if Detroit wants help it should only be given if they stop building gasoline auto's
if Detroit wants help it should only be given if they stop building gasoline auto's
The answer to their plight is simple: Chapter 11. This is what every other business enterprise does when their management and union employees manage to run things into the ground. Chapter 11 will allow businesses to start over with new, competent management, a new and reasonable Union contract, and a write-down of existing debt.
Besides, what makes the auto industry so unique that American taxpayers must bail them all out? Where are we going to draw the line with these bailouts? And does anyone think for a moment that we are ever going to see any of the "loans" repaid? The Big 3's market share has been shrinking for the last 40 years, and they don't have any competitive product in the pipeline to generate the profits that will be needed to repay those loans. The money would be better spent paying their employees unemployment comp and retraining for other fields.
If we are going to subsidize the Big 3, we should simply nationalize them. Wipe-out all of the existing shareholders, fire the entire Board and officer ranks, and take it over lock, stock and barrel. Hire professional managers from the Japanese or German automotive industries, and give them carte blanche to eliminate Union contracts, and to set a long-term course to rebuild them into responsible and competitive business organizations.
I still remember the K-car commercials that Lee Iacocca did back in the '70s when he was drumming up business trying to save Chrysler after going hat in hand to the government for loans. He cut his pay to $1. Let's hope that Congress watches over taxpayer money when they dole out bailouts to the current crop of auto execs who pay themselves $5-$10 mill per year running their businesses into the ground.
Our automakers have been digging themselves into a grave for years. GM, Ford, and Dodge-Chrysler haven't been able to design and make reliable, economical, efficient cares like Honda, Toyota, and Mazda. Their insistence on manufacturing large, gas-guzzling macho-mobiles, huge pick-ups and SUVs, has been like watching dinosaurs continuing to breed on the way to extinction. And now they, too, want to be bailed out for their misguided marketing, bad engineering and quality, and inability to meet the consumers' needs and wants?! Give me a break!
seems to me automakers make what people want, than all of a sudden W's oil buddies decide toraise gas to $4 a gallon, so now it the auto industries fault for giving all the SUV crazed people what they wanted. If gas didn't go t0 $4 the demand for SUV's would still be strong as ever.
Call me crazy, but if I had a business, i'd make what sells. All the SUV buyers had other options and could have got a "car" to meet their needs, but they had to have more than they needed.
This is an incredibly fallacious argument. If everybody wanted SUVs, why did the Big3 spend billions on advertising? Also, this argument ignores the people who want to buy well made, small, fuel efficient cars. Where do they go? Right: the Asian manufacturers... How about excellent handling Autobahn cruisers? Oh, right: the European manufacturers. The Big3 treat any car that doesn't fit the "Be American. Buy American" Let's drive across the prairies conception as a niche market that isn't worth their time.
I believe it is you who are wrong here, fuel efficent cars were available via the big three, but the SUV craze took on a life of it's own. Still, they were producing fuel efficient vehicles but were not as popular, BUT, they were available. Your arguement that the only way to fuel efficientcy was to by imports is fallacious and bad thinking. Everyone who buys a import sends our money to a foreign corp. As those profits leave America there is less money staying here to keep our economy moving. Thinking such as yours is part of the problem rather thn part of the solution. Please put on some common sense.
Don't blame consumers. There was a market for smaller, fuel-efficient cars before gas went to $4 a gallon. The Big 3 were simply lazy, and wanted to make money the easy way by riding a fad with SUVs, and abandoned the passenger car market to foreign brands. Placing all of your eggs in one basket is called MISMANAGEMENT. Toyota, Honda and Nissan spread their investments across a broad range of vehicles, which is why they were able to fall back on shifting mfg from SUVs to small cars. Why should American taxpayers encourage this type of irresponsible behavior by bailing out management. Let them all file for Chapter 11, a new management team, and a new more reasonable Union contract.
let's face it everyone, this has been a long time comming. When I dirve all I see is foreign cars on the road, the fact is that the big three started making crap in the early '70s and we the people punished them by buying foreign cars. When the big three figured out they couldn't get away with it anymore the started making changes and turned around, however, we the people kept buying the foreign stuff and never came back home. Than came the Free Trade Agreement that let the foreign companies compete unfairly in our econemy and forced the big three to outsource in order to stay competitive.
Several years ago I worked near NYC and Boston, I estimate that at that time 75% of vehicles on the road were foreign, so a good part of Detroit's demise belongs to we the people.
In our economy it takes x amount of money for a family to live a decent life, in Japan and other countries it is not even close.
So the greed that starts at the top extends all the way down to us, we are not willing to support our own lifestyle.
I'm not putting all the blame on us, the compensation and bonuses extended to the upper management in the corporations in this Country is outrageous and needs to stop, so if the big three want us to bail them out than changes at the top need to be trimmed by at least 60-70% with bonuses given only for performance, and that also must be limited.
I have brought cars made by the big three since the early 80's and have never had a major problem with any of them, most I have put 150k miles or more.
So to conclude, it's time for us to support our own economy and stop sending our money overseas, and hope that Detroit follows suite and stops sending our jobs overseas.
Um wh4752, a Ford car can not even compare to the quality of a Japanese made Honda. Honda makes very few models and only makes very subtle changes to them each year, thereby, putting their resources into quality rather than quantity. How many models does Ford make? About a dozen; spreading out their resources into a dozen different models instead of putting it into quality. Ford also anticipates the money they need to make in the aftermarket too for parts. They are completely aware that their parts will fail or deteriorate within a couple of years, and they know the aftermarket presents even more revenue opps. It's all carefully planned out. Manufacturing all those parts for about a dozen different models for the aftermarket. Their dumb strategy has forced consumers to look for quality with longevity...HONDA!
I purchase quality, which in the longrun will save me money.
Wagoner made $16 miiiion last year. I bet Honda or Toyota's CEO made much less. What a racket. Let's give them more..
Hiroshi Okuda, CEO of Toyota, made $903K last year.
Why is it you would encourage ideas that would only make our situation worse?? Would it not be a better idea to discuss possible solutions to put our Country back on track????
you obviosuly can't see the forrest for the tree's, look at the big picture for once instead of whats good for "ME". The fact that 75% of cars are foreign means all profit from those sales flow out of the US and just continues to esclate the international debt, that money dosn't get recurlated here and causes inflation.
And as I said I've had big 3 cars since the early 80's with no problems other than normal ware and tare repairs.
THINK ABOUT THE "BIG PICTURE".
I bet your Big 3 cars are just as good as your English!
My spelling may not be as good as yours, but were not here discussing English 1, our economy is going to hell in a hand basket, and your only input is my poor spelling? If you want to critique my spelling, at least after you have, add something intelligent to the conversation at hand.
The problem with Detroit is simply this: the greedy auto company managers over many years gave the unions all that they wanted in order to maintain profitability and avoid protracted labor strikes. When in some cases they couldn't avoid a strike over some issue, they then just priced the costs of those strikes into the already-inflated prices of the shoddy cars they sell, and made all of us pay for their excesses. It's just another case of another industry coming to the fat cash cow in Washington for it's place at the udder, and trying to do this before yet another industry beats them to it or the milk runs dry. To wit, as an example of the UAW's hubris, the UAW has said that their free lifetime medical benefits are never going to be on the negotaiting table---never! Well, my friends at the UAW, we now live in a different era where we should all have to share the costs of our benefits. Do they mean that we, the taxpayers must pay for the cost of the "poor" auto worker's employee benefits when many taxpayers have none at all? I consider myself lucky; as a white-collar worker in retirement: I have to pay about 75% of my medical premiums while my former employer pays an amount capped at Year 2000 levels! But I share in the costs as the alternative of no benefits or prohibitively expensive benefits would be far worse. Any bailout of Detroit ought to force partial or complete abrogation of union contracts so that those workers start sharing costs and are on the same footing as most taxpayers in this country.
WoW, actually is mistyped when I started and entered "SoS" - I guess in a way that sums it up. The auto industry wants billions to keep building the cars we don't need - their whole problem is that people don't want what they are building and can no longer to afford to drive what they already bought from Detroit. Sure, lets help them, but make them break their ties to "Big Oil" and re-tool to build cars that people can afford to buy and operate....!! Don't threated the country with massive job losses if GM is allowed to fail, in 2000 they were responsible for killing electric cars in California in favor of gas guzzling HUMMERs and Suburbans.
Hmmm, what good is a college degree? I will tell you. I personally grew up as a low income African American in a single family household. My mother had to raise 7 of us alone. I would collect cans on the side of the road to afford a bag of rice or box of corn flakes. I worked full time in high school. After a life of constant struggles and setbacks I managed to eventually earn an engineering degree. Let me tell you, my life totally changed after receiving my diploma and my first paycheck as an engineer. I went from being miserable to very happy in one day. Graduation day.
Ironhead, well, you're right in one respect, there was a college educated person that helped us get into this mess.......
His name is Bush, George Dubya Bush........but you can't let him represent all college educated people, after all, there are many high schoolers smarter than he is.
yes and where were all the educated people a few months back to see the broader picture of what now is like. guess they all had their heads stuck where the sun don't shine.
You obviously have missed the point. WE ALL HAVE A CHOICE. If you CHOOSE to work in a factory instead of going to college and earn a degree and EARN THE OPPORTUNITY to make a high salary, then that is a CHOICE that an individual has made for themselves.
You ask, "What good is a college degree?" That mentality breeds a nation of under-educated people and WE AS A COUNTRY will fall behind of innovation worldwide. An educated person would see the the broad picture and the longterm implications.
The working man has a choice to pick himself up by his suspenders and do something instead of looking for someone to blame. Honestly, I think the unions have lost sight of the big picture. They need re-focus their mission.
yes and what good is a college degree ? not much in my book. seems to me the people with the college degrees are the ones that have us in this fine big mess we're in now.
I suspected the very same thing when the government started bailing people out. Slippery slope, anyone?
If the $25 billion loan goes to retooling to build almost fuel-free cars like the Volt, the savings on foreign oil purchases alone could pay back many multiples of the principle -- ever year! -- leaving T. Boone Picken's program for freedom from foreign oil dependence in GM's dust.
Free upgrade to plug-in hybrid?
Reported by Tom Krishner, AP Auto Writer Monday, July 21, 2008: ..."lithium-ion battery packs needed to power even a small car now cost in excess of $10,000..."
A couple of years ago, I came up with the fun dollar-savings equation that: if America needed only half as much imported oil (meaning 5 million bbl/day then) and if we needed to pay only half the price ($30/bbl then) due to said lowered demand, then, we could save $165 billion a year (by spending only 5,000,000 bbl/day X 365 days X $30 instead of 10,000,000 bbl/day X 365 days X $60 = a saving of $164,250,000,000/year)...
...or, exactly enough to subsidize buidling the 16.5 million cars and trucks we manufacture every year as LITHIUM, PLUG-IN hybrids -- at $10,000 per vehicle!
Now, with oil recently approaching the $150/bbl range, we could be shipping $500 billion more a year overseas; potentially justifying any form of subisidy for the manufacture of lithium plug-in hybrids.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/07/21/financial/f184312D31.DTL&type=autos
******************
For 30 years it has been known that building lithium ion batteries with silicon wires (instead of carbon wires) could yield ten times the power holding ability but, because silicon wires expanded and contracted too much as they cycled, they quickly destroyed themselves. The development of silicon nano wires ??? about a thousandth of the width of a sheet of paper -- has solved that drawback -- while potentially making lithium ion batteries more stable (safer) at the same time!
Near term, only the anode side of the batteries will be manufactured with nano wires, yielding the quadruple jump (up powering GM???s Volt to go 160 miles on one charge instead of 40?). Long term, manufacturing the cathode side with silicon nano wires is expected to reach the ten multiple target (introducing hybrid, long distant trucks?).
http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2008/january9/nanowire-010908.html
I agree with you, but what effect will 16 million people plugging in every night to charge there battires have on the electrical infrastructure? So we need to greatly increase our electric infrastructure before moving forward with your plan 100%. A good inner mediate and easy solution would be to convert existing cars to run on natural gas, we have lots of it and it burns much cleaner than gasoline.
The auto company and big oil have shelved or bought out any innovation in favor of huge Hummers and SUV's...Sorry they should not give one red cent dime more to the stupid people. This should have been done 10 years ago. Have a competition were the brightest develop the cars now and the government should fund them, not these bemoths
more retiirees then workers and pensioners living muchl.onger then expected puts tghe American auto companies on disastrous slide thatb can not be helped by printing upmore money. They need to have reorganization and bankruptcy protection. Unless you tax the foriegn automakers t substantially o support all those retirees,the system cann not continue in such an unequal way.
Wow, a lot of hatred of captialism here.
GM, Ford, Chrysler, built what was profitable. The Suv for a long time. Do you blame them? I don't . You have to build what people are going to buy. Up till last year it was SUV's, then it became fuel efficient cars. Now I feel you will see some movement towards a middle groud solution.
Regardless, the Detroit 3 big problem now is not lact of fuel efficent cars, it is a economy in shambles brought down by poor lending standrads in housing, consumers who bought more than they could afford, cheap money that shot housing prices through the roof creating the housing bubble, and finally the collapes of the credit markets because of mess all of it created. Add to that oil prices that went up more not because of supply and demand but because people were hedgeing against inflation. You got a perfect storm.
A lot of what is causing Detriots problems is not because they produced too many SUV's. It that was the case why is Toyota, Nissan, even Honda down double digets.
If these companies aren't bailed out the government will spend more cleaning up the mess than it cost to save them!
Wall Street might not have deserved the bailout (they didn't), but Detroit does!
You must understand, srd275, that none of that below is even hinting at a hate toward capitalism, but instead bemoans the contemptible abuse of capitalism by our Detroit automobile manufacturers and the concomitant excellent way in which the Japanese used capitalism, which we taught them under Mac Arthur by the way. The Japanese won the industry. The crowning irony is the ultimate result in which Detroit begs for government money to attempt to heal the results of that abuse of which I speak. Government money to rescue private business is pure socialism. Get it?? Catch???
Ah, Business. The great American innovation. Competitive business. Risk. Take a chance. Produce something useful, sell it, and either make a profit or go broke. The risk of going broke allows you to profit in large quantities that can put a royal treasury in the shade. It's the possibility of failure and loss that justifies such fortunes. Ergo, do good business and prosper or do bad business and go broke. Socialist countries fail because they do not do American Business.
Detroit! Detroit! Are you there? Have you no shame? Have you lost the courage to play the game fair and simply go broke? The Japanese who beat you hands down would go broke in their infancy and the CEO would take his life for having failed. You will give your CEO millions of dollars for failing. Have you no pride? Don't take your life, for heaven's sake, but could you at least turn down the salary and the bonus?? Not only is you life not a stake. Your lavish existence is enhanced. Just what is our purpose of rewards for excellence if failure is so rewarding???
Marx, Lenin, Stalin, and all the others are smirking in their shrouds at your rotting condition as you beg for your government to save you from your failure to understand capitalism. Socialist cars never run. They break down and burn oil on the road trailing smoke behind and the windshields and trunks leak. That is why Russia finally gave up and joined the world of capitalism. Has this country gone nuts??
Our future CEO's are destined to be fat and lazy, incompetent and arrogant in their riches. Business failure is supposed to leave a trail of unsuccessful rusting junk behind as a monument to the indolent, stupid, and ineffective louts who run businesses into the ground for their own enrichment. Now our Harvard Business School graduates will insist on such debris in their wake as a measure of their wealth which they squeezed from the very life of their products. I am ashamed to witness this.
As long as Detroit's car makers are proud of what ever traditions they are holding steadfast continuing making unprofitable cars till the very end that do not appeal to the US masses or anybody for that matter, they will continue to loose money even with a bail-out. As long as Detroit car makers can still breathe make the change. Produce cars/vehicles that appeal to US and oversea consumers.
This 700 Billion Comes from Taxes Acumulates for this End-Year...Wondering how they're going to floor on table the financial year Budget. At least the sitimulus package we know should come from OIL company tax relief given by GOP and cut By Obama.
Hey Obama hasn't cut anything yet and we will see how he and Biden describe rich and I bet you it goes below $100,000 so a lot more Americans are going to pay higher taxes under Obama then they did under Bush and the economy will sink even further. Hello Carter II!
Enter comments if any for reporting abuse
Discuss