BUSINESS

A Risk Worth Taking

Many ethical subprime lenders still manage to make plenty of money.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: austin c @ 11/21/2008 9:44:34 AM

    The title of the article 'The risk worth taking' sound scary itself. Are we in casino business ? Did Greenspan and the CEO's of the troubled institutions like AIG, countrywide,wachovia, wamu, indymac... made the same remark when engaging in subprime mortage lending ? The subprime mortgage itself is a kind of high risk lending, contrary to normal bank lending practice. The Clinton administration has relaxed the restrictions on subprime loans, thus increasing the scale of subprime lending default.

    • Posted By: austin c @ 11/21/2008 5:32:41 PM

      Please read the NY times story about Henry Cisneros, Clinton's HUD secretary
      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/business/19cisneros.html

  • Posted By: samta69 @ 11/21/2008 12:23:46 PM

    austin, don't be blaming Clinton for the stupidity of the banking industry. Good grief. Did you even read this article?

  • Posted By: Dragonheartxp @ 11/19/2008 9:37:55 PM

    IF a Auto Maker files for CHapter 11 grab your hat because a Stock Market free Fall will follow.
    I look for the stock market to bottom out between 2,500-5,000......THINK ABOUT IT....and get ready!

  • Posted By: FTBallesteros @ 11/19/2008 2:01:45 PM

    Regarding the story "A Risk Worth Taking" the real story is not on page two but continues to make headlines as to the why the CDFI Industry makes and should make the headlines in today's newspapers and magazines and the electronic media.

    The CDFI Fund was part of the law (1994) when newly elected President Clinton signed the law that formed the CDFI Fund in the U. S. Treasury Department.

    CDFIs finance micro and small businesses, homeownership, affordable rental housing, childcare facilities and charter schools. About 1000 CDFIs are operating in the United States manage more than $10 billion in assets, providing much-needed financial services to low-income communities like PPEP Microbusiness and Housing Development Corporation, Inc., a certified CDFI in Tucson, Arizona as well as other CDFIs in similar communities across the United States,

    CDFIs use capital to leverage social, economic change by giving economically underserved people and families in communities the opportunity to enter the economic mainstream.

    The CDFI Fund, a federal award winning program housed in the Treasury Department, issues funds to certified CDFIs based on performance and community need and with the requirement to match dollar for dollar federal funds with private investment. Since 1995, the CDFI Fund's $771 million in equity investments has generated an additional $16 billion in non-federal financing in emerging domestic markets. Is there a lesson to be leaned here?

    CDFIs are an established strategy for successfully blending public and private sector resources. CDFIs are experts at the prudent use of scarse public funds, which they use to provide financing to emerging domestic markets. The CDFI industry is able to lend successfully in these markets in part because CDFIs build their borrowers' capacity by combining their financing with technical assistance such as homeownership counseling, entrepreneurial training and financial literacy education.

    Because of the mess we are all in, the federal government will have less to spend on domestic priorities in the next coming years, it MUST invest wisely in programs with a proven track record, such as the CDFI Fund. It must target funding priorities and additional resources to programs (CDFI Fund) that are successful in leveraging marginal federal investments. By increasing investments in these programs, the federal government can make sure that it is investing wisely in programs that will have a "return" on our investment. The CDFI Fund is one such federal program!

  • Posted By: FTBallesteros @ 11/19/2008 1:21:37 PM

    Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) have been lending to the poorest low wealth communities since the law was enacted in 1995.

    CDFIs finance micro and small businesses, homeownership, affordable rental housing, childcare facilities and charter schools. Over 1000 CDFIs operating in the United States manage more than $10 billion in assets, providing much-needed financial services to low-income communities across the United States. CDFIs use capital to leverage social, economic change by giving economically underserved people and communities the opportunity to enter the economic mainstream.

    Maybe Wall Street and the financial institutions that are no longer with us should have studied the model that was used to create the CDFI Fund.

  • Posted By: greatmidwest @ 11/18/2008 1:51:39 AM



    Dan, great article!

    The problem is there are too many "faux expert talking heads" appearing on cable tv, and walking the halls of the white House & Congress who just don't know enough about the complexities of the US and global economy and such. These people just talk to hear themselves speak and really have very little credibility with regards to the subject matter. And it's not just limited to the subject of economics. It could be with regards to civil rights, foreign policy, health care, education, renewable energy, and the global environment .

    I laughed the other day when I heard one talking head, Ben Stein blabbering on CNN's Larry King Live about how Treasury Sec. Henry Paulson didn't have a grasp of the current US economic problems. CHECK OUT YOU TUBE: PETER SCHIFF WAS RIGHT IN 2006-2007. In the clips it shows all these "faux expert talking heads" disagreeing with the President of Euro Pacific Capital, Peter Schiff., who actually knows about the subject matter he speaks about......Americans can no longer afford to listen to people who don't have their facts straight. A mind is a terrible thing to waste! God Bless America

  • Posted By: Jeremy Freedman @ 11/17/2008 1:41:04 PM

    I don't agree

  • Posted By: OnlyCure=Truth @ 11/17/2008 1:33:34 AM

    According to Devvy Kidd, "Why A Bankrupt America?" The Federal Reserve pays the Bureau of Engraving & Printing approximately $23 for each 1,000 notes printed. 10,000 $100 notes (one million dollars) would thus cost the Federal Reserve $230. They then secure a pledge of collateral equal to the face value from the U.S. government. The collateral is our land, labor, and assets... collected by their agents, the IRS. By authorizing the Fed to regulate and create money (and thus inflation), Congress gave private banks power to create profits at will. End the Fed.

  • Posted By: Holly Garfield @ 11/16/2008 3:06:41 PM

    The whole principle of 'securitization' made the mortgage markets actually insecure. It created what the Doug Adams 'Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy' books called SEP - Somebody Else's Problem. When the mortgage gets sold to someone else, or someone else completes the application then it is their problem, not yours. If you are the mortgage broker then someone else's money is funding the purchase. If you are the bank selling the mortgage then someone else will take the loss if it goes bad. If you are buying a CDO you base yoru decision on someone else's ratings. If you are the rating agency, then you rate the CDO based on the insurance company's (someone else) rating. If you are the insurance c ompany then you base your rates on someone else (back to the broker) getting accurate information. Nowhere along this loop is anyone doing their own homework. And when things fall apart everyone sues that 'someone else' for bad information. No one is going to say 'I am responsible for checking things out before I buy.' When this whole process is done without being able to see what is in the CDO in the first place, and multiple investors hold pieces of a single mortgage, and even the mortgage servicer has a hard time telling who holds a mortgage that needs to be renegotiated then you have a real boondoggle.

    These banks in the article are running a responsible business. There is no SEP because there is no someone else involved. Another recent article was about mortgage bankers demanding sexual favors from mortgage brokers. That doesn't happen (or not nearly as much) with the internal arrangement because sexual harrassment inside a company is a huge career killer. Sexual harrassment of a broker leaves the broker with no one who will take action on a complaint if the broker did complain. Keep the process internal and you keep the process honest.

  • Posted By: SnglMom @ 11/16/2008 12:24:16 PM

    I'm glad some one has pointed out the ridiculousness of this Republican argument. I just wish that they would also do an article on who exactly is in foreclosure. Flippers and investors, you know those people that don't actually live in the homes. They have high percentages of foreclosure. And I also know personally, that even with a good credit score and stable income, fixed rate mortgages WERE NOT BEING OFFERED. Some people even tried to get them to no avail.

  • Posted By: C. MacLean @ 11/16/2008 11:11:28 AM

    Thank you for this very timely article. Three things stand out:

    1. Because these companies don't sell their mortgages, they stay emotionally invested in the long-term process of helping people meet their financial obligations, not the short-term process of reaping profits but abandoning the customer. These are mortgage companies who speciallize in mortgages, not financial companies who specialize in finance.

    2. Turns out Greenspan was right, after all: he couldn't conceive of top managers behaving in a way that didn't safeguard the lending practices, of managers who refused to practice fiscal restraint, so he didn't see the collapse coming - when companies behave responsibly and ethically, everyone profits. When greed is the determining factor, everyone loses.

    3. Shame on the WSJ and Fox for pointing the fingers at minorities, the poor, and the Democrats for "forcing" lenders to lend irresponsibily - mortgage companies did that all by themselves, for the worst reasons.

  • Posted By: williambanzai7 @ 11/16/2008 9:57:53 AM

    LETS DO THE SUBPRIME WARP AGAIN!
    (THE END OF MORAL HAZARD)
    (Lets Do the TIME WARP, Rocky Horror Picture Show)
    WilliamBanzai7

    It's astounding, markets are fleeting
    Greenspan's Madness takes its toll
    But listen closely, not for very much longer
    We've got to regain control

    I remember doing the Subprime Warp
    Drinking those moments when
    MORAL HAZARD would skip past me and the greed would be calling
    Let's do the Subprime Warp again...
    Let's do the Subprime Warp again!

    It's just a AAA CDO to the left
    And then a backstop CDS to the right
    With your hands on your FLIPS
    You bring those TOXIC TRANCHES in tight
    But it's the ALT-A thrust that really drives you insane,
    Let's do the Subprime Warp again!

    It's so dreamy, oh fantasy free me
    So you can't see me, no not at all
    In another dimension, with fraudulent intention
    Well-deluded, I see all
    With a bit of a mind flip
    You're there in the SHADOW BANKING slip
    And nothing can ever be the same
    You're spaced out on SECURITIZATION, like you're under sedation
    Let's do the Subprime Warp again!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse