Handover Horror Stories

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

1980-81
President-elect Ronald Reagan assembled his transition team and chose Teamster bigwig Jackie Presser as a labor adviser. The problem: Presser had alleged Mafia contacts, and was a target of a Department of Labor malfeasance lawsuit. Reagan had courted the Teamster endorsement during the campaign (which he got—both in 1980 and 1984). When the news broke, administration officials denied knowledge of Presser's more nefarious connections and rejected the notion his advice would compromise any federal investigation into Teamster corruption. In ensuing days, more bad news surfaced: police witnesses testified that Presser made loans from Teamster pension funds to various organized-crime families. Though Presser denied any ties to organized crime, calls for his resignation grew louder; eventually, Reagan spokesman (and soon-to-be press secretary) James Brady said the Teamster boss's job had ended. However, the Associated Press quoted spokesman Larry Speakes as saying that Presser "may be called on" for "some continuing role." Presser, a Jimmy Hoffa protégé who had previously sought an audience with President Jimmy Carter, was elected president of the Teamsters in 1983.

1976-77
Theodore Sorensen was nominated to head the CIA by newly elected President Carter in 1976. The choice drew immediate fire from the right. Sorensen was accused of taking classified material during his time as a Kennedy adviser, criticized for having been a conscientious objector during World War II and blasted for his law firm's client roster's including foreign governments. Ideology also played a part. Sorensen was an old-school liberal who had some very definite ideas on reorganizing the agency, including reining in covert operations. Even though Democrats controlled the Senate, Sorensen could not withstand the onslaught. He pulled his nomination in front of the Senate committee, saying, "A substantial portion of the U.S. Senate and the intelligence community is not yet ready to accept as director of Central Intelligence an outsider who believes as I believe." Carter, perhaps afraid of the embarrassment of such an early rejection, decided to cut his losses; he did not forcefully back Sorensen, nor did he ask outright for his withdrawal.

1932-33
For the first 150 years of the presidency, the transition took place between November and the Inauguration in early March, primarily to account for slow travel time. But as communication and transportation improved, Inauguration Day stayed the same, leaving a lame-duck administration especially lame for four months.

In '32 Herbert Hoover was the lame duck, and for months Franklin Roosevelt distanced himself from all things Hoover—at the time an expedient maneuver, but one that may well have cost the country. Hoover had set in motion government plans to reverse the economic crisis, hoping the appearance of solidarity between the actual and incoming administrations would be a financial tonic. But he was already seen as politically toxic, and Roosevelt had won by steering clear of him. The Democrat rejected Hoover's plea to address the European end of the crisis, calling the war-debt issue the Republican's "baby." In January and February 1933, banks were failing en masse and Roosevelt-Hoover meetings were fruitless standoffs—described by historian Herbert Feis as a "naval engagement on a foggy night between two opposed fleets … the proponents were shooting at shadows and hitting air." So who gets the blame for the depression? Historians have quarreled over the question, but Hoover has borne most of the blame. The economic inertia during the long, contentious winter of 1932-33 did not help. Ironically, the 20th Amendment shortening the transition time to 11 weeks was ratified in late January, but didn't go into practical effect until 1937.

1924-25
In 1925, Calvin Coolidge nominated Charles B. Warren, a former ambassador and businessman, to be his attorney general. The Senate rejected Warren for his interest in the "sugar trust"—a conglomerate of sugar companies that had been investigated by Congress. In the early 20th century, Warren had been instrumental in consolidating smaller Michigan refineries and later became president of the resulting conglomerate. Missouri Sen. James A. Reed was particularly hostile to the idea of Warren's appointment. "I trust there are enough [senators] left to vote against delivering the Department of Justice into the hands of the sugar trust," he said in an impassioned speech on the Senate floor. "Warren is owned in advance." Congress was especially sensitive to cabinet members with backdoor connections after the bribery scandals of the Harding presidency. Warren was rejected 41-39. Upon hearing the news, Coolidge stubbornly resubmitted Warren's name, saying in a statement that he hoped "the unbroken practice of three generations of permitting the president to choose his own cabinet will not be changed." The Senate, its sovereignty challenged, rejected Warren again.

1829
In the first months of 1829, Andrew Jackson supporters from far and wide made their way to the Capital for the Inauguration. Washington was captivated by the Democratic revolution, but the hero of New Orleans kept mainly out of sight. His wife had died in December (after a nasty campaign that sullied her reputation) and for most of the transition, Jackson was in mourning, secluded in his quarters at Gadsby's Hotel and only receiving visitors for three hours a day. A huge crowd assembled for the Inauguration, then flowed toward the White House. Jackson had opened the grounds to all his well wishers—who quickly became an unruly mob in the overcrowded reception room. Many of the people—penned in, hot and liquored up—began to fight or faint. Aides had to form a human ring around the gaunt president to avoid his being crushed. Opened windows provided the only escape route, but the fracas spilled out; aides used ice cream and wine to try to lure the masses outside. Margaret Bayard Smith, a lady of Washington society, wrote of the scene: "Ladies and gentlemen only had been expected at this Levee, not the people en masse. But it was the People's day, and the People's President and the People would rule."

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution
Al Gore's Climate-Change Evolution

Using emotion to convince people to change.

Heaven Can Wait
Heaven Can Wait

A new book promises proof of eternal life.

The World's Biggest Foods
The World's Biggest Foods

Monster edibles from around America.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: mikep007 @ 01/30/2009 6:41:32 AM

    The author of this article failed to note that it cost the American tax payer, over $200,000 to do the GAO report after the Clinton-to-Bush administration. The GAO rightly noted that they did not know WHO did the damage. IE It very well could have been the new Bushies looking to slander the outgoing regime. Also, the Clinton regime, back in 1993 had made similar claims abiout the HW Bush administration.

  • Posted By: ellisliza @ 01/16/2009 4:11:57 PM

    I told a young woman yesterday who said she had been an enthusiastic supporter of Obama, that he is not who she thinks he is. I said, "he wants to invade and occupy Afghanistan with 90,000 troops." She said bluntly, "he does not want to invade and occupy Afghanistan." I looked at her in the eye and said, "Do you believe he intends to?" She said, "No, that is not what we campaigned for." I said, I believe that certainly.

    There are two versions of Obama, the media hyped glossing over the bad reality of him, with eager pretense as if that will work, and the Obama version which is a truthtelling hypocrit, using claims of strong catch words of :"peace" when he wants to "occupy" Afghanistan and, yes, he HAS SAID he wants 90,000 troops and he is hypocritical because NO COUNTRY will ever allow "occupation" with 90,000 troops. Moreover, in the beginning of his campaign he threatened Pakistan's Mushareff with a challenge that was not to Mushareff's face but to a supposed war enthusiastic supporting BUSH audience, but the public is not who they ought to be, they are obviously able to say Heil Obama as easily as Hitler. I would not. Not all did in Germany either. The United Nations has called for a cease fire in Gaza. THE MEDIA delivers Obama's hypocrisy. When a man talked with me, and answered my accusation that Obama has no sense of courage or honor or proper diplomacy when he made that statement, a second Obama enthusiast (aka believer in the two party opposition that is a supposed contrast that does not require voters to think about the candidate, and to believe the media forced two party supposed contrast as if there is any difference), a clear Democrat Party guy, said, "Oh, he's just young and naive! He doesn't mean it." I looked at him and said, " but you will vote for someone who you think doesn't mean what he says?" He thinks Obamas statements are innocent. I do not. I voted for honor and upholding democracy and peace for proper policy that nets both a budget on track and peace policy by someone who knows the difference between a gesture of assistance to a country who is troubled by terrorists and a gesture of more terror on top of what is already Being nice when there is every reason to be nice, is diplomacy. The Middle East deserves "nice" not threats of obliterators in the making. Crack the Whip? THAT MEANS IMPEACH BUSH AND PUT OBAMA ON NOTICE FOR HIS CONFLICTING AND ILLEGAL CLAIMS. PEOPLE VOTED FOR THE MEDIA LIES without substance: hope, change, and peace. Obama doesn't offer those any more than healthcare. NADER did. The media didn't what that reality. There was a real candidate not being allowed in front where he belonged. Nader. OBAMA IS RED INK, RED BLOOD AND INCREASED WEAPONS AND THREATS. I do know certainly that is NOT who the young woman campaigned for. She should have been on the Nader campaign!

  • Posted By: ellisliza @ 01/16/2009 12:26:52 PM

    If he has no such intentions, already showing, in my opinion, is TREASON the correct appraisal of the matter at hand? And, whose TREASON is it, obviously he owns responsibiliity for HIS ACTIONS, certainly, and his WORDS. The public owns responsibility for WATCHING and not objecting and worse, VOTING FOR a "KING" which is NOT our CONSTITUTION. Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Rep. John Conyers, knows this, as well as his partner in objecting, author of "Warrior King: The Case to Impeach George W. Bush" by John Bonifaz, Esq. a Boston Private Attorney. It is a brief, succinct, and well written book available in paperback, and prefaced by John Conyers, Esq. House of Representatives. There is a HUGE ACTIVIST PEACE MOVEMENT in this country and the press considers them :"outside" their duty, obviously, as to coverage, only the PROTESTS when in large numbers are given coverage, as if they do not belong as part of the real picture, the actual facts and themes of what we object to as required taken seriously for proper upholding of a free democracy with a government worthy of respect at home and abroad, and by our literal neighbors in North America and South America. We in the peace movement utterly depise Bush and the majority of voters were supposed to have the opportunity to see the full slate of agenda driven candidates who are not corrupt, who offer peace policy as reality.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
Newsweek Exclusive
Secrets of the 2008 Campaign

This is a seven-part in-depth look behind the scenes of the campaign, consisting of exclusive reporting from the McCain and Obama camps assembled by a special team of journalists who were granted year-long access on the condition that none of their findings appear until after Election Day.