OPINION

Worst Campaign Ever?

John McCain's chaotic operation may well rank among recent history's least successful efforts.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Bexay6211 @ 11/07/2008 1:02:08 AM

    I am young so I have not witnessed many campaigns so who am i to say if it was the worst?
    Anyway what i really wanted to say is that this article is pretty pointless. Yes mistakes were made but whatever, it is in the past now. I went to to voting booths to vote FOR Obama, not to vote against McCain. John McCain has always been a good and honorable man, he has served our country well, and in ways most of us can't even fathom. I think if we do want to get this country re-united after, for me at least, a lifetime of divisive politics that really did accomplish their purpose of dividing our country we need to stop re-hashing the past and work to mend the briges that have long been burned. We are all Americans, and we should all remember that that is no small thing to be.

    • Posted By: bonju @ 11/09/2008 10:25:05 AM

      another problem I see is that the voting age was lower this time around. Allowing moron 20 year olds to vote is insane. This is what killed the chances for a smart white man to become our 44th Prez - now we are stuck with this silly empty suited socialist neoboob black guy for 4 years. I'm rooting for the skin heads - come men - make this blue lipped pig just like JFK and MLK - President biden I can stand for 4 years.

      • Posted By: steve.engle @ 11/10/2008 11:56:21 AM

        You've openly communicated a threat against the President-elect, which happens to be violate a federal law. I have reported you to Newsweek and will also cut & paste your e-mail and forward to the Secret Service. Good luck, in avoiding prosecuiton.

        You and your friends need to be locked up and the key lost forever. You're exactly what America needs right now. I guess that you're incapable of embracing either change or the need to mend fences. Good riddance. I hope that our paths cross one day, because you'd be in for a rude awakening.

  • Posted By: bonju @ 11/09/2008 10:18:21 AM

    it is very obvious to me that McCain was just going thru the motions. When he thought he might have a good chance at becoming prez - he chose Palin as his running mate. He was told by the GOP to run and then to lose. That is what he did. Man, he was the happiest loser on that Wed after election day I have ever seen.

    • Posted By: steve.engle @ 11/10/2008 11:39:10 AM

      You've openly communicated a threat against the President-elect ??? which happens to be violate a federal law. I have reported you to Newsweek and will also cut & paste your e-mail and forward to the Secret Service. Good luck, in avoiding prosecuiton.

      You and your friends need to be locked up and the key lost forever. You're exactly what America needs right now. I guess that you're incapable of embracing either change or the need to mend fences. Good riddance. I hope that our paths cross one day, because you'd be in for a rude awakening.

  • Posted By: over-taxedman @ 11/07/2008 10:14:17 AM

    Your assessment of this election cycle is thin at best. You fail to acknowledge the role of the press and media in this presidential race. A person would require a ???suspension of disbelief??? if they were to assert that the press and media treated each candidate equally. Time, Newsweek, just to name a few were completely enamored with Sen. B.H.O. Look at how many times Sen. B.H.O. appeared on the cover as compared to Sen. J.M. The bias was more than obvious, it was shameful. The press revealed their true bias when they sent a small army to Alaska for a witch hunt, and at the same time, ignored questionable associations of B.H.O. and his racists statements blaming ???white mans??? greed???. The press ignored questionable fund-raising, the role of ACORN not acting in a non-partisan way..... the list goes on and on. The entertainment media did everything possible to assassinate both candidates, but their treatment of Gov. S.P. was cruel and disgusting. They could not bare to witness a fine example of a successful woman, mother and public servant come to prominence as the VP pick. But I must conclude now, I have to go to work..... so I can pay more taxes to the new rising star, the man of hope, the agent of change, the new Cesar.

    • Posted By: nmbrldy69 @ 11/10/2008 11:38:54 AM

      Sounds as if you're in the "wealthier" class of citizens that McCain wants to give tax breaks to. I'm really glad your "breaks" don't break my back, because your McCain breaks would have to come from somewhere. Tax bennies to corporations and business, and wealthier individuals - that leaves the lower income folks - ones who can least afford it - to pay the bills for the tax bennies. Have fun at work - I know I will, knowing I'm paying my fair share, versus my share, your share, and other wealthier citizens.

  • Posted By: X-republican @ 11/10/2008 4:09:50 AM

    This message is for Republicans,
    for those of you who say that President Elect Obama is naive and lacks experience. Consider how Obama (a skinny unknown black man with big ears, and a Muslim name) started with nothing two years ago, then built a political movement from scratch, organizing and energizing millions of people to wage a grass roots campaign, raised hundreds of millions of dollars, and against all odds and predictions he outsmarted the Clinton campaign to win the Democratic Party Nomination !!! Then with his grass roots political organization he outsmarted and defeated the entire assembled Republican Party including slime-balls, political assassins like Carl Rove, and the "Pig wearing lipstick". If he could so deftly deal with all this and win the election (without even breaking into a sweat), this is the person that I want dealing with the Russians, Iranians, and other assorted nut-jobs that our president has to deal with... Now consider that, if you think Obama is so naive and inexperienced, where does that leave "losers" like you. If a naive and unknown black man with no experience and with a Muslim name can beat everything you can muster against him, you are less than him, you are less than naive and lacking experience. You are infantile... You should be thanking God that someone like Obama came along when we so desperately needed a president with the ability to unite us internally so that we can deal with our internal problems, and with the intelligence and wit to negotiate with our friends and enemies abroad...
    The Republican Party has turned into the "Party of Ignorance, Intolerance, Hate, & Lies"???
    It has become the "Clueless Clucks Clan".

  • Posted By: briana1 @ 11/09/2008 11:09:50 AM

    More college educated people voted for Obama than voted for McCain, proving that maybe it is the young people who actually have a brain. When selecing our president, it is clear that many more of us did not look at the color of our Pres Elects skin but rater his intelligence. It is definately time for a Smart Change in this country! I am proud of our country, I am proud to be and american, you should be too!

  • Posted By: Brooklyn Gurl @ 11/07/2008 11:32:26 AM

    Oh say can you see
    That GOD heard our plea
    For Obama to win
    All in favor say Yippee!

    • Posted By: bonju @ 11/09/2008 10:22:12 AM

      you have repeated this statement 3 times now and each time is as boring as the first.

  • Posted By: Dylan Rossi @ 11/08/2008 4:05:25 PM

    LuisaInCA, if all Americans are allowed to vote without having to stand in line for 4 plus hours, I can guarantee you the Republicans will never see the White House again. That is why the thing Republicans fear most is that the Democrats will push through a real Voting Rights Act that will make ALL states Early Voting States and which will require all states to have adequately staffed and equipped voting centers.

    • Posted By: LuisaInCA @ 11/08/2008 6:44:26 PM

      With all due respect, Dylan, all Americans are allowed to vote without standing in 4 hour lines. Anyone can request an absentee ballot. All Americans are also allowed to vote early -- again, via an absentee ballot.

      When I debate, I usually try to stick to facts (rather than conjecture), so I will refrain from commenting on your guarantee that "...Republicans will never see the White House again." I have no desire for our exchange to become contentious, so if you are trying to engage me in an argument, I respectfully decline.

  • Posted By: jbob44 @ 11/07/2008 1:19:20 AM

    It is dead wrong to say that the choice of Gov. Palin hurt McCain. What hurt the McCain ticket was the choice of McCain. Once that choice had been made, where could he go? Lieberman? Romney? Another rich, old, white guy? Fewer Americans would have voted for any other Republican ticket than voted for McCain/Palin.

    • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 11/08/2008 5:04:49 PM

      McCain thought America would 'love' Palin but he couldn't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

  • Posted By: joe 6pack @ 11/07/2008 1:38:21 PM

    One thing not being addressed is the possible effect of voter fraud. Another thing that can't be overlooked is Bush and his cronyism. That had to hurt the Republican Party.

    • Posted By: elizabethpaige @ 11/08/2008 4:36:47 PM

      Republicans voted twice for George W. Bush, now they are trying to 'distance' themselves from their responsiblity for the mess the nation and the next president face.

      Palin goaded the media: "I'm not going to Washington to seek your good opinion." She asked for it and they let her have it. And Tina Fey deserves the nation's highest honor for nailin' Palin for the hick she is.

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 11/07/2008 2:15:50 PM

      You are aware that Obama won by 6% of the popular vote, right?

      That's a lot of voter fraud. Amazing that NO poll watchers found it. Simply amazing.

  • Posted By: Dylan Rossi @ 11/08/2008 4:01:20 PM

    cindy jenkins2222 is essentially correct. McCain lost this election when he stuck to his principles and then quickly abandoned them. He wanted to tie Obama's hands to a campaign finance scheme that would have limited Obama, while allowing Republican 527s to paint him with Wright, Michelle and Ayers. Obama brilliantly saw the trick coming and abandoned his pledge to limit himself federal financing. That's wisdom.





  • Posted By: cindyjenkins2222 @ 11/07/2008 11:18:31 PM

    Obama was trailing after the conventions. It wasn't until the economy tanked that he regained the lead and kept it. The two main factors political scientists use to determine who will win are the state of the economy and the President's approval rating. Both were horrible and Obama couldn't close the deal. Mccain's two main mistakes were not pounding Wright and even Michelle (I have never been proud of my country) and taking the public financing. He couldn't compete. In 2012 the republicans will spend hundreds of millions like Obama did and level the playing field.

  • Posted By: lauramb87 @ 11/06/2008 2:04:27 PM

    Honestly, I have no idea why McCain didn't pick a more experienced woman running mate that shared his ideals. Is it because strong republican women senators that are more centralist, such as Olympia Snowe and Kay Bailey Hutchison, are pro-choice? I also don't understand why candidates think that running negative ads is a smart idea. To me, it makes a candidate look more like a fool. Don't tell me what your opponent is doing wrong - I want to know what you are going to do right. That's why I vote, after all. Hopefully this experience will teach both parties two things: 1. If you are going to appoint a woman, don't appoint a bimbo with little experience. Put a woman in that will empower all Americans, in addition to women. 2. Negative ads turn people off while positive ads turn them on.

    • Posted By: drenn73 @ 11/06/2008 3:41:23 PM

      Negative ads drive people away from the voting booths, those running for office know that. Historically the GOP do better when fewer people vote. This year the only difference was that the negative ads brought out more people to condemn them at the polls...

      • Posted By: LuisaInCA @ 11/07/2008 3:16:31 PM

        Actually, in the 2004 presidential race, 60.7% of the electorate voted. That was the highest percentage since 1968. Twelve million more people voted in 2004 than in 2000. And George W. Bush, a Republican, won in 2004. So it is absolutely false to say that, historically, Republicans tend to do better when fewer people vote.

        • Posted By: LuisaInCA @ 11/07/2008 3:25:06 PM

          And I found this information in about 30 seconds at wikipedia. Can't you do a little fact-checking before making such generalizations?

  • Posted By: roland thick @ 11/07/2008 1:36:30 PM

    I hope America never allows the GOP to raise its ugly head again. When Reagan was in office, drive-bys was at a record high, crack was introduced and bigots had a field day. The problem with Republicans is, they have theyre head so far up theyre "party", they cant see whats going on the rest of the world. The only way Republicans will ever make a comeback is if they stop thinking right and left, and start thinking backwards or forward. The REAL world just doesnt want to move backwards. If youre happy with old fashioned political b.s. move to Ga. and watch Fox all day.

  • Posted By: OldUncleTom @ 11/07/2008 1:10:15 PM

    Hopefully, when the GOP ( or its successor party, as there are no guarantees ) returns to the national stage, they will have figured out how to be "FOR" something, rather than "AGAINST" everything. I understand this comes harder for conservatives, but Reagan showed it can be done.

  • Posted By: Brooklyn Gurl @ 11/07/2008 11:33:15 AM

    Oh say can you see
    That GOD heard our plea
    For Obama to win
    All in favor say Yippee!

  • Posted By: Brooklyn Gurl @ 11/07/2008 11:32:47 AM

    Oh say can you see
    That GOD heard our plea
    For Obama to win
    All in favor say Yippee!

  • Posted By: carobe0007 @ 11/07/2008 10:34:11 AM

    It just goes to show you that if you have enough money, regardless where it comes from or how it was obtained, and know enough crooked people, you can be president! Hey, maybe the next time we can get someone from the Mafia to be elected, it would be about the same as what was elected this go around.

  • Posted By: Jimbpd2005 @ 11/06/2008 1:08:11 PM

    I followed this election probably closer than I ever have in the past. I'm 41, work in Law Enforcement, have 3 kids, an exwife, bills, a truck that gets 16 mpg, have friends in the military, and have tried my hardest to pay my bills and save money. After 8 years of watching Bush and his choices take my savings to $0, my friends touring Iraq for years, gas at $5 per gallon (while oil companies made record profits), hopes of my kids going to college disappear, my 401K being almost cut in half, and my country getting poorer and poorer....I had to stop believing in the Republican ideals. And don't get me wrong, I don't want to see my guns go away, my taxes raised, my country's safety diminish. But, damn, when do you stop and say "What is going on here?". Sad, but I think that is exactly what the country just did a few nights ago. I like McCain. I admire his patriotism and integrity. But his campaign completely missed the point and it felt like he was lost with what mattered to most Americans out here trying to survive and make this a better place for themselves and their families. I saw the Palin choice as just a tactic and not thought out idea to pander to Hillary's supporters. Maybe she's a great Republican and the media was unfair to her, but she also seemed confused, conceited, unaware of the facts, and not "Presidential". I lost my hope in McCain after that and after he stumbled through the financial crisis. I do have to admit that Obama reminds me of JFK or FDR. He gives me that hope of a better America that I just haven't had in the past 6 years or so. I look back to 9/11 and saw how the country united and came together. Then Bush did nothing with that but pile one mistake and blunder on top of another. I see hope in Obama that America can once again come together and overcome the challenges that face us today and in the future. I'm not sure if he'll be all that we hope, but I hope that he will at least give us that pride and confidence back that has been lost for so, so, so, long. And McCain just couldn't sell that same feeling or make me believe that we could rise above the situation and problems Bush has left us with. And from my own past, just believing and having hope is sometimes the most powerful force to bringing change and making things better. Time will tell.

    • Posted By: moni56 @ 11/07/2008 9:30:20 AM

      Thank you for your comment. You expressed the feelings of many, I believe

    • Posted By: nmbrldy69 @ 11/06/2008 2:27:24 PM

      Kudos to you - probably the least combative and most hopeful posting I've seen. I'm with you.

      • Posted By: Jimbpd2005 @ 11/06/2008 3:50:22 PM

        Thank you. Something else I thought of after hearing some people I know talk about this election. In the past I've heard (and thought myself) "My vote really isn't going to matter." And sad, but in the past that hopeless feeling has shown in the low turnout numbers and lack of interest and belief in our government. But as the record turnout and voters have shown this past Tuesday...hope and belief in something, and that one single vote multiplied by millions can make a difference. See.....hope and something to fight and believe in can make a change!

    • Posted By: Brooklyn Gurl @ 11/06/2008 3:45:50 PM

      Thank you for your comment. Excellent!

  • Posted By: fairfaxfarm @ 11/07/2008 9:09:48 AM

    This is just silly, re: the worst campaign ever. Why do you push the envelope so far? He received more electoral votes (174 with Mo) than Bush Sr./Clinton,, Carter/Mondale, Mondale/Ferraro, Dukakis/Bentsen, McGovern. And barely lost NC. What about Goldwater, Alf Landon? Do you want me to go on? The headline is inflammatory. Disclosure, I voted fin the past for McGovern, Ford, Reagan, Bush I, Bush II vs Gore, Kerry and McCain.
    You point out good reasons for losing, and there are plenty, but don't you think the economic meltdown, insolvent banks saved only by a change in accounting rules and gov loans, 2 wars, and being outspent about 8 to 1 overall, of which 70% of $630 million was spent by Obama in the swing states are the real reasons? If you look at it this way, the campaign was not great, but the fact that he did as well as he did is the real story. Re Clinton speaking about this election environment (paraphrase), wouldn't you get in to be president if a rolls royce drove up to take you there?

  • Posted By: fairfaxfarm @ 11/07/2008 9:06:46 AM

    This is just silly, re: the worst campaign ever. Why do you push the envelope so far? He received more electoral votes (174 with Mo) than Bush Sr./Clinton,, Carter/Mondale, Mondale/Ferraro, Dukakis/Bentsen, McGovern. And barely lost NC. Do you want me to go on? The headline is inflammatory. I guess I'm independent, but I voted Bush I, Bush II vs Gore, but I voted for Kerry and McCain.
    You point out good reasons for losing, and there are plenty, but don't you think the economic meltdown, insolvent banks saved only by a change in accounting rules and gov loans, 2 wars, and being outspent about 8 to 1 overall, of which 70% of $630 million was spent by Obama in the swing states are the real reasons? If you look at it this way, the campaign was not great, but the fact that he did as well as he did is the real story. Re Clinton speaking about this election environment (paraphrase), wouldn't you get in to be president if a rolls royce drove up to take you there?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse