Detroit: Begging For Help

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Thaens @ 11/11/2008 10:37:52 PM

    Agree with the earlier poster that we need to be making more QUALITY items locally and buy locally. We are the most ingenious people on the planet, we should be making the BEST cars so that the damand will be there. The problem is that GM has been turning out uncompetitive products for a long time and is too slow to retool. A massive bailout would be setting a bad precedent - when will it end? If we bail them out, they will only go under again 5 years from now. It's a bailout of thinking and attitude, not money that is needed here.

    Christopher Thaens
    Tampa Bay, Florida

  • Posted By: BigRootHog @ 11/11/2008 6:11:46 PM

    How many industries have already been forced to fail so developing countries and their dictators could profit from our loss of jobs and futures?
    The steel, furniture, clothing, food, high tech, low tech and any other tech industries have already been killed here in the USA. Sure, you can bottom line manufacturing, using slave level wages across the world; but what have you accomplished when you have bankrupted the people who used to buy all those consumables? Well, the answer is now apparant: global financial meltdown beyond the nightmares of those who DEMAND control of the world.
    I dare say; we now have shown the impotence of those "Oh so smart" Global One World Order idiots. When the consumer can no longer consume because he has no job or money, bad things happen to economies on a massive level.
    The only cure is a return to the common sense approach. Nothing is bought here that is not made here!! Localism not Globalism.
    Solves all sorts of problems created by the MORONS in charge.

  • Posted By: VOTER444 @ 11/11/2008 4:00:34 PM

    Its going to be hard for anyone to find jobs when there are no jobs out there.10 million Americans out of work already....dont see 10 million jobs being created in this country anytime soon so adding 3 million more to the mix will not help.The auto industry must be saved not by a bailout but by a bankruptcy and a complete restructred plan for the future.

  • Posted By: VOTER444 @ 11/11/2008 2:42:20 PM

    Not a single person was making any statements about gas-guzzling SUV's until the gas prices soared thanks to speculators and big oil.Alot of people who have voiced their opinions dont understand how many jobs would be lost.Its not just factory workers.Its dealerships with parts,service,finance and sales personal who are not looped in with unions.Millions of people will be out of work adding to the ten million who already do not have jobs.

    • Posted By: archmsu @ 11/11/2008 3:15:38 PM

      I fully understand how many jobs will be lost! I don't care!! Industries that are too big to fail, are too Big!!!! We need to start showing some "tough love." People can find new jobs......................It's not the end of the world. Industries come and go. Why do we have to keep these compaines afloat with tax dollars? Look what happened to the airline industry!

    • Posted By: alfacanguro @ 11/11/2008 3:11:44 PM

      That's because the majority of Americans still believe in capitalism. If you want to live in a society where the government owns and provides for everything, including jobs, then you need to move to Sweden or China. Unlike many other countries, America's labor market is vibrant and very fluid. It may force those that live in the Rust Belt to relocate, change jobs, and perhaps even industries, but there are opportunities elsewhere. Artificially propping up dying industries and companies is not the way to reallocate labor.

  • Posted By: archmsu @ 11/11/2008 2:37:32 PM

    Let them fail.......People act like if the industry goes under our country will be destroyed. That's bogus!! It will be tough but those companies have gotten too big and need to be downsized. Maybw we actually have a new automaker in the US. Besides GM cars are crap!

  • Posted By: izme @ 11/11/2008 12:15:49 PM

    I like the idea that one financial expert stated and that is that the Congress could agree to bailout large corporations such as the auto manufacturing companies and AIG only if the CEO's who mismanganged the companies agree to resign and not take a golden parachute.

    • Posted By: Progressive American @ 11/11/2008 12:23:24 PM

      Good idea.

  • Posted By: Progressive American @ 11/11/2008 9:26:44 AM

    While I understand the reasoning behind having to bailout the three big American automakers, I still have to ask, what are these executives going to give up? I mean yes as tax payers their personal money will go to assist in these bailout plans. But these executive employees typically get extremely bloated salaries and stock options. So are these people going to cut back on their compensation for the good of the company? Because, clearly their business strategy has not been working and now they are near bankruptcy. Top management has clearly made terrible business decisions that produced below par products. The average Americans is furious at the fact we the people are giving handouts to a company who frankly does not produce a quality product. You don???t see BMW, Honda, or Toyota coming to the government for handouts. (For those of you who don???t know, they have auto plants in the southern states.)

    So if these automakers are going to the Americans people looking for a handout, our congressmen better have some solid stipulations in place.

    First, until theses companies pay back the Americans people, these bloated salaries better are brought way down. Yes some people might think government is crossing the line by dictating to the private sector what employees compensation should be, but if those companies are going to be borrowing mine and your money, then they shouldn???t have a choice.

    Second, and this is the most important, these failing automakers desperately need a restructuring program. Let???s face it, some these brands are not desirable. For example, why does ford still produce mercury? The mercury brand is a wasted time and effort just makes Ford (the base brand) and Lincoln (the luxury brand). Here???s a free consulting tip for General Motors:

    Brands to keep:
    ??? Chevy (base brand), Cadillac (luxury brand)
    ??? Saturn (base brand), Buick (luxury brand)
    ??? Saab

    Brands to discontinue:
    ??? GMC (wasted time and effort)
    ??? Pontiac (wasted time and effort) (the consumers know that the Saturn sky and the Pontiac solstice are the same car)

    Yes getting rid of these brands could hurt financial in the short term, but in the long run it will be worth it.

  • Posted By: trogers @ 11/10/2008 10:37:00 PM

    If we can send billions to Wall Street to bail out the financial masterminds who gambled and lost billions and begged Washington to cover their losses; we should be willing to help out Detroit. Yes, both Wall Street and Detroit are guilty of extreme greed and criminal stupidity. They deserve to be humiliated and investigated and punished for their bad behavior. But a failure of both Wall Street and Detroit would drag millions of Americans down with them. And their only mistake was believing that highly paid executives actually knew their ass from a hole in the ground. As we bail them out we should remember that they have to be watched very closely to protect them from themselves. Left to their own devices as they have been; they will revert to the same greed and stupidity that created this crisis. The idea that capitalism functions best through self regulation by capitalists belongs in the dumpster. We, the tax payers, have to bail them out and we have to become their probation officers checking up on them constantly to make sure the old, bad habits do not return.

  • Posted By: olderwiser @ 11/10/2008 7:30:57 PM

    I had this friend years ago who complained that our system of requiring people to work for money was cruel and should be overhauled by simply having a free money government store in all neighborhoods so that anyone who needed money could just go and withdraw as much as he wished for his needs. The deal was that the government would continue to print it until everybody got enough. It didn't make a lot of sense to me because I had always worked for money and thought it was a pretty good deal, but I respected him and didn't argue.
    He passed on. I only wish he could still be alive and see that his dream is beginning to come true. It starts with large banks, corporations and auto makers first, but I know that it will trickle down, Reaganlike, eventually to ordinary folk. Only the very rich are getting this deal now, but just be patient. A lot of people will like this. I'm probably going to find something to do for mine because I still like the old way. But, you can't quarrel with progress.

    • Posted By: tc125231 @ 11/10/2008 9:05:36 PM

      Sonny, I can more or less guarantee that I am as old as you are. I am just not suffering from early onset senility.

      Why do you write these fantastic pieces that relate to nothing except your dream world? If you are not suffering from dementia, or trying to become the conservative Kafka, you must be an idiot.

      Which is it?

  • Posted By: ohioman @ 11/10/2008 7:18:55 PM

    In this current time what some people call and economic slow down, I see it as more of an economic shake down. It is hard to believe in a country as the United States with countless unemployed or under employed people with little to know economic support and with supposive 47 million with no health care and God knows how many more under insured people who are struggling and losing their homes livelihoods and what little bit of the American dream that they have worked so hard to achieve slowling slipping away while corporate America has spent the last 20 years or so maximizing profit by moving factories overseas putting out poor quality products and then want to get in front of the line to asking to use our tax money to bail them out. I say "No new American jobs, No bail out".

  • Posted By: ohioman @ 11/10/2008 7:16:43 PM

    In this current time what some people call and economic slow down, I see it as more of an economic shake down. It is hard to believe in a country as the United States with countless unemployed or under employed people with little to know economic support and with supposive 47 million with no health care and God knows how many more under insured people who are struggling and losing their homes livelihoods and what little bit of the American dream that they have worked so hard to achieve slowling slipping away while corporate America has spent the last 20 years or so maximizing profit by moving factories overseas putting out poor quality products and then want to get in front of the line to asking to use our tax money to bail them out. I say "No new American jobs, No bail out".

  • Posted By: hatcojack @ 11/10/2008 6:09:53 PM

    don't give them a DIME ! FIRE all the top execs and bring in the japanese auto execs to show us how to run a company !!

  • Posted By: brian.reach @ 11/10/2008 1:17:35 PM

    The big car manufacturers were, yes, 1-greedy, 2-ignorant to the need for fuel efficiency, 3-irresponsible... but here's the thing: America can't see them go under. So... basically, we have to do SOMETHING. Require that they start making the most fuel-efficient (or fuel-free) cars in the world, in return for bailout, or make sure that the laid off employees are first in line for the new green jobs, or something. It's like a ticked-off parents letting their kid move back into the house after racking up a ton of credit card debt, or dropping out of school. You don't let them go homeless... we need to get back in front on technology, and it seems like everyone's finally learning their lesson.

    We can't let the car companies crash. Just because the CEOs don't deserve to be bailed out, doesn't mean the employees should all be thrown to the wolves. They've been working plenty hard.

    • Posted By: TalkSoup @ 11/10/2008 5:48:06 PM

      I personally think that any bailout should come with a detailed set of requirements as to how it's spent.

      I normally don;t watn to see governmetn involved in business, but if they're gving moeny to these companies then they have a right so adress how it's spent.

      First of all, since the management and CEO's failed to succeed, they need to have bonuses and pay scaled back in order to recieve taxpayer money.

      Just my thoughts...

  • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 11/10/2008 1:39:46 PM

    GM, Ford and Chrysler should file for bankruptcy, just like some of the airlines did.
    ,
    A bankruptcy judge could impose management salary freezes, dividend freezes, reduce pension payouts, renegotiate union contracts, and restructure dealership and maintenance agreements, all things the automotive companies have been unable or unwilling to do.

    And rather than just another taxpayer funded bailout, we need solutions that help as many of the affected as possible, but not without the industry taking part of the hit. The unions, the top management, the workers, the retirees, the taxpayers, the communities - all reaped the rewards when things were going well, it seems only fair for all to share the pain now that things aren't.

    Nobody should get off scott free since we all have some culpability, and nobody should take the brunt of the damage alone.

    If the taxpayers are going to be asked to foot the bill for the auto industry's mistakes, why not let the money go instead towards unemployment benefits, funds for retraining workers, interest-free loans for housing - we do it for communities ravaged by floods and hurricanes, why not for Michigan and other communities heavily tied to the auto industry? Yes, times will be tough, but no tougher than in states that have lost thousands of textile jobs, housing jobs, or other jobs in industries that have been decimated - without a bailout to help.

    Why is corporate welfare acceptable but individual welfare is not?

    In the meantime, let the companies be part of a bankruptcy settlement, with oversight and consequences, tied to performance and specific energy-saving goals, and let them emerge leaner and more competitive, or let them sink. Put the taxpayer money towards retraining, unemployment, housing help.

    But for heaven's sake, don't give the automakers a blank check - they've already demonstrated horribly poor management; why would we want to reward them for that?

    Why is a bankruptcy restructure seen as the worst solution? Handled correctly, is could be the best answer.

    • Posted By: pfwpearl @ 11/10/2008 2:34:32 PM

      C. McLean - I understand your viewpoint regarding filing for bankruptcy, but here's a question for everyone who thinks that is the solution for GM. If GM were to file for bankruptcy would you purchase a vehicle from them? I mean really, would you buy a car with a 10 year warranty from a company that is in Chapter 11 or 7? Would you risk purchasing without the guarantee that the warranty would be usable? Just wondering.

      • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 11/10/2008 4:30:58 PM

        I was born in Flint, Michigan, so yes, I would buy a GM car, assuming I was working and could afford ANY car. I flew on an airline that was under Chapter 11 so I don't perceive buying a car as all that risky; a bankruptcy restructuring would actually reassure me, rather than just a cash infusion with no checks and balances.

        You ask if I would risk the purchase without the warranty. The short answer is - getting up in the morning is a risk, the whole economy is a risk. However, the warranty may be something the government could stand behind as an incentive, as a way to lower the risk of investing - because that's what this is really about - in the future of the company and the future of the country. Would I take that risk? Yes. Would others? I can't say.

        There are no good solutions here, but lord knows, there are several very bad ones. We need to pick the one with the least amount of a pain, or at least, the one that spreads the pain as equitably as possible.

        And we all need to have some compassion for the people who will be hurt by an auto industry that is allowed to drown with no attempt at resuscitaion - loss of 3 million jobs can NOT be good for America, in any industry.

  • Posted By: Elaininpcola @ 11/10/2008 1:51:49 PM

    If the big auto makers declare bankruptcy, do the retirees still draw their huge pensions and free health care?

    • Posted By: jazzmanjim @ 11/10/2008 2:05:08 PM

      No. The max benefit from the PBGC is 51,750/yr. They might be elegible for the health care tax credit which pays (at most) 65% pf elegoble health care costs.

      If you were an autoworker (past or present) and did not have any other retirement savings then you are scr***d.

      • Posted By: Elaininpcola @ 11/10/2008 2:08:35 PM

        Thanks, Jazzman... $51k sounds like a lot more than most retirees have to live on, though. It's funny that after a lifetime of huge salaries, most auto workers have nothing in savings....

        • Posted By: pfwpearl @ 11/10/2008 2:36:12 PM

          You assume the salaries are huge - where do you get your numbers?

          • Posted By: jazzmanjim @ 11/10/2008 4:17:58 PM

            The cost to GM (including benefits) is ~$45/hr (over $90k/yr). I call that huge.

  • Posted By: Rog123 @ 11/10/2008 2:07:43 PM

    One important item that does not get reported is the lavish buyouts and pensions that the automakers have been giving all those hundreds of thousands that they have let go recently. If they had acted like other industries (except Wall Street of course!), they would have been left with a lot more cash than now to be used to survive. To those of us in other industries experiencing zero or minimal severances, the incentives given to auto workers (blue and white collar both) looks quite excessive.

    • Posted By: pfwpearl @ 11/10/2008 2:30:37 PM

      Because helping people not starve to death in this economy is bad how? Can't sell a house in Michigan - from the news I gather ist's the same everywhere. So now GM is bad for trying to ease the pain when they let people go? Are you people never happy? What did we do to you to make you hate us so?

      • Posted By: Elaininpcola @ 11/10/2008 2:52:43 PM

        Pearl, seeing those big buyouts as being wrong is not unreasonable. If you're included in that group, what was your buyout? 3 or four years worth of pay? No one wants families to fail financially, but the auto workers have been coddled and overpaid for decades. Did they save anything for a rainy day?

        • Posted By: pfwpearl @ 11/10/2008 2:57:04 PM

          Wasn't offered a buyout - not eligible, but for the record the people were offered about 6 months salary to walk away from the company. I have a lot of coworkers who just took it because they see the writing on the wall - no buyout next round just a box and an escort to the door. They were not offered years of salary - where do you get that idea?

          • Posted By: Elaininpcola @ 11/10/2008 3:05:30 PM

            Pearl, I'm sorry for your situation and can understand. I'm a Federal employee who was caught in the base closures and had to short sell my house, and relocate to another state in which I knew no one. The job situation is bad all over the country, but so many of the Detroit workers won't consider moving. Sometimes that may be the only way people have to keep feeding their kids.

    • Posted By: Elaininpcola @ 11/10/2008 2:26:58 PM

      Well said, Rog, and true.

  • Posted By: pfwpearl @ 11/10/2008 2:42:51 PM

    I'm curious, how many of you spouting off about letting the Big3 go down, what do you drive? Fuel efficient cars each and every one of you? Are you all people who have made the very best choice when it comes to getting off of big oil reliance? Again, just curious.
    I am a Big3 contract worker - no pension, no huge salary, pay my own healthcare benefits. There are more of us at the Big3 that employees. At least as far as white collar jobs go. What would you have to say to me? I am trying my best to keep my job, do a good job at what I am tasked to do. Pay my bills, spend my paycheck in my community buying goods and services from all the small companies around me. I am one person, multiply that by all of us. Sure the companies have made errors, big ones. I was conflicted from the start about taking an automotive job - didn't want to work for the evil empire, but it became apparent quickly that if I wanted to eat I needed to work. In Michigan that is pretty much automotive. I lived in California and worked in the tech when that was booming, but then came rolling blackouts, Enron manipulated energy price increases, lack of cash flow for tech companies to keep the server farms going and pretty soon I found myself out of work with no where to go but back home. I've already been through one complete failure - moved, started over from zero and built back my life. I own a house and have a kid in college. I just want what you all want - a decent living, in a place I can stand. If the Big3 goes under there is an entire state immediately down the tubes, many others to follow. For the record, people aren't getting pensions anymore, they have 401k's like the rest of you. Healthcare benefits are still a part of the package, but hey you have to give people something to live in Detroit! Salaries are in line with what college educated people make for white collar workers. Line workers have had it good - but you cannot blame them for getting the best deal they could while giving the best years of their lives to a physically hard job (if you haven't worked an assembly line you have NO idea).
    I don't know what the answer is, but I am saddened to see so many people be so heartless when we are talking about people. People just like you who have families and bills. Laugh, love, cry and die just like you. This is America where I thought we stood up for each other. Looks like maybe I was wrong and the country is full of a bunch of "me first - me only" people who gladly drove the SUV's (someone bought them) and now only care about themselves. Shame on you. These are human beings you are talking about - not throw away automans. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

  • Posted By: patricia 4iris @ 11/10/2008 2:00:10 PM

    GM is a white elephant (pun intended for all Repugs) that belongs to the last century. They refused to build their future and have resisted every innovation - whether its building greener and leaner cars rather than gas guzzlers or offering cars with better emissions standards. They've been on the wrong side of energy reform and forward-looking proposal. By the laws of capitalism they deserve to fold now. They are the dinosaurs of the past - why now do they need a socialist bail-out????

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse