SPONSORED BY:

Cabinet Makers

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

State Department | Personnel Matters
By Lawrence Eagleburger

Former US Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger testifies before the Senate Foreign Relation Committee's International Operations and Organizations, Democracy and Human Rights Subcommittee hearing on Holocaust Era Insurance Restitution on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on May 6, 2008.

From the moment the President announces his intention to name you Secretary of State you will know little peace. You will be deluged by hundreds of your "best friends." Most will be job seekers while some will earnestly tell you what your priorities should be. Do not let the former in the door and ignore the latter.

If you intend to run the Department of State instead of being run by it, you will begin your sojourn by recognizing that people will be a key to your future success or failure. Decide on people before you do anything else—once in office responding to events will consume your every wakening hour. State has more senior level officers for its size than any other department, all requiring Senate confirmation. It will take several months before all these appointees are in place; it would behoove you to have your list of nominees ready to go to the Senate shortly after the inauguration. The fly in the ointment, however, could be how you and the President sort out his involvement in the process. I can assure you that he will have a list. That is his right. However, you have an obligation to lead a Department that will loyally carry out the President's policies. Your confidence in those below you will be a vital part of assuring an effective Department.

There is no easy answer to this conundrum, since so much depends on the President's personality and involvement in foreign affairs. The best I can suggest is what would amount to a veto if you decide that you cannot work with the people he wants. There is one person you must insist be yours to selectthe Deputy Secretary. This position should go to someone you could consider your alter-egosomeone ready to fill in for you when you are otherwise occupied.

I was an assistant to Henry Kissinger when President Nixon named him Secretary, to replace William Rogers. The Deputy Secretary at the time was a gentleman who had expected to be named Secretary on Roger's departure. The new Secretary and the old Deputy had, as you might imagine, a less than wholesome relationship—which often led to mixed signals to subordinates. Kissinger, not exactly a patient man, had a new Deputy in short order, someone he personally selected and insisted the President appoint. Are you ready to be as hard-nosed? Again, much will depend on the President himself. Unless he is willing to let you have your say, I believe you should tell the President that, regretfully, you cannot accept his job offer.

This is strong medicine, but otherwise you may soon find that the President is making decisions on substantive matters without your involvement. It has happened numerous times. Be a wet washcloth on personnel matters and you invite similar treatment on more substantive issues.

Many former Secretaries have fallen into this trap. They were so enamored with the high office and its perks that they decided to grin and bear it. I know of one who was unhappy with his treatment but nonetheless wanted to stay on through the President's second term. After he was put aside, he waited for an opportunity for revenge and endorsed his party's Presidential opponent some years later. This brings me to my final point: loyalty to your President—so long as he stays within the law—is your best guarantee of success.
—Lawrence S. Eagleburger served as Secretary of State under George H.W. Bush

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Tan Boon Tee @ 01/20/2009 9:23:08 PM

    This is rather strange. One would have expected things would look definitely more positive and people in a better mood on the very day of the inauguration of a new president of the US.

    Sadly, that is not the exact scenario. The world stock markets dip into the negative territory, and unbelievably Dow falls more than 300 points (4%) to close below the 8k mark. This does not augur well for the global economy, reflecting badly on the dire state-of-affairs of the US economy in particular.

    One explanation for the lackluster performance could be because consumers may not have that much confidence in the new administration team in bringing the bashed financial institutions back to normal that soon. If that is the case, there is no need to talk big about CHANGE and end up offering false promises.

    In short, just quietly and diligently do the necessary work to bring about the correct result via right actions. Show the world Washington CAN and will.
    (Tan Boon Tee, btt1943@yahoo.com)

  • Posted By: Tan Boon Tee @ 01/17/2009 11:32:12 PM

    Oh yes, a new admin means a new upheaval.

    Mrs. Clinton has been confirmed as the Secretary of State. Was this not a covert agreement made when she threw her support whole-heartedly to her arch rival after losing out in the Democrat nomination?

    Clinton has been a person of strong determination. It will be almost impossible for others to change her idea once she has sat firmly on it, not even the president. And that is the naughty part of it. Her new post makes her practically the most powerful diplomat in the US as well as the world, her words count.

    What if she adamantly refuses to heed her superior???s advice and toe her own line, thinking that she is always in the right (like before)? Well, no prize for guessing it right ??? the White House will be thrown into internal squabbles -- unless of course, Obama gives way quietly if not surreptitiously.

    Chapter I, Act I of the new era of CHANGE, will soon begin.
    (Tan Boon Tee)

  • Posted By: bob_hall27 @ 12/02/2008 11:54:40 PM

    All He has picked is the biggest marxist power hungry thugs he could find

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now