Washington, UNITED STATES:  White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card(L) speaks as US President George W. Bush looks on in the Oval Office of the White House 28 March 2006 in Washington, DC. Bush announced the resignation of White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card and his replacement by Josh Bolten.  Bolten, 50, has served as director of the Office of Management and Budget since June 2003. Prior to that, he served as deputy chief of staff for policy at the White House from January 2001 to June 2003.
Mandel Ngan / AFP-Getty Images
Card served as Bush's chief of staff from 2000-2006.
VOICES OF EXPERIENCE

How To Run A White House

A Bush chief of staff offers advice for Obama.

 
Sponsored by
 
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

What's the best way to play good cop? Get a really hard-core bad cop. That's precisely what Barack Obama did Thursday in his first move as president-elect, selecting notoriously pugnacious Democratic Rep. Rahm Emanuel to serve as his chief of staff. "No one I know is better at getting things done than Rahm Emanuel," Obama said in announcing his pick.

That's one way of putting it. Emanuel, 48, has developed a reputation as a fierce taskmaster since his days as a Clinton White House operative, so much so that even his mother reportedly calls him "Rahmbo." He once sent a rotting fish to a pollster who rubbed him the wrong way, and he seems to delight in wagging his partially lopped-off middle finger at rivals (the result of a teenage meat-slicing mishap). "He's got this big old pair of brass balls, and you can just hear 'em clanking when he walks down the halls of Congress," Paul Begalatold Rolling Stone back in 2005, after serving with Emanuel on Clinton's staff.

Given the challenges ahead, he'll need all the fortitude he can muster. But can he forge a consensus, as well as crack the whip? NEWSWEEK caught up with President Bush's first White House chief of staff, Andy Card—who might be characterized as Emanuel's temperamental opposite—to get his insights into the trials and tribulations of the job. Card took his share of lumps, but he lasted longer than all but one other White House chief of staff.

NEWSWEEK: Does the chief of staff need to have the thickest skin in Washington?
Andy Card: Yes. You have to have a steely resolve, thick skin, a velvet glove, a listening ear—and you have to be decisive. There will be scores of people clamoring for your attention on any given day; probably about 20 to 30 in the White House, another 20 to 30 members of Congress. And in terms of the media—well, they're insatiable, so I would take my direction from the press secretary. Probably about 10 percent of the cabinet on any given day is scratching at your door. Develop some priorities and delegate, because it's a grueling job, a 24/7 job. I think [current chief of staff] Josh Bolten does a better job at it than I did.

What's the single most important aspect of the job to get right?
Earn and keep the trust of the president. Those are two different statements. Don't talk about things you shouldn't be talking about, beyond what the president tells you. Remember that you're serving the president and the First Lady, not a constituency. You're not only there to help the president do his job, but you are also responsible for protecting the institution of the presidency—and sometimes, those will appear to be in conflict. Also, the White House is very good about paying attention to structure and organization, but I think the chief of staff also needs to pay attention to the psychology, emotions and needs of the president beyond policy. That could include contemplation time, time to call a friend or time to read a book. The chief of staff needs to be focused on the president's 24-hour experience, not just his time in the Oval Office.

Any tips for how to balance all the competing needs from different people within executive branch?
You have to have excellent peripheral vision, recognizing that a lot of other people in the White House will have tunnel vision. People who are experts on policy might come breathlessly into your office declaring that they're ready to get something done, but the truth is the decision may be disconnected from the reality of connecting with Congress, or the United Nations, or even the American people. Just because the policy wonks are ready doesn't mean the climate is receptive to the debate.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Thevail @ 11/15/2008 2:21:26 PM

    Absolutely correct..except that it was Republicans and their corporate socialism that insists that no business ever be allowed to fail that drove America and hence Americans into this condition.

    And looky who IS STILL WHINING, and not rolling up their sleeves, fully content to sit on their fat, lazy a$$e$ and blame everything on a guy who isn't even the president yet.
    Republicans. Whaa Whaa,, where's my right wing nipple gone. Ugh..grow up.

  • Posted By: kkhan @ 11/13/2008 10:22:18 AM

    VOICES OF EXPERIENCE - why offer it to Obama, when the majority of the electorate rejected the importance
    of it in electing the new President. Let this political magician figure it out for himself - his campaign was based on the criteria that he has the answers & solutions to the mutitude of problems that plague the nation.

  • Posted By: Enio Marini Connecticut @ 11/12/2008 3:12:55 AM

    Unfortunately,
    Your Absolutely Correct

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse