BE THE BEST THING THE REPUBLICANS CAN DO???.FOR THE DEMOCRATS. PALIN WILL NEVER CHANGE HER TACTICS. SPECIALLY IF SHE RESORT TO LIES, INNUENDOS, INSULT, AND MOCKERY TO GET HER POINTLESS MESSAGES ACROSS TO THE VOTERS.
GO OBAMA! GO BIDEN! SI SE PUEDE!
SEMPER FI!
I heard in the news Tucker saying that he does not want him or others who disagree with President Obama to be qualified as, you guess it....UN-AMERICAN!!!!
How sad!..The republicans have been blaming EVERYONE who disagrees wit them and Bush or their policies, yes Un-American BUT now they do not want democrats applying same tactics.
Republicans want THE RIGHT TO DISAGREE WITHOUT BEING CALLED UN-AMERICAN!!!!!
They should start be recognizing everyone HAVE THE SAME RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!
It's not only a right, but it's important that disagreements are voiced.
Just leave the slandr out of it and people will be happy to listen.
Palin is ABSOLUTELY INEPT. As the VP candidate she truly showed her TRUE self.
Actions speak so much louder than words and her actions speak volumes.
She does NOT belong in a governorship. She obviously rose too fast and can NOT professionally handle the power of higher office.
It is clear the people of Alaska do NOT vett their candidates for office.
Wake up Alaska. You really NEED to raise the professional bar for your political offices to avoid looking as incompetent and pathetic as Palin does right now.
Your magazine, much like the entirety of the main stream media, have absolutely no right in commenting on politics anymore. The shameful and disgusting way you all pushed the Obama ticket invalidates ANY and ALL credibility as a news source.
I only read your articles to amuse myself. Please refrain from commenting on Palin and keep to the business of being cheerleaders for our new president elect.
She was not vetted........
She did not gave tough comprehensive interviews.............
She lied about her own record in Alaska................
She provided a doctor letter the night before elections............
We know little about her TRUE record in Alaska, her executive experience and what we know is not pretty including the 22 M deficit she left in Wasilla, her earmarks frenzy, her unlawful appropriation of private land for the sport complex, her re-distribution of wealth from hiking oil companies taxes and giving it to Alaskan (she believes Alaskan natural wealth should be for Alaskan ALONE!, but the rest of us should pay for their bridge to nowhere!), her ethical violation and secrets emails of state business to avoid transparency, she hired her staff based on loyalty to her NOT qualifications, her charging the taxpayers per diem to stay at HER home and family personal traveling, the construction of her house by same contractor personnel that she awarded the sport complex contract and no building permit filed so no details, the award of the gas pipeline and her staff conflict of interest, the meth labs spreading in Alaska (why haven t she shake that easy one) and the list is very long........
We know so little about her beliefs, philosophies and her brains, again what we know is not pretty either. From the poor few interviews we had something to be really scare!, just her reasoning process was like a 5 years old child. Her ignorance of simple issues, she refused interviews with Larry King, maybe the only VP in recent history not to be interviewed by King. Her ridicule behavior in SNL, not presidential at all!...How she was fooled with the fake Sarkozy call was beyond believe, anyone with some brain should have noticed how awkward it was especially from a president talking about porno and her wife hot in bed? It really showed she would be a real disaster dealing with this dangerous world and should not be near that red phone or button.
What about her religious beliefs and statements at her church? And her witchcraft ceremonies with questionable pastor Muthee? And what about her association with the Alaskan Independence Party which seeks secession from the USA, what is more Anti-American than that? What about her speech few months ago in their convention saying God bless you and keep the GOOD work? What about her friends Mark Chryson and Steve Stoll members of the AIP as well that have influence her policies? What those ASSOCIATIONS say about her JUDGMENT?
Simply what about her LIES, we saw over and over even when debunked. And what about how well in her skin she is when she smears, distorts, appeal to hatred and division among Americans, do character assassination without base for her own gain (nothing in the Bible agrees with that), she looked happy and smiled!...I don t know how she could sleep at night..........
No, Sarah Palin need to stay in Alaska and will be lucky if elected again....Take care of her family that is in disarray big time. Her pregnant 17 years old and rumors her son is also her daughter???s (no medical record provided, why?). Her son had to choose between jail or Iraq....She had her own affair with her husband partner...She has a lot of soul searching to do and above all take care of her family and child (or gd-child) who needs special and devoted care.
CONTINUATION:
No, Sarah Palin need to stay in Alaska and will be lucky if elected again....Take care of her family that is in disarray big time. Her pregnant 17 years old and rumors her son is also her daughter???s (no medical record provided, why?). Her son had to choose between jail or Iraq....She had her own affair with her husband partner...She has a lot of soul searching to do and above all take care of her family and child (or gd-child) who needs special and devoted care.
Karen, she can't appoint herself to Stevens' seat. The Alaskan legislature passed legislation five years ago mandating a special election in the event of a vacancy in a senate seat. This was after Gov. Murkowski appointed his daughter to a vacant senate seat (his).
Those talking about the rebuild of the republican party:
Not until republicans start to walk the talk and behave like real patriots (not just talk about it) and VOTE for the best policies for the country instead of:
1- voting for their wallet because of taxes advantages, which only works for the richest and actually is false for must Americans that end up paying higher ???everything??? like with Bush and the tax break disappeared very fast in real life.....
2- voting for one line issue like abortion or gays, because republicans had ample time for over 6 years lately and 20 years out of last 28 in power to do something about it. They won t simply because they use it to take fanatics to the polls and once they solve it their way, people will look then for ISSUES.....something they do not want! Besides, politics and religion should not mix and one majority group should not IMPOSE their religious beliefs to a minority group. A president should GOVERN for ALL AMERICANS of ALL religions. Republicans NEED to understand the simple fact.............There are many issues in the Bible that are closer to Democrats: helping the poor, the sick, children, elderly, NO-killings, NO-greed etc..but they do not talk about those OTHER Bible teachings..............
Also Republicans must stop thinking they belong to THE TOP CLASS ELITE and that the democrats are the POOR that are asking for handouts. That republicans are the one who WORK and democrats are living of republicans taxes, because it is simply NOT TRUE. The truth and we just saw it recently, is that the top companies are the one LIVING OUT OF WORKERS TAXES! 2/3 of U.S companies and 68% of foreign companies DO NOT pay federal income tax. In the last 30 years 600 BILLIONS have been transferred from the bottom 80% to the top 20% tax-wide. Look CORPORATE WELFARE on the internet and see for yourself!. So it is simply a slogan to have people that do not do research vote for republicans, luckily more people are opening their eyes now........
Republicans must stop the lies, smear tactics, character assassination, fraud, disenfranchisement approach to wining elections INSTEAD of having (and achieving) an INTELLIGENT and PROGRESSIVE agenda for the country and all Americans with an ???strategic??? vision for years to come. Not to come to WA to squander surpluses and benefit all the friends and cronies leaving in shame but with the pocket plentiful. Their promises are just forgotten once they get there in a questionable way or by the supreme court order. Their approach as recent as few days ago was still the same.........the American people responded loud and clear!
Above all they must stop the hate, divisiveness among people, towns, states.........Select candidates based on the BRAINS not on the appeal to read meat!
And the list goes on...but you get the picture (I hope!).
Palin called herself CRUEL, MEAN-SPIRITED, IMMATURE, UNPROFESSIONAL AND JERK!!!!!!!!!!
Per HER own words those are the qualificatif of someone that ??? is taking things out of context and then tried to spread something on national news. It is not fair and not right.???
Well Sarah, you are taking NOW a taste of your OWN MEDICINE!!!
By the way, I am waiting for her RESIGNATION because it would be VERY UNPATRIOTIC on her part to WORK with a TERRORIST as President!
Also she should sell her 500K home and properties because the SOCIALIST, COMMUNIST President is soon in the W.H. and she should protect her assets and send them to...Switzerland?...wait I think they are socialist as well....Luxembourg?....Grand Cayman, Canada....all socialist! Well then UNDER the mattress!
I am waiting on McCain and Liberman to do the same, to quit because they should not work with a TERRORIST and McCain and Cindy should start selling their 7 or 8 homes and 13 cars and beer business and RUN out of this country before the SOCIALIST arrives!! I guess D. Trump and all billionaires should be doing the same.
No? well that tells you the TRUTH and that all you republicans have been taken for a FOOL!!! They do it every 4 years and still you are falling for it. I am glad many started to OPEN their eyes and ears and they showed it at the polls!
McCain, Liberman, Palin are all NOW PRAISING Obama and delighted to WORK with him! For those who still defended and believed republican DIRTY tactics, are you seeing the light at last?
Welcome President elect OBAMA!!!!!
NEWSWEEK IS A SICK PUBLICATIONI! YOU ARE BIASED........AND ONLY QUALIFY
FOR USE IN AN OUTHOUSE!
What are you doing HERE then..........there are plenty of Republicans biased media and blogs!
NEWSWEEK IS DISGUSTING! YOU PEOPLE ARE BIASED....AND YOU ARE SICK!
Unlike Fox News!
and Limbaugh...................
Right, and unlike Huff-n-Puff Post site and the rest of the majority of the mainstreammedia. . The Mainstream media has been proven (after at least a few studies ) to have been totally in the tank with Obama thru-out his campaign run.
I am an Obama and Clinton Democrat. I am neverthless appalled at the brutal treatment of Palin by the meddia and the McCain chicken****, mega-coward staff. . As I understand it, Palin'srole was to bring in the Republican base, which she achieved. McCaion brought in small to medium crowds while Palin brought in huge crowds to speaking events. Two of our greatest Presidents, Harry Truman and Ronald Reagan did not possess intellectual credentials but no one dare call either an underachievers Big John, San Diego
She got involved with the dirtiest machine in history, she should know what ASSOCIATION means.......
She hammered the subject with Obama but could not apply it to herself?
You harvest what you planted..........
Don t do to others what you don t want be done to YOU..............
Oh please don't tease us.
Don't just get our hopes up about a Palin rerun. PROMISE us that Palin will run in 2012.
Her delusion and self importance regarding both her ideas and positions will be such a throwback to the grand of party of the '04's. In 2012 It will all be so retro. So BUSH Retro.
I worked for Reagans election, I voted for Reagan and I believed in Reagans vision of America.
Sarah Palin is NO Ronald Reagan. I you see Reagan when look at Palin then you need your vision and facts checked.
If GOP wants to regain leadership than get back to providing responsible leadership that restores Americas economy and moral leadership around the world. And return to the understanding that government has NO ROLE in the private lives of its citizens.
Or you could just easily put your "faith" in the Sarah types within the party.
Self deception is a powerful tool that leads to destruction.
If the GOP gets lost in justifying its failures rather then learning from them -
then Sarah's your...ah "hope".
Hey - it's a heck of a lot easier than rebuilding a national party!
Sarah 2012!
Your quote: government has NO ROLE in the private lives of its citizens.
Well what about the hypocrisy of Abortion then? And having 6 years doing nothing about, none either for the last 20 years (in last 28) in power...............
Abortion is a PRIVATE MATTER of citizens..................
I saw somethng on the news yesterday - I wish I could remember teh detaisl - It was on one of the tv's at the gym and I was more interested in the game on a different tv.
I saw a scroll across the bottom of the screen mentioning that someone in the McCain campaign had mention she was unprepared for the debates and interviews. There was a comment about her not paying nearly enough attention to any single government debate in the past ten years. I have to say, it showed (at least in most interviews).
How could she not be able to name more than one issue the Supreme court was involved in and think she was ready for office?
Several times, I got the impression that putting her on the ticket was a bit of a gimmic. Her "lipstick" jokes and the "hockey mom" thing, just made it hard to take her serious.
If she wants to continue in Washington, she'll need a whole new plan.
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss