SPONSORED BY:

Cabinet Makers

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

National-Security Adviser | Continuity Is Key
By Brent Scowcroft

Former National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 1, 2007, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing to study the remaining options in Iraq.

Transitions are interesting, and no single one is typical because they're all different. They depend on whether it's a transition not only of administration but also among parties. It depends on the nature of the president and the nature of the campaign. One of the most difficult parts for any transition will be the national-security framework, especially dealing with the National Security Council. The first time I was transitioned out, I was kind of appalled at the notion. On Inauguration Day, movers came and all the safes were locked and moved out. All the people walked out and closed the doors. A new administration then came into empty offices. I remember thinking, "What a way to run a system." Sadly, that's still the way they run it.

The easiest thing is when you inherit the position from someone you can work with, like I did with Colin Powell in 1989. The hardest will be one like the one ahead. This transition will be very complicated, mainly in terms of the financial crisis. President Bush is going to have a conference in the middle of November with all the finance ministers of the G8. He's the president, yes, but he's not going to implement anything that comes from that meeting. The question will be what he does for the president-elect. There are still more tough decisions the president will make; many, if not all of them, will have an impact on the next president.

To whoever takes over as national-security adviser, I would say this: when you get there, you should ask for a list of the status of any ongoing discussions with any foreign country. That has to come directly from the office of the incumbent. Then I would follow up on that with anything that looks like it needs papers. To get anything after the fact means an enormous process involving legal government requests. To do it beforehand would mitigate that process.

History has shown that the president meets with his secretary of state maybe once a week. But he meets with the national-security adviser almost once a day. That person has to represent the views of many different cabinet members honestly and accurately to the president. If he or she doesn't, and there's not that trust, the system will break down. But the challenge is also to be the national-security adviser to the president, unassociated with the affiliation with any other department bureaucracies. Maintaining those separately is very complicated. If it's done well, you have a smoothly functioning system. If not, you'll have deadlock.
Brent Scowcroft was national-security adviser under Presidents Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush

© 2008

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Tan Boon Tee @ 01/20/2009 9:23:08 PM

    This is rather strange. One would have expected things would look definitely more positive and people in a better mood on the very day of the inauguration of a new president of the US.

    Sadly, that is not the exact scenario. The world stock markets dip into the negative territory, and unbelievably Dow falls more than 300 points (4%) to close below the 8k mark. This does not augur well for the global economy, reflecting badly on the dire state-of-affairs of the US economy in particular.

    One explanation for the lackluster performance could be because consumers may not have that much confidence in the new administration team in bringing the bashed financial institutions back to normal that soon. If that is the case, there is no need to talk big about CHANGE and end up offering false promises.

    In short, just quietly and diligently do the necessary work to bring about the correct result via right actions. Show the world Washington CAN and will.
    (Tan Boon Tee, btt1943@yahoo.com)

  • Posted By: Tan Boon Tee @ 01/17/2009 11:32:12 PM

    Oh yes, a new admin means a new upheaval.

    Mrs. Clinton has been confirmed as the Secretary of State. Was this not a covert agreement made when she threw her support whole-heartedly to her arch rival after losing out in the Democrat nomination?

    Clinton has been a person of strong determination. It will be almost impossible for others to change her idea once she has sat firmly on it, not even the president. And that is the naughty part of it. Her new post makes her practically the most powerful diplomat in the US as well as the world, her words count.

    What if she adamantly refuses to heed her superior???s advice and toe her own line, thinking that she is always in the right (like before)? Well, no prize for guessing it right ??? the White House will be thrown into internal squabbles -- unless of course, Obama gives way quietly if not surreptitiously.

    Chapter I, Act I of the new era of CHANGE, will soon begin.
    (Tan Boon Tee)

  • Posted By: bob_hall27 @ 12/02/2008 11:54:40 PM

    All He has picked is the biggest marxist power hungry thugs he could find

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now