In Defense of Detroit

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: antiwelfare4big3 @ 11/14/2008 4:34:37 PM

    no really what they should do is fold up go broke we shouldnt even give 2 craps if they do nobody cares if we loose our homes or cars or our buiss why should we give a crap let the uaw suck some brown crap for once
    remember the teamsters nobody even cares who they represent anymore we cant compete in the global market with the unions so hit the road

  • Posted By: JonHer @ 11/14/2008 4:32:31 PM

    1. Obama will save them all at a terrible cost to non-union workers called taxpayers
    2. Buy-out (not bail-out) the unions; their time has passed (anyone afraid of work-place accidents anymore?)
    3. Sooner or later, it's time to pay the piper
    4. Who can afford these automobiles they make?
    5. Screw those states for not seeing this coming...I did 10 years ago...so did a lot of people, but no one listened

  • Posted By: copper454 @ 11/14/2008 4:32:19 PM

    There is still no logical reason in this article to bail out GM.

    3% hike in unemployment? That's a "doomsday" scenario first of all. And even if it were true, we get a 3% unemployment fluctuation or more every business cycle. Should we bail out every business that fails every business cycle?

    The fact is, people still need cars. If GM drops out of the market, someone else will fill the void and begin buying from American suppliers.

    Think about the economic incentives we're putting in place here. If we bail out GM, what's to stop other manufacturing companies from merging and consolidating so that they can become "too big to fail", and thus never be held accountable for bad decisions.

    If I'm a medium-sized business that the government would not bail out, and I see my taxes go to bail out GM, I'm going to merge with a bunch of other companies FAST, then, together, we'll make stupid, shortsighted decisions (like over-investing in SUV's), and hopefully we'll have enough employees and lobbyists in Washington that we'll get a bailout too!

    GM is not entitled to taxpayers' money. GM is a private company accountable to its shareholders.

  • Posted By: Fisherman144 @ 11/14/2008 4:32:18 PM

    For decades the Big Auto manufacturers have been in bed with Big Oil....ignoring the necessity for non-fossil fuels. Hydrogen fuel cell engines and hybrids with electric power would have solved our dependence on gas many years ago. Unfortunately greed and outright larceny has prevented this from happening. Every time a patent was approved for a more efficient carborator, engine, or fuel savings, it was purchased by either Big Oil or Big Auto and prevented from reaching the market. Our government has been very much aware of this behavior and done nothing.

    Let the Auto Manufacturers go bankrupt. They don't deserve a nickle more from the taxpayers. Force the CEOs and the wealthy large-block stock holders to give back the millions of dollars they have stolen from us.

  • Posted By: AguilarJ @ 11/14/2008 4:31:48 PM

    Why should we save the Big Three, when they were against (I'll name them) efficiency standards, environmental automobile productions, changeover to electric cars, universal health, etc. (okay I'll just stop there to name a few). These industries have done nothing for their country except keep it dependent upon foreign oil, and keeping our soldiers overseas. They have squandered the monies that we have given them, and they have taken money that wasn't rightfully theirs from other industries that would have made the U.S. less dependent on foreign oil. They and their managers have cashed out with golden parachutes, and have left their labor "units" (we call them people) to die without healthcare or benefits. What do we owe them again? How will they restructure when they get the money? Will they st op fighting efficiency standards and impliment them today? Or, will they just hem and haw and put out these gas-guzzlers like they always do? Hum...

  • Posted By: MortyR @ 11/14/2008 4:30:15 PM

    Writing TV commercials for major carmakers several years ago, I got to work closely with executives and engineers in Detroit. By their own admission, this is a textbook case of smug and complacent individuals who have turned a blind eye to public safety and the environment, and who have lived life for the past 50 years assuming that the rest of America owes them a living. If there were some way to burn this industry to the ground and start again from scratch, that would be my choice. But as long as we are in this fix, and since they've turned us all into hapless victims of their own complacent greed, why can't Congress make a deliberate effort to pattern this "new" American automobile industry after the good-thinking carmakers in the rest of the world?

  • Posted By: beoneal @ 11/14/2008 4:30:10 PM

    The Big 3 have had ongoing problems with labor costs, retirement benefits, and poor quality cars for decades. Its about time they falter and crumble. Maybe when they recover after bankruptcy management and labor will modernize their practices so they produce a competitive, dependable product. So long have days gone when you can make $60,000 plus with barely a high school education. Like anything else, evolve or become extinct.

  • Posted By: jfelcon @ 11/14/2008 4:27:51 PM

    ANY business that wants a bailout (the auto makers, American Express, banks, etc.) should have all high level executives and members of the board of directors required to do 3 things: 1) immediately offer their resignations, 2) sign binding agreements not to work in the industry for a period of 5 years, 3) return all compensation (salary, bonuses, and benefits in excess of those provided for the "regular" employees) received in the lesser of the last 18 months or the term of their employment.

    At least that would eliminate the incompetence that drove these businesses to need a bailout and obviate the possibility of managers' simply taking their bad decisions to the next "victim."

    I wonder how many bailout requests the government would receive if those were the rules.

  • Posted By: mj3710 @ 11/14/2008 3:59:44 PM

    Its easy to say let the big 3 go under and everyone says its all their fault. Well what about the banks we are helping, It not my fualt the were lending to people that really couldnt afford those big houses. But we are helping them. Whats the difference. When banks go under and the cry for help everyone say oh ok lets help them even though they also did it themselves. Go ahead let the big 3 go under but it will be a domino effect and someday it will affect everyone of you that are not wanting to help. The mom and pop store they go eat lunch at, staples that supply the copy paper, gas stations that are used to fill up the new cars being shipped, the parts store that supplies the parts, NOW DO YOU GET IT? Its easy to say let them go under but somewhere down the line it will get each and everyone of you. Just wait and see. And for all of you that think auto workers make all the kinds of money you would be wrong. And I know for I am a wife of an auto worker that has been with the company for 36 years and I have been with my company for 6 years and I bring home just as much as he does. We pay full office visits for the docotrs, we dont have co-pays and have not ever had co-pays for office visits. So for everyone thinks they know what we get make sure you know the facts before you state we make $30,40 or $50 on hour not even close.

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/14/2008 4:27:13 PM

      It is obvious now thgat the greedy homeowners will not get much help, and so should not the undeserved others. If you unions (and your vote counts there) will renegotiate contracts promptly - you probably will not lose your job, even under Chapter 11. If they stay their ground, - if not now then in couple years you will lose your job for good (nobody can be competitive if he spends 50% more per produced car than hos competitiors). Good luck.

    • Posted By: antiquity @ 11/14/2008 4:14:11 PM

      I would never say that workers were responsible for this tragedy. How could they be? The damage that will occur is mind-boggling, and it rests solely with management. Cars ARE being made in America, just not by GM or Ford; at least, that's what the future looks like. I am also sympathetic to your statement that auto workers don't make a ton of money. As a former Teamster myself, there is a lot of misinformation out there, and the plant workers are not coming out rich and famous in any of this.

      The corporation is an inanimate entity; it doesn't care what happens to the people it hires. That's why it is so important to provide the assistance to the workers, not to the management, if GM and Ford get any help at all. My fear is that they will not, and the ripple effects will be massive, and will run up the unemployment rate to over 10% easily. But you and your family didn't deserve this.

  • Posted By: antiwelfare4big3 @ 11/14/2008 4:27:11 PM

    and to the idiot who wrote this article i grew up across from 15 stores that walmart put out of buissness did anyone help them no did anyone care how many jobs are lost daily because of that??? we are a global economy now nobody cares why do you think everyone comes here for jobs they come here for section 8 housing and food stamps if we didnt have that gm wouldnt have labor problems hell everyother industry is using imigrant labor they might as well then my piece of crap suburban would only cost 20 grand then i wouldnt care if it fell apart in 3 years like big3 pos do

  • Posted By: antiquity @ 11/14/2008 3:43:35 PM

    Had those mega corps started years ago to build the kind of vehicles that consumers would buy, they wouldn't be in the pickle they are in. Management makes the decisions that others are expected to follow , and when the barnyard refuse hits the fan, management is the last one to leave, finally demanding compensation for their hard work.

    You cannot blame anything on anyone else other than the management of any company, in this case the remnant of american auto manufacturers. They are not system thinkers, they are top-down, classically ignorant management types from the business schools that brought us Enron. They too were of the belief that they were hiring only the best and the brightest - but failed to understand that there is NO best and brightest, only those the company hires from the almost unlimited pool of applicants. Enron too killed the sacred cow, ruined the lives of all their employees, and were the last one's standing, the last to go out the door, all the time proclaiming the value of their management thinking.

    So too will it be with GM and Ford; Chrysler is already dead.

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 11/14/2008 3:50:05 PM

      " Had those mega corps started years ago to build the kind of vehicles that consumers would buy, they wouldn't be in the pickle they are in."

      True. They were in love with huge SUVs. Then the price of gas went up, and they didn't have much in the way of a backup line of products.

      • Posted By: antiquity @ 11/14/2008 3:57:46 PM

        GM worked on a profit per unit basis; in other words, building the Envoy, Escalade, etc, sold at a potential of some 10K per vehicle out the door. Few cars could match that. They will take that mindset to their graves.

        • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 11/14/2008 4:26:11 PM

          Yep. There's nothing like blind greed, is there?

  • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/14/2008 4:20:41 PM

    Obama supporters, where are you? So loud before the elections, and now when your guy is for immediate bailout - where are your words of support? Started understanding now that instead of getting monet from riches into your pocket you will have to pay them? Wait, it is only the beginning.

    • Posted By: Doc Howl @ 11/14/2008 4:24:49 PM

      Two things:

      1. Obama isn't president yet. Don't get all wrapped around the axle yet.

      2. Unlike the GOP, the rest of the country does not feel the need to march in lockstep. Obama can and will do things some of us disagree with. This isn't a direct democracy.

  • Posted By: good conscience @ 11/14/2008 4:23:13 PM

    I fully support "myvoice63's" comments. In fact, I don't need to restate what s/he has already written. I am in general in favor of labor unions, as long as very comprehensive oversight of them is enforced. But the unions that work "for" the auto industry are dirty and crooked through and through. You don't have to go far to find heinous stories of the way the union members have sandbagged management. They have literally stolen millions out of the coffers of the industry, and they should be held accountable. I say that the big 3 should go into reorganization under Ch 11. They could still operate and their people could be paid a fair, living wage. An incentive program that promotes rapid development of green cars needs to be put into place asap.
    Although your average auto worker is highly skilled in a workplace that requires a good deal of skill, most of them do not hold college degrees. If they want to earn executive salaries, they should be required to attend school and train to be one. We have been way too soft on them. I happen to be a very liberal democrat who voted for Obama, by the way. But toxic mold and cancers are the same, no matter where they are found. Get some Chemo, Detroit!!!

  • Posted By: antiwelfare4big3 @ 11/14/2008 4:22:29 PM

    they say by january gm stocks will be almost worthless so the senate wants to take ownership in that???
    we havent even began to bailout bad mortgages and we have to bail out car companies you dont see the chicken shiet uaw reps at other plants cause they get laughed off the competition produces better product better r and d and we have to bail out the fat slobs off the industry cmon obama did you need the uaw vote im not sharing my wealth with them

  • Posted By: Lisa in Dallas @ 11/14/2008 4:22:27 PM

    I'm sorry but I am done with the bailout for any company and now just read that 3 major cities wanted part of it. I am for the american people getting all of the bailout money. We would most certainly spend the money wisely and restart this economy. The bailout money going to these companies is being used for pensions and disgusting bonues for executives who couldn't get their companies solvent. Why should any of them get a bonus - 95% of americans not only are not getting bonuses but most are losing their jobs so the executives can keep their bonuses. I say no bailout to any more companies - Look at AIG - the money they got went for a huge corporate party costing millions while their company has gone broke and oh yes, they also get to keep their millions in bonus money - bonus money for WHAT!!!! to scam America!

  • Posted By: pdnrick @ 11/14/2008 2:41:11 PM

    Author has a very good point about the speed of reolution of a Chap 11 filing by such a huge business entity. Delphi, a Tier 1 supplier to the automotive assembly industry went through almost 2 years of court work.
    I am ideologically opposed to bail outs, but the cost of such a huge business failure (read as industry failure) in our economy would be disastorous. Congress should proceed wisely, not ideologically, and help out-but with "tough love"

    • Posted By: YashBudini @ 11/14/2008 4:15:13 PM

      I doubt the CEO's will be going to bed without their supper.

  • Posted By: antiwelfare4big3 @ 11/14/2008 4:14:49 PM

    its called competition, if i with 12 employees have to do it why cant they ill take a 1 billion bailout because i cant manage my buissness
    and when we do bail these companies they still spend like crazy
    the united states has the only welfare system in the world, (proven fact) and it just keeps getting bigger and bigger

  • Posted By: myvoice63 @ 11/14/2008 4:11:36 PM

    The Big 3 Auto Makers should not get a cash bailout. It will not be used appropriately. They need to purge their current top management people, get rid of the unions, cut their production and factory in half and the governement assistance should go directly into assistance for the employees who will be laid-off. The auto makers will still make money on their auto parts for all the gazillion models out there in the market. The federal assistance should be in the same vein as unemployment money as well as education and training in another field and relocation assistance for employment in another state or city. That would make the most sense to me and tax payers money would be benefitting the employees directly without interferrance from the auto makers.

    The big key here is GET RID OF THE UNIONS! No organization should have that much control over a business. That's NOT the American way. The unions literally waged a war on America's auto industry pitting employees against employers. If you refused to join the union, you would be outcasted and strong-armed into joining. That's not how a business should be run. The UAW and the Big 3 auto makers are the American equivalent of Shiite and Sunni fighting in the middle east. DISGRACEFUL!

  • Posted By: len77 @ 11/14/2008 4:08:38 PM

    If there is such an urgency, why isn't management making those 'tough' decisions. If I could see drastic steps being taken, to improve their plight, I may be more willing to go along with the bailout. As it now appears, the want the money, but what is being offered from their side of the table? nothing?

  • Posted By: rwacziarg @ 11/14/2008 4:06:42 PM

    What utter and complete nonsense. They are undeserving but they deserve our help? What great logic!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse