How to Bail Out General Motors

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: sheebe @ 11/17/2008 1:32:47 AM

    Don't give them no money! Make them file Chapter 11. Then, they can start over. The Union will be none! Then they can hire people non Union. Unions are a big part in sucking up the money from the Corproations. So let them fall. This is getting to anger many American's. Whats next? No bail out!!

  • Posted By: USA a OK @ 11/17/2008 12:24:50 AM

    If we don't manufacture anything in the USA how do we have an economy? I think from what I see in developing economies is them manufacturing products and sending them to other countries.
    If we lose the auto companies where do they find jobs? Work at Mc Donalds for minimum? How do you make payments on your foreign car and overpriced home?

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/17/2008 12:45:26 AM

      OK, GM produces cars, sells them for 35 billion loss, Goverment covers this loss by borroing money from China - as good as buying these cars from China. Becides, US produces several 21 Century goods becides cars, using innovative technologies (more advanced than in Europe an dJapan, by the way). It looks like only Detroit is still in the middle of 20th Century.

  • Posted By: JWilly48519 @ 11/16/2008 11:39:06 PM

    It looks to me as if the doomsday scenario will come to pass...Chapter 11 for GM and Chrysler, Chapter 11 or worse for many shared suppliers, Chapter 11 or worse for many of *their* suppliers, Chapter 7 for the GM and Chrysler dealer bases as the sales trajectory shifts to Ford and the Japanese/German/Korean brands, chaotic production stoppages and quality declines for all remaining manufacturers as the massive supplier base grinds to a halt. Innumerable auto-plant-community small businesses out of business due to lack of customer expenditures. My guess is that we'll avoid a depression as formally defined.

    One thing to watch will be how GM handles the international bookkeeping in regard to which distributed or shared assets are attributed to profitable extra-US operations like GM China, Britain, Germany and Australia...in fact, it'll be interesting to see if those extra-US operations are killed by the dissolution even though they have positive asset/liability ratios and positive local cash positions in addition to their profitability. Likewise, it may be interesting to watch how the distributed or shared liabilities are allocated.

    If we go into depression because the government couldn't manage the economy and wouldn't set a consistent strategy for both gasoline pricing and fuel economy and then stick to it, who will the voters blame? I'm surprised that certain Republican senators aren't focused more on that question.

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/17/2008 12:12:35 AM

      I makes sense to let them go to Chapter 11 and give them $35 billion for one year ONLY. It will sustain normal operations for this year, while contracts renegotiations are under way, so thie sub-contractors will not be harmed during this year. It MUST be stated as a condition: under Chapter 11 only and only once, then judge decides if they can sustain themselves under new contracts. Of course, their managers and purdue1 will lose their billions on Big 3 stocks, but it is not our concern.

  • Posted By: Texas Jake @ 11/16/2008 10:40:56 AM

    The power shift in the election was mostly cosmetic, as the Feds and company will continue to drop financial bombs on our soil.

    Ride the horse in the direction it is running. Folks, we have been shown that our government will grant bailouts no matter what the vast majority of citizens say. It is pointless, in this political climate, to debate yes or no. The only productive topic is - How can our bailout best benefit us?

    Electric Vehicle developers are stonewalled when they try to obtain large-format nickel metal hydride NiMH batteries. Chevron Oil has gained control of the patents covering most large-format NiMH batteries. Chevron, and the combined strength of the oil/automotive industrial complex, now controls the production of these batteries and they are squashing the technology. http://www.evworld.com/article.cfm?storyid=1198

    Financial Terrorism - Prosecute companies who are blocking electric vehicle development under The PATRIOT Act. In international technology blockades, use the United Nation - http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/index.php?lang=en. Seize the patents, and insist our automakers immediately mass produce non-petroleum cars and trucks as a major component of the eminent bailout.

    Or, http://www.greencarcongress.com/ explains PHEV NiMH patent suppression.

    • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 11:00:08 AM

      Are you a friggin' conspiracy moron or what? Chevy (that's GM) is already tooling up for the Volt which is an entirely electric vehicle. Jesus, what are talking about? Chrysler has 3 electric vehicles completing R&D stages. Where is Honda? Nissan? Toyota?

      GM has DOUBLE the amount of vehicles that get more than 30+ MPG than any other make. Yea, great conspiracy Einstein.

      My god, can people actually have some clue about what they are talking about before coming into a discussion as an expert?

      • Posted By: Texas Jake @ 11/16/2008 11:22:03 AM

        Your facts are as correct as mine. The difference is our perception of scale. You see the trickle, and I see the dam. Your anger is misguided onto me.

        You say conspiracy theorist as if it is a bad thing. Critical thinkers challenge and threaten the status quo. Yet, dispite the valuable contributions, they become ostracized by the believers, who blindly discourage or dismise their ideas.

        • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 11:45:41 AM

          GM is tooling up the Volt and will produce in masses = FACT
          GM has more than DOUBLE the amount of vehicles with 30+ MPG = FACT
          Chrysler has 3 electric vehicles finishing up R&D= FACT

          Your statements are just opinionated garbage. First, you say that the government will bailout everyone irrespective of anything. Really?? What about Lehman Brothers? What about Circuit City? My god, get out of here.

          Then you go on some kind of moronic rant about a conspiracy that the Big 3 are in bed with big oil in an effort to kill electric vehicles. That, of course, goes contrary to the fact that GM is betting an enormous stake on the production and success of the Volt and subsequent models. Also, of course, that cash strapped Chrysler is dumping precision dollars into EV's also. You give absolutely NO FACTS but rather some sort of deceptive conjecture and ridiculous heresay.

          THEN, you go into some sort of nefarious scheme of financial terrorism and the Patriot Act.

          Look, go back to clipping newspaper articles and eating pudding from your thermos in the cozy atmosphere of your bunker. This is too serious of a situation to have morons like you throwing around non-sense grenades into the already under informed public.

          Here is GM's OFFICIAL site detailing the situation: www.gmfactsandfiction.com

          You can imagine us auto industry execs and workers twisting our mustaches plotting the end of the world while you review it.

          • Posted By: alfacanguro @ 11/16/2008 5:17:54 PM

            At $40K, and a hefty mfr subsidy (further LOSSES!) who is going to buy the REVOLT?

            • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 5:41:33 PM

              Oh, I got it now. So, now GM is stupid for not forseeing the huge reduction in gasoline prices. Phew...if we could only get a really sharp Joe like you in the executive ranks we'd be all set. I can't even imagine how much dough you raked in on the stock and commodities markets. You are, far and away, the brightest person on the earth.

              • Posted By: alfacanguro @ 11/17/2008 12:08:01 AM

                You're sounding like a desperate Detroit insider. Putting all of their eggs in one basket, as they did when they invested most of their capital in SUVs and Trucks is what has gotten the Big 3 in trouble. That's called mismanagement.

          • Posted By: Texas Jake @ 11/16/2008 3:44:45 PM

            A brief glance around your community dealership should clear things up for you. EV is not a new discovery; it is an intentionally ignored alternative. Compare the amount of gas powered cars to the others in the lot and try to convince yourself that the auto industry is not in bed with Big Oil.

            GM is tooling up the Volt and will produce in masses = DRIP DROP
            GM has more than DOUBLE the amount of vehicles with 30+ MPG = STILL GAS (and pitiful)

            the government will bailout everyone irrespective of anything. Correction: irrespective of the majority of citizens.

            big 3 are in bed with big oil in an effort to kill electric vehicles. Correction: in an effort to preserve the gas powered transportation system and Big Oils grip on our economy.

            ???GM is betting an enormous stake on the production and success of the Volt and subsequent models??? Wait; they are bankrupt, in debt, bleeding and needing a taxpayer bailout. Their enormous stake is an undersized, overdue reversal for their irresponsibly selfish gas powered strategy, and a pacifier for the hopeful. Adjust your blindfold; the light will give you a headache.

            Do you really believe the GM website is your best source of unbiased analysis of GM? Please.

            • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 4:31:18 PM

              Oh, I got it. Internal combustion engines shouldn't use gasoline or diesel. Thanks for playing Plato.

      • Posted By: alfacanguro @ 11/16/2008 5:15:09 PM

        Where is Toyota, Honda and Nissan? They are already producing fuel efficient, quality vehicles that consumers will buy. Where are the Big 3? And don't rattle-off current lab experiments that may or may not happen, and which consumers may or may not buy before they go bankrupt.

        If the Big 3 were so well-managed and held out strong future prospects, they wouldn't be needing a tax-payer bailout. Let them restructure on their own through a pre-packaged Chapter 11 filing. Bust the UAW, fire management, cut executive pay, and close unneeded mfg capacity.

        We're done with excuses and unfulfilled future promises.

    • Posted By: sebs112 @ 11/16/2008 11:46:45 AM

      "we have been shown that our government will grant bailouts no matter what the vast majority of citizens say"

      The vast majority of American's can't even balance their checkbooks And you want our elected politicians to take to our advice? Unless you are an economist specializing in economic cycles or Macroeconomics, you are in no position to give advice on such an intricate problem that threatens not only the US, but the ENTIRE world.

      The root cause of this financial mess rests on the shoulders of the millions of stupid Americans who purchased mortgages they could not pay back. How can you sign on the dotted line if you don't understand what you're siging? Therefore, the last people our elected officials should be taking advice from are the taxpayers.

      And as far as our automakers are concerned, GM is in the best position to get out of this mess if a bailout is granted. While Americans are singing the praises of Honda and Toyota,and blasting GM for their "junk" cars (NOT TRUE), the #1 fastest growing car in the world is Chevrolet--FACT!

      • Posted By: ducfred @ 11/16/2008 5:27:22 PM

        If GM is so good, why are they asking for bailouts? Waite, may be Americans are too stupid to buy the best car. They are too stupid to manage their money so they should just all hand it over to Uncle Sam to run their lives for them. While you at it, may be let GM take over Google and Apples of the world.

      • Posted By: Texas Jake @ 11/16/2008 3:59:43 PM

        Enter Your CommentIt is difficult to refute the notion that Americans are too stupid to know whats good for them, and that we need the government to tell us how to think and feel, especially to a person who considers themselves to be like that. How has giving up that power been working for you?
        The root cause of this financial mess rests on the shoulders of the FEDs model of imaginary value. It is pointless to argue how the US dollar is used, and not understand how it is created. Our economic system is not hard to understand, just hard to believe... because the average person cannot invent money out of thin air.

        And as far as our automakers are concerned, GM is in the best position to get out of this mess if a bailout is granted. Agreed.

  • Posted By: nunatak @ 11/16/2008 9:37:05 PM

    There is no doubt that our auto industry must be restructured. It's also questionable whether politicians are competent enough to tie the strategic changes required to our taxpayers dollars. Particularly as the track record seems to indicate they are more often tied to fund raising efforts of the lobbyists.

    However, to simply let this industry collapse under a Chapter 7 would not only be be devastating to our auto industry -- but would most likely start a cascade of collapse that would crush what's left of a manufacturing base that supports our national security interests. The simple solution may be to let our auto industry collapse, but the smart solution -- particularly if we need factories for ramp up for arms, and aerospace -- is to shepherd the critical components through these times until we can untangle what we need from what we want.

    I'd like to hear more from purdue1, or anyone, why GM wouldn't be eligible for a Chapter 11?

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 9:53:15 PM

      So, if automaker go to Chapter 11 or 7 - it means that it will immediately cease all operations? When it happened with air carriers - no one flight was cancelled, and because unions were flexible (what other choice?) - they emerged from Chapter 11 even before passengers noticed. So, let Big 3 go the same way, and then it is up to unions to decide how many workers lose their jobs. Bail them out with some preconditions (like Democrats want now) - being under the same contracts, they will try to cut operation cost (as required) by reducing cars reliability, performing less recearch, selling some facilities (and therefore laying off workers anyway). As a result, people will stop buying those low-quality cars, Detroit will eventually shut down, and all those workers will definitely lose their jobs. Can you produce another bail-out scenario (how it will help them compete and rebound in the near future, not all that patriotic nonsense)?

      • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 9:59:16 PM

        If you don't know the difference between a service industry like airlines and an automotive company that assembles vehicles from 14,000 from 3,000 suppliers....then you truly are hopeless. Let's see, will I fly a bankrupt airline for $190 and 3 hours in the next two weeks, yes. Will I buy a car for $30,000 that requires that is a long term investment that has warranties, service, and resale values?

        You are an idiot. The suppliers won't even make more parts to build with. This is exactly why ignorant outsiders can't understand the business and the implications involved. You're just a bag of air.

        • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 10:19:47 PM

          I did not ask you, worm, because all you care is to cash your Big 3 stocks (hope they will go up after bail-out? Think again). You claim that you are a Director of some supply chain, so answer why will you stop supplying if GM is still alive under Chapter 11 or 7 (they may get temporary help then, if run out of cash completely)? And you still did not explain to anybody (what we hear is only you hateful barks) how they will recover after the bail-out?

          • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 10:27:18 PM

            Let me say this slowly for you.....THEY....OWE....US....OVER...SIX....MILLION....DOLLARS...IN...RECEIVABLES.

            You have zero credibility, zero knowledge of the industry, and absolutely no f'ing idea waht you are even talking about. Rather than give you yet another chance to ignorantly claim that they can file Chapter 11...I think I'll just let you enjoy your own idiocy.

            • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 10:38:01 PM

              Bark-bark-bark. I bet I know about cars more than you (I have degree and repaired cars, and you are a Director, who still has not provided a single atgumentative idea. One thing you are right - I don't know much about Chapter 11 because I never was there, but you probably were, or will be soon. There you will meet your Big 3.

              • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 10:46:09 PM

                You don't need to know anything about Chapter 11 because it isn't feasible twit. That's the whole point that you continue to miss.

                • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 10:51:55 PM

                  What happened to you? You start speaking?? Then explain, as you were asked many times before, why Chapter 11 is not an option and what can be done under Chapter 7.

                  • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 10:56:47 PM

                    Chapter 7 is liquidation, dumb ass. That means they cease operations.

                    • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 10:58:22 PM

                      Still why not Chapter 11, "smart" ass? You were asked by me and other people several times.

                      • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 11:28:00 PM

                        I answered it ten f'ing times. I can't help the fact that you're too stupid to not understand it.

                        • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/17/2008 12:03:13 AM

                          Explain again, because nobody heard it yet. May be you hid it between your barks? Sorry, sometimes I can not understand my dog, and he might think then that I am stupid.

          • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 10:31:11 PM

            They 'recover' by selling more cars clown. It isn't just the Big 3. Toyota is down 40% also (oh my, imagine that). If this sales pace keeps up, they'll be radically f'ed also. The point is to tide them over until they can (first) trim production to meet the current sales pace and (second) start selling more when the economy picks up again. You act like they would be screwed even if they were selling in a normal economy.

            Man, just go away, please.

        • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 10:23:13 PM

          ...."they will try to cut operation cost (as required) by reducing cars reliability"

          I present to you the biggest moron on the earth. I'm quite sure this 'expert' doesn't know a bearing from a muffler. Let's follow him into this....that work out great. I mean, Circuit City opened their doors for business today....isn't that kinda the same thing? <roll eyes>

  • Posted By: KeithTomilson @ 11/16/2008 11:20:26 PM

    The auto companies SHOULD NOT be bailed out . Instead the government and the utility companies along with the postal service should place orders for a large number of hybrid high mileage vehicles that will get over fifty miles to a gallon on gasoline. With the PO in hand they can go to the banks and borrow the money like any other company can.
    company can

    • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 11:30:30 PM

      Are you serious?

      • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 11:56:55 PM

        You are too stupid to understand how it works for your stocks. Of course, no bank will give them loan for this fantastic project, but Obma administration will be able to use this trick to bail-out Big 3 through some bank - it will look as bank's bail-out. Similar thing already happened with $25 billion for electric cars.

  • Posted By: rebazhin @ 11/16/2008 10:58:01 PM

    Why should the government bailout the Big 3 auto companies? There was no bailouts for the steel industries all through the 80s, 90s and early 2000. Many companies went bankrupt or filed Chapter 11 and reorganized. The companies downsized and people lost their jobs.

    One of the main problems with the Big 3 is that have not been building cars that people want... cars that get higher gas mileage. Instead they have made millions of trucks and huge SUVs that regular folks can't afford to buy and they don't want them anyway. Toyta and Volkwagen are doing far better and are even hiring workers.

    The legacy insurance packages is what is killing the industry, but the Auto Workers Union won't budge on less of a package.

    In the case of the steelworkers the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) took over their pensions when the companies closed down. People got far less than what should have gotten.

    The auto industry needed severe reorganizing, but the government should not bail them out.

    • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 11:21:05 PM

      The steel industry should have been saved. That's in the best interest of our national security, period. We STILL don't have enough steel producing capacity. By the way, the ungodly rise in steel prices this year (and subsequent bust this month) really crippled the supply base and the big 3 as costs were passed on. I'm not saying I'm blaming the steel industry. In fact, we should have had more capacity here all along. But, it was destructive. I understand that it was due to scrap/alloy prices...but, geez that was painful on the recieving end.

      The UAW will have to budge.

      The big 3 are changing over to smaller vehicles. Ironically, the larger ones are selling again (proportional to the economy) since gas has plunged. But, they have committed to continue to tool up for smaller cars and hybrids. But, that doesn't happen overnight. They are moving very fast and I hope you do believe that. The last thing they want to do is build cars that don't sell well.

      The legacy costs are important, obviously. That's why they need to get to 2010. That's when the pensions go over to a private fund.

      If the big 3 go down prior to 2010, the PBGC also takes over.

      The restructuring will happen in any event. It's not letting them actually die that's important.

      • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 11:45:19 PM

        As I heard, pension plan is only a part of their problems. They still will have to pay 3 times more, than foreign competitors, for helath care and 30% more average salary. If these numbers are wrong, provide yourth, if they are right - explain how they can compete in 2010? Encorage americans to fulfil their patriotic duties and buy only american cars? Ironically I did (no much help, however), but for some reason some native born americans prefer Toyotas and Hondas.
        And still explain, why Chapter 11 is not an option?

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 11:21:45 PM

      This is Obama "change" in work. More is coming. I can not say much positive about latest GOP course, but is thi sblessed by Obama bailout the change you voted for?

  • Posted By: cjlacroix @ 11/16/2008 10:56:43 PM

    Bailout of the auto industry is as Senator Jon Kyl says: "Just giving them $25 billion doesn't change anything. It just puts off for six months or so the day of reckoning." He is right it???s just putting off the inevitable, The taxpayers will lose $25 billion for nothing. Why can???t our government leaders see it like it is? If consumers are not buying cars now and will not be buying cars six months from now, are we going to give them more money? Our leaders are messed up, they keep pouring money in the wrong places, how do you stimulate the economy by giving money to corporations? It???s obvious that the money needs to go to the people to start spending. We???d be further ahead if the government took the $700 billion and gave $150 thousand to each taxpaying citizen, people would be buying, paying down there mortgages, GM & Ford would be selling cars and not looking for a government bailout. But it???s business as usual in Washington, keep giving to the rich, wake up, it obviously isn???t working. Why is this matter being handled by politicians anyway, have economic professors work on a plan. It???s obvious the politicians can???t handle it.

  • Posted By: cjlacroix @ 11/16/2008 10:56:16 PM

    Bailout of the auto industry is as Senator Jon Kyl says: "Just giving them $25 billion doesn't change anything. It just puts off for six months or so the day of reckoning." He is right it???s just putting off the inevitable, The taxpayers will lose $25 billion for nothing. Why can???t our government leaders see it like it is? If consumers are not buying cars now and will not be buying cars six months from now, are we going to give them more money? Our leaders are messed up, they keep pouring money in the wrong places, how do you stimulate the economy by giving money to corporations? It???s obvious that the money needs to go to the people to start spending. We???d be further ahead if the government took the $700 billion and gave $150 thousand to each taxpaying citizen, people would be buying, paying down there mortgages, GM & Ford would be selling cars and not looking for a government bailout. But it???s business as usual in Washington, keep giving to the rich, wake up, it obviously isn???t working. Why is this matter being handled by politicians anyway, have economic professors work on a plan. It???s obvious the politicians can???t handle it.

  • Posted By: pavco @ 11/16/2008 8:34:10 PM

    Who has the most money to lose if GM goes Bankrupt...............simple answer.....Current Creditors, UAW workers and retirees, shareholders ( many of who are UAW workers and family. If these are the three parties with the most money to lose of GM goes Bankrupt then fthe first solution is the Current Creditors come to the table.....put there loans on non accrual basis, modify maturity dates and write down the loans on their books. Secondly the UAW has to come to the table with a wage and benefit reduction package of no less than 50% of the current wage/benefit package......they average UAW worker earns $ 73 an hour.....no company can operate with those type of production costs............Toyota on the other hand has ave. hourly costs of $ 43 per hr...........................so there you have it..............the players in the company itself MUST be the first source of financial relief for the Corporation.........................certainly no bailout should occur unless the players do their part first.

    • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 10:07:29 PM

      Knock, knock...suppliers buddy. Then their suppliers. Then their suppliers. You kill GM then you've effectively killed the core of our manufacturing base in this country....what little is left.

  • Posted By: curiousDoug @ 11/16/2008 10:21:33 AM

    Are these kinds of 'bailouts' legal in terms of international trade. Surely this is a kind of government subsidy for overpriced cars, and exporting them won't be allowed by the WTO. I could not imagine America would allow a European or Asian country to do something like this with one of their exporting manufacturers.

    • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 10:56:32 AM

      Is it legal in terms of international trade to allow NIssan, VW, Toyota, and Honda to build factories and get tax abatement for 10 years? Is it legal to suppress the value of currencies which acts as a indirect subsidy? Is it 'fair' for Japan to sell their cars here but slap US cars with resistrictions in the Japanese market?

      The US needs to exit the WTO as we've only been screwed royally again and again.

      • Posted By: occomment @ 11/16/2008 9:44:58 PM

        I have never seen a more obnoxious poster.

        take some polite pills, dude, you are very angry

  • Posted By: drupus2 @ 11/16/2008 9:42:03 PM

    Its quite simple, actually. The oil companies should bail out the auto industry.

  • Posted By: wilsan @ 11/16/2008 9:08:53 PM

    I forgot to mention...

    Newsweek is part of the "in the Tank for Obama" media. Their news is generally slanted, biased and spun to meet liberal needs, such as to elect Obama..
    However, this author, Robert Samuelson, one of the few (perhaps the only) writers that Newsweek has that is trustworthy.

  • Posted By: tkjer @ 11/16/2008 9:07:59 PM

    One of the pundits on the morning news panel shows made a reference to the fact that all of the bailouts are going to the top???banking institutions and corporations. All of this money will require oversight and accountability that will suck out more money. Why not just send $20K to every adult who pays taxes or qualifies for tax credits? Let us spend, save or invest the money as we chose. This is the bailout for everyone. Bankers can do what they want with their money. Car manufacturers can do what they want with their money. Workers who are laid off or put out of work because of bankruptcies, etc. will have $20K for retraining, health, etc. Congress could decide to make reinvestment of the $20K in stocks, health insurance, cars, mortgage payments fax-free. Others would pay income tax on the $20K. There would be no additional bureaucracy to direct trillions of dollars into the economy that would evaporate before ???real people??? would see any benefit.

  • Posted By: wilsan @ 11/16/2008 9:05:23 PM

    The Democrats plan to throw government money at Detroit & Unions is wasteful & wrong.

    A better plan, especially for the long run, would be to pursue Chapt 11, reorganize, negotiate debt with suppliers, renegotiate union contracts to lower cost of operation, and then get on with rebuilding a future.

    I read yesterday where the Leader of the UAW said, "No Concessions"... If that is truly the UAW's position... Then the Big Three should just go out of business and let's move the brands to toyota. And, of course, leave the UAW membership back (here) in Michigan. We're all going to be on welfare here in Michigan soon anyway, because Gov Granholm after six years does not have a clue how to fix the state's economy.

  • Posted By: jlgab @ 11/16/2008 7:09:33 PM

    We should NOT help any auto factories or auto dealerships in the states where the GOP's don't want to help them, let the factories and dealerships close in those states and all those workers get laid-off. We SHOULD ONLY help the states whose senators vote to help the auto industry.



    • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 7:53:30 PM

      Do you want to pay hard-earned money to bailout this jerk (he admitted he is one of those Detroit Directors). I enjoy to bait Democrat jerks, letting them show the true colors.

      • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 8:58:16 PM

        I enjoy to expose recent immigrants who came here to work for the money but have no intention of building our society. It's easy to carry a US passport but it's sure hard for them to become an actual citizen. I'll tell you what. Pick up a rifle and do a 2 year tour in Iraq.

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 7:23:15 PM

      Good thinking.Only Japanese and European units will survive (because we do not help them anyway)

      • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 7:31:19 PM

        OH we don't? You mean allowing them to not pay taxes for 10 years in the states where they buy factories isn't help. That Ph.D. in math (albeit from some garbage university in god-knows-where) is failing you. You mean allowing Japan to supress their currency isn't helpful?

        Should we or should we not follow the advice of the intergalactically stupid?

  • Posted By: tscar12 @ 11/16/2008 8:09:34 PM

    The problem in this bail-out is that it will only prolong the agony of G.M. going into chapter 11 and cost not only current taxpayers but all those young kids that voted for Obama millions. Why? Because the world economy is in recession. All auto makers are in trouble and that includes Asian. Even china is cutting back. So the money no matter what strings you attached will do nothing until the economy turns around and Americans start buying cars again.
    So what is the best course? First of all, we need to understand that this has been a well-known problem for 2 years. Two years ago, my parents died and in settling the estate, we saw that my father had invested in Dividend paying stock in G.M and ford. Now this type of stock cost more but at the time both were trading at around 18-23$ a share. However, we clearly saw the problems and sold all the stock.
    1) Force G.M. into chapter 11 with the understanding that there will be strict oversight of both execs and unions.
    2) Tell G.M. that during the chapter 11, the government will INVEST in modernizing G.M. so that it can compete but that money must be paid back with a low interest rate.
    3) Take the billions that will go to the auto industry (since the Democrats and Obama are tools of the UAW) and use that money to create jobs in research into new fuels, infrastructure, and saving people's homes.

    Neither the private sector nor the government can solve the problem on their own but when we are looking at a possible 1.5-2.0 trillion deficit if Obama and the Democrats follow through with their agenda then our children face a very grim future.

    Just take one look at who owns stock in the company and this includes the execs and the UAW and ones now sees why they do not want chapter 11 but a handout from the pushover Obama who won't stand up to the special interest groups in Congress or the Democratic Party just as Bush was in bed with his special interest groups.

  • Posted By: kloder1985 @ 11/16/2008 6:37:17 PM

    The oil companies must bail out the automakers. These guys have a symbiotic relationship that has caused the Big Three to drag their feet in producing more efficient vehicles. Don't punish me by taking my hard-earned tax money. I don't even drive.

    • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 7:40:58 PM

      Yes, I'm sure the Big 3 really appreciated, contributed to, and colluded in soaring gas prices that have depleted their entire cash war chest.

  • Posted By: kimlynhiatt@msn.com @ 11/16/2008 4:40:12 PM

    The oil industry needs to come to the aid of the auto industry because without the automobile the oil industry will be next.

    • Posted By: Texas Jake @ 11/16/2008 6:35:04 PM

      Big Oil has come to GM's rescue. They have lowered gas prices. Just long enough to crush the alternative fuel initatives, and get the bailout passed. Then they will bring it back up for another round of gnashing of teeth.

    • Posted By: ducfred @ 11/16/2008 5:17:52 PM

      The big three are just part of the auto industry, not the auto industry. There are plenty of other auto manufacturers that produce cars that people want to buy. And why shoild peoplemaking $10 per hour bail out fat cat reitrees getting $50 per hour just sitting at home. Redistributing income anyone? from the poor to the rich?

      • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 5:52:57 PM

        Have you ever considered that tranferring $25k - $50k per car to foreign companies and governments (out of the US) might just be a bad idea? Did that light bulb ever turn on for you?

    • Posted By: bighappy @ 11/16/2008 5:06:34 PM

      Probably Big 3 can cry for help to Chaves? I don't think serious oil capitalists will be willing to bail0out a dead horse.

    • Posted By: purdue1 @ 11/16/2008 4:46:41 PM

      Huh? You think used cars don't use gasoline? What are you talking about?

  • Posted By: kenmi @ 11/16/2008 6:26:25 PM

    How much do you make? I'm sure that there is a foreign writer out there who would be willing to do a better job than you do for 1/10 of the pay. Lead by your example. We can no longer afford expensive hypocrits.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse