Handover Horror Stories

The author of this article failed to note that it cost the American tax payer, over $200,000 to do the GAO report after the Clinton-to-Bush administration. The GAO rightly noted that they did not know WHO did the damage. IE It very well could have been the new Bushies looking to slander the outgoing regime. Also, the Clinton regime, back in 1993 had made similar claims abiout the HW Bush administration.

I told a young woman yesterday who said she had been an enthusiastic supporter of Obama, that he is not who she thinks he is. I said, "he wants to invade and occupy Afghanistan with 90,000 troops." She said bluntly, "he does not want to invade and occupy Afghanistan." I looked at her in the eye and said, "Do you believe he intends to?" She said, "No, that is not what we campaigned for." I said, I believe that certainly.

There are two versions of Obama, the media hyped glossing over the bad reality of him, with eager pretense as if that will work, and the Obama version which is a truthtelling hypocrit, using claims of strong catch words of :"peace" when he wants to "occupy" Afghanistan and, yes, he HAS SAID he wants 90,000 troops and he is hypocritical because NO COUNTRY will ever allow "occupation" with 90,000 troops. Moreover, in the beginning of his campaign he threatened Pakistan's Mushareff with a challenge that was not to Mushareff's face but to a supposed war enthusiastic supporting BUSH audience, but the public is not who they ought to be, they are obviously able to say Heil Obama as easily as Hitler. I would not. Not all did in Germany either. The United Nations has called for a cease fire in Gaza. THE MEDIA delivers Obama's hypocrisy. When a man talked with me, and answered my accusation that Obama has no sense of courage or honor or proper diplomacy when he made that statement, a second Obama enthusiast (aka believer in the two party opposition that is a supposed contrast that does not require voters to think about the candidate, and to believe the media forced two party supposed contrast as if there is any difference), a clear Democrat Party guy, said, "Oh, he's just young and naive! He doesn't mean it." I looked at him and said, " but you will vote for someone who you think doesn't mean what he says?" He thinks Obamas statements are innocent. I do not. I voted for honor and upholding democracy and peace for proper policy that nets both a budget on track and peace policy by someone who knows the difference between a gesture of assistance to a country who is troubled by terrorists and a gesture of more terror on top of what is already Being nice when there is every reason to be nice, is diplomacy. The Middle East deserves "nice" not threats of obliterators in the making. Crack the Whip? THAT MEANS IMPEACH BUSH AND PUT OBAMA ON NOTICE FOR HIS CONFLICTING AND ILLEGAL CLAIMS. PEOPLE VOTED FOR THE MEDIA LIES without substance: hope, change, and peace. Obama doesn't offer those any more than healthcare. NADER did. The media didn't what that reality. There was a real candidate not being allowed in front where he belonged. Nader. OBAMA IS RED INK, RED BLOOD AND INCREASED WEAPONS AND THREATS. I do know certainly that is NOT who the young woman campaigned for. She should have been on the Nader campaign!

If he has no such intentions, already showing, in my opinion, is TREASON the correct appraisal of the matter at hand? And, whose TREASON is it, obviously he owns responsibiliity for HIS ACTIONS, certainly, and his WORDS. The public owns responsibility for WATCHING and not objecting and worse, VOTING FOR a "KING" which is NOT our CONSTITUTION. Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Rep. John Conyers, knows this, as well as his partner in objecting, author of "Warrior King: The Case to Impeach George W. Bush" by John Bonifaz, Esq. a Boston Private Attorney. It is a brief, succinct, and well written book available in paperback, and prefaced by John Conyers, Esq. House of Representatives. There is a HUGE ACTIVIST PEACE MOVEMENT in this country and the press considers them :"outside" their duty, obviously, as to coverage, only the PROTESTS when in large numbers are given coverage, as if they do not belong as part of the real picture, the actual facts and themes of what we object to as required taken seriously for proper upholding of a free democracy with a government worthy of respect at home and abroad, and by our literal neighbors in North America and South America. We in the peace movement utterly depise Bush and the majority of voters were supposed to have the opportunity to see the full slate of agenda driven candidates who are not corrupt, who offer peace policy as reality.

FOR THE NEW PRESIDENT (to me, it should be a result of a REQUIRED honest election where the public was INFORMED of the ENTIRE SLATE OF OPPOSITION AGAINST INCUMBENTS and incompetence promoiting by tyranny of a resistant press who refuses democracy should not be allowed, and a candidate who tries to take such a villain's trophy against the Constitution and the democracy and everything it stands for, should be SEEN by the PUBLIC for WHO he is...a villain, not a winner) ...But here is the text of the OATH of OFFICE that obviously Obama is intending to claim his right to take, but I see nothing to support honesty whatsoever, and allowing him to take it is allowing offense against the Constitution and Democracy, already seen in 2000, 2004, and 2008 election coverage by a media railroading of corruption against public interest which is protected by the Constitution, but the attorneys who have the knowledge and ability to pick up the proper challenge are obviously NOT DOING ANYTHING unless they have been censored by the press against the people...John Conyers' IMPEACHMENT has been, clearly! Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

No change, no democracy 89% saying OFF TRACK was not offered the remedy due. SIX not TWO and the BEST is supposed to win and Nader's ideals, "unbowed" were OWED the public for his TRACK RECORD to prove WHAT MERITS CAN DO versus Bush offensives not wanted at 89% if that poll is accurate, as to during September 2007, asked, "is the nation off track or on track?" 89% said....you know what they said. And, the results of a grade for Bush yesterday showed a huge majority responding F. The media is resistant to democracy ON TRACK at an unconscionable level of unreal public allowance and observer or endorser voting status. I voted for NADER and I say the democratic challenge is the ONLY valid way to offer U.S. Constitutional REQUIRED INFORMED VOTING for the PEOPLE to rule against corporate corrupt tyranny by incumbents who refuse to show any democratic respect for the U.S. Constitution and the safety and freedoms it protects with legal sound framework as amended.

Bush and Laura have more class than these morons

I am sure we won't have any difficulties when Obama takes over in January. After all, as a three year Senator, and author or co-author of too many bills to mention, Obama is an expert on the inner workings of Washington politics. With Father Biden holding his hand, Obama and his team will be able to hit the ground running, setting up shop in record time and have all of our crisises fixed by_

Sorry, I threw up a little in my mouth on that...

If Obama and Biden weren't governemnt insiders, they might deserve a break. But Biden has been cooking this mess for 30 years, and Obama has been helping to stir the pot for the past 3. They should not get, nor do they deserve, any slack. And going back to the do-nothing Clinton administration is only going to make things worse...

Has anyone seen my Obama check? It hasn't come in the mail yet.

Actually, it was only $675.00 in damage during Clinton. lol And talk about mushrooms? Czeck-out
the NASDAQ freindly taser sales of recent. Just in time to hold back the UAW's when they get
shut out of the lithium-ion battery cars and the "Genepax" type cars. Remember GM's EV-1?
I say that the Unions that helped put Obama in place get double-crossed, yes?

Newsweek forgot to mention "me"! lol And talk about handovers! FDR handed the Federal Governmnent
as well as our courtrooms over to the Central Banks of Europe some 10 trillion and counting dollars
ago. Q. What will Obama handover to the U.N. (like? wut's left) in the name of a pre-packaged
re-structure plan. The US Guv is holding the Fan/Fred bag amongst rising un-employment. hmm!

What did Bush Lie about I hear that all the time and the only thing that keeps getting repeated is that he lied about WMD's which everyone belived Hussien had including every democrat in the Clinton administration and congress. If Clinton had not dismantled our ground intelligence service we may have known ahead of time that he moved it all secretly to Syria which is what happened and there would not have been a war.