A Post-Evangelical America

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: The_Atheist @ 11/07/2008 10:10:36 AM

    The world would be a far better place if people would stop trying to impose their religious agenda on those who do not agree with them. This is why their is so much violence on earth.....everybody thinks that their religion is the right one, but nobody can back it up with evidence. I honestly think that people are afraid to think for themselves, and to venture away from what they were taught as children. This lack of intellect from the majority of people (especially those who actually believe those poorly written chain e-mails stating that Obama is the anti-christ) is a sad reflection on the entire human race.

    • Posted By: Believer til the end @ 11/07/2008 12:00:02 PM

      I apologize for my pot shot. I was at a loss of words when I read the Atheist believes the religious people have everything to do with the violence in the world. I believe we would be better off if we put God first in our lives. We are nothing without him.

      • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 8:02:10 PM

        That's YOUR belief. Freethinkers would tend to agree that the world would be a better place over all without ANY religious influence. Religion = a tool to control the masses with misinformation, superstition, guilt, fear and threat of eternal damnation. Society doesn't need that ... it's a way to keep people weak and oppressed.

        • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 11/12/2008 2:35:32 PM

          "Freethinkers would tend to agree that the world would be a better place over all without ANY religious influence. "

          Nonsense. Freethinkers think everyone should have their own religious beliefs (or lack thereof) without being bothered by evangelist freaks, religious or otherwise.

    • Posted By: Believer til the end @ 11/07/2008 11:17:00 AM

      You are truly an idiot.

      • Posted By: The_Atheist @ 11/07/2008 11:46:10 AM

        Coming from someone with your intellectual capacity, I have no choice but to consider that the highest form of praise I could ever hope for.

      • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 11/07/2008 11:38:29 AM

        OK, Believer - rather than just taking your little potshot and running, support your position. Show us some evidence - make a case for WHY The_Atheist is "an idiot." Because he doesn't just believe blindly when he's told to? Though he is too diplomatic to say so, I will wager he thinks you're an idiot. It's just that, if put to his proof, he would be able to tell you why.

  • Posted By: Mirabhai @ 11/10/2008 6:39:53 AM

    One thing that the polls don't seem to clarify is the distinction between "religious" voters (specifically, those who claim a personal relationship with Jesus) and what I'd call religiously "observant" voters (those who are committed to regular religious practice). Sarah Palin is an example of someone who's very "religious" in her self-presentation (thinks God personally favors her), but is much less religiously observant than many Americans. She clearly attends church irregularly and goes to different churches when she does attend, including ones that have incompatible theological positions. Obviously, her spotty church involvement would not allow the kind of deep commitment that many people have to their congregations (hard to believe that she is doing regular volunteer work, tithing, or the like). I gathered from some of the coverage of her religious life that this is actually not very unusual, particularly for "megachurch" Christians. Some of the polls measure religious commitment by how often the respondent attends church, and by that measure presumably Palin is only moderately religious (otherwise, she'd be able to identify her church clearly). On the other hand, by any theological measure Palin is an extremist. How are these two different standards tracked?

    • Posted By: Willian C DeMuth @ 11/12/2008 11:58:03 AM


      We can no longer mince words, anyone???s belief system is indicative of a greater underlying mental illness if they believe that you are communicating with the dead.

      Professing to have a personal relationship with Jesus is in fact no different than claiming to be Napoleon.

      In addition, the presumption that the creator of all reality might concern itself with any individual???s petty little self is an indication that they suffer from delusions of grandeur.

    • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 11/10/2008 9:36:31 AM

      Many confuse the difference between spirituality and religion.

      I was taught that spirituality is the presence of god (spirit/higher power), and religion is the search for god. By that measure, a person could be deeply spiritual and never enter a formal house of worship. In the same vein, a person with a strong religious committment could be a person who is deeply committed to his or her house of worship but not have a particularly close relationship with god.

      Evangelical Christians, Orthodox Jews, Shia Moslems, Mormons - all of these groups seem to me to have a very deep committment to both their particular house of worship and their definition of god.

      The problem we as Americans face is when anyone has such strong committments AND expects everyone else to, as well. This seems to be the line evangelical Christians in this country have stepped over: deep and abiding faith in one's beliefs is acceptable; forcing others to agree and intimidating them when they don't is not.

      And using those beliefs as the sole test for public office flys in the face of our country's tenet of separation of church and state.

  • Posted By: Willian C DeMuth @ 11/12/2008 9:37:57 AM

    Evangelicals, even the word makes me cringe.

    In the world we live in, we cannot afford to pretend that some of their beliefs are not absurd, and deny their agenda is as militant as the Muslims.

    Evolution deniers are no different than holocaust deniers and need to be treated as such.

    Their corrupting influence on our system of government has taxpayer???s money being used to further their indoctrination and exploitation of the ignorant weak and infirmed amongst us.

    Reality must be the cornerstone of our society and our government???s policies, lest these lunatics continue to work toward the demise of us all.

    In short, it is up to rational minded men to see that their beloved Jesus does not bring them the Armageddon they so desperately want for Christmas!!

    Please have the courage to stop being politically correct, and challenge these lunatics at every opportunity lest they drag our world into a new dark age.

  • Posted By: Mwalimu @ 11/10/2008 8:51:08 PM

    The Post in Post-Evangelical America is premature. Evangelicals have found a new way to increase their power. They plan to launch a new wave of persecutions against gays. Last week, as California's electoral votes went to Obama, various religious groups, shamelessly disregarding the 9th Commandment, passed Proposition 8, banning gay marriage. They also succeeded in passing a law in Arkansas banning gay adoptions. By adopting the tactics of Joseph Goebbles, Hitler's Nazi propaganda minister, evangelicas have found a new way to get power, find some one to persecute - in this case homosexuals. First, they plan to ban gay marriage.Then they plan additional assaults on gays.

    As usual, there's a lack of logic in the current evangelical drive to wipe out gay marriage. How can you save marriage by banning it? And how can you promote traditional Christian family values if you not only prohibit others from adopting them, but also slam the door of the church in their faces? Logically, this doesn't make sense, but then evangelicals, like the Shiites of Iran, believe they are immune to logic.

    Already this illogic is spreading. Just yesterday a group of Greek Orthodox monks got into a brawl with a group of Armenian Orthodox monks in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. Imagine - two groups of monks, supposedly holy men devoted to God, brawling like two rival street gangs out of "West Side Story" for a piece of turf in supposedly the most sacred shrine in Christendom in the supposedly Holy City.

    And I wish that a brawl between monks was the only problem. To put a contemporary spin on the words of Martin Luther King, absurdity anywhere breeds absurdity everywhere. As Voltaire observed when we believe in absurdities, we will commit atrocities.

    At the time of writing, another suicide bomber launched another attack in Iraq killing a number of innocent children. A couple of weeks ago, religious extremists in India and Iraq attacked Christians. By adopting Goebbels tactics, giving a green light to lies, hatred, and bigotry in California, Arkansas, and Florida, evangelicals are giving a green light for religious persecution everywhere, including religious persecutions of Christians. What goes around, comes around. When Christian miniroities become the victims of religious persecutions, evangelicals in America have no one to blame but themselves.

  • Posted By: KultureKritic @ 11/07/2008 12:12:45 PM

    What other lie did you learn from the hippies that teach at colleges today?
    Long before the United States Constitution, the colonies had written documents that established government and citizen's rights under God's authority. The drafters of the U. S. Constitution were aware of these documents and considered them in drafting the document. The expression of America's early documents is unmistakably Christian.

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 11/10/2008 2:52:32 PM

      "Long before the United States Constitution, the colonies had written documents that established government and citizen's rights under God's authority."

      Perhaps. Too bad those don't carry the force of law, as the constitution does.

    • Posted By: The_Atheist @ 11/07/2008 2:01:14 PM

      What documents are you referring to? Can you provide us with a copy of these documents?

      • Posted By: rexymeteorite @ 11/10/2008 2:15:50 AM

        No, of course not. People like this guy can never site a specific source except the bible.

        • Posted By: Mirabhai @ 11/10/2008 6:31:54 AM

          You think he knows the Bible? I usually find that these characters don't actually read it much (must use it for thumping instead). Remember when Sarah Palin claimed she was inspired to a life of public "service" by Queen Esther? Do you think she read the bit where Esther had all her enemies slaughtered along with their children?

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 7:30:17 PM

      Ever heard of the Treaty of Tripoli .... read it sometime. First of all the majority of our founding fathers were DEISTS and most also practiced Freemasonry...they did NOT believe in any established religion and PURPOSELY left religion out of the Declaration of Independence AND the Constitution. I suggest you educate yourself a little better. Religion has NO place in politics nor does it have any place other than in your homes and churches. Please keep it there and quit trying to shove your beliefs down the throats of we "common sense and reason" freethinkers.

  • Posted By: RTGO @ 11/10/2008 12:52:30 PM


    Paela Posted:

    Obama is a professing Christian. There is a big difference between a professing Christian and a real Christian. He is also a cafeteria Christian - those who are of the opinion that they can just pick and choose whatever they like about Christianity and discard what they don't like. They also think it's good to add in a few Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu beliefs, and anything else. Time, God, and Jesus Christ will separate the wheat from the chaff.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paela,
    according to your definition of what Christianity is Dr. Dobson, Pat Robinson, Ralph Reed, and a whole host of other religion peddling politicians would fall into the category of "cafeteria Christians".

    Your definition of what makes one a Christian doesn't even come close to being Biblical accurate according to John 3:16. President-Elect Obama has declared he is a Christian and prays in the name of the Father, The Son , and The Holy Ghost. He has accepted Jesus as his personal savior.

    What you and the rest of the religious domineers are doing to the Body is blasphemous. YOU DO NOT DETERMINE WHO IS SAVED BY THE BLOOD OF CHRIST. PERIOD!

  • Posted By: RO in Reno @ 11/06/2008 7:18:43 PM

    Thank God we have returned to a reality based government, the faith based government was taking us to the dark ages

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 10:41:43 PM

      2000-4000 yrs ago before the advent of science and technology when people were basically primitive it may have been acceptable to believe in the myths and superstition of religion because man had not yet had the intelligence and know-how to explain the "mysteries" of life and the universe. You'd think after 40+ centuries man would be wise enough to deduce that there was no longer a "need" for these illogical and irrelevant beliefs. I'm sorry but I don't understand how ANYONE with any semblance of intelligence and the ability for logical, critical thinking , common sense and reason could believe in such drivel and nonsense.

      I can't understand people's inherent need to have an explanation for everything. Why this, why that ? I say.. why the hell does it matter ? Is knowing or not knowing really going to make any difference ??? Why can't people just accept their existence, mind their own business and live their lives without having to have some kind of crutch to rely on or an excuse to condone their behavior?

      Religion is a disease that breeds ignorance, intolerance, self-righteousness, bigotry, hatred, greed and a blindness to truth and reality. Nothing more than a tool of fear to keep the weak in line and obedient. Thank goodness that 20% and growing numbers of the population have not fallen for this deception like the rest of the sheep. Freethinkers are the ones who contribute most to the good and advancement of society...I'll name Thomas Edison, Einstein, Mark Twain, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates as an example. The brightest and most successful men in history were unencumbered by the shackles of religion.

      • Posted By: Andrew21 @ 11/10/2008 12:22:36 PM

        Isaac Newton--Nicholas Copernicus--Sir Francis Bacon--Johannes Kepler--Rene' Descartes--Robert Boyle--Michael Faraday--Gregor Mendel--Max Planck. All are examples of men of science who also believed in God. The idea that one must check their mind at the door in order to believe in God is patronizing, delusional and self-serving. Albert Einstein, though he didn't believe in a "personal God", rejected the idea that the universe did not have a creator. He said, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." So much for "only weak minds believe in God'

  • Posted By: kathyk49 @ 11/10/2008 11:19:08 AM

    Being a Christian I am sadded by some of the comments on this forum. I am not a right wing conservative nor do I think Christ himself would be if he were here to voice his opinion. Christ is the example of what Christians are to be and that does include the predjudices that are held by the far right...

  • Posted By: Jack999 @ 11/10/2008 9:42:55 AM

    Dont you feel tired hearing this" Women's Womb" issue pop up on every Elections like a Culture?

    Does it sound like which come first issue, an Egg or the Chicken Question?

  • Posted By: justapreacher @ 11/07/2008 9:41:55 AM

    Those who do not believe there is a God are call BY NAME in the Bible:

    Psalms 14:1 - "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God."

    • Posted By: floridacadman @ 11/07/2008 9:45:40 AM

      No offence preacher, but, it had so many authors, they dont even know who wrote that book, and, it was edited by tyranical Kings over the course of 300 years.
      That book is the word of man, not God. Quote it if you like, but youd have more cridability quoting The Cat in the Hat, at least we knew Mr Geisel.

      • Posted By: justapreacher @ 11/07/2008 9:56:26 AM

        Suggestion, find a Bible that has (usually in the front) the letter that those 70 scholars wrote to King James as their "presentation letter" when they'd finished their trascribing and delivered the finished work to him.

        Also, in the book of the Revelation, in chapter 22, vs. 18 & 19, it says, "[18] For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
        [19] And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

        I quote this with all do respect & in no offence to you, but please do consider that the Bible is indeed the inspired word of God and without the inspiration of God, we can never come close to trully understanding it.

        • Posted By: rexymeteorite @ 11/10/2008 2:59:40 AM

          okay 'justapreacher' tell me this if you will

          Why do Christians justify things to non christians WITH THE GODDAMNED BIBLE? I DO NOT BELIEVE THE BIBLE IN THE FIRST PLACE SO QUOTING IT WILL GET YOU NO WHERE.

        • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 8:31:58 PM

          Quote away but your efforts are moot and redundant as those of use who do not believe in your book of mythical, magical fairytales cannot be swayed by such ridiculous dogma so full of hate, violence, contradictions and a total lack of any kind of "proof" , evidence or even a shred of credibility. The "bible" is nothing more than a human-conceived book of allegorical folklore based on pagan beliefs and superstitions and is no more "believable" than Aesop's fairyales or the Dr Seu\\Seuss collection .

          • Posted By: rexymeteorite @ 11/10/2008 2:41:34 AM

            once again *applause* you are quickly becoming my new favorite poster livingwithcommonsenseandreason

        • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 8:24:31 PM

          Quoting your bible is useless to those who do not believe in the book of mystical magical fairytales. You waste your breath, your efforts are redundant. Don't you get that ???

        • Posted By: floridacadman @ 11/07/2008 10:07:30 AM

          I was born and raised a Catholic, thats why when I turned 13 and got confirmed, I ran like hell.
          And Im sure you are aware that in the days when the bible was written, the contributors signed the names of the scholars of the day, there-by making its true authors totally unknown.
          It was inspired by a people scared to death of the leaders of the day. It mentions nothing of dinosaurs or other verifyable facts, because the authors simply didnt know about them when it was written...God would have.

          • Posted By: justapreacher @ 11/07/2008 10:22:36 AM

            Being "scared to death of the leaders of the day" was, indeed a part of their undoing. Their fear should have remained in God.

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 8:21:15 PM

      Franky the "fool" believes in a god because he cannot believe in himself.

  • Posted By: OhioGal @ 11/07/2008 10:35:45 AM

    Also, overturning Roe v Wade would do little to stop abortion. Control of abortion would return to the states where in all but a few the majority of the population supports abortion rights. Look to South Dakota for an example. They have tried twice to limit abortion and twice failed. Look at Colorado and the bill that failed to give legal rights to every individual from conception.

    Looking at this from a practical view as to what can actual limit abortion, I am all for providing birth control to any who wish to use it. Support must also be provided to those who cannot afford to raise another child. If we aren't willing to feed the hungry and clothe the naked then we really aren't willing to save the millions of aborted children. If we don't want health care for all then can we complain when a poor woman decides that she can't afford all of the prenatal visits, the labor and delivery and the newborn nursery costs? Can we deny the basic help that she needs and then claim the moral high ground.

    I don't think that constant welfare handouts are the answer either. We need to improve our educational system so that there are less poor people. We need college scholarships to move more people up into the middle class. Perhaps we can give aid to the poor in exchange for community service. Aid given with dignity and in a manner that creates job skills can eliminate the need for further aid. I think we can find a middle ground that works.

    • Posted By: rexymeteorite @ 11/10/2008 2:24:09 AM

      You deserve a standing ovation. Way to go, absolutly amazing post.

    • Posted By: toby123 @ 11/07/2008 2:19:23 PM

      I'll just say, OhioGal, while I disagree with your pro-life stance, it's nice to finally hear the logical continuation to it rather than the usual pro-life ends after birth.

    • Posted By: The_Atheist @ 11/07/2008 10:45:17 AM

      OhioGal, you must be a genius. The idea of providing aid in exchange for community service....brilliant....i love it.

      • Posted By: OhioGal @ 11/07/2008 11:33:17 AM

        Thanks.

        And I really believe that education is the foundation of the American dream. We must have students with strong reading, math and science skills and by science I definitely mean fact based, evolutionary science. It is the foundation of so much that we do with applications in genetics and medicine. Also, education helps with understanding our environment and global warming and why it isn't good for any of us. Sarah Palin said that it didn't matter what caused global warming as long as we all worked to solve it. That is like a woman pouring gasoline on a fire saying that she doesn't believe gasoline will burn but that we should all work together to put out the fire. She doesn't understand that as long as she is pouring gasoline on the fire the fire will continue blazing and that it is much harder to put out while she is feeding it.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/07/2008 10:47:46 AM

      Arkansas never removed the law on the books outlawing abortion. Should the Supreme Court ever have reversed it's position in Roe, the state would have simply reverted to the ACA. In a lot of states, a reversal of Roe would have swept abortion right back into the horrible practices of the past. Likewise Federal legislation outlawing the taking of a minor across state lines to get an abortion will make abortion completely unaccessable to persons who might just not have any business carrying a child to term, such as in rape or incest, etc.
      The States Rights argument on abortion is a step off a steep cliff.

  • Posted By: jcwils @ 11/06/2008 4:54:49 PM

    Here is a fascinating quote from 1787 when Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh , had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years earlier:
    "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.
    Does this strike anyone else as likely given the promises we've heard from the pres-elect?

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 10:54:06 PM

      The collapse of democracy due to loose fiscal policy would be directly related to BUSH... it's already happened.

    • Posted By: toby123 @ 11/07/2008 1:31:25 PM

      Sadly I do mostly agree with the quote. It is always likely the majority will act in their short-term best interests rather than the long term best interests of their country.
      But your comparison is laughable beyond Bush's loose fiscal policy undermining the country.

    • Posted By: indyinaz @ 11/06/2008 4:59:34 PM

      Brilliant! Yep, sounds right on to me. Dictatorship, here we come

      • Posted By: leepdx @ 11/07/2008 1:49:06 AM

        Actually it's more like dictatorship there you go!

    • Posted By: Mac58 @ 11/06/2008 5:26:50 PM

      That does sound like it makes a little sense, but then again he said that almost 250 years ago and this democracy is still alive. How many democracies have fallen to dictatorships in the past 100 years?...not that many I think. And it's been proven that under the right president like FDR who helped bring america out of the depression or even clinton who lowered the national deficit, that america can prosper fiscally and continue to grow.

  • Posted By: Historypro @ 11/06/2008 7:59:52 PM

    I have been completely disgusted and turned off by the influence that Evangelicals have exerted in American politics over the last several decades. I have news for those people: they do not own God. Additionally, they are not the only Americans who are patriotic, have family values, and work hard. I was raised Catholic and when I began my own journey into Protestantism I was stunned to discover the lack of religious literacy in certain Protestant denominations -- none more so than with Evangelicals. Very few have any grasp of Christian history or the basic tenets of Christian faith (such as tolerance and love). Moreover, I cannot tell you how many actually told me that Catholics aren't "Christian" (hello?? Catholics were the FIRST Christians you dolts!) or how many seriously believe that the only highway to heaven is their backwoods country road. My own faith journey brought me into the United Church of Christ, a denomination known for its intellectualism, tolerance, and social justice -- a church in many ways similar to Catholicism (Catholicism lite, perhaps?). I would never become an Evangelical and it has troubled me no end that Evangelicans and their ilk have exerted such influence in America. They are the Intellectual Taliban of Christianity and I don't doubt for a minute that they wouldn't embrace witch burning if it were allowed. Thank God that this country has begun to take back the country for ALL OF ITS PEOPLE, those who believe as well as those who don't.

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 10:25:10 PM

      I beg to differ... Catholics are most certainly NOT Christians. They are indeed MARIANS. Almost all tenets of the Catholic faith are directly contradictory and contrary to the bible... just as an example 1. the importance of Mary ( who is NEVER given any significance or reverence in the bible other than the fact that she was the mother of Christ...PERIOD) 2. The extremely heavy presence of pagan idolotry... statues of Mary, Saints, Christ, etc...the bible states CLEARLY and PRECISELY that there shall be NO GRAVEN IMAGES. 3... confession to priests ....the bible again clearly states that a man shall confess his sins DIRECTLY to god... no middleman involved. 4 The idiocy that is the Pope ... NO WHERE does it say anywhere that there is ANY representative on earth that has a direct line to god. 5. Recitation of prayers and rosary....bible warns against the utterance of such pre-fabricated drivel and also against rituals like candle lighting, religious medals, revering saints, etc. I can go on and on and on but why bother. Religion is the biggest HOAX ever played on mankind.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 11/07/2008 10:57:26 AM

      During Europes war's of religion the immigrants who came here were by and large the repressed groups.
      In our colonial History there is the Sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God. The cultural descendants of these people rule the roost today. We are a Nation of Heretics, practicing Democracy in the face of a history poorly suited to it. The zealots would still have witch-trials if they could enact it by statute.

  • Posted By: Daichan @ 11/07/2008 3:59:02 AM

    Comment:The evangelical agenda is so narrow! I wish they would extend their concerns for embryos to other forms of life--even fully formed, conscious human beings who die in great numbers in campaigns of mass organized violence. Somehow evangelicals are wishy-washy about war. Why are they so focused on abortion as THE litmus test of a person's morality?

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 10:12:59 PM

      These are the same people who have NO concern whatsoever for the "right to life" for anything outside of the human species. These are the same christians who abuse their pets, kill wildlife for "fun" and "sport" , murder innocent animals for their meat and their fur, destroy wildlife by carelessly destroying their natural habitats in a lust and greed for MONEY. Where in your book of fairytales does is say that all other forms of life are expendable and insignificant ? I thought people were to be the STEWARDS of the planet and all that inhabits it ?? Hmmmm...last time I checked to "steward" meant to CARE for.

  • Posted By: baybay @ 11/07/2008 7:22:17 AM

    IN RESPONSE TO OHIOGAL:
    Yes, Jesus taught "love of ALL." You're correct! This ALSO includes the love of our unborn children!!!! Execution is not the same. That's justice for people who had a choice between right & wrong. Our aborted children didn't have a choice.
    CONGRATULATIONS AMERICA!
    You've just elected a man who supports BABY MURDER!
    All the best in the next four!

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 10:02:11 PM

      Unless it's CAPABLE of living and breathing OUTSIDE of the womb it doesn't count and it's far from "murder".
      So sad to see people who've been indoctrinated w/such stupid self-righteousness. JUDGE NOT LEST YE BE JUDGED.

    • Posted By: OhioGal @ 11/07/2008 8:46:34 AM

      My point is that I expect self-described prolife Christians to be totally prolife. I am prolife. I believe in the sanctity of all human life. I believe that abortion is the killing of innocent human life and I am definitely against abortion. I also am against war of choice because I am prolife. I am against execution because I am prolife. Like I asked, why would you follow the example of the Romans who executed Jesus rather than the example of Jesus. Jesus wouldn't have used abortion as an excuse to cover himself falling short on the prolife issue. I expect that if you are prolife you will be fully prolife. Anything less is hypocritical and the nation judges you not as prolife but as a vicious wing of the Republican attack machine and so doesn't listen to your message of life. To be a good messenger you must be a good example. As long as you excuse yourself and your fellow evangelicals from following your own message then no one will take you seriously and your issue will continue to languish.

      If the prolife movement wishes to be taken seriously it must disconnect from political parties. It must hold all candidates accountable for their stands that are not prolife. It must not only work to lower the abortion rate or even eliminate abortion but must work to lower the infant mortality rate in this country. We have a very high infant mortality rate in this country where we have the "best medical system in the world." There are many third world countries that have much lower infant mortality rates than we do. Where is the outrage about these deaths from the prolife movement? Where is the care and concern and Christian love for these infants? When over a million people were killed in a month in Rwanda where was the prolife movement. Who spoke for those one million innocent lives? Where was the prolife movement? Innocent people are still being killed in Sudan. Where is the prolife movement? Where is the Christian love and concern?

      As for execution, again, why would you not follow the example of Christ? Since when is it appropriate for a follower of Christ to disregard and make excuses for not following Christ. Let God judge those people. It is our job to keep our society safe and we can do that by keeping people in prison for life, without parole. Then of course, there are those who are innocent but found guilty by a court and so again, you end up killing the innocent. Don't you trust in God to judge? Can't you follow the example of Jesus?

      Become a reputable movement and maybe you will find more success.

      • Posted By: justapreacher @ 11/07/2008 9:44:46 AM

        OHIOGAL
        Your thoughts are well taken, but do keep in mind that even Jesus had respect for the law of the land; therefore, if a state's law say execute, so be it; if it says life, no parole, so be that, too.

        • Posted By: midwestinMA @ 11/07/2008 1:44:44 PM

          Justapreacher, I don't think you're backing up your ideas very well with this statement. As Ohiogal said, Roe vs. Wade is currently the law of the land. So....?

          I live in Massachusetts where same sex marriage being legal is the law of the land (and, I must add, in the 2 years I've been living here I've seen no evidence of moral decay or straight people's marriages being in danger) I'd venture to guess, though, your idea of Jesus wouldn't support this.

        • Posted By: OhioGal @ 11/07/2008 10:24:59 AM

          You want to change the law of the land when it comes to abortion but not when it comes to execution. Be prolife and change both. Abortion is currently the law of our land and so if I follow your statement that means that I shouldn't speak out against abortion.

    • Posted By: Lakini980 @ 11/07/2008 10:33:59 AM

      Our President Elect does not advocate the murder of the unborn; he supports the right of each individual to make up their own mind, to decide for themselves, to practice their "free will", which if memory serves was given us by God.

    • Posted By: Lakini980 @ 11/07/2008 10:28:21 AM

      President Elect Obama does not advocate the murder of unborn children, he supports a person's right to choose by their own free will....which, if I am remembering correctly, was given to us by God.

  • Posted By: angieS @ 11/07/2008 8:06:05 AM

    I am very sad to see some of the views that are posted in this article. If you go to church, pray, and read scripture....then why would you not want to be a born again Christian?? As for Obama, no one knows his heart, but his actions do tell a story. Abortion is murder, say what you want to say about it. Call me a radical Christian or what ever. Everyone else can stand up for what they believe, so can I. Do I hate people who do these things, no. I pray for them, and I pray for our leaders. To love everyone dosen't mean you have follow their views, the bible says over and over to watch and be wary and not be deceived. Shouldn't issues that go against the word of God be put ahead of the economy??

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 9:58:37 PM

      "Shouldn't issues that go against the word of God be put ahead of the economy?? "

      In short... NO. Keep RELIGION OUT of politics. It and moral issues DO NOT and SHOULD NOT have any impact on the government or government policy. Not everyone believes in YOUR beliefs or YOUR imaginary god. Don't try to dictate the morals , rights or responsibilities of the many by the few. This is EXACTLY why there is a separation of church and state.

    • Posted By: not-fooled-by-slick-talking-charlatans @ 11/07/2008 5:49:08 PM

      I believe I can give you an example of why some decide not to be a born again (ie. non-denominational) Christian. Twenty-eight years ago, my partner married a man who was a member of her church. He was a dynamic individual, well on the road to becoming a pastor. They had two daughters within 5 years. While earning his master's degree to become a family counselor, he met a woman who shared his professional aspirations as well as his religious beliefs. He abandoned his first wife and their daughters to be with this woman. He left them without a car and emptied their savings account. He stayed with is second wife for 17 yrs. He has since dumped his second wife and moved on to a younger "trophy" wife. And this man is a pastor in a non-denominational church AND a marriage and family counselor.

      The moral of this true account is that being born-again does not make a person more moral than anyone else. This is a great example of the notion that it is not one's religious affiliation that brings one close to God.

    • Posted By: MTR1973 @ 11/07/2008 11:31:04 AM

      Hon, pray for yourself. Praying for people who neither asked for nor need/want you to do so is condascending and unnecessary. If someone wants you to murmur a bunch of words that nobody but you will hear, they'll ask you.

  • Posted By: composer433 @ 11/07/2008 8:16:59 AM

    If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one. If you think that gay sex is wrong, don't sleep with another man/woman as appropriate. You do not, however, have the right to force your views and beliefs on the entire population. That is what the Taliban and their fundamentalist cohorts do, and such behavior is just as wrong here as it is in the Middle East.

    • Posted By: tbourlon @ 11/07/2008 9:59:44 AM

      Why do pro-choice people think the simple solution is "don't approve of abortion, don't have one?" It's not about what I want, it's not about ME. It's not about YOU, either. It's about the unborn child who dies in the process. You don't have to be religious to deduce that a human fetus is both alive and human, and that killing it is murder. You just need to be logical. What I find really strange is the number of "pro-choice" people who agree with me that a human fetus is alive, and does die in abortion, and probably wouldn't get one themselves, either. If that's the way you feel, then why are you pro-choice? It makes no sense to me.

      • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 9:49:39 PM

        Are you pro-lifers really that naive ?? Most responsible people use some manner of birth control when it comes to planning their families. No amount of cautiousness can guarantee 100% that a pregnancy won't occur. Other times pregnancy is due to rape or incest and on occasion through sheer foolishness and ignorance .. ie not using any kind of contraception. Not everyone is in the position financially, physically or emotionally ready to start a family.

        Are you going to FORCE these popele to carry a baby to term when such conditions warrant that it would be a hardship ? Conditions that have the possibility of creating situations where there may be physical or emotional abuse or neglect ?? Or do you just want us to become baby machines for those of you who don't want to go through the red tape of the adoption process. ?

        Statisticcs PROVE that abortion reduces crime and poverty. If you por-lifers are so concerned about saving these lives and forcing people to have children they neither WANT or are ready for... then put your money where your mouth is and PAY for the women to carry these children to term, ....clothing, food, medical care, etc and then be so good as to take them off their hands and raise them yourselves.

      • Posted By: toby123 @ 11/07/2008 2:07:10 PM

        I'll mention a few reasons why someone still might be pro-choice even if they consider a fetus alive:
        1. The point is having 'choice'. For example, I dislike smoking and drinking, I think both smell bad, makes me weaze, and has a slight chance of killing me by either lung cancer or drunk driving respectively. Some religions even see drinking as a sin. But in general people do not work to outlaw either, it's left a free choice.
        2. Quality of life concerns. Is the baby really better of it right after it is born it is left to starve or be beaten? The mother should not have a child until she has the capacity to care for it properly.
        3. This is a more cold-hearted view, certainly not shared by all pro-choice, but is my own: Ok, so maybe the fetus is alive, but so what? It's a couple cells, less than the 'alive' cells you kill when you cut your finger or a cancerous mass you have removed. Until the fetus has it's own functioning brain, I see it as a nonissue.

      • Posted By: midwestinMA @ 11/07/2008 1:36:33 PM

        The problem I have with this is that the supposed "pro life", self righteous people in my life (see, my parents) are not completely pro life at all. Please note I'm not including you in this statement, tbourlon, because I have no idea how far your beliefs extend.

        My father calls Obama "a murderer". That in and of itself doesn't seem too Christian to me, but that's another point. My father, however, seems to believe it's okay for a woman to get an abortion if her life is in danger. Isn't that killing the unborn child too?

        Plus, I wonder where it ends. As I said, my parents claim to be strongly pro life yet my mother takes birth control and so do I. Does that make us something closer to murderers? What if, god forbid, I was a victim of a crime and took the morning after pill to save myself from having to bear a rapist's child. I would dare my father to look me in the eye in that situation and call me a murderer. Maybe, when I die, God would tell me I was indeed wrong and I'll be punished. That's something I'd personally have to deal with though.

        These same people are all for the death penalty and the war. They have no problems labeling Obama as a murderer but if I so much say the same about Bush I'm labeled a terrible person and unpatriotic.

        I really wish the issue was as black and white as "abortion is murder and should go away", but unfortunately there are too much grey areas to contend with.

  • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 11/09/2008 9:04:53 PM


    I'll say something that I am sure Ms. Miller knows; seeing the exit polls through a religious perspective may confuse the role of religion in politics.

    I agree that we have to start somewhere, and a large demographic describe themselves as "Christian Conservatives" but that is not all they are, it may be an important definition for them, but their concerns, interests and yes, racial prejudices or lack of do play a part too. Many people who describe themselves as "Christians" or "Real American Patriots" did not vote for Obama just because of his skin color (which begs the question "How American is that?"). Religion itself, which is the subject of this column does not play a bigger role than prejudice or economic interest. It may be a good short-hand to designated a group by a name but when the media constantly simplifies the complexity of any group, they dumb down the facts.

    There were many "Evangelicals" who voted for Obama because of his message, high-mindedness or economic platform, that doesn't have anything to do with religion, it just means that when the economy is issue number one, social issues take the backseat. Give us a few years of econimic recovery and we're bound to see more kakameemee (sp?) issues like "We're losing Christmas" being toss around by the right with some success.

    • Posted By: Cazador1972 @ 11/09/2008 9:08:02 PM


      ... That was meant to read "economic" on the last paragraph... I also forgot to say this was a beautifully written column, despite the aforementioned oversimplification of voting blocks. : )

  • Posted By: CrimeaRiver @ 11/09/2008 8:28:51 PM

    "The pro-Obama faithful represent a wild diversity of the American religious experience... Indeed, it includes almost every committed person of faith except those whose church culture insists on a personal relationship with Jesus Christ."

    You're kidding, right?

    Anyway, "church culture" has seldom been the most direct or genuine route to a personal relationship with Jesus Christ -- it's frequently in place simply to facilitate the journey.

  • Posted By: TheVigil @ 11/07/2008 9:57:08 AM

    Wouldn't it be nice if we started taking religious identity in America back from the evangelical notion that "you have to believe like me"?

    There are forms of evangelism that equate to a form of indoctrination - just legitimatized by vocabulary and assocation, not ethics and a belief in freedom of worship.

    There are also forms of evangelicalism that genuinely try to help the unconverted and help them to see God's beauty...I want to see more of that.

    If you are evangelical and do not believe others have the right to believe in God in ways other than you do, you are not patriotic. We respect freedom of religion here. World councils have decided it is a basic human right. I do not support your quest to take that away.

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 8:15:32 PM

      Excuse me... not believe others have the "right" to believe ?? Are they coming to YOU to make a request or are you just arrogantly ASSUMING that they wish for you to come "save" them ??? This is EXACTLY the problem with religion. YOU have NO right to impose your beliefs on anyone or to assume that they are welcomed or needed/wanted.

    • Posted By: Livingwithcommonsenseandreason @ 11/09/2008 8:12:32 PM

      What the religious FAIL to take into consideration and realize is that we are guaranteed not only freedom OF religion but freedom FROM religion. They cant seem to wrap their little closed minds around that concept. I am sick and tired of being looked upon as a pariah because I refuse to believe in their mythical god. Sorry, i cannot life my life based on superstition, fear and blind ignorance. If ever there was a GIFT to humanity...it is the gift to be able to use your mind for critical thinking, reason and logic. Religion is contradictory in that a person is not allowed to exercise this "gift" when they have been continuously indoctrinated in dogma since birth and never had the opportunity to think for themselves for fear of being shunned, ridiculed, rebuked and persecuted for having the intelligence to question and not accept everything as "fact" when there is nothing to substantiate those claims.

    • Posted By: Andrew21 @ 11/08/2008 11:49:09 AM

      could you give me an example of a Christian denomination which does not believe in the right of others to believe in God in ways other than themselves? I have been an evangelical christian for most of my life and have yet to come across a single person who has shared that belief. Of course others have a right to believe as they see fit. This is another example of the Left setting up a paper tiger of supposed "right wing beliefs" and then tearing it apart. Give me a break.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse