Worst Campaign Ever?

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: tiredstudent @ 11/05/2008 12:45:56 PM

    McCain's chance was over when he chose his lame running mate.

  • Posted By: McCain_in_08 @ 11/05/2008 12:45:12 PM

    I have seen on some internet discussion groups where Democratic voters praised Obama for being truthful. Obama truthful?? Exactly when did this occur? Was he truthful to the union coal miners in West Virginia when he discussed supporting clean coal technologies? - or Was he truthful when speaking to the San Francisco Chronicle when he plainly stated that he would "bankrupt anyone trying to build a new coal plant in the U.S."?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hdi4onAQBWQ


    Not that the average voter ever heard much about this, or even heard basic facts about Obama's character and ideology from undisputed sources such as his own books. You might not base your vote on one or two sentences in a book, but how many Obama voters - who were outraged at his being called a ???socialist??? - knew that he had written in his own book "Dreams from my Father" of seeking out "marxist professors" at college or having a well known marxist ("Uncle Frank" - Frank Marshall Davis) as his childhood mentor? Don???t those FACTS about Obama potentially cast his ???spread the wealth??? comments in an entirely different light?

  • Posted By: cleroy @ 11/05/2008 12:45:07 PM

    YOur comments about the bad choices made are not reflective of a lot of people. If it had not been for Palin I would have likely voted independant or for Obama, although his experience greatly scards me, McCain did not present a lot of solutions to the problems but with his VP Pick I was sold on his team. In relation to optomism, the only way you could paint an optimistic picture would be to Lie. I hold more value in truth than made up lies to sell a "bill of goods"

  • Posted By: McCain_in_08 @ 11/05/2008 12:44:47 PM

    This was an election to test the power of the Media - and the candidate pre-ordained by the Media - starting in the Democratic Primaries against Hillary Clinton - won.

    Who lost? The American people.

    John McCain ran an honorable campaign, but when the playing field of media coverage and ill-gotten money is so far tilted that even Dan Rather - DAN RATHER OF ALL PEOPLE - feels that it is disgraceful, then that is pretty much all there is to say.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MNmswO7AFs


  • Posted By: csally01 @ 11/05/2008 11:35:22 AM

    Excellent analysis and quite true. It seemed that Senator McCaim brought Palin into his campaing it went down from there and his ads and campaigning got ugly and nasty. Sarah Pailn did not do anything but bring negativity to his campaign as well and I think that eventually turned a lot of people off.

    • Posted By: TDogg @ 11/05/2008 11:45:50 AM

      Mrs. Palin did not bring down the campaign, the liberal media did. There was plenty of negatives about Obama, yet they chose to ignore it all along their path to destroying Mrs. Palin because she was a real threat to Obama. The media made a big deal out of her daughter's pregnancy, her clothes, etc, and never promoted her stellar record. They didn't even bat an eye when Mrs. Obama spent over $400 for an afternoon snack of lobster, caviar, and wine on their tax money.

      • Posted By: LS MO @ 11/05/2008 12:44:45 PM

        The rumor about Michelle ordering lobster, etc., is simply not true. Vist snopes.com for the real story. Go Obama!

  • Posted By: An american nightmare = Obama @ 11/05/2008 12:05:52 PM

    Nothing went wrong with McCain, if Obomb was Republican, and McCain was Democratic. Obomb still would have won the election. So many stupid ingorant black people that have NEVER voted and know NOTHING about politics voted just BECAUSE he was black. End of Story

    • Posted By: mzzmo @ 11/05/2008 12:42:24 PM

      yeah, and i guess i'm one of those stupid black people who happens to have a masters degree you ignoramus

    • Posted By: Chigirl52 @ 11/05/2008 12:32:17 PM

      You obviously didn't read the news or follow the polls...and before you call anyone ignorant, learn to spell the word first!!! To correct you, blacks only made up 23% of the votes for Obama...61% of his votes came from whites, you dumb ass!!! Now who's stupid???

  • Posted By: KJ06 @ 11/05/2008 12:16:19 PM

    As an African American woman, I am deeply offended by the comment made that Obama won because "stupid ignorant black people" voted for him. I guarantee that I am more educated and definitely more intelligent than you especially given the fact that you seem to think Obama won off of the black vote alone. Barack Obama is a genuinely good person with the will, ability, and skill to lead this country. The fact that he is black is only icing on the cake for our race. Jessie Jackson ran in the past and didn't win. I wouldn't have voted for him b/c I don't think he would be right for the job. Only a narrow minded, hypocritical, uninformed person would assume that Obama won just because he is black. No black person would ever tell you that we have won anything just because we are black in a country where being black has always been looked at as a negative thing by whites and other races. I am proud of Barack Obama and his family. I am proud and honored to be black, and I hope ignorant, racist people like you crawl back into the hole that you were in before McCain and Palin coaxed you out of it. This nation needs and wants change...not the same old hatred and bigotry that you seem to embrace.

    • Posted By: nmbrldy69 @ 11/05/2008 12:42:11 PM

      KJ - no, I think it was rock that person came out from under. Last time I checked, I'm not black, and I voted for Obama. A lot of friends, also not black, voted for him, as well as absolutely intelligent, upstanding and beyond reproach black men and women I'm lucky enough to call friends. Anybody who believes this race was won BECAUSE of race doesn't have a clue, and is looking for an easy out, instead of taking responsbility for bad Republican campaigns coming on the heels of a lousy 8 years with a very expensive Republican in office.

  • Posted By: chelsea1955 @ 11/05/2008 12:42:02 PM

    I had really admired John McCain during the 2000 primaries, when he ran against Bush. He was a decorated veteran with a quick wit but the Bush/Rove team trashed him like a dog. I felt cheated FOR him. Running against Obama, however, he degenerated into a mean-spirited old man that would stop at nothing to win the election. And yes, the Palin creature was incredibly poor and gimicky pick. My cat has deeper thoughts than her. Obama will definitely be facing some challenges....

  • Posted By: cathycam @ 11/05/2008 12:41:13 PM

    Thankgod the right man won, Sarah Palin not only is unqualified she would set back womens rights decades, Can you imagine that woman head of your country if anything had happened to McCain. For a long time Americans have been viewed as warmongers, stop interferring in other peoples business and get your own house in order, the effects of american bad business decisions has spelt misery for people far beyond your shores. I can tell you know I already feel the world has a better chance of getting back on its feet now Obama is in, We need more young people in politics, fresh ideas, fresh energy, Don't count on our terrible un-elected prime minister, No one I know likes Gordon Brown, he is just like Bush, stupid and full of his own s---. (Obama supporter Scotland)

  • Posted By: dianlarkin @ 11/05/2008 12:05:11 PM

    to those on this site that feel that Obama is not about hard work....what is wrong with you?

    Obama's story is one of overcoming hurdle after hurdle after hurdle

    Obama's story is one of discipline -- mental and physical and spiritual -- do you think it is easy to get into and through HARVARD LAW SCHOOL? Let alone to be the EIC of the Harvard Law Review? Let alone to be the first black / multi-racial EIC of the Law Review -- and if you tell yoursleves he got elected b/c he was black, think again, the Harvard Law Review, then and now, is peopled certainly by some liberals but the mainstay is white highly conservative thinking.

    Why does anyone think that Obama is about anything other than hard work and pulling oneself up by one's own bootstraps?

    The Republicans have an incredible dishonesty that blinds them, makes them dangerous, and allows them, among other defects, to accuse othrers of what they and only they are guilty of --

    the golden parachutes for your morally and ethically criminal CEOs -- that $$ was earned? NOT

    • Posted By: vote4tom @ 11/05/2008 12:40:47 PM

      This might be the first thing you have said that makes any sense, but of course you do not extrapolate it out. Obama is, indeed, a self-made man thus proving that help is not needed from the "rich" or anyone else for one to succeed, rather, hard work and determination is all that is needed. Funny how a man who made it all on his own now wants to try and "help" everyone else get what he was able to get, on his own. It defies logic. Obama is an example of Republican idealism and, yet, he wants to abandon what made him who he is.

  • Posted By: sccostej01 @ 11/05/2008 12:40:31 PM

    Obama's victory does not come as a surprise. Everyone knew He was going to win this elections. Americans are defined with their beliefs. The republicans no longer have a sincere, honest criteria about what they want and where they are standing.Proof of that can be analized as follows: the anyone see Bush going around helping McCain with his campaign? of course NOT! Bush would had hurt the republican candidate worse than what Palin did.This is just one example of what I meant, when I said, the republcans do not have a sincere and honest criteria about what they really want, in order to benefit the American people. And from wherever he's at, Abe Lincoln must be as mad as hell... WHAT A SHAME! Santiago Coste, Dom. Rep.

  • Posted By: buytheplace @ 11/05/2008 12:27:54 PM

    I couldn't agree more. I've sent countless similar messages to the McCain campaign over the last month. I do think that this was the worst campaign that I've seen in my lifetime, 54 yrs.
    I don't agree that Mrs. Palin was a drag on the ticket. Her inexperience issue was a non issue. Mr. Obama has no experience either. Experience isn't an issue in our election process any longer. The one single issue is media attraction and Mrs Palin was certainly that. Our last 2 Democratic Presidents have now been media savvy candidates. They knew how to work the camera and the press. Let's face it. Mr. Obama is an empty suit. Has no experience and no credentials for the office. Yet, because he is telegenic and speaks well, he wins. Same thing with Bill Clinton, a media darling. That's all that is required to win in this media driven to win now. Until the Repubs figure out that they need media darlings, which Mrs. Palin is, they will continue to swim upstream against Democratic media babes.
    Mr. McCain also allowed himself to be tied to an unbelievably unpopular sitting President but simply refused to tie Mr. Obama to his own anvil around his neck, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Rev Farakkan and Tony Resko.
    He simply refused to do it. For that, he gave Mr. Obama a free pass to the White House.
    It was indeed a remarkably incompetent campaign strategy. If Mr. McCain didn't intend to run for the office with every tool at his disposal, he should have just stayed home.

    • Posted By: summer1216 @ 11/05/2008 12:40:28 PM

      Negative campaigns will probably not work any more. These "anvils" will not win elections because people, in droves, go to fact-checking sites to find out the truth. They find out that only some tenuous relationship exists, or how unlikely it was that the candidate ever heard one of those incindeary sermons, and return to issues that really matter. Also, fact-checking sites provide DOCUMENTATION for their claims, rather than using statements without context or leaving out necessary background. information

  • Posted By: Lindaseaside @ 11/05/2008 11:48:51 AM

    I am a registered Independent who voted for John McCain. I can honestly say that I have never been more disappointed at the outcome of an election - especially a presidential election.

    In my humble opinion, Barack Obama "bought" his victory. What does it say that when a candidate outspends his opponent by what - 3 to 1 - and yet he still had a tough fight on his hands. It tells you that had John McCain waged a better campaign and had broken his promise about campaign financing (as Obama did) that John McCain would be our president-elect.

    I will do my best to give Barack Obama the benefit of the doubt but I have concerns about his voting record (or lack thereof) which I believe speaks volumes to his inability to make hard decisions. Finally, I still wrestle with the kind of person who would ever - under any circumstances, associate with the likes of Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright. He was not a child when he developed relationships with these people. Clearly, he identified with them and did not ever speak out against them at ANY time prior to his candidacy.

    • Posted By: Brooklyn Gurl @ 11/05/2008 11:58:22 AM

      Hey Lindaseaside - It is what it is. I look forward to the change because it is coming. Finally someone with some brilliance in the White House and not someone who is brilliantless. I will volunteer to help George Bush and his family pack their bags and move back to Texas. I can't imagine anyone voting for McCain. I mean who would ever - under any circumstances associate with the likes of George Bush and Dick Chaney. McCain was not a child when he developed relationships with these people. Clearly McCain identified with them and did not ever speak out against them at ANY time prior to his candidacy.

      • Posted By: notjustamom @ 11/05/2008 12:39:20 PM

        brilliantless? you people scare me.

    • Posted By: tempic @ 11/05/2008 12:27:03 PM

      Lindaseaside. Thank you.
      I was appalled at the Media. The sons of America's heartland will have difficulty raising their hand in a salute to their new Commander in Chief.

  • Posted By: AnnieP. @ 11/05/2008 12:38:51 PM

    I find it amusing that democrats who whined, and came up with every rude and vulgar comment they could about the "evil right" are now saying that people who voted for McCain should just shut up and be proud of their country.......excuse me? We put up with eight years of acid toned commentary. You think people are going to forget that? You set the bar guys, and it was awful and nastier than I could ever believe people could be. Your lack of respect was to the absurd degree....now you're going to have to swim in it.

  • Posted By: PS Alaska @ 11/05/2008 12:35:57 PM

    Palin was the problem - she is without substance. They had to hide her and for weeks and it became about her gaffes and scandals. She is a cross between Bush and Bill Clinton holding on to the worst traits of each - shallowness of thought and extrordinarily self absorbed.

    • Posted By: SavethisCountry @ 11/05/2008 12:38:33 PM

      Add Chenman to the list. She felt the power was more than it really is.

  • Posted By: LastRealAmerican @ 11/05/2008 12:23:28 PM

    This over the top, one-sided, biased strory illustrates one of McCain's greatest problems - the press was in the tank for Obama - nothing he did or said was wrong, while nothing McCain did or said was right.

    McCain lost because he was swimming upsteam against the tide of history with the nation wanting to be able to elect a black; he was swimming with the dead weight of George W. on his back., and when he started to pull close, the economy and the his own party's President threw him the 500 pound anchor of a bailout of Wall Street fat cats and the panic of a possible worldwide depression - no wonder he sank.

    • Posted By: missconservative @ 11/05/2008 12:38:32 PM

      Oh yeah. LastRealAmerican, blame it all on the liberal media with a bias towards Obama. McCain's losing and pathetic campaign had nothing to do with the fact that his VP pick claimed that her foreign policy experience included the fact that she could see Russia from her house, the fact that she didn't know any other Supreme Court decisions that bothered her other than Roe v. Wade, the fact that she couldn't pull the name of ANY newspaper out of her head, even if she had lied, not to mention the fact that she DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF A VICE-PRESIDENT!!!! You're right, the liberal media was totally responsible for that. And I guess the media was also responsible for the condescending remarks by Palin and Giuliani about community organizers. The Obama campaign surely community organized right around their Republican a*#ses! And the liberal media was also responsible for the crowd shouting "terrorist" and "kill him" when the McCain campaign started saying that Obama "palls around with terrorists." Those sleazy campaigns is exactly what led to Obama raising $150 million in one month. Everytime a supporter heard those comments, they put in another donation to Obama. But you're right, LastRealAmerican, I won't argue with you. You have me totally convinced. The bias of a media in the tank for Obama is what did McCain and Palin in!!!!!

  • Posted By: Lilegend @ 11/05/2008 12:37:26 PM

    American nightmare - you seem to forget that your beloved Bush was a coke head. Sorry to tell you this but times have changed. The percentage of teens that has NOT tried one drug in their life is getting smaller and smaller compared to when you were growing up. It's a fact and it's reality. Gee I wonder why the republicans allowed all the drugs to enter the country? Same thing goes for sex. Teens are more likely to have sex at a younger age than when you were a teen. As we see by your beloved Palin who praises teen pregnancy and statutory rape. I bet back in your day if your little sister, cousin or whomever got pregnant and dropped out of school at 16, your parents or family would have locked that boy up for statutory rape- but not your beloved Palin and McCain. They praised it and even brought the criminal on stage. I see the kind of Country you were banking on. Oh well, you'll live. You play dirty, you lose - exhibit A-Democrats win - check mate old timer.

  • Posted By: NY_in_ATL @ 11/05/2008 12:17:35 PM

    Re: this comment below:

    Comment: If republicans are now the minority, I will be quitting my job and waiting for my check at the mailbox. Take from the rich and give to the poor just as you promised obama.

    First and foremost, you're an idiot!!! Pick up a book and/or a newspaper and educate yourself! IF (and only IF) you are lucky enough to make over $250K per year, then yes he SHOULD take more from you to give to someone like me: a single mom STRUGGLING to pay for her child's daycare and to put food on the table. No I am not on welfare or any kind of goverment assistand. In fact, I work full time and possess both a bachelors degree and an MBA!!! So my suggestion for you tdogg is go out to some charity events and do volunteering, walk for a cause, learn to care for others besides yourself!!

    Secondly, if you were happy with the way Bush ran office and are happy with the current economy....I have only 1 question: you DO know we are talking about the United States of America right?

    New blood is good. New voice, new ideas, new strategies, new country and overall a new outlook. I NOW HAVE HOPE!!!!

    • Posted By: nmbrldy69 @ 11/05/2008 12:37:11 PM

      NY - I am with you 100%. I didn't want a wealthy, 72 year-old man who's never had to worry about healthcare coverage and doesn't even know the extent of his assets sitting in an office and making decisions that affect me financially.

      Change, and hope, is here. I can't wait, and neither can the world.

  • Posted By: hoosierdrummer @ 11/05/2008 12:36:43 PM

    To me the choice was the lessor of 2 evils. the 2 party system needs to allow other players. Obama ran a brilliant campaign and was on target except for maybe the joe the plumber issue. Obama ran center slightly left although his record is extremely liberal. if he unites, lowers taxes and allows free enterprise, ergo clinton, we should be just fine. as a conservative i would be slightly happier has McCain won but he is not a true conservative. as always in any election it is the economy stupid. Palin wasn't a negative factor and she will be a star of the party in the future but if the GOP doesn't return to Reaganomics, remain optomistic and look to the future conservatives will be shut out for quite some time. Obama will be OK if he doesn't allow the Pelosis and Reids of the party to pull him further left than he ran his campaign. lastly, it is distressing to see such hatred an negativity. we on the right lost, lets figure out how to work together with this administration and if it turns out the electorate made an error lets put together a better strategy for the next race. conservatism and traditional values aren't dead and this isn't a mandate for extreme left liberalism either. Gob be with you all.

  • Posted By: wilmcnam @ 11/05/2008 12:36:30 PM

    McCain misspoke too many times. Once he cited 'Fannie Mae & Freddie Mae'. Another time he meant to say 'Mr. Obama, you believe in too much government' - it came out ' Mr. Government you believe in too much, i mean, Mr Obama ..." you get the idea. I think he is tired.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse